Scribd
Upload
7 views2 pages

Stat Report

The document presents statistical analyses using various tests including paired-samples t-test, one-sample t-test, independent samples t-test, and one-way ANOVA to evaluate the effectiveness of training programs and teaching methods on student scores. Significant results were found for each test, indicating improvements in scores post-training, differences in average scores compared to a national average, gender differences in exam scores, and variations in scores across different teaching methods. The findings highlight the importance of statistical testing in educational assessments.

Uploaded by

Jannah Santos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
7 views2 pages

Stat Report

The document presents statistical analyses using various tests including paired-samples t-test, one-sample t-test, independent samples t-test, and one-way ANOVA to evaluate the effectiveness of training programs and teaching methods on student scores. Significant results were found for each test, indicating improvements in scores post-training, differences in average scores compared to a national average, gender differences in exam scores, and variations in scores across different teaching methods. The findings highlight the importance of statistical testing in educational assessments.

Uploaded by

Jannah Santos
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Republic of the Philippines

North Eastern Mindanao State University


Statistical Reporting: Coverage for Quiz and Exam with Sample Dataset
1. Paired-Samples T-test
Scenario
A researcher wants to test whether a training program improves
students' math scores.
Dataset:
o Pre-training scores: [78,82,84,76,80]
o Post-training scores: [85,88,86,80,82]
Analysis
1. Calculate the difference between paired scores.
2. Test if the mean difference is significantly different from 0.
Results
t(4) = 4.38, p = 0.012, Mdiff = 5.2, SDdiff = 2.28
Reporting
A paired-samples t-test was conducted to compare pre-training and
post-training math scores. The results revealed a significant increase in
scores after training (Mdiff = 5.2, SDdiff = 2.28 t(4) = 4.38, p = 0.012)

2. One-Sample T-test
Scenario
A school aims to determine if their students’ average test score differs
from the national average of 75.
Dataset: [78,82,84,76,80]
Analysis
Test if the sample mean (M = 80) differs significantly from 75.
Results
t(4) = 2.94, p = 0.043, M = 80.0, SD = 3.16
Reporting:
A one-sample t-test was conducted to compare the students’ average
score to the national average of 75. Results indicated a significant
difference (M = 80.0, SD = 3.16, t(4) = 2.94, p = 0.043)

3. Independent Samples T-test


Scenario

Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300


086-211-4221
www.nemsu.edu.ph
Republic of the Philippines
North Eastern Mindanao State University
A researcher wants to compare the exam scores of male and female
students.

Dataset
o Male: [78,80,85,83,79]
o Female: [88,84,86,90,87]
Analysis
Test if the mean scores differ significantly between groups.
Results
Reporting
An independent-samples t-test was conducted to compare exam scores
for male and female students. Female students (M = 87, SD = 2.00)
scored significantly higher than male students (M = 81.0, SD =
2.92), t(8) = −3.82, p = 0.005.

4. One-Way ANOVA
Scenario
A researcher wants to test if three teaching methods lead to different
test scores.
Dataset:
o Method 1: [85,88,84,86,89]
o Method 2: [80,82,81,83,85]
o Method 3: [78,76,79,75,77]
Analysis
Test if the group means differ significantly.
Results
F(2,12) = 21.46, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.782
Reporting
A one-way ANOVA was conducted to compare the effect of three
teaching methods on test scores. There was a significant effect of
teaching method on test scores, F(2,12) = 21.46, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.782.
Post-hoc comparisons using Tukey’s HSD test revealed that Method 1 (M
= 86.4, SD = 1.67) scored significantly higher than Method 2 (M = 82.2,
SD = 1.79) and Method 3 (M = 77.0, SD = 1.58), while Method 2 also
scored significantly higher than Method 3.

Rosario, Tandag City, Surigao del Sur 8300


086-211-4221
www.nemsu.edu.ph

You might also like