CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology
CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history: The growing global energy demand from industry results in significant ecological and economical costs. Aim-
Available online 31 July 2020 ing to decrease the impact of machining operations, an increasing number of research activities and publica-
tions regarding energy efficient machine tools and machining processes can be found in the literature. This
Keywords: keynote paper provides an overview of current machine- and process-related measures to improve the
Energy efficiency
energy efficiency of metal cutting machine tools. Based on an analysis of the energy requirements of machine
Machine tool
Metal cutting
tool components, design measures to reduce the energy demand of main and support units are introduced.
Next, methods for an energy efficient operation of machine tools are reviewed. Furthermore, latest develop-
ments and already available energy efficiency options in the machine tool industry are discussed. The paper
concludes with recommendations and future research questions for more energy efficient machine tools.
© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of CIRP. This is an open access article under the CC BY
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2020.05.008
0007-8506/© 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of CIRP. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
647 B. Denkena et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 69 (2020) 646667
demand for the cutting movement itself is selected as useful output, is determined by the machine tool’s features, e.g. size, arrangement
which is represented by the spindle power demand PSpindle. In sum- of axes, moving masses and degree of automation. The variable part
mary, this results in the following term for the assessment of the of the overall energy demand, which encompasses all energy
energy efficiency of machine tools: demands that are required for the actual processing of the material,
PSpindle consequently depends on part characteristics, tool features, cutting
hMT ¼ ð1Þ parameters and process cooling strategy [227]. It must be noted that
PTotal
there are interactions and coupling effects between these factors and
As indicated by equation (1), an increase in energy efficiency is that they can have an influence on both fixed and variable energy
achieved by maximising the cutting performance while at the same demand at the same time. For example, Neugebauer et al. showed
time minimising the overall power demand of the machine tool. In that additional and larger support units are required with increased
practice, this means utilising the work spindle’s full power range and workspace size, which ultimately leads to a higher overall energy
selecting process parameters in such a way that the removed chip demand [157]. Consequently, the choice of the machine tool signifi-
volume is maximised. Moreover, the base load and power require- cantly affects the energy demand.
ments of the support units must be reduced. In this regard, a number However, there are other factors which have a (more or less pro-
of measures has been developed by several authors and is presented nounced) impact on the energy requirements of machine tools. For
and evaluated within the framework of this paper. instance, Bittencourt proposes an alternative classification of influ-
At this point, it must be emphasised that optimal operating condi- encing factors into six main categories: machine tool, measurement,
tions are assumed in the evaluation. Primarily, this means a high workpiece material, method of production and control, production
spindle utilisation. However, to meet quality requirements, machine environment and machine operator [30]. In this context, Mert et al.
and process cooling are usually necessary due to inevitable thermal also discussed whether the operator can positively influence the
effects, which in turn reduce efficiency. Depending on the applica- energy efficiency of machine tools through appropriate services, e.g.
tion, an optimum operating point must therefore be identified. training or telephone support [147]. In addition, the operating time
Implemented energy efficiency measures provide only minor of the machine tool naturally influences the energy demand [26].
improvements, when the machine tool is operated inefficiently. Based on shift models, runtimes and load factors, the machine tool
remains in specific energetic states for different periods of time.
3. Energy demand of machine tools Depending on whether small or large series production is considered,
there is also a different distribution of the machine states and conse-
In one of the first studies on energy efficiency of machining, De quently times in different energy states. In both cases, however,
Filippi et al. [81] found that the energy demand of the machining pro- standby concepts can be used for longer production pauses [36].
cess is significantly higher than the required energy for the chip for- Varying process parameters influence not only the energy
mation. According to Zhou et al. [227], the variable part accounts for requirement but also the tool wear and quality of the workpiece.
20 to 30% of the total energy requirement in machining. These find- Here, an optimisation of the process parameters with regard to an
ings are supported by other studies, e.g. [22] or [89]. In addition to energy optimal solution does not always meet the demand for mini-
the need for electrical energy, other media such as compressed air, mum costs [172]. Furthermore, the choice of the cooling strategy has
cold water or cooling lubricant are often required. The exhaust air as a significant influence on the energy requirement, but can also influ-
well as other introduced media must be extracted from the work- ence the workpiece quality, so that it is difficult to make a clear state-
space to be treated and eventually stored for resupply. Depending on ment regarding the advantages of a particular strategy in terms of
the external boundary conditions, the supply with media is central- energy efficiency [97,122]. The optimisation of process parameters in
ised or decentralised in a plant [131]. In the case of a decentralised machining processes has been investigated many times in the past
supply, all support units are within the system boundaries of the and particularly depends on the target variable to be optimised, as
machine tool. Typically, electrical energy and compressed air are the shown in Chapter 6.
most relevant energy inputs [109].
In this section, an overview of factors influencing the energy 3.2. Assessment of the energy demand
demand of machine tools is given. Subsequently, an energy break-
down of machine tool components is presented based on the In most cases, the true energy demand of a machine tool depends not
reviewed literature. Finally, an evaluation of the energy saving poten- only on its specification, but also on the considered application, see Fig. 4.
tials is presented. The power rating of a machine tool consequently offers little information
about its actual energy demand in use. Hence, the quantification of the
3.1. Factors influencing the energy demand true energy demand of machine tools is indispensable for the identifica-
tion and implementation of specific energy efficiency measures in the
A number of factors influence the energy demand of machine industry, as stated in the ISO 14955-1 standard [109,121].
tools, which are summarised in Fig. 4. The fixed energy demand, In principle, a distinction must be made between existing
which includes the energy required for idle running of the machine, machine tools and those to be designed. For systems that do not yet
physically exist, simulative approaches often represent the only
option to estimate the true energy demand in use (see Chapter 6). For
existing machine tools, power measurements are a more reliable
method to determine the actual energy requirements. Although, it is
possible to apply simulation-based approaches for existing machines
to reduce the measuring effort.
The metrological determination of the energy demand requires
specified system boundaries. It may also be necessary to consider
other media that result in relevant energy flows, such as compressed
air, coolant or cutting fluid [109]. Before the actual energy measure-
ments, time studies are required to obtain typical usage scenarios of
machines under consideration and to identify relevant energy states
to be measured [62]. Operating hours, for example, may be deter-
mined by reading of spindle hours, machine data acquisition or
manufacturing execution systems [26]. The ISO 14955-2 standard
provides a set of rules for the correct measurement of energy and
Fig. 4. Factors of energy demand, adapted from [227].
media requirements [110]. In addition to the already existing ISO
649 B. Denkena et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 69 (2020) 646667
Fig. 7. Average, minimum and maximum fixed energy shares of six reviewed machine
tools based on [137].
Fig. 9. Share of energy demand of main and support units of five considered machine
tools for machining of a reference workpiece based on [4,8,32,53,101].
3.4. Evaluation of energy saving potentials machine and process conditioning, which do not directly contribute
to the value creation. The actual energy requirement and energy dis-
To evaluate potential energy savings on machine tools, an over- tribution of machine tools depend on various factors, e.g. the machine
view of typically occurring energy losses is necessary. Neugebauer et configuration, the type of machining, the process cooling strategy and
al. first distinguish between load-independent and load-dependent the operating parameters. Hence, the identification of a machine
losses, which have to be analysed at a system level [157]. Subse- tool’s true energy characteristics as well as the technical and eco-
quently, a further distinction is made between four loss types: elec- nomic evaluation of potential energy efficiency measures regularly
tric, damping, friction and flow losses. Minimising these losses is of requires time-consuming measurements or simulations. Against the
course beneficial, but offers relatively low energy saving potentials background of the subordinate relevance of energy costs, the wide-
due to the advanced state of development of most machine tool com- spread implementation of energy efficiency measures has not taken
ponents. Beck et al., on the other hand, distinguish a total of eight place so far.
types of energy losses, particularly addressing losses due to idle In principle, energy savings potentials can be attributed to two
machine states, incorrect component dimensioning and inefficient approaches, namely the technological optimisation of individual
technology application [27]. According to their approach, all losses components and the energy efficient process design including the
are dissipated as waste heat and only a minor proportion of the over- demand-oriented supply of media and energy. In the following, the
all energy input is used for the value adding process. main units relevant for value creation are discussed with regard to
In addition to the technically inherent losses of individual compo- their energy efficiency, whereby the work spindle usually has a domi-
nents, typical causes for energy waste in machine tools are oversizing, nant influence on the energy demand. Subsequently, the peripheral
idle times and overproduction, e.g. in the form of excessive pressure support units are discussed, with cooling and lubrication units as
levels in the cutting fluid system [39,87,157,177,214]. Oversizing of well as hydraulics having a decisive influence on the overall energy
main units and especially auxiliary equipment presents the most com- requirements and therefore being focused. After presenting optimisa-
mon reason for poor energy efficiency. Based on unrealistic estimates tion potentials at main and support unit level, Chapter 6 describes the
of the load cases, machine components are usually oversized to ensure energy efficiency potentials resulting from the interaction of these
their functionality. Consequently, the design for an excessively overes- units during the operation of machine tools.
timated load case leads to inefficient operating points for the main and
support units in actual machining processes with significantly lower 4. Main units
loads [27]. Hence, optimising the units’ design and mode of operation
holds a significant potential to increase the overall energy efficiency of The design of the main components depends directly on the
machine tools. Here, the key to high energy efficiency is to provide desired process. Generally, main units include the following compo-
energy and media according to actual process requirements. This solu- nents: drive systems for feed drives and work spindles, mechanical
tion approach can be also applied to the issue of overproduction. How- translation units for indirectly driven systems (e.g. ball screw drives,
ever, the reduction of the machine components’ energy requirements rack and pinion drives as well as toothed belts and gearboxes), bear-
must be achieved without compromising the process stability and ings and guideways. Fig. 7 reveals that the energy demand of servo
machining result [137,161,226]. drives may account for one tenth to nearly one third of a machine
It should also be noted that the efficiency of induction motors tool’s total energy demand, depending on the process. In the first
increases with the power rating, see Fig. 10. Thus, the efficiency of part of this section, efficiency improvement measures for electrical
oversized motors is not inherently worse. However, induction motors motors and inverters are reviewed, some of which also apply to
have their maximum efficiency at a designated operating point. motors for auxiliary equipment. The second part focusses on the
Hence, the efficiency advantage of larger motors decreases with impact of bearings and guideways on the energy efficiency of
increasing distance to the designated point of operation [177]. A machine tools.
needs-based dimensioning may also lead to lower investment costs
[87]. To increase efficiency beyond the needs-based provision of 4.1. Drives and control units
energy and the use of efficient components, the recovery of unavoid-
able waste heat can further increase the overall efficiency of compo- Main electrical drives create linear and rotational movements of
nents and entire machine tools [117]. tools and workpieces. Therefore, the components are directly depen-
dent on the processing power. For processes with high processing
power requirements, the efficiency of main drives has a significant
impact on the total energy efficiency of the machine tool. For the gen-
eral optimisation of the efficiency of motors, including feed drives
and main spindle drives, efficiency classes and their test procedures
have been defined in the standards IEC 60034-30-1:2014 [104] and
IEC 60034-2-1 [105]. These standards prescribe specific efficiency
values for the electrical and mechanical power, see Fig. 10, and com-
bine older national standards such as EFF classes and NEMA stand-
ards. Based on these standards, several governments, including all
members of the European Union, stipulate several minimum effi-
ciency classes for specific applications. For example, the European
Commission prescribes the use of at least IE 3 motors for midrange
power applications without inverters (0.75 to 375 kW, except pole
changing motors, motors for special thermal conditions or motors
with more than 8 poles) in the regulation no. 640/2009 [79]. A further
Fig. 10. Efficiency classes for electro-mechanical drives (derived from IEC 60034-30- increase over the IE 4 class of the efficiency requirements for new
1:2014 [104]).
motors can lead to a decline of induction motors in machine tool
applications due to their limited efficiency [14,84,212]. These motors
3.5. Interim conclusion are often used for work spindle drives and auxiliary systems. Alterna-
tives that are more efficient are synchronous reluctance motors or
Most notably, it can be stated that the energy demand of machine synchronous motors. Technical requirements and energy models for
tools is significantly higher than the energy required for the actual the design of drive systems containing motors and inverters or alter-
value-adding chip removal process. The primary reasons for this are native systems, such as soft starters, are defined in the standards EN
losses within the machine tool and the use of auxiliary units for 50598 [60] and EN 61800-9-1 VDE 0160-109-1:2018-1 [61]. In
B. Denkena et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 69 (2020) 646667 652
Fig. 13. Proportion of the shifting force in a four-row ball circulation unit (type: KUVE
25 B) [75]. operational condition [168,215]. Naturally, the efficiency decreases
with increased preload due to friction losses [209].
Regarding the friction behaviour in spindle bearings and linear
Overall, the additional supply systems are one of the main reasons guides, there is already vast knowledge about modelling and optimi-
for the low energy efficiency of the alternative bearing principles in sation of their operational behaviour. Nevertheless, considering the
comparison to ball or roller type spindle bearings. As a result, they steadily increasing requirements for the performance of the machine
are rarely employed in machine tools in comparison to conventional components, the improvement of these friction characteristics is
spindle bearings. ongoing research.
Linear guideways enable translational feed motion during the
manufacturing of components. Rolling elements are usually applied 4.3. Interim conclusion
with high loads and much lower rotational speeds in comparison to
work spindle bearings. In [198] it is stated that the axis drive Even though support units often dominate the energy requirements
accounts for approximately 19% of the total energy demand of the of machine tools, work spindles and feed drives regularly account for a
machine tool. The composition of the shifting force for a linear guide considerable portion of the overall energy demand (see Fig. 9). Although
of the type KUVE 25 B is given in Fig. 13. The diagram shows that the it is generally possible to reduce the weight of movable machine tool
lubricant (37%) and the seals (41%) have the biggest influence on the components through topology optimisation and lightweight materials
friction behaviour of the guide. in order to reduce the energy demand for acceleration and deceleration
Ispaylar stated that besides the friction in the rolling contact [149], design measures concerning the structural components of
point, the friction in the deflectors and inlet zone has to be consid- machine tools are excluded at this point. This is justified by the fact, that
ered. The friction in the wipers in particular, which makes up the expected gains in terms of energy efficiency are rather small when
approximately 50% of the overall friction in the guideway, is the pri- feasible weight savings and common energy shares of the feed drive
mary influence on the losses [112]. Kunc developed a parameterised system are considered (see Section 3.3). A generally valid approach to
friction model. With the friction force Ffric(v,L) measured from four increase the energy efficiency of machine tools is to reduce the operat-
loaded cases referenced to an unloaded case, a speed-dependent ing time by increasing the machining speed, which in turn requires
load factor characteristic can be estimated, which is presented in increased drive and bearing performance. However, in this case a high
Fig. 14 [40]. Consequently, an increased preload also results in energy efficiency of the entire machine tool can only be ensured if
increased friction losses. With regard to stick-slip effects, this influ- energy intensive components are completely switched off when not in
ence has also been validated by Rahmani et al. [171]. Furthermore, use, see Chapter 6. Fig. 16 provides an overview of the most important
Denkena et al. developed and verified a jerk-decoupled feed axis energy efficiency measures for individual main units; Table 1 summa-
model with spring-damper-elements [58]. With an energy-opti- rises relevant literature on the energy efficient design of main units for
mised dimensioning, the energy losses related to the jerk influence machine tools.
can be minimised by up to 50% [98]. Electrical drives typically have a high degree of efficiency. Hence,
Besides linear direct drives, feed drives can also be constructed the efficiency optimisation of servo drives offers only low savings
with ball screws, which transfer rotary motion to linear motion. Ball
screw drives consist of a spindle, rolling elements, a nut and a ball
return system, as well as sealing elements as shown in Fig. 15. They
have a high efficiency which can reach up to 95% depending on the
Fig. 14. Approximation and measurement of the velocity- and load-dependent friction
Fig. 16. Most relevent energy efficiency measure for machine tool main units.
characteristic for a linear guide [40].
655 B. Denkena et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 69 (2020) 646667
Drives in general [11,14,32,84,104,105,124,212] 5.1.1. Hot gas bypass and compressor cooling units
Work spindle [2,6,9,99,140,193] Modern cooling systems consist of a dual circuit as depicted in
Feed drives [15,135,162,184] Fig. 17 [53]. Tempered water is conveyed through the machine tool;
Spindle bearings [35,93,144,186]
Alternative bearing principles [42,74]
the thermal energy of the return flow is transferred to a separate
Linear guides [40,58,75,98,112,198] refrigerant circuit using an evaporator. The gaseous refrigerant is then
Ball screws [168,215] compressed and condensed, thus, withdrawing thermal energy from
the refrigeration circuit. To prevent a temperature drop below a speci-
fied lower limit, a hot gas bypass valve reroutes the refrigerant directly
to the compressor, leading to a highly unfavourable energetic state.
potential. Instead, the appropriate selection of more efficient motor
A standard measure to improve the cooling system’s energy effi-
types represents a promising approach. Moreover, the list of effective
ciency is to install a clocked compressor, which can be switched off,
measures includes software-based changes, such as adjustments of
when not in use [33]. Typically, a 2-point controller is used to switch
the interpolator or PWM preferences and load-dependent adaptation
the compressor on and off as soon as the coolant temperature reaches
of the control parameters.
specified limits. This approach reduces the compressor’s operating
Ball bearings represent the state of the art in conventional
time and increases the energy efficiency compared to continuous
machine tools. Alternative bearing principles are only used in specific
operation with a hot gas bypass. However, the use of clocked com-
applications where their benefits outweigh the additional expenses.
pressors also has noteworthy limitations: The 2-point control inevita-
With ball bearings, a trade-off between the target parameters of
bly leads to temperature fluctuations of the coolant, which, in turn,
applicable feed velocity, achievable precision and resulting friction
affects the thermal errors of the cooled components. Narrow temper-
force (which directly correlates with the energy efficiency) has to be
ature windows and short on/off intervals help to reduce the tempera-
considered. Again, a demand-oriented adaptation of the preload
ture fluctuations; however, frequent switching may affect the
allows for both increased performance and energy efficiency.
compressor’s maintenance intervals and durability.
Mori et al. proposed an on/off control scheme for hot gas bypass
5. Support units
cooling units with fixed switching intervals and investigated the trade-
off between energy efficiency and thermally induced displacement
Usually the support and auxiliary units dominate the overall
[151]. For the proposed approach, the compressor was set to an operat-
energy demand of modern machine tools, see Chapter 3. In terms of
ing point with maximum efficiency in the on state. The results of the
energy efficiency, this represents an undesirable situation, since sup-
experimental investigation show that the energy demand of the cooling
port units do not directly contribute to the value adding process. Nev-
unit was reduced by 25% compared to a state-of-the-art cooling unit
ertheless, they are indispensable to put the machine tool into an
with PID temperature control and hot gas bypass. At the same time, a
operational state. Naturally, reducing the support units’ energy
TCP displacement of 3 mm was measured. Regarding the heat genera-
demand presents a practical approach to increase the overall energy
tion of the coolant pump, an advanced approach included a complete
efficiency of machine tools. However, an essential prerequisite is that
pump cut-off. Here, the cooling unit’s energy demand was reduced by
the implemented energy efficiency measures do not affect process
75% while a TCP displacement of up to 5 mm was measured.
stability and machining results.
Another effective approach to increase the energy efficiency of
The following section describes the main findings and relevant
cooling units is the use of variable speed compressors. Frequency
measures concerning the energy efficient design of machine tool sup-
inverter controlled compressors allow for the specific adjustment of
port units. The subsections address the components that account for
the cooling capacity. As indicated by Mori et al., the efficiency of fre-
the most significant shares of the total energy requirement, i.e.
quency inverter-controlled compressors deteriorates for low cooling
machine cooling, cutting fluid supply, and hydraulic system. Another
capacities [151]. Nevertheless, the modulation of the cooling capacity
subsection outlines further measures concerning support units with
with a variable speed compressor provides the possibility to
a smaller, but not negligible, impact on the total energy demand.
completely eliminate the hot gas bypass. This solution involves fur-
ther investment for frequency inverters and compatible compressors
5.1. Cooling systems
but also yields a significant saving potential of up to 70% [33].
Otherwise, scroll compressors can be used to control the cooling
The main task of cooling systems in machine tools is to dissipate
capacity without a hot gas bypass [8,33,116]. These compressors con-
the generated heat and, thus, to control the temperature of various
sist of two interleaving spirals (Fig. 18). In operation, one spiral follows
components which determine the dimensional quality of the
an eccentric circular path, thus, gradually pumping, compressing and
machined workpiece, e.g. spindles and feed drives, bearings and
pressurising the enclosed medium over a single rotation as shown in
guideways, machine frame and other structural elements as well as
the lower part of Fig. 18.
cutting and hydraulic fluids. Likewise, the machine’s control cabinet,
As a design variant of the conventional scroll compressor, digital
which contains control and power electronics, requires cooling. The
scroll compressors allow for a pressure modulation from 10 to 100%
reliable operation of the cooling system is therefore crucial for main-
taining the required machine tool performance, since local heat
build-up may cause thermally induced displacement of structural
components and may ultimately affect the functionality of sensitive
units or even damage them permanently [144].
In many cases, the cooling system accounts for the most signifi-
cant amount of a machine tool’s electrical energy demand. The refrig-
eration compressor often dominates the energy requirements, fluid
pumps and condenser fans regularly require a lesser amount of elec-
trical energy [33]. Possible approaches to increase the energy effi-
ciency of the cooling systems include the optimisation of individual
components, such as pumps and compressors, and the overall circuit
design. Here, many approaches aim at a need-based design and oper-
ation of the cooling system. Other (indirect) approaches focus on
Fig. 17. Typical compression cooling system with hot gas bypass [101].
reducing the load on the cooling system, e.g. by minimising thermal
B. Denkena et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 69 (2020) 646667 656
Precoat filters present a technological alternative to belt filters but energy efficiency, they provide a sensible solution for applications
require a consistent flow rate for effective operation. Raha €user et al. with high hydraulic power demand [101].
point out current deficits in state-of-the-art filter plants and present a Since machine tools are commonly complex systems, the setup of
retrofit for a demand-based flow rate control in precoat filter systems hydraulic units also becomes more complex, e.g. by including several
[170]. Based on a simulation of an existing plant, a saving potential of pumps and accumulators for low-pressure and high-pressure cycles.
up to 73% was identified. Although the investigations were carried out Accordingly, the application of single measures or the combination of
for a central system supplying several machines within a plant, the several measures may lead to interactions and potential synergies.
results can also be transferred to decentralised filter systems. Even the composition of the hydraulic fluid influences the energy
efficiency of the system [191].
5.3. Hydraulic units Abele et al. demonstrated a reduction of the hydraulic unit’s elec-
trical power demand of 91% for a specified demonstrator process by
Hydraulic units enable various functions in machine tools such as implementing seat valves and accumulators [8]. Hu € lsemeyer con-
tool and palette changes, workpiece clamping as well as weight com- firms that the use of accumulators is the most energy efficient solu-
pensation for vertical axes. Furthermore, they provide hydraulic pres- tion for low hydraulic power demand [101]. Brecher et al. compared
sure for hydrostatic bearings and guides. Typically, hydraulic units a state-of-the-art hydraulic system consisting of two variable dis-
are accountable for up to 10% of the overall electrical energy demand placement pumps for low and high pressure with an optimised
in machine tools [34]. In particular, hydraulic systems exhibit rela- hydraulic unit including a (low pressure) variable displacement
tively high energy requirements in idle times due to leakage losses pump and a pressure intensifier [34]. The optimised setup reduced
[38]. The following measures are available to increase the energy effi- the leakage by 79%, but suffered from a slow response. Further
ciency of hydraulic units: research led to an advanced setup with a variable speed pump (for
high pressures), a pressure intensifier and two separate accumulators
for low- and high-pressure cycles [38,41]. With the optimised unit,
Pressure accumulators and intensifiers (booster), pressure losses in idle mode were reduced by 90% and active power
variable speed pumps, requirements were reduced by 26% compared to the state-of-the-art
variable displacement pumps, hydraulic unit. Furthermore, the optimised unit exhibited a lower
directed seat valves, thermal load. Looking at temperature control of hydraulic fluids in
optimised components in the hydraulic circuit for minimal leakage. general, the results from Section 5.1 apply [139].
Reducing the leakage of the hydraulic system through an opti- 5.4. Other auxiliary units
mised component design and the use of seat valves always leads to
an increase in energy efficiency. Here, the potential savings increases The use of compressed air accounts for up to 10% of the total
with the system pressure. However, the benefits of design changes industrial energy demand in some countries [180]. Even though only
regarding pumps and accumulators heavily depend on the machine a relatively small share is allocated to machine tools, energy optimi-
configuration and the use case. Fig. 22 provides an overview of funda- sation of the compressed air supply network is inevitable to increase
mental design concepts for hydraulic systems in machine tools [101]. the overall energy efficiency. After the supply of liquid media and
Constant speed pumps in combination with hydraulic accumula- temperature control of machine components, the supply of com-
tors present an efficient solution, when hydraulic power demand pressed air for bearings, pneumatics and sealing applications requires
occurs sporadically. The accumulator allows for a fast response and a considerable amount of the total electrical energy demand of
the use of relatively small pumps with low power ratings. Different machine tools [214].
pressure levels can be achieved with multiple accumulators in combi- In general, compressed air systems suffer from a low degree of
nation with a single pump. Moreover, it is possible to deactivate the efficiency. Only 10 to 15% of the energy input is utilised for actual
pump completely when no hydraulic power is required, reducing the work [156]. The main causes for the low efficiency of the compressed
losses to leakage within the hydraulic system [8,101]. However, this air supply are waste heat and, most of all, leakage in connectors,
configuration becomes gradually inefficient when hydraulic power is valves and actuators [214]. The first logical step to evaluate losses is
required more frequently since frequent start-ups of the pump to monitor the air flow at several points in the supply network [92].
increase the thermal load of the hydraulic system. Variable speed Simulation models can be applied to identify the actual compressed
pumps (usually driven by frequency inverters) enable a demand-ori- air requirements of the machine tool for a need-based design and
ented adjustment of the flow rate and of the resulting system pres- control of the network. For example, Mousavi et al. presented a com-
sure. Hence, they provide an energy efficient solution for machine prehensive modelling and control approach [153]. According to their
configurations with fluctuating hydraulic power requirements findings, the most energy efficient approach is to cover the base load
[1, 101]. The lack of an accumulator results in a high power rating of with an appropriately dimensioned fixed speed drive compressor
the pump as well as continuous operation to compensate the leakage. and use variable speed drives to compensate for dynamic loads. Den-
Variable displacement pumps act as an alternative to variable speed kena et al. identified the air volume flow and not the pressure to be
pumps for controlling the hydraulic power without additional fre- the relevant control parameter in compressed air supply networks
quency inverters. They also require electrical energy to compensate [53]. Consequently, they recommended to provide a constant air
for leakage losses and suffer from long reaction times. With regard to mass flow and to increase pressure where required locally, e.g. by
using side channel compressors or rotary piston blowers. Saidur et al.
provided an extensive overview of literature concerning energy use
and savings for compressed air systems [180]. Moreover, Nehler
investigated additional non-energy benefits of energy efficiency
measures in compressed air supply networks [156]. Overall, it is rec-
ommended to reduce the size of the network and the number of con-
nected devices, e.g. by replacing pneumatic actuators with electro-
mechanical actuators.
Another support unit with a certain saving potential is the chip
conveyor. Usually, chip conveyors are continuously active or activated
in timed intervals with no concern for the actual chip production, com-
pare Section 3.1. Utilising process knowledge, such as the actual mate-
rial removal per time unit, allows for the implementation of more
Fig. 22. Basic design concepts for hydraulic units in machine tools [101].
judicious control strategies according to the immediate requirements
659 B. Denkena et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 69 (2020) 646667
of the process [53]. Accordingly, it is possible to fully stop the chip con- replacement of pneumatic and hydraulic actuators with more effi-
veyor in non-productive times or for finishing operations. cient electro-mechanical actuators presents a sensible measure.
Fig. 23 summarises the most relevant measures to increase energy
5.5. Interim conclusion efficiency of auxiliary components.
In an extensive study, Gutowsky et al. analysed and modelled the they showed a deviation of 12% between calculated and measured
variable energy demand with respect to the material removal rate energy demand in machining of an exemplary workpiece. However,
[89]. While the results simplify the actual effect of different process the approach does not consider neither the actual tool trajectory nor
parameters, they allow a comparison of a broad range of manufactur- the tool engagement. Especially trajectory and feed rate optimisation
ing processes. However, Kara and Li pointed out that the used factors of the tool path supports high productivity and, consequently, a high
in the proposed model are not clearly defined and, thus, the model’s utilisation of the machine tool. Moreover, the workpiece quality can
applicability is limited [136]. Therefore, they developed an approach be ensured, which reduces scrap. Examples for optimisation techni-
based on the specific energy demand. They validated their model by ques are given in [16,78,224]. In this context, virtual machining will
experiments and found out that higher Qw lead to a lower specific play an increasingly important role in the future. Similarly,
cutting energy ec. Nevertheless, they stated that the energy demand approaches for online control of the feed rate or chatter suppression
depends strongly on the use case. For example, a higher Qw leads to a are not only beneficial with respect to productivity, but also from an
lower ec, but also to higher temperatures and tool wear and, thus, ecological point of view.
requires the use of cooling lubricant, which, in turn, increases the However, a sole focus on processing time does not consider effects
overall energy demand [122]. It should also be noted that the same on the auxiliary energy demand in the form of tool wear or cutting
Qw can be obtained using different process parameters, e.g. in milling fluid usage. Aggarwal et al. adjusted process parameters in turning
the cutting velocity vc, the tooth feed ft, the cutting width ae and the with regard to the cooling strategy. A minimisation of process param-
cutting depth ap, which have a high influence on spindle load, tool eters in combination with cryogenic cooling led to a minimal energy
wear and process cooling requirements. demand. Here, the cooling strategy had the biggest impact, followed
A more detailed view on the influence of different process param- by depth of cut and cutting velocity [12]. Based on a semi-analytical
eters on the energy demand in milling is given by Draganescu et al. model, Mativenga and Rajemi presented an approach to minimise
[72]. The results show that the depth of cut and the feed per tooth the energy requirement for turning operations by adjusting the mate-
have the highest effect on the specific energy demand. These results rial removal rate. By separating the energy demand into four parts
are supported by Rentsch and Heinzel, who were able to reduce the (setup, material removal, tool change and cutting edge), they were
energy requirement for a milling process by 28 to 35% by doubling also able to consider the embodied energy per used tool [143,172].
the feed rate [176]. Similarly, Yan and Li identified the width of cut as Wang et al. used a non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm to evalu-
the most influencing factor on the cutting energy demand in milling ate the optimum between product quality, manufacturing cost and
within a sensitivity study [219]. Based on these findings, they energy demand, including the embodied energy of tool and cutting
reduced the energy demand by 18% by adjusting the process parame- fluid, to determine cutting depth, feed rate and cutting speed for a
ters while keeping the material removal rate constant. Similar poten- turning process [213].
tials were identified for parameter optimisation in turning [120,138]. Adjusting the macro and micro geometry of the cutting tool as
Schlosser et al. analysed the variation of process parameters in dril- well as its coating can reduce cutting force and the required specific
ling [185]. The main result is an energy saving potential of 5% through cutting energy. However, these effects are rather small compared to
shorter processing times caused by higher feed rates and an the fixed energy share of the process. Thus, cutting tools should be
increased cutting velocity. Regarding grinding processes, Hacksteiner designed to withstand high material removal rates and display long
et al. recommend a high equivalent chip thickness to optimise the tool life in order to maximise the utilisation of the machine tool. A
specific cutting energy [90]. Barrenetxea et al. suggested the use of timely replacement of worn cutting tools can be supported by moni-
process cycles with defined feed and speed profiles to reduce the toring the spindle current [165,227].
energy demand in grinding [24]. In general, it can be summarised
that the material removal rate should be adapted by increasing the 6.3. Process cooling
undeformed chip thickness and width rather than the cutting speed.
However, the required surface quality must always be ensured and Reducing the energy demand of the cutting fluid supply holds a sig-
taken into account when optimising the process parameters. nificant savings potential due to its typically high share of the machine
Aiming to support parameter optimisation in process planning, tool’s overall energy requirement. Although there has been great prog-
energy demand models are widely investigated and parameterised for ress in the area of alternative process cooling strategies [141], conven-
different machining operations, e.g. turning, milling, or grinding. Since tional flood cooling and lately internal high pressure cutting fluid
it has been emphasised in the literature that the environmental impact supply are the predominant concepts used in the industry.
of machine tools results mainly from their demand for electrical
energy, most models are based on this energy form [227]. Generally, a 6.3.1. Efficiency measures for conventional cutting fluid supply
distinction can be made between physical and empirical models. The efficiency of flood cooling systems can be increased by adjust-
Examples for physical energy or power demand models are presented ing the control variables of the cutting fluid supply according to the
in [25] or [154]. However, physical models are difficult to obtain and, cutting conditions [195]. Denkena et al. analysed the flow rate varia-
in most cases, limited to the energy demand closely related to the pro- tion for an internal high-pressure cutting fluid supply in turning,
cess features. Thus, the machine tool, part and tool features or friction milling, and drilling with various cutting speeds and feed rates in
effects are often not taken into account. To consider these factors, consideration of the technological risks, i.e. tool wear. Looking at the
empirical models are very common. Within this group, models can be system characteristics of a machine tool with a variable speed high-
further categorised into static and dynamic, deterministic and stochas- pressure fluid pump (compare Fig. 21), small changes of the cutting
tic, as well as discrete and continuous models. Abele et al. provide an fluid flow rate had a significant impact on the electrical pump power
extensive overview of different modelling approaches [7,76,94,132]. In without affecting tool wear for a given set of cutting parameters.
addition to explicitly formulated empirical models, AI methods are Further investigations focussed on the effects on tool wear and
also used for the identification of non-linear relationships between work spindle power in machining of Ti-6Al-4V with reduced cutting
variables [72]. Examples are given in [31] and [169]. fluid flow rates. The results confirm the potential of a demand-ori-
While these models offer insight into general correlations ented control of the cutting fluid system [56,57]. Based on these
between process parameters and the energy demand, the application results, three approaches to adapt the cutting fluid supply parameters
is usually limited to simple workpiece geometries. In order to evalu- to the actual cutting conditions were presented: a manual setting
ate the energy demand prior to machining in an industrial environ- (Approach 1), a CAx-based adjustment (Approach 2) and a simula-
ment, it becomes necessary to analyse the CNC tool path. This offers tion-based setting (Approach 3). In the manual setting, optimised
the potential to adjust the tool path accordingly and to shorten proc- flow rates for each tool configuration were entered directly into the
essing times by minimising air cutting movements [18,63,173]. Balo- human machine interface. This strategy, though, requires additional
gun et al. developed a framework to parse NC-codes and relate the G- default values in the parameter catalogues of the tool manufacturers.
code fragments to operational states [23]. In an experimental study, The CAx-based approach used process information, like roughing and
661 B. Denkena et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 69 (2020) 646667
in order to reduce the machine operating time or to coordinate systems, cutting fluid supplies and hydraulic units have a decisive
energy intensive operating states of several units. For instance, impact on the overall energy demand. Based on this finding, a definition
adjusting the cutting fluid supply parameters to actual process for energy efficiency of machine tools has been proposed. The definition
requirements via inverter-controlled fluid pumps minimises energy relates the energy demand of the main spindle to the overall energy.
and resource demand [68,106]. The automatic adjustment of the feed Consequently, a high spindle utilisation and a low energy demand of
axis positioning speed in accordance with spindle acceleration and the support units are beneficial. While the definition is easy to apply, it
deceleration times, which is described in Chapter 4, enables energy is limited to electrical energy and does not consider indirect energy
savings of up to 10% [68,152,160]. Alternatively, overlapping of oper- flows, e.g. pressurised air, coolants or tools.
ations [68,106,152], i.e. the specification of a machine code command Aiming to increase energy efficiency of machine tools, approaches
before completing the previous one, or the control of pecking move- for main and support units from research and industry have been
ments [68,160], reduces machining time and, thus, energy demand. reviewed in this paper. The main results are summarised in the respec-
In addition, auxiliary times can be reduced by using precise tactile tive interim conclusions. Nevertheless, several research topics remain:
system for a fast and reliable workpiece setup [71].
Another established approach to increase energy efficiency of Investigation and evaluation for the replacement of pneumatic
machine tools is the use of energy monitoring systems and differenti- and hydraulic components with electromechanical actuators (for a
ated standby modes. Energy monitoring systems allow for the visual- media-free machine tool),
isation, control and strategic optimisation of the machine tool’s robust thermo-mechanical models with low implementation
energy requirements [68,194]. Consequently, this results in distinct effort (e.g. observer-based approaches) for productive use of
standby functions, which automatically switch off peripheral units in warm-up periods,
case of idle times and ultimately minimises the machine tool’s energy intelligent standby modes for machine tool components,
input in non-productive phases [68,71,106,160,194,218]. A more strategies for retrofitting of existing machine tools with more
sophisticated approach considers a strategic machine tool selection, energy efficient components.
e.g. a 5-axis machining centre instead of a series of horizontal
machining centres, to reduce transport efforts and cycle times, lead- Besides the design of machine tools, energy efficiency is largely
ing to energy savings of approximately 8% [161]. determined by their operation. In this regard, process parameters
In recent years, energy efficiency has become an increasingly should be selected to maximise productivity. However, side effects
prominent topic in the machine tool industry. A growing environ- like increased tool wear or higher coolant requirements must be con-
mental awareness, rising energy costs and increasingly specific (and sidered. Moreover, intelligent standby modes are essential to reduce
in the future eventually obligatory) government regulations present energy demand at non-productive times. From the reviewed litera-
relevant incentives to address energy efficiency in production engi- ture, it can also be learned that adaptive cooling supply and (near)
neering. In this context, an investigation carried out by DMG Mori Co. dry machining offer significant potential for energy savings. Despite
Ltd. compared a new machine to a 15-year-old model. The new these potentials, only few applications can be found in the industry,
machine tool used 45% less energy per year, which is equivalent to due to the following open research topics:
2,650 kg CO2 emissions savings [68]. In further work, a modern pro-
duction machine was optimised for energy efficiency with regard to Investigation of process interdependencies, e.g. for productivity
cutting parameters, standby modes, cutting fluid pumps and supply and tool wear, idle times and thermal stability, temperature build-
strategy, which led to energy savings of up to 17% [83]. up and machining accuracy,
Despite the availability of energy efficiency measures in the machine identification of actually required cutting fluid volume and pres-
tool industry, the use in industrial practice falls short of expectations. sure for demand-oriented supply strategies,
Naturally, the decision for or against the procurement of energy effi- further research of minimum quantity lubrication and near dry
ciency features when purchasing or upgrading a machine tool depends machining for a widespread use in the production industry,
on an economic evaluation, which is typically based on the return on CAM tools for energy efficient selection of process parameters, tra-
investment, the payback period, or the net present value [86,87]. The jectory optimisation and adaptive cooling strategies including
return on investment depends on the investment costs and is also influ- self-optimisation based on process data.
enced by the electricity price [134]. Companies regularly demand short
payback periods and the share of energy costs in their total costs is usu- The presented case studies demonstrate that a combination of dif-
ally still low. Moreover, energy-related measures compete with invest- ferent energy efficiency measures may decrease the energy demand
ments in quality- or process-related measures [225]. This makes the between 30% and 52%. It can be summarised that high energy savings
implementation of energy efficiency measures more difficult as they are are technically already feasible. But many of these technologies are
regularly associated with higher costs compared to standard variants still in the prototype stage and not established in industry yet. There-
[148]. In some cases, government institutions provide subsidiaries as an fore, significant effort is recommended to transfer scientific knowl-
incentive to implement energy saving measures [45]. In this context, edge into industrial application. Moreover, specific guidelines (e.g.
Go€tze et al. present an integrated energy-oriented method for the tech- Cecimo or Blue Competence) as well as regulations could help to
nical and economic evaluation of machine tools [88]. speed up implementation. Financial incentives for machine tool users
may also help decrease amortisation time and, thus, increase demand
8. Summary and outlook for energy efficiency measures. Increasing energy efficiency in indus-
try is not only a technical but also an economical and governmental
The growing global energy demand from industry results in signifi- task across national borders.
cant ecological and economical costs. From the reviewed literature, it
can be learned that the design of machine tools and their operation Acknowledgements
have high potential for energy savings in the industrial sector. Looking
at the energy distribution of individual machine tools, the overall energy The authors thank the CIRP community for their technical contri-
demand exceeds the required energy for the actual chip removal pro- butions to this paper. In particular, many thanks are extended to H.-
cess by far. Moreover, even the variable energy demand (which corre- € nshoff for the careful review of the manuscript and the valuable
K. To
lates with the material processing) is relatively small compared to the suggestions in the creation of the paper. Special thanks are dedicated
fixed energy requirement, because of the high energy demand of the to M. Ga€rtner, S. Kehne, R. Kru€ ger, L. Onken and L. Petruschke for the
machine tools’ support units and auxiliary systems. In particular, cooling support in the preparation of this paper.
B. Denkena et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 69 (2020) 646667 664
Advances in Life Cycle Engineering for Sustainable Manufacturing Businesses, [97] Helu M, Behmann B, Meier H, Dornfeld D, Lanza G, Schulze V (2012) Impact of
Springer, Tokyo, 311–316. green machining strategies on achieved surface quality. CIRP Annals 61(1):55–58.
[63] Diaz N, et al. (2010) Machine Tool Design and Operation Strategies for Green [98] Hesse P (2008) Energieeffizientes Relativfu € hrungskonzept fu € r ruckentkoppelte
Manufacturing. In: Proceedings of 4th CIRP International Conference on High Per- Vorschubachsen, PhD-Thesis, Leibniz University Hannover.
formance Cutting, 271–276. [99] Heyers C (2013) Energieeffizienter Betrieb von Asynchron-Hauptspindelantrie-
[64] Diaz N, Redelsheimer E, Dornfeld D (2011) Energy Consumption Characteriza- ben in Werkzeugmaschinen. PhD-Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Apprimus.
tion and Reduction Strategies for Milling Machine Tool Use. Globalized Solutions [100] Hu S, Liu F, He Y, PENG B (2010) Characteristics of Additional Load Losses of
for Sustainability in Manufacturing, Springer, Berlin263–267. Spindle System of Machine Tools. Journal of Advanced Mechanical Design, Systems
[65] Dictionary.com (2018) Efficiency. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/efficiency and Manufacturing 4(7):1221–1233.
(accessed on 19.07.2018) [101] Hu€ lsemeyer L (2016) Energieeffizienz spanender Werkzeugmaschinen und
[66] Dietmair A, Verl A (2010) Energy Consumption Assessment and Optimisation in bedarfsgerechter Betrieb am Beispiel der inneren Ku € hlschmierstoffzufuhr. PhD-
the Design and Use Phase of Machine Tools. In: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP Inter- Thesis, Leibniz University Hannover.
national Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, 116–121. [102] International Energy Agency (IEA), Key World Energy Statistics 2017, 2017.
[67] Dietmair A, Verl A (2009) Energy Consumption Forecasting and Optimisation for https://doi.org/10.1787/key_energ_stat-2017-en
Machine Tools. Modern Machinery Science Journal 01:63–67. [103] International Energy Agency (IEA), Energy Efficiency: Industry, 2019. https://
[68] DMG Mori Seiki Co. Ltd. (2014) DMG MORI Going Green with New Energy-Saving www.iea.org/topics/energyefficiency/industry/ (accessed on 29.07.2019)
Functions. https://www.dmgmori.co.jp/corporate/en/news/pdf/20140905_ener- [104] IEC (2014) Rotating electrical machines - Part 30-1: Efficiency classes of line
gy_e.pdf (accessed on 11.12.2018) operated AC motors (IE code)(60034-30-1:2014). NEN, Geneva.
[69] Do€bbeler B, Klocke F (2017) Process Oriented Choice of Lubricant Pressure and [105] IEC Rotating electrical machines - Part 2-1: Standard methods for determining
Volume Flow to Increase Machining Process Efficiency. Procedia Manufacturing losses and efficiency from tests (excluding machines for traction vehicles)
8:361–368. (60034-2-1), NEN Geneva.
[70] Donmez MA, Hahn MH, Soons JA (2007) A Novel Cooling System to Reduce Ther- [106] INDEX-Werke GmbH & Co.KG Hahn & Tessky (2019) ECO concept. https://www.
mally-Induced Errors of Machine Tools. CIRP Annals 56(1):521–524. index-werke.de/fileadmin/user_upload/technology/energy/Eco_fluid_Bro-
[71] Dr. Johannes Heidenhain GmbH. Technische Information - Aspekte der Energieef- schuere.pdf (accessed on 11.06.2019)
fizienz von Werkzeugmaschinen. https://www.heidenhain.de/fileadmin/pdb/ [107] Industrieanzeiger (2019) Energieeffizienz: Viel Potenzial an Werkzeugmaschi-
media/img/751261_00_Energieeffizienz_WZM_de.pdf (accessed on 11.06.2019) nen aufgedeckt und genutzt Verbrauch auf Bedarf reduziert. https://industriean-
[72] Draganescu F, Gheorghe M, Doicin CV (2003) Models of machine tool efficiency zeiger.industrie.de/technik/fertigung/verbrauch-auf-bedarf-reduziert/
and specific consumed energy. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 141 (Accessed on 27.01.2019).
(1):9–15. [108] International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Global Warming of 1.5°, Special
[73] Duflou JR, Sutherland JW, Dornfeld D, Herrmann C, Jeswiet J, Kara S, Hauschild report, 2018. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2019/06/SR15_
M, Kellens K (2012) Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: A Full_Report_High_Res.pdf (accessed on 18.06.2020)
processes and systems approach. CIRP Annals 61(2):587–609. [109] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 14955-1: Machine tools
[74] Dupont R (2015) Robust rotor dynamics for high-speed air bearing spindles. Pre- – Environmental evaluation of machine tools: Part 1: Design methodology for
cision Engineering 40:7–13. energy-efficient machine tools, ISO standard 2017, Beuth, Berlin.
[75] Dresdner Freundeskreis der Werkzeugmaschinen- und Steuerungstechnik [110] ISO 14955-2: Machine tools – Environmental evaluation of machine tools: Part 2:
(DWM e.V.) (Ed.), Energieeffiziente Linearachsen für die Werkzeugmaschine. Methods for measuring energy supplied to machine tools and machine tool compo-
Profilschienenführungen in Werkzeugmaschinen: Produktinnovationen - Anwen- nents, ISO standard, 2018, Beuth, Berlin.
dungserfahrungen – Randbedingungen, 30.09.–01.10.2020, Dresden. [111] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). SO/DIS 14955-3: Machine
[76] Abele Eberhard, Schraml Philipp, Eisele Christian (2012) Abscha €tzung des Energie- tools – Environmental evaluation of machine tools: Part 3: Principles for testing
verbrauchs durch Kennfelder. Productivity Management 17(4):26–28. GITO, Berlin. metal-cutting machine tools with respect to energy efficiency, ISO standard, 2019,
[77] Eisele C (2014) Simulationsgestu € tzte Optimierung des elektrischen Energiebe- Beuth, Berlin.
darfs spanender Werkzeugmaschinen. PhD-Thesis, Technical University of [112] Ispaylar H (1996) Betriebseigenschaften von Profilschienen-Wa €lzfu€ hrungen. PhD-
Darmstadt. Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen.
[78] Erkokmaz K, Layegh SE, Lazoglu I, Erdim H (2013) Feedrate optimization for [113] Jawahir IS, Attia H, Biermann D, Duflou J, Klocke F, Meyer D, Newman ST, Pusa-
freeform milling considering constraints from the feed drive system and process vec F, Putz M, Rech J, Schulze V, Umbrello D (2016) Cryogenic Manufacturing
mechanics. CRIP Annals 62(1):395–398. Processes. CIRP Annals 65(2):713–736.
[79] European Commission. Regulation 640/2009. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal- [114] Jedrzejewski J, Kwasny W (2011) Study on Reducing Energy Consumption in
content/DE/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32009R0640 (accessed on 02.03.2020) Manufacturing Systems. Journal of Machine Engineering 11(3):7–20.
[80] Eyran A (2014) Eco Manufactured transportation means from Clean and Competi- [115] Jedrzejewski J, Kowal Z, Kwasny W, Modrzycki W (2005) High-Speed Precise
tive Factory: Project Final Report. EMC2-Factory. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/ Machine Tools Spindle Units Improving. Journal of Materials Processing Technol-
rcn/101388/reporting/en (accessed on 29.07.2019). ogy 162(163):615–621.
[81] Filippi A de, Ippolito R (1980) Forecast of the Electric Energy Requirement in a [116] Jiang Z, Harrison DK, Cheng K (2003) Computer-Aided Design and Manufactur-
Mechanical Plant by Using a Stochastic Model. CIRP Annals 29(1):285–288. ing Of Scroll Compressors. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 138(1-
[82] Fratila D (2010) Macro-Level Environmental Comparison of Near-Dry Machining 3):145–151.
and Flood Machining. Journal of Cleaner Production 18(10-11):1031–1039. [117] Junge F, Abele E, Vogel F (2017) Qualification of Aqueous Part Cleaning Machines
[83] Fujishima M, Shimanoe H, Mori M (2017) Reducing the Energy Consumption of for the Use of Waste Heat in Industrial Production Companies. Procedia CIRP
Machine Tools. International Journal of Automation Technology 11(4):601–607. 61:570–575.
[84] Gavrila H, Manescu V, Paltanea G, Scutaru G, Peter I (2017) New Trends in [118] Junge F, Helfert M, Abele E, Vogel F (2017) Increase in Energy Efficiency of Indus-
Energy Efficient Electrical Machines. Procedia Engineering 181:568–574. trial Production Processes through Thermal Crosslinking of Cutting-Machine
[85] Ghadimi P, Li W, Kara S, Herrmann C (2014) Integrated Material and Energy Flow Tools and Cleaning Machines by Heat-Pump Technology. In: Proceedings of the
Analysis towards Energy Efficient Manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 15:117–122. 12th IEA Heat Pump Conference, P.3.7.7.
[86] Gontarz A, Schudeleit T, Wegener K (2015) Framework of a Machine Tool Con- [119] Kaminski J, Alvelid B (2000) Temperature Reduction in the Cutting Zone in
figurator for Energy Efficiency. Procedia CIRP 26:706–711. Water-Jet Assisted Turning. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 106(1-
[87] Gontarz AM, Ha €nni F, Weiss LB, Wegener K (2013) Machine Tool Optimiza- 3):68–73.
tion Strategies for Ecologic and Economic Efficiency. In: Proceedings of the [120] Kant G, Sangwan KS (2014) Prediction and Optimization of Machining Parame-
Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufac- ters for Minimizing Power Consumption and Surface Roughness in Machining.
ture, 54–61. Journal of Cleaner Production 83:151–164.
[88] Go€ tze U, Koriath H-J, Kolesnikov A, Lindner R, Paetzold J (2012) Integrated Meth- [121] Kara S, Bogdanski G, Li W (2011) Electricity Metering and Monitoring in
odology for the Evaluation of the Energy- and Cost-Effectiveness of Machine Manufacturing Systems. Globalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufacturing,
Tools. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 5(3):151–163. Springer, Berlin: 1–10.
[89] Gutowski TG, Dahmus JB, Thiriez A (2006) Electrical Energy Requirements for [122] Kara S, Li W (2011) Unit Process Energy Consumption Models for Material
Manufacturing Processes. In: Proceedings of the 13th CIRP International Confer- Removal Processes. CIRP Annals 60(1):37–40.
ence of Life Cycle Engineering, 31.05.02.06.2006, Leuven. [123] Kianinejad K, Uhlmann E, Peukert B (2015) Investigation into Energy Efficiency
[90] Hacksteiner M, Peherstorfer H, Bleicher F (2018) Energy efficiency of state-of- of Outdated Cutting Machine Tools and Identification of Improvement Potentials
the-art grinding processes. Procedia Manufacturing 21:717–724. to Promote Sustainability. Procedia CIRP 26:533–538.
[91] Halevi Y, Carpanzano E, Montalbano G, Koren Y (2011) Minimum energy control [124] Kioskeridis I, Margaris N (1996) Loss minimization in induction motor adjust-
of redundant actuation machine tools. CIRP Annals 60(1):433–436. able-speed drives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 43(1):226–231.
[92] Harris P, Nolan S, O’Donnell GE, Meskell C (2013) Optimising Compressed Air [125] Klocke F, Lung D, Kra €mer A, Cayli T, Sangermann H (2013) Potential of Modern
System Energy Efficiency The Role of Flow Metering and Exergy Analysis. Re- Lubricoolant Strategies on Cutting Performance. Key Engineering Materials 554-
engineering Manufacturing for Sustainability, Springer, Singapore: 129–134. 557:2062–2071.
[93] He Y, Liu F, Wu T, Zhong F-P, Peng B (2011) Analysis and estimation of energy [126] Klocke F, Lung D, Sangermann H, Cayli T (2013) Steigerung der Produktivität und
consumption for numerical control machining. In: Proceedings of the Institution Prozesssicherheit bei der Drehbearbeitung von Stählen durch den energieeffizienten
of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 255–266. Einsatz der Hochdruck-Kühlschmierstoff-Zufuhr, Report. RWTH Aachen Univer-
[94] Heinemann T, Schraml P, Thiede S, Eisele C, Herrmann C, Abele E (2014) Hierar- sity.
chical Evaluation of Environmental Impacts from Manufacturing System and [127] Klocke F, Schlosser R, Sangermann H (2012) Evaluation of the Energy Consump-
Machine Perspective. Procedia CIRP 15:141–146. tion of a Directed Lubricoolant Supply with Variable Pressures and Flow Rates in
[95] Heinzel C, Meyer D, Kolkwitz B, Eckebrecht J (2015) Advanced Approach for a Cutting Processes. Sustainable Manufacturing, Springer, Berlin:203–209.
Demand-Oriented Fluid Supply in Grinding. CIRP Annals 64(1):333–336. [128] Koyama M, Fujii T, Uchida R, Kawabata T (1992) Space voltage vector-based new
[96] Helfert M, Weber M (2018) Energieeffiziente Zerspanung mit Werkzeugmaschi- PWM method for large capacity three-level GTO inverter. In: Proceedings of the
nen. ETA - die Modell-Farbrik, Energieeffizienz Weiter Gedacht, Report, Technical 1992 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control, Instrumentation,
University of Darmstadt 1316. and Automation, 271–276.
B. Denkena et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 69 (2020) 646667 666
[129] Kramer MJ, McCallum RW, Anderson IA, Constantinides S (2012) Prospects for [162] Okwudire C, Rodgers J (2013) Design and Control of a Novel Hybrid Feed Drive
Non-Rare Earth Permanent Magnets for Traction Motors and Generators. Journal for High Performance and Energy Efficient Machining. CIRP Annals 62(1):
of The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society 64(7):752–763. 391–394.
[130] Kreitlein S, Kupfer I, Mu € hlbauer M, Franke J (2015) The Relative Energy Effi- [163] Patterson MG (1996) What is Energy Efficiency? Concepts, Indicators and Meth-
ciency as Standard for Evaluating the Energy Efficiency of Production Processes odological Issues. Energy Policy 24:377–390.
Based on the Least Energy Demand. Applied Mechanics and Materials 805:11–18. [164] Peick H, Filtration device, Patent application DE102013006107A1, 2014.
[131] Kuhrke B (2011) Methode zur Energie- und Medienbedarfsbewertung spa- [165] Peng T, Xu X (2014) Energy-Efficient Machining Systems: A Critical Review.
nender Werkzeugmaschinen, PhD-Thesis, Technical University of Darmstadt. International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology 72(9-12):1389–1406.
[132] Kuhrke B, Schrems S, Eisele C, Abele E (2010) Methodology to assess the energy [166] Popp RSH, Liebl C, Zaeh MF (2018) A Multi-level Procedure to Evaluate the
consumption of cutting machine tools. In: Proceedings of the 17th CIRP LCE Con- Energy Flexibility Potential of Production Machines. Procedia CIRP 67:75–80.
ference, 76–82. [167] Popp RSH, Zaeh MF (2014) Determination of the Technical Energy Flexibility of
[133] Laptev I, Zahn P, Pritschow G (2015) Direct sliding mode current control of feed Production Systems. Advanced Materials Research 1018:365–372.
drives. CIRP Annals 64(1):373–376. [168] Puiu G, Olaru D, Puiu V (2004) Friction Torque and Efficiency in Ball-Screw Sys-
[134] Lenz J, Kotschenreuther J, Westka €mper E (2017) Energy Efficiency in Machine tems. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Tribology, 25–29.
Tool Operation by Online Energy Monitoring Capturing and Analysis. Procedia [169] Quintana G, Ciurana J, Ribatallada J (2011) Modelling Power Consumption in
CIRP 61:365–369. Ball-End Milling Operations. Materials and Manufacturing Processes 26(5):
[135] Li W (2015) Efficiency of Manufacturing Processes: Energy and Ecological Perspec- 746–756.
tives. Springer, Switzerland. [170] Rah€auser R, Klemm P, Verl A, Kircher C (2013) Increasing the energy Efficiency in
[136] Li W, Kara S (2011) An empirical model for predicting energy consumption of Metal Cutting Manufacturing through Demand Based Coolant Filtration. In: Pro-
manufacturing processes: a case of turning process. In: Proceedings of the Institu- ceedings of the 20th CIRP International Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Re-
tion of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 1636– engineering Manufacturing for Sustainability, 233239.
1646. [171] Rahmani M, Krall S, Bleicher F (2015) Experimental Investigations on Stick-Slip
[137] Li W, Zein A, Kara S, Herrmann C (2011) An Investigation into Fixed Energy Con- Phenomenon and Friction Characteristics of Linear Guides. Procedia Engineering
sumption of Machine Tools. Globalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufactur- 100:1023–1031.
ing, Springer, Berlin:268–273. [172] Rajemi MF, Mativenga PT, Aramcharoen A (2010) Sustainable Machining: Selec-
[138] Lin CL (2004) Use of the Taguchi Method and Grey Relational Analysis to Opti- tion of Optimum Turning Conditions Based on Minimum Energy Considerations.
mize Turning Operations with Mutiple Performance Characteristics. Materials Journal of Cleaner Production 18(10-11):1059–1065.
and Manufacturing Processes 19(2):209–220. [173] Rangarajan A, Dornfeld D (2004) Efficient Tool Paths and Part Orientation for
[139] Lu C-H, Tsai C-C (2008) Adaptive Predictive Control With Recurrent Neural Net- Face Milling. CIRP Annals 53(1):73–76.
work for Industrial Processes: An Application to Temperature Control of a Vari- [174] Rasch FO, Vigeland T, Bjørke Ø(1981) Hydraulic Chipbreaking. CIRP Annals 30(1):
able-Frequency Oil-Cooling Machine. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 333335.
55(3):1366–1375. [175] Regel J, Xu Du, Bra €unig M, Wittstock V, Putz M (2018) Evaluation of Thermo-
[140] Lv J, Tang R, Tang W, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Jia S (2017) An investigation into reducing Energetic Behavior for demand-Oriented Operating of Machine Tool Cooling
the spindle acceleration energy consumption of machine tools. Journal of Cleaner Systems. Procedia Manufacturing 21:213–220.
Production 143:794–803. [176] Rentsch R, Heinzel C (2015) Development of a Discrete Event Model for Energy
[141] Madanchi N, Kurle D, Winter M, Thiede S, Herrmann C (2015) Energy Efficient and Resource Efficient Milling. Procedia CIRP 31:441–446.
Process Chain: The Impact of Cutting Fluid Strategies. Procedia CIRP 29:360–365. [177] Riemer B, Herold T, Hameyer K (2012) Impact Assessment of Machine Tool Aux-
[142] Madanchi N, Winter M, Thiede S, Herrmann C (2017) Energy Efficient Cutting iliary Drives Oversizing to Energy Efficiency Aspects. Sustainable Manufacturing,
Fluid Supply: The Impact of Nozzle Design. Procedia CIRP 61:564–569. Springer, Berlin:77–81.
[143] Mativenga PT, Rajemi MF (2011) Calculation of Optimum Cutting Parameters [178] Rossaint J (2014) Steigerung der Leistungsfa €higkeit von Spindellagern durch opti-
Based on Minimum Energy Footprint. CIRP Annals 60(1):149–152. mierte Lagergeometrien. PhD-Thesis, RWTH Aachen Apprimus.
[144] Mayr J, Jedrzejewski J, Uhlmann E, Alkan Donmez M, Knapp W, Ha €rtig F, Wendt [179] Rothenbu € cher S, Schiffler A, Bauer J (2019) Die Speisung macht’s, Werkstatt
K, Moriwaki T, Shore P, Schmitt R, Brecher C, Wu € rz T, Wegener K (2012) Thermal +Betrieb: 62–65.
Issues in Machine Tools. CIRP Annals 61(2):771–791. [180] Saidur R, Rahim NA, Hasanuzzaman M (2010) A Review on Compressed-Air
[145] Meadows DH, Randers J, Meadows DL (2004) The Limits to Growth: The 30-year Energy Use and Energy Savings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14
Update. (4):1135–1153.
[146] Melfi MJ (2009) Quantifying the Energy Efficiency of Motors Fed by Adjust- [181] Salgado DR, Alonso FJ (2008) Optimal Machine Tool Spindle Drive Gearbox
able Frequency Inverters. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Petroleum and Design. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 37(9-
Chemical Industry Conference, 14.16.09.2009, Industry Applications Society, 10):851–860.
Anaheim, 1–7. [182] Sangermann H (2013) Hochdruck-Ku € hlschmierstoffzufuhr in der Zerspanung.
[147] Mert G, Waltemode S, Aurich JC (2015) How Services Influence the Energy Effi- PhD-Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Apprimus.
ciency of Machine Tools: A Case Study of a Machine Tool Manufacturer. Procedia [183] Schischke K (2012) Energy-Using Product Group Analysis - Lot 5: Machine tools
CIRP 29:287–292. and related machinery. Report, Fraunhofer IZM, Berlin.
[148] Meyer F (2014) Making Machine Tools Work More efficiently: Researchers are [184] Schleinkofer U, Laufer F, Zimmermann M, Roth D, Bauernhansl T (2018)
Reducing the Energy Consumption of Modern Machining Centres. http://www. Resource-Efficient Manufacturing Systems Through Lightweight Construction
bine.info/fileadmin/content/Publikationen/Projekt-Infos/2014/Projekt_03-2014/ by Using a Combined Development Approach. Procedia CIRP 72:856–861.
ProjektInfo_0314_engl_internetx.pdf (accessed on 27.06.2019). [185] Schlosser R, Klocke F, Lung D (2011) Sustainabilty in Manufacturing Energy
[149] Mo € hring HC, Brecher C, Abele E, Fleischer J, Bleicher F (2015) Materials in Consumption of Cutting Processes, Springer, Berlin.
machine tool structures. CIRP Annals 64(2):725–748. [186] Schmidt H, Schwartz J (2014) Energy-Efficient Minimal Quantity Lubrication for
[150] Moradnazhad M, Unver HO (2017) Energy Consumption Characteristics of Turn- High-Speed Spindles. Evolution . http://evolution.skf.com/us/energy-efficient-mini-
Mill Machining. International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology 91(5- mal-quantity-lubrication-for-high-speed-spindles/ (Accessed on 11.09.2014).
8):1991–2016. [187] Schott P, Ahrens R, Bauer D, Hering F, Keller R, Pullmann J, Schel D, Schimmelp-
[151] Mori K, Bergmann B, Kono D, Denkena B, Matsubara A (2019) Energy Efficiency fennig J, Simon P, Weber T, Abele E, Bauernhansl T, Fridgen G, Jarke M, Reinhart
Improvement of Machine Tool Spindle Cooling System with OnOff Control. G (2018) Flexible IT Platform for Synchronizing Energy Demands with Volatile
CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 25:14–21. Markets. it - Information Technology 60(3):155–164.
[152] Mori M, Fujishima M, Inamasu Y, Oda Y (2011) A Study on Energy Efficiency [188] Schudeleit T, Zu € st S, Weiss L, Wegener K (2016) The Total Energy Efficiency
Improvement for Machine Tools. CIRP Annals 60(1):145–148. Index for Machine Tools. Energy 102:682–693.
[153] Mousavi S, Kara S, Kornfeld B (2014) Energy Efficiency of Compressed Air Sys- [189] Schulz J, Popp RS-H, Scharmer VM, Zaeh MF (2018) An IoT Based Approach for
tems. Procedia CIRP 15:313–318. Energy Flexible Control of Production Systems. Procedia CIRP 69:650–655.
[154] Munoz AA, Sheng P (1995) An Analytical Approach for Determining the Environ- [190] Schulz M, Lambertz L, Marquardt R (2013) Dimensioning of Modular High Fre-
mental Impact of Machining Processes. Journal of Materials Processing Technology quency converter for drives. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Annual International
53(3-4):736–758. Energy Conversion Congress and Exhibition in the Asia Pacific Region,
[155] NEFF Gewindetriebe GmbH (2018) Gewindetriebe und Spindelhubgetriebe 02/ 03.06.06.2013, Melbourne, 675–680.
2018. https://www.neff-gewindetriebe.de/fileadmin/Servicecenter/Kataloge/ [191] Shell Lubricants. Energy-Efficient Hydraulic Fluid. World Pumps 8:8.
20180222_Kat_D_Downloadversion.pdf (accessed on 11.07.2019) [192] Shivakumar EG, Somasekhar VT, Mohapatra KK, Gopakumar K, Umanand L,
[156] Nehler T (2018) Linking Energy Efficiency Measures in Industrial Compressed Sinha SK (2001) A Multi Level Space Phasor Based PWM Strategy for an Open-
Air Systems with Non-Energy Benefits A Review. Renewable and Sustainable End Winding Induction Motor Drive Using Two Inverters with Different DC Link
Energy Reviews 89:72–87. Voltages. In: Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Power Elec-
[157] Neugebauer R, Wabner M, Rentzsch H, Ihlenfeldt S (2011) Structure Principles of tronics and Drive Systems, 25.10.2001, Denpasar, 169–175.
Energy Efficient Machine Tools. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Tech- [193] Sielaff T (2017) Zum Einsatz von Synchronreluktanzmotoren in Motorspindeln fu €r
nology 4(2):136–147. Universal-Bearbeitungszentren, PhD-Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, Shaker.
[158] Neugebauer R, Wertheim R, Hochmuth C, Schmidt G, Dix M (2010) Modelling of [194] Siemens AG (2011) SINUMERIK Ctrl-Energy: Maximum Energy Efficiency for the
Energy and Resource-Efficient Machining. In: Proceedings of the CIRP Conference Machine Tool. https://c4b.gss.siemens.com/resources/articles/e20001-a1440-
of High Performance Cutting, 295–300. p610-x-7600.pdf (Accessed on 03.04.2020)
[159] Newman ST, Nassehi A, Imani-Asrai R, Dhokia V (2012) Energy Efficient Process [195] Sokovic M, Mijanovic K (2001) Ecological Aspects of the Cutting Fluids and its
Planning for CNC Machining. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technol- Influence on Quantifiable Parameters of the Cutting Processes. Journal of Materi-
ogy 5(2):127–136. als Processing Technology 109(1-2):181–189.
[160] Oda Y, Fujishima M, Kawamura Y, Hideta M (2012) Energy Reduction of Machine [196] Sozer Y, Torrey DA, Reva S (2000) New Inverter Output Filter Topology for PWM
Tools. Key Engineering Materials 523-524:985–990. Motor Drives. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 15(6):1007–1017.
[161] Oda Y, Kawamura Y, Fujishima M (2012) Energy Consumption Reduction by [197] Sparks T, Chase G (2016) Filters and Filtration Handbook, Butterworth-Heine-
Machining Process Improvement. Procedia CIRP 4:120–124. mann, Oxford.
667 B. Denkena et al. / CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 69 (2020) 646667
[198] Technische Informationsbibliothek (TIB) (2019) Energiebedarfsoptimierte [213] Wang Q, Liu F, Wang X (2014) Multi-Objective Optimization of Machining
Motorspindel und angepasster elektrischer elektroscher Antriebsstrang https:// Parameters Considering Energy Consumption. Journal of Advanced Mechanical
www.tib.eu/de/suchen/id/TIBKAT%3A779026217/Energiebedarfsoptimierte- Design, Systems and Manufacturing 71:1133–1142.
Motorspindel-und-angepasster/ (accessed on 23.01.2019) [214] Wegener K, Mayr J, Merklein M, Behrens B-A, Aoyama T, Sulitka M, Fleischer J,
[199] Thiede S, Bogdanski G, Herrmann C (2012) A Systematic Method for Increasing Groche P, Kaftanoglu B, Jochum N, Mo € hring HC (2017) Fluid Elements in
the Energy and Resource Efficiency in Manufacturing Companies. Procedia CIRP Machine Tools. CIRP Annals 66(2):611–634.
2:28–33. [215] Wei C, Lai R (2011) Kinematical Analyses and Transmission Efficiency of a Pre-
€ nshoff H-K (1995) Werkzeugmaschinen: Grundlagen, Springer, Berlin.
[200] To loaded Ball Screw Operating at High Rotational Speeds. Mechanism and Machine
[201] Triebe MJ, Mendis GP, Zhao F, Sutherland JW (2018) Understanding Energy Theory 7:880–898.
Consumption in a Machine Tool through Energy Mapping. Procedia CIRP [216] Weinert K, Inasaki I, Sutherland JW, Wakabayashi T (2004) Dry Machining and
69:259–264. Minimum Quantity Lubrication. CIRP Annals 53(2):511–537.
[202] Triebe MJ, Zhao F, Sutherland JW (2019) Achieving Energy Efficient Machine Tools [217] Welsch A (2010) DE102010056567A1: Liquid-air cooling system. Patent.
by Mass Reduction through Multi-Objective Optimization. Procedia CIRP 80:73–78. [218] Yamazaki Mazak UK Ltd. (2019) Advanced Technology & Environmentally
[203] U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), International Energy Outlook Friendly. https://www.mazakeu.co.uk/machines-technology/technology/eco-
2017, 2017. https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/0484(2017).pdf (accessed on friendly/ (Accessed on 11.06.2019)
18.06.2020) [219] Yan J, Li L (2013) Multi-Objective Optimization of Milling Parameters the
[204] U.S. Energy Information Administration. Office of Energy Consumption and Efficiency Trade-Offs Between Energy, Production Rate and Cutting Quality. Journal of
Statistics. Manufacturing Energy Consumption Survey. (Accessed on 02.11.2018). Cleaner Production 52:462–471.
[205] Umweltbundesamt (2019) Stromverbrauch: Entwicklung des Stromverbrauchs [220] Yang F, Taylor AR, Bai H, Cheng B, Khan AA (2015) Using dq Transformation to
nach Sektoren. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/energie/stromver- Vary the Switching Frequency for Interior Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
brauch (Accessed on 29.07.2019) Drive Systems. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification 1(3):277–286.
[206] van de Beld C (2018) The scroll compressor: quiet and easy. http://theworkshopcom- [221] Yoon H-S, Lee J-Y, Kim H-S, Kim M-S, Kim E-S, Shin Y-J, Chu W-S, Ahn S-H (2014)
pressor.com/learn/compressor-types/scroll-compressor/ (Accessed on 08.12.2018) A Comparison of Energy Consumption in Bulk Forming, Subtractive, and Addi-
[207] Verband Deutscher Maschinen- und Anlagenbau e.V.. VDMA 34179:2019-04: tive Processes: Review and Case Study. International Journal of Precision Engi-
Measurement instruction to determine the energy- and resource demand of neering and Manufacturing-Green Technology 1(3):261–279.
machine tools for mass production, Beuth, Berlin. [222] Yoon H-S, Moon J-S, Pham M-Q, Lee G-B, Ahn S-H (2013) Control of Machining
[208] Verein Deutscher Werkzeugmaschinen (VDW), Market Report 2015: The Ger- Parameters for Energy and Cost Savings in Micro-Scale Drilling of PCBs. Journal
man Machine Tool Industry and its Position in the World Market, 2015. https:// of Cleaner Production 54:41–48.
wzm.vdma.org/documents/106072/650870/pub_vdw%20marktbericht_2015. [223] Yoshitsugu J, Inoue K, Hiraki E, Nakaoka M (2001) Resonant DC link snubber-
pdf/6b0c9689-da6e-4384-9fcc-2324e45e3c99 (accessed on 18,06.2020) assisted soft switching inverter type AC servo driver with low common mode
[209] Verl A, Frey S (2010) Correlation between feed velocity and preloading in ball current characteristics. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Internationl Conference on
screw drives. CIRP Annals 59(1):429–432. Power Electronics and Drive Systems, Piscataway, 494–499.
[210] Verl A, (Ed.) (2016) Steuerung des Energiebedarfs in der Fertigung und Steigerung [224] Yuen A, Zhang K, Altintas Y (2013) Smooth trajectory generation for five-axis
der Energieeffizienz durch Automatisierung: Abschlussbericht FOR 1088 ECOMA- machine tools. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 71:11–19.
TION. Report, VDI, Du € sseldorf. [225] Zein A (2012) Transition Towards Energy Efficient Machine Tools, Springer; Berlin.
[211] Vijayaraghavan A, Dornfeld D (2010) Automated Energy Monitoring of Machine [226] Zhao GY, Liu ZY, He Y, Cao HJ, Guo YB (2017) Energy Consumption in Machining:
Tools. CIRP Annals 59(1):21–24. Classification, Prediction, and Reduction Strategy. Energy 133:142–157.
[212] Waide P, Brunner CU (2011) Energy-Efficiency Policy Opportunities for Electric [227] Zhou L, Li J, Li F, Meng Q, Li J, Xu X (2016) Energy Consumption Model and
Motor-Driven Systems. IEA Energy Papers 7. https://doi.org/10.1787/5kgg52gb9gjd- Energy Efficiency of Machine Tools: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Journal
en. (Accessed on 02.03.2020). of Cleaner Production 112:3721–3734.