Unit Ii Quantum Mechanics: Limitations of Classical Mechanics
Unit Ii Quantum Mechanics: Limitations of Classical Mechanics
QUANTUM MECHANICS
INTRODUCTION
The most outstanding development in modern science is the conception of quantum
mechanics. The quantum mechanics is better than Newtonian classical mechanics in
explaining the fundamental physics. There was big development in physics between the
time of Newton and the time of quantum mechanics.
Newton showed that the motion of planets and the free fall of an object on earth is
governed by the same law. Thus, he unified terrestrial and celestial mechanics. This was
in contrast to ancient belief that the world of the earth and heaven is governed by
different laws.
It was earlier believed that the heat is some peculiar substance called 'caloric', which
flows from a hot object to a cold object. But latter it was proved that the heat is the
random motion or vibration of constituents of matter. Thus, thermodynamics and
mechanics were unified.
For a long time, the phenomena of electricity, magnetism and light were treated as
independent branches and were unconnected. But in nineteenth century, Faraday and
Maxwell along with others unified these independent branches of physics. They proved
that all three phenomena are manifestations of electromagnetic field.
The simplest example is the electric field of an electric charge that exerts a force an
another charge when it comes in the range. An electric current produces a magnetic field
that exerts a force on magnetic materials.
Such fields can travel through space, independent of charge and magnet, in the form of
electromagnetic wave. The best example of electromagnetic wave is light. Finally,
Einstein unified space, time and gravity in his theory of relativity.
Quantum mechanics also unified two branches of science: physics and chemistry.
In previous developments in physics, fundamental concepts were not different from
those of everyday experience, such as particle, position, speed, mass, force, energy and
even field. These concepts are referred as 'classical'.
The world of atoms cannot be described and understood with these concepts. For atoms
and molecules, the ideas and concepts used in dealing with objects in day to day life is
not sufficient. Thus, it needed new concepts to understand the properties of atoms.
A group of scientists W. Heisenberg, E. Schroedinger, P.A.M. Dirac, W. Pauli, M. Born and
Neils Bohr, conceived and formulated these new ideas in the beginning of 20 th century.
This new formulation, a branch of physics, was named as quantum mechanics.
Limitations of Classical Mechanics
The classical physics is complete and beautiful in explaining daily experiences where big
bodies are involved. But it breaks down severely at subatomic level and failed to explain
some of the phenomenon totally.
The phenomenas which classical physics failed to explain are black body radiation,
photoelectric effect, emission of X-rays, etc.
In classical physics, a body which is very small in comparison with other body is termed
as 'particle'. Whereas in quantum mechanics, the body which cannot be divided further
is termed as 'particle'.
The other main difference is the quantized energy state. In classical physics, an
oscillating body can assume any possible energy. On the contrary, quantum mechanics
says that it can have only descrete non-zero energy.
Need of Quantum Mechanics
Classical mechanics successfully explained the motions of object which are observable
directly or by instruments like microscope. But when classical mechanics is applied to the
particles of atomic levels, it fails to explain actual behaviour. Therefore, the classical
mechanics cannot be applied to atomic level, e.g. motion of an electron in an atom.
Other phenomenas which classical mechanics failed to explain are black body radiation,
photoelectric effect, emission of X-rays, etc.
The above problems were solved by Max Planck in 1900 by the introduction of the
formula
E = nh … (1)
where, n = 0, 1, 2, … ,
h = Planck's constant = 6.63 10–34 J/s
This is known as 'quantum hypothesis' and marked the beginning of modern physics.
The whole microscopic world obeys the above formula.
00
A particle is located at some definite point and it has mass. It can move from place to
place. A particle gains energy when it is accelerated and it loses energy when it is slowed
down.
A particle is characterized by mass m, velocity v, momentum p, and energy E.
Looking at the above facts, it might appear difficult to accept wave particle duality of
radiation, i.e. radiation is a wave which is spread out over all space and that it is also a
particle which is localised at a point in space.
But this wave particle duality of radiation has to be accepted because, sometimes
radiation has to be assigned the behaviour of a wave and at other times radiation is to
be assigned particle nature as discussed below.
The phenomena of interference, diffraction and polarisation require the presence of two
or more waves at the same time and at the same position. It is very clear that two or
more particles cannot occupy the same position at the same time. So one has to
conclude that radiation behaves like waves.
Spectra of black body radiation, production and scattering of X-rays, Compton effect,
photoelectric effect, etc. could not be explained on wave nature of radiation. These
phenomena established that radiant energy interacts with matter in the form of photons
or quanta. With this, Planck's quantum theory came into being to conclude that
radiation behaves like particles.
Thus, radiation sometimes behaves as a wave and at some other times as a particle. It is
to be noted that radiation cannot simultaneously exhibit its wave and particle properties.
Now, wave-particle duality of radiation is universally accepted.
00
believed that motion of electron within an atom is guided by a peculiar kind of
waves called 'Pilot waves'.
While adverting the concept of matter waves, De Broglie was guided by wave - particle
duality of radiation and the way in which nature manifests herself.
De Broglie put forth following arguments:
Nature manifests herself mainly as matter and radiation, and nature loves symmetry.
So wave particle duality of radiation points to similar duality of matter.
The principle of least action in mechanics and the principle of least time in optics
imply similar conditions. This close analogy of these two principles from two
different branches of physics, shows the probability of the behaviour of matter as a
wave like entity under suitable circumstances. This close parallelism between
mechanics and optics also indicates similarity between matter and radiation, i.e. if
radiation has dual nature then matter must also have similar wave-particle duality.
Bohr orbits are of definite size and are selected by quantum rules. The radii of these
quantum orbits are proportional to the square of integral numbers
h2 0
rn = 2 , n and electrons stay in these orbits for a considerable time without
2
me
radiating energy. Thus, the stable non-radiating orbits of electrons in an atom are
governed by integer rules. Now the only phenomena involving integers in physics
are those of interference and modes of vibration of a stretched string, and both of
them imply wave motion. So there must be a latent relationship between Bohr orbits
and integers associated with them. This latent relationship can be understood by
considering the length of a Bohr orbit as consisting of integral number of
wavelengths (equal to the principal quantum number of the orbit) of the waves
associated with electrons moving in that orbit.
00
h
Now, the quantum condition for Bohr orbits is mvr = n . So the principal quantum
2
2mvr
number n = , and 'De Broglie wavelength' can be obtained by dividing the
h
circumference 2r of the nth permissible orbit by its principal quantum number n.
2r
So, =
n
2r
=
(2mvr/h)
h
=
mv
This expression for De Broglie wavelength, agrees with the one he postulated, namely
Planck's constant
= , on the basis of his hypothesis of matter waves.
momentum of the particle
According to wave mechanics, electrons move around the nucleus as wave-packets
which are formed in a somewhat similar manner as standing waves are formed.
Wavelength of Matter Waves or De Broglie Wavelength
By De Broglie's hypothesis, a moving material particle is associated with a wave whose
wavelength is called De Broglie wavelength and it is given by the ratio of Planck's
constant to the momentum of the particle.
h h
= =
p mv
where p is the momentum of the particle, m its mass, and v the velocity.
We can arrive at this expression for De Broglie wavelength, (1) by analogy with radiation
and (2) by relativistic considerations.
De Broglie Wavelength by Analogy with Radiation
By Einstein's mass-energy relation, we have
E = mc2 (1)
where E is the energy equivalent of mass m, and c is the velocity of light.
By Planck's quantum theory of radiation, the energy of a photon is given by
E = h (2)
where h is Planck's constant and is the frequency of oscillations.
From equations (1) and (2), we get
h = mc2
c
But = , (Since velocity = frequency wavelength)
00
c
h · = mc2
h h
or = = (3)
mc p
where p = mc is the momentum associated with the photon and is its wavelength.
De Broglie Wavelength in terms of K.E. of the Particle
The momentum of a particle of mass m moving with velocity v is given by p = mv; and
the De Broglie wavelength associated with the particle is given by
h h
= = (1)
mv p
The K.E. of the particle is given by
1
E = mv2
2
m2 v2 p2
E = =
2m 2m
Group of waves
Consider the superposition of two waves of equal amplitude a, different angular
frequencies 1 and 2, and propagation constants k1 and k2.
Let y1 = a sin (1t – k1x)
and y2 = a sin (2 t – k2x)
The resultant will be
y = y1 + y2
y = a [sin (1t – k1x) + sin (2t – k2 x)]
(1 – 2) t (k1 – k2) x (1 + 2) t (k1 + k2) x
y = 2a cos – sin –
2 2 2 2
00
. . A+B A – B
. sin A + sin B = 2 sin 2 cos 2
(1 + 2)
The resultant wave has the angular frequency and its amplitude is
2
(1 – 2) t (k1 – k2) x
A = 2a cos –
2 2
Thus, the amplitude of the wave group is modulated both in space and time. The
velocity with which this envelope moves is given by
1 – 2 d
vg = = … (1)
k1 – k2 dk
This is the general formula for a group velocity.
To Show that, Group Velocity vg is Equal to Particle Velocity v
Consider a particle whose kinetic energy is
1 p2
E = mv2 = … (1)
2 2m
where p = mv = momentum
We have, E = h
h
E = H , where H = and = 2 … (2)
2
h
The De Broglie wavelength is =
p
h h 2
p = =
2
p = Hk … (3)
Using equations (2) and (3), the energy equation (1) becomes
H 2 k2
H =
2m
Hk2
=
2m
Hkdk
which gives d =
m
d Hk
=
dk m
Hk d
i.e. vg = vg = dk
m
00
p
vg = (from equation (3)
m
mv
vg = =v
m
vg = v (4)
Thus, group velocity vg is equal to particle velocity v.
Hence the packet can guide the motion of the particle. A wave group or wave packet is
associated with a moving body and that the phase velocity (or wave velocity u) has no
physical significance.
Thus, De Broglie wave associated with a moving body is a wave group which travels with the
same speed as that of the body.
A wave motion appears in almost all branches of physics. A wave motion is defined as a
periodic disturbance travelling with finite velocity through a medium or space.
The simplest form of vibration is simple harmonic motion (S.H.M.) and a particle
executing S.H.M. acts as a source which radiates waves.
00
The wave motion provides a way for energy and momentum to move from one place to
another without material particles making that journey.
The waves can be classified according to their broad physical properties into mainly
three categories:
Electromagnetic waves which need not require any medium to propagate.
Matter waves which give the probability amplitude of finding a particle at a given
position and time.
Mechanical Waves: The mechanical waves are simplest one to understand because
they are produced by some sort of mechanical vibrations which we can see.
When a mechanical wave passes through a medium, the medium particles perform an
S.H.M. given by equation
y = A cos t … (1)
where A is the amplitude of the oscillation and = 2, where is the frequency.
This equation is applicable to all individual particles affected by the wave. Suppose the
wave is progressing forward with velocity v. If P is the origin of the wave, then a particle
at Q at a distance x from P will receive the wave x/v sec later than P did.
00
dx·dy·dz is 2 dx dy dz. Then, the wave function is called the 'probability density
amplitude'.
Since the particle is certainly to be found somewhere in space, we must have,
00
(x, y, z, t) = 0 (x, y, z) e– i t = 0 ( r ) e– i t (3)
where 0 (x, y, z) is the amplitude of the wave at the point considered.
Differentiating equation (3) with respect to time t, we get
= (– i ) 0 ( r ) e–i t = – i (4)
t
E
Now, = 2 and E = h or =
h
2E
=
h
Putting this value of in equation (4), we get
2E
= –i (5)
t h
Multiplying both sides of equation (5) by i,
2
i = i2 E
t h
h
E = i = iH (6)
2 t t
From equations (1) and (6), we get
8 2 m i h
2 + 2 t – V = 0
h2
– h2
Multiplying both sides of this equation by , we get
82 m
h2 i h
– 2 – +V = 0
8 m
2 2 t
h2 i h
– 82 m 2 + V = 2 t (7)
– h2 2
or 2m + V = i H t (8)
Equation (8) is called 'Schroedinger's time dependent wave equation'.
h2 – H2 2
Taking H = – + V =
2 + V as 'Hamiltonian operator'
8 2 m 2m
ih
and E = = i H as 'Eigen operator',
2 t t
equation (8) becomes
H = E (9)
00
APPLICATIONS OF SCHROEDINGER'S TIME INDEPENDENT WAVE
EQUATION
In quantum mechanics, the wave function of a system gives the description of that
system. We apply Schroedinger's wave equation to a system, and then solve it to find
the wave function of the system. We shall study how Schroedinger's time independent
wave equation can be applied to a system and then solved to find the energy and wave
function of the system under given conditions.
We also aim at learning characteristic properties of solutions of this equation and
comparing the predictions of quantum mechanics with those of Newtonian mechanics.
As simple applications of Schroedinger's time independent wave equation, here we shall
discuss the problems of:
Particle in a rigid box
Particle in a non-rigid box
Tunneling effect.
00
8 2m E n
where k = = (2)
h2 L
From equations (1) and (2),
n
(x) = 2 i A sin x (3)
L
Equation (3) gives Eigen functions corresponding to energy Eigen values
n2 h2
En = (4)
8 m L2
The complex conjugate of (x) is
n
(x) = –2 i A sin x
L
To evaluate the constant A, we use the normalization condition.
L
i.e.
* dx = 1
0
L
n
4 A2 sin2 L x dx = 1
0
1
This gives 2 A2 L = 1 or A =
2L
Putting this value of A in equation (3), we get the normalized wave function of the
particle as
2i n 2 n
n = sin x = i · sin · x (5)
2L L L L
00