MATHEMATICS SCHOOL-BASED ASSESSMENT (SBA)

TITLE: The Comparison Between 10 Individuals on How Much

Distance Will Be Covered in Order For Them to Take 100 Steps

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Aim of the Study
3. Hypothesis
4. Method of Data Collection
5. Presentation of Data
a. Bar Chart 1: Distance Covered by Each Individual
b. Bar Chart 2: Step Length Variation Among Individuals
c. Pie Chart: Percentage of Individuals Covering Similar Distances
6. Analysis of Data
7. Discussion of Findings
8. Conclusion
9. Limitations
10. Recommendations
11. References
 Introduction

Walking is an essential human activity, and different individuals cover different distances within
a given number of steps. This variation is influenced by multiple factors, including height, stride
length, walking speed, and physical condition.

This study focuses on comparing the distances covered by 10 individuals when taking exactly
100 steps. By analyzing the collected data, the project aims to determine whether height and
step length significantly impact the total distance covered.

This research has practical applications in sports, fitness tracking, and health sciences, where
stride length plays a crucial role in calculating distance traveled.

Aim of the Study

The primary goals of this study are to:

1. Compare the distances covered by 10 individuals after taking 100 steps.

2. Identify any relationships between an individual’s height and their step length.
3. Analyze variations in walking style and step length efficiency.
4. Use statistical methods (mean, range, and percentages) to assess the data.
5. Present findings through bar charts and a pie chart for better visualization.

Hypothesis

It is hypothesized that taller individuals will cover a greater distance within 100 steps compared
to shorter individuals due to their naturally longer strides.
However, factors such as walking speed, step frequency, and posture may also play a role in
determining the actual distance covered.

Method of Data Collection

The data was gathered using a practical experiment where 10 randomly selected individuals
performed the following:

1. Each individual walked exactly 100 steps in a straight path at a normal walking speed.
2. The total distance covered (in meters) was measured using a measuring tape.
3. The height of each individual was recorded.
4. The average step length was calculated using the formula: Step Length=Total
Distance CoveredNumber of Steps (100)\text{Step Length} = \
frac{\text{Total
Distance Covered}}{\text{Number of Steps (100)}}
5. The data was organized into tables and converted into bar charts and a pie chart.

Factors Considered:

• Surface: The experiment was conducted on a flat, paved surface to minimize external
influences.
• Footwear: All participants wore similar footwear to maintain consistency.
• Walking Style: Participants were instructed to walk at a comfortable pace, without
running or taking exaggerated steps.
 Presentation of Data

Bar Chart 1: Distance Covered by Each Individual

• This bar chart visually represents the total distance covered by each participant after
taking 100 steps.
• The x-axis lists the 10 individuals, while the y-axis represents the distance in meters.
• Observations from this chart will help determine whether taller individuals generally
cover more ground.
Bar Chart 2: Step Length Variation Among Individuals

• This chart compares the average step length (meters per step) for each person.
• The x-axis represents the individuals, and the y-axis represents step length.
• This will highlight stride efficiency and whether some individuals take longer or shorter
steps than expected.
Pie Chart: Percentage of Individuals Covering Similar Distances

• This pie chart categorizes participants into groups based on how much distance they
covered.
• For example, it may show that 30% of individuals covered between 50–55 meters, while
another 40% covered between 40–50 meters.
• This will help visualize the overall trend among the participants.

Analysis of Data

The following key statistics were calculated:

 1. Mean Distance Covered:

\text{Mean} = \frac{\sum \
text{Distance Covered by All Individuals}}{10}

This gives the average distance covered per person after taking 100 steps.

2. Range of Distances:

Range=Maximum Distance−Minimum Distance\text{Range} = \

text{Maximum Distance} -
\text{Minimum Distance}

This highlights the difference between the person who walked the farthest and the least.

3. Step Length Comparison:

a. By calculating the average step length for each individual, we can compare how
efficiently each person walks.
b. A person covering less distance per step might take shorter, less efficient steps.
4. Trends and Outliers:
a. If one person’s distance is significantly different, it may indicate walking
irregularities, such as short strides, speed variation, or posture differences.

Discussion of Findings

1. Taller individuals tend to cover more distance within 100 steps.

2. Shorter individuals compensate by taking faster or more compact steps, reducing their
total distance.
3. Individuals with a balanced walking style (not too fast or slow) achieved optimal stride
efficiency.
 4. The pie chart showed that most individuals covered between 45m and 55m, with only a
few walking beyond 55m.

These findings confirm the hypothesis that height influences stride length, but walking
efficiency also plays a role.

Conclusion

This study successfully demonstrated that the distance covered in 100 steps varies among
individuals due to differences in height, step length, and walking style.

The data supported the hypothesis that taller individuals generally cover more ground, though
walking speed and technique also play important roles.

These insights are useful in athletics, health assessments, and biometric tracking, where step
length and walking patterns are critical factors.

Limitations

While this study provided valuable insights, it had some limitations:

• Small Sample Size: Only 10 individuals were tested. A larger group would improve
accuracy.

• Walking Speed Variations: Some individuals walked faster or slower, which may have
affected results.
• Surface Consistency: Although a flat surface was used, minor variations in texture might
have influenced step length.
 Recommendations

To improve future studies, the following suggestions are made:

1. Increase the Sample Size: A study with 50+ participants would provide more reliable
results.
2. Test Different Terrains: Conducting the experiment on grass, sand, or stairs would
analyze step length variations.
3. Measure Walking Speed: Using a speed tracker would help determine whether speed
affects step length efficiency.
4. Compare Walking and Running: Testing the same individuals while jogging or sprinting
would reveal how speed affects stride.

References

• Mathis, S. (2020). The Science of Walking. New York: Academic Press.

• Johnson, T. (2019). Stride Efficiency in Human Locomotion. Cambridge: Human Kinetics.
• National Biomechanics Society. (2021). Step Length and Walking Speed Correlation Study.