Chapter 4 Employee Development and Coaching
Chapter 4 Employee Development and Coaching
Employee Development
While development was once largely considered the domain of HR, it’s
actually every manager’s responsibility to attend to their people’s growth on an on-
going basis. Managers who take employee development seriously are more likely to
lead a team with good morale and high standards, maintain a spirit of continuous
improvement, and achieve better results.
Yet many managers are hesitant to develop their employees. Some argue that they
don’t have the time, especially if there are no challenging or interesting
opportunities currently available for a direct report. Others find the conversations
difficult if their employee isn’t ready for promotion or if the manager doesn’t have a
clear plan of action in mind.
Just because someone has strong skills and impressive performance doesn’t mean
they’re happy in their job. In fact, psychologists Timothy Butler and James Waldroop
write in their HBR article “Job Sculpting: The Art of Retaining Your Best People,”
“managers botch career development – and retention – because they mistakenly
assume people are satisfied with jobs they excel at.”
Don’t allow good people to get stuck in career plateaus. As a manager, you have a
responsibility to make sure that the people you value are progressively advancing
in their career paths.
How can you tell when someone is ready for a new challenge? They usually make it
clear by asking or by pursuing development opportunities. But you can also watch
for a few signs:
Everything they manage has been running smoothly – for a significant period of
time.
When faced with problems, they jump quickly to solutions.
They spend time trying to fix other people’s and other department’s problems.
While they’re still performing well, they’ve been increasingly but inexplicably
negative.
To retain your best performers and maintain their engagement, make an effort to
offer meaningful development opportunities and challenges – and to raise the topic
if they don’t bring it up themselves.
On the other hand, people who are challenges and engaged describe their
development process as exhilarating. When people are energized by learning, it’s
easy for them to stay engaged and perform at their peak. Satisfaction levels rise
alongside challenge.
To be sure investing in your direct reports’ development takes time and thoughtful
effort devoted to discussing and thinking about each of your employees and their
futures. To best help your people develop, you’ll need curiosity about each
individual and patience for the learning process. But your employee will have to do
the hard work of development – starting with taking ownership and embracing
accountability for their own growth. You can’t just hand your direct report a
development plan and expect them to commit and run with it. Each employee’s
drive to grow needs to come from within. “Highly structured, one -size – fits – all
learning programs don’t work anymore,” explains consultant and author Keith
Ferrazzi. “Individuals must own, self-direct, and control their learning futures. Yet
they can’t do it alone, nor do you want them to.”
Responsibility
1. Superior facilitated (by HR)
HR Timelines
End February
A good PDP should have operational and tactical focus and compliance.
The direct supervisor plays a pivotal role in both the design and implementation of a
developmental plan:
Self appraisal gives a chance to the employee to look at his/her strengths and
weaknesses, his achievements, and judge his own performance.
Also known as internal customers, the correct feedback given by peers can help
to find employees’ abilities to work in a team, cooperation and sensitivity towards
others.
Many American companies are now using this 360-degree feedback. Companies
that practice 360-degree appraisals include Motorola, Semco Brazil, British
Petroleum, British Airways, Central Televisions, and so on. Barring a few
multinational companies, in India this system of appraisal is uncommon.
For Employees
1. Can uncover hidden lights and blind spots.
2. Feedback coming from a number of different people is more likely to be
accepted.
3. Helps individuals gain a realistic view of how others perceive them.
4. Inspires people to take ownership of their own learning and development.
5. Provides feedback in a quantifiable form on a structured range of behaviors.
For the Team
1. It helps people understand how their behavior influences both their own
personal effectiveness and how they impact the smooth running of the
organization.
2. Supports teamwork by involving team members in the development process.
3. Increases communication between team members.
4. Higher levels of trust and better communication as individuals identify the
causes of breakdowns.
5. Increased team effectiveness.
1. Anonymity
2. Confidentiality
The overall feedback should be handled confidentially, ensuring that the data is
shared only with the individual concerned and possibly with a designated coach or
HR professional who can facilitate development discussions.
4. Comprehensive
5. Relevant
The competencies and behaviors included in the feedback should be relevant to the
individual's role, responsibilities, and the organization's goals. Irrelevant feedback
can be confusing and demotivating.
6. Specific
8. Supported by Training
Both feedback providers and recipients should receive training on how to give and
receive feedback effectively. This training can help in ensuring that the feedback is
constructive and that recipients can use the feedback productively.
Coaching
Effective coaching depends not only on the skills of the coach and the receptiveness
of the person being coached, but also on the conditions outlined above being
present (clarity about success criteria, usable feedback, etc.) in the work setting, at
the same time, when managers start to coach, if they are working effectively there
is a better chance of the surrounding conditions being improved. Coaching
conversations may lead to increased clarity about job expectations, for instance,
and may provide regular feedback and the opportunity to think through standards
and criteria for success. There is a close two-way relationship between effective
coaching initiatives and a favorable learning climate, each enhancing the other.
The concept of coaching remains most easily associated with sports coaching where
the purpose of the coach is to help the person they are coaching to reach their
personal best. Interestingly, the nature of sports coaching is undergoing basic
changes-ones which are, to some degree, mirrored in organizations. There was a
time when the coach was the person who drove the athlete on, forced the pace and
continually instructed. Increasingly coaches are now moving to an approach which
involves accurately targeted questioning to help the athlete become increasingly
aware of ‘what works’- for instance, the environment in which he or she performs
best, how this feels, and what the obstacles are to achieving this repeatedly.
Despite this changing emphasis, some traditional aspects of coaching remain-for
example, the coach also celebrates victories and supports the athletes through bad
times.
In the same way, the manager who is coaching subordinates finds a way of getting
them to reflect on their performance, become aware of what they are doing and
how they are doing it, so that each individual in the end learns to monitor his or her
own performance. At the same time, the manager provides essential information
and knowledge where there are gaps that need to be filled. While doing this, they
are working to develop a climate where learning and innovation– as well as
achievement–are expected and rewarded. The coaching approach challenges the
manager to think about the nature of the roles of the people they may be coaching,
and this is a developmental experience for the managers. Many HR functions are
devolving some other their management development responsibilities to the line,
and the concept of ‘manager as coach’ is seen as part of this trend.
There are many possible approaches to coaching. They may involve watching what
a person does and giving feedback on what you notice; working on problems with
someone and learning together; asking stimulating open-ended questions; taking
through your own thinking processes aloud, and encouraging the other person to do
the same encouraging analysis of what really works for individuals; finding your own
way of seeing the work and the learning from the other person’s point of view; and
using questioning as a way of helping a person understand their own thought
processes.
1. The organizational setting or culture – ‘what works around here?’, where does
this project fit into the overall strategic plan?
2. Identifying problems and possible causes – ‘what exactly is going wrong?’,
‘has this happened before?’
3. Establishing overall desired outcomes – ‘what are you trying to achieve?’,
‘what is the general purpose here?’
1. What the person is doing-‘what exactly did you do?’, ‘how are you going
about this?’
2. Comparisons-‘is this different from what you did last time?’, are other people
doing the same thing?’, ‘can you learn from them?’
3. Questions about thinking-‘how are you thinking this through?’, ‘what
evidence are you looking for?’, ‘what assumptions are you making?’, ‘do they
need checking?’
4. Questions about resources-‘what it help to organize your resources
differently?’
These pitfalls can be avoided by keeping in mind the purpose and desired outcome
of the coaching activity.
The coaching approach in this situation is to deal with these by focusing on clear
expectations. Often these expectations have not been properly mapped out or
clearly understood.
Gathering information and agreeing where the problem lies are essential next steps,
at the same time as staying aware of the other person’s reactions.
In dealing with underperformance, the following pattern, for a coach, can be useful:
1. Get clear in your own mind what the situation is: what is the current
performance, and what it is expected to be;
2. Lay aside feelings of blame and irritation and gather information about how
individuals are reacting, their awareness of the performance shortfall, and
what they see as the problems.
3. Get the person being coached to share in identifying the problems, adding
their own perspective and ask them for possibilities to resolve them. This is a
stage where it is particularly important to maintain a positive and clear
relationship, focusing forward on next steps and change.
4. Establish a process whereby the employee will set up a plan for informing the
coach/ manager of progress against clearly stated goals.
Learning to Coach
Resistance may be overcome by starting the coaching from the top. The managers
who are expected to move to a coaching style may themselves need to be coached.
This experience helps them to understand the value of coaching at first hand, and
to get an intuitive sense of how to do it themselves.
Directive vs. Supportive: Some managers have a more directive style, focusing
on giving specific instructions and closely monitoring progress. Others may
adopt a more supportive role, emphasizing guidance and encouraging self-
discovery among their team members.
Analytical vs. Intuitive: Managers with an analytical approach might rely on
data and structured methods in their coaching, while those with an intuitive
style may place more value on instinct and personal experience.
Task-oriented vs. Relationship-oriented: Task-oriented managers prioritize
achieving specific outcomes and may focus their coaching on improving
performance metrics. In contrast, relationship-oriented managers might
concentrate on building strong, trusting relationships, believing that this
foundation leads to better performance.
Risk-averse vs. Risk-tolerant: A manager's tolerance for risk can affect their
coaching by either encouraging innovation and experimentation or preferring
more conservative, proven methods.
Understanding and adapting one’s coaching style to better fit the needs of their
employees can lead to more effective development and performance improvement.
The coaching process is dynamic and personalized, requiring the coach to adapt
their approach based on the evolving needs of the employee and the context in
which they operate. Effective coaching fosters a culture of continuous learning and
development, ultimately leading to enhanced individual performance and
organizational success.