0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views1 page

Partner Grading

The document is a peer-grading rubric for science lab notebooks, outlining criteria for evaluating various components such as the problem statement, hypothesis, experiment procedure, data collection, data analysis, and conclusion. Each section is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, with specific expectations for clarity and detail. The total score possible is 27 points.

Uploaded by

quaggy7311
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views1 page

Partner Grading

The document is a peer-grading rubric for science lab notebooks, outlining criteria for evaluating various components such as the problem statement, hypothesis, experiment procedure, data collection, data analysis, and conclusion. Each section is scored on a scale from 0 to 3, with specific expectations for clarity and detail. The total score possible is 27 points.

Uploaded by

quaggy7311
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Science Lab Peer-Grading Rubric

Notebook Owner’s Name: ________________________________ Period _____

Name of the lab (i.e. “Bouncy Ball Lab”): ________________________________

Grader’s Name: _____________________________ Today’s Date: ________

I. Problem (“P”): The purpose of the lab or the question to be answered


during the lab is clearly identified and stated. 3 2 1 0

II. Hypothesis (“H”): The hypothesis is stated as an "If, then, because"


statement. The variables (independent and dependent variables) are
clear. 3 2 1 0

III. Experiment/Procedure (E”): Procedures are listed in clear steps. Each


step is numbered in order and is a complete sentence. The steps are
detailed enough to repeat experiment as written. The procedure includes
a complete materials list. 3 2 1 0

IV. Data Collection/Observation (“O”): The data is in a table. It is neat and


accurate. Tables are titled and labeled with units (i.e. “cm” “grams” etc.).
3210

V. Data Analysis/Graph/Observation continued (“O” - continued): The


data is graphed (line or bar, for example). It is a neat and accurate
representation of the data. Each axis labeled with units. There is a specific
title. An appropriate scale is used. Variables are on the correct axis. 3 2 1
0

VI. Conclusion (“C”):


a. Problem: Restates the problem and the variables being tested in
the experiment, then summarizes the results. 3 2 1 0
b. Evidence: Restates and accepts or rejects the hypothesis.
Explains the results using specific numbers from the data. States
what was learned from the lab. 3 2 1 0
c. Analysis: Discusses the “uncontrolled” variables (things that may
have affected the independent and dependent variables), or
sources of error. Discusses changes to the experiment and/or
possible follow-up labs. 3 2 1 0
d. So What (Sum it up): Why is this investigation important? 3 2 1 0

Total Score: _______/ 27

You might also like