0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views

Tutorial 1

The document discusses the utility function U(x, y) = x + y for two goods and derives the indirect utility function and ordinary demand using Roy's identity. It also explores the expenditure function and computes Hicksian compensated demand using Shepherd's Lemma. The analysis includes utility maximization and expenditure minimization under various constraints and price changes.

Uploaded by

va107
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views

Tutorial 1

The document discusses the utility function U(x, y) = x + y for two goods and derives the indirect utility function and ordinary demand using Roy's identity. It also explores the expenditure function and computes Hicksian compensated demand using Shepherd's Lemma. The analysis includes utility maximization and expenditure minimization under various constraints and price changes.

Uploaded by

va107
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Question 1 Let U (x, y) = x + y be the utility function for two goods, good x and good
y. Find the indirect utility function and use roy’s identity to find the ordinary demand.

Answer 1 First, do the utility maximization



max x + y s.t. px ∗ x + Py ∗ y − M

L = x + y − λ(px ∗ x + Py ∗ y − M )
∂L
= 1 − λ ∗ Px
∂x
∂L 1
= √ − λ ∗ Py
∂y 2 y
1
λ=
Px
1
λ= √
Py ∗ 2 y
P2
ŷ = x2
4Py
1 P2
x̂ = ∗ [M − x ]
Px 4Py
√ 1 Px 2
Px
Note that indirect utility function is V (Px , Py , M ) = x̂ + ŷ = Px
∗ [M − 4P y
] + 2P y
. Then
use the roy’s identity which is follows:
∂V
xd = − ∂P
∂V
x

∂M
∂V
∂Py
yd = − ∂V
∂M

∂V ∂V

Now, compute − ∂P
∂V
x
and − ∂Py
∂V .
∂M ∂M

∂V 1 P2
= 2 ∗ [M − x ]
∂Px Px 4Py
∂V Px
=
∂Py 4Py2
∂V 1
=
∂M Px
Verify the identity. Similarly do for the Cobb-Douglas utility function.

Question 2 Let U (x, y) = x + y be the utility function for two goods, good x and good
y. Find the expenditure function.

1
Answer 2 For expenditure function the objective function is Px ∗x+Py ∗y and the constraint

is Ū = x + y. Then we do the expenditure minimization problem:


max px ∗ x + Py ∗ y s.t. x + y = Ū

L = px ∗ x + Py ∗ y − λ(x + y − Ū )
∂L
= Px − λ
∂x
∂L λ
= Py − √
∂y 2 y
λ = Px
λ
λ= √
2 y
P2
ŷ = x2
4Py
Px
x̂ = Ū −
2Py
2
Px
Px
And the expenditure function is e(Px , Py , Ū ) = Px ∗ x̂ + Py ∗ ŷ = Px ∗ [Ū − 2P y
] + Py ∗ 4P 2 =
y
Px2
Px ∗ Ū − 4Py
.

Question 3 Find out the Hicksian compensated demand for the U (x, y) = x + y using
the expenditure function via Shepherd’s Lemma. utility maximisation along the Hicksian
compensated budget line.

Answer 3 We have the expenditure function from above question. Shephard’s lemma is as
follows:
∂e
xh =
∂Px
∂e
yh =
∂Py

Where xh , y h are hicksian demand for good x, y respectively. Now compute the above:
∂e Px
xh = = Ū −
∂Px 2Py
∂e P2
yh = = x2
∂Py 4Py

Now, to find the hicksian compensated demand by using the utility maximization way,
we start with a price vector (Px , Py ) and suppose the price of good x changes to Px′ . Now

2
from question 1 we know that demand bundle of good x, y are as follows:

Px2
ŷ =
4Py2
1 P2
x̂ = ∗ [M − x ]
Px 4Py

Now for hicksian compensated demand we find out the utility of the demand bundle,
Px2 ′ 2 Px′
which is Ū = P1x ∗ [M − 4P y
Px
] + 2P y
= P1x ∗ [M h − (P4Pxy) ] + 2P y
. Then, we find the demand

bundle at price vector (Px , Py ) which is :

(Px′ )2
ŷ =
4Py2
1 h (Px′ )2
x̂ = ∗ [M − ]
Px′ 4Py
Px ′ ′ 2
Where M h is the compensated income, which is M h = Px′ ∗ [Ū − 2P y
] + (P4Pxy) . Substituting
′Px
that will give us x̂ = Ū − 2P y
. Note that this is same as if we compute the hicksian demand

at price vector (Px , Py ) in above.

You might also like