Detailed Notes - Consuming Energy Resources - Edexcel Geography GCSE
Detailed Notes - Consuming Energy Resources - Edexcel Geography GCSE
Each source comes with their own benefits and risks, so governments have to weigh up the pros
and cons before choosing an energy source. Often, countries use a mix of energies so they don’t
rely on one source.
Description: Fuels that take thousands of Description: Using Uranium (through nuclear
years to form underground, from dead fission) to produce energy
vegetation and animals. Very reliable output of energy, so
Cheap to mine good base energy source throughout
High demand, since fossil fuels can the year
be used in all countries and provide a Risk of radiation poisoning if
reliable source of energy uncontrolled (Chernobyl)
Polluting - releases carbon dioxide Any waste must be sealed in
and methane, which contributes to concrete and glass, and left
Global Warming underground for hundreds of years
Non-renewable, so limited supply left When the power station is finished, it
of coal is expensive to decommission
Solar Power Wind Power
Description: Panels that convert the sun’s Description: Wind drives large turbines and
energy into electricity generators that produce electricity
Costs are decreasing rapidly Low running costs
Large potential in desert areas Can be used year round
Not very efficient yet (15-20%) Plenty of suitable sites
Effectiveness dependent on Bird life can be affected
climate and time of the year and day Weather dependent
Description: Waves force a turbine to rotate Description: Incoming tides drive turbines in
and produce energy - or other similar method similar way to hydropower
Produce most electricity during Has significant potential
winter when demand is highest Reliable source of energy
Pioneer projects are once installed
commencing across the globe Very expensive
Very expensive and a ‘perfect’ Few schemes currently
solution is yet to be created operating inthe world
Needs to survive storms Impact on marine life
Hydroelectric Power (HEP) Biomass/ Biofuel
Description: Water from a reservoir pushes Description: Vegetation and waste food can
turbines built within a dam, as it escapes be burned (as pellets or directly into the fire)
downhill Cheap and easy to find
Dams built for reservoirs can also Biofuel is a renewable alternative
generate electricity, improving clean to oil, which doesn’t require car
water and energy supplies engines to be modified
Large dams are expensive to build Vegetation must be found
Disrupts fish migration along the sustainably, so land shouldn’t be
river, as fish cannot swim through the cleared for biofuels and not
dam replanted.
Geothermal
The consumption of energy across the world can be shown in many different graphs: Graph A,
showing the type of energy source used and the amount of energy it contributes, or Graph B, which
shows the amount of energy consumed by each country.
In general, the world is demanding more and more energy. This is because the world’s population
is growing, as is the number of developed countries. As countries develop, they demand more
electricity for household appliances and evolving industries.
- Russia - due to its large natural gas and - Western Europe - The UK has largely
oil fields, as well as many nuclear used up its supply of coal during the
plants. mining era.
- Middle East - Saudia Arabia, Iran, Iraq - Asia - Rapidly growing population
& Kuwait have between them 100 billion means rapid demand outweighs the
barrels of oil to be extracted, making supply of energy.
them wealthy and energy secure.
Controversial Nuclear
Nuclear energy has many benefits:
Reliable source of constant energy since nuclear fission is a constant process and so
the same amount of energy can be produced each day.
The fuel (Uranium) is extremely concentrated, so there are small mining sites
required o
t fuel the nuclear plant.
The nuclear industry creates many employment opportunities at each plant. 475,000
jobs
are created in the US’s nuclear sector, from head engineers to cleaners.
However, not all countries believe nuclear energy is a good idea as the biggest negative is the
possibility of a nuclear meltdown, the effects of which are incredibly long lasting. The land around
Chernobyl (a nuclear power station in Ukraine) is still full of radiation and the effects are still being
felt to this day. Due to this, some governments have adopted anti-nuclear policies. Countries such
as Germany and Denmark don’t use nuclear power stations to generate energy. This is because
these populations share anti-nuclear views and are scared of the radiation risk. In recent years,
fewer countries wish to build nuclear power plants after the 2011 Fukushima Disaster.
● To make room for a power station, dam or mine, builders may clear the land. This means all
vegetation is destroyed and trees are cut down, through deforestation. This means many
wildlife must migrate to live elsewhere. In addition, land is cleared to grow more renewable
biofuels. However, it is not environmental to clear habitats and endanger wildlife.
Factors that Affect Energy Supply
There are physical and human factors that can affect the energy supply.
➔ Miners have to drill deeper to find coal and oil that hasn’t been exploited. Drilling deeper
into the ground increases the risk of earthquakes, mines collapsing and high pressure
ruptures in the rock, which could release the oil and let it escape.
➔ Energy sources in hostile environments are to be exploited. For example, there are large
reserves of oil locked in the Middle East. Some of the Middle East is occupied by militant
groups, so workers are at high risk of capture or being hurt during conflict.
➔ There are some fossil fuel stores in fragile environments, such as the Amazon and
Antarctica. Despite being fragile ecosystems with many rare and endangered species,
some governments are looking to exploit the oil found here.
Source: www.shale-safe.com
Advantages Disadvantages
Source: seekingalpha.com
Advantages Disadvantages
Tar Sands
The extraction of petroleum from sands involves
high energies and boiling water, which can leave
ponds of concentrated chemicals. Tar sands have
a large environmental cost, but can be lucrative in
profit and employment opportunities.
Advantages Disadvantages
➔ Will the energy source run out? Is it non-renewable? Have we over-used this source,
meaning we take more than is replaced?
➔ Do we rely on other countries for our energy? What if we have different political beliefs?
Will there be conflict in the future, which could stop any energy trade?
➔ Could we reduce our energy consumption, especially in terms of how much energy is
wasted?
➔ Will our climate change in the future, due to the Greenhouse Effect? Will the renewable
sources we use now be able to be used in the future? For example, will our climate warm up
so fewer vegetation can grow and be used for biofuel?
Energy in the UK
Within the last decade, the UK’s energy consumption has decreased. This is because the UK’s
manufacturing industry has decreased (such as the production of cars, steel and textiles) and our
technology has developed to become more efficient. Therefore the amount of energy our
household appliances waste has decreased.
Fracking
In the UK, fracking is debated and a controversial issue. The UK has a supply of natural gas
trapped in shale rocks (a sedimentary rock made from fine sands, silts and mud). To release this
trapped natural gas, the process of fracking is used:
Source: No Majesty
Fracking involves pushing high-pressure liquids underground, which causes the shale rocks to
crack and the natural gas to escape. There are many protests against fracking, because
Fracking is an energy-intensive process, since pressurising the liquids requires a lot of
energy. Therefore fracking is expensive and the price of natural gas may increase to make
up for the expenses.
There is a risk of earthquakes due to fracking, as the shale rocks crack underground. If
these earthquakes are strong enough, structural damage to buildings on the surface could
occur. However, up till now, the UK has only experienced up to 2.0 magnitude earthquakes
due to fracking (not high enough to cause damage).
There is also a risk that the pressurised liquids infiltrate and pollute underground water
sources. The liquids forced underground can be mixed with chemicals and salt, to increase
the probability that the shale rock cracks.