9h Class-TS-EM-Mathematics-1-Real Numbers
9h Class-TS-EM-Mathematics-1-Real Numbers
01
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Let us have a brief review of various types of numbers.
Consider the following numbers.
1 3 13 −5 213 −69 22
7, 100, 9, 11, -3, 0, − , 5, 1, , −1, 0.12, − , 13.222 ..., 19, , , , ,
4 7 17 3 4 1 7 5.6
John and Sneha want to label the above numbers and put them in the bags they
belong to. Some of the numbers are in their respective bags..... Now you pick up rest of the
numbers and put them into the bags to which they belong. If one number can go in more
than one bag then copy the number and put them in the relevent bags.
3
7
Q
Z 3 0, 7,
W -9,
0, -10,
7, , 9, 7,
7, 7,
0, 9, 7100, -3,
−3,3, 7
0, 1,
7,7,8, N 10,100
11, ... -2,-3
100 100
100,
101
You have observed bag N contains natural numbers. Bag W contains whole numbers.
Bag Z contains integers and bag Q contains rational numbers.
The bag Z contains integers which is the collection of negative numbers and whole
numbers. It is denoted by I or Z and we write,
Z = {... −3, −2, −1, 0, 1, 2, 3, …}
p
Similarly the bag Q contains all numbers that are of the form where p and q are
q
integers and q ≠ 0.
You might have noticed that natural numbers, whole numbers, integers and rational
p
numbers can be written in the form , where p and q are integers and q ≠ 0.
q
2 IX-CLASS MATHEMATICS
−15
For example, -15 can be written as ; here p = -15 and q = 1. Look at the Example
1
1 2 10 50
= = = ... and so on. These are equivalent rational numbers (or fractions). It
2 4 20 100
p
means that the rational numbers do not have a unique representation in the form , where
q
p
p and q are integers and q ≠ 0. However, when we say q is a rational number or when we
represent on a number line, we assume that q ≠ 0 and that p and q have no common factors
other than the universal factor ‘1’ (i.e., p and q are co-primes.) There are infinitely many fractions
1 1
equivalent to , we will choose i.e., the simplest form to represent all of them.
2 2
You know that how to represent whole numbers on the number line. We draw a line and
mark a point ‘0’ on it. Then we can set off equal distances on the right side of the point ‘0’ and
label the points of division as 1, 2, 3, 4, …
0 1 2 3 4
The integer number line is made like this,
Do you remember how to represent the rational numbers on a number line?
− 5 − 4 − 3 −2 − 1 0 1 2 3 4 5
3
To recall this, let’s first take the fraction and represent it pictorially as well as on number line.
4
3
We know that in , 3 is the numerator and 4 is the denominator.
4
Which means that 3 parts are taken out of 4 equal parts from a given unit.
3
Here are few representations of .
4
1234
4444
-1 0 1 1 2
2
3 3
4 (Pictorially) 4 (Number line)
5 5
Example-1. Represent and − on the number line.
3 3
Solution : Draw an integer line representing −2, −1, 0, 1, 2.
-7 -2 -5 -4 -1 -2 -1 0 1 2 1 4 5 2 7
3 (= -6 ) 3 3 ( = -3 ) 3 3 3 3 (= 3 ) 3 3 (= 6 ) 3
3 3 3 3
Divide each unit into three equal parts to the right and left sides of zero respectively.
5
Take five parts out of these. The fifth point on the right of zero represents and the fifth
3
−5
one to the left of zero represents .
3
DO THIS
−3 p
1. Represent on the number line. 2. Write 0, 7, 10, -4 in form.
4 q
3. Guess my number : Your friend chooses an integer between 0 and
100. You have to find out that number by asking questions, but your
friend can answer only in ‘yes’ or ‘no’. What strategy would you
use?
Example-2. Are the following statements True? Give reasons for your answers with an
example.
i. Every rational number is an integer.
ii. Every integer is a rational number
iii. Zero is a rational number
7
Solution : i.False: For example, is a rational number but not an integer.
8
p
ii. True: Because any integer can be expressed in the form (q ≠ 0) for example
q
−2 −4
-2 = = . Thus it is a rational number.
1 2
b
(i.e. any integer ‘b’ can be represented as )
1
0 0 0 p
iii. True: Because 0 can be expressed as , , ( form, where p, q are integers
2 7 13 q
and q ≠ 0)
0
(‘0’ can be represented as where ‘x’ is an integer and x ≠ 0)
x
Solution :
Method-I : We know that the rational number that lies between two rational numbers
a+b
a and b can be found using mean method i.e. .
2
a+b
Here a = 3 and b = 4, (we know that is the mean of two integers ‘a’, ‘b’ and it
2
lies between ‘a’ and ‘b’)
(3 + 4) 7 7
So, = which is in between 3 and 4. 3 < < 4
2 2 2
7
If we continue the above process, we can find many more rational numbers between 3 and
2
3 + 72 6+27 132 13 13
= = = =
2 2 2 2× 2 4
13 7
3< < < 4
4 2
Method-II : The other option to find two rational numbers in single step.
Since we want two numbers, we write 3 and 4 as rational numbers with denominator 2 + 1
=3
3 6 9 4 8 12 16
i.e., 3 = = = and 4 = = = =
1 2 3 1 2 3 4
10 11
Then you can see that , are rational numbers between 3 and 4.
3 3
9 ⎛ 10 11 ⎞ 12
3= <⎜ < ⎟< =4
3 ⎝ 3 3⎠ 3
Now if you want to find 5 rational numbers between 3 and 4, then we write 3 and 4
as rational number with denominator 5 + 1 = 6.
18 24 18 ⎛ 19 20 21 22 23 ⎞ 24
i.e. 3 = and 4 = 3= < ⎜ , , , <, ⎟= 4
6 6 6 ⎝ 6 6 6 6 6 ⎠ 6
From this, you might have realised the fact that there are infinitely many rational
numbers between 3 and 4. Check, whether this holds good for any other two rational
numbers? Thus we can say that , there exist infinite number of rational numbers between
any two given rational numbers.
DO THIS
i. Find any five rational numbers between 2 and 3 using mean method.
3 8
ii. Find any 10 rational numbers between − and .
11 11
7 10
Example-4. Express , and 2 in decimal form.
16 7 3
Solution : 0.4375 1.428571 0.666
16 7.00000 7 10 3 2.0000
0 7 18
70 30 20
64 28 18
60 20 20
48 14 18
120 60 2
112 56
80 40
80 35
0 50 2
10 49 ∴ = 0.666 = 0.6
7 ∴ =1.428571 3
∴ = 0.4375 7
16 10 is a non-terminating
is a non-terminating
is a terminating decimal 7 recurring decimal
recurring decimal
3
From above examples, we notice that every rational number can be expressed as a
terminating decimal or a non terminating recurring decimal.
DO THIS
1 1
Express (i) (ii) in decimal form.
17 19
p
Example -5. Express 3.28 in the form of (where p and q are integers, q ≠ 0 ).
q
328
Solution : 3.28 =
100
328 ÷ 2 164
= =
100 ÷ 2 50
164 ÷ 2 82
= = (Numerator and denominator are co-primes)
50 ÷ 2 25
82
∴ 3.28 =
25
p
Example-6. Express 1.62 in form where q ≠ 0 ; p, q are integers.
q
Solutions : Let x = 1.626262..... (1)
multiplying both sides of equation (1) by 100, we get
100x = 162.6262... (2)
Subtracting (2) from (1) we get
100x = 162.6262...
x = 1.6262...
- -
99x = 161
161
x =
99
161
∴1.62 =
99
TRY THESE
I. Find the decimal values of the following:
1 1 1 1
i. ii. iii. iv.
2 22 5 5× 2
3 27 1 7
v. vi. vii. viii.
10 25 3 6
5 1
ix. x.
12 7
Can you guess the character of the denominator of a fraction which can be in the
form of terminating decimal?
Write prime factors of denominator of each rational number.
What did you observe from the results?
EXERCISE - 1.1
XERCISE
3 11 13 41
(i) (ii) (iii) (iv)
25 18 20 42
1.2 IRRATION
RRATIONAL NUMBERS
TIONAL
Let us take a look at the number line again. Are we able to represent all the numbers
on the number line? The fact is that there are infinite numbers left on the number line.
43
34
–16 –9 –4 0 3 8 14
To understand this, consider these equations
(i) x2 = 4 (ii) 3x = 4 (iii) x2 = 2
For equation (i) we know that value of x for this equation are 2 and −2. We can plot
2 and −2 on the number line.
3x 4 4
For equation (ii) 3x = 4 on dividing both sides by, 3 we get = ⇒ x = . We
3 3 3
can plot this on the number line.
When we solve the equation (iii) x2 = 2, taking square root on both the sides of the
equation ⇒ x2 = 2 ⇒ x = ± 2 . Let us consider x = 2.
Can we represent 2 on number line ?
What is the value of 2 ? To which numbers does 2 belong?
Let us find the value of 2 by long division method.
1.4142135
1 2. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Step 1 : After 2, place decimal point.
1 Step 2 : After decimal point write 0’s.
24 100 Step 3 : Group ‘0’ in pairs and put a bar
96 over them.
281 400 Step 4 : Then follow the method to find
281 the square root of perfect square.
2824 11900
11296
28282 60400
56564
282841 383600
282841
2828423 10075900
8485269
28284265 159063100
141421325
28284270 17641775 ∴ 2 = 1.4142135 …
Now, can you classify the numbers in the table as rational and irrational numbers?
2 p
Kruthi said
2 can be written as 1 which is in q form. So 2 is a rational
number. Do you agree with her argument ?
Know About π
c
π is defined as the ratio of the circumference (C) of a circle to its diameter (d). i.e. π =
d
As π is in the form of ratio, this seems to contradict the fact that π is irrational. The
circumference (C) and the diameter (d) of a circle are incommensurable. i.e. there does
not exist a common unit to measure that allows us to measure the both numerator and
denominator. If you measure accurately then atleast either C or d is irrational. So π is
regarded as irrational.
The Greek genius Archimedes was the first to compute the value of π . He
showed the value of π lie between 3.140845 and 3.142857. (i.e., 3.140845 < π <
3.142857) Aryabhatta (476-550 AD), the great Indian mathematician and
astronomer, found the value of π correctly upto four decimal places 3.1416. Using
high speed computers and advanced algorithms, π has been computed to over 1.24
trillion decimal places .
π =3.14159265358979323846264338327950 ….. The decimal expansion of π is
non-terminating non-recurring. So π is an irrational number. Note that, we often
22 22
take as an approximate value of π , but π ≠ .
7 7
We celebrate March 14th as π day since it is 3.14 (as π = 3.14159 ....). What a
coincidence, Albert Einstein was born on March 14th, 1879!
TRY THESE
Find the value of 3 upto six decimals.
By Pythagoras theorem OB = 12 + 12 = 2
C B
2 2
1
O 1
-7 -3 -5 -2 -3 -1 -1 0 1 A1 K3 2 5 3 7
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Fig. (i)
We have seen that OB = 2 . Using a compass with centre O and radius OB, draw an
arc on the right side to O intersecting the number line at the point K. Now K corresponds
to 2 on the number line.
3 1
C B
2
1 3
O A
1
K L
-7 -3 -5 -2 -3 -1 -1 0 1 1 3 2 5 3 7
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Fig. (ii)
Using a compass, with centre O and radius OD, draw an arc which intersects the
number line at the point L right side to 0. Then ‘L’ corresponds to
3 . From this we can
conclude that many points on the number line can be represented by irrational numbers
also. In the same way, we can locate n for any positive integers n, after n −1 has
been located.
TRY THESE
2 2 2
Locate 5 and − 5 on number line. [Hint : 5 = (2) + (1) ]
1 2
Example-9. Find any two irrational numbers between and .
5 7
1
Solution : We know that = 0.20
5
2
= 0.285714
7
1 2
To find two irrational numbers between and , we need to look at the decimal
5 7
form of the two numbers and then proceed. We can find infinitely many such irrational
numbers.
Examples of two such irrational numbers are
0.201201120111..., 0.24114111411114…, 0.25231617181912..., 0.267812147512 …
1 2
Can you find four more irrational numbers between and ?
5 7
(
(i) 3 + 3 + 3 − 3 ) ( ) (
(ii) 3 + 3 3 − 3 )( )
10
( )
2
(iii) (iv) 2 +2
2 5
Solution :
(i) (3 + 3 ) + (3 − 3 ) = 3+ 3 + 3− 3
= 6, which is a rational number.
(ii) (3 + 3 )( 3 − 3 )
We know that ( a + b )( a − b ) ≡ a 2 − b 2 is an identity.
( )(
Thus 3 + 3 3 − 3 = 32 − ) ( 3)
2
= 9 − 3 = 6 which is a rational number.
10 10 ÷ 2 5 5× 5
(iii) = = = = 5 , which is an irrational number.
2 5 2 5÷2 5 5
( ) = ( 2)
2 2
(iv) 2 +2 + 2. 2 .2 + 22 = 2 + 4 2 + 4
EXERCISE - 1.2
XERCISE
5 7
3. Find an irrational number between and . How many more there may be?
7 9
4. Find two irrational numbers between 0.7 and 0.77
ACTIVITY
Constructing the ‘Square root spiral’.
Take a large sheet of paper and construct the ‘Square root spiral’ in the following
manner.
Step 1 : Start with point ‘O’ and draw a line segment OP 1
S 1 R
of 1 unit length. T
1
4 3
Step 2 : Draw a line segment PQ perpendicular to OP of Q
2
unit length (where OP = PQ = 1) (see Fig) 1
Step 7 : Continue in this manner for some more number of steps, you will create a
beautiful spiral made of line segments PQ , QR , RS , ST , TU ... etc. Note
that the line segments OQ , OR , OS , OT , OU ... etc. denote the lengths
2, 3, 4, 5, 6 respectively.
1.4 Re pr esenting R
presenting eal n
Real umber
number
umberss on the Number line thr ough
through
Successiv
Successivee ma gnif
magnif ica
gnifica tion
ication
In the previous section, we have seen that any real number has a decimal expansion.
Now first let us see how to represent terminating decimal on the number line.
Suppose we want to locate 2.776 on the number line. We know that this is a terminating
decimal and this lies between 2 and 3.
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
2 3
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4
2.52.6 2.7 2.8 2.9
Fig.(i)
So, let us look closely at the portion of the number line between 2 and 3. Suppose we
divide this into 10 equal parts as in Fig.(i). Then the markings will be like 2.1, 2.2, 2.3 and
so on. To have a clear view, let us assume that we have a magnifying glass in our hand and
look at the portion between 2 and 3. It will look like what you see in figure (i).
Now, 2.776 lies between 2.7 and 2.8. So, let us focus on the portion between 2.7 and
2.8 (See Fig. (ii). We imagine that this portion has been divided into ten equal parts. The
first mark will represent 2.71, the second is 2.72, and so on. To see this clearly, we magnify
this as shown in Fig(ii).
2 3
2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4
2.5 2.6 2.7 2.8 2.9
2.7 2.8
2.71 2.72 2.73 2.74
2.752.76 2.77 2.78 2.79
Fig.(ii)
2.77 2.78
2.775
2.771 2.772 2.773 2.774 2.776 2.777 2.778 2.779
uYfi
(iii)
Again 2.776 lies between 2.77 and 2.78. So, let us focus on this portion of the number
line see Fig. (iii) and imagine that it has been divided again into ten equal parts. We magnify
it to see it better, as in Fig.(iii).
The first mark represents 2.771, second mark 2.772 and so on, 2.776 is the 6th mark
in these subdivisions.
We call this process of visualization of presentation of numbers on the number line
through a magnifying glass, as the process of successive magnification.
Now let us try and visualize the position of a real number with a non-terminating
recurring decimal expansion on the number line by the process of successive magnification
with the following example.
3.5 3.6
3.51 3.52 3.53 3.54
3.553.56 3.57 3.58 3.59
Step 2 :
3.58 3.59
3.585
3.581 3.582 3.583 3.584 3.586 3.587 3.588 3.589
Step 3 :
3.588 3.589
3.5881 3.5883
3.5885 3.5887 3.5889
Step 4 :
3.5888
3.58
EXERCISE - 1.3
XERCISE
1.5 OPERATIONS
PERATIONS ON REAL NUMBERS
We have learnt, in previous class, that rational numbers satisfy the commutative,
associative and distributive laws under addition and multiplication. And also, we learnt
that rational numbers are closed with respect to addition, subtraction, multiplication. Can
you say irrational numbers are also closed under four fundamental operations?
5
Example-13. Check whether (i) 5 2 (ii) (iii) 21 + 3 (iv) π + 3 are irrational numbers
2
or not?
Solution : We know 2 = 1.414... , 3 = 1.732... , π = 3.1415...
(i) 5 2 = 5(1.414…) = 7.070…
5 5 2 5 2 7.070
(ii) = × = = = 3.535… (from i)
2 2 2 2 2
(iii) 21 + 3 = 21+1.732… = 22.732… If q is rational and s is
irrational then q + s, q - s, qs
(iv) π + 3 = 3.1415… + 3 = 6.1415… q
and are irrational numbers
All these are non-terminating, non-recurring decimals. s
Thus they are irrational numbers.
Example-14.Subtract 5 3 + 7 5 from 3 5 − 7 3
Solution : (3 5 − 7 3) − (5 3 + 7 5)
= 3 5 −7 3 − 5 3 −7 5
= −4 5 − 12 3
= − (4 5 + 12 3)
Example-15.Multiply 6 3 with 13 3
Solution : 6 3 × 13 3 = 6 × 13 × 3 × 3 = 78 × 3 = 234
We now list some properties relating to square roots, which are useful in various ways.
Let a and b be non-negative real numbers. Then
(i) ab = a b
a a
(ii) = ; if b ≠ 0
b b
(iii) ( a + b )( a − b ) = a − b
(iv) ( a + b )( a − b ) = a − b
2
(v) ( a + b )( c + d ) = ac + ad + bc + bd
( a + b ) = a + 2 ab + b
2
(vi)
(vii) a + b + 2 ab = a + b
Solution :
(i) ( 3 + 3 )( 2 + 2 ) = 6 + 3 2 + 2 3 + 6
( 2 + 3 )( 2 − 3 ) = 2 − ( 3 ) = 4 - 3 = 1
2
2
(ii)
( 5 + 2 ) = ( 5 ) + 2 5 2 + ( 2 ) = 5 + 2 10 + 2 = 7 + 2
2 2 2
(iii) 10
(iv) ( 5 − 2 )( 5 + 2 ) = ( 5 ) − ( 2 ) = 5 − 2 = 3
2 2
= 3+ 2 + 2⋅ 3 ⋅ 2 ∵ a + b + 2 ab = a + b
= 3+ 2
2
Now can we plot on the number line ? It lies between 0(zero) and 2.
2
DO THIS
1 3 1
Find rationalising factors of the denominators of (i) (ii) (iii) .
2 3 5 8
1
Example-18.Rationalise the denominator of
4+ 5
( )(
Solution : We know that a + b a − b = a 2 − b )
1
Multiplying the numerator and denominator of by 4 − 5
4+ 5
1 4− 5 4− 5 4− 5 4− 5
× = = =
( 5) 16 − 5
2 11
4+ 5 4− 5 42 −
1
Example-19.If x = 7 + 4 3 then find the value of x +
x
Solution : Given x = 7 + 4 3
7−4 3
= = 7−4 3
49 − 48
1
∴x+ = 7 + 4 3 + 7 − 4 3 = 14
x
1 1
Example-20.Simplify +
7+4 3 2+ 5
Solution : The rationalising factor of 7 + 4 3 is 7 − 4 3 and the rationalising factor of
2 + 5 is 2− 5 .
1 1
= +
7+4 3 2+ 5
1 7−4 3 1 2− 5
= × + ×
7+4 3 7−4 3 2+ 5 2− 5
7−4 3 2− 5
= 2 +
7 − (4 3)2 2 2 − ( 5)2
7−4 3 2− 5
= +
49 − 48 (4 − 5)
7−4 3 2− 5
= +
1 (−1)
= 7 −4 3 − 2+ 5 = 5− 4 3 + 5
⎧a m −n if m > n
m n mn am⎪
m
i) a .a = a n m +n ii) (a ) = a iii) n = ⎨ 1 if m = n
a ⎪ n1−m if m < n
⎩a
1
iv) a m b m = (ab) m v) = a−n vi) a0 = 1 (a ≠ 0)
an
Here a, b ‘m’ and ‘n’ are integers and a ≠ 0. b ≠ 0, a, b are called the base and m, n
are the exponents.
For example
1
i) 73.7 −3 = 7 3+ ( −3) = 7 0 = 1 ii) (23 ) −7 = 2 −21 =
221
23−7
iii) 4
= 23−7− 4 = 23−11 iv) (7)
−13
. ( 3)
−13
= ( 7 × 3)
−13
= ( 21)
−13
23
Suppose we want to do the following computations
4 1
2 1 ⎛ 1⎞ 35 1 1
i) 2 3 .2 3 ii) ⎜ 5 7 ⎟ iii) iv) 717 .1117
⎝ ⎠ 1
33
How do we go about it? The exponents and bases in the above examples are rational
numbers. Thus there is a need to extend the laws of exponents to bases of positive real
numbers and to the exponents as rational numbers. Before we state these laws, we need
first to understand what is nth root of a real number.
i.e., 2
9 =3
( )
1
If 52 = 25 then 25 = ( 25) 2 = 52
1
2× 12
25 = 5 i.e., 2
25 = 5 moreover 2
=5 =5
2
( )
1
If 23 = 8 then
1
3
8 = 2 (cube root of 8 is 2); 3
8 = 8 3 = 23 =2
3
( )
1
( )
1
( )
1
.............................................................................................................
( )
1
Solution : i) 2 3 .2 3 = 2
2 1
( 23 + 13 ) = 2 33 = 21 = 2
DO THIS
4
⎛ 17 ⎞ 4
Simplify:
5
ii) ⎜ ⎟ = 5 7
⎝ ⎠
(16 ) (128)
1 1
i. 2
ii. 7
Surd
urd
If ‘n’ is a positive integer greater than 1 and ‘a’ is a positive rational number but not nth
1/n th
power of any rational number then n
a (or) a is called a surd of n order. In general we
say the positive nth root of a is called a surd or a radical. Here a is called radicand , n is
called radical sign and n is called the degree of radical.
Forms of Surd
Here are some examples for surds. Exponential form a 1n
3
2, 3, 9, ..... etc Radical form n
a
1
Consider the real number 7 . It may also be written as 72 . Since 7 is not a square
of any rational number, 7 is a surd.
Consider the real number 3 8 . Since 8 is a cube of a rational number 2, 3
8 is not a surd.
1
⎛ 1 ⎞2 1
4
Consider the real number 2 . It may be written as ⎜ 2 2 ⎟ = 24 = 2 . So it is
⎜ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
a surd.
DO THIS
1. Write the following surds in exponential form
i. 2 ii. 3
9 iii. 5
20 iv 17
19
2. Write the surds in radical form:
1 1 2 1
i. 57 ii. 17 6 iii. 55 iv 142 2
EXERCISE - 1.4
XERCISE
i) ( 5 + 7 )( 2 + 5 ) (
ii) 5 + 5 5 − 5 )( )
iii) ( 3+ 7 )
2
iv) ( 11 − 7 )( 11 + 7 )
2. Classify the following numbers as rational or irrational.
( )
2
i) 5 − 3 ii) 3+ 2 iii) 2 −2
1
iv)
2 7
7 7
v) 2π vi)
3
( )(
vii) 2 + 2 2 − 2 )
3. In the following equations, find whether variables x, y, z etc. represent rational or
irrational numbers
2 2
i) x 2 = 7 ii) y = 16 iii) z = 0.02
2 17
iv) u = v) w 2 = 27 vi) t4 = 256
4
4. Every surd is an irrational, but every irrational need not be a surd. Justify your
answer.
6−4 2 7− 5 1 3 5− 7
i) ii) iii) iv)
6+4 2 7+ 5 3 2 −2 3 3 3+ 2
10 − 5
7. Find the value of upto three decimal places. (take 2 = 1.414 and
2 2
5 = 2.236 )
8. Find:
1 1 1
i) 64 6 ii) 32 5 iii) 625 4
3 2 −1
iv) 16 2 v) 2435 vi) (46656) 6
9. Simplify: 4
81 − 8 3 343 + 15 5 32 + 225
10. If ‘a’ and ‘b’ are rational numbers, find the value of a and b in each of the following
equations.
3+ 2 5+ 3
i) = a+b 6 ii) = a − b 15
3− 2 2 5 −3 3
11. Find the square root of 11 + 2 30
iii) ( a+ b )( )
a − b =a−b iv) ( a + b )( a − b ) = a 2
−b
( )
2
v) a+ b = a + 2 ab + b vi) a + b + 2 ab = a + b
1 a − b , where
10. To rationalise the denominator of , we multiply this by
a+b a −b
a, b are integers.
11. Let a > 0, b > 0 be a real number and p and q be rational numbers. Then
ap
i) a p .a q = a p + q ii) (a p ) q = a pq iii) q
= a p−q
a
iv) a p .b p = (ab) p
12. If ‘n’ is a positive integer > 1 and ‘a’ is a positive rational number but not nth power
1
of any rational number then n
a or a n is called a surd of nth order.