The Way of Tea - A Symbolic Analysis
The Way of Tea - A Symbolic Analysis
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland is collaborating with JSTOR to
digitize, preserve and extend access to Man
DORINNE KONDO
Harvard University
The Japanese tea ceremony can be understood as a precisely structured sequence in which
formal features are constitutive of meaning. Though culturally constructed meaning must inform
any understanding of the rite, this alone cannot account for the tea ceremony's symbolic power.
This internal reading focuses on key formal features: sequencing; the role of multiple media; and
patterning or redundancy. Analysis reveals that sequencing is symbolised through: i) a constant
contrast between the ritual and the mundane; 2) the use of boundaries to mark these differences; 3)
the sensible qualities of objects and substances used in the ceremony, and their transposition into
various sensory media; 4) the occurrence of homologous structures and sequences. The inter-
action of the sensory media effects a homology of code, constituting one source of redundancy.
Together with the repetition of sequences, this redundancy intensifies meaning and acts as
contrastive background for minute but significant changes that may occur. Through its orches-
tration of sequence and pattern, the tea ceremony articulates feeling and thought and creates a
distilled form of experience.
The tea ceremony presents a unique challenge to the anthropologist, for the
essence of tea and of Zen is said to elude logical, discursive analysis. Zen favours
experience and intuition over intellection, and although the tea ceremony has
given rise to a long tradition of scholarly exegesis, the Zen arts1 continue to
emphasise the primacy of transcendence through a-logical, non-verbal means.2
This dialectic of experience and native exegesis is at one level unassailable and
must play a key role in any attempt to understand the meaning and symbolism
of the ceremony.
Yet, culturally constructed mcaning cannot exhaustively account for the tea
ceremony's symbolic power. While remaining mindful of the Zen masters'
warnings, we will nonetheless attempt to analyse the tea ceremony as a
structured sequence directed toward a 'telic or performative outcome' (Tambiah
I973: I99). I assume that ritual is, among other things, a communicative and a
performative act. This focus on the 'inner frame' (a) complements studies of the
way of tea and of Zen aesthetics, which deal exclusively with culturally
constructed meaning (e.g., Ludwig I974; Sen I979; Okakura I964) and (b)
explores the application of linguistic/semiotic models to the analysis of se-
quence, the use of multiple media, and the role of patterning or redundancy in
ritual.3 Careful attention to the formal features of the tea ceremony will enable
us to delineate the movement of this complexly structured symbolic process,
aimed towards a change of state in the actor's thought and feeling.
I
Tea ceremonies may be held on a variety of occasions, depending on the season,
the time of day, the school of tea, etc. The principal schools are Omote and Ura
Senke, with Sekishui and Enshui as major variants; the differences among them
are generally minor, such as details of folding a tea napkin.4
One can participate in ceremonies in a number of ways. The first is tea as
okeiko, taking lessons. So natural and effortless when performed, the rite is in
fact minutely prescribed, from the smallest details of movement to the creation
of larger sequences. The tea student begins with basics such as how to walk and
how to wipe a tea bowl, and progresses to simple forms such as the informal bon
demae (tea ceremony where a tray is used) and the various forms of usucha, the
thin tea ceremony. Acquisition of skills is marked by certificates attesting to the
level of expertise attained in the ceremony. The more variants one masters, the
higher one's rank.5
Chakai, tea gatherings, are another context in which ceremonies are per-
formed. A tea organisation may rent out the grounds of a temple or a restaurant
and hold a day of ceremonies. A schedule is published, with several different
ceremonies taking place simultaneously. Participants-usually members of the
organisation-may attend the rites of their choice. The hosts are all selected in
advance, sometimes performing publicly in order to demonstrate the attain-
ment of a high rank. A recital or a concert would be a close analogue. I have also
participated in tea ceremonies held as part of some festival or celebration. For
example, during a 'Cultural Festival', my teacher's students were asked to
prepare and serve tea for any passersby who might want to act as guests. First
and foremost, however, the tea ceremony is a highly ritualised version of the
host/guest interaction, and a heightened expression of the emphasis on etiquette
inJapanese culture in general.6 It embodies the appreciation of formalised social
interaction the importance, for example, of learning tatemae, the graces neces-
sary to maintain harmonious social interaction.7 The theory is that mere good
intentions are insufficient; one must know the proper form in order to express
one's feelings of hospitality effectively.
The following description is of such a host-guest interaction, focusing on a
single variant of the many types of tea ceremony. The account is based primarily
on written sources-manuals of tea, if you will-and to a lesser extent on
informants' statements and my own experience as a student of tea. It is the
full-length, formal, midday rite (shogo chaji) lasting from three to five hours.
Because of its length, the years of expertise required to host such a gathering,
and the expense and preparation involved, it is not the most commonly
practised variant-forms of the usucha, or thin tea, ceremony are-but I have
selected this chaji for analysis because it is considered the 'standard chaji by which
all others are created' (Palmer I976: 7I). Moreover, training in tea is designed to
make the student capable of hosting such a ceremony.
Focusing on a single 'ideal typical' ceremony seemed desirable for two
reasons. First, since my concern is to explore the implications of an internal,
semantic analysis, this 'standard chaji' as described in tea manuals and as taught
to pupils, casts into relief the structure, form and sequence of the rite, providing
II
Zenrei Guests are generally invited to the ceremony a week in advance, and
ideally the principal guest pays a call on the host (zenrei) to accept the invitation
(Sen I979: 62).
Arrival In classic tea gardens, the guests arrive at the gate, where the paving
stones have been sprinkled with water, a signal for them to enter. They proceed
to a room called the yoritsuki, in the outer garden, where they change clothes and
put on clean split-toed socks. From there they advance to the waiting room or
machiai, and await the rest of their number. Ifit has not already been determined,
they select a principal guest (shokyaku) who is first in order, and a final guest
(tsume) who brings up the rear. In each instance a special knowledge of the
ceremony is desirable. If there is an assistant to the host, the guests may be
served osayu, hot water to which a delicate flavouring may be added (Ishikawa
1976: 67). The guests view the scroll, flowers and implements displayed in the
machiai, waiting area, and then proceed to the koshikake machiai, or waiting
arbour. The host returns to the tea room, leaving the gate to the inner garden
slightly ajar, and the guests follow in single file, setting out on the garden path of
stones. This is glossed explicitly in some works as the path into enlightenment. 9
When the last guest reaches the inner roji, s/he shuts the middle gate. In the inner
garden, the guests advance to the stone basin, or tsukubai, to purify their mouths
and hands with water.
Seki-iri The next phase of the ceremony is called seki-iri, literally, entering into
one's seat. Leaving the sandals propped against the wall of the tea room, the
principal guest crawls through the nijiri-guchi (literally, the crawling-in en-
trance) with a crouch and slide motion. The extremely small size of the entrance
is said to inculcate humility.
The principal guest then proceeds to the tokonoma, or alcove, kneeling before
it to view the scroll hung there. This work of art and the tea flowers that appear
there later, set the mood for the occasion. The principal guest then proceeds to
his/her seat, as each guest examines the scroll. The last guest shuts the door of
the nijiri-guchi with a click, a signal for the host to appear.
Shozumi (Arranging of Charcoal)"0 The host, waits in the mizuya (small prep-
aration area adjacent to the tea room) until the guests are in place and then
appears at the host entrance to exchange formal greetings with the guests. The
host then returns to the mizuya and brings out charcoal, tongs, and incense
burner, and begins to smooth the ashes in the brazier into a pattern. After the fire
is started, the contents of the incense burner are emptied into the brazier. The
guests admire the fire, then the principal guest asks to see the incense holder,
which they all examine in sequence as the host retires to the service area. S/he
returns to retrieve the incense holder and to announce that 'a frugal meal' will be
served. "
Kaiseki is food for the tea ceremony. 12 Each guest is given a small individual tray
with a bowl of rice, one of soup, and perhaps a dish of vegetables and/or fish,
though other foods may be offered in addition. Sake is also served. Kaiseki
should be fresh, natural, and appropriate to the season, and portions should be
small. The host does not partake, but may stay to serve the guests sake. S/He
retires again to the mizuya until they finish eating. The guests eat, wipe their
bowls and chopsticks with small squares of paper they have brought along, and
when finished, sharply click their chopsticks on the tray, a signal for the host to
remove their utensils. Omogashi, moist sweets, are then carried out in lacquer
boxes, one sweet per box, and after the guests partake they retire to the waiting
arbour.
Koicha The next segment is the real height of the tea ceremony: the preparation
and drinking of koicha, thick tea. The scroll in the alcove has now been replaced
by a chabana (tea flower) arrangement. The guests admire the arrangement, take
their proper places, principal guest in the seat of honour near the alcove, 13 and sit
quietly as the host brings in separately: i) water jar (mizusashi); 2) tea bowl, tea
scoop, tea caddy; 3) receptacle for waste water (kensui), lid stand, and bamboo
dipper. The host purifies the caddy and scoop by wiping them with the tea
napkin, rinses and wipes the bowl, and prepares tea. These minutely prescribed
acts are performed with a graceful economy of motion. The guests watch in
complete silence. This is considered the climax of the ceremony.
The guests then partake of the thick tea, drinking in sequence from a single
bowl, the principal guest first, the tsume, or final guest, draining the bowl,
wiping it, and returning it to the host. The haiken or examination follows, a
question-answer session between the principal guest and the host, centring on
the names and historical associations of the various tea implements. With the
completion of the haiken and the removal of the utensils, the koicha segment
concludes.
Gozumi At this point there may be a rebuilding of the charcoal fire, a process
called gozumi, paralleling the first lighting of the fire, shozumi. Replacing the
incense is a small tray or tabako-bon, bearing a piece of charcoal in a cup, and a
bamboo 'ashtray', as well as a pipe and a tiny amount of tobacco. 14
Usucha The usucha segment follows. The sequence of actions parallels that in the
koicha ceremony, with the following key differences: a) Usucha itself is a less
concentrated form of the same tea; it is thinner and lighter and can be whipped
into a froth, while koicha must be kneaded and then stirred. b) The specific tea
utensils for usucha are defined as more informal, though not necessarily less
replete with historical associations. c) Higashi-light, dry sweets eaten with the
fingers-are served, and one eats them while one's tea is being made. This
contrasts with the formal presentation of omogashi in lacquer boxes. Omogashi
are eaten with a special pick before partaking of koicha. d) More conversation is
allowed during usucha. e) Instead of sharing a single bowl of tea, each guest
drains the bowl and then examines it. If desired, the guest may request
additional servings of tea. In brief, usucha is more informal, lighter and freer in
tone.
When all guests have partaken, the principal guest asks the host to end the
ceremony. At this point the guests examine the tea container and the tea scoop,
as the host removes the other utensils in the reverse order from which they were
initially carried into the room. The examination completed, the host returns to
answer questions about the utensils. The ceremony closes with formal greetings
(aisatsu), with both sides expressing their appreciation. The guests leave the
room, principal guest last, and close the door of the niiri-guchi. They then turn
to face the tea house, as the host opens the nijiri-guchi and silent bows are
exchanged. This is the okurirei, or farewell. The host remains waiting until the
guests are no longer in sight, and then closes the door. On the following day the
chief guest should call informally upon the host to express the group's appreci-
ation (Palmer I976: 77).
III
The aesthetic sensibility informing the way of tea traces its roots through Zen
Buddhism, to Chinese Ch'an Buddhism and Taoism. Tea ceremony, like other
Zen arts, is a religious/aesthetic/philosophical 'way' (injapanese, michi or do; in
Chinese, tao). This di, an elusive concept to define, could be glossed as 'the inner
essence of reality' (Bellah I957: 6i). Accordingly, the 'way' of tea, like the other
Zen master arts, is more than mere artistic or technical proficiency: it is a path to
Enlightenment.
According to Zen doctrine, Enlightenment is mu-emptiness or nothingness.
Zen ideals include qualities such as mushin, selflessness or detachment, and
ritual and how these in turn act persuasively to generate a feeling of exceptional
experience.
IV
Like narrative, ritual is an unfolding, a sequence of movement with tensions,
climaxes and directionality. The ritual process must create a ritual domain, '. . .
by seducing participants into involvement with its form and . . . [by] propelling
the now-transformed participants out into life' (Peacock I969: I72).
I will argue that in the tea ceremony, the principal symbolic devices account-
ing for the movements of the rite are: i) a constant contrast between the ritual
and the mundane and degrees thereof; 2) the use of boundaries to maintain these
differences; 3) the sensible qualities of objects and substances used in the
ceremony and the transposition of these qualities into various sensory media; 4)
perhaps most important, the repetition of sequences and the occurrence of
homologous structures, objects, actions, as the principal means of signifying the
progression of the ritual.
A logical point of departure for analysis is the physical, spatial arrangement of
the tea garden and hut. The garden is an especially salient feature, for it is the first
apprehensible signal that one is entering the ritual world. Consequently, it must
prepare the participant, beginning to restructure his/her attitude appropriately.
A diagram of the garden follows. It should be noted that, like the many
variants of the tea ceremony itself, tea gardens also differ from one another. The
choice of a particular arrangement ultimately lies with the host.20 However,
though certain details may vary, the basic structure of the inner and outer roji
does not change; moreover, the impression imparted by each section of the
garden must differ, with the outer garden more normal and ordinary, the inner
more set apart from the everyday world.
First, the garden itself is demarcated from the outside world by the gate.
Upon entering, guests find the garden in turn is divided into the inner and outer
roji, or dewy path. The outer roji comprises two principal structures, the machiai
or waiting room, and the koshikake machiai, the waiting bench or waiting
arbour. The former is enclosed and floored with tatami mats, the latter is roofed
but open. Near the koshikake machiai is the privy or setchin, used primarily for
display; it may be inspected if the guests so desire, as it, too, has been purified
and prepared for the guests' aesthetic enjoyment. The path in the outer garden is
direct, generally a paved stone walkway, and is thus primarily functional or
utilitarian. The only real criterion for the outer roji is that it be scrupulously
clean. The garden is pleasant, with a free, light atmosphere, and flowering trees
may be allowed there (Allan Palmer, personal communication). The outer roji is
a preliminary step into ritual time.
As one moves into the inner garden, the atmosphere shifts to one of serene
tranquillity and harmony with nature. Everything in the inner garden reflects an
induction into the ritual domain. Guests may no longer speak loudly, nor may
they touch upon frivolous topics of conversation, for presumably they have left
their earthly concerns behind. The path is irregular and divided, to provoke
aesthetic interest and leisurely contemplation. Ferns, small plants and trees, and,
K
INNER ROJI
F E OUTER ROJI
0S~~
A Gate
B Entry
C Yoritsuki
E Setchin (privy) D
G Middle gate
H Stone lantern B
I Crouching basin
Mundane Ritual
Thus, movement from the outside world into the tea garden is a step into the
ritual world; movement from one part of the garden to the other is a further
progression into the domain of ritual time and space. This both strips the guests
of their worldliness and envelops them in a ritual atmosphere of sabi/wabi.
The meaning of any single element is opaque when viewed in isolation, but
acquires significance when contrasted to its analogues in other parts of the
ceremony and to the mundane world outside. Relative formality/informality is
symbolised through the exploitation of differences and similarities among
features. The tea garden stands in contrast to the world outside; in the garden
itself, the outer garden was this-worldy and informal, the inner formal. The
same principles apply not only to the induction of the participant into ritual time
but in the easing of symbolic intensity and the return into the mundane world.
One example would be the building of the first fire (shozumi) and the building of
the second fire (gozumi). Shozumi is a prelude to the koicha segment, the formal
climax of the ceremony; thus there is a logical imperative to render this part of
the ceremony relatively formal. The mood is set with the slow patterning of the
ashes in the brazier and the burning of incense to fill the air with the fragrance of
spirituality. During the second building of the fire, no such careful patterning is
necessary; indeed the segment can be omitted altogether. The host may bring
out cushions to make the guests more comfortable and carries out the smoking
tray. One recalls that this was last seen in the machiai. Thus, though the guests
are forbidden to smoke in the tea room, the smoking tray signifies informality; it
represents the act of smoking, an informal activity, and it is metonymically
associated with the structures of the outer garden and the outer world. This
recapitulation of elements creates formality and a spiritual, contemplative mood
in shozumi, and an informal atmosphere in the gozumi, a quick descent from the
intensely formal symbolism of koicha. Accordingly, in juxtaposing the two
separated sequences of shozumi and gozumi, the significance of each, their
relative formality or informality, is clarified. Moreover, examining the rela-
tionship of segments occurring in sequence also enables us to illuminate their
respective meanings. The positioning ofgozumi after the solemn koicha segment
highlights the worldliness of the former and the formal mood of the latter. In
short, the entire ritual moves along the axis of relative this-worldliness or
other-worldliness, and systematically uses the devices of metaphor, metonym
and contrast to communicate those differences.
V
Now that certain basic symbolic mechanisms informing the tea ceremony have
been identified, what of the movement of the sequence as a whole? The
progression is encoded in a seemingly chaotic concatenation of modes. Rather
than focusing on all of them simultaneously, we will trace one thread through-
out the entire sequence: the auditory channel and the role of silence, signals, and
verbal v. non-verbal symbolism in conveying an impression of increasing and
then decreasing symbolic intensity. The auditory mode is one that immediately
presents itself for analysis, for two reasons. First, the pre-eminence of non-
VI
In examining the role of substances in the ceremony, three features are high-
lighted: i) setting apart the ritual from the mundane; 2) the similarities and
differences in consecutively occurring sequences; 3) creating significant con-
trasts between similar but discontinuous parts of the ritual (first and second fires,
osayu-kaiseki-koicha-usucha). This is a movement from the metaphorically
mundane to the metaphorically ritual and back again.
First, many of the substances used are particular to the ceremony itself and are
only infrequently found in other contexts. For example, among the foods,
kaiseki is by definition a tea ceremony meal. This type of refined cuisine can also
be found in restaurants that specialise in such elegant delicacies, but its primary
association is with the way of tea. Ceremonial sweets form another specialised
category. Both omogashi and higashi are ritual terms, and both are beautiful
aesthetic creations, smaller and more elegant than the usual everyday confec-
tions. One could conceivably use regular sweets in the place of proper omogashi
or higashi (when I was a student of tea, we did this to economise, as tea ceremony
sweets, being specialities, are expensive); equally, one could buy tea ceremony
sweets to eat at home. Yet the chief function of omogashi and higashi is
ceremonial.
Similar arguments could be advanced for the non-food substances. The tea
itself is associated chiefly with the ceremony, symbolised in the special ritual
terms koicha and usucha. Both are forms of matcha, powdered green tea. Usucha,
thin tea, might be served to guests informally, but to my knowledge, koicha-a
thick, concentrated form of matcha-is rarely, perhaps never, encountered
outside the context of the ceremony. Of the other non-food substances, both are
in some way special. Osayu, hot water, is not commonly consumed in everyday
life. Sake is one of the typical Shinto offerings to the gods and is found in many
Shinto rituals; thus it has sacral connotations. Accordingly, both food and
non-food substances create a symbolic cleavage between the ritual and the
mundane.
Substances also symbolise the movement of the ceremony. On entering the
tea room, for example, the sequence begins with fire, air and incense (rendered
special by the connotations of incense as a substance) and moves toward
increasing intensity with the eating of the fresh foods, drinking of the strong,
alcoholic sake, eating the moist sweets, and performing another ablution with
cool, fresh water. 28 The entire first half of the rite is a slow, elaborate preparation
for the climax of koicha; it is thought that to drink this thick tea without proper
fortification might be dangerous. After the climax, the ceremony moves again
to the element of fire and of tobacco smoke, not incense, signalling a much more
informal mood, and then to the eating of dry sweets (informal because they can
be picked up and eaten with the hands) and the drinking of weak or thin tea.
Several points are important to note: i) Purification with cold water always
precedes entry into the tea room, and in each case presages a significant
heightening of the ritual atmosphere. 2) The core of the ceremony could be said
to correspond to metaphorical spirituality, and the cultural significance of the
substances used: sake, moist sweets made especially for the tea ceremony, the
purificatory cold water ablution, and then the thick tea. All these occur in
sequence, together, and thus form a 'bundle of relations' with considerable
symbolic impact. 3) The pre-eminence of koicha can be explained in terms of the
metaphorical qualities of the substance itself. 29 Tea symbolises the introspective
qualities associated with Zen: an awakening of the senses and a contemplative
atmosphere (Watts I957: I90; Suzuki I970: 298).
Though not perfectly symmetrical, it is as though the ritual begins from the
core and works outward, so that the sequences on either side of the climactic
episodes recapitulate one another. There is a reversal from one half to the other,
as the sequence itself builds to a high point, bringing together elements in a
certain order. In the process of re-entry into the mundane, the opposite sequence
is followed. Not only is this demonstrated at the general level of major
sequences, it occurs within each segment; e. g., when the host takes utensils out
of the room in the reverse order from which they were first brought in.
The ritual also makes full use of similar segments occurring in discontinuous
parts of the sequence. Take, for example, the partaking of food and drink during
the ceremony. Here, the similarities provide a contrastive ground for the salient
differences among these segments. The relative formality of these sequences
(osayu, kaiseki and sake, omogashi and koicha, higashi and usucha) is highlighted in
juxtaposition, symbolising the progressive induction and release of the partici-
pant. In osayu, no foods are served, and the drink itself is nothing but hot water,
though some delicate flavouring agent can be added. This, then, is a 'weak'30
drink-different from everyday Japanese beverages and hence signalling an
entry into ritual time, but not concentrated, hence not symbolically powerful.
Sake, which follows, is powerful and strong, and thus symbolically more
intense than osayu. It holds dual associations, with social, hence more mun-
dane, activity on the one hand, and as a common feature in the Shinto (not Zen)
religion.31 Koicha singifies its strength even in its heavy texture. It is a thick
distillate of a natural product, powdered tea leaves, and thus is imbued with
these qualities in highly concentrated form. It is a substance peculiar to the
ceremony itself. Usucha partakes of these same qualities, but in less intense
fashion. It is slightly less special, as it is a less concentrated form of the same tea.
And, though it is not the most common beverage served to guests, one could do
so-or prepare a bowl for one's own consumption; thus, it is less purely
ceremonial in its connotations. Again, the basic movements of the rite, from the
more ordinary to the more extraordinary and back again, are encoded even in
the sensible properties of the substances used in the various segments of the
ritual. Schematically represented, the ritual is divisible as follows:
VII
Redundancy of message among the sensory modes and the repetition of
sequences is a key rhetorical/symbolic device in the ceremony. Let us begin with
the interaction of the graphic, gestural, gustatory, tactile and verbal sensory
channels and the process of objectification, or the transposition of intangible
qualities into various sensory modes.
The performative creation of the ritual domain begins in the yoritsuki where
the guests put on fresh tabi, brush the dust off their clothes and change their
attire. Here, in leaving behind their everyday clothing, they physically divest
themselves of reminders of the everyday world. This progressive shedding of
worldly concerns continues during their procession in the garden and is
powerfully symbolised in the passing of the chiriana (dust hole) near the tea
room. Here is one's final opportunity to brush away the pollutions and
contingencies of everyday life before entering the tea room. One last reminder
of this entry into a ritual domain is the act of removing one's sandals and
standing them up outside the hut.33 This transmutation of qualities-in this
case, pollution or this-worldliness-into physical objects and tangible proper-
ties, is one of the most compelling of performative acts. It gives ritual a
literalness that verbal communication rarely achieves. After ridding themselves
of meaning in and of itself, and it is a vehicle of meaning for the minute but
significant changes that may occur in the repetition of a sequence.
VIII
Finally, this allows something more general to be said about the nature of ritual
itself. Should ritual be a mere communicative device designed to impart a
simple, discursive message, there would be little apparent rationale for the
existence of the ritual form. Ritual 'messages' can be repetitive, prodigally so,
freely drawing upon all the sensory modes and all manner of symbolic devices.
Folk belief may also encourage a view of ritual as rigid, convention-bound and
inimical to real, spontaneous feeling. Why, say these pragmatists, make such a
fuss over drinking a cup of tea?
Perhaps the answer to these riddles lies with the Zen masters. For at least in the
tea ceremony, and perhaps in other rituals as well, it is by becoming one with the
rules that the possibility of transcendence lies.37 The formality of ritual also
enables the participant to forget the contingencies of everyday life and frees the
mind for 'greater' thoughts.38 Ritual, then, need not be an ossified form
interfering with 'true' feeling and spontaneity. In fact, form separates the ritual
from the everyday and distinguishes the casual partaking of a cup of tea from
chanoyu, the way of tea. By its precise orchestration of sequence and the
interrelations among symbols in different sensory modes, the tea ceremony
articulates feeling and thought, creating a distilled form of experience set apart
from the mundane world.
NOTES
Several people have read this manuscript in draft form. I should particularly like to thank S. J.
Tambiah, John C. Pelzel, Matthews Hamabata and Vincent Crapanzano for their perceptive
comments. Of course, final responsibility lies solely with the author.
1 Among themgado (the way of poetry), kyuido (the way of archery), kendo (the way of the sword)
and Bushido (the way of the warrior).
2 Scholars have long been sensitive to the differences and similarities among various sensory
modes (e.g., Jakobson's visual and auditory signs, Langer's discursive and presentational symbols).
As a method of representation and symbolisation, discursive language, like any mode of com-
munication-the plastic arts, music, gesture and so on-excels at certain tasks and is less suited for
others.
Roland Barthes, the structuralist literary critic, dares to imply that an art closely related to
tea-haiku-is refractory to Western schemes of analysis: 'il nous resiste, perd finalement les adjectifs
qu'un moment plus t6t on lui decernait et entre dans cette suspension du sens, qui nous est la chose la
plus etrange puisqu'elle rend impossible l'exercice le plus courant de notre parole, qui est le
commentaire . . .' (Barthes I970: IIO).
' See Tambiah (I979) for a comprehensive review ofthe treatment ofthese issues in the literature.
4 While in Japan, I studied with a teacher of the Ura Senke school for two years, and after
returning to the United States continued lessons with another Ura Senke teacher for about six
months.
5 This is a practice common in forms of the traditional arts; inju-do, for instance, one rises through
the different kyu, or grades, and receives certificates and other external symbols of rank, such as the
colour of the belt. Like all the arts, however, true mastery is an unattainable goal; merely to approach
it takes a lifetime.
special variety of sake is drunk during the New Year holidays. In this sense, it could be said to be part
of the long, purificatory process which takes place before the partaking of the tea itself. Thus, sake is
both social and 'sacred' or special. The manuals on tea emphasise the social connotations of sake,
saying that it is offered in order to foster a friendly spirit among the participants. Indeed, Edwards
argues for a strong relationship between 'sake and solidarity', which appears in ritual contexts as part
of a symbolic means of creating 'bonds between men [sic.], or between men and gods.
(Edwards I982: 703).
32 Another way of analysing the tea ceremony would be to compare it to other rituals involving
the use of stimulants, from other areas of the world. Though this exceeds the bounds of this
particular article, such a comparison might prove highly illuminating.
3 The opposition between inside and outside is a salient one inJapanese culture. One never wears
outside shoes inside the house; instead these are left at the foyer which is at a lower level than the rest
of the house. Only slippers, tabi, stockings-inside footwear-can be worn within the home. To do
otherwise would be a fundamental breach of etiquette; in fact it would be unthinkable, un-Japanese.
Inside/outside also signifies a 'mode' of behaviour-uchi (cf. Uchi Roji) is the intimate in-group; soto
is the outside, public world (cf. Kondo I982).
3 It is what one offers to the ancestors, and is sometimes thought to have curative powers; it is
also closely associated with Buddhism.
35 Leach (I976) argues that patterning or redundancy helps the receiver understand the message
being communicated.
36 Through capitalising on the qualities of the particular modes involved (e.g., the discursive
nature of language, the simultaneity of visual stimuli, the palpability of objects).
37 This is a profound theme in Japanese culture, underlying pedagogy, definitions of person,
maturity, role fulfilment, etc. See e.g., Kondo I982.
38 Lest the reader fear that I am spinning webs of fantasy, it does seem that this feeling of
tranquillity and of losing oneself in the rules is in fact conveyed to the participants, however
implicitly or imperfectly. One informant told me of her experience. Taking tea solely as a wifely art,
she kept a diary of her feelings about the ceremony. Even at a young age, she felt that, once learned,
the rules allowed her to think of greater things. In daily life minor matters and small decisions absorb
one's conscious attention and energy. Ritual liberates one from the necessity of diverting energy to
these trivialities, to learn the rules so completely that one's actions no longer occupy one's attention.
Thus the powers of thought and feeling can be directed toward that which is truly meaningful.
REFERENCES
Bachnik, Jane I978. Inside and outside theJapanese household. Thesis, Harvard University.
Barthes, Roland I970. L'empire des signes. Geneva: Skira.
I974. S/Z. New York: Hill & Wang.
Bellah, Robert I957. Tokugawa religion. Boston: Beacon Press.
Caudill, William & Helen Weinstein I969. Maternal care and infant behavior inJapan and America.
Psychiatry 32, I2-43.
Davidson, Georgie I970. Classical ikebana. New York: A. S. Barnes.
Edwards, Walter I982. Something borrowed: wedding cakes as symbols in modern Japan. Am.
Ethnol. 9, 699-7II.
Fernandez, James W. I977. The performance of ritual metaphors. In The social use of metaphor (eds)
D. Sapir & C. Crocker. Philadelphia: Univ. of Pennsylvania Press.
Hasumi, Toshimitsu I962. Zen inJapanese art. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Herrigel, Eugen I953. Zen in the art of archery. New York: Pantheon.
Ishikawa, Sojin I976. An invitation to tea. Chanoyu Q. i6, 65-70.
Jakobson, Roman I960. Linguistics and poetics. In Style in language (ed.) T. Sebeok. Cambridge,
Mass.: M. I. T. Press.
Kondo, Dorinne I982. Work, family and the self: a cultural analysis ofJapanese family enterprise.
Thesis, Harvard University.
Kuck, Lorraine I940. The art ofJapanese gardens. New York: John Day.
Langer, Suzanne K. I942. Philosophy in a new key. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
Leach, Edmund I976. Culture and communication. Cambridge: Univ. Press.
Lebra, Takie Sugiyama I 976. Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: Univ. Press of Hawaii.
Levi-Strauss, Claude I969. The raw and the cooked. New York: Harper & Row.
Ludwig, Theodore M. I974. The way of tea: a religio-aesthetic mode of life. Hist. Relig. 14, 28-5o.
Maki, Fumihiko I979. Japanese city spaces and the concept of oku. Japan Architect 264, So-62.
Needham, Rodney I967. Percussion and transition. Man (N.S.) 2, 606-I4.
Okakura, Kakuzo I964. The book of tea. New York: Dover.
Palmer, Allan I976. Temae: chaji: conclusion and variation. Chanoyu Q. I6,
Peacock, James L. I969. Society as narrative. In American Ethnological Society Proceedings. Seattle:
Univ. of Washington Press.
Sen, Soshitsu I979. Chado: theJapanese way of tea. Tokyo: Weatherhill.
Tambiah, StanleyJ. I973. The form and meaning of magical acts. In Modes ofthought (eds) R. Horton
& R. Finnegan. London: Faber & Faber.
I979. A performative approach to ritual. In Proceedings of the British Academy 65. London:
Oxford Univ. Press.
Tsunoda, Ryusaku, W. T. DeBary & Donald Keene (eds) i958. Sources ofJapanese tradition. New
York: Columbia Univ. Press.
Vogt, Evon Z. I977. On the symbolic meaning of percussion in Zinacanteco ritual. J. anthrop. Res.
33, 23 I-44.
Watys, Ala I957. The way of Zen. New York: Vintage.