How To Format A Good Short Film Script
How To Format A Good Short Film Script
TIPS…
Scripts for our purposes should run between 15 to 25 pages.
Script title pages should include the title, the short story on which it is based and the
writers’ names.
Page numbers should occur in the upper right-hand corner of the script pages.
DO NOT forget to indicate the types of MUSIC, LIGHTING, SHOTS (angles, etc.).
TRANSITIONS and breaks in SCENES and SEQUENCES throughout.
This is a short article in which to deal with a big subject: how to write a good script for a short film. Rule
number one: there are no hard and fast rules. But, if your aim is to get your film funded, there are
definitely some guiding principles that will help to ensure that your project is taken seriously.
The World
Because of the need to establish an instantly recognisable world in order to get on with exploring a
character’s problem, it can be useful to set your film around a familiar event or ritual: a wedding, a
birthday party, the first day at school, tea with stuffy relatives, Christmas Day etc. With a setting of this
sort you can take for granted the audience’s familiarity with the situation and you have immediately placed
your characters into a story world full of barely suppressed emotions, which is always useful for
generating dramatic tension and story events. The other advantage to choosing a setting of this sort is
that it gives the story a finite time frame. Another popular setting for the short film is the journey. Most
short films focus on a pivotal, significant event in the life of the main character so that the story inevitably
takes the character on a metaphorical emotional journey and it can work well to use a literal journey as its
setting.
To summarize so far...
A good short film needs a story in which something happens that has a discernible effect on the main
character. All successful short films focus on one moment/event. That moment is likely to be:
one of universal significance-- a moment that is of significance to the protagonist (whether s/he knows it
at the time)-- one that produces a situation in which the stakes are high for the protagonist.
10 screenwriting
insights I wish I’d
had 25 years ago
by ALLEN PALMER on JULY 22, 2010
Over the last quarter century I’ve stumbled and lurched my way to some understanding of the
screenwriter’s craft. As our AFTRS Graduate Certificate of Screenwriting students begin their
journey, I thought I’d share the 10 things I wish I’d know when I started out.
If you’re making films to be viewed by the cinema-going public, it would seem pretty obvious
that you should seek to understand why people go the movies, wouldn’t it? Not to me. I
scratched around for about 6 years and had already written several very poor drafts of my first
screenplay without ever contemplating this fundamental question. Fortunately, the inspirational
UCLA English Professor, Lynn Batten, forced me to address the question – well, not so much
about movies but about stories and myths in general. Why do humans need cracking yarns?
Joseph Campbell’s The Power of Myth supplied the answer.
“What people are seeking is the feeling of being alive. They want to feel the rapture of being
alive”.
They want to be moved, guys. They want to identify with a character who’s struggling, as they
are, with the exquisitely frustrating dilemma of life, and who, in facing their greatest fear, draws
on their higher self. In my darkest hour in LA, this epiphany transformed my writing.
Most writers starting out think story is plot and when you ask them to tell you about their film
they’ll go, “Well, this happens, and that happens, and then this other things happens, and oh,
and I forgot to tell you, there’s this three-legged dog who can talk … “
However, once you understand that people want to be moved, you should realise that the main
game in story is not plot. It’s not the outer goal that ultimately triggers our emotions but the
inner journey. That’s not to say that the outer goal doesn’t matter. It does. It’s what gets the
punters into the cinema in the first place. But if the hero pursues the outer goal with no inner
change, no matter how spectacular your climax, no matter how many bodies or cars or
interplanetary spaceships you lay to waste in that final 20 pages and no matter how eloquent
that 3-legged dog is, we won’t be moved one jot. Plot matters but only because it’s what drives
the inner transformation. Plot isn’t the end. It’s just the means.
Blake Snyder bills his book, Save The Cat, as “the last book on screenwriting you’ll ever need”.
This is categorically NOT the book to which I refer. Save The Cat has some useful things to say
about concept but I’m not sure that it encourages writers to create films with soul.
McKee is treated like a screenwriting God. His expensive lectures are sold out and his book Story
is only marginally less popular than the Bible. Unfortunately, what he says about screenwriting
simply doesn’t resonate for me. By all means, check it out but the emotional journey isn’t
emphasised sufficiently for my liking.
If you are to only buy one book about screenwriting, please, please, let it be Chris Vogler’s The
Writer’s Journey.
Vogler, a Hollywood story analyst who’s consulted on films like Lion King, takes the Hero’s
Journey of mythology guru, Joseph Campbell, and makes it both accessible to the average
person and relevant specifically to the movies. It categorically changed my life.
There are 3 reasons why I love the Hero’s Journey and consider it the most useful story
paradigm for screenwriters.
i) It was not invented. It was merely identified. Joseph Campbell read stories from all
over the world, across all time, and found that every culture was telling the same story over and
over and over again. The monomyth. The hero’s journey is not the get-rich-quick gimmick of
some San Fernando Valley shyster. It’s the timeless storytelling blueprint of all humankind.
ii) The inner journey is intrinsic. I said the inner journey is what it’s all about and if you
subscribe to the Hero’s Journey you can’t not have your character go on an inner journey. The
Hero’s Journey doesn’t so much describe plot elements as identity stages in the transformation
of your character. Become a Campbell/Vogler devotee, and your focus will shift automatically
from plot to emotion. And that, my friends, is where it’s at.
iii) It works. It’s worked for the great films – even if the writers weren’t aware they were
following its conventions. It’s worked for George Lucas – who consulted Campbell on the early
Star Wars films. It’s worked for George Miller. George is a huge Campbell fan and it’s no
coincidence that he’s been Australia’s most successful filmmaker on the international stage. It’s
worked for millions of storytellers for thousands of years so there’s a good chance it might just
work for you.
If you haven’t got this book, buy it. If you haven’t read it, pick it up and see how it applies to the
films you love. And if you want to spend a day exploring this amazing gift, come to my
Introduction to Screenwriting course. The Hero’s Journey is the foundation to everything I
teach.
Update: You might be interested in these 2 more recent articles about the Hero’s Journey:
Where I disagree with the Hero’s Journey – on character arc
One of the most useful courses I did in LA was not a screenwriting class but a script reader’s
class with seasoned story analyst, Peter Exline (who, incidentally, was one of the inspirations for
The Dude in The Big Lebowski). In that course, I learnt 2 incredibly valuable lessons and one
was the 27 word concept test.
Some people say that a logline – the description of the film’s concept – can be 2 or 3 sentences.
Exline placed a much tighter constraint on the logline. He said it should be just one sentence of
27 words.
Film demands simple ideas. Complex plots but simple ideas. If you can’t express your idea in a
single sentence of 27 words, you’re going to struggle on two grounds:
ii) The marketing department will have the devil’s own job in trying to market your film.
The 27-word concept test interrogates the dramatic engine of your film and is just about the
most valuable tool in the screenwriter’s toolkit. Use it early. And use it often.
The other piece of gold I picked up in Peter Exline’s class was that there are 4 basic questions a
screenwriter should be able to answer about their story:
This might seem obvious to you but it was a revelation to me and I can tell you that 90%
screenplays fail these basic tests. It’s not clear whose story it is, the goal isn’t distinguished in a
way that will allow us to know when they’ve crossed the finish line, the forces of antagonism
aren’t great enough or it doesn’t matter enough to the character so why should we care?
These elements shouldn’t just be obvious in your overall story but in each scene. Who wants
what in this scene and why? Who is stopping them trying to get it and how do they thwart our
hero?
Without these elements, you don’t have conflict. No conflict, no drama. No drama, no chance of
screenwriting glory.
In our first class of Dramatic Storytelling in the Grad Cert last week, we watched the opening
scene of The Godfather and I asked my writers, why do we find the Don engaging and one of the
first things someone said was, “The cat”. Spot on. The mafia boss is stroking a cat.
Now, antagonists in James Bond and Austin Powers films have given cat-stroking a bad rap, but
what was the intention of the writer here with this touch of domesticity? To provide a
counterpoint to the expectations of the stereotype. It’s a contradiction and it’s the key to great
characterisation.
Think about Indiana Jones. Dashing, brave, handsome, fearless. Well, not quite. He’s not too
keen on snakes. Contradiction.
Tony Soprano. Brutal, murderous, brothel-keeping, drug running mafioso? Yes. But in episode 1
his character crisis is triggered because a family of ducks no longer comes to his backyard
swimming pool. Contradiction.
And this is not just something that applies to heroes. Think about Anton Sugar (Javier Bardem)
in No Country for Old Men. What makes him one of the great antagonists? Not just that he
blows people away with that weird gas cylinder weapon. It’s that, when he fears that the guy in
the remote truck stop might compromise him, he gives the poor sap a sporting chance. He flips a
coin. Heads you win, tails you get a cross city tunnel through your cerebral cortex. He also
intrigues us because he has an unbreakable ethical code. He said he is going to kill the guy’s wife
so kill her he must. He’s a psychopath but he’s a highly principled psychopath.
The key to characterisation is credibly building these sorts of opposites into your characters. It
stops them being clichés and helps the audience warm to them because no matter how great
they are, they’re flawed like us, and no matter how bad they are, they have redeeming qualities,
like we do on a good day.
Australian screenwriters are very secretive about their film concepts. What’s your film about? I
can’t tell you that!!! Go to LA and try to STOP someone telling you their idea. Not just writers in
your UCLA Extension class, but the guy at the sandwich shop or the barmaid at Hooters. They
constantly pitch their ideas and this is something I would encourage you to do too.
The danger with keeping your idea to yourself “until it’s finished” is that your idea, with all due
respect, might be crap. If you’re a writer just starting out, they generally are. It’s just the way it
is. Mine was crap and I wasted years of my life drafting and redrafting it because I didn’t bounce
it off anyone.
The other reason you should verbally tell your story to people in the early stages is because you
can tell as the words are coming out of your mouth whether it’s working or not. You don’t need
their glazed reaction to know you’ve got yourself a stinker or to hear their “so what happens
next“ to know you’re on a winner. You just know through some hard-wired storytelling instinct.
This is one place where I absolutely agree with Blake Snyder. Bounce your idea off people as
soon as you can. If it’s not working, try to reshape it. If they still say, “Yeah, it’s … nice” then
trash it and find a fresh vehicle to transport your genius to the world.
Read more about Why writers should take the oral before the written
The worst mistake a writer can make is to not write – to sit down at your desk only when you
feel “inspired”. You need to create a regimen and stick to it. If you can only manage 30 mins a
day, OK, but make sure you put in that half hour no matter what. There should be no excuse.
Work. Kids. Alien invasion. If you have the conviction, you’ll find the time. My routine at the
moment is to get up at 5.30am, which doesn’t sound too appealing but your body quickly adjusts
and I now automatically wake up at that time. Just ask my wife.
But the next mistake you can make is to think you will only solve that problem at the Act 2
Turning Point by continuing to wrestle with it on the page. You’re exhausted and cranky but you
are not going to give in ‘til you’ve found the answer. Bad move.
Do you do cryptic crosswords? I love them. But one of the amazing things I’ve found is that
something I might struggle with when I look at it on Friday morning is bleedingly bloody
obvious at Friday lunchtime. Why? Because my subconscious has had time to work on it. It’s the
same with your screenplay.
Your mind is an amazing bit of gear but you’ve got to start learning how to get the most out of it.
And that’s not by pounding it into submission. You need to become aware of the moment when
it’s ceased to be productive and back off. Go for a swim or walk the dog. Go play the piano,
guitar, or, in my case, plastic recorder. Do yoga or meditate. I’m amazed at the number of times
the solution will come to me when I’m not looking for the solution. I’ll be running around the
park and I’ll suddenly find myself seeing the answer and come out of the trance with no
recollection of how many laps I’ve done.
Your brain is a gift. And sometimes it does its best work when it seems not to be working at all.
Even if you are the greatest writer in the world, it’s going to take you time to develop your craft
and – here’s the problem – no-one is going to pay you to learn your trade. There were very few
screenwriting apprenticeships available down at Centrelink the last time I looked. So before you
can face the challenges of screenwriting in general and your current film in particular, you need
to answer a more fundamental question: how am I going to support myself while I learn my
craft?
I’ve tried every possible approach. For a long time I took incredibly poorly paid jobs that offered
great time flexibility (hostel manager in NY, pizza cook in Ireland, housekeeper to a countess in
London). On the plus side, you get a lot of writing done but on the down side, you make
enormous personal and social sacrifices. You tell yourself that it’s only until I finish this next
draft and then all of a sudden you’re 43, single with no assets, no super and about $20k in debt.
The other approach is to try to write while holding down a real job. On the plus side, you don’t
hide when the landlord knocks and you can afford a loaf of bread without having to search for
gold coloured coins down the back of the sofa. On the down side, the responsibilities and stress
mean your writing is too often sidelined and years go by without you making any meaningful
progress.
The best option I’ve found after years of trial and error is well-paid freelance work. Copywriting
for instance. If you’re good – and you won’t be without practice – you can make $100/hr and
sometimes $1000 a day so that you don’t need to work 5 days to earn a decent crust. If you have
some skill that allows you to earn a lot of money in a short time on a flexible basis, you can
create the window you need in your life to develop your craft. If not, you will be faced with a
choice: do I want lifestyle or do I really desperately want to be a writer? That’s a question only
you can answer.
When you’ve finally written your screenplay and you find a producer who says that they love it
and they want to option it, your response is, “Where do I sign?”, right? Wrong. Oh, so, very
wrong.
The writer-producer relationship is like a marriage. Only more important. It’s probably going to
take your producer 3 years to get your film up and possibly a whole lot longer. Producer Vincent
Sheehan just got funding approval for a film he started on 8 years ago. That is a long time,
particularly when people are poking and prodding around inside something very near and dear
to you. If you choose the wrong producer, the development process will drive you absolutely
insane and your baby will end up mutilated or murdered. I myself have been through this
nightmare scenario and it almost made me quit the game.
Choose a producer who knows one end of a story from the other and who obeys the first
commandment of the writer-producer collaborative process – that it’s the producer’s job to
identity what’s not working and the writer’s job to fix it. It’s amazing the number of producers
who will tell you, “Well, I’m not a writer but … “ and then proceed to dictate (literally) what they
expect to see in the next draft. That’s a recipe for a bad relationship and a tragic script outcome.
The pitfalls where producers are concerned don’t stop there. They might be wonderful
collaborators but that same sensitivity might make them lousy at getting your project read by
the people that matter. Producing, ultimately, is selling. Of course, on the flip side, great
salesman throughout history haven’t generally been renowned for their ethics.
Am I scaring you? Good. Make the wrong choice here and all your talent and hard work could
end up counting for nought.
So don’t hook up with the first producer who asks you out. Research the market and find
answers to these questions:
Play hard to get. Of course, in order to play hard to get, you have to have produced a screenplay
that gleams. But when you have laboured and sweated to produce that rare entity, don’t give it to
just any clown. Take some time and confer it on someone who’s going to give your screenplay its
best chance to delight and move the world. Sign in haste. Repent at leisure.
Conclusion
So that’s it. That’s not all I’ve learned. I hope. But these are the 10 things that would have made
the greatest difference to my career trajectory if someone had told me them all those years ago. I
hope that by getting the tips now, you can fast-track your path to screenwriting fulfilment.