Final Needs Assesment Report
Final Needs Assesment Report
M arch 20 0 9
2
Rapid Needs Assessment
of the NGO Sector to Respond to
Repercussions of Israel’s Offensive
on the Gaza Strip
M arch 20 09
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary 3
Overview 4
1. Background 7
3. Methodology 8
4. Principal Findings 8
6. Main Conclusions 16
Annexes
2
Executive Summary
O n March 3 and 4, the NGO Development Center (NDC) held a rapid needs assessment workshop
for Palestinian NGOs working in the sectors of Health and rehabilitation, Agriculture, Social Services and
Education. It is important to note that this was the first needs assessment for and by local Palestinian NGOs.
The mechanism applied focused on sector working groups and included the following points of discussion:
role o f NGOs in service delivery, preparedness of NGOs in the current situation, capacity and capability of
NGOs to absorb additional funding and to implement additional programs, the need of each sector by priority,
immediate and intermediate interventions with an emphasis on quick start, and the possibilities of cooperation
and coordination. Forty-seven NGO representatives participated in this rapid needs assessment either through
focus groups, interviews, or case studies.
The preliminary findings of the rapid needs assessment conducted by NDC indicate that Palestinian NGOs
in Gaza face new and additional challenges as a result of Israel’s 22 day military offensive which began on
December 27, 2008. The vast majority of NGOs indicated the unstable political situation, Israeli occupation
and its manifestations, continue to be the main detriment to their work. NGO participants stressed the need
for continued advocacy initiatives on various tracks to end the Israeli occupation. NGOs also stressed the need
for unity among Palestinian parties, coordination of efforts among all actors and the importance of finding exit
strategies and working in the context of both immediate needs and long term development.
3
Overview
I t is imperative to take a step back and civil police officers, most of whom were killed on the
look at the situation in the Gaza Strip prior to first day of the bombing when they were graduating
Israel’s 22 day military offensive which began from a training course. More than 2,400 houses
on December 27, 2008. Notwithstanding were completely destroyed, as were 28 public
Israel’s unilateral disengagement of Gaza in civilian facilities, (including ministries, municipalities,
2005, the fact that Gaza remains an occupied governorates, fishing harbours and the Palestinian
territory means that Israel’s actions towards Legislative Council building), 29 educational
the people and territory must be measured institutions, 30 mosques, 10 charitable societies, 60
against standards of international humanitarian police stations and 121 industrial and commercial
law and Israel must be held accountable for workshops2.
these violations. On September 19, 2007,
Israel’s Security Cabinet declared Gaza to be Evidence is also emerging of the use of illegal
“hostile territory.” Following this declaration, weapons, with reports and pictures showing
Israel cut fuel and electricity supplies to the phosphorous shells spreading tentacles of thick
Gaza Strip and dramatically decreased the white smoke to cover the Israeli troops’ advance
number of humanitarian aid and commercial into Gaza’s neighbourhoods. Phosphorus burning
imports. During the week of 26 November – 2 through the air causes severe injuries and burns
December, 2008, only 66 truckloads (of which to anyone caught underneath, as many of us have
24 trucks were from humanitarian agencies) witnessed through local, Arab, and international
were allowed entry into Gaza, constituting an media coverage. According to Donatella Rivera, head
average of only 11 truckloads per day – down of an Amnesty International investigation team in
from a daily average of 123 trucks per day in Gaza, “We know that white phosphorous munitions
October 2008 and 475 per day in May 20071, in were used in built-up civilian areas, although the
clear violation of the Agreement on Movement Israeli authorities previously denied this. Now we
and Access (AMA) of 2005. have irrefutable evidence of the use of this weapon,
but the doctors who treated the first casualties did
Now that the smoke has temporarily settled not know what had caused their injuries”.3
from Gaza’s skies, local and international
human rights organizations began reporting
about the utter devastation that took place
throughout the course of Israel’s 22 day
assault. According to statistics by the Gaza-
based Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, at
least 1,285 Palestinians were killed, of which
895 were civilians, including 280 children and
111 women. Another 167 of the dead were
1
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Protection of Civilians Weekly Report – 288, 26 November – 02 December
2008.
2
Palestinian Center for Human Rights, Weekly Report: On Israeli Human Rights Violations in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, No. 03/2009, 15 – 21
January 2009 http://www.pchrgaza.org/files/W_report/English/2008/22-01-2009.htm
3
Israel Must Disclose Weapons Used in Gaza, Amnesty International, 26 January 2009 http://www.amnesty.org/en/news-and-updates/news/
israel-must-disclose-weapons-used-gaza-20090126
4
In a recent assessment conducted by the UNDP/PAPP which assessed attitudes and perceptions of Gazan’s
in the aftermath of Israel’s military operations, the study found that, more than one third of household
surveyed, 37% faced illness of health problems. This was more that case in extremely poor (42%) and poor
(39%) households than in households with an average monthly income above the poverty line (28%).
There was a higher frequency of health problems in household in refugee camps (40%) than in those in
cities (34%) and villages (34%). Furthermore, 37% of household were indeed of primary health care and
more than one fourth of these households could not access these services. Of those needing medical care,
including primary health care, 72% faced problems, as only a mere 18% had health care provided to them
without delays or restrictions. Moreover, of the respondents, 11% reported that someone in their family
had been injured and 8% reported a death in the family during the recent Israeli militarily incursions.
The latest Israeli attacks on the Gaza Strip have led to extensive damage to the local infrastructure
including the razing of thousands of agricultural areas as well as tress and green houses, roads, water
wells and network facilities, agricultural lands including smallholder farms. The military operation resulted
in widespread razing of cultivated lands (18%), as well as destruction of greenhouses, livestock (8%) and
poultry farms, registered groundwater wells (13%), irrigation networks and other productive agricultural
assets.4 As Palestinians are mainly an agricultural producing society, the rehabilitation of the agricultural
sector, of which more than 70% has been destroyed by Israel, is of utmost importance among the
immediate needs for the reconstruction and rehabilitation of the Gaza Strip.
The UNDP assessment found that the income poverty rate in the Gaza Strip is 65%. In real numbers, this
means that out of the estimated 1,416,543 Palestinians in the Gaza Strip, approximately 920,750 live in
poverty. Of those 524,120 are extremely poor. 72% of families, affecting about 1,019,910 people do not
have any alternative ways to face financial hardship, let alone pull themselves out of poverty.5
4
Press Release, Gazans Cite Psychological Toll, Unemployment as Major Concerns, According to a UNDP Survey; Agriculture and Private Sector Incur
Massive Damages UN Report, United Nations Development program/Program of Assistance to the Palestinian People, February 9, 2009.
5
United Nations Development Program/Program of Assistance to the Palestinian People (UNDP/PAPP), Inside Gaza: Attitudes and perceptions of the
Gaza Strip residents in the aftermath of the Israeli military operations, February 2008.
5
MAP 1 (Gaza Population Density)
1. Background
T he NGO Development Center (NDC) is an innovative Palestinian non-profit organization that empowers
Palestinian NGOs to better provide vital services to Palestinians living in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, especially
the poor and marginalized. Conceived in partnership with leading Palestinian NGOs, unions and networks, NDC
mobilizes donor funding to deliver a unique combination of direct grants and capacity building programs that
enhance the effectiveness, self reliance and sustainability of Palestinian NGOs. NDC advocates greater NGO
transparency and accountability through the adoption of professional financial and management practices,
and promotes sector-wide coordination and sharing of best practice experiences within its programs and on its
Masader portal (www.masader.ps).
NDC has conducted a two day rapid needs assessment workshop for NGOs working in specific areas in the
Gaza Strip. This assessment will be NDC’s reference point for future interventions especially in the wake of the
Israeli offensive on the Gaza Strip (between 27 Dec-23 Jan 2009), and its impact on the humanitarian, social, and
health situation in Gaza.
7
3. Methodology
The rapid needs assesment process invloved condcuting a two-day focus group workshop attended
by representatives of forty seven NGOs working in the sectors of health and rehabilitation, agriculture,
psycho-social and education. The facilitator used a multi-methodological and dynamic learning-oriented
assessment approach and was assisted closely by NDC team in Gaza. The approach was flexible and used
primary and secondary sources of data collection, based on triangulation, cross checking and validation
with the view to conclude objective and evidence-based assessment information and conclusions. The
information was collected via semi-structured interviews of six community activists; focus groups, field
observation for a number of NGOs; and literature review of NDC and other NGOs.
Participating NGOs discussed the main assessment issues, as mentioned above, provided their feedback
and recommendation on how to improve, strengthen and enhance areas in need of development in
addition to highlighting lessons learnt from their own experiences. To this end, the facilitator analysed the
gathered data and reflected NGOs needs, roles, concerns and recommendations into the development
of this report.
4. Principle Findings
The principal findings of the study are analysed according to the main assessment issues discussed during
the two-day workshop and summarised with the aim to triangulate from different points of view of NGOs,
community activists, and literature review. Each one of these statements adds an idiosyncratic element to
the conclusion.
8
6. The role of NGOs working in education is complimentary to government-run schools. NGOs have
contributed significantly to the education sector via establishing data bases, conducting research,
advancing new educational approaches and tools, targeting children with learning difficulties and
integrating these children into the formal school system, and training teachers working in government
administered schools.
7. NGOs working in the youth sector share responsibility with governmental institutions in youth
development via providing psychosocial, recreational, cultural and sport activities, youth civic
engagement and promoting small-scale income generating initiatives. These NGOs have substituted
the role of government institutions in regards to human rights and civic engagement.
8. NGOs working in the agricultural sector have played a major role in agricultural development.
However, these NGOs are fragmented whereby the sector is affected by the Palestinian political divide
and a lack of an integrated comprehensive development plan and institutional arrangements.
9. NGOs should give more attention to advocacy, mainly in areas such as the siege on Gaza Strip,
occupation and buffer zones.
10. The repercussions of the Israeli offensive were greater than the operational capacity of NGOs in the
Gaza Strip.
11. NGOs work is immensely affected by the siege and closure of borders, shortage of materials and
equipment, creation of buffer zones, inadequate funding, internal political divide, inadequate
integrated planning and coordination and partnership among NGOs and governmental institutions.
II: Repercussions of the Israeli offensive on the NGO sector and community
1. The state of health organizations and the health sector was critical prior to the offensive on Gaza
Strip and has been further exacerbated by the Israeli military offensive due to the damage incurred to
health centres, increased demands on services, and shortage of medical supplies and equipment.
2. There is an increasing demand on rehabilitation services and other community services. For example
there are an additional 800 citizens with various types of physical disabilities who require urgent
psychological, medical and social (humanitarian protection) assistance.
3. Women-based NGOs lack the adequate capacity to address the repercussions of the Israeli offensive.
Women-based NGOs lack emergency plans, adequate human and financial resources, relief responses
and ability to reach the damaged areas.
4. There are direct material damages to a number of NGOs.
5. Youth organizations continue to work on youth development issues such as education and awareness,
culture and research. However, their needs have increased due to the military offensive on Gaza.
6. There is an increased uncertainty among NGOs due to: lack of funding, political context, and control on
NGOs by government, political affiliation of NGOs and affordability of NGOs to meet the community’s
fast-growing needs.
7. NGOs lack in willingness to intervene in ending the internal political divide.
8. Community needs have been exacerbated, specifically in the area of psychosocial support. However,
NGOs response to these needs is weak due to inadequate resources (human, equipment, tools, office
space, and financial) and inadequate professional capacity in emergency planning and decision
making.
9
III: Expected roles for NGOs in the reconstruction phase
NGOs expressed the need for the following actions that would contribute to preparedness, adequate
capacity for implementation and the ability to absorb additional funding to expand programs:
1. Work in areas/fields not covered by the Ministry of Health such as rehabilitation, health education
and awareness, emergency services and psychosocial support.
2. Rehabilitation of persons with disabilities and their families. Additional home care teams have
been employed to respond to the growing needs resulting from the military offensive
3. Participate in women-based research, identification of needs and priorities and orientation of
the reconstruction phase with emphasis on the human factor.
4. Conduct research to characterize determinants of the education system in the post-war phase,
identification of needs and priorities and formulation of a vision and development plan.
5. Participate in formulating a comprehensive vision and plan for the agricultural sector. NGOs
should also focus on providing psycho-social support to farmers’ families.
6. Oversee the reconstruction process to ensure good governance and transparency.
7. Youth will be engaged via reflecting their needs, participation in the implementation and
benefiting from the reconstruction process.
8. Participate effectively in data collection and information, identification of needs and priorities,
contribute to the development of reconstruction plans, institutional arrangements, monitoring
and evaluation and establishing mechanisms to guarantee transparency and accountability.
9. Document war crimes and human rights violations.
10. Professional development of NGOs in order to improve the quality of services provided to target
groups.
11. Lobby and advocacy activities to influence Palestinian laws, policies and strategies related to
target groups. Highlight the Israeli occupation in the Gaza Strip including the buffer security
zones.
12. Empower Palestinians to be able to demand their rights.
13. Continue in service delivery to the community.
14. Position the human factor at the centre of the development process.
15. Restore Palestinian political and social fabric through lobbying and advocacy efforts aimed at
Palestinian unity and ending internal divide.
In order to commence implementing the above mentioned actions, the following should be done:
10
Representatives of Health, Community Rehabilitation and Agriculture NGOs
11
NGOs Working Group for Health Sector
2. Agriculture
1. Rehabilitation and reconstruction of destroyed agricultural land, water cisterns, water pools,
roads, nurseries, green houses; smallholder farms, irrigation networks and agricultural wells.
2. Provision of agricultural materials and assets including pesticides, fertilizers and seedlings.
3. Provision of portable water tanks for farmers’ families.
4. Immediate maintenance of chicken farms.
5. Improvement of the livestock sector and support the local livestock industry.
6. Maintenance of fishing boats and provision of materials and tools to fishermen.
7. Employment opportunities for farmers whose agriculture lands were destroyed.
8. Immediate psycho-social and financial support to farmers and their families.
9. Provision of micro-finance and loan programs for agricultural investment.
10. Formulation of a comprehensive vision, plan, definition of stakeholders’ roles based on an
organizational capacity assessment, and establishing a monitoring and evaluation system.
11. Establishment of bio-agriculture laboratories, agricultural training centres, and veterinary
medicine service centres.
12. Establishing observation sites and horticulture farms in Al-Mawasi zone
13. Postgraduate studies in specific agriculture specializations.
14. Implementing agriculture projects in buffer zones.
12
3. Education
1. Rebuilding and reconstruction of destroyed and damaged schools and universities.
2. Provision of assistance in tuition for all students.
3. Making available basic education tools and essentials such as, text books, desks and laboratories,
etc…
4. Socio-economic support for children and their families (schoolbags, stationary, transportation,
etc…).
5. Supportive education centres and remedial education programs within and outside the formal school
system.
6. Inclusion of children with disabilities, learning difficulties, and those with mild mental retardation.
7. Recreation/ extra-curricular and cultural activities for children.
8. Provision of class teacher aids, school counsellors and speech and language therapists in schools.
9. Psycho-social and capacity development programs for school principals, teachers, counsellors,
administrative staff and students.
10. Enhanced learning and teaching techniques.
11. Adult learning and programs geared towards the elimination of illiteracy.
12. Promotion of education action-based research.
4. Psycho-social
1. Developing skills of psycho-social and mental health workers.
2. Provision of psycho-social and counselling activities and programs, including recreational and venting
out activities for children, youth and women.
3. Support for counselling, social and legal programs including professional therapeutic treatment and
awareness activities on how to deal with children in times of crisis.
4. Rehabilitation of children with special needs.
5. Family support interventions targeting all family members.
6. Support for divorced women and care-givers.
7. Awareness raising activities.
8. Construction of safe playgrounds for children specifically in marginalized and densely populated
areas.
9. Specialized cultural clubs for children and youth.
10. Empowerment activities and skills development that lead to employment generation for women.
11. Training youth on civil defence, crisis management and emergency interventions.
12. Documentation of war crimes and violations against women and youth.
13. Relief interventions to meet basic needs of women (food supplements, hygiene kits, and clothing)
14. Employment opportunities for women in the reconstruction process including small-scale income
generating projects.
15. Support for female university students to continue their university education.
16. Advocacy and lobbying activities and initiatives to change laws pertaining to women and youth
rights.
17. Promotion of national security via promoting the culture of dialogue among youth.
18. Promotion of youth civic engagement, inclusion of youth in decision-making and promotion of
effective political participation among youth.
19. Awareness and education campaigns on human rights, democracy and good governance.
20. Knowledge of day-to-day issues and their priorities via action-oriented research.
13
External Facilitator wraps up the Focus Group Work on Psychosocial Sector
1. The Palestinian NGO Network (PNGO) plays a significant role in sectoral coordination and
therefore should be a source of information.
2. The coordination between NGOs working in health and the Ministry of Health is regulated by
law.
3. There is a need for a joint data base that tracks persons with disabilities, equipment and materials
provided to them.
4. There is a need for synergy and complimentarity among NGOs in service provision and exchange
of knowledge, experiences and information.
5. Coordination mechanisms should be established between women working NGOs and the
various governmental institutions, particularly for those NGOs that need legal advices and
protection.
6. NGOs compete against one another for funding disregarding if the funding falls within their
mandate and scope of work.
7. NGOs working in education should pursue staff exchange with CBOs to strengthen their
capacities.
8. There is a need to establish a committee comprised of NGOs working in the field of education,
the Ministry of Education and experts in education psychology.
9. Inadequate integrated and shared data bases and information systems led to duplication.
10. Inadequate sectoral networking or coordinating bodies.
11. Inadequate coordination among NGOs and governmental institutions.
In response to the lack of information exchange among the various NGOs, NDC emphasised the role
of the Palestinian NGOs Portal (Masader) (www.masader.ps) which works as a platform of information
exchange among the NGO sector. Currently, Masader includes approximately 450 member NGOs from
the West Bank and Gaza. Masader empowers the NGO sector through assisting NGOs in overcoming
geographical limitations and providing them with opportunities for communication amongst each
other and among other relevant parties.
14
NGOs Working Group for Community Rehabilitation Sector
15
6. Main Conclusions
The main conclusions of the rapid needs assessment for the NGOs working in the above mentioned fields
are as follows:
1. The role of NGOs is complimentary in scope and quality to the services provided by governmental
institutions.
2. Some established NGOs are donor-driven.
3. A number of NGOs have changed their scope of work from that of service delivery to relief.
4. There is a need for better coordination between all stakeholders including the PA, NGOs/CBOs,
the private sector, and a focus on sustainable sectoral development plans/projects.
5. There is a considerable increase in community needs regarding services provided by NGOs.
6. There is substantial material damage to NGOs’ offices and infrastructure.
7. NGO capacity in emergency management needs to be strengthened by providing trainings to
NGO staff on how to prepare emergency plans and act once occurring.
8. Palestinian citizens need to be empowered to demand and protect their rights in addition to
lobby and advocate for: (1) influencing Palestinian laws, policies and developmental strategies
(2) highlighting the Israeli occupation including buffer zones in the Gaza Strip and (3) restoring
the Palestinian political and social fabric through ending the internal divide.
9. There is a need to participate in the reconstruction phase including collection of data and
assessment of needs and priorities, formulation of visions and plans, implementation, monitoring
and evaluation to ensure transparency and accountability.
10. There is a need for action-oriented research studies to support decision-making.
11. War crimes and human rights violations need to be documented.
12. There is a need to conduct a damage assessment study of the NGO sector in the Gaza Strip.
13. There is a need for additional resources (human, equipment, tools, materials, office space, and
financial) in order for NGOs to be able to meet the growing demands.
14. There is a need to improve the synergy and complimentarity among NGOs on one hand and
among NGOs and the governmental institutions on the other.
15. There is a need to establish an integrated shared data base for sectoral NGOs.
16
MAP 2 (Bisection of the Gaza Strip)
Annex 1. Lists of Participants
NDC
Mr. Alaa Ghalayini, Gaza Program Manager
Community Activists
1. Dr. Bassan Abu Hamad, Health
2. Mr. Husam Hamdouna, Remedial Education
3. Mr. Munther Al-Rayyes, Agriculture
4. Mr. Mohammed Omar, Rehabilitation
5. Ms. Zainab Ghonaimi, Women’s Rights
6. Dr. Yousef Safi, Youth Human Rights and Civic Engagement
Health Sector
1. Palestinian Medical Relief Committees
2. Union of Health Work Committees
3. Gaza Community Mental Health Program
4. Palestinian Red Crescent Society in Gaza Strip
5. Ard El Insan Palestinian Benevolent
6. Happy House Association for Mother and Child Care
7. Health Care Committees
Agriculture Sector
1. Arab Center for Agriculture Development
2. Ma’an Development Center
3. Union of Agriculture Work Committees
4. Palestinian Hydrology Group for Water and Environmental Resources Development
5. The Agriculture Development Association (PARC)
6. Khuza’a Permculture Center Association
7. Olive Trees Protection National Association
18
Psychosocial Sector
1. Culture and Free Thought Association
2. Palestine Save the Children Foundation
3. Basma Society for Culture and Arts
4. Fekra Arts Institute
5. Women’s Affairs Center, Gaza
6. Women’s Affairs Technical Committee
7. Sharek Youth Forum
8. The Palestinian Youth Association for Leadership and Rights Activation (PYLARA)
9. The Palestinian Non-Governmental Organization Network
10. Carmel Cultural Association
11. Youth Without Borders
12. Palestinian Friendship Center for Development
13. Amera Society for Teaching and Developing the Palestinian Woman
14. Al Ataa Benevolent Association
15. Panorama
Education Sector
1. The Palestinian Early Childhood Programs
2. El-Amal Rehabilitation Society, Rafah
3. Society of Remedial Education Center
4. Nour El-Marefa El-Khariria Association
5. Tamer Institute for Community Education
6. The Gulf Educational Association
7. Palestine Red Crescent Society
19
Annex 2. List of Reviewed Documents
20
21
Head Office: Gaza Branch Office:
Mojahed Building, Ramallah-Jerusalem Rd, Al-Ram. Al Haitham Building 3, GF, Rashid Street
P. O Box 2173, Ramallah, Palestine. Al Rimal, Gaza
Tel: 972 2 234 7771-5, Fax: 972 2 234 7776 Tel: 972 8 282 8999, Fax: 972 8 284 9921
Email: [email protected]
Website: www.ndc.ps
22