Introduction to Labour

Economics
 Why Labour Economics?
• Human resources allocate substantial time and energy to labour markets.
• Labor economics studies how labour markets work.
• Labour economics helps us understand and address many social and economic problems facing
modern societies
The employment relationship is one of the most fundamental relationships in our lives and this is
why it attracts a good deal of legislative attention.
Knowledge of the fundamentals of Labour economics is essential to an understanding of a huge
array of social problems and programs in Tanzania and elsewhere.
Economists who are actively involved in analysis and evaluation of public policies believe that
Labour economics is useful in understanding the effects of these programs.
Why do we need labour economics theories
• Explain and understand how labour markets work.
• Focus on the essential variables while leaving out other, less crucial, factors.
• Create a model that helps explain the theory.
The Labour Market
Labour is unique in several ways:
• Labour services can only be rented because workers cannot be bought and sold.
• Labour services cannot be separated from workers, therefore, the conditions
(nonpecuniary factors: environment, risk of injury, personalities of managers, perceptions
of fair treatment, and flexibility of work hours) under which such services are rented are
often as important as the price.
The circumstances under which employers and employees rent Labour services clearly
constitute a market, e.g. the Labour market (placement of people in jobs).
• Institutions – want ads and employment agencies facilitate contact between buyers and
sellers of services.
• Information about price and quality is exchanged in employment applications and
interviews.
• Contract between both parties spells out: compensation for time, conditions of work, job
security, and duration of the job.
 Definition of Labour Economics
Labour economics is the study of the workings of the market for Labour, which is
primarily concerned with the behavior of employers and employees in response to
the general incentives of wages, prices, profits, nonpecuniary aspects of the
employment relationship.

Labour economics will be conducted on two levels:

• Positive economics – “what is”
• Normative economics – “what should be.”
 Positive and Normative Economics
Positive Economics
Positive economics is a theory of behavior in which people are typically assumed to respond
favorably to benefits and negatively to costs, and underlying this theory of behavior are the basic
assumptions of scarcity and rationality.
Scarcity Means limited in supply
The persuasive assumption underlying economic theory of resource scarcity – and choices must be
made.
Rationality The basic assumption that people are rational – that means they have an objective,
which they pursue in a reasonably consistent fashion.

• For persons: the objective is utility maximization.

• For firms: the objective is profit maximization.

• The assumption of rationality implies a consistency of response to general economic incentives

and an adaptability of behavior when those incentives change.
Positive and Normative Economics
The Models and Predictions of Positive Economics

Behavioral predictions in economics flow more or less directly from the two fundamental
assumptions of scarcity and rationality
• Due to scarcity, workers continually make choices such as: look for other jobs, accept overtime, move
to another area, or acquire more education
• Employers also make choices: level of output, input mix in production
Economists assume that the choices and decisions made by employees and employers are
guided by their desire to maximize utility or to maximize profit, respectively

There are skeptics about the assumptions used in economics, but economists argue that the
theory underlying positive economics should be judged on the basis of its predictions, not
its assumptions.
Positive and Normative Economics

Any attempt to explain a complex set of behaviors and outcomes using a

few fundamental influences leads to the creation of a model – created to
strip away random and idiosyncratic factors

A Physical Model - Physicists can use simple calculations of velocity and gravitational pull
to predict where a ball will fall if it is kicked with a certain force at a given angle to the
ground – even though the prediction may not be accurate due to other forces ignored in the
calculations, but it will give the average tendencies of outcomes
 Positive and Normative Economics
The Models and Predictions of Positive Economics
An Economic Model – To really grasp the assumptions and predictions of economic models
with respect to scarcity and rationality, we consider the following examples:
• From the employee side of the market, we can assert that being subject to resource scarcity,
workers will prefer high-paying jobs to low-paying ones if all other job characteristics are the same
in each job – a highlight of the utility maximizing behavior of workers

• From the employer side of the market, we can also assert that firms need to make profit to survive,
and if they have high turnover, their costs will be higher than otherwise because of the need to hire
and train replacements – a highlight of the profit maximizing behavior of firms.
 The Model

• We note several important things about the assertions of utility maximization and profit
maximization:

 Employees and employers are both mindful of their scarce resources and are therefore
on the lookout for chances to improve their wellbeing.

 There is a negative relationship between wages and voluntary turnover by holding other
things equal – this relationship is supported by statistical studies or evidence.

 The assumptions of the theory concern individual behavior of employers and employees,
but the predictions are about an aggregate relationship between wages and turnover,
which can be tested using aggregate data.
 Positive and Normative Economics
Normative Economics
Normative economics is the study of what “should be,” and the theories of social optimality
are based in part on the underlying philosophical principle of “mutual benefits” – which
begins with the realization that there could be two kinds of economic transactions.
• One kind is entered into voluntarily because all parties to the transaction gain – as an
illustrative example, assume that:
 IFM is willing to pay someone TZS 25,000 per hour to do the job
 This Labour market transaction is beneficial to both parties if the hourly wage agreed upon is between
TZS 20,000 and TZS 22,000– Pareto efficiency.
• A second kind of transaction is one in which one or more parties lose – these transactions often
involve the redistribution of income, from which some gain at the expense of others (explicit
redistribution transactions are not entered into voluntarily unless motivated by charity).
 Remember that markets facilitate voluntary transactions.
 Governments make certain transactions mandatory – basis for public programs/policies.
 Market and Market Failure
Markets and Values Policies or transactions from which all affected parties gain can be said to be
Pareto-improving because they promote Pareto efficiency – unambiguously enhance social welfare and
they can be unanimously supported because:
• All parties who are affected by the transaction gain.
• Some parties gain and no one loses.
• Some parties gain and some lose from the transaction, but the gainers fully compensate the
losers.
Market Failure: Ignorance – People may be ignorant of some important facts and are thus led to
make decisions that are not in their self-interest – for example, a smoker who takes a job at an
asbestos plant may not know that inhaling asbestos dust and smoking substantially increased the risk
of disease.
Market Failure: Transactions Barriers – There may be some barriers to the completion of
mutually beneficial transactions:
• Laws may prohibit certain transactions –currently in Tanzania a professor retires at age 65
despite of how productive they are.
• The expense of completing the transactions.
 Market and Market Failure
Market Failure: Externalities – Market failure that arises when a buyer and a seller agree to a
transaction that imposes costs (negative externality or spillover) or benefits (positive externality/spillover)
on people who were not party to their decision.
• If all transaction costs and benefits fall on the decision makers, the transaction represents a step toward
Pareto efficiency – this means that decision was voluntarily accepted by all who are affected by it.
• Externalities would also exist if workers have no mechanism to transfer their costs of being injured to
their employers, who should be responsible for workplace safety.

Market Failure: Public Goods – Market failure that arises when a person is willing to consume a good or
service but he/she is not willing to pay the cost of its provision/production – “free rider problem.”
• Free rider problem can lead to under-investment in the provision of such good or service unless the
government can compel payments through its tax system.

Market Failure: Price Distortions – Market failure that arises when prices do not reflect the true
preferences of the parties to the transaction. Special barriers to transactions could come taxes, subsidies, or
other forces (price controls) that create “incorrect” prices.
 Normative Economics and Government Policy

Solutions to problems that prevent the completion of socially beneficial transactions

frequently involve governmental intervention – repeal the law
For other type of transaction barriers, government intervention could either compel
or actively promote transactions that are different from the ones that would be made
by “the market.”
Examples:
Capital Market Imperfections – If workers find it difficult to obtain loans – to be
used for various purposes – the government might intervene by making such loans
available to consumers even if it faced the same risk of default
Externalities – Government can use policies to intervene in its decision on the
mandatory school-leaving age by looking at the lifetime benefits of various schooling
levels and comparing them to both the direct costs of education and the opportunity
costs of lost production – internalize externalities
 Efficiency and Equity in the Labour Market
Efficiency versus Equity
The social goal of a more equitable distribution of income is often of paramount importance to
political decision makers.

The dispute is whether equity or economic efficiency should be the prime consideration in setting
policy.
• The first source of dispute is that there is not a unique set of transactions that are Pareto
efficient – a number of different sets of transactions can satisfy the definition of economic
efficiency but questions arise as to which set is equitable.

• The second source of dispute over equity and efficiency is deeply rooted in the problem that to
achieve more equity, steps away from Pareto efficiency must often be taken.
 Statistical Testing for Labour Market Hypothesis

A Univariate Test
 To test the relationship between wages and turnover or quit rates, we need to collect data.

 This type of analysis is called univariate because we are analyzing the effects of one variable (wage
rate – predictor or explanatory variable shown on the X-axis) on just one other variable (quit rate
– dependent variable on the Y-axis)

 Data collected for this type of test are called cross-sectional data because they provide observations
across behavioral units – cross-sections – at a point in time.

 Observations that provide information on a single behavioral unit over a number of time periods
are called time series data.

 Combination of cross-sectional and time-series data are called panel data.

Figure 1: Estimated Relationship between Wages and Quit Rates computed
from Table 1
Table 1

Q = 45 – 2.5Wi R2 = 0.67
 A Univariate Test
 Any straight line can be represented by the general equation of the form:
Y = a + bX (1)
where Y is the dependent variable; X is the independent or explanatory variable; “a” and “b” are
parameters or coefficients to be estimated – vertical intercept and slope

 We could model the relationship between the data in Table 1 and Figure1 as follows:
Qi = α0 + α1Wi + εi (2)
Qi and Wi are firm i’s quit rate and wage rate, respectively, α0 and α1 are the intercept and slope
parameters; and εi is the random error term – to capture unexplained factors .
 A Univariate Test
 Line YY in Figure 1A.1 is known as the line of best fit for the scatter plots A through J
 Line of best fit (YY) is the one that minimizes the sum of squared vertical distances between line YY and
each individual data points – YY is estimated using linear least squares regression analysis, which
yields:
Qi = 45 – 2.5Wi (3)
(5.3) (0.625)

where α0 = 45, this is the quit rate (Q) when W = 0

α1 = – 2.5, decrease in Q for every $1 increase in W
 From equation (1A.3), we can predict that if a firm paid $4 per hour in 1993, its annual quit rate will be
Qi = 45 – 2.5(4) = 35 percent
 A Univariate Test
 If firm i pays $18, its quit rate will be: Qi = 45 – 2.5(18) = 0 percent

 Note that the relationship between wages and quit rates cannot be assumed to be linear for
low and very high values of wages

 The estimated intercept (45) and the slope (– 2.5) are only estimates of the “true”
relationship, and there could be uncertainty associated with these estimates

 The uncertainty about each coefficient is measured by its standard error (SE) or the
estimated standard deviation (SD) of the coefficients
• SE or SD for the intercept term or constant (45) is 5.3
• SE or SD for the slope coefficient (– 2.5) is 0.625
• The larger the SE or SD the greater the uncertainty
 A Univariate Test
 Given the estimated coefficients and their SEs or SDs, we can test the hypothesis that the α1
coefficient is zero:
H0: α1 = 0 → no relationship between W and Q.
HA: α1 ≠ 0 → a relationship exists between both

 The t-statistics is used here to confirm or reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between W
and Q.
• computed t-value for α0 = 45/5.3 = 8.49
• computed t-value for α1 = – 2.5 /0.625 = |– 4.0 | = 4.0

 The computed t-statistics for both coefficients (α0 and α1)are statistically significant at the either
1% or 5% level
 Given the computed t-statistics for α1 to be 4.0, we can reject the null hypothesis of no
relationship between W and Q in favor of the alternative/research hypothesis, which shows the
true relationship is negative
 Multiple Regression Analysis
 The univariate analysis in the previous section assumed that the only variable that can
influence quit rate (other than εi = random factors) is a firm’s wage rate.
 Theoretically, there are many factors, other than the wage rate, that influence quit rates.
• Employee benefits, working conditions, firm size, age, and the level of
education/training of worker.
 Economic theory will indicate which variables should be included in any statistical
regression analysis and will suggest the direction of causation.

 If we assume that in addition to the wage rate (Wi), the other factor that can influence quit
rate (Qi) is the average age of the workforce (Ai), then we have:

Qi = β0 + β1Wi + β2Ai + εi (4)

 Multiple Regression Analysis
 Ai could be the age of firm i’s workers or the percentage of the firm’s workers older than
some age level – that is, Ai can be used as a dichotomous variable:
Ai = 0 if the average age of firm i’s workers is ≤ 40.
Ai = 1 if the average age of firm i’s workers is > 40.

 The parameters or coefficients – β0, β1, and β2 – of equation (4) can be estimated using
multiple regression analysis.

 Each RHS variable explains Qi, holding other independent variables constant.
 Note that when:
• Ai = 0, then Qi = β0 + β1Wi + εi → Qi = α0 + α1Wi + εi.
• Ai = 1, then Qi = (β0 + β2) + β1Wi + εi.
 The Problem of Omitted Variables
 Running a univariate regression when the situation requires multiple regression or leaving out
important explanatory variables in a multiple regression analysis will lead to omitted variables bias
– an important pitfall in hypothesis testing, which highlights the need to use economic theory to
guide empirical testing.

 For simple illustration, we assume that we know the true values of β0, β1, and β2 in equation (4)
and that there is no random error (each εi is zero). Then we have:

Qi = 50 – 2.5Wi – 10Ai (5)

• If Ai = 0 (average age ≤ 40), Qi = 50 – 2.5Wi → line Z0Z0

• If Ai = 1 (average age > 40), Qi = 40 – 2.5Wi → line Z1Z1

• This means that, given W, a firm’s quit rates will be 10% point lower if the average age of its
workforce is over 40.
Figure 2 True Relationships between Wages and Quit Rates
The Problem of Omitted Variables
 If the researcher ran the regression and omitted or ignored the fact that
average age affects quit rate, then we have:
Qi = α0 + α1Wi + εi (6)
 With omitted variable bias, the question is whether the estimated value
of α1 will correspond to the true slope of the Q/W relationship, which we
have assumed to be –2.5.
 The answer depends heavily on how average wages and average age of
employees vary across firm (Table 1A.2).
 Estimate of equation (1A.6) based on the data provided in Table 1A.2
yields:
Qi = 57 – 4Wi (7)
(5.1) (0.612) R2 = 0.91
 Computed t-statistics are: 11.18 and 6.54.
Table 2

Qi = 40 – 2.5Wi → line Z1Z1 Qi = 50 – 2.5Wi → line Z0Z0

Qi = 57 – 4Wi → line XX
 The Problem of Omitted Variables
 From Table 2, we see that:
• Quit rates are lower in the three firms (k, l, and m) that pay high-wage, and they tend to employ
older workers
who are less likely to quit.
• Quit rates are higher in the three firms (p, q, and r) that pay low-wage, and they tend to employ
younger workers who are more likely to quit.
 If the true slope coefficient (β1) is –2.5, with omitted variable bias, the newly computed
slope coefficient of –4 means that the estimated response overstates the sensitivity of the quit
rate to wages.
• Equation (7) ignores the effect that age has on quit rates.
• By omitting an important explanatory variable that affects quit rates and this is associated
with wage levels, spurious regression results will be obtained.
Figure 3 Estimated Relationships between Wages and Quit Rate
Using Data from Table 2