Scribd
Upload
23 views1 page

Report Contents

The document outlines a comparative evaluation of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) using Ansys Workbench, detailing the research question, methodology, and findings. It includes sections on the development of finite element models for both modal and static analysis, results discussions, and conclusions. Additionally, it provides guidelines for structuring the research paper, including an abstract, introduction, methodology, results, and references.

Uploaded by

Mona
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
23 views1 page

Report Contents

The document outlines a comparative evaluation of Finite Element Analysis (FEA) using Ansys Workbench, detailing the research question, methodology, and findings. It includes sections on the development of finite element models for both modal and static analysis, results discussions, and conclusions. Additionally, it provides guidelines for structuring the research paper, including an abstract, introduction, methodology, results, and references.

Uploaded by

Mona
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Comparative Evaluation of FEA in Ansys

Workbench
line 1: 1st Given Name Surname
line 2: dept. name of organization
(of Affiliation)
line 3: name of organization
(of Affiliation)
line 4: City, Country
line 5: email address or ORCID

Abstract—It should be a brief summary of approximately B. Development of FE model for modal analsysis
300 words. It should include the research question, the
Describe how you have developed finite element model
motivation for the study, the method and the main findings.
for carrying our modal analysis and how it is different
Keywords—Include important words for your work like compared to static analysis.
kinematic analysis, IC engine
III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
I. INTRODUCTION In this section, present your results and discuss the results
Provide the necessary background or context for your with its physical meanings and limitations.
research problem. Try to place your research context in the A. Total displacement
context of either a current "hot" area. Provide a brief and
appropriate historical background. Identify "important Present total displacement for 1D, 2D and 3D analysis.
players" and refer to the most relevant and representative Plot a chart comparing the differences in the value of
publications. displacement in all three cases. Discuss results.

Address following points in Introduction: B. Maximum stress


Present maximum stress for 1D, 2D and 3D analysis. Plot
1. State the research problem a chart comparing the differences in the value of stresses in
2. Provide the context and its necessity and all three cases. Discuss results.
importance. C. Modal analysis
3. Briefly describe the major issues to be addressed by Present first 10 natural frequencies in a tabular form for
your research. all the three cases. Discuss results.
4. Set the limitation of your proposed research in order IV. CONCLUSIONS
to provide a clear focus.
It should be a brief summary of the major contributions
II. METHEDOLOGY of this research and your findings and recommendations..
Provide your work plan and describe the activities REFERENCES
necessary for the completion of your research.
(Use following style for references)
Following questions are required to be addressed in this
section: [1] G. Eason, B. Noble, and I. N. Sneddon, “On certain integrals of
Lipschitz-Hankel type involving products of Bessel functions,” Phil.
1. What kind of design do you choose? Questionnaire Trans. Roy. Soc. London, vol. A247, pp. 529–551, April 1955.
study or a laboratory experiment? (references)
[2] J. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed.,
2. What kind of measuring instruments/software/tools vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68–73.
do you use? Why do you choose them? [3] I. S. Jacobs and C. P. Bean, “Fine particles, thin films and exchange
3. How do you plan to carry out your study? What anisotropy,” in Magnetism, vol. III, G. T. Rado and H. Suhl, Eds.
New York: Academic, 1963, pp. 271–350.
activities are involved? How long does it take?.
[4] K. Elissa, “Title of paper if known,” unpublished.
A. Development of FE model for static analsysis [5] R. Nicole, “Title of paper with only first word capitalized,” J. Name
Stand. Abbrev., in press.
Describe how you have developed finite element model
[6] Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, “Electron
along with the application of material, cross-section, spectroscopy studies on magneto-optical media and plastic substrate
boundary conditions, forces and meshing. Insert figures for interface,” IEEE Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp. 740–741, August
better understanding. 1987 [Digests 9th Annual Conf. Magnetics Japan, p. 301, 1982].
[7] M. Young, The Technical Writer’s Handbook. Mill Valley, CA:
University Science, 1989.

You might also like