2/14/2025

©IT-FIT-2024

NEW TECHNOLOGIES
IN IT APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT
code: 2101416

presented by: Dr. Tran Thi Minh Khoa

IoT

1. Prototyping Boards And Languages

2. IoT protocol stack
1. Messaging Protocols
1. IoT protocol stack
2. MQTT
3. AMQP
4. CoAP
5. HTTP
6. Others
2. Network Protocols
1. IPv4, IPv6
2. WiFi, Zigbee, Bluetooth, LoRaWAN, 6LoWPAN
3. Sensor Data Management (optional)
4. IoT vs. WoT
5. IoT Projects Architecture

1
 2/14/2025

IoT Protocol Stack

presented by: Dr. Tran Thi Minh Khoa

Networking Protocols and Standards for Internet of Things, Prof. Raj Jain

IoT Protocol Stack

Application/Session MQTT, SMQTT, CoRE, Security Management
(Messaging protocols) DDS, AMQP, CoAP, TCG, Oath IEEE 1905
HTTP, … 2.0, SMACK, IEEE 1451
Network Encapsulation 6LowPAN, 6TiSCH, 6Lo, ISASecure,
Thread, … ace, DTLS,
Routing RPL, CORPL, CARP, … Dice, …
DataLink WiFi, Bluetooth Low
Energy, Z-Wave, Zigbee
Smart, 3G/LTE, NFC,
802.11ah, 802.15.4e,
LoRaWAN, …

2
 2/14/2025

IOT MESSAGING PROTOCOLS

IoT Messaging protocols

● Session/Application Layer Protocols

1. Providing the abstraction of “message” (elementary unit of data communication
among IoT end-points).
2. Providing primitives for data communication/message exchange to the upper-layer
IoT applications.
3. Implementing specific networking paradigms (e.g. publish-subscribe or request-
response).
4. Providing additional reliability or security mechanisms.
5. Sometimes adaptation of pre-existing (not natively M2M) solutions

3
 2/14/2025

IoT Messaging protocols

● Based on the interaction paradigm, IoT messaging protocols can be
classified into two main categories:
○ Publish-subscribe protocols

○ Request-response protocols

IoT Messaging protocols

● Session/Application Layer Protocols … WHICH

protocols?
○ HTTP
○ MQTT
○ AMQP
○ CoAP
○ XMPP
○ DDS
○ …

4
 2/14/2025

Publish/subscribe paradigm: Overview

● Publish/subscribe is a popular communication paradigm involving the

presence of three actors:
○ Publishers: produce data in forms of events

○ Subscribers: declare their interest in specific events

○ Mediator: notifies to each subscribers every published event that matches its
subscription
● Roles of publishers/subscribers are purely logical
● The paradigm is general and can be applied on many different usecases
of distributed/networking systems.

10

10

Publish/subscribe paradigm: Overview

11

11

5
 2/14/2025

Publish/subscribe paradigm: Overview

12

12

Source: https://www.dis.uniroma1.it/~querzoni/corsi_assets/1112/SistemiDistribuiti/11-Pubsub.pdf

Publish/subscribe paradigm: Overview

Paradigm Characteristics
● C1. Many-to-many interactions

○ Same piece of information can be delivered at the same time to various consumers.
Each consumer receives information from various producers.
● C2. Space Decoupling
○ Interacting parties do not need to know each other . Message addressing is based on
their content.
● C3. Time Decoupling
○ Interacting parties do not need to be actively participating in the interaction at the
same time.

13

13

6
 2/14/2025

MQTT
Message Queuing Telemetry Transport Protocol

● Lightweight messaging protocol designed for M2M (machine to

machine) telemetry in resource-constrained environments.
● Proposed initially by Andy Stanford-Clark (IBM) and Arlen Nipper
in 1999 for connecting Oil Pipeline telemetry systems over
satellite.
● Released Royalty free in 2010 and as OASIS standard in 2014
○ MQTT (current specification 3.1/3.1.1)

○ MQTT for Sensor Networks (MQTT-SN)

14

14

15

15

7
 2/14/2025

MQTT
Message Queuing Telemetry Transport Protocol

16

16

MQTT
Message Queuing Telemetry Transport Protocol

17

17

8
 2/14/2025

MQTT
Message Queuing Telemetry Transport Protocol

18

18

MQTT
Message Queuing Telemetry Transport Protocol

19

19

9
 2/14/2025

MQTT
Message Queuing Telemetry Transport Protocol

20

20

MQTT
Message Queuing Telemetry Transport Protocol

21

21

10
 2/14/2025

MQTT
Message Queuing Telemetry Transport Protocol
● Despite using TCP, MQTT messages can still be lost …
1. TCP guarantees delivery on a single link (agent broker, or viceversa), what
about publisher subscriber delivery?
2. What about if the receiver is temporarily down while a sender is attempting
to send a message?

MQTT clients can request three level of Quality of Service (QoS) to the broker:
QoS Level 0 (fire & forget) default QoS level, clients do not store messages
and do not receive ACKs from broker, same delivery guarantees than TCP.
QoS Level 1 (deliver at least once)
Qos Level 2 (deliver exactly once)

22

22

MQTT Tutorial: http://www.steves-internet-guide.com/understanding-mqtt-qos-levels-part-1/

MQTT
Message Queuing Telemetry Transport Protocol

23

23

11
 2/14/2025

MQTT Tutorial: http://www.steves-internet-guide.com/understanding-mqtt-qos-levels-part-1/

MQTT
Message Queuing Telemetry Transport Protocol

24

24

Stefan Mijovic, Erion Shehu, Chiara Buratti, “Comparing Application Layer Protocols for the Internet of Things via Experimentation”, Proc. of iEEE RTSI 2016

MQTT
Message Queuing Telemetry Transport Protocol

25

25

12
 2/14/2025

[1] AMQP Protocol OASIS Specifications: http://docs.oasis-open.org/amqp/core/v1.0/os/amqp-core-overview-v1.0-os.html

AMQP
Advanced Message Queuing Protocol

27

27

AMQP
Advanced Message Queuing Protocol

28

28

13
 2/14/2025

AMQP
Advanced Message Queuing Protocol

29

29

AMQP
Advanced Message Queuing Protocol

30

30

14
 2/14/2025

AMQP
Advanced Message Queuing Protocol

31

31

https://www.cloudamqp.com/blog/amqp-vs-mqtt.html

AMQP vs. MQTT

32

32

15
 2/14/2025

IoT Messaging protocols

● Based on the interaction paradigm, IoT messaging protocols can be
classified into two main categories:
○ Publish-subscribe protocols

○ Request-response protocols

33

33

34

34

16
 2/14/2025

35

35

COAP Specifications: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7252#section-4.8

CoAP
Constrained Application Protocol

36

36

17
 2/14/2025

CoAP
Constrained Application Protocol

37

37

Overhead???
Lightweight???

CoAP
Constrained Application Protocol

38

38

18
 2/14/2025

CoAP
Constrained Application Protocol

39

39

CoAP
Constrained Application Protocol

40

40

19
 2/14/2025

CoAP
Constrained Application Protocol

41

41

CoAP
Constrained Application Protocol

42

42

20
 2/14/2025

CoAP
Constrained Application Protocol

43

43

CoAP
Constrained Application Protocol

44

44

21
 2/14/2025

CoAP
Constrained Application Protocol

45

45

N. Naik, Choice of Effective Messaging Protocols for IoT Systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP, Proc. of IEEE ISSE, 2017

Protocol Comparison

47

47

22
 2/14/2025

N. Naik, Choice of Effective Messaging Protocols for IoT Systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP, Proc. of IEEE ISSE, 2017

Protocol Comparison

48

48

N. Naik, Choice of Effective Messaging Protocols for IoT Systems: MQTT, CoAP, AMQP and HTTP, Proc. of IEEE ISSE, 2017

Protocol Comparison

49

49

23
 2/14/2025

Tran, K.T.M., Pham, A.X., Nguyen, N.P. et al. Analysis and Performance Comparison of IoT Message Transfer Protocols Applying in Real Photovoltaic System. Int J
Netw Distrib Comput 12, 131–143 (2024)

Conclusions

50

50

Conclusions

51

51

24
 2/14/2025

52

52

53

53

25