Advance Course (Without Password)
Advance Course (Without Password)
ADVANCE COURSE
FOR
MECHANICAL ENGINEER
For any problem in any topic which is not cleared in video and E-Book
you can whatsapp on 8929155053, possible help will given to you.
Thank you
7QC Tools :- It is basically a problem solving tool. This are very
important tool to identify, analyze and solve the problem. It is used to find
solution in systematic manner.
Other names of 7QC tools is :-
(1) The Old Seven. (2) The First Seven. (3) The Basic Seven.
Page 1
(3) Stratification, Graphs , PFD :- To understand the problem deeply.
It includes flow chart, bar graph, pie graph, line graph, radar graph and
stratification.
(4) Fish bone diagram :- To find out the actual cause of problem.
Invented by Dr. Kaoru Ishikawa, also called Ishikawa diagram and cause
and effect diagram.
(7) Control charts and Run charts :- Control chart is used to know
weather the process in control or not. Invented by Dr. Walter Andrew
Shewhart in 1924. He also invented PDCA cycle.
Page 2
Application of QC tools in problem solving
Pareto chart
Stratification
Tally sheet
Histogram
Fish bone
diagram
diagram
Control
Graphs
Scatter
Charts
Strong-
PFD
Normal-
Identification of
problem
Defining the
problem
Record of Facts
Detecting cause of
problem
Develop
improvement
method
Implementation
Evaluation of Result
Process control
(standardization )
Page 3
What is check sheet ?
The check sheet is a form (document) used to collect data in real time at
the location where the data is generated. The check sheet is sometimes
called a tally sheet.
Purpose:- Tool is used for counting, organizing and measuring the data.
Data collacted can be used as input data for other quality tools.
Benefits :-
(1) Collect data in systematic and organised manner.
(2) To determine source of problem
(3) For stratification of data.
Kaoru Ishikawa identified five uses for check sheet in quality control
(1) To check the shape of the probability distribution of a process in
histogram
(2) To quantify defects by type
(3) To quantify defects by location- Cocentration chart or cencetration
digram
(4) To quantify defects by cause (6m - men, method, material motion etc.
(5) To keep track of the completion of step in a multistep procedure.
Page 4
Example :- process audit check sheet. Preventive maintenance checkheet,
product audit, check sheet, employee joining check sheet.
Types of Data
(1) Quantitive data (2) Qualitative data
Page 5
Check sheet also called tally sheet but there are difference in both
Page 6
Steps to make defect check sheet
(1) Define the rejction
(2) Make a drwing / picture of defected part.
(3) At the time of checking , if rejection found then mark it on
same location of drawing. Generally cross mark done, or your defined
symbol
(4) Data is ready for analysis now write the defect with defect quantity
in each location
Page 7
AQE Training & HR Consultancy
Checks
Spec.=
Deviation Frequency
5.50±0.10
5 10 15 20
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6 1
-5 2
-4 3
-3 6
-2 7
-1 9
5.50±0.10 0 12
1 10
2 7
3 5
4 3
5 2
6 1
7
8
9
10
Production process distribution chart Total 68
Page 8
Numbers of defects occurred in month with rejection percentage in Tally sheet
Page 9
Defect Location Check Sheet or Concentration diagram
A B C D
1 1
2 2 3
3
4 6
Page 10
Defect Cause Check Sheet
Ram
Flange
Shyam
Sonu
Braze
Nipple
Monu
Page 11
HES (HEALTH, ENVIRONMENT & SAFETY) AUDIT CHECK-SHEET
UNIT NAME: AQE Training & HR Consultancy AUDIT DATE: AUDITED BY:
Grand
S.No. Description Yes No N/A Remarks/ Possible Actions for Improvements
S.NO.
C Fire Protection
6 C2 Does each area's plant personnel are conversant with fire extinguishers
9 D1 Whether all the lifting equipment are marked with SWL (Safe Working Load)
F Safety Inspections
15 F3 Does the organization have Safety Tree/Safety Cross for Monitoring of Accidents
17 F5 NO loose wire
Grand
S.No. Description Yes No N/A Remarks/ Possible Actions for Improvements
S.NO.
21 G2 Safety Trainings
TOTAL SCORE
Page 13
DOC NO. F/AQE/19
AQE WASHROOM CLEANING DAILY CHECK SHEET MONTH :- August REV NO. "00
REV DATE 11-Nov-2019
TIME CLEANING AREA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
FLOOR CLEANING
MIRROR CLEANING
SOAP AVAILABLE
WATER AVAILABLE
FLOOR CLEANING
MIRROR CLEANING
SOAP AVAILABLE
2:30 AM TOWEL AVAILABLE
WATER POINT NOT LEAK
WATER AVAILABLE
WASH FACE CLEANING
FLOOR CLEANING
MIRROR CLEANING
SOAP AVAILABLE
6:30 AM TOWEL AVAILABLE
WATER POINT NOT LEAK
WATER AVAILABLE
WASH FACE CLEANING
HOUSE KEEPING SIGN
HR INCHARGE SIGN
Page 14
What is a Pareto Chart ?
It is the tool which is used to priorities the data. Pareto chart is invented by
Vilfredo Pareto. He is given 80 / 20 principal. It is a combination of
bar graph and line graph
After that, an American Quality Control Authority, Mr.Juran used
it in the field of Quality Control.
Page 15
Note :- For Pareto chart data will comes from Tally sheet.
Page 16
What is major drawback of Basic Pareto Chart ?
Basic Pareto chart only Priorities the data but never tells about severity.
Example :- A car have break fail issue and 50 dents on its body.
Pareto chart Priorities the dents. Basically pareto chart is ok. But we have
to use our common sense,
and find the answer, Is dents is more Sevier or break fail is more Sevier.
of course break fail is more Sevier then dents.
But basic pareto chart are not useful in that condition.
In this condition we have to use Weighted Pareto Chart as well as our
Common sense.
Page 17
How to make Pareto chart
Step 1
We need data which we have to priorities, It will comes from tally sheet.
Data is from your company , office, school etc.
For example :- This is our data
Sl no Defect No of defect
1 Dent 26
2 crack 99
3 fitment out 47
4 Pipe collapse 72
5 Under brazing 58
6 over brazing 99
7 Batch code missing 39
8 Plating peel off 108
Step 2
2 crack 99
3 fitment out 47
4 Pipe collapse 72
5 Under brazing 58
6 over brazing 99
7 Batch code missing 39
8 Plating peel off 108
Page 18
After select sort & filter go to custom sort.
This type of bar comes.
Page 19
After that data data will be in descending form see below
Sl no Defect No of defect
1 Plating peel off 108
2 crack 99
3 over brazing 99
4 Pipe collapse 72
5 Under brazing 58
6 fitment out 47
7 Batch code missing 39
8 Dent 26
Step 3
Find cumulative frequency Write Cumulative frequency here
Cumulative
Sl no Defect No of defect
frequency
1 Plating peel off 108 108
2 crack 99 207
3 over brazing 99 306
4 Pipe collapse 72 378
5 Under brazing 58 436
6 fitment out 47 483
7 Batch code missing 39 522
8 Dent 26 548
Total 548
Write No of defects 1st column qty. in cumulative frequency 1st column
After that go to cumulative frequency 2nd column and put the cursor on
corner of column then + sign show then drag the column below.
Page 20
Note :-Total of Number of defects and cumulative frequency last column
quantity should be equal.
Cumulative Cumulative
Sl no Defect No of defect
frequency percentage
1 Plating peel off 108 108 19.71
2 crack 99 207 37.77
3 over brazing 99 306 55.84
4 Pipe collapse 72 378 68.98
5 Under brazing 58 436 79.56
6 fitment out 47 483 88.14
7 Batch code missing 39 522 95.26
8 Dent 26 548 100.00
Total 548
After that drag the formula to last column , if last column comes 100 then
formula is correct otherwise there have some issue in formula.
Step 4
Now data is ready to draw the graph
Page 21
Then go to column and enter on column graph.
After that this type of graph open, till now we have not selected any data.
Page 22
After that right click in graph
Page 23
After that this option open.
Now you have to select the data that is defect and no of defect column and
then press come (,) and select cumulative percentage and then press enter.
Page 24
After that this type of chart is open.
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Plating crack over Pipe Under fitment Batch Dent
peel off brazing collapse brazing out code
missing
Now you have seen No. of defects and cumulative percentage both in bar
shape.
Now select cumulative frequency bar and then right click , then change
series chart type option seen then select this option.
Now go to line option and select below listed graph and press enter.
Page 25
After that below listed graph is open
120 120.00
100 100.00
80 80.00
60 60.00
40 40.00
20 20.00
0 0.00
Plating peel crack Pipe Under fitment outBatch code Dent
over brazing
off collapse brazing missing
After that select the line and right click, and select format data series.
Page 26
After that select on line and double click on line after that layout option
show, select layout, and then select data labels.
55.84
60 60.00
108
99
37.77 99
40 40.00
72
19.71 58
47
20 39 20.00
26
0 0.00
Plating peel crack Pipe Under fitment outBatch code Dent
over brazing
off collapse brazing missing
Page 27
After that select on percentage and double click on it
After that this type of option open, select on maximum, fixed option and
select 100 on it.
Page 28
BRAIN STORMING
Page 29
(2) Unstructured method :-
In this method, a group of 5-6 people or CFT team participate in this
session
Each member sit around a table.
In this method everybody is free to give his suggestion.
Members having more ideas can share their ideas freely
After categories all ideas actions are taken on possible and may possible
cause, not possible cause have no action taken.
Important points
(1) Fish bone diagram is used in all type of problem solving methodology.
(2) Fish bone diagram is called it because its shape looks like a fish bone.
(3) It is very important tool to identified potential / possible root cause.
(4) 6M used in fish bone diagram is :- (i) Men (ii) Method (iii) Material
(iv) mother nature (environment) (v) Machine (vi) Measurement
(5) We only find potential / possible causes only, root cause is not find
in this process.
(6) After find possible cause we have to use another tool to find root
cause. Example :- Validation method , Why-Why analysis etc.
(7) For find out potential / possible cause in fish bone diagram, we need
to do first brainstorming.
After brainstorming potential causes are filled in to fish bone diagram,
Page 31
Category wise, that is men related cause in men column etc.
(8) There are primary, secondary or tracery cause or 4th level or may be
5th level of cause identified depend upon team maturity.
(9) It is minimum required 20 to 25 possible cause identified for a good
identification of cause, many industry identify only 5 to 6 cause , it is not a
good practice.
Step 1 :- Make fish bone diagram and write all possible causes in 6M
after brainstorming session.
Step 2 :- Find out suspected cause from the possible cause.
Step 3 :- Validate all the suspect cause and write the result. All the
validated results are valid cause of problem.
Step 4 :- Do the Why - Why analysis of the valid cause and find out the
root causes of the problem.
Page 32
INTERNAL / CUSTOMER NAME :- ANNAXURE :- 1
FISH BONE DIAGRAM, CAUSE & EFFECT FOR
PROJECT NAME :-
TEAM MEMBER :-
Quality Problem
PROCEDURE GAUGING TEMPRATURE
PREPARED BY :- VERIFIED BY :-
Page 33
Supplier Name:
CATEGORY PROBABLE CAUSES REQUIREMENT / SPECIFICATION VERIFICATION METHOD ACTUAL OBSERVED RESULT
Not applicable
MACHINE
METHOD
Wi displayed on final inspection
WI not displayed Verified on table Available on table INVALID
table
Check with Daily inspection
Inspection Frequency Not Adequate 100 % material check record of inspector, how much 100 % material check INVALID
quantity they checked
Not applicable
MATERIAL
Page 34
PFD / PFC stands for process flow diagram or process flow chart.
PFD / PFC is a important tool of PPAP
Flow chart is a important tool of 7QC tools.
A flowchart is a type of diagram that represents a workflow or process.
Commonly alternative names used for flow chart is: flow chart, process
flowchart, functional flowchart, process map, process chart, functional
process chart, business process model, process model, process flow
diagram, work flow diagram, business flow diagram.
Page 35
ANSI and ISO give some symbols of PFD or Flow charts which description
given below.
Name Symbol Description
Page 36
Process Flow Diagram
Part Name ABC Date of Origin 09.01.2019 P.F.D. No.: PFD/AQE/01
Customer Part No. 123 Process Responsibility PFD. Rev. No. & Date
Model No. PK Production & Quality Assurance 00 & 09.01.2019
Operation Characteristics
Process
PROCESS Source of Variation Control Method
Description Flow Diagram Products Process
No.
Material Grade Raw
Receipt of Raw Spectro Analysis
OP-10 Diameter Storage + Inspection Material
Material Receiving Inspection
Hardness Supplier
Set- Up Approval
Dimensional Tool wear Out/
OP-20 Cold Forging Cold Forging Inprocess Inspection
Variation Over run
Tool life Monitoring
Temp.- 650° ± 10°
Hardness S. Time- 180 Min. Set- Up Approval
OP-30 Stress Relieving Out Source
Variation Cooling time -6 Hrs. Inprocess Inspection
Cooling Temp. - 200°
Grade- S280
OP-40 Shot Blasting Scaling not remove Size:- 0.40 Out Source Clock-
Time:- 15 Min. Cleaning Freq.-
Receiving Dimensional
OP-50 50-55 HRB & Scaling Receipt Stage Receiving Inspection
Inspection Variation
RPM: 2800 Set- Up Approval
Dimensional
OP-60 Machining 1st Feed: 0.12 In House Inprocess Inspection
Variation
Tool Life: 300 pcs. Tool life Monitoring
RPM: 2800 Set- Up Approval
Dimensional
OP-70 Machining 2nd Feed: 0.12 In House Inprocess Inspection
Variation
Tool Life: 300 pcs. Tool life Monitoring
Page 37
Page 38
Why Graph is used ?
When data is shown in pictorial form then graph is used. Graph is used to
reporting the management and for better understanding in short time of period.
Purpose :- A picture tell more then thousand words.
(1) Bar Graph :- A bar chart or bar graph is a chart or graph that presents
different category data with rectangular bars.
A bar graph may run horizontally or vertically. The important thing to know is
that the longer the bar, the greater its value.
A bar graph will have two axes. One axis will describe the types of categories
being compared, and the other will have numerical values that represent the
values of the data.
Page 39
(2) Horizontal Bar Graph :- It is used when long labels (name of bar )
required. Converting the vertical data to a horizontal bar chart solves this
problem
(3) Stacked Bar Graph :- A stacked bar chart also shows sub-groups, but the
sub-groups are stacked on the same bar. It shows lot of data in graph,
generally it is not used in automobile industry.
(2) Pie Graph :-A pie chart (or a circle chart) is a circular statistical graphic,
which is divided into slices to illustrate numerical proportion.
They're widely used in business presentations
Nowadays Pie chart is not used in 7QC tools.
(b) It is also used in sports to show the strength and weakness of player, and
generally called spider chart.
Page 40
Other name of Radar Chart is Web chart, Spider chart, Star Chart, Star Plot,
Cobweb chart, Irregular Polygon, Polar chart, Kiviat diagram.
(4) Line Graph :- A Graph to show the changes in quantum w.r.t. to change
in condition.
A line graph, also known as a line chart, is a type of chart used to visualize the
value of something over time.
Page 41
Different types of Graphs in 7QC tools
The most commonly graph used is listed below :-
(1) Bar Graph
(2) Pie Graph
(3) Radar Graph
(4) Line Graph
Step 1
We need Data
80
70
60
50
40
75
65
30 60
45
20 40
30
10
0
January February March April May June
Page 42
How to draw Pie graph
(2) Pie Graph
Step 1
We need Data
Step 2
We need to calculate percentage of data
Go to insert option, select Pie graph in charts, and now select 1st Pie
graph then press ok. Now right click on blank graph, select data now go
to chart data range and select activity data , percentage and enter.
( for better understanding go to AQE TRAININGS YouTube channel )
School Home work Sleep Play
13%
38%
25%
25%
Page 43
How to draw Radar graph
(3) Radar Graph
Step 1
We need Data
Computer Science
SST
Page 44
How to draw Line graph
(4) Line Graph
Step 1
We need Data
Days Rainfall in mm
14-Aug 5
15-Aug 2
16-Aug 12
17-Aug 7
18-Aug 8
19-Aug 4
20-Aug 3
21-Aug 2
22-Aug 6
Step 2
Go to insert option and click on insert line graph and select 1st line
graph.
Page 45
Now click left button on blank chart and click on select data option then
below showed option open
Now go to add option, In series name write chart name and in series
value put Rainfall in mm data.
Days Rainfall in mm
14-Aug 5 After select (days ) data and
15-Aug 2 insert in horizontal and then
16-Aug 12 press ok
17-Aug 7
18-Aug 8
19-Aug 4 If don’t understand then go to
20-Aug 3 AQE TRAININGS graph
21-Aug 2 video
22-Aug 6
8
8 7
6
6 5
4
4 3
2 2
2
0
14-Aug 15-Aug 16-Aug 17-Aug 18-Aug 19-Aug 20-Aug 21-Aug 22-Aug
Days
Page 46
What is stratification ?
Quality Glossary Definition: Stratification
Stratification is defined as the act of sorting data, people, and objects into
different groups or layers. It is a technique used in combination with other
data analysis tools. When data from variety of source gets lumped
its loses its meaning and purpose.
together,
Stratification separates the data so that pattern can be seen clearly.
This data and analysis technique separates the data so that patterns can be
collection
seen and is considered one of the seven basic quality tools.
Remember :-
(1) When plotting or graphing the collected data on a scatter
diagram,
chart, histogram,
control or other analysis tool, use different marks or colors to
distinguish data from various sources.
Data that are distinguished in this way are said to be "stratified."
On the other hand I opened my middle range car showroom near airport or
the area where actors, billaniors lived,
Is my showroom will run ? Off course big No
Before open showroom, we have to stratify the location. And open right
showroom in right location. This is called stratification means sorting.
Page 47
General
Stratification
Pyramid on the basis
of Income
Stratified Data
Time 21.08.19 22.08.19 23.08.19 24.08.19
9.00-10.00 15 20 10 16
10.00-11.00 3 5 2 5
11.00-12.00 2 2 2 1
12.00-1.00 3 2 1 1
1.00-1.30 Lunch
1.30-2.30 10 15 15 15
2.30-3.30 3 1 3 4
3.30-4.30 2 4 1 3
4.30-5.30 2 1 1 1
Total 40 55 35 46
Page 48
A Real Example and Story of Stratification tool used.
The “moral” of this story is that after using Stratification tool, daily
monitoring, actual reading the engineer found actual problem.
Page 49
Scatter diagram :- Scatter diagram is a graphical representation of
relationship between two variables. It can be between a Cause
and Effect and between causes. Scatter diagram also known as x y chart.
It is invented by Sir Francis Galton, and first used in 1888 by Francis.
In 1950s Dr.K.Ishikawa popularized the use of scatter diagram.
Page 50
Points remember before draw scatter diagram
Please keep in mind that the scatter diagram is different than the Ishikawa
diagram. The Ishikawa (fishbone) diagram shows you only the variables; it
does not show you the relationship between these variables. However, the
fishbone diagram can help you draw the scatter diagram;
for example, you can find the two variables (cause and effect), and then
draw the scatter diagram to analyze the relationship between them.
Note :- (1) One diagram can only handle two variable.
(2) For construct diagram minimum data should 30 or maximum 100.
(1) Scatter diagrams are unable to give you the exact extent of correlation.
(2) This chart does not show you the relationship for more than two
variables.
Page 51
In this type of scatter diagram, data points are spread so randomly that you
cannot draw any line through them.
In this case you can say that there is no relation between these two
variables.
Here, the data points are little closer together and you can feel that some
kind of relation exists between these two variables.
There may be positive correlation present or may be negative correlation
present.
Page 52
In positive slant, the correlation will be positive, i.e. as the value of x
increases, the value of y will also increase. You can say that the slope of
straight line drawn along the data points will go up. The pattern will
resemble the straight line.
For example, if the temperature goes up, cold drink sales will also go up.
For example, if the temperature goes up, sales of winter coats goes
down.
Page 53
How to draw Scatter diagram
Step 1
We need data :
Note :- Minimum 30 value required to plot a scatter diagram.
22 2200 2500
23 2300 2000
24 2400 1500
25 2500 1000
26 2600 500
27 2700
0
28 2800 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
29 2900 Hours
30 3000
Page 54
Histogram :- It is used to
check centering, spread
and shape of the process. It
is invented by Karl Pearson
in 1891 follower of Sir
Francis Galton.
What is a Histogram?
A histogram is used to summarize data of one continuous variable that is
dimension, weight etc. It is the most commonly used graph to show
frequency distribution.
It is used to check centering or location, spread and shape of the process. It
is invented by Karl Pearson follower of Sir Francis Galton. And
histogram is one of the seven basic tools of quality control.
It looks very much like a bar chart. But there are important difference
between them. It differs from a bar graph, in the sense that a bar graph
relates two variables, but a histogram relates only one. A histogram
groups numbers into ranges .
It is recommend that bar charts have gaps between the rectangles to clarify
the difference.
Page 55
Importance of Histogram
Simple to use.
Use on all variable data.
Histogram provides a visual representation of data distribution.
Point to be Note
(1) Only 1 variable histogram is drawn in one time or one graph.
(2) For draw histogram minimum 50 to 100 psc data should available.
Scores Included in
Bin Frequency
Bin
20-30 2 25,22
30-40 4 36,38,36,38
40-50 4 46,45,48,46
50-60 5 55,55,52,58,55
60-70 3 68,67,61
70-80 1 72
80-90 0 -
90-100 1 91
Page 56
Parts of a Histogram
1. The title: The title describes the information included in the histogram.
2. X-axis: The X-axis are intervals that show the scale of values which the
measurements fall under.
3. Y-axis: The Y-axis shows the number of times that the values occurred
within the intervals set by the X-axis.
4. The bars: The height of the bar shows the number of times that the
values occurred within the interval, while the width of the bar shows the
interval that is covered. For a histogram with equal bins, the width should
be the same across all bars.
Distributions of a Histogram
Golden Point :- If your histogram have tail effect then histogram is ok.
Page 57
(1) Bell shaped distribution or symmetric distribution:- It is suitable
where the tolerance is given Bilateral ( both ± side ). Also if tolerance is
unilateral, we have to mean the tolerance and after use it.
Page 58
(3) A left-skewed distribution: A left-skewed distribution is also called a
negatively skewed distribution. As per required condition we have to use
it,
For example :- In case of school result how much students gets higher
marks.
Page 59
How to draw Histogram
Step 1
We need data : Check part and note down reading.
Note :- Histogram is made for old made parts, or say history data.
Suppose we have to check a pin of dia 20 mm.
Specification :- 20±0.20
20.07 20.05 20.01 20.00 20.02 20.01 20.00 20.05 20.04 20.07
19.97 19.91 19.96 19.90 19.96 19.92 19.99 19.96 19.94 19.97
20.02 20.09 20.05 20.05 20.05 20.03 20.08 20.06 20.04 20.02
20.19 20.15 20.16 20.16 20.19 20.14 20.17 20.14 20.14 20.19
20.14 20.11 20.14 20.13 20.16 20.15 20.16 20.13 20.14 20.14
19.97 19.96 19.96 19.92 19.92 19.96 19.95 19.92 19.94 19.97
19.87 19.88 19.82 19.83 19.83 19.87 19.84 19.81 19.84 19.87
20.04 20.08 20.00 20.05 20.04 20.08 20.03 20.06 20.04 20.04
20.13 20.13 20.11 20.16 20.15 20.19 20.12 20.15 20.14 20.13
19.99 19.94 19.92 19.94 19.96 19.90 19.91 19.96 19.94 19.99
Step 2
Calculation
Formula Result Note :- (1) When put
max(select all 100 formula 1st write =
Maximum value 20.19
nos.) enter sign.
min(select all 100 (2) How select number
Minimum value 19.81
nos.) enter of bars. Generally for
max value - min 50 values = 6 bars
Range 0.38
value 100 Values = 10 bars
count(select all 250 values = 16 bar
Total Count no. 100
values) enter over 250 = 20 Bar
Range/Number of
Bin Width 0.038
bars ( we take 10)
Page 60
Step 3
Construct frequency table
Write
Class Class Frequency
boundary
1 19.81
2 19.848
3 19.886
4 19.924
5 19.962
6 20
7 20.038
8 20.076
9 20.114
10 20.152
11 20.19
For class boundary put minimum value in 1st column and in 2nd
column put formula =1st coloumn+bin width value f4 and enter then
drag the formula to last column, if last column have maximum value
showed then formula is correct.
For frequency
go to 1st
column of
frequency now
go to Formulas
bar - More
functions -
Statistical -
Frequency then
new tab open
which is listed
below.
Page 61
After that this type of Tab is open.
After that frequency 1st column have frequency show, now select all
frequency coloum go to formula bar press ctrl+shift+enter
Page 62
Draw Histogram in excel
Histogram is ready
20
18
18
16
16
14
14
12
10 10
10 9
8 7
6
6 5
4
4
2 1
0
19.8 19.8 19.9 19.9 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.1 20.1 20.2 20.2
Page 63
Other option to make histogram
Note :- you can made histogram with data analytical tool.
For activate data analytical tool in your window 10 you have to go in file
- option - Add ins - Data tool pack and press enter.
Page 64
Control charts and Run charts :- Control chart is used to know weather
the process in control or not. Invented by Dr. Walter Andrew Shewhart
in 1924. He also invented PDCA cycle.
History.
The control chart was invented by Walter A. Shewhart working for Bell
Labs in the 1920s.
Purpose
The primary purpose of control chart is to predict expected product
outcome.
Purpose is to separate common causes from special causes of variation
and to help assign causes of variation
Benefits
Predict process out of control and out of specifications limit.
Distinguish between specific, identifiable cause of variations.
Can be used for SPC.
Page 65
Process have two types of variations
1. Chance Causes or common causes.
2. Assignable Causes or special causes.
Special causes :-
(1) Differentiate between common cause and special cause.
(2) After find special cause, eliminate or minimize the negative impact of
special cause .
(3) To change the result change the process.
Page 66
Why we not use line chart and run chart instead of control charts ?
Control chart is advanced version for understanding a problem
(1) Firstly we used the line charts for understanding a problem. But there
is no center line, to show which is the center of process
This is a simple chart , we can not get any result to see this chart.
Page 67
(3) Then we come to control chart for perfectly understand a problem.
It shows center, upper limit and lower limit of process.
A run chart is a line graph of data A control chart is also a line graph
plotted over time. of data plotted over time with
control limits.
A run chart does not show statistical Control chart have UCL and LCL,
control limits. If there is any point going outside
of the control limits it clearly
shows process is out of limits.
A run chart can help in identification A control chart also help in
of special causes in process. identification of special causes in
process and also help in achieve
Statistical process control.
Page 68
Out of control ( Control charts )
Page 69
Types of Control Charts
x - R Chart
(1) X charts show the centering (mean) of the process, with the help of
Xbar chart we control the mean of the process.
(2) R charts shows the spread of the process with the help of Rbar
chart we control process spread.
Page 70
Page 71
(8) List of Coefficients for x - R Chart.
Size of X
R Chart
Subgroup Chart
n A2 d2 D4 D3
2 1.88 1.128 3.267 0
3 1.023 1.693 2.575 0
4 0.729 2.059 2.282 0
5 0.577 2.326 2.115 0
6 0.483 2.534 2.004 0
7 0.419 2.704 1.924 0.076
8 0.373 2.847 1.864 0.136
9 0.337 2.97 1.816 0.184
10 0.308 3.078 1.777 0.223
(a)
Page 72
(b)
Shift (Run):
A shift is indicated when points lie continually on one side of the center
line, A shift of seven consecutive points is considered abnormal.
(c.)
Trends :
Seven consecutive points in a continuous upward or downward direction.
(d)
(e.)
Cycling (periodicity) :
Any repeated, consistent up and down cycle is abnormal and requires
investigation.
(f)
Page 73
How to draw Xbar-R charts
Step 1
We need data :
Note :- (a) Minimum 100 observation should taken.
(b) Number of samples should take 4 , 5 , 6 and should be
taken continuously.
For example :- If we take 5 observation in each sample and taken 100
observation then 20 data sets are made.
Page 74
Step 2
Calculate average X bar
Note where select data written put ( ) data should in bracket in everywhere.
Now 1st column average is calculated , go to the corner of X-bar 1st
column value and double click on it, all average data will shown on
below line
Calculate Range
Page 75
Now 1st column Range is calculated , go to the corner of Range 1st
column value and double click on it, all average data will shown on
below line
Page 76
Step 2
Calculate slandered deviation or Sigma
(Note :- without computer we can used root mean square method for sigma)
put = sign then
Write Stddev(std deviation formula open)
then select data (Average X-bar ) and enter.
Step 3
Calculate X double bar and upper control limit and lower control limit
Avg. X double UCL LCL
Date
(X-bar) bar (+3σ) (-3σ)
05-Oct 20.03
06-Oct 19.94
07-Oct 20.052 With paste special copy
08-Oct 20.17 and paste Avg (x-bar)
09-Oct 20.136 data
10-Oct 19.946
11-Oct 19.846
12-Oct 20.042
13-Oct 20.136
14-Oct 19.95
15-Oct 20.034
16-Oct 19.956
17-Oct 20.046
18-Oct 20.156
19-Oct 20.144
20-Oct 19.948
21-Oct 19.846
22-Oct 20.05
23-Oct 20.146
24-Oct 19.94
Page 77
Calculate X double bar
Page 78
Now put dollar, press f4, shown below. And enter.
Page 79
Now we have calculated X double bar and upper control limit and lower
control limit which is listed below.
Step 4
Draw the chart.
Now to make control charts select all data and
Go to Insert bar then select Line chart and now select 1st chart
which is listed below and press Enter. Control chart is made.
Page 80
20.4
20.3
20.2 Avg.
(X-bar)
X double bar
20.1
UCL (+3σ)
20
LCL
(-3σ)
19.9
19.8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
See X double bar and LCL value is approx. same so the center line is not
show in chart.
Why this happened because this is fake data, if we take actual data then
we get actual result.
Page 81
How to draw Range charts
Step 1
We need data :
For calculating UCL & LCL we need a reference chart which is listed
here,
Page 82
Formula for calculating R Chart
Central line : CL = R
Upper control limit : UCL = D4R
Lower control limit : LCL = D3R
Step 2
Calculate R bar
Step 3
Calculate LCL
Page 83
Step 4
Calculate UCL
UCL = D4*Rbar
= 2.115 x 0.0605
0.1280
Now UCL value is constant or fixed in all below cell (calculate it same as Rbar)
Step 4
Value of Rbar, LCL, UCL shown in below data sheet
Page 84
Step 4
Now make R chart
0.14
0.12
0.1
0.08 Range
R bar
0.06 UCL
LCL
0.04
0.02
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
Note :- LCL line not show in chart because its value is zero , if you take
sample value upto 6 then always LCL is zero.
Page 85
What are the Quality Core Tools
Over 30 years ago, AIAG collaborated with the domestic automotive
manufacturers to develop common quality methods and tools, which
became known as the Quality Core Tools.
5 Core tools is developed by AIAG (Automotive industry action group) in
1993. AIAG have 5 Core tools.
The Quality Core Tools are defined as five supplemental techniques and/or
methods which support the expectations of IATF 16949.
These tools are documented separately through the publication of five
manuals available through Automotive Industry Action Group (AIAG).
Page 86
Why Core tools are important ?
Core quality tools have become one of the foundations for implementation
and maintenance of any QMS (Quality Management System) based on IATF
16949. Together with automotive manufacturers, AIAG (Automotive
Industry Action Group) developed this set of methodologies and techniques
to enhance the effectiveness of the IATF 16949-based QMS, provide high-
quality products, produce the required quantities, and deliver on time.
Example :-
If you are carpenter, you need to have a few basic (core) tools in your
toolbox like a hammer, nails, tape measure, etc. And, you need to know
how to use them.
Quality Core Tools are the five basic statistical tools you need to have in
your toolbox, and once you learn how to use them, you will be well on your
way to IATF 16949 Certification.
Name of the 5 Core tools in serial order with their latest edition till
September 2019
(1) Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) :- 2nd edition publish in
2008
(2) Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) :- 1st edition
FMEA Last edition is 4th edition, but now 4th edition is terminate in
June 2019, In new addition AIAG and VDA (Verband der
Automobilindustrie ) collaborate. And new addition name is given 1st
addition.
(3) Measurement System Analysis (MSA) :- 4th edition published in June
2010
(4) Statistical Process Control (SPC) :- 2nd edition released in July 2005
(5) Production Part Approval Process (PPAP) :- 4th edition released on
1st March 2006
Note :- To see which is current edition of 5 core tools , visit AIAG website.
Because Core tools upgraded time to time.
What is VDA ?
VDA 6.1 is a German quality management system standard. It was
initiated by the automobile industry. The first VDA standard was for the
exchange of surface models, and was named "VDA-FS".
VDA stands for Verband der Automobilindustrie.
Page 87
What is statistical process control (SPC) ?
Definition :- Controlling the process variation by using statistics is
called SPC.
Statistics :-
The set of information derived from the sample data to estimate the
process (Population) are called statistics.
Process :-
Converting an input into output by using Man, Machine, Material,
Method and environment.
Control :-
Ensuring to make a variable to be with in the stated limit.
SPC
SPC is developed by Dr. Walter A. Shewhart during 1920 in Bell Lab.
Statistical Process Control (SPC) :- 2nd edition published in July 2005
Principal of SPC
Basic principal of SPC is to reduce variation.
What is variation ?
One problem with mother nature is , Everything is different, No two
things produces same in the world. By all efforts we can only reduce the
gap between the two. This gap is known as variation.
Page 88
How to find problems in process ?
Mean F ormula :-
Note :- How much our process location is shift from customer location
is tell that how much worst is our process running.
Note (2) :- If our process spread is less than customer spread then our
process is in good condition.
Note (3) :- It is thumb rule that if our process sigma value is less, then
process is running in good condition. Because sigma is process variation.
Page 89
Shape : Histogram
Histogram gives a graphical view of the distribution of the values
It reveals the amount of variation that any process have with in it.
Page 90
Now main SPC start
for X bar - R chart
Calculate process capability (Cp)
Cp = (USL-LSL) / 6σ
or
Cp = Customer specification (Voice of customer )
Process specification (Voice of process )
Note :- 6σ is process specification
Requirement to find Cp ?
To find Cp we have required process sigma only.
Limitations of Cp
Cp shows only spread of the process, It doesn’t show the location of
process.
Page 91
Compare voice of Process with Voice of customer.
Page 92
What is the meaning of Cp = 2 ?
Lets assume our customer tolerance is 1mm and our process tolerance
observed 0.50 mm.
Then cp = Customer tolerance \ process tolerance
= 1 \ 0.50 = 2
Means we have used 50 % of customer tolerance.
σ = Ṝ/d₂
Calculate R (Range)
R = (Maximum value in a subgroup) -(Minimum Value in a subgroup)
Page 93
Note :- There are two types of method to find sigma (σ)
(i) Root mean square method :- RMS method is used to find sigma in
Histogram , control charts, (Pp) Process performance & (Ppk) process
performance index.
(ii) σ = Ṝ/d₂ This method of find sigma is used for Cp and Cpk.
Cpl = ( - LSL ) / 3σ
Page 94
Calculation for example
Suppose drawing dimension is 10±0.30 so USL = 10.30 & LSL = 9.70
Suppose process sigma = 0.1 & Mean ( ) is 10.10
Conclusion :- If our Cpk value lies between 1.33 to 2 then our process
mean is good.
If our Cpk is lies between 1 to 1.33 then immediate action is required.
If our Cpk is less then 1 then our process is in worst condition, stop the
process and take high priority action.
Page 95
Note :-
(i) USL and LSL is customer limit
(ii) CL, UCL and LCL is found from process.
(iii) If UCL and LCL is less then USL and LSL then our process or
material is ok in opposite condition vice versa.
(iv) If process is running on common cause then we calculate Cp and Cpk.
If there is any special cause in our process then we have to first removed
special cause reading from our data.
Sigma Level
Sigma Level Sigma Level Defect opportunity % Yield
(Short term ) (Long term ) (Per million) (Long term)
(Long term )
2 0.5 308,537 69.15%
3 1.5 66,807 93.32%
4 2.5 6,210 99.58%
5 3.5 233 99.98%
6 4.5 3.4 99.99966%
(1) Sigma level is a method to measure process performance.
(2) It shows if process is running on 6 sigma level then PPM is 3.4
Example
If Cpk is 1.33
Then sigma level = 1.33 x 3 = 3.99 or say 4 sigma
4 sigma means process PPM is 6210
Page 96
Difference in process sigma and sigma level ?
(1) Sigma level is process performance. It is good for process if its value
increase.
e.g. if process is running in 6 sigma level then PPM is 3.4 its good.
(2) Process sigma is Process variation. It is bad for process if its value is
increase.
e.g.
Cp = (USL-LSL) / 6σ
(a) lets assume USL - LSL value is 1
and sigma value is 1
then Cp = 1 / 1x6 = 0.166
We already know if Cp is less then 1 its very bad.
(3) The difference in Pp and Ppk we used root mean square method
to find sigma, and in Cp , Cpk we used σ = Ṝ/d₂ method to
find sigma.
(4) In Pp and Ppk there is no need to find Control Charts.
Page 97
(6) In Cp & Cpk we take regular production parts and in Pp , Ppk we
take parts randomly from a lot.
pn, p , c, u charts
Till date we don’t used this charts in industry, this charts is used for
attribute data.
Only Xbar-R chart is used in industry.
With the help of Xbar chart, we control the mean of the process.
and with the help of Rbar chart we control process spread.
Page 98
Exercise of SPC
Sr. No Observation
1 18
2 17
3 18
4 16
5 19
6 16
7 17
8 19
9 15
10 18
Answer
Mean =
S. NO. Observation
1 180
2 170
3 180
4 160
5 190 Formula =
6 160
7 170
8 190
9 150
10 180
Answer
X bar or Mean = 180+170+160+190+160+170+190+150+180 / 10
1730/10 =173
Page 99
√(180-173)²+(170-173)²+(180-173)²+(160-173)²+(190-173)²+
(160-173)²+(170-173)²+(190-173)²+(150-173)²+(180-173)² / 10-1
√(7)²+(-3)²+(7)²+(-13)²+(17)²+(-13)²+(-3)²+(17)²+(-23)²+(7)² / 9
√178.9 = 13.37
CPK
CPU = USL-Mean = 24-22 = 0.833
3σ 3x0.8
CPL = Mean - LSL = 22-18 = 1.67
3σ 3x0.8
In between CPU & CPL which ever is less is CPK so 0.833 is CPK
(4) You have received a lot of 1000 pivot pins , specification length
of pin is 15.0±0.2mm, sample of 50 psc were inspected and mean &
standard deviation was to be 15.05 & 0.1 mm respectively.
calculate how many psc are likely to be rejected from the lot (Use Z Table)
Answer
USL = 15.20 , LSL = 14.80 , Mean = 15.05 , σ = 0.1
Page 100
Put all value in normal distribution
Conclusion
Calculation
We have lot size = 1000 psc
PPM formula = rejection / production x 1000000
Given = rejection x 1000000 = 308537
1000
Rejection = 308537 x 1000 = 308.5 or say 308 psc is reject from lot.
1000000
Page 101
(5) Question
Find CP & CPK from figure
Answer
There is no USL , LSL, UCL & LCL is Given so we have to assume
Page 102
Calculate CPK
CPU = USL - Mean = 10.60 - 10.00 = 0.60 =2
3σ 3 x 0.10 0.30
(6) Question
Find CP & CPK from figure
Answer
There is no USL , LSL, UCL & LCL is Given so we have to assume
Page 103
Put all value in normal distribution
Calculate CPK
CPU = USL - Mean = 10.50 - 10.00 = 0.50 = 1.67
3σ 3 x 0.10 0.30
You already Know between CPU & CPL whichever is less is our CPK
Page 104
(7) Question
Find CP & CPK from figure
(8) Question
Find CP & CPK from figure
Page 105
Some condition for CP and CPK
we assume process mean is 10 and sigma is 0.10 for all cp , cpk condition
If CP is 1
If CP is 1 and CPK is 1
Page 106
Process mean से USL या LSL जिसकी भी कम दुरी होती है उतना हमारा
sigma level होता है
so sigma level is 3 in given figure
Page 107
If CP is 1 and process mean 10.30 in given figure
Conclusion
Page 108
Calculate CP
Cp = sigma/3 = 3/3 = 1
Page 109
Cp = sigma/3 = 4/3 = 1.33
Cp = sigma/3 = 6/3 = 2
Page 110
PLANT: DEPTT. OPERATION : DATE CONTROL LIMITS CALCULATED : ENGINEERING SPECIFICATION 11.80 +/- 2 PART NO
FIXTURE
MACH NO. HP-1 DATE : CHARACTERISTICS : CO-ORDINATE DIMENSION ( PT. 5) SAMPLE SIZE/ FREQUENCY : 05 pcs/lot PART NAME
10.60
(USL-LSL)
2 Cp = 1.532
6s
10.20
= 1.398
2.140
2
1.5
SIZE A2 D3 D4
0.5
2 1.88 0 3.27
0 3 1.02 0 2.57
4 0.73 0 2.28
Date
Time
08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 08.09.05 5 0.58 0 2.11
R
E 1 10.91 12.12 12.31 12.36 11.86 12.21 11.89 12.35 11.41 11.36 11.26 11.85 11.34 11.91 11.36 11.26 11.23 11.41 12.22 11.43 6 0.48 0 2
A
D 2 11.34 11.91 11.52 12.11 11.51 11.23 10.88 11.51 11.85 11.36 11.26 12.35 10.66 12.35 11.23 11.89 11.34 11.17 11.61 11.81 7 0.42 0.08 1.92
3 10.66 12.35 12.25 11.16 12.69 11.11 11.41 11.36 11.26 11.76 11.34 11.91 11.52 12.35 11.11 11.12 11.44 12.14 11.26 12.12 8 0.37 0.14 1.86
N
G 4 11.32 11.34 11.85 11.68 12.05 11.89 11.34 11.91 11.11 11.85 12.02 12.35 12.25 11.91 11.89 11.51 12.09 11.32 11.34 11.10 9 0.34 0.18 1.82
S 5 11.25 11.41 11.36 11.26 12.11 11.88 10.66 12.35 11.89 10.82 11.91 11.51 11.36 11.26 11.85 12.35 11.66 11.14 11.64 11.42 10 0.31 0.22 1.78
SUM 0.00 55.48 59.13 59.29 58.57 60.22 58.32 56.18 59.48 57.52 57.15 57.79 59.97 57.13 59.78 57.44 58.13 57.76 57.18 58.07 57.88 THE PROCESS MUST BE IN
SUM
X = NO OF READINGS
#DIV/0! 11.10 11.83 11.86 11.71 12.04 11.66 11.24 11.90 11.50 11.43 11.56 11.99 11.43 11.96 11.49 11.63 11.55 11.44 11.61 11.58 CONTROL BEFORE CAPABILITY
R = HIGHEST
LOWEST
-
0.68 1.01 0.95 1.20 1.18 1.10 1.23 0.99 0.78 1.03 0.76 0.84 1.59 1.09 0.78 1.23 0.86 1.00 0.96 1.02
0.00 CAN BE DETERMINED
Page 111
MSA :- MSA stands for measurement system analysis.
Current edition of MSA is 4th edition released on June 2010, till October
2019 this edition is running.
Introduction :-
What is measurement ?
To measure anything with Attribute or Variable method.
Page 112
Why there is need of MSA ?
There are many types of variation
MSA study is done for decease the rejection which is generated due
measurement system error.
Page 113
What is Adequate discrimination ?
Ability to measuring the smallest difference
e.g. Least count of instrument should be 1/10th of Drawing tolerance
or if it is 1/10th of process tolerance then its very good.
Page 114
Example :-
There are 4 combination of accuracy and precision is given below
Example :-
Shop floor person checked a part.
Observed value = 9.99-10.03
Same part checked by standard room person
Reference value = 9.98-10.02
Spread of both are 0.04 but location is changed.
Page 115
Display measurement system precision error with figure
Example :-
Shop floor person checked a part. ( Location or Center is 10 )
Observed value = 9.98-10.02
Same part checked by standard room person
Reference value = 9.99-10.01
Location of both part is same but spread is changed, Its called precision
error.
(b) Accepted a bad part as good part (called type-2 error or beta error)
Page 116
(2) Effect on process control.
(a) Calling a common cause as special cause.
(b) Calling a special cause as common cause.
Page 117
Points to be considered before attribute MSA
(1) Numbered all the parts.
(2) Identify the person from those who operate the gauge
(3) Give one part to one person in random order (such a way that the
person should not be able to know the no.)
(4) Then give all parts to different person in different order.
(5) Repeat the steps and record the result.
Page 118
Probability method for attribute
In this method we have taken 3 trial and 2 inspector, and take 20 parts
(minimum required 12 parts)
Inspector should from final inspection (because after final inspection parts
are going to customer end)
In this 20 samples. We have taken 12 parts are good and 8 parts are bad.
Total decision = 60
Total wrong (false) decision = False alarm + Total miss = 4+7 = 11
Total ok (correct) decision = 60-11 = 49
Total false alarm = 4
Total miss = 7
Page 119
Total opportunity of false alarm =
No. of times good status in true value x No. of trial
.= 12 x 3 = 36
Probability method
Effectiveness (.E) = Total correct decision = 49/60 = 0.81
Total decision
Result :-
our E is = 0.81 so it is marginal, need improvement action.
Our Pfa is = 0.11 is unacceptable
Our Pm is = 0.29 is unacceptable
Page 120
KAPPA method for attribute
Page 121
True status
Add
Bad Good
① ② ①+②
Final inspector
④ ③ ④+③
Pe =
Total no. of correct decision in expected count / Total decision
Page 122
(2) What is Reproducibility ?
With same measurement instrument, different inspector (2 or 3) checked a
single part at same location one time, The difference in the variations of
average is called Reproducibility.
Page 123
STANDARD ACCAPTANCE PERCENTAGE OF GRR
Less then 10% is acceptable
10% to 30% may be acceptable with justification
Greater then 30% need improvement.
NDC (No. of distinct categories) required minimum 5.
Example :-
outer dia is given = 10±0.01 (means 20 micron tolerance given )
Page 124
(2) If we check this dia with Digital Vernier caliper then
Digital Vernier caliper least count is 0.01 or say 10 micron
So We check only
9.99mm, 10mm and 10.01mm, we cant check 10.009 and 9.995mm,
because Digital Vernier caliper not check it.
So in this distinct category is 3 or say NDC = 3
(3) Bias
Bias is the difference between reference value and observed value
Bias is also called error
Note :- Instruments calibration report have Bias mentioned.
Page 125
What is observed value, Reference value ?
(1) Observed value :- Value taken by operator or shop floor inspector on
shop floor with shop floor instrument is called observed value.
If zero lies between lower limit and upper limit then bias is acceptable
Example :- Lower limit (L) = -0.2 & Upper limit (U) = 0.2
Zero lies between L & U, hence bias is acceptable.
(4) Linearity
It is the change of Bias with respect to different measurement range of the
equipment.
Linearity can be in increasing order or in decreasing order.
If bias is found zero at every measurement range then our instrument is
linear
Note :- It is not necessary that Bias is present then linearity also present.
But if bias not present then linearity also not present.
Example :-
lets assume a Vernier of 200mm is used in shop floor.
and bias value changed at different range e.g.
Page 126
Reference
Trials value at Observed value Bias
different range
1 40.00 40.01 0.1
2 80.00 80.02 0.2
3 120.00 120.03 0.3
4 160.00 160.04 0.4
5 200.00 200.05 0.5
There is increasing order linearity present or constant linearity.
Page 127
GAUGE REPEATABLITY & REPRODUCIBLITY WITH PART VARIATION
SUPPLIER NAME/ CODE:- AQE TRAININGS (10 PARTS, 3 APPRAISERS & 3 TRIALS)
WRITE ONLY IN YELLOW CELLS/ BLUE CELLS AS OTHER CELLS ARE LOCKED.
GAGE NO. : MM- 02 PART NO. & NAME : RIVET HOOD LATCH MSA Variable Type
GAGE NAME : Micro Meter CHARACTERSTIC : OUTER DIA DATE 04-May-2018
GAGE L.COUNT : 0.01 MM SPECIFICATIONS: 2.5 +0.15/+0.05 PERFORMED BY : Anshul Kumar
0.01000
0.02500 0.02500
0.01000
0.01000
Schecule Date : …………………………………………..
CHART 0.01500
Series1
0.01000 0.01000
0.01000
0.01000
AVG 2.6343 2.6343 2.6343 2.6343 2.6343 2.6343 2.6343 2.6343 2.6343 2.6343
UCL 2.6449 2.6449 2.6449 2.6449 2.6449 2.6449 2.6449 2.6449 2.6449 2.6449
LCL 2.6238 2.6238 2.6238 2.6238 2.6238 2.6238 2.6238 2.6238 2.6238 2.6238
AVG 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103 0.0103
UCL 0.0266 0.0266 0.0266 0.0266 0.0266 0.0266 0.0266 0.0266 0.0266 0.0266
LCL 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Page 128
Doc.No:-F/QA/07 Rev.No:-00 Efft Date:-01/01/17
What is FMEA ?
FMEA stands for Failure Mode and Effect Analysis
It is a team oriented, systematic method Which evaluate the potential
technical risk of failure of a product or process, Analyze the cause and
effects of those failures, and recommended action to reduces the risk.
History of FMEA
(a) First developed in 1949-1950's by US Military as MIL-P-1629
(b) Proper used by NASA in 1963 in Apollo project as FMECA
(c.) Ford was the first automotive company using FMEA in 1977.
(d) Used as FMEA (DIN 25448) by Germans as a part of VDA
(e.) Incorporated by the ''Big Three" Automotive Industry Action Group
(AIAG) and American society for Quality Control copyright standards
in 1993 and used by many more industry sectors
(f) Published AIAG fourth edition 2008
(g) Published first edition jointly by AIAG VDA 1st June, 2019
(VDA - Verband der automobilindustrie )
When to do FMEA ?
(1) New technology / Processes
(2) ECN (Process, Customer/law requirements, Quality issue, HARA and
TARA etc.)
HARA :- Hazards and risk analysis
Hazards is threat which effect human life and health is called hazards
Benefits of PFMEA
Direct improvement :- Indirect improvements :-
(1) Quality (1) Regularity compliances
(2) Reliability (2) Strong communication
(3) Safety (3) Reduction in wastages
(4) Manufacturability
(5) Reducing cost
Limitations of PFMEA
(1) It is qualitative (subjective), not quantative (measurable)
(2) It relies on team's level of knowledge which may, or may not predict
future performance.
Steps of FMEA
New FMEA have 7 steps
(1) Planning and preparation
(2) Structure Analysis
(3) Function Analysis
(4) Failure Analysis
(5) Risk Analysis
(6) Optimization
(7) Results Documentation
Page 130
Major changes in Format - Header
Key date :- Removed
Prepared By :- Removed
Fmea date (Orig) :- Change to start date
① CFT :- Before Core team word is used Now Cross functional team
word is used and now core team + extended team is part of CFT.
(1) Business use :- This document will showed to our business relation
persons, Auditors also included in it.
(2) Proprietary use :- We will not showed this document to customer,
auditor or anyone, we will take patent for it, we only showed patent to
customer.
(3) Confidential use :- This document will showed to only those with we
have signed the agreement.
Page 131
What is base line PFMEA ?
Lets assume we make a forging process PFMEA, Which have already a
similar process PFMEA is available.
If we given the reference of already available PFMEA in new part which
have same forging process then this PFMEA is called base line PFMEA
Continuous Improvement
* Issue
* Reflects the change history and Authorization
All the seven step is different / extended and new from old PFMEA.
In new one we get AP (action priority) from SOD and RPN is removed in
new format.
Severity
In old revision we have 2 points available :-
(1) Impact to your plant
(2) Impact to ship plant (when known)
In new PFMEA new point is added :- (1) and (2) point is same
new point (3) is added
(3) Impact on end user (when known)
Occurrence
Before to calculating occurrence there is one method available :- calculate
with PPM.
In new revision there are three different types of occurrence rating criteria
available.
We can use any-one from them, as per requirement
PPM rating method is same but rating criteria is changed.
Detection
Detection rating method is same but rating criteria is changed.
Page 132
FMEA 7 steps in detail :-
Page 133
(2) FMEA timing :- When is this due ?
Advanced Plan and Define Product Design & Process Design & Product & Feedback
Product Program Development Development Verification Process Assessmen
Quality Verification Validation t&
Planning Corrective
(APQP) Actions
Phases
DFMEA Start FMEA Planning Start DFMEA when Complete DFMEA Complete Start again
in concept phase the design concept is analysis prior to release DFMEA with
before product well understood of design specification actions DFMEA
development begins for quotation prior to and
Information flow production PFMEA
from DFMEA to tooling. planning if
PFMEA PFMEA The Start PFMEA when Complete PFMEA Complete there are
DFMEA and the production concept analysis prior to final PFMEA changes to
PFMEA should be is well understood process decisions. actions existing
executed during the prior to design or
same time period to PPAP. process.
allow optimization of
both the product and
process design
Page 134
Step 2 - Structural Analysis
1. Process item :- PFD have different types of process are process item.
Example :- operation 30 - forging, operation 40 - plating are different
process item.
2. Process step :- The sub-process which is part of process item is called
process step.
Example :- Plating is process item and Cleaning , rinse, base coat, final
coat is process steps.
3. Process work element :- In this minimum 4M included.
Example :- Men, Machine, Material, Environment. Other two
measurement and method are not compulsory.
In men - supervisor is not included.
In material - Indirect material included e.g. plating chemical, coolant,
grease, oil, welding rod etc.
In environment - Generally 6 environment condition considered.
(1) Temperature (2) Humidity (3) Lux level (4) Noise (5) Dust
(6) Electromagnetic field
Page 135
Function :- What process step is intended to do
* Use action verb
* Should be in present tense
Characteristics is :-
* Performance of process function
* Product / Process characteristics
* Legal requirement
* Customer requirement
* Internal requirement
Page 136
Failure effect on
* Next operation
* Customer
* Logestive body
* Inhouse more scrap
* End user - Feel / Hear / Smell
Failure causes
Typically failure causes may include the classic Ishikawa's 4M, but are
not limited to:
(1) Man :- Set-up worker, machine operator / associate, material
associate, maintenance technician etc.
(2) Machine/Equipment : Robot , injection molding machine, inspection
devices, fixtures and many more.
(3) Material (Indirect) : machining oil, installation grease, washer, etc.
(4) Environment : Heat, dust, lighting, noise etc.
Page 137
Step 5 - Risk Analysis
Risk Analysis
Since the AP table was designed to work with the severity, occurrence and
detection tables provided in the manual.
If the organization choose to modify the S,O,D tables for specific
products, process or project, The AP table should also be carefully
reviewed and modified if necessary
Risk Analysis
Page 138
(3) Priority Low (L) : Low priority for action
The team may identify actions to improve prevention or detection
control.
Step 6 - Optimization
Assignment of Responsibilities
(1) Each action should have a responsible individual and a target
completion date.
(2) The responsible person ensure the action status is updated, if the action
is confirmed this person is also responsible for the action implementation.
(3) Target completion date should be realistic.
Page 139
Status of the Actions
Suggested levels for status of actions
(1) Open :- No action defined
(a) Decision pending (optional) :- The action has been defined but has
not yet decided on . A decision paper is being created.
(b) Implementation pending (Optional) :- The action has been decided
on
but not yet implemented.
(2) Completed :- Completed action have been implemented and their
effectiveness has been demonstrated and documented. A final evolution
has been done.
(3) Not completed :- Not completed status assigned when a decision to
made not to implement an action. This may occur when risk related to
practical and technical limitations are beyond current capabilities.
Continual improvement
The PFMEA serves the historical records for the process. Therefor the
original severity, occurrence and detection number need to be visible in
history of PFMEA.
Page 140
PROCESS FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS PROCESS FAILURE MODE AND EFFECT ANALYSIS
Planning & Preparation (STEP1)
Company Name: Subject: PFMEA AID Number:
Plant location: PFMEA Start Date: Process Responsibility:
Customer Name: PFMEA Revision Date: Confidentiality Level:
Model/Year/Platform: Cross Functional Team:
CONTINUOUS
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS (STEP 2) FUNCTION ANALYSIS (STEP3) FAILURE ANALYSIS (STEP 4) RISK ANALYSIS (STEP 5) OPTIMIZATION (STEP 6)
IMPROVEMEN
T
Special Characteristics
Filter Code (Optional)
Occurrence (O) of FC
1. Process 1. Function of 2. Function of
2. Process
FMEA AP (Action
Severity (s) of FE
Special Product
Item the Process the Process 2. Failure
Occurrence (O)
Characteristics
Detection (D)
Step 3. Function of the 3. Failure Current
PFMEA AP
Severity (s)
History/ Change 3. Process Work Item Step and Mode Current Action
Remarks
ISSUE #
Priority)
Process Work 1. Failure Causes Detection Responsible Target
Authorization System, Element (Function of Product (FM) of Prevention Prevention Detection Taken (with Completion
Station No. Element and Effects (FC) of the Controls Person's Completion Status
(As Applicable) Subsystem, System, Characteristic the Control (PC) Action Action date pointer to date
and Name of Process (FE) Work (DC) of FC Name
(optional) Part Element 4M Type Subsystem, s (Quantitative Process of FC evidence
Process Characteristics Element or FM
or Name of Part Element Value is Step
Step
Process or process) Optional)
Page 141
Process General Evaluation Criteria Severity (S)
Potential Failure Effects rated according to the criteria below
Impact to Ship to plant Impact to End User
S Effect Impact to Your Plant
(When Known) (When Known)
Failure may result in an Failure may result in an Affects safe operation of the
10
acute health and/or safety risk acute health and/or safety risk vehicle and/ or other
High
failure may result in in-plant for the may result in in-plant noncompliance with
failure
9
regulatory non-compliance regulatory non-compliance regulations
100% of production run Line shutdown grater than full Loss of primary vehicle
8
Modera affected may have to be production shift; stopped function necessary for
high scrapped.
Product may have to be sorted Line shutdown from one hour Degradation of primary
7
and a portion( less than up to full production shift; vehicle function necessary
100% of the production run Line shutdown up to one hour Loss of secondary vehicle
6
may have to reworked offline function
Modera A portion of production run Less than 100% of product Degradation of secondary
5 affected; strong possibility for vehicle function
may have to be reworked
100% of production run may Defective product triggers Very objectionable
4 significant reaction plan;
have to be reworked in appearance, sound, vibration,
a portion of production run additional
Defective product triggers Moderately objectionable
3 minor reaction plan;
may have to be reworked in appearance, sound,
Low additional
Slight inconvenience to Defective product triggers no Slightly objectionable
2 process, operation or operator reaction plan; additional appearance, sound,
Very defective
No discernible effect or no
1 No discerning effect No discernible effect
effect
Page 142
Occurrence potential (O) for the process
Potential Failure Causes rated according to the criteria below. Consider Prevention Controls when determining
the best Occurrence estimate, Occurrence is predictive qualitative rating made at the time of evaluation and
may not reflect the actual occurrence. The occurrence rating number is relative rating within the scope of
FMEA (process being evaluated). For Prevention Controls with multiple Occurrence Ratings, use the rating
that best reflects the robustness of the control.
Prediction
of failure Type of controls
O Prevention controls
cause
occurring
Extremely None No prevention control.
10
High
9 Behavioral Prevention control will have little effect in preventing failure cause
Very high
8
7 Behavioral or Prevention control somewhat effective in preventing failure cause
High
6 technical
5 Prevention control are effective in preventing failure cause
Moderate
4
3 Low Best practices: Prevention control are highly effective in preventing failure cause
2 Very Low Behavioral or
technical
Technical Prevention control are extremely effective in preventing failure cause from
Extremely occurring due to design ( e.g. part geometry) or process (e.g. fixture of
1
Low tooling design). Intent of prevention controls- failure mode cannot be
physically produced due to the failure cause.
Page 143
Occurrence potential (O) for the process (ALT1)
Potential Failure Causes rated according to the criteria below. Consider Prevention Controls when
determining the best Occurrence estimate, Occurrence is predictive qualitative rating made at the time of
evaluation and may not reflect the actual occurrence. The occurrence rating number is relative rating within
the scope of FMEA (process being evaluated). For Prevention Controls with multiple Occurrence Ratings,
use the rating that best reflects the robustness of the control.
Type of controls
O Incidents per 100 item/vehicles Prevention controls
10 >=100 per thousands 1/=1 in 10 None No prevention control.
9 50 per thousands 1 in 20 Behavioral Prevention control will have little effect in
8 20 per thousands 1 in 50 preventing failure cause
7 10 per 1000 1 in 100 Behavioral or Prevention control somewhat effective in
6 2 per thousand 1 in 500 technical preventing failure cause
5 .5 per thousand 1 in 2000 Prevention control are effective in preventing
4 .1 per thousand 1 in 10000 failure cause
3 .01 per thousand 1 in 100000 Best practices: Prevention control are highly effective in
<.001 per thousand 1 in 1000000 Behavioral or preventing failure cause
2
technical
Failure is eliminated through Technical Prevention control are extremely effective in
prevention control preventing failure cause from occurring due
to design ( e.g. part geometry) or process (e.g.
1
fixture of tooling design). Intent of prevention
controls- failure mode cannot be physically
produced due to the failure cause.
Page 144
Occurrence potential (O) for the process (time based failure prediction value) (ALT2)
Potential Failure Causes rated according to the criteria below. Consider Prevention Controls when determining
the best Occurrence
Time based failure cause Type of controls
O Prevention controls
prediction
10 Every time None No prevention control.
9 Almost every time Prevention control will have little effect in preventing
Behavioral failure
8 More than once per shift
7 More than once per day Prevention control somewhat effective in preventing
6 More than once per week Behavioral or failure
5 More than once per month technical Prevention control are effective in preventing failure
4 More than once per year cause
3 Once per year Best practices: Prevention control are highly effective in preventing
2 Less than once per year Behavioral or failure
Prevention control are extremely effective in preventing
1 Never Technical
Page 145
Detection potential (D) for the validation of the process design
Detection control rated according to detection method, maturity and opportunity for detection
Ability to Detection method
D Opportunity for detection
maturity
No testing or inspection
10 method has been the failure mode will not or cannot be detected
established or is known
Very Low
It is unlikely that the
The failure mode is not easily detected through random or sporadic
9 testing or inspection
audits
method will detect the
Testing or inspection human inspection (visual, tactile, audible), or use of manual
8 method has not been gauging ( attribute or variable) that should detect the failure mode
Low proven to be effective and or
Machine based detection ( automated or semi automated with
7
notification by light, buzzer, etc.) or use of inspection equipment
Test or inspection method human inspection (visual, tactile, audible), or use of manual
6 has been proven to be gauging ( attribute or variable) that will detect the failure mode or
Moderate effective and
Machine based detection (semi automated with notification by
5
light, buzzer, etc.), or use of inspection equipment such as co-
System has been proven Machine based automated detection method that will detect failure
4
to be effective and mode downstream, prevent further processing or system will
reliable (e.g. Plant has Machine based automated detection method that will detect failure
3 mode in-station, prevent further processing or system will
High
Detection method has
Machine based detection method that will detect the cause and
2 been proven effective and
prevent the failure mode (discrepant part) from being produced
reliable (e.g.. Plant
Failure mode cannot be physically produced as design or process or detection method proven
1 Very high
to always detect the failure mode or failure cause
Page 146
Action Priority (AP) for DFMEA and PFMEA
Action priority is based on combinations of Saverty, Occurrence and Detection ratings in Blank until filled
order to prioritize actions for risk reduction. in by user.
Prediction of ACTION
Effect S Failure cause O Ability to Detect D PRIORITY Comments
occurring (AP)
Low - Very low 7-10. H
Moderate 5-6. H
Very high 8-10.
High 2-4. H
Very High 1 H
Low - Very low 7-10. H
Moderate 5-6. H
High 6-7.
High 2-4. H
Product or
Very High 1 H
Plant
9 - 10. Low - Very low 7-10. H
effect
Moderate 5-6. H
Very High Moderate 4-5.
High 2-4. H
Very High 1 M
Low - Very low 7-10. H
Moderate 5-6. M
Low 2-3.
High 2-4. L
Very High 1 L
Very Low 1 Very high - Very low 1-10. L
Page 147
Action Priority (AP) for DFMEA and PFMEA
Action priority is based on combinations of Saverty, Occurrence and Detection ratings in Blank until filled
order to prioritize actions for risk reduction. in by user.
Prediction of ACTION
Effect S Failure cause O Ability to Detect D PRIORITY Comments
occurring (AP)
Low - Very low 7-10. H
Moderate 5-6. H
Very high 8-10.
High 2-4. H
Very High 1 H
Low - Very low 7-10. H
Moderate 5-6. H
High 6-7.
High 2-4. H
Product or
Very High 1 M
Plant
7 - 8. Low - Very low 7-10. H
effect
Moderate 5-6. M
High Moderate 4-5.
High 2-4. M
Very High 1 M
Low - Very low 7-10. M
Moderate 5-6. M
Low 2-3.
High 2-4. L
Very High 1 L
Very Low 1 Very high - Very low 1-10. L
Page 148
Action Priority (AP) for DFMEA and PFMEA
Action priority is based on combinations of Saverty, Occurrence and Detection ratings in Blank until filled
order to prioritize actions for risk reduction. in by user.
Prediction of ACTION
Effect S Failure cause O Ability to Detect D PRIORITY Comments
occurring (AP)
Low - Very low 7-10. H
Moderate 5-6. H
Very high 8-10.
High 2-4. M
Very High 1 M
Low - Very low 7-10. M
Moderate 5-6. M
High 6-7.
High 2-4. M
Product or
Very High 1 L
Plant
4 - 6. Low - Very low 7-10. M
effect
Moderate 5-6. L
Moderate Moderate 4-5.
High 2-4. L
Very High 1 L
Low - Very low 7-10. L
Moderate 5-6. L
Low 2-3.
High 2-4. L
Very High 1 L
Very Low 1 Very high - Very low 1-10. L
Page 149
Action Priority (AP) for DFMEA and PFMEA
Action priority is based on combinations of Saverty, Occurrence and Detection ratings in Blank until filled
order to prioritize actions for risk reduction. in by user.
Prediction of ACTION
Effect S Failure cause O Ability to Detect D PRIORITY Comments
occurring (AP)
Low - Very low 7-10. M
Moderate 5-6. M
Very high 8-10.
High 2-4. L
Very High 1 L
Low - Very low 7-10. L
Moderate 5-6. L
High 6-7.
High 2-4. L
Product or Very High 1 L
Plant 2 - 3. Low - Very low 7-10. L
effect Low Moderate 5-6. L
Moderate 4-5.
High 2-4. L
Very High 1 L
Low - Very low 7-10. L
Moderate 5-6. L
Low 2-3.
High 2-4. L
Very High 1 L
Very Low 1 Very high - Very low 1-10. L
No
Very Low - Very
discrinible 1 1 - 10. Very high - Very low 1 - 10. L
High
Effect
Page 150
Automobile industry is divided in 4 types of category.
1st case :- Customer does not given drawing to supplier for production.
only given requirements to supplier.
In this case supplier generate product design and makes production process.
2nd case :- In this case customer gives part drawing to supplier, and part is
produce as per drawing.
Page 151
What is production tooling sample and prototype sample ?
Prototype sample :-
It is generate before PPAP submission or development time.
In this case sample is produce in TOOL ROOM condition, where
manufacturer have tooling is not available, so he made parts in tool room
for actual requirements meet before purchasing tooling.
Page 152
What is PPAP?
PPAP stands for Production Part Approval Process (PPAP)
A set of Activities that must be completed prior to making the first
shipment.
PPAP is a part of Advance Product Quality Planning (APQP), therefore
while carrying out PPAP, a cross functional APQP approach is
recommended.
Standard used to formally reduce risks prior to product or service release,
in a team oriented manner using well established tools and techniques
AIAG’s 4th edition effective June 1, 2006 is the most recent version
PPAP has now spread to many different industries beyond automotive
Still till September 2019 4th edition is continued.
Purpose of PPAP
Provide evidence that all customer engineering design record and
specification requirements are properly understood by the supplier.
Page 153
We do not give PPAP at development time, because at this stage we have
not fixed 4M e.g. operation standard, dies, fixture etc.
PPAP is given in actual run condition, In this condition we have fixed our
process for production , and fixed it for mass production then we submit
PPAP to customer.
At the stage of PPAP, cycle time for production is fixed.
PPAP is production trial run, It is the activity which is done before mass
production.
Page 154
(b) Production material :-
Production material have two categories
(1) Standard Part
(2) Customize part.
Page 155
(8) Inactive production from 12 months or more :- If customer / supplier
not produce part from 12 months or more then PPAP submission required.
(9) Fit function change :- If customer changes part fit function then it is
mandatory to take re-approval of PPAP.
(10) Inspection instrument / method change :- Also mandatory to take
approval from customer.
(11) Bulk material source or grade change :- Customer approval required.
(12) Change in product appearance attributes :- It is mandatory where AAR
is required, in this case customer approval required.
PPAP is required with any significant change to product or process
Production Run
PPAP data must be submitted from a production run using:
Page 156
PPAP process requirement.
Significant production run :-
(1) For production parts, Products for PPAP shall be taken from a
significant production run.
(a) This production run shall be from one hours to eight hours of
production
(b) and with the specific production quantity to total a minimum of 300
consecutive parts. unless otherwise specified by the authorized customer
quality representative.
(2) The run shall be manufactured at the production site using the tooling,
gauging, process, materials and operators from the production environment.
Page 157
List of Official PPAP Requirements
(1) Design Records
(2) Authorized Engineering Change Documents
(3) Customer Engineering Approval, if required
(4) Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA)
(5) Process Flow Diagram
(6) Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (PFMEA)
(7) Control Plan
(8) Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA)
(9) Dimensional Results
(10) Records of Material / Performance Test Results
(11) Initial Process Studies
(12) Qualified Laboratory Documentation
(13) Appearance Approval Report (AAR)
(14) Sample Production Parts
(15) Master Sample
(16) Checking Aids
(17) Customer-Specific Requirements
(i) Packing standard
(ii) Logistics requirement and etc.
(18) Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
and Bulk material checklist, (officially AIAG not given it the name of 19th
document name but some minded person say it is 19th document.
Definition of Risk
(1) High Risk
(a) Parts associated with multiple critical features, complex design, or high
end technology that is not yet established in the general manufacturing
environment
(b) Supplier’s quality system and/or quality performance is not to customer
satisfaction
Page 158
Submission Level Requirements
New Parts
(1) Level 2 is required for Low Risk Parts
(2) Level 3 is required for Medium and High Risk Parts
Part Changes
(1) Level 3 is required for Parts produced at a new or additional location
(2) Supplier Quality Excellence will define the level required for all other
changes
Customer reserves the right to redefine the submission level required
PPAP Status
Approved
(a) The part meets all customer requirements
(b) Supplier is authorized to ship production quantities of the part
Interim Approval
Permits shipment of part on a limited time or piece quantity basis
Rejected
The part does not meet customer requirements, based on the production lot
from which it was taken and/or accompanying documentation
Record retention
According to AIAG manual :- Production part approval records, regardless
of submission level, shall be maintained for the Length of time that the
part is active plus one Calendar year.
(iii) General parts :- Those parts which failure not cause more effect.
Page 159
Some OEM have different retention period of safety , fundamental and
general parts,
generally safety and fundamental parts have more retention period than
general parts,
Page 160
PPAP submission level requirements :-
Submission Level
Sr. Level Level Level Level Level
Requirements
No. 1 2 3 4 5
1 Design record R S S * R
(A) For proprietary
R R R * R
components / details
(B) For all other
R S S * R
components / details
Engineering change
2 R S S * R
documents, if any
Customer engineering
3 R R S * R
approval, if required
4 Design FMEA R R S * R
5 PFD R R S * R
6 PFMEA R R S * R
7 Control Plan R R S * R
8 MSA R R S * R
9 Dimensional result R S S * R
Material, performance
10 R S S * R
test result
11 Initial process study R R S * R
Qualified laboratory
12 R S S * R
documentation.
13 AAR (Appearance approval report) S S S * R
14 Sample product R S S * R
15 Master Sample R R R * R
16 Checking Aids R R R * R
17 CSR Customer specific requirement R R S * R
18 PSW (Part submission warrant) S S S S R
Bulk material
S S S S R
checklist
S = The organization shall submit documents to the customer and retain a
copy of records or documentation items at appropriate locations.
R = The organization shall retain documents at appropriate locations and
make available to the customer upon request.
* = The organization shall retain documents at appropriate locations and
submit to the customer upon request.
Page 161
P P A P D o c u m e n ts - R e q u ire d / S u b m itte d (Optional)
Enter Customer Requested documents in "Required" column and Yes or No in the "Submitted"
column. Comments may be added for explanation of submission.
Sr.
Documents Required Submitted Comments
no.
1 Design Records - -
- for proprietary components/details
- for all other components/details
2 Engineering Change Documents - if any
3 Customer Engineering Approval - if any
4 Design FMEA
5 Process Flow Chart
6 Process FMEA
7 Control Plan
8 Measurement System Analysis Studies
9 Dimensional Results
10 Material Test Results
11 Capability Study (for Key characteristics / cavity)
12 Qualified Laboratory Documentations (Internal & External)
13 Appearance Approval Report (AAR) - if applicable
15 Master Sample
16 Checking Aids
Records of Compliance with Customer Specific-Specific
17
Requirements
18 Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
Bulk Material Checklist (See 4.1 on AIAG PPAP manual)
19 Gauge List
20 Sub-suppliers List (used for secondary processes)
21 Packaging Data Sheet
22 Barcode Label
23 MSDS Report
24 X-Ray Report for Die Cast parts (per ASTM E505)
25 Performance Test Results
26 APQP / Project Planning Timeline
27 ------Empty Field for additional items------- -
28 ------Empty Field for additional items------- -
29 ------Empty Field for additional items------- -
30 ------Empty Field for additional items------- -
Page 162
(1) Design Record :-
The supplier shall have design records for the product (e.g. Drawing given
by customer or design approved by customer) including design for
or details of saleable parts.
When design records in electric format, produce a hard copy.
Note :-
(i) Regardless of design responsibility there will be only one design record.
(ii) Design record may refer other documents making them part of design
record.
Page 163
AQE training & HR consultancy Design Record
PART NUMBER : 12345 DATE of Origin : 23.03.14
REV NO: 00 PREPARED By / Team (Name & Sign) : Pankaj Kesar
PART DESCRIPTION : Banjo APPROVED By (Name & Sign) : Pintu Kesar
PFD NUMBER : AQE/PFD/12345
Page 164
(2) Authorized Engineering Change Documents
Lets assume
Customer issue an ECN to supplier through mail but the same ECN is
not implemented in customer drawing then before supply the part to
customer, supplier attach ECN copy. This ECN copy is called Authorized
engineering change document.
Format used
Page 165
(3) Customer Engineering Approval, if required
What is deviation ?
Any approval from customer, regarding change in part dimension is called
deviation.
Format used
MOM
MOM stands for minutes of meeting
MOM also known as protocol or note, minutes are the live written record
of a meeting between customer & supplier or internal etc.
They include the list of attendees, issues raised, related responses, and final
decisions taken to address the issues.
Their purpose is to record what actions have been assigned to whom,
along with the achievements and the deadlines to complete task.
Page 166
Doc.No:- AQE/MR/37
AQE Training & HR Consultancy Rev.No:-01
MINUTES OF MEETING Efft date:- 01/9/2019
Date: MEETING VENUE :-
Purpose: Members Present
Customer end Sign Supplier end Sign
1 1
2 2
Meeting with M/s: 3 3
4 4
5 5
S. Target Review by &
Points Discussed Action Proposed Resp. Remarks
No. date Date
Prepared By :-
Page 167
(4) Design Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (DFMEA)
Applicable only For design responsible supplier, The supplier who makes
own drawing for part production. ( In compliance with CSR)
95% supplier are not made their own drawing, they all get drawings from
customer so in 95% companies this document is not applicable.
History
DFMEA was first used in rocket science. Initially, the rocket development
process in the 1950’s did not go well. Design FMEA provided the rocket
scientists with a platform to prevent failure.
What is DFMEA ?
DFMEA is a methodical approach used for identifying potential risks
introduced in a new or changed design of a product/service.
Page 168
What is Control Plan ?
(^) A document that describes how to control the critical inputs to
continue to meet customer expectations of the output.
(^) A control plan is written description of the system for controlling parts
and processes.
(^) It is an internal part of an overall quality process and is to be utilized as
living document.
(^) In effect, it describes the action required at each phase of the process
including receiving, in-process, out-going and the periodic requirements.
NOTE :-
Since processes are expected to be continuously updated and improved,
the control plan is a living document!
Page 169
Benefits of control plan
(1) Quality :-
(i) It reduces waste and improves the quality of products during design,
manufacturing and assembly.
(ii) Control plan identify process characteristics and identify the control
methods for the source of variation.
(2) Customer satisfaction :-
Helps in reducing cost without sacrificing quality.
(3) Communication :-
As a living document, it identifies and communicate changes in the
product process characteristics, control method and characteristics
measurement.
Page 170
Reviewer’s Checklist
(i) Use process flow diagram and PFMEA to build the control plan; keep
them aligned
(ii) Controls must be used to be effective. Keep it simple.
(iii) Ensure that the control plan is in the document control system of the
business
(iv) Good control plans address:
(a) All testing requirements - dimensional, material, and performance
(b) All product and process characteristics at every step throughout
the process
(v) The control method should be based on an effective analysis of the
process
Such as SPC, Error Proofing, Inspection, Sampling Plan
(vi) Control plans should reference other documentation
Specifications, tooling, etc.
Page 171
CONTROL PLAN
AQE TRAINING & Doc Ref No
HR
Rev No & Date
CONSULTANCY
Prototype Pre-launch Production Date (Orig.) : Date (Rev.)
Key Contact / Phone :
Control Plan Number: REV NO:
Part Number/Latest Change Level: Core Team : Customer Engg. Approval /Date (if reqd.)
Part Name/Description : Supplier/Plant Approval/Date Customer Quality Approval /Date (if reqd.)
Supplier Plant Name: Supplier Code Other Approval/Date (if reqd.) Other Approval/Date (if reqd.)
Process Characteristics Methods
Part / Machine, Spec
Name / Product / Process Evaluation Sample Reaction
Process Device, Jig, Char.
Operation plan
Number Description Tools for Mfg. No. Product Process Class specification / Measurement
Size Freq.
Responsibility Control Method
Tolerance Technique
Revision History
Sr No Rev No. Date Change Details
Page 172
Page 173
(1) Prototype, Pre-launch, Production
Indicate the appropriate category
(a) Prototype :- A description of the dimensional measurements, material
and performance tests occurring during prototype build.
(b) Pre-launch :- A discretional of the dimensional measurement,
material and performance tests that will occur after Prototype and before
normal production.
(c,) Production :- A comprehensive documentation of product/process
characteristics, process control, tests and measurement systems occurring
during normal production.
Page 174
(9) Organization / Plant Approval date :-
(a) Obtain manufacturing plant approval
(b) If required see appropriate customer specific requirement.
(18) Number
Numbering the each sub-process.
(19) Product :-
Write product characteristics, example - dia, total length etc.
(20) Process :-
Write process characteristics, example - Insert name, Air pressure etc.
Page 175
(21) Special characteristics :-
Some dimension are critical dimension, mentioned in process, or
dimension which affect fit function, safety function are categorized in
special characteristics.
Page 176
(9) Dimensional Results
Page 177
(10) Records of Material / Performance Test Results
Material test result :-
It included material test result with physical, chemical and metallurgical
requirements.
Keep maintain records of MTC with material sub-supplier name, date of
testing.
Any testing which is done In-house, report shall given to customer.
Page 178
Production Part A pproval M aterial Test Results
Results
S. No. Material Specification Certificate Enclosed
OK Not OK
2 SS SS - 304 OK Yes
Tube(17.3.0mm)
Page 179
AQE Trainings & HR consultancy MTC
PART NUMBER : 123456 DATE of Origin : 25.03.19
PREPARED By / Team
REV NO: 01 Pintu Kesar
(Name & Sign) :
APPROVED By (Name &
PART DESCRIPTION : ABC kithe gya C Pankaj Kesar
Sign) :
Note :- In this format we attach MTC & performance test result in PDF format for electronic media.
and when we submit PPAP in hard copy then included this format, with MTC in hard copy.
Page 180
(12) Qualified Laboratory Documentation
To know more about MTC & MTR, see our YouTube video it is also
included in basic course.
Page 181
(13) Appearance Approval Report (AAR)
Separate report of appearance approval report (AAR) for each part must
included if required.
Submit AAR for representative parts to customer locations.
Submit AAR along with PSW at the time of PPAP submission.
It is applicable on Aesthetic parts, In mostly cases it is not applicable
document.
Page 182
Doc. No. :
AQE Training & HR AQE/QA/32
Issue No. : 01
consultancy Date : 26/07/2019
Page : 01 of 01
DATE:- 06/10/2019
PREPARED BY: PINTU KESAR APPROVED BY: PANKAJ KESAR
Page 183
(14) Sample Production Parts
The organization shall provide sample parts as specified by the customer.
Note :-
9th document (DIMENSIONAL REPORT) we have submit to customer.
Dimensional report is made from inspection of the sample parts.
so make sure when you submit sample parts it must have numbering
same as given on dimensional report.
Document used
On a blank sheet, write sample product part is submitted,
(If you actually submitted to customer)
Note :-
(i) Master sample is not submitted to customer.
(ii) Master sample retain at supplier end for future reference.
(iii) In PPAP 15th document we submit part sign off photo to customer
on a specific format.
Page 184
AQE Training & HR Consultancy MASTER SAMPLE
PART NUMBER : 123456 DATE of Origin : 26/09/2019
REV NO: 01 PREPARED By / Team Pintu Kesar
PART DESCRIPTION : ABC APPROVED By:
(Name & Sign) Pankaj Kesar
PFD NUMBER : AQE/PFD/123456 (Name & Sign) :
MASTER SAMPLE
Page 185
(16) Checking Aids
($) Submit part specific checking aids along with PPAP, if required by the
customer.
($) Clarify that all aspects comply with part dimensional requirements.
($) Document all released engineering changes incorporated in checking
aids at the time of submission
($) Carryout preventive maintenance and MSA as per customer
requirements.
Note :-
Some industry used name LIST OF GAUGES instead of CHECKING
AIDS
Page 186
CHECKING AIDS
Part Name: ABC Part No.: 123456
Variable Gauges
Calibration
Sl no Instrument Name Instrument No. Instrument Make Least count
status
1 Vernier Caliper 14258 Mitutoyo 0.01 OK
2 Digital Micrometer 293-821 Mitutoyo 0.01 OK
3 Height Gauge C91020019 Mitutoyo 0.001 OK
5 Profile Projector P1326 Meera Udyog 0.001 OK
6 Bevel Protector 064154 Mitutoyo 5' OK
7 CMM CMM-01 Carl Zeiss 0.0001 OK
Attribute Gauges
Calibration
Sl no Gauge type Gauge code Range Place to be Used
status
1 Receiving Gauge 1 As per drawing Final Inspection OK
Bending
2 2 As per drawing In Process OK
Gauge(8mm)
Bending
3 3 As per drawing In Process OK
Gauge(17.3mm)
4 Ring Gauge 4 20±0.10 In Process OK
5 Snap Gauge 5 25±0.10 In Process OK
Prepared By: Pintu Kesar Approved By: Pankaj Kesar
Page 187
(17) Customer-Specific Requirements
Maintain a record of compliance to all customer specific requirements.
Page 188
Doc. No. :- AQE/PS/01
Rev. No. :- 00
PACKING STANDARD Date :- 20.09.2019
Approved By :-
Part No. :- 123 Customer Name :- Drawing Ref. No. :-
Part Name :- ABC Date :-
Page 189
(18) Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
What is PSW ?
Document required for all newly tooled or revised products in which the
supplier confirms that inspections and tests on production parts show
conformance to customer requirements.
(iv) Verify that all measurement and test result show conformance with
requirement before signing PSW.
Page 190
PPAP Submission Levels
Level 1 Production warrant and Appearance approval report.
Production warrant, product samples and dimensional
Level 2
result submitted to customer.
Production warrant, Product samples and complete
Level 3
supporting data.
Production warrant and other requirement as defined by
Level 4
customer.
Production warrant, product samples and complete
Level 5 supporting data available at the supplier manufacturing
location.
Reviewers Checklist
Must be completely filled out
Must be signed by the supplier
Submitted at the correct revision level
Submitted at the correct submission level
Specify the reason for submission
Page 191
AQE Training & HR Consultancy Part Submission Warrant
Part Name C ust. Part N um ber
MATERIAL REPORTING
Has customer-required Substances of Concern information been reported? Yes No n/a
Subm itted by IMD S or other custom er f orm at: 4
Are polymeric parts identified with appropriate ISO marking codes? Yes No
5
Engineering Change(s) Supplier or Material Source Change
Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, or additional Change in Part Processing
Correction of Discrepancy Parts Produced at Additional Location
Tooling Inactive > than 1 year Other - please specify
SUBMISSION RESULTS
The results for dimensional measurements material and functional tests appearance criteria statistical process package
These results meet all drawing and specification requirements: Yes No
(If "NO" - Explanation Required)
8
I affirm that the samples represented by this warrant are representative of our parts which were made by a process that meets all Production Part
Approval Process Manual 4th Edition Requirements. I further affirm that these samples were produced at the production rate of _______ / ______
hours. I also certify that documented evidence of such compliance is on file and available for review. I have noted any deviation from this
declaration below.
EXPLANATION / COMMENTS:
Customer Signature 10
Print Name Customer Tracking Number (optional
Page 192
Part Submission Warrant (PSW)
The Part Submission Warrant or PSW is a document that summaries the whole ‘PPAP Package’. It
needs to include details such as:
1) Part Information
1. Part Name
i. The part name is the parts official name. This benefits the supplier and the manufacturer by
giving the part a more human name and decreasing the chance of errors for example BENJO, NUT
etc.
1. Part Name on Drawing
i. The part name on the drawing is the part ID written or stamped onto the CUSTOMER drawing
for example 1234
1. Engineering Change Level
i. Will be specified by the CUSTOMER and could include any manufacturing change such as tool
modifications
1. Engineering Change Date
i. The date of these changes
1. Additional Engineering Changes
1. IMDS ID
i. What is the module or IMDS number
5) Reason for Submission
1. There can be many reasons why it is necessary to conduct a PPAP : Page 193
i. Initial Submission
ii. Engineering Changes
iii. Tooling: Transfer, Replacement, Refurbishment, or Additional
iv. Correction of Discrepancy
v. Tool Inactive > 1 Year
vi. Change to Optional Construction or Material
vii. Supplier or Material Source Change
viii. Change in Part Processing
ix. Parts Produced at Additional Location
x. Other (Specify)
6) Requested Submission Level
1. There are different levels of PPAP submission
i. Level 1 – Warrant only submitted to customer
ii. Level 2 – Warrant with product samples and limited supporting data
iii. Level 3 – Warrant with product samples and complete supporting data
iv. Level 4 – Warrant and other requirements as defined by customer
v. Level 5 – Warrant with product samples and complete and complete supporting data reviewed
at suppliers manufacturing location.
7) Submission Results
1. Have you included results for:
i. Dimensional measurements
ii. Material and function tests
iii. Appearance Criteria
iv. Statistical process package
1. Do all the results meet all the design requirements with any concerns noted
2. Mold / Cavity / Production Process ID
8) Declaration
9) Explanations or Comments
1. Comments / Explanations
2. Customer tool tags
3. Signature
4. Date
5. Printed name
6. Phone Number
7. Fax Number
8. Job Title
9. Email
10) Status
1. Sign off by customer
Page 194
What is APQP ?
APQP stands for Advanced Product Quality Planning.
It is a structured method of defining and establishing the steps necessary to
assure that a product satisfies customer. It starts with customer order.
History ?
Advanced product quality planning is a process developed in the late
1980s by a commission of experts who gathered around the 'Big Three' of
the US automobile industry: Ford, GM and Chrysler.
Ford Motor Company published the first Advanced Quality Planning
handbook for suppliers in the early 1980’s.
The current AIAG APQP manual is the 2nd edition, dated 2008.
Goal of APQP ?
To assure that all required steps are completed in time. It is done at NPD.
Benefits of APQP
(1) A common approach throughout supply chain.
(2) Better customer-supplier communication.
(3) Reduced non-value added time and cost of processes.
(4) Increased success on meeting target quality in all areas of the product
life cycle.
When APQP is done ?
(1) For development of ''New Products''
(2) Incorporating major changes in ''Existing Products''
Page 195
What is 1-10-100 Rule
The 1-10-100 rule states that as a product or service moves through the
production system. The cost of correcting an error multiplies by 10.
Activity Cost
Material is correct = 1 rupees
Error is detected at billing stage = 10 rupees
Error detected by customer = 100 rupees
Dissatisfied customer shares the experience with others the cost is 1000rs.
Phase 1 : Plan and Define
Objective :-
(1) To understand customer requirements (Needs & Expectations )
(2) To establish design intent
Page 196
1.1.2 Historical warranty and quality information :- Warranty reports,
Internal quality reports, Customer plant return and rejection, Field return
product analysis etc.
1.1.3 Team experience :- Customer letters and suggestion, Dealer
comments, Field service reports, Managements comments, Government
requirements and regulations.
Page 197
1.7 Design Goals
A translation of the voice of customer into measurable design objectives,
assure that the voice of customer is not lost in design activity.
Page 198
Phase 2 : Product Design and Development
Objective :-
To develop design feature and characteristics into near final form
Should consider all design factors to ensure the final product will satisfy
the '' Voice of the customer''
Page 200
2.7 Material Specifications
Material specification should be reviewed for special characteristics
relating to physical properties, Performance, environmental, handling and
storage requirement.
These characteristics should be included in control plan.
Objective :-
To develop a comprehensive manufacturing system and its related control
plan to achieve quality products.
Page 201
Outputs of Phase 3
Inputs of Phase 3
(Inputs of Phase 4 & 5)
* DFMEA * Process Flow Chart
* Design for manufacturing & * Floor Plan Layout
Assembly. * System Review
* Design verification. * Characteristics matrix (optional)
* Design Reviews * PFMEA
* Proto-type build control plan * Pre-Launch Control Plan
* Engineering drawing * Work-instructions, Work
* Engineering specification standards, SOP
* Materials specification * Inspections Standards
* Drawing & specification change * Measurement system Analysis
* Gauge/testing equipment Plan
requirement
* New equipment, tooling and * Capability study plan (SPC)
facilities requirement. * Packing Standards
* Special product and process * Packing, Transportation
*characteristics.
Team feasibility commitment and Specifications etc.
management support
Page 202
3.5 Characteristics Matrix (Optional)
Recommended analytical technique for displaying the relationship
between process parameters and manufacturing stations.
3.6 PFMEA
Should be conducted during product planning and before beginning
production.
3.7 Pre-Launch Control Plan
A description of the dimensional measurements, material and functional
tests that will occur after prototype and before full production.
The purpose of pre-launch control plan is to contain potential non-
conformances during or prior to initial production runs.
Page 203
Phase 4 : Product and Process Validation
Objective :-
To validate the manufacturing process through an evolution of production
trial run.
Outputs of Phase 4
Inputs of Phase 4
(Inputs of Phase 5)
* Process Flow Chart * Production trial run
* Floor Plan Layout * MSA result
* System Review * Capability Result
* Characteristics matrix (optional) * PPAP
* PFMEA * Control Plan
* Pre-Launch Control Plan * Packing / Transportation
* Work-instructions, Work standards, evolution
SOP * Quality Planning Sign-off
* Inspections Standards
* Measurement system Analysis Plan
* Capability study plan (SPC)
* Packing Standards
* Packing, Transportation
Specifications etc.
4.2 MSA
Evaluate the measurement devices and methods used to check the
characteristics specified in the control plan.
Page 204
4.3 Preliminary Process Capability Study (SPC)
SPC study on the characteristics specified in the control plan.
Page 205
Phase 5 : Feedback, Assessment and Corrective Action
To review the effectiveness of total quality planning system outputs.
To initiate improvements action
To confirm all customer requirements are met or exceeded and
documented.
Outputs of Phase 5
Reduced Variation, Confirmed customer satisfaction, Meeting Delivery &
Service Requirements.
Page 206
Primery Steps before starting APQP
Simultaneous Engineering
Concurrent phases, replace sequential series of phases, saves time.
(In it before finish of 1st phase we start next phase to save time)
Page 207
Product Quality Planning Timing Chart
Page 208
History of 8D methodology.
Describe zero D ?
Zero D is used to notify the complaint to supplier.
Zero D is filled by customer representative or SQA
Zero D is used by customer representative or SQA to understanding the
problem and understanding the criticality of problem. To decide whether
8D shall be initiated or not, Decision shall be taken, weather problem shall
be raised as Non- conformity or not to supplier.
Page 209
What is problem ?
A non desirable situation is called problem .
Problem is an opportunity for improvement
What is CAPA ?
Page 210
Preventive Action:- Action taken to eliminate the causes of a potential non
conformity, defect in the order to prevent occurrence. Preventive action to
be taken before the occurrence.
It is proactive approach.
Before understanding the 8D, We must know the tools used in 8D.
Define 8 steps in 8D
Page 211
What is difference in functional and cross-functional team ?
Functional Team :-
A team from common function is called functional team,
Example :- (1) Production department is group of functional team
(2) Quality department is group of functional team etc.,
Cross-functional team ?
A cross-functional team is a group of people with different functional
expertise working toward a common goal.
It may include people from finance, marketing, operations, and human
resources departments.
Typically, it includes employees from all levels of an organization. Members
may also come from outside an organization (in particular, from suppliers,
key customers, or consultants).
Page 212
Global-8D
Page 213
How to define a Problem ?
(a) 5W 2H method is generally used
(b) Is / Is not method is not used generally.
What is 5W 2H ?
It is a tool of describing the problem
5W 2H is stands for
Page 214
Global 8D :- Rejection training to concerned persons
Give the training about rejected part with the help of Rejected part
shown physically to affected departments, and also explain how problem
is affected our customer,
Page 215
DOC.NO:-F/AQE/01
AQ E Training & H R Consultancy
Effect Date:-01/08/19
Training Attendance Record
Topic :
Venue :
Date :
Department :
Faculty:
10
11
12
13
14
Prepared By:- Approved By:-
Page 216
DOC.NO:-F/AQE/13
Efft Date:-01/1/19
Subject:-
Training Contents
Training Given To
Page 217
Containment action :-
During containment action, if need to segregate material.
After segregation 4 types of material left
(1) Ok Material
(2) Reject material
(3) Reworkable material
(4) Repair material
Page 218
Format No:-F/AQE/19
AQE Training & HR Consultancy Rev.No:-"00
Page 219
BRAIN STORMING
Page 220
(2) Unstructured method :-
In this method, a group of 5-6 people or CFT team participate in this
session
Each member sit around a table.
In this method everybody is free to give his suggestion.
Members having more ideas can share their ideas freely
After categories all ideas actions are taken on possible and may possible
cause, not possible cause have no action taken.
Page 221
Fish bone diagram / Cause & Effect diagram / Ishikawa diagram
It is also a part of 7 QC tools.
Fish bone diagram invented by Dr. Kaoru Ishikawa In 1943.
He used it in Kawasaki Iron Works in 1943
Important points
(1) Fish bone diagram is used in all type of problem solving methodology.
(2) Fish bone diagram is called it because its shape looks like a fish bone.
(3) It is very important tool to identified potential / possible root cause.
(4) 6M used in fish bone diagram is :- (i) Men (ii) Method (iii) Material
(iv) mother nature (environment) (v) Machine (vi) Measurement
(5) We only find potential / possible causes only, root cause is not find
in this process.
(6) After find possible cause we have to use another tool to find root
cause. Example :- Validation method , Why-Why analysis etc.
(7) For find out potential / possible cause in fish bone diagram, we need
to do first brainstorming.
After brainstorming potential causes are filled in to fish bone diagram,
Category wise, that is men related cause in men column etc.
Page 222
(8) There are primary, secondary or tracery cause or 4th level or may be
5th level of cause identified depend upon team maturity.
(9) It is minimum required 20 to 25 possible cause identified for a good
identification of cause, many industry identify only 5 to 6 cause , it is not a
good practice.
Step 1 :- Make fish bone diagram and write all possible causes in 6M
after brainstorming session.
Step 2 :- Find out suspected cause from the possible cause.
Step 3 :- Validate all the suspect cause and write the result. All the
validated results are valid cause of problem.
Step 4 :- Do the Why - Why analysis of the valid cause and find out the
root causes of the problem.
Page 223
INTERNAL / CUSTOMER NAME :- ANNAXURE :- 1
FISH BONE DIAGRAM, CAUSE & EFFECT FOR
PROJECT NAME :-
TEAM MEMBER :-
Quality Problem
PROCEDURE GAUGING TEMPRATURE
PREPARED BY :- VERIFIED BY :-
Page 224
Supplier Name:
ROOT CAUSE VERIFICAITON ON SUSPECTED SOURCE OF VARIATION ANNEXURE-02
CATEGORY PROBABLE CAUSES REQUIREMENT / SPECIFICATION VERIFICATION METHOD ACTUAL OBSERVED RESULT
Not applicable
MACHINE
METHOD
Wi displayed on final inspection
WI not displayed Verified on table Available on table INVALID
table
Check with Daily inspection
Inspection Frequency Not Adequate 100 % material check record of inspector, how much 100 % material check INVALID
quantity they checked
Not applicable
MATERIAL
Page 225
PFD / PFC stands for process flow diagram or process flow chart.
PFD / PFC is a important tool of PPAP
Flow chart is a important tool of 7QC tools.
A flowchart is a type of diagram that represents a workflow or process.
Commonly alternative names used for flow chart is: flow chart, process
flowchart, functional flowchart, process map, process chart, functional
process chart, business process model, process model, process flow
diagram, work flow diagram, business flow diagram.
Page 226
ANSI and ISO give some symbols of PFD or Flow charts which description
given below.
Name Symbol Description
Page 227
Process Flow Diagram
Part Name ABC Date of Origin 09.01.2019 P.F.D. No.: PFD/AQE/01
Customer Part No. 123 Process Responsibility PFD. Rev. No. & Date
Model No. PK Production & Quality Assurance 00 & 09.01.2019
Operation Characteristics
Process
PROCESS Source of Variation Control Method
Description Flow Diagram Products Process
No.
Material Grade Raw
Receipt of Raw Spectro Analysis
OP-10 Diameter Storage + Inspection Material
Material Receiving Inspection
Hardness Supplier
Set- Up Approval
Dimensional Tool wear Out/
OP-20 Cold Forging Cold Forging Inprocess Inspection
Variation Over run
Tool life Monitoring
Temp.- 650° ± 10°
Hardness S. Time- 180 Min. Set- Up Approval
OP-30 Stress Relieving Out Source
Variation Cooling time -6 Hrs. Inprocess Inspection
Cooling Temp. - 200°
Grade- S280
OP-40 Shot Blasting Scaling not remove Size:- 0.40 Out Source Clock-
Time:- 15 Min. Cleaning Freq.-
Receiving Dimensional
OP-50 50-55 HRB & Scaling Receipt Stage Receiving Inspection
Inspection Variation
RPM: 2800 Set- Up Approval
Dimensional
OP-60 Machining 1st Feed: 0.12 In House Inprocess Inspection
Variation
Tool Life: 300 pcs. Tool life Monitoring
RPM: 2800 Set- Up Approval
Dimensional
OP-70 Machining 2nd Feed: 0.12 In House Inprocess Inspection
Variation
Tool Life: 300 pcs. Tool life Monitoring
Page 228
Page 229
Gemba or Genba :-
Genba (現場, also called as gemba) is a Japanese term meaning
"the actual place".
In business, genba refers to the place where value is created; in
manufacturing the genba is the factory floor. It can be any "site" such as a
construction site, sales floor or where the service provider interacts directly
with the customer.
In quality management, genba means the manufacturing floor and the idea is
that if a problem occurs, the engineers must go there to understand the full
impact of the problem.
Gemba walks denote the action of going to see the actual process,
understand the work, ask questions, and learn.
Gemba walk person must know the process flow.
Over the course of a Gemba Walk, leaders, managers and supervisors are
expected to simply observe and understand process.
As part of the Kaizen methodology, it is also supposed to encourage
greater communication, transparency and trust between the lower-level
of employees and leadership.
For this reason, it is not appropriate to use a Gemba walk to point out
employee flaws, or enforce policy - this runs the risk of employees putting
up barriers to leadership, or closing off altogether.
Page 230
Why- Why analysis or 5W analysis
It is the tool of Root cause analysis (RCA)
One of the most useful tool for finding the root cause is to asking
Why ? until the root cause is reached.
As each new why explored , the closer you will get the real Root Cause.
The process is referred to as 5 why since chances are that asking Why?
five time will uncover the root cause.
Stop asking why which is not in your control that is weather, rain, etc.
It is not fixed we find root cause on 5th why probably may be found on
3rd , 4th or even 7th or 8th why ?
If we found root cause on 1st or 2nd why it means our root cause is not
correct.
Page 231
Example of Why Why analysis
Page 232
Define 8 steps in 8D
Describe D0 ?
D0 is used to notify the complaint to supplier.
D0 is filled by customer representative or SQA
D0 is used by customer representative or SQA to understanding the
problem and understanding the criticality of problem. To decide whether
8D shall be initiated or not, Decision shall be taken, weather problem shall
be raised as Non-conformity or not to supplier.
In case of internal rejection , No need to fill D0, It is only filled by
customer.
Describe D1 ?
CFT ( Cross functional team ) The Team should include all functions with
knowledge of the problem (including “process owner”).
Team Leader or Quality Manager should train team members as needed, but
leading the team through the process is the best form of training.
Page 233
Describe D2 ?
Page 234
Note :- (1) Rework / Repair instructions shall be define.
(2) Verification of Rework / Repair product shall be performed.
(4) Scrap :- Scrap material move to scrap area and scrap reports shall be
available.
Others :-
(1) For online portal :- Fill the containment action in one working day.
(2) ICA (Interim containment action ) may become PCA (permanent
corrective action )
(3) At the time of containment action problem is must describe and display
to shop floor person and every concerned person related to part, and also
give training to all of them regarding problem and also take sign on training
sheet regarding problem.
(4) And after segregation Ok material will dispatch to customer with 100%
marking on part.
Describe D4 ?
For finding root cause used the tool :- Fishbone diagram, Brain-storming,
Why - Why analysis, PFD and Gemba walk
Other tools also used but mostly this tool are preferred.
See Fishbone diagram, Brain-storming, why- why analysis, PFD, gemba walk
(See Chapter or video.)
Page 235
Describe D5 ?
Describe D6 ?
The Corrective Action has to address the Root Cause, so it’s important that
a follow up audit verifies that the Root Cause was eliminated!
D5 and D6 shall include responsibility and dates (Actual & Target) for
actions.
Describe D7 ?
(a) Preventive action :- Modify all system which can cause similar problem
(management systems, operating systems, practices, procedures, work
instructions, inspection forms, gauges, inspection methods, evaluate tooling
and fixturing etc.)
Page 236
(b) Document upgradation :- Revise Fmea, control plan, other related
documents. Standardized all documents.
Describe D8 ?
The Person Responsible for Closure Approval thanks and congratulates the
members of the Team
Page 237
AQE Training & Hr Consultancy
8D REPORT
Supplie r Tota l Qty:
Custom e r Qty .Com pla ine d:
8 D CAPA No Qty.re je cte d:
Loca tion: Orgin Da te :
Pa rt No: Actua l Close Da te :
Product Na m e : De fe ct
INTERNAL or EXTERNAL SUPPLIER
or
D1 TEAM MEMBER NAMES/TITLES: D2 PROBLEM STATEMENT/DESCRIPTION
D3 CHOOSE AND VERIFY INTERIM CONTAINMENT ACTION(S) (ICA): Responsibility Date Planned Date achieved
D5 CHOOSE AND VERIFY PERMANENT CORRECTIVE ACTION(S) (PCA): Responsibility Target date
D6 IMPLEMENT AND VALIDATE PERMANENT CORRECTIVE ACTION(S) (PCA): Target Date: Actual Date:
D8 TEAM AND INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION: Recognize the collective efforts of the team.
PREPARED VERIFIED CHECKED APPROVED
Page 238
QUALITY PROBLEM REPORT
QPR NO.:
DATE:
COMPONENT NAME:
QUANTITY:
PROBLEM/DEFECT SEEN OCCURANCE AT SKETCH(IF REQD)
REJECTED
CORRECTIVE AND PREVENTIVE ACTION (TO BE MADE BY SUPPLIER AND SENT BACK TO SIPL)
DATE
FROM, TO,
PROBLEM DETAIL:
Detection:-
PREPARED BY APPROVED BY
Format No. :
Record: Retention Period 1 year after closure
Note: If any modification done in format please get it approved from MR.
Page 239
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT
Part Name : Open Date : Nature Of Defect : Supplier Name:
Part No. : Closing Date : Customer Name : Supplier Code:-
1.0 Problem Description 2.0 Containment action
Identification on OK
Stage Total Material Ok (after Segregation) Reject Quantity Remarks
Parts
Inhouse
Customer
Other
Page 240
FM/I/PU/15
Model: Sr.No:
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT Issue date:
Close date:
8D stage: Internal Customer Supplier Part Description: Counter Wt
Customer / Supplier Name: Part No.:
A. PROBLEM STATEMENT : Should Answer ISSUE REPORTED : REPEAT / 1'ST TIME
What (is the problem? (Expression by customer)
Who is affected
Where Location
When Since
QUANTITY VERIFICATION:
Transit (to Transit (to satellite Satellite plant / Transit (Supplier to
Location Customer Inhouse
customer) plant / warehouse) Warehouse plant)
QTY Available
QTY Rejected /
Quarantined
D. ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS OF PROBLEM:
Are Control Plan/SOP available near M/C? Is the specified Raw Matl./Tooling used ? Is process needs
YES NO YES NO environmental control?
Are Control Plan respected ? Is the Raw Matl./Tooling Supplier change ? YES NO
YES NO YES NO Is it implemented ?
Is the defect part was detected Is the heat treatment method change ? YES NO
by operator / inspector & later YES NO Does it conform ?
mixed with production ? YES NO
YES NO
*** *** ***
Page 241
8- DISCIPLINE PROBLEM SOLVING APPROACH
Customer Ref No/ NC
Reported Complaint Category Page No :- 1
No.
Date of complaint 4M Distribution Model
Part Name Part No Department
All available stock was isolated and sorted with the following results.
1st WHY 2nd WHY 3rd WHY 4th WHY 5th WHY 1H
Occurrence
Outgoing
5. Work out the suggested ideas (min. one Poke-Yoke) and verify the root cause within 7 calendar days;
Date of
Action Responsible
Implementation
NIL
Page 242
6. Define & Implement the permanent corrective actions within 14 calendar days;
Date of
Action Responsible
Implementation
Responsible:-
Check date
7. Measure to avoid the repetition of the problem, prevention of recurrence of the defect for similar pers or process within 14 days;
Product/Product FMEA
Process/Process FMEA
Control-plan
Instruction
Responsible Date:
8. Final Meeting
Results:
Accomplished at:
Page 243
Format No.FM/AQE/12
Supplier cum Internal Problem Solving Sheet Rev No. Revision Date::
02 02-09-2019
Problem Description
Photo of Defect Description of Problem
1
2
3
4
Possible Reason
In Account of
Sr. No Reason
Man Machine Material Method
Review documents:
(Revise document to include the corrective action to make it part pf the system, so that it can be followed by all concerned):
Revision details.
Sr. No. Document revised
Revision no. Revision date.
Process flow
FMEA
Control plan
Work instruction
Checksheets
Other Specify:
Prep. By :- Approved by :-
Customer Comments (Validation) & Sign.
Page 244
1 4 DEFECT CONTROL REPORT 12 Date :
Defect : ANALYSIS RESULT : Where Vendor Sub-Vendor Vendor Name :
Reported By : Nos Reported : Repeat (In 1yr) Sub-Vendor :
Date of Occurrence : Model : MAN MACHINE Root Cause MAN MACHINE Prepared By Verified By Approved By Verified By Approved By
Part Name : Part No : (4M) MATERIAL METHOD
Batch Code :
2 IMMEDIATE ACTION 6
VI
On Assembly Line 7 Suspected Quantity (Indicate OK for 3 days before and after the Defective Batch Code)
Actual Defect Sketch/Photo
3 Sl No Part No / Date Remarks
Batch code
Qty Produced
Dispatch/Receipt from
Sub-vendor
In-house processing/
Final inspection qty.
8 STUDY OF CAUSE & SIMULATION TEST 10 COUNTERMEASURES 13 VER IFICA TION / CHECK POINTS (Imp lemen t at io n o f Co u n t ermeasu res in Pro cess & Do cu men t at io n w it h Dat e)
Sl No Process Test Result Decision Sl No Countermeasure Date Sl No Checkpoints / Standardization at Vendor End Date Remarks
(Standardization should cover Process Change - Start up checksheet, maintenance check sheet for jigs &
1 1 fixtures, identification system, follow-up of countermeasure lot, modification in operator's training module,
modification in GSIS-P/P.C.S/Control plan/Drg,PFMEA etc.)
2 2 1
3 2
4 3
5 4
6 5
9 5 WHY ANALYSIS 14
CHECK POINTS & STANDARISATION
Step 1 2 3 4 5 Sl No Date Checked By Remarks
(To be filled by Customer)
Occurrence
Out Flow
Page 245
AQE Training & HR Consultancy
DEFEFCT ANALYSIS & COUNTER MEASURE REPORT
FORMAT./REV.NO.
PART NAME CUSTOMER DACR CONTROL NO.
DATE OF REVIEW-
RESPONSIBLE
CUS. PART NO. DEFECT REPORT DATE DACR RETURN DATE&SIGN.
DEPTT. / SUPPLIER
SLPL PART NO. DEFECT QTY. DACR ISSUE DATE
RAISED BY :
COMPLETION
DATE
OCCURENCE
(4) 5 WHY
ANALYSIS
FLOW
SR. NO. ROOT CAUSE FINDINGS CORRECTIVE ACTION TAKEN RESPONSIBILITY TARGET DATE EFFECTIVE DATE
B. HORIZONTEL DEPLOYMENT
2 PROCESS SHEET
3 DRAWING
4 PFMEA
5 LAYERED AUDIT
6 WORK INSTRUCTION
7 OTHERS IF ANY
LOT NO-01
LOT NO-02
LOT NO-03
Page 246
NOTE: ERA IMPLEMENTATION SHOULD BE ONE WORKING DAY ANDCORRECTIVE ACTION IMPLEMENTATION WITH IN FIVE WORKING DAYS FROM DEFECT REPORTED DATE.