Lecture 3 Logics
Lecture 3 Logics
In philosophy, the study of logic falls in the area of epistemology, which asks:
“How do we know what we know?”
“Grass is green”
“2 + 5 = 5”
“Four is even”
Objective truth
Subjective truth
Truth that is relative, where the subject or observer’s perception of things
determines the truthfulness
Example “All men are mortal; Socrates is a man; thus Socrates is mortal” is
valid with all true premises and hence true conclusion.
Argument comes from the 14th-century French word of the same spelling,
meaning “statements and reasoning in support of a proposition." An
argument can be a fact used as evidence to show that something is true, like
a study that shows exercise improves certain health conditions — an
argument for being more active.
Premise 1: A car will not run without gas. Premise 2: I don’t have any gas in
my car. Conclusion: My car will not run. In the above example, both premises
are true (facts) and the conclusion is valid
Inductive and deductive logic are two different ways of reasoning that differ
in their approach, the type of conclusions they reach, and the strength of
those conclusions:
Inductive logic
A bottom-up approach that starts with specific observations and facts to form
general conclusions or predictions. Inductive conclusions are probabilistic,
meaning they may be incorrect even if the premises are true. For example,
you might conclude that all green apples give you a stomachache after
eating one that does.
Deductive logic
Here are some other differences between inductive and deductive logic:
How conclusions are reached