The document provides an introduction to semantics, focusing on the distinction between sentence meaning and speaker meaning. It discusses semantic properties, denotation, and connotation, emphasizing that meaning can vary based on context and speaker intent. Additionally, it outlines the goals of semantic theory within the broader field of linguistics, highlighting the importance of understanding similarities across languages.
The document provides an introduction to semantics, focusing on the distinction between sentence meaning and speaker meaning. It discusses semantic properties, denotation, and connotation, emphasizing that meaning can vary based on context and speaker intent. Additionally, it outlines the goals of semantic theory within the broader field of linguistics, highlighting the importance of understanding similarities across languages.
▪ The first step in working out a theory of what meaning is, is to recognize the distinction between: o Sentence meaning (or word meaning): is what a sentence (or word) means, i.e. what it counts as the equivalent of in the language concerned. E.g. “I can carry that suitcase” means “I have the ability to carry that suitcase.” o Speaker meaning: is what a speaker means (i.e. intends to convey) when he uses a piece of language. E.g. In saying “I can carry that suitcase,” the speaker is making an offer rather than a statement of his ability. 1.1. What is meaning?
▪ One must not equate meaningfulness with
informativeness. While it is true that many sentences do carry information in a straightforward way, it is also true that many sentences are used by speakers not to give information at all, but to keep the social wheels turning smoothly. E.g. - A: ‘Nice day’ - B: ‘Yes, a bit warmer than yesterday, isn’t it?’ ▪ The social relationships formed and maintained by the use of language are not all courteous and amicable. Speaker meaning can include both courtesy and hostility, praise and insult, endearment and taunt. 1.1. What is meaning?
▪ The same sentences can be used by different speakers on
different occasions to mean (speaker meaning) different things. Once a person has mastered the stable meanings of words and sentences as defined by the language system, he can quickly grasp the different conversational and social uses that they can be put to. ▪ Sentence meaning and speaker meaning are both important, but systematic study proceeds more easily if one carefully distinguishes the two, and, for the most part, gives prior consideration to sentence meaning and those aspects of meaning generally which are determined by the language system, rather than those which reflect the will of individual speakers and the circumstances of use on particular occasions. 1.1. What is meaning?
▪ Speakers can convey meaning quite vividly by using
sentences whose meanings are in some sense problematical. E.g. Hungry person at the dinner table: ‘I could eat a horse!’ 1.2. Semantic properties
▪ The meaning of a word can be analysed as having
different pieces of information upon which speakers of the language agree. E.g. The meaning of assassin has the following pieces of information: human, murderer, killer of important people. ▪ These pieces of information are called semantic properties. 1.3. Denotation and connotation
▪ We may distinguish between two types of meaning:
o Denotative: The type of meaning which may be described in terms of a set of semantic properties which serves to identify the particular concept associated with the word in question. o Connotative: Certain affective or evaluative associations based on certain characteristics of the item to which the word refers. E.g. The meaning of the word woman may be associated with attributes such as frailty, inconstancy, and irrationality. ▪ Connotative meanings vary from individual to individual, and community to community. 1.4. The study of meaning
▪ Semantics is an attempt to set up a theory of meaning.
▪ A theory is a precisely specified, coherent, and economical frame-work of interdependent statements and definitions, constructed so that as large a number as possible of particular basic facts can either be seen to follow from it or be describable in terms of it. ▪ In aiming to discover some system and pattern in an assortment of particular facts about the meanings of individual words, sentences, and utterances, it is obviously necessary to try to move from particular facts, to generalizations, i.e. statements about whole classes of items. 1.4. The study of meaning
▪ Semantics concentrates on the similarities between
languages, rather than on the differences. ▪ Semantic theory is a part of a larger enterprise, linguistic theory, which includes the study of syntax (grammar) and phonetics (pronunciation) besides the study of meaning. It is a characteristic of Linguistics as a whole that it concentrates on the similarities between languages. ▪ No theory is complete. That is, no matter how many facts a theory actually succeeds in explaining or predicting, there are always further facts in need of explanation, other facts about which the theory as yet makes no prediction (or possibly about which it makes a false prediction), and facts which do not seem to be readily describable in the terms provided by the theory. REFERENCES
Fromkin, V. et al. (1984). An introduction to language.
(Australian edition). Singapore: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Group Pty Limited, 1984. Hurford, J. R., Heasley, B. & Smith, M. B. (2007). Semantics: A course book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.