xF A C T O R

Unrestricted Factor Analysis

Release Version 11.05.01 x64bits

July, 2021
Rovira i Virgili University
Tarragona, SPAIN

Programming:
Urbano Lorenzo-Seva

Mathematical Specification:
Urbano Lorenzo-Seva
Pere J. Ferrando

Date: Friday, January 06, 2023

Time: 12:17:13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DETAILS OF ANALYSIS

Participants' scores data file : C:\Users\mvaim\Desktop\

Analisis doc en espa�a\Analisis definitivos\Analisis Factor\Base para factor.dat
Method to handle missing values : Hot-Deck Multiple Imputation
in Exploratory Factor Analysis (Lorenzo-Seva & Van Ginkel, 2016)
Missing code value : 999
Number of participants : 1185
Number of variables : 37
Variables included in the analysis : ALL
Variables excluded in the analysis : NONE
Number of factors : 1
Number of second order factors : 0
Dispersion matrix : Polychoric Correlations
Robust analyses : Bias-corrected and
accelerated (BCa; Lambert, Wildt & Durand, 1991)
Number of bootstrap samples : 500
Asymptotic Covariance/Variance matrix : estimated using bootstrap
sampling
Bootstrap confidence intervals : 95%
Method for factor extraction : Robust Unweighted Least
Squares (RULS)
Correction for robust Chi square : Robust Mean and Variance-
scaled (Asparouhov & Muthen, 2010)
Rotation to achieve factor simplicity : Robust Promin (Lorenzo-Seva
& Ferrando, 2019b)
Clever rotation start : Weighted Varimax
Number of random starts : 100
Maximum mumber of iterations : 1000
Convergence value : 0.00001000
Factor scores estimates : Estimates based on linear
model

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SOLOMON: A METHOD FOR SPLITTING A SAMPLE INTO TWO EQUIVALENT SUBSAMPLES

Lorenzo-Seva (2021)
When the sample is at least of 400 observations (i.e., the number of rows is larger
than 399), two subsamples are
computed using Solomon method. This method optimally splits the sample in two
equivalent halves, and guarantees the
representativeness of the subsamples (i.e., all possible sources of variance are
enclosed in the subsamples).
To assess how equivalents are the two subsamples, the Ratio Communatily Index is
reported: the closer its value to 1,
the most equivalent subsamples are.

Ratio Communatily Index = 0.999915

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GROUPS INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS

GROUP N N without missing values

First Solomon subsample 593 593
Second Solomon subsample 592 592

UNIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVES

Variable Mean Confidence Interval Variance Skewness Kurtosis

(95%) (Zero
centered)

V 1 1.614 ( 1.56 1.67) 0.559 0.751 -0.821

V 2 1.566 ( 1.51 1.62) 0.509 0.855 -0.584
V 3 1.375 ( 1.33 1.42) 0.433 1.516 0.921
V 4 1.907 ( 1.85 1.97) 0.607 0.163 -1.337
V 5 1.738 ( 1.68 1.80) 0.624 0.501 -1.228
V 6 1.489 ( 1.43 1.54) 0.549 1.140 -0.245
V 7 1.654 ( 1.60 1.71) 0.569 0.667 -0.955
V 8 1.416 ( 1.37 1.46) 0.422 1.294 0.435
V 9 1.620 ( 1.57 1.67) 0.529 0.722 -0.796
V 10 1.974 ( 1.92 2.03) 0.581 0.044 -1.276
V 11 1.634 ( 1.58 1.69) 0.538 0.695 -0.847
V 12 1.923 ( 1.87 1.98) 0.532 0.119 -1.113
V 13 1.274 ( 1.23 1.32) 0.349 2.022 2.785
V 14 1.719 ( 1.66 1.78) 0.644 0.550 -1.237
V 15 1.298 ( 1.25 1.34) 0.356 1.856 2.205
V 16 1.374 ( 1.33 1.42) 0.367 1.391 0.831
V 17 1.176 ( 1.14 1.21) 0.230 2.751 6.675
V 18 1.289 ( 1.25 1.33) 0.349 1.904 2.393
V 19 1.474 ( 1.42 1.53) 0.472 1.124 -0.059
V 20 1.559 ( 1.51 1.61) 0.515 0.884 -0.561
V 21 1.792 ( 1.73 1.85) 0.625 0.386 -1.302
V 22 1.409 ( 1.36 1.46) 0.416 1.315 0.501
V 23 1.408 ( 1.36 1.46) 0.458 1.382 0.518
V 24 1.637 ( 1.58 1.69) 0.591 0.723 -0.951
V 25 1.557 ( 1.50 1.61) 0.562 0.929 -0.622
V 26 1.237 ( 1.20 1.28) 0.272 2.142 3.655
V 27 1.501 ( 1.45 1.55) 0.429 0.952 -0.234
V 28 1.768 ( 1.71 1.83) 0.663 0.449 -1.350
V 29 1.591 ( 1.54 1.65) 0.551 0.821 -0.737
V 30 1.403 ( 1.35 1.45) 0.462 1.414 0.578
V 31 1.548 ( 1.49 1.61) 0.597 0.977 -0.637
V 32 1.446 ( 1.39 1.50) 0.466 1.231 0.165
V 33 1.635 ( 1.58 1.69) 0.571 0.718 -0.909
V 34 1.442 ( 1.39 1.49) 0.481 1.262 0.184
V 35 1.478 ( 1.43 1.53) 0.481 1.118 -0.093
V 36 1.397 ( 1.35 1.45) 0.432 1.400 0.643
V 37 1.570 ( 1.52 1.62) 0.517 0.850 -0.611

Polychoric correlation is advised when the univariate distributions of ordinal

items are
asymmetric or with excess of kurtosis. If both indices are lower than one in
absolute value,
then Pearson correlation is advised. You can read more about this subject in:

Muthén, B., & Kaplan D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor
analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and
Statistical Psychology, 38, 171-189. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x
Muthén, B., & Kaplan D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor
analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British
Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 19-30. doi:10.1111/j.2044-
8317.1992.tb00975.x

BAR CHARTS FOR ORDINAL VARIABLES

Variable 1

Value Freq
|
0 1 |
1 645 | ****************************************
2 349 | *********************
3 190 | ***********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 161.3 322.5 483.8 645.0

Variable 2

Value Freq
|
1 670 | ****************************************
2 359 | *********************
3 156 | *********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 167.5 335.0 502.5 670.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 2

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 3

Value Freq
|
1 859 | ****************************************
2 208 | *********
3 118 | *****
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 214.8 429.5 644.3 859.0
 Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 3
You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 4

Value Freq
|
1 420 | ************************************
2 455 | ****************************************
3 310 | ***************************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 113.8 227.5 341.3 455.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 4

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 5

Value Freq
|
1 566 | ****************************************
2 364 | *************************
3 255 | ******************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 141.5 283.0 424.5 566.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 5

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 6

Value Freq
|
1 782 | ****************************************
2 226 | ***********
3 177 | *********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 195.5 391.0 586.5 782.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 6

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 7

Value Freq
|
1 613 | ****************************************
2 369 | ************************
3 203 | *************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 153.3 306.5 459.8 613.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 7

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 8

Value Freq
|
 1 798 | ****************************************
2 281 | **************
3 106 | *****
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 199.5 399.0 598.5 798.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 8

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 9

Value Freq
|
1 624 | ****************************************
2 387 | ************************
3 174 | ***********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 156.0 312.0 468.0 624.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 9

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 10

Value Freq
|
1 360 | *****************************
2 496 | ****************************************
3 329 | **************************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 124.0 248.0 372.0 496.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 10

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 11

Value Freq
|
1 615 | ****************************************
2 389 | *************************
3 181 | ***********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 153.8 307.5 461.3 615.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 11

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 12

Value Freq
|
1 364 | **************************
2 548 | ****************************************
3 273 | *******************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 137.0 274.0 411.0 548.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 12

 You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 13

Value Freq
|
1 949 | ****************************************
2 147 | ******
3 89 | ***
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 237.3 474.5 711.8 949.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 13

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 14

Value Freq
|
1 595 | ****************************************
2 328 | **********************
3 262 | *****************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 148.8 297.5 446.3 595.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 14

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 15

Value Freq
|
1 919 | ****************************************
2 179 | *******
3 87 | ***
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 229.8 459.5 689.3 919.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 15

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 16

Value Freq
|
1 821 | ****************************************
2 285 | *************
3 79 | ***
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 205.3 410.5 615.8 821.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 16

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 17

Value Freq
|
1 1026 | ****************************************
 2 109 | ****
3 50 | *
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 256.5 513.0 769.5 1026.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 17

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 18

Value Freq
|
1 927 | ****************************************
2 173 | *******
3 85 | ***
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 231.8 463.5 695.3 927.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 18

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 19

Value Freq
|
1 755 | ****************************************
2 298 | ***************
3 132 | ******
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 188.8 377.5 566.3 755.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 19

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 20

Value Freq
|
1 682 | ****************************************
2 344 | ********************
3 159 | *********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 170.5 341.0 511.5 682.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 20

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 21

Value Freq
|
1 519 | ****************************************
2 393 | ******************************
3 273 | *********************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 129.8 259.5 389.3 519.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 21

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis
Variable 22

Value Freq
|
1 803 | ****************************************
2 279 | *************
3 103 | *****
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 200.8 401.5 602.3 803.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 22

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 23

Value Freq
|
1 829 | ****************************************
2 228 | ***********
3 128 | ******
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 207.3 414.5 621.8 829.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 23

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 24

Value Freq
|
1 643 | ****************************************
2 329 | ********************
3 213 | *************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 160.8 321.5 482.3 643.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 24

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 25

Value Freq
|
1 712 | ****************************************
2 286 | ****************
3 187 | **********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 178.0 356.0 534.0 712.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 25

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 26

Value Freq
|
1 958 | ****************************************
2 173 | *******
 3 54 | **
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 239.5 479.0 718.5 958.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 26

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 27

Value Freq
|
1 697 | ****************************************
2 382 | *********************
3 106 | ******
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 174.3 348.5 522.8 697.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 27

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 28

Value Freq
|
1 562 | ****************************************
2 336 | ***********************
3 287 | ********************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 140.5 281.0 421.5 562.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 28

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 29

Value Freq
|
1 668 | ****************************************
2 334 | ********************
3 183 | **********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 167.0 334.0 501.0 668.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 29

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 30

Value Freq
|
1 839 | ****************************************
2 215 | **********
3 131 | ******
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 209.8 419.5 629.3 839.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 30

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis
Variable 31

Value Freq
|
1 743 | ****************************************
2 235 | ************
3 207 | ***********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 185.8 371.5 557.3 743.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 31

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 32

Value Freq
|
1 787 | ****************************************
2 268 | *************
3 130 | ******
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 196.8 393.5 590.3 787.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 32

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 33

Value Freq
|
1 634 | ****************************************
2 350 | **********************
3 201 | ************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 158.5 317.0 475.5 634.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 33

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 34

Value Freq
|
1 800 | ****************************************
2 246 | ************
3 139 | ******
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 200.0 400.0 600.0 800.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 34

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 35

Value Freq
|
1 755 | ****************************************
2 293 | ***************
3 137 | *******
 +-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 188.8 377.5 566.3 755.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 35

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 36

Value Freq
|
1 828 | ****************************************
2 243 | ***********
3 114 | *****
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 207.0 414.0 621.0 828.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 36

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 37

Value Freq
|
1 670 | ****************************************
2 354 | *********************
3 161 | *********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 167.5 335.0 502.5 670.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 37

You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MULTIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVES

Analysis of the Mardia's (1970) multivariate asymmetry skewness and kurtosis.

Coefficient Statistic df
P

Skewness 134.220 26508.529 9139

1.0000
SKewness corrected for small sample 134.220 26579.177 9139
1.0000
Kurtosis 1820.834 121.055
0.0000**

** Significant at 0.05

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

STANDARIZED VARIANCE / COVARIANCE MATRIX (POLYCHORIC CORRELATION)

(Polychoric algorithm: Bayes modal estimation; Choi, Kim, Chen, & Dannels, 2011)

Variable 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37
V 1 1.000
V 2 0.825 1.000
V 3 0.713 0.833 1.000
V 4 0.503 0.615 0.614 1.000
V 5 0.578 0.630 0.588 0.612 1.000
V 6 0.344 0.438 0.477 0.538 0.526 1.000
V 7 0.281 0.346 0.370 0.490 0.478 0.789 1.000
V 8 0.319 0.367 0.320 0.371 0.499 0.353 0.399 1.000
V 9 0.522 0.567 0.503 0.480 0.744 0.438 0.392 0.606
1.000
V 10 0.246 0.294 0.313 0.450 0.351 0.373 0.436 0.318
0.385 1.000
V 11 0.290 0.384 0.400 0.487 0.374 0.696 0.646 0.351
0.334 0.544 1.000
V 12 0.210 0.267 0.293 0.444 0.298 0.478 0.504 0.304
0.259 0.544 0.724 1.000
V 13 0.078 0.125 0.144 0.288 0.116 0.248 0.206 0.152
0.120 0.312 0.318 0.336 1.000
V 14 0.369 0.439 0.477 0.590 0.428 0.470 0.462 0.284
0.380 0.448 0.513 0.538 0.479 1.000
V 15 0.594 0.519 0.528 0.357 0.381 0.332 0.331 0.280
0.389 0.225 0.278 0.248 0.195 0.456 1.000
V 16 0.537 0.490 0.521 0.424 0.470 0.317 0.341 0.356
0.421 0.219 0.282 0.227 0.146 0.338 0.590 1.000
V 17 0.573 0.544 0.550 0.401 0.482 0.351 0.383 0.343
0.484 0.269 0.381 0.227 0.221 0.406 0.690 0.633 1.000
V 18 0.448 0.448 0.399 0.395 0.416 0.399 0.383 0.267
0.425 0.280 0.366 0.327 0.258 0.445 0.532 0.450 0.496
1.000
V 19 0.350 0.421 0.388 0.485 0.466 0.476 0.496 0.442
0.421 0.477 0.514 0.471 0.185 0.463 0.412 0.389 0.455
0.435 1.000
V 20 0.249 0.339 0.356 0.474 0.409 0.456 0.403 0.331
0.376 0.370 0.374 0.409 0.319 0.462 0.322 0.314 0.368
0.413 0.578 1.000
V 21 0.226 0.267 0.227 0.396 0.272 0.363 0.387 0.237
0.256 0.327 0.331 0.397 0.320 0.439 0.315 0.163 0.271
0.416 0.461 0.759 1.000
V 22 0.212 0.230 0.188 0.330 0.204 0.212 0.306 0.290
0.181 0.290 0.227 0.305 0.215 0.322 0.317 0.243 0.323
0.316 0.328 0.476 0.493 1.000
V 23 0.360 0.369 0.491 0.368 0.381 0.318 0.353 0.345
0.381 0.308 0.328 0.369 0.177 0.433 0.386 0.393 0.373
0.384 0.383 0.283 0.269 0.316 1.000
V 24 0.366 0.446 0.490 0.465 0.356 0.445 0.423 0.210
0.326 0.288 0.370 0.362 0.209 0.568 0.444 0.358 0.388
0.498 0.370 0.353 0.283 0.197 0.455 1.000
V 25 0.244 0.333 0.370 0.443 0.265 0.438 0.401 0.144
0.233 0.268 0.400 0.390 0.362 0.532 0.369 0.235 0.340
0.380 0.396 0.535 0.541 0.395 0.279 0.520 1.000
V 26 0.208 0.320 0.342 0.376 0.250 0.315 0.329 0.292
0.286 0.318 0.367 0.343 0.407 0.377 0.346 0.294 0.389
0.288 0.486 0.451 0.313 0.286 0.269 0.327 0.371 1.000
V 27 0.372 0.420 0.419 0.539 0.422 0.421 0.426 0.347
0.366 0.503 0.506 0.544 0.380 0.640 0.379 0.279 0.332
0.414 0.591 0.484 0.383 0.310 0.397 0.445 0.455 0.568
1.000
V 28 0.574 0.648 0.657 0.665 0.589 0.445 0.452 0.397
0.526 0.411 0.463 0.475 0.257 0.581 0.453 0.421 0.478
0.527 0.493 0.443 0.351 0.302 0.420 0.566 0.440 0.300
0.527 1.000
V 29 0.307 0.414 0.414 0.551 0.437 0.566 0.532 0.327
0.361 0.437 0.599 0.598 0.397 0.587 0.388 0.322 0.379
0.522 0.598 0.616 0.556 0.462 0.355 0.455 0.659 0.491
0.581 0.612 1.000
V 30 0.503 0.574 0.597 0.603 0.522 0.529 0.479 0.347
0.439 0.395 0.512 0.408 0.260 0.598 0.513 0.456 0.467
0.579 0.538 0.449 0.352 0.303 0.465 0.651 0.544 0.428
0.601 0.696 0.623 1.000
V 31 0.484 0.560 0.590 0.562 0.488 0.530 0.459 0.296
0.443 0.342 0.473 0.409 0.266 0.570 0.463 0.409 0.489
0.504 0.509 0.479 0.376 0.262 0.405 0.693 0.533 0.343
0.568 0.729 0.605 0.734 1.000
V 32 0.404 0.494 0.647 0.532 0.509 0.409 0.387 0.312
0.409 0.329 0.397 0.369 0.184 0.492 0.422 0.335 0.438
0.343 0.370 0.308 0.216 0.219 0.493 0.462 0.349 0.286
0.460 0.582 0.419 0.611 0.549 1.000
V 33 0.350 0.407 0.451 0.556 0.405 0.474 0.440 0.301
0.403 0.330 0.426 0.395 0.325 0.554 0.403 0.296 0.376
0.398 0.409 0.423 0.349 0.313 0.352 0.518 0.528 0.340
0.467 0.564 0.564 0.609 0.621 0.531 1.000
V 34 0.398 0.418 0.467 0.487 0.400 0.429 0.432 0.317
0.403 0.323 0.381 0.351 0.236 0.453 0.423 0.399 0.382
0.376 0.334 0.344 0.280 0.343 0.543 0.463 0.427 0.257
0.413 0.527 0.458 0.571 0.516 0.486 0.728 1.000
V 35 0.389 0.488 0.469 0.544 0.481 0.550 0.525 0.437
0.428 0.452 0.557 0.485 0.318 0.541 0.405 0.383 0.372
0.441 0.574 0.465 0.352 0.346 0.441 0.483 0.435 0.474
0.633 0.606 0.629 0.638 0.620 0.542 0.633 0.616 1.000
V 36 0.564 0.614 0.638 0.472 0.652 0.514 0.398 0.358
0.689 0.322 0.357 0.273 0.073 0.435 0.454 0.471 0.548
0.487 0.472 0.442 0.343 0.238 0.397 0.437 0.374 0.323
0.425 0.564 0.489 0.585 0.560 0.502 0.492 0.460 0.480
1.000
V 37 0.452 0.525 0.592 0.508 0.534 0.456 0.445 0.398
0.488 0.408 0.485 0.386 0.254 0.474 0.416 0.417 0.474
0.453 0.425 0.373 0.274 0.270 0.531 0.550 0.378 0.351
0.531 0.602 0.477 0.773 0.596 0.576 0.529 0.580 0.669
0.561 1.000

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ADEQUACY OF THE POLYCHORIC CORRELATION MATRIX

Determinant of the matrix < 0.000001

Bartlett's statistic = 13479.7 (df = 666; P = 0.000010)
Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) test = 0.92532 (very good)
Bootstrap 95% confidence interval of KMO = ( 0.594 0.898)

NORMED ITEM-MSA INDICES

Items Quartile of Sum Relative difficulty Normed MSA Bootstrap 95%

response scores index Confidence
interval

17 ** 1 0.39212 0.89361 ( 0.394

0.899)
 26 ** 2 0.41238 0.86383 ( 0.377
0.893)
13 ** 2 0.42475 0.83142 ( 0.309
0.857)
18 2 0.42982 0.94855 ( 0.517
0.952)
15 ** 2 0.43263 0.92645 ( 0.495
0.933)
16 ** 2 0.45795 0.91654 ( 0.486
0.922)
3 2 0.45823 0.89731 ( 0.503
0.912)
36 2 0.46582 0.93640 ( 0.646
0.944)
30 2 0.46751 0.91903 ( 0.513
0.930)
23 2 0.46948 0.91686 ( 0.548
0.916)
22 2 0.46976 0.92354 ( 0.516
0.924)
8 2 0.47201 0.92009 ( 0.570
0.918)
34 2 0.48073 0.92940 ( 0.627
0.931)
32 2 0.48186 0.93827 ( 0.533
0.944)
19 3 0.49142 0.95437 ( 0.655
0.954)
35 3 0.49283 0.93544 ( 0.545
0.945)
6 3 0.49648 0.88604 ( 0.544
0.894)
27 3 0.50042 0.93697 ( 0.595
0.942)
31 3 0.51589 0.94813 ( 0.603
0.953)
25 3 0.51899 0.93891 ( 0.551
0.942)
20 3 0.51955 0.90742 ( 0.604
0.910)
2 3 0.52208 0.91950 ( 0.577
0.922)
37 ** 3 0.52349 0.91249 ( 0.495
0.926)
29 3 0.53024 0.96013 ( 0.721
0.959)
1 3 0.53812 0.93289 ( 0.551
0.932)
9 3 0.54008 0.89499 ( 0.568
0.905)
11 3 0.54459 0.91549 ( 0.528
0.920)
33 3 0.54487 0.93763 ( 0.706
0.940)
24 3 0.54571 0.92785 ( 0.629
0.939)
7 3 0.55134 0.91534 ( 0.561
0.922)
14 3 0.57300 0.94450 ( 0.651
0.948)
5 3 0.57918 0.95504 ( 0.721
0.953)
28 4 0.58931 0.95422 ( 0.654
0.958)
21 ** 4 0.59747 0.86328 ( 0.443
0.876)
4 4 0.63572 0.95828 ( 0.670
0.961)
12 ** 4 0.64107 0.91973 ( 0.452
0.928)
10 4 0.65795 0.93984 ( 0.643
0.945)

** Number of items proposed to be removed: 8

Values of MSA below .50 suggest that the item does not measure the same domain as
the remaining items in the pool, and so that it should be removed. At the same
time, for a normal-range test, an optimal pool of items should have a large spread
of Relative difficulty indices, and each quartile should have a similar number of
items. When removing items from the pool, all these aspects should be taken into
account. Sometimes, the conclusion is that new items should be added to the pool
of items.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPLAINED VARIANCE BASED ON EIGENVALUES

Variable Eigenvalue Proportion of Cumulative Proportion

Variance of Variance

1 16.53181 0.44681 0.44681

2 2.75951 0.07458
3 1.60072 0.04326
4 1.57954 0.04269
5 1.15574 0.03124
6 1.09377 0.02956
7 1.04522 0.02825
8 0.88630 0.02395
9 0.83709 0.02262
10 0.76170 0.02059
11 0.67415 0.01822
12 0.60205 0.01627
13 0.56795 0.01535
14 0.53722 0.01452
15 0.52170 0.01410
16 0.51267 0.01386
17 0.48940 0.01323
18 0.47247 0.01277
19 0.41469 0.01121
20 0.37645 0.01017
21 0.37446 0.01012
22 0.32846 0.00888
23 0.31021 0.00838
24 0.28115 0.00760
25 0.27689 0.00748
26 0.25552 0.00691
27 0.23547 0.00636
28 0.22170 0.00599
 29 0.20430 0.00552
30 0.19216 0.00519
31 0.18142 0.00490
32 0.15792 0.00427
33 0.14751 0.00399
34 0.13638 0.00369
35 0.10690 0.00289
36 0.09727 0.00263
37 0.07214 0.00195

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ROBUST GOODNESS OF FIT STATISTICS

Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) = 0.070;

BC Bootstrap 95% confidence interval = ( 0.0658 0.0717)
(between
0.050 and 0.080 : fair)
Estimated Non-Centrality Parameter (NCP) = 1861.840
Degrees of Freedom = 629
Test of Approximate Fit
H0 : RMSEA < 0.05; P = 1.000

Minimum Fit Function Chi Square with 629 degrees of freedom = 5821.756
(P = 0.000010)
Robust Mean and Variance-Adjusted Chi Square with 629 degrees of freedom = 4281.707
(P = 0.000010)
Chi-Square for independence model with 666 degrees of freedom =
152899.486

Non-Normed Fit Index (NNFI; Tucker & Lewis) = 0.975;

BC Bootstrap 95% confidence interval = ( 0.971 0.980)
Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.976;
BC Bootstrap 95% confidence interval = ( 0.973 0.982)
(between
0.950 and 0.990 : close)
Schwarz�s Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) =
4805.442; BC Bootstrap 95% confidence interval = (4375.374 4981.606)

Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) = 0.967;

BC Bootstrap 95% confidence interval = ( 0.963 0.974)
Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) = 0.965;
BC Bootstrap 95% confidence interval = ( 0.961 0.972)
Goodness of Fit Index without diagonal values (GFI) = 0.962;
BC Bootstrap 95% confidence interval = ( 0.957 0.970)
Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index without diagonal values(AGFI) = 0.960;
BC Bootstrap 95% confidence interval = ( 0.954 0.969)

EIGENVALUES OF THE REDUCED CORRELATION MATRIX

Variable Eigenvalue

1 15.996509579
2 2.161327074
3 1.015110474
4 0.966919952
5 0.541570134
6 0.492648715
7 0.475705310
 8 0.313897666
9 0.203709979
10 0.157160271
11 0.124032175
12 0.037471883
13 0.027781082
14 -0.011867882
15 -0.046380055
16 -0.065865243
17 -0.096270766
18 -0.122682893
19 -0.158042861
20 -0.178468661
21 -0.187477372
22 -0.199457851
23 -0.233702283
24 -0.239227421
25 -0.250170053
26 -0.295184951
27 -0.307324495
28 -0.317671344
29 -0.358466527
30 -0.372330752
31 -0.376472575
32 -0.392484031
33 -0.423530089
34 -0.441880815
35 -0.448482516
36 -0.480772175
37 -0.513114287

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

UNROTATED LOADING MATRIX

Variable F 1 Communality

V 1 0.623 0.388
V 2 0.709 0.503
V 3 0.729 0.531
V 4 0.748 0.559
V 5 0.690 0.475
V 6 0.682 0.465
V 7 0.651 0.424
V 8 0.507 0.257
V 9 0.635 0.404
V 10 0.544 0.296
V 11 0.657 0.431
V 12 0.590 0.348
V 13 0.370 0.137
V 14 0.726 0.527
V 15 0.618 0.382
V 16 0.567 0.322
V 17 0.639 0.408
V 18 0.635 0.403
V 19 0.682 0.466
V 20 0.630 0.397
V 21 0.524 0.274
V 22 0.439 0.193
V 23 0.576 0.332
V 24 0.658 0.433
V 25 0.607 0.369
V 26 0.525 0.276
V 27 0.705 0.497
V 28 0.794 0.631
V 29 0.757 0.573
V 30 0.821 0.675
V 31 0.782 0.611
V 32 0.664 0.441
V 33 0.699 0.488
V 34 0.661 0.437
V 35 0.768 0.590
V 36 0.710 0.504
V 37 0.742 0.551

EXPLAINED VARIANCE AND RELIABILITY OF EAP SCORES

Ferrando & Lorenzo-Seva (2016)

Factor Variance EAP Reliability Factor Determinacy Index

1 15.997 0.969 0.984

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BIAS-CORRECTED AND ACCELERATED (BCa) BOOTSTRAP 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR

LOADING VALUES

Variable F 1 BCa Confidence Interval

V 1 0.623 ( 0.569 0.669)

V 2 0.709 ( 0.671 0.751)
V 3 0.729 ( 0.678 0.769)
V 4 0.748 ( 0.715 0.789)
V 5 0.690 ( 0.651 0.724)
V 6 0.682 ( 0.628 0.723)
V 7 0.651 ( 0.603 0.699)
V 8 0.507 ( 0.445 0.567)
V 9 0.635 ( 0.586 0.679)
V 10 0.544 ( 0.482 0.588)
V 11 0.657 ( 0.599 0.693)
V 12 0.590 ( 0.543 0.644)
V 13 0.370 ( 0.298 0.439)
V 14 0.726 ( 0.686 0.762)
V 15 0.618 ( 0.558 0.674)
V 16 0.567 ( 0.510 0.618)
V 17 0.639 ( 0.565 0.707)
V 18 0.635 ( 0.575 0.694)
V 19 0.682 ( 0.630 0.723)
V 20 0.630 ( 0.574 0.681)
V 21 0.524 ( 0.468 0.576)
V 22 0.439 ( 0.369 0.504)
V 23 0.576 ( 0.518 0.631)
V 24 0.658 ( 0.611 0.712)
V 25 0.607 ( 0.556 0.657)
V 26 0.525 ( 0.457 0.593)
V 27 0.705 ( 0.661 0.748)
V 28 0.794 ( 0.764 0.825)
V 29 0.757 ( 0.716 0.785)
V 30 0.821 ( 0.787 0.852)
V 31 0.782 ( 0.747 0.815)
V 32 0.664 ( 0.611 0.709)
V 33 0.699 ( 0.656 0.738)
V 34 0.661 ( 0.606 0.704)
V 35 0.768 ( 0.733 0.804)
V 36 0.710 ( 0.659 0.756)
V 37 0.742 ( 0.704 0.779)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

ITEM RESPONSE THEORY PARAMETERIZATION: NORMAL-OGIVE GRADED RESPONSE MODEL

(GRM, Samejima, 1969)

Item a b 1 b 2 b 3

V 1 0.796 -5.000 0.182 1.594

V 2 1.006 -5.000 0.232 1.577
V 3 1.064 -5.000 0.820 1.762
V 4 1.127 -5.000 -0.499 0.854
V 5 0.952 -5.000 -0.081 1.144
V 6 0.932 -5.000 0.605 1.524
V 7 0.858 -5.000 0.067 1.458
V 8 0.589 -5.000 0.886 2.649
V 9 0.823 -5.000 0.105 1.653
V 10 0.648 -5.000 -0.944 1.084
V 11 0.871 -5.000 0.073 1.560
V 12 0.730 -5.000 -0.854 1.251
V 13 0.398 -5.000 2.282 3.887
V 14 1.056 -5.000 0.007 1.059
V 15 0.786 -5.000 1.226 2.348
V 16 0.689 -5.000 0.888 2.645
V 17 0.830 -5.000 1.733 2.701
V 18 0.821 -5.000 1.229 2.305
V 19 0.933 -5.000 0.514 1.787
V 20 0.811 -5.000 0.302 1.758
V 21 0.615 -5.000 -0.298 1.408
V 22 0.489 -5.000 1.050 3.098
V 23 0.705 -5.000 0.908 2.147
V 24 0.874 -5.000 0.163 1.393
V 25 0.764 -5.000 0.421 1.653
V 26 0.617 -5.000 1.662 3.219
V 27 0.994 -5.000 0.316 1.907
V 28 1.307 -5.000 -0.081 0.880
V 29 1.158 -5.000 0.212 1.345
V 30 1.441 -5.000 0.667 1.490
V 31 1.253 -5.000 0.414 1.197
V 32 0.889 -5.000 0.638 1.848
V 33 0.976 -5.000 0.126 1.368
V 34 0.880 -5.000 0.687 1.799
V 35 1.200 -5.000 0.457 1.558
V 36 1.009 -5.000 0.733 1.835
V 37 1.108 -5.000 0.222 1.481

a: item discrimination
b: category difficulties

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BIAS-CORRECTED BOOTSTRAP 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS FOR ITEM RESPONSE THEORY

PARAMETERIZATION

ITEM DISCRIMINATION

Item Value BCa Confidence Interval

V 1 0.796 ( 0.695 0.902)

V 2 1.006 ( 0.906 1.136)
V 3 1.064 ( 0.924 1.203)
V 4 1.127 ( 1.024 1.283)
V 5 0.952 ( 0.858 1.050)
V 6 0.932 ( 0.806 1.048)
V 7 0.858 ( 0.758 0.982)
V 8 0.589 ( 0.497 0.688)
V 9 0.823 ( 0.723 0.925)
V 10 0.648 ( 0.550 0.729)
V 11 0.871 ( 0.747 0.962)
V 12 0.730 ( 0.646 0.842)
V 13 0.398 ( 0.312 0.489)
V 14 1.056 ( 0.947 1.177)
V 15 0.786 ( 0.672 0.912)
V 16 0.689 ( 0.593 0.785)
V 17 0.830 ( 0.685 0.998)
V 18 0.821 ( 0.703 0.965)
V 19 0.933 ( 0.811 1.046)
V 20 0.811 ( 0.702 0.933)
V 21 0.615 ( 0.529 0.705)
V 22 0.489 ( 0.398 0.584)
V 23 0.705 ( 0.606 0.814)
V 24 0.874 ( 0.773 1.016)
V 25 0.764 ( 0.670 0.872)
V 26 0.617 ( 0.514 0.736)
V 27 0.994 ( 0.881 1.127)
V 28 1.307 ( 1.185 1.462)
V 29 1.158 ( 1.024 1.268)
V 30 1.441 ( 1.276 1.631)
V 31 1.253 ( 1.124 1.406)
V 32 0.889 ( 0.773 1.005)
V 33 0.976 ( 0.870 1.102)
V 34 0.880 ( 0.764 0.990)
V 35 1.200 ( 1.078 1.354)
V 36 1.009 ( 0.879 1.154)
V 37 1.108 ( 0.992 1.243)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 1

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.123)

2 0.182 ( 0.018 1.602)
3 1.594 ( 1.000 3.000)
DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 2

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.345)

2 0.232 ( 0.070 1.567)
3 1.577 ( 0.725
11573515473907531602429541193110382679241370469185467338776757583844159654918942598
790298866227837995991602951194752550276341246467772514304.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 3

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.956)

2 0.820 ( 0.675 1.791)
3 1.762 ( 0.965 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 4

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 -0.408)

2 -0.499 ( -0.656 0.865)
3 0.854 ( 0.000
41966106135800261583164373368169289712698252690116695697576981314000226027083007360
77834542183701435551285279125913183512604478003555964142547517655277369831301733514
58147108520112370690145900278850704475099116945542975952770061405497101985478458508
3094651901714086019826514609524802481472446390075392.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 5

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.080)

2 -0.081 ( -0.235 1.158)
3 1.144 ( 0.604
44735677015241772573150931417375538660815955993571411003188288828695540833191675339
42674362262776960328147404944965045033626089012930902224627181609536777125709190260
02912949592710868652551899560397550690372826284310385738783875210629502571203694046
152723791872.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 6

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.726)

2 0.605 ( 0.436 1.542)
3 1.524 ( 1.000
37779628564788580267926813809205464079703364354749684879462742058413857871757312.00
0)
DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 7

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.218)

2 0.067 ( -0.084 1.459)
3 1.458 ( 1.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 8

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 1.129)

2 0.886 ( 0.652 2.733)
3 2.649 ( 2.649 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 9

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.257)

2 0.105 ( -0.088 1.678)
3 1.653 ( 1.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 10

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 -0.748)

2 -0.944 ( -1.289 1.116)
3 1.084 ( 0.756 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 11

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.216)

2 0.073 ( -0.073 1.601)
3 1.560 ( 1.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 12

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 -0.644)

2 -0.854 ( -1.095 1.291)
3 1.251 ( 0.760 1258.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 13

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 3.173)

 2 2.282 ( 1.699 3.941)
3 3.887 ( 3.887 3.887)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 14

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.115)

2 0.007 ( -0.142 1.064)
3 1.059 ( 1.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 15

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 1.454)

2 1.226 ( 1.015 2.328)
3 2.348 ( 3.000
37779628564788580267926813809205464079703364354749684879462742058413857871757312.00
0)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 16

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 1.071)

2 0.888 ( 0.643 2.664)
3 2.645 ( 2.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 17

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 2.119)

2 1.733 ( 1.448 2.763)
3 2.701 ( 3.000 3.500)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 18

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 1.446)

2 1.229 ( 0.915 2.380)
3 2.305 ( 3.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 19

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.661)

2 0.514 ( 0.347 1.801)
3 1.787 ( 1.000
83916961637792966039294934786227029377066783486345704198586904561050408637934899620
09722424796851074899977292481835733101151056881709220953637283591858349613010755813
818387321825784022820017950121402472807013288593957806405164126534929739677696000.0
00)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 20

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.461)

2 0.302 ( 0.081 1.804)
3 1.758 ( 1.000 3.219)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 21

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 -0.121)

2 -0.298 ( -0.513 1.456)
3 1.408 ( 1.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 22

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 1.383)

2 1.050 ( 0.785 3.209)
3 3.098 ( 3.500
30134527394038172965371030456643711623711816384829349430784790025088286619791651444
96502294223483737305486190783333991751003507854667983194458687606339038161826027327
28423494410531503796757008354161990718980096.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 23

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 1.175)

2 0.908 ( 0.716 2.202)
3 2.147 ( 3.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 24

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.297)

2 0.163 ( 0.020 1.413)
3 1.393 ( 1.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 25

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.571)

2 0.421 ( 0.268 1.680)
 3 1.653 ( 1.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 26

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 2.168)

2 1.662 ( 1.327 3.276)
3 3.219 ( 3.500 61782.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 27

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.462)

2 0.316 ( 0.139 1.926)
3 1.907 ( 1.000
37779628564788580267926813809205464079703364354749684879462742058413857871757312.00
0)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 28

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.012)

2 -0.081 ( -0.257 0.868)
3 0.880 ( 0.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 29

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.323)

2 0.212 ( 0.082 1.369)
3 1.345 ( 1.000 157346588958287032342159458391224745984.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 30

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.757)

2 0.667 ( 0.538 1.491)
3 1.490 ( 1.000
41966106135800261583164373368169289712698252690116695697576981314000226027083007360
77834542183701435551285279125913183512604478003555964142547517655277369831301733514
58147108520112370690145900278850704475099116945542975952770061405497101985478458508
3094651901714086019826514609524802481472446390075392.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 31

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.526)

 2 0.414 ( 0.307 1.192)
3 1.197 ( 0.742 3.500)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 32

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.801)

2 0.638 ( 0.498 1.850)
3 1.848 ( 1.000 3.887)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 33

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.257)

2 0.126 ( -0.020 1.388)
3 1.368 ( 1.000
83916961637792966039294934786227029377066783486345704198586904561050408637934899620
09722424796851074899977292481835733101151056881709220953637283591858349613010755813
818387321825784022820017950121402472807013288593957806405164126534929739677696000.0
00)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 34

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.832)

2 0.687 ( 0.511 1.836)
3 1.799 ( 1.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 35

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.586)

2 0.457 ( 0.337 1.556)
3 1.558 ( 1.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 36

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.854)

2 0.733 ( 0.568 1.853)
3 1.835 ( 1.000 3.000)

DIFFICULTIES OF ITEM: V 37

b Value BC Confidence Interval

1 -5.000 ( -5.000 0.336)

2 0.222 ( 0.076 1.507)
 3 1.481 ( 1.000 3.000)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DISTRIBUTION OF RESIDUALS

Number of Residuals = 666

Summary Statistics for Fitted Residuals

Smallest Fitted Residual = -0.1901

Median Fitted Residual = -0.0097
Largest Fitted Residual = 0.4286
Mean Fitted Residual = 0.0003
Variance Fitted Residual = 0.0074

Root Mean Square of Residuals (RMSR) = 0.0859

BC Bootstrap 95% confidence interval of RMSR = ( 0.081 0.088)
Expected mean value of RMSR for an acceptable model = 0.0291 (Kelley's criterion)
(Kelley, 1935,page 13; see also Harman, 1962, page 21 of the 2nd edition)

Note: if the value of RMSR is much larger than Kelley's criterion value the model
cannot be considered as good

Weighted Root Mean Square Residual (WRMR) = 0.0838 (values under 1.0
have been recommended to represent good fit; Yu & Muthen, 2002)
BC Bootstrap 95% confidence interval of WRMR = ( 0.079 0.086)

Histogram for fitted residuals

Value Freq
|
-0.1901 3 |
-0.1282 57 | **********
-0.0663 180 | ********************************
-0.0045 222 | ****************************************
0.0574 117 | *********************
0.1193 52 | *********
0.1812 16 | **
0.2430 11 | *
0.3049 4 |
0.3668 3 |
0.4286 1 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 55.5 111.0 166.5 222.0

Summary Statistics for Standardized Residuals

Smallest Standardized Residual = -6.54

Median Standardized Residual = -0.33
Largest Standardized Residual = 14.75
Mean Standardized Residual = 0.01

Stemleaf Plot for Standardized Residuals

-6 | 5
 -5 | 6643322220
-4 | 987776655433222111110000000
-3 | 98888777776666554444443322221111111110
-2 |
99999999999988888888888877777777666666655555555544444333333333322222222222111111110
000000000
-1 |
99999999888888888887777777777776666666666655555555555444444444333333332222222211111
1111111111000000000
-0 |
99999999988888888777777777666666666666655555555554444444444433333333333322222222222
22111111111111111
0 |
00000000111111111111111112222222222222233333333444444444555555556666677777777778888
88899999999
1 | 000000000001111222222222333333333444444555555666666666677888888888888999
2 | 0000112333333334444456666777778888899999
3 | 0001111111222333456666777888888
4 | 001111112233444457889
5 | 1112256666
6 | 0134899
7 | 223577
8 | 2259
9 | 1238
10 | 259
11 | 69
12 |
13 | 2
14 | 7

Largest Negative Standardized Residuals

Residual for Var 6 and Var 1 -2.77

Residual for Var 7 and Var 1 -4.29
Residual for Var 10 and Var 1 -3.19
Residual for Var 11 and Var 1 -4.08
Residual for Var 12 and Var 1 -5.42
Residual for Var 13 and Var 1 -5.25
Residual for Var 14 and Var 1 -2.86
Residual for Var 19 and Var 1 -2.59
Residual for Var 20 and Var 1 -4.93
Residual for Var 21 and Var 1 -3.44
Residual for Var 25 and Var 1 -4.63
Residual for Var 26 and Var 1 -4.11
Residual for Var 29 and Var 1 -5.64
Residual for Var 33 and Var 1 -2.93
Residual for Var 35 and Var 1 -3.09
Residual for Var 7 and Var 2 -3.98
Residual for Var 10 and Var 2 -3.14
Residual for Var 11 and Var 2 -2.83
Residual for Var 12 and Var 2 -5.19
Residual for Var 13 and Var 2 -4.74
Residual for Var 14 and Var 2 -2.62
Residual for Var 20 and Var 2 -3.71
Residual for Var 21 and Var 2 -3.59
Residual for Var 22 and Var 2 -2.82
Residual for Var 25 and Var 2 -3.37
Residual for Var 27 and Var 2 -2.75
Residual for Var 29 and Var 2 -4.23
Residual for Var 33 and Var 2 -3.06
Residual for Var 7 and Var 3 -3.61
Residual for Var 10 and Var 3 -2.85
Residual for Var 11 and Var 3 -2.68
Residual for Var 12 and Var 3 -4.71
Residual for Var 13 and Var 3 -4.34
Residual for Var 19 and Var 3 -3.77
Residual for Var 20 and Var 3 -3.54
Residual for Var 21 and Var 3 -5.32
Residual for Var 22 and Var 3 -4.53
Residual for Var 27 and Var 3 -3.26
Residual for Var 29 and Var 3 -4.72
Residual for Var 35 and Var 3 -3.13
Residual for Var 15 and Var 4 -3.62
Residual for Var 17 and Var 4 -2.64
Residual for Var 18 and Var 4 -2.75
Residual for Var 11 and Var 5 -2.70
Residual for Var 12 and Var 5 -3.74
Residual for Var 13 and Var 5 -4.80
Residual for Var 21 and Var 5 -3.07
Residual for Var 22 and Var 5 -3.39
Residual for Var 24 and Var 5 -3.37
Residual for Var 25 and Var 5 -5.27
Residual for Var 26 and Var 5 -3.86
Residual for Var 29 and Var 5 -2.91
Residual for Var 33 and Var 5 -2.63
Residual for Var 15 and Var 6 -3.07
Residual for Var 17 and Var 6 -2.90
Residual for Var 22 and Var 6 -3.00
Residual for Var 23 and Var 6 -2.58
Residual for Var 28 and Var 6 -3.31
Residual for Var 14 and Var 8 -2.89
Residual for Var 24 and Var 8 -4.25
Residual for Var 25 and Var 8 -5.63
Residual for Var 31 and Var 8 -3.48
Residual for Var 11 and Var 9 -2.86
Residual for Var 12 and Var 9 -3.99
Residual for Var 13 and Var 9 -3.96
Residual for Var 14 and Var 9 -2.78
Residual for Var 21 and Var 9 -2.66
Residual for Var 22 and Var 9 -3.37
Residual for Var 24 and Var 9 -3.16
Residual for Var 25 and Var 9 -5.24
Residual for Var 27 and Var 9 -2.81
Residual for Var 29 and Var 9 -4.14
Residual for Var 30 and Var 9 -2.86
Residual for Var 15 and Var 10 -3.82
Residual for Var 16 and Var 10 -3.10
Residual for Var 17 and Var 10 -2.69
Residual for Var 31 and Var 10 -2.88
Residual for Var 15 and Var 11 -4.39
Residual for Var 16 and Var 11 -3.13
Residual for Var 36 and Var 11 -3.75
Residual for Var 15 and Var 12 -4.02
Residual for Var 16 and Var 12 -3.70
Residual for Var 17 and Var 12 -5.16
Residual for Var 30 and Var 12 -2.62
Residual for Var 36 and Var 12 -5.01
Residual for Var 36 and Var 13 -6.54
Residual for Var 16 and Var 14 -2.53
Residual for Var 36 and Var 14 -2.77
Residual for Var 29 and Var 15 -2.74
Residual for Var 21 and Var 16 -4.61
Residual for Var 25 and Var 16 -3.77
Residual for Var 27 and Var 16 -4.15
Residual for Var 29 and Var 16 -3.71
Residual for Var 33 and Var 16 -3.44
Residual for Var 27 and Var 17 -4.08
Residual for Var 29 and Var 17 -3.59
Residual for Var 35 and Var 17 -4.10
Residual for Var 32 and Var 18 -2.72
Residual for Var 24 and Var 19 -2.70
Residual for Var 32 and Var 19 -2.88
Residual for Var 34 and Var 19 -4.03
Residual for Var 37 and Var 19 -2.82
Residual for Var 23 and Var 20 -2.75
Residual for Var 32 and Var 20 -3.81
Residual for Var 37 and Var 20 -3.24
Residual for Var 30 and Var 21 -2.68
Residual for Var 32 and Var 21 -4.54
Residual for Var 37 and Var 21 -3.96
Residual for Var 24 and Var 22 -3.15
Residual for Var 31 and Var 22 -2.79
Residual for Var 32 and Var 22 -2.50
Residual for Var 36 and Var 22 -2.54
Residual for Var 29 and Var 23 -2.80
Residual for Var 37 and Var 25 -2.51
Residual for Var 28 and Var 26 -4.03
Residual for Var 34 and Var 26 -3.09
Residual for Var 36 and Var 27 -2.61
Residual for Var 32 and Var 29 -2.87
Residual for Var 37 and Var 29 -2.92

Largest Positive Standardized Residuals

Residual for Var 2 and Var 1 13.18

Residual for Var 3 and Var 1 8.91
Residual for Var 5 and Var 1 5.09
Residual for Var 9 and Var 1 4.34
Residual for Var 15 and Var 1 7.18
Residual for Var 16 and Var 1 6.32
Residual for Var 17 and Var 1 6.03
Residual for Var 28 and Var 1 2.72
Residual for Var 36 and Var 1 4.20
Residual for Var 3 and Var 2 10.90
Residual for Var 4 and Var 2 2.89
Residual for Var 5 and Var 2 4.85
Residual for Var 9 and Var 2 4.01
Residual for Var 15 and Var 2 2.78
Residual for Var 16 and Var 2 3.00
Residual for Var 17 and Var 2 3.12
Residual for Var 28 and Var 2 2.92
Residual for Var 36 and Var 2 3.78
Residual for Var 5 and Var 3 2.93
Residual for Var 15 and Var 3 2.68
Residual for Var 16 and Var 3 3.71
Residual for Var 17 and Var 3 2.91
Residual for Var 28 and Var 3 2.69
Residual for Var 32 and Var 3 5.60
Residual for Var 36 and Var 3 4.14
Residual for Var 5 and Var 4 3.32
Residual for Var 8 and Var 5 5.13
Residual for Var 9 and Var 5 10.51
Residual for Var 16 and Var 5 2.70
Residual for Var 36 and Var 5 5.60
Residual for Var 7 and Var 6 11.87
Residual for Var 11 and Var 6 8.54
Residual for Var 12 and Var 6 2.62
Residual for Var 10 and Var 7 2.82
Residual for Var 11 and Var 7 7.50
Residual for Var 12 and Var 7 4.12
Residual for Var 9 and Var 8 9.76
Residual for Var 19 and Var 8 3.29
Residual for Var 17 and Var 9 2.70
Residual for Var 36 and Var 9 8.18
Residual for Var 11 and Var 10 6.43
Residual for Var 12 and Var 10 7.69
Residual for Var 13 and Var 10 3.79
Residual for Var 19 and Var 10 3.63
Residual for Var 27 and Var 10 4.11
Residual for Var 12 and Var 11 11.60
Residual for Var 13 and Var 11 2.59
Residual for Var 29 and Var 11 3.51
Residual for Var 13 and Var 12 4.05
Residual for Var 14 and Var 12 3.79
Residual for Var 21 and Var 12 3.02
Residual for Var 27 and Var 12 4.41
Residual for Var 29 and Var 12 5.22
Residual for Var 14 and Var 13 7.25
Residual for Var 20 and Var 13 2.96
Residual for Var 21 and Var 13 4.33
Residual for Var 25 and Var 13 4.71
Residual for Var 26 and Var 13 7.31
Residual for Var 27 and Var 13 4.08
Residual for Var 29 and Var 13 4.01
Residual for Var 24 and Var 14 3.13
Residual for Var 25 and Var 14 3.14
Residual for Var 27 and Var 14 4.41
Residual for Var 16 and Var 15 8.23
Residual for Var 17 and Var 15 10.18
Residual for Var 18 and Var 15 4.81
Residual for Var 17 and Var 16 9.29
Residual for Var 18 and Var 16 3.11
Residual for Var 18 and Var 17 3.10
Residual for Var 36 and Var 17 3.23
Residual for Var 21 and Var 18 2.86
Residual for Var 24 and Var 18 2.77
Residual for Var 20 and Var 19 5.10
Residual for Var 21 and Var 19 3.57
Residual for Var 26 and Var 19 4.41
Residual for Var 27 and Var 19 3.78
Residual for Var 29 and Var 19 2.81
Residual for Var 21 and Var 20 14.75
Residual for Var 22 and Var 20 6.88
Residual for Var 25 and Var 20 5.24
Residual for Var 26 and Var 20 4.15
Residual for Var 29 and Var 20 4.81
Residual for Var 22 and Var 21 9.07
Residual for Var 25 and Var 21 7.68
Residual for Var 29 and Var 21 5.48
Residual for Var 25 and Var 22 4.42
Residual for Var 29 and Var 22 4.45
Residual for Var 24 and Var 23 2.61
Residual for Var 32 and Var 23 3.78
Residual for Var 34 and Var 23 5.59
Residual for Var 37 and Var 23 3.56
Residual for Var 25 and Var 24 4.15
Residual for Var 30 and Var 24 3.81
Residual for Var 31 and Var 24 6.15
Residual for Var 29 and Var 25 6.87
Residual for Var 33 and Var 25 3.58
Residual for Var 27 and Var 26 6.80
Residual for Var 29 and Var 26 3.24
Residual for Var 35 and Var 27 3.14
Residual for Var 31 and Var 28 3.71
Residual for Var 31 and Var 30 3.16
Residual for Var 37 and Var 30 5.62
Residual for Var 33 and Var 31 2.56
Residual for Var 37 and Var 32 2.83
Residual for Var 34 and Var 33 9.16
Residual for Var 35 and Var 33 3.30
Residual for Var 35 and Var 34 3.74
Residual for Var 37 and Var 34 3.07
Residual for Var 37 and Var 35 3.40

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DESCRIPTIVES RELATED TO MISSING DATA

Missing value code : 999

No missing data was observed in your data

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

References

Asparouhov, T., & Muthen, B. (2010). Simple second order chi-square correction.
Unpublished manuscript. Available at
https://www.statmodel.com/download/WLSMV_new_chi21.pdf.

Harman, H. H. (1962). Modern Factor Analysis, 2nd Edition. University of Chicago

Press, Chicago.

Kelley, T. L. (1935). Essential Traits of Mental Life, Harvard Studies in

Education, vol. 26. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

Lambert, Z.V., Wildt, A.R., & Durand, R.M. (1991). Approximating confidence
intervals for factor loadings. Multivariate behavioral research, 26(3), 421 - 434.
doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2603_3

Lorenzo-Seva (2021). SOLOMON: a method for splitting a sample into equivalent

subsamples in factor analysis. Technical report. Universitat Rovira i Virgili,
Tarragona.
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P.J. (2019b). Robust Promin: a method for diagonally
weighted factor rotation. LIBERABIT, Revista Peruana de Psicología, 25, 99-106.
doi:10.24265/liberabit.2019.v25n1.08

Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Van Ginkel, J. R. (2016). Multiple Imputation of missing values
in exploratory factor analysis of multidimensional scales: estimating latent trait
scores. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology, 32(2), 596-608.
doi:10.6018/analesps.32.2.215161

McDonald, R.P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.

Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewnees and kurtosis with

applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530. doi:10.2307/2334770

Olsson, U. (1979a). Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation

coefficient. Psychometrika, 44, 443-460. doi:10.1007/bf02296207

Olsson, U. (1979b). On the robustness of factor analysis against crude

classification of the observations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 14, 485-500.
doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr1404_7

Mislevy, R.J., & Bock, R.D. (1990). BILOG 3 Item analysis and test scoring with
binary logistic models. Mooresville: Scientific Software.

Samejima F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded

scores. Psychometric Monograph, No. 17. doi:10.1007/bf03372160

Ten Berge, J.M.F., Snijders, T.A.B. & Zegers, F.E. (1981). Computational aspects of
the greatest lower bound to reliability and constrained minimum trace factor
analysis. Psychometrika, 46, 201-213. doi:10.1007/bf02293900

Ten Berge, J.M.F., & Socan, G. (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability
of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69, 613-625.
doi:10.1007/bf02289858

Woodhouse, B. & Jackson, P.H. (1977). Lower bounds to the reliability of the total
score on a test composed of nonhomogeneous items: II. A search procedure to locate
the greatest lower bound. Psychometrika, 42, 579-591. doi:10.1007/bf02295980

Yu, C., & Muthen, B. (2002, April). Evaluation of model fit indices for latent
variable models with categorical and continuous outcomes. Paper presented at the
annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, L.A.

FACTOR is based on CLAPACK.

Anderson, E., Bai, Z., Bischof, C., Blackford, S., Demmel, J., Dongarra, J., Du
Croz, J., Greenbaum, A., Hammarling, S., McKenney, A., & Sorensen, D. (1999).
LAPACK Users' Guide. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. Philadelphia,
PA

FACTOR can be refered as:

Ferrando, P.J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2017). Program FACTOR at 10: origins,
development and future directions. Psicothema, 29(2), 236-241. doi:
10.7334/psicothema2016.304
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P.J. (2013). FACTOR 9.2 A comprehensive program for
fitting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Applied
Psychological Measurement, 37(6), 497-498. doi:10.1177/0146621613487794
 Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P.J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the
exploratory factor analysis model. Behavioral Research Methods, 38(1), 88-91.
10.3758/bf03192753

For further information and new releases go to:

psico.fcep.urv.cat/utilitats/factor

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FACTOR completed

Computing time : 10.95 minutes.

Matrices generated : 5155845

Our last advice: Distrust 5% of statistics, and 95% of statisticians. (Cal

desconfiar un 5% de l'estadistica, i un 95% de l'estadistic.)