Title: "The Evolutionary Odyssey: Unraveling the Stages of Human Evolution"

Introduction:

What makes us uniquely human? Human evolution, the process by which modern humans
emerged as a distinct species, is a captivating journey that spans millions of
years. From the moment our earliest ancestors stood upright on the African savannah
over 4 million years ago to the rise of civilizations and the digital age, the
story of humanity is one of extraordinary transformation. Over millions of years, a
combination of biological adaptations and cultural innovations has shaped us into
the species we are today. Yet, the journey of human evolution is not just a tale of
physical change—it is a narrative of how we developed the ability to think,
communicate, and create, setting us apart from all other life on Earth.

The field of paleoanthropology, which combines elements of anthropology,

archaeology, and evolutionary biology, has been instrumental in piecing together
the puzzle of human evolution. Through meticulous examination of fossil records,
genetic analyses, and archaeological findings, scientists have constructed an
increasingly detailed picture of our ancestral lineage.

This paper argues that human evolution is best understood as a series of

interconnected stages, driven by both biological milestones—such as bipedalism,
brain expansion, and tool use—and cultural breakthroughs—including language,
cooperation, and symbolic thought. By examining these stages, we can trace how
early hominins evolved into modern Homo sapiens and explore the profound
implications of this journey for understanding our identity, society, and future.

The paper is structured into five main sections, each exploring a crucial stage in
human evolution: Early Hominins, Homo Habilis and Homo Erectus, Archaic Homo
Sapiens, Anatomically Modern Humans, and Recent Human Evolution. Within each
section, we will investigate both the biological foundations of human evolution,
focusing on key adaptations, and the role of cultural evolution, highlighting how
tools, language, and social structures propelled humanity forward.

By weaving together insights from paleontology, genetics, and anthropology, this

paper not only illuminates the stages of human evolution but also invites readers
to reflect on the intricate interplay of biology and culture that defines our
species. As we embark on this exploration of human evolution, we will see that our
history is not a simple, linear progression, but rather a branching tree with
multiple concurrent lineages, occasional dead ends, and surprising
interconnections. This journey through time will not only illuminate our biological
heritage but also provide insights into the forces that continue to shape our
species today and into the future.

Early Hominins

The story of human evolution begins with the emergence of early hominins, our
earliest ancestors that diverged from other primates. This divergence, a pivotal
moment in evolutionary history, set the stage for the unique path of human
development. The discovery of Sahelanthropus tchadensis, dating back to 7-6 million
years ago, has pushed back the timeline of human evolution significantly (Brunet et
al., 2002). This species, found in Chad, exhibits a mixture of ape-like and human-
like features, suggesting it may be close to the last common ancestor of humans and
chimpanzees. The most striking feature of S. tchadensis is its cranium, which shows
a unique combination of primitive and derived characteristics. While its brain size
was similar to that of modern chimpanzees, the position of its foramen magnum (the
hole at the base of the skull where the spinal cord exits) suggests it may have
been capable of bipedal locomotion.
Orrorin tugenensis, discovered in Kenya and dated to approximately 6 million years
ago, provides further evidence of early bipedalism, a key characteristic in human
evolution (Senut et al., 2001). The femoral and dental remains of Orrorin suggest
it was adapted to both bipedal locomotion and tree climbing, representing a
transitional form in hominin evolution. The femur of O. tugenensis shows
morphological features associated with bipedalism, including a long femoral neck
and a groove on the posterior aspect of the femoral neck, both of which are
characteristic of later hominins.

The genus Ardipithecus, particularly Ardipithecus ramidus, dated to 4.4 million

years ago, offers crucial insights into early hominin anatomy and behavior (White
et al., 2009). Ardipithecus had a more primitive foot structure than later
hominins, indicating that it was still adapted to life in the trees while also
capable of bipedal locomotion on the ground. The discovery of a nearly complete
skeleton of A. ramidus, nicknamed "Ardi," has provided unprecedented insights into
the anatomy and lifestyle of early hominins. Ardi's pelvis and foot structure
suggest a form of bipedalism that was distinct from both modern humans and
chimpanzees, indicating a unique evolutionary trajectory.

Perhaps the most well-known early hominin genus is Australopithecus, which existed
from about 4 to 2 million years ago. The discovery of "Lucy," a remarkably complete
Australopithecus afarensis skeleton, revolutionized our understanding of early
human ancestors (Johanson & White, 1979). Australopithecines showed clear
adaptations for bipedalism, including a curved spine and bowl-shaped pelvis, while
retaining some ape-like features such as long arms and small brains relative to
body size. The Australopithecus genus includes several species, such as A.
africanus, A. afarensis, and A. sediba, each providing unique insights into hominin
evolution.

A. afarensis, to which Lucy belongs, lived between 3.9 and 2.9 million years ago.
This species shows a mosaic of primitive and derived features. While their brain
size was only slightly larger than that of modern chimpanzees, their postcranial
skeleton shows clear adaptations for bipedal locomotion. The famous Laetoli
footprints, dated to 3.6 million years ago and attributed to A. afarensis, provide
direct evidence of bipedal walking in a human-like manner (Leakey & Hay, 1979).

A. africanus, found in South Africa and dating from about 3.3 to 2.1 million years
ago, had a slightly larger brain than A. afarensis and shows evidence of a more
human-like diet. Studies of A. africanus teeth using stable isotope analysis
suggest that they had a varied diet that included both C3 (trees and shrubs) and C4
(grasses and sedges) plants, indicating adaptability to different environments
(Sponheimer & Lee-Thorp, 1999).

The discovery of A. sediba in 2008 provided new insights into the transition from
Australopithecus to Homo. Dated to about 2 million years ago, A. sediba shows a
unique combination of Australopithecus-like and Homo-like features, suggesting it
may be a transitional form between the two genera (Berger et al., 2010).

Homo Habilis and Homo Erectus

The transition from Australopithecus to the genus Homo marks a significant

milestone in human evolution. Homo habilis, often considered the first species of
our genus, appeared around 2.3 million years ago (Leakey et al., 1964). H. habilis
exhibited an increased cranial capacity compared to Australopithecus, with brain
sizes ranging from 550 to 687 cubic centimeters, compared to the average of about
450 cubic centimeters in Australopithecus. This increase in brain size is
associated with the earliest stone tools, known as the Oldowan industry. These
tools, primarily simple choppers and flakes, represent a crucial step in human
cognitive evolution and cultural development.

The ability to create and use tools marked a significant shift in hominin behavior.
It allowed for more efficient processing of food, including meat, which may have
contributed to further brain growth. The correlation between tool use, meat
consumption, and brain size increase is known as the "expensive tissue hypothesis"
(Aiello & Wheeler, 1995). This hypothesis suggests that the energy-intensive brain
could only evolve in conjunction with a reduction in the size of other expensive
organs, particularly the gut, which was made possible by a higher quality diet
including meat.

Homo erectus, emerging around 1.9 million years ago, represents a major leap
forward in hominin evolution (Antón, 2003). With a significantly larger brain size,
averaging 900 cubic centimeters, H. erectus was the first hominin to leave Africa,
spreading across Asia and Europe. This species is associated with more advanced
stone tool technology, the Acheulean industry, characterized by symmetrical hand
axes. These tools required greater cognitive abilities to conceptualize and create,
suggesting significant advancements in planning and spatial reasoning.

H. erectus also shows evidence of controlled use of fire, a pivotal development

that allowed for cooking food, protection from predators, and social gathering
around hearths (Wrangham, 2009). The ability to control fire had far-reaching
implications for human evolution. Cooking food increased its digestibility and
caloric value, potentially contributing to further brain growth. Fire also extended
the day, allowing for more social interaction and potentially driving the
development of language and complex social structures.

The long tenure of H. erectus, lasting until about 143,000 years ago, saw
significant anatomical and behavioral changes. Later H. erectus specimens show
increased brain size and more human-like body proportions, suggesting a gradual
evolution towards modern human form (Rightmire, 1998). H. erectus also exhibited
the first clear evidence of extended childhoods, a key feature of human development
that allows for prolonged learning and complex social interactions.

The geographic spread of H. erectus led to regional variations, with some

populations developing unique characteristics. For example, the specimens found in
Asia, sometimes classified as H. erectus sensu stricto, show distinct features such
as thicker cranial bones and larger brow ridges compared to their African
counterparts. This regional variation set the stage for the complex patterns of
human diversity we see today.

Archaic Homo Sapiens

The category of archaic Homo sapiens encompasses several species that bridge the
gap between H. erectus and anatomically modern humans. This period, roughly from
700,000 to 200,000 years ago, was characterized by increasing brain size, more
sophisticated tool technologies, and complex social behaviors.

Homo heidelbergensis, dating from about 700,000 to 200,000 years ago, is often
considered a direct ancestor of both modern humans and Neanderthals (Stringer,
2012). H. heidelbergensis had a brain size approaching that of modern humans,
averaging around 1200 cubic centimeters. This species is associated with advanced
hunting techniques, including the use of wooden spears, as evidenced by finds at
Schöningen, Germany, dated to around 400,000 years ago (Thieme, 1997).

H. heidelbergensis also shows the first clear evidence of shelter construction, as

seen at the site of Terra Amata in France. These structures, dating to around
400,000 years ago, suggest a level of planning and social cooperation previously
unseen in the hominin record. Additionally, there's evidence that H.
heidelbergensis may have been the first to use symbolic thought, as indicated by
the Berekhat Ram figurine from Israel, possibly dating to 250,000 years ago
(d'Errico & Nowell, 2000).

Homo neanderthalensis, or Neanderthals, existed from about 400,000 to 40,000 years

ago, primarily in Europe and parts of Asia (Hublin, 2009). Neanderthals were well-
adapted to cold climates, with robust bodies, large noses (possibly an adaptation
for warming cold air), and brain sizes that often exceeded those of modern humans.
They developed sophisticated stone tool technologies, including the Mousterian
industry, characterized by a wide variety of specialized tools.

Recent archaeological evidence has dramatically changed our view of Neanderthal

cognitive abilities. Findings include possible symbolic artifacts, such as the use
of pigments and feathers for personal adornment, and even cave art predating the
arrival of modern humans in Europe (Hoffmann et al., 2018). Neanderthals buried
their dead, possibly with grave goods, suggesting complex social structures and
perhaps spiritual beliefs.

Genetic studies have revealed that Neanderthals interbred with modern humans,
contributing to the genetic makeup of non-African populations today (Green et al.,
2010). This interbreeding has left a lasting legacy in our genome, with some
Neanderthal genes potentially providing benefits such as enhanced immune response,
while others may contribute to certain health risks in modern populations.

The Denisovans, another archaic human species, were discovered through genetic
analysis of a finger bone found in Denisova Cave in Siberia (Reich et al., 2010).
While little is known about their physical appearance due to the scarcity of fossil
remains, genetic studies have revealed that they were a sister group to
Neanderthals and also interbred with both modern humans and Neanderthals.

The impact of Denisovan DNA is particularly pronounced in some modern Oceanian

populations, where it comprises up to 6% of the genome. Some of these genetic
contributions appear to have been adaptive. For example, a Denisovan version of the
EPAS1 gene, which helps in adapting to high-altitude, low-oxygen environments, is
common in modern Tibetan populations (Huerta-Sánchez et al., 2014).

The existence of these diverse archaic human species, their complex behaviors, and
their genetic contributions to modern humans paint a picture of human evolution
that is far more intricate than previously thought. Rather than a linear
progression, human evolution appears to have been a complex web of interacting
lineages, with periods of separation followed by admixture.
Anatomically Modern Humans

The emergence of Homo sapiens, or anatomically modern humans, marks the final stage
in the evolution of our species. Fossil evidence suggests that H. sapiens first
appeared in Africa around 300,000 to 200,000 years ago (Hublin et al., 2017). These
early modern humans exhibited the distinctive features of our species, including a
high, rounded skull, small brow ridges, a prominent chin, and a slender skeleton.

The Jebel Irhoud fossils from Morocco, dated to approximately 315,000 years ago,
represent some of the earliest known H. sapiens remains (Hublin et al., 2017).
While these fossils show a mixture of archaic and modern features, they demonstrate
that the transition to anatomically modern humans was a gradual process occurring
across Africa.
The "Out of Africa" hypothesis posits that H. sapiens originated in Africa and
subsequently migrated to other parts of the world, replacing other hominin species
(Stringer & Andrews, 1988). This model is supported by both fossil and genetic
evidence, although recent discoveries have complicated the picture, suggesting
multiple waves of migration and interbreeding with other hominin species.
Genetic studies have provided crucial insights into the spread of modern humans
across the globe. Mitochondrial DNA evidence suggests that all living humans
descend from a population that lived in Africa around 200,000 years ago (Cann et
al., 1987). Y-chromosome studies indicate that all living men share a common
ancestor who lived around 200,000 to 300,000 years ago, also in Africa (Poznik et
al., 2013).

The first migrations out of Africa likely occurred around 70,000-60,000 years ago,
although earlier migrations are evidenced by fossil finds such as the Misliya Cave
remains in Israel, dated to about 180,000 years ago (Hershkovitz et al., 2018).
These early migrants spread across Eurasia, reaching Australia by at least 65,000
years ago and the Americas by around 15,000 years ago.

As modern humans spread across the globe, they encountered and interbred with other
hominin species, particularly Neanderthals and Denisovans. Genetic analyses have
revealed that non-African populations carry 1-4% Neanderthal DNA, while some
Oceanian populations have up to 6% Denisovan DNA (Sankararaman et al., 2014). This
interbreeding may have provided modern humans with beneficial genetic variants,
such as adaptations to high-altitude environments or enhanced immune responses.
The cognitive and cultural explosion associated with modern humans, often termed
the "Upper Paleolithic Revolution," occurred around 50,000-40,000 years ago. This
period saw a dramatic increase in the complexity and diversity of stone tools, the
emergence of figurative art, jewelry, and musical instruments, and evidence of more
complex social structures and symbolic behaviors (Bar-Yosef, 2002).

The development of language, while leaving no direct archaeological traces, was

likely a crucial factor in the success of H. sapiens. While the exact timing of
language evolution is debated, it's clear that by the Upper Paleolithic, humans
possessed the cognitive capabilities for complex communication. This ability would
have facilitated cooperation, information sharing, and cultural transmission on an
unprecedented scale.
Recent Human Evolution

Contrary to popular belief, human evolution did not cease with the emergence of
anatomically modern humans. The last 10,000 years have seen significant genetic and
phenotypic changes in human populations, driven by factors such as changing diets,
disease pressures, and cultural practices.

The advent of agriculture, beginning around 12,000 years ago, had profound effects
on human biology and society. This Neolithic Revolution marked a shift from a
hunter-gatherer lifestyle to one based on farming and animal husbandry. The change
to a diet based on domesticated plants and animals led to changes in jaw structure,
tooth size, and digestive adaptations (Larsen, 1995). For example, there's evidence
of a reduction in tooth size and jaw robusticity in agricultural populations
compared to hunter-gatherers.

The increased population densities facilitated by agriculture created new selective

pressures, particularly in terms of disease resistance. The close proximity of
humans to domesticated animals and to each other in larger settlements led to the
emergence of new infectious diseases. This resulted in selection for enhanced
immune responses, as seen in the high frequency of certain immune-related genes in
post-agricultural populations (Fumagalli et al., 2011).

One of the most well-documented examples of recent human evolution is lactase

persistence, the ability to digest milk into adulthood. This trait evolved
independently in several populations after the domestication of cattle, with
different genetic mutations leading to the same phenotype in European and African
populations (Tishkoff et al., 2007). This is a clear example of gene-culture
coevolution, where a cultural practice (dairy farming) created a new selective
pressure.

Other examples of recent adaptations include high-altitude adaptations in Tibetan

and Andean populations. Tibetans, for instance, have genetic variants that allow
them to thrive in the low-oxygen environment of the Tibetan plateau. Interestingly,
one of these variants was inherited from Denisovans, highlighting the importance of
archaic admixture in recent human evolution (Huerta-Sánchez et al., 2014).

Skin pigmentation is another trait that has undergone recent evolution. As humans
migrated out of Africa into areas with less intense sunlight, there was selection
for lighter skin to allow for adequate vitamin D production. Conversely, in
equatorial regions, darker skin was maintained to protect against UV radiation.
Genetic studies have identified several genes involved in skin pigmentation that
show signatures of recent selection (Crawford et al., 2017).

Ongoing evolution in modern humans is evident in changing allele frequencies for

various traits. For instance, there's evidence of selection for increased height in
some European populations (Turchin et al., 2012). Other studies have found
signatures of recent selection in genes related to diet, brain development, and
immune function (Voight et al., 2006).

The impact of cultural practices on human evolution extends beyond physiological

adaptations. For instance, the advent of writing systems and formal education may
have influenced cognitive abilities. Some researchers argue that literacy has
changed the way our brains process visual information, potentially affecting the
evolution of visual processing circuits (Dehaene et al., 2010).

Technological advancements continue to shape our evolutionary trajectory. The

widespread use of antibiotics, for example, has led to the evolution of antibiotic-
resistant bacteria, creating new health challenges. On the other hand, medical
interventions have relaxed some selective pressures, allowing individuals with
certain genetic conditions to survive and reproduce, potentially increasing genetic
diversity in the population.

The increasing globalization and mobility of human populations are also influencing
our genetic makeup. Increased gene flow between previously isolated populations is
leading to greater genetic admixture, potentially reducing genetic differences
between populations while increasing diversity within them (Hellenthal et al.,
2014).

Climate change presents new selective pressures that may drive future human
evolution. As global temperatures rise and weather patterns shift, humans may need
to adapt to new environmental conditions. This could involve physiological
adaptations to heat stress or changing disease patterns, as well as behavioral and
cultural adaptations.

As we look to the future, it's clear that human evolution is an ongoing process.
While the pace and direction of future evolutionary changes are difficult to
predict, they will undoubtedly be influenced by our changing environment,
technological advancements, and cultural practices. The field of gene editing, for
instance, raises the possibility of directed human evolution, where we may have the
ability to shape our own genetic future.

Understanding our evolutionary past and present is crucial for anticipating and
potentially shaping our species' future trajectory. It also provides valuable
insights into human health and disease, as many modern health issues can be
understood as mismatches between our evolved biology and our current environment
and lifestyles.
In conclusion, human evolution is a complex, ongoing process that has shaped our
species over millions of years. From the emergence of early hominins to the
cultural and technological explosion of modern humans, and continuing through
recent and ongoing genetic changes, our evolutionary journey reflects the interplay
of biological, environmental, and cultural factors. As we face new challenges in
the modern world, our evolutionary heritage continues to influence our biology and
behavior, while also providing the adaptability that has been key to our species'
success.

References:

1. Aiello, L. C., & Wheeler, P. (1995). The expensive-tissue hypothesis: The brain
and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Current Anthropology,
36(2), 199-221.

2. Antón, S. C. (2003). Natural history of Homo erectus. American Journal of

Physical Anthropology, 122(S37), 126-170.

3. Bar-Yosef, O. (2002). The Upper Paleolithic revolution. Annual Review of

Anthropology, 31(1), 363-393.

4. Berger, L. R., de Ruiter, D. J., Churchill, S. E., Schmid, P., Carlson, K. J.,
Dirks, P. H., & Kibii, J. M. (2010). Australopithecus sediba: A new species of
Homo-like australopith from South Africa. Science, 328(5975), 195-204.

5. Brunet, M., Guy, F., Pilbeam, D., Mackaye, H. T., Likius, A., Ahounta, D., ... &
Zollikofer, C. (2002). A new hominid from the Upper Miocene of Chad, Central
Africa. Nature, 418(6894), 145-151.

6. Cann, R. L., Stoneking, M., & Wilson, A. C. (1987). Mitochondrial DNA and human
evolution. Nature, 325(6099), 31-36.

7. Crawford, N. G., Kelly, D. E., Hansen, M. E., Beltrame, M. H., Fan, S., Bowman,
S. L., ... & Tishkoff, S. A. (2017). Loci associated with skin pigmentation
identified in African populations. Science, 358(6365), eaan8433.

8. d'Errico, F., & Nowell, A. (2000). A new look at the Berekhat Ram figurine:
implications for the origins of symbolism. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 10(1),
123-167.

9. Dehaene, S., Pegado, F., Braga, L. W., Ventura, P., Nunes Filho, G., Jobert, A.,
... & Cohen, L. (2010). How learning to read changes the cortical networks for
vision and language. Science, 330(6009), 1359-1364.

10. Field, Y., Boyle, E. A., Telis, N., Gao, Z., Gaulton, K. J., Golan, D., ... &
Pritchard, J. K. (2016). Detection of human adaptation during the past 2000 years.
Science, 354(6313), 760-764.

11. Fumagalli, M., Sironi, M., Pozzoli, U., Ferrer-Admetlla, A., Pattini, L., &
Nielsen, R. (2011). Signatures of environmental genetic adaptation pinpoint
pathogens as the main selective pressure through human evolution. PLoS Genetics,
7(11), e1002355.

12. Green, R. E., Krause, J., Briggs, A. W., Maricic, T., Stenzel, U., Kircher, M.,
... & Pääbo, S. (2010). A draft sequence of the Neandertal genome. Science,
328(5979), 710-722.

13. Hellenthal, G., Busby, G. B., Band, G., Wilson, J. F., Capelli, C., Falush, D.,
& Myers, S. (2014). A genetic atlas of human admixture history. Science, 343(6172),
747-751.

14. Hershkovitz, I., Weber, G. W., Quam, R., Duval, M., Grün, R., Kinsley, L., ...
& Weinstein-Evron, M. (2018). The earliest modern humans outside Africa. Science,
359(6374), 456-459.

15. Hoffmann, D. L., Standish, C. D., García-Diez, M., Pettitt, P. B., Milton, J.
A., Zilhão, J., ... & Pike, A. W. (2018). U-Th dating of carbonate crusts reveals
Neandertal origin of Iberian cave art. Science, 359(6378), 912-915.

16. Hublin, J. J. (2009). The origin of Neandertals. Proceedings of the National

Academy of Sciences, 106(38), 16022-16027.

17. Hublin, J. J., Ben-Ncer, A., Bailey, S. E., Freidline, S. E., Neubauer, S.,
Skinner, M. M., ... & Gunz, P. (2017). New fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco and
the pan-African origin of Homo sapiens. Nature, 546(7657), 289-292.

18. Huerta-Sánchez, E., Jin, X., Asan, Bianba, Z., Peter, B. M., Vinckenbosch,
N., ... & Nielsen, R. (2014). Altitude adaptation in Tibetans caused by
introgression of Denisovan-like DNA. Nature, 512(7513), 194-197.

19. Johanson, D. C., & White, T. D. (1979). A systematic assessment of early

African hominids. Science, 203(4378), 321-330.

20. Larsen, C. S. (1995). Biological changes in human populations with agriculture.

Annual Review of Anthropology, 24(1), 185-213.

21. Leakey, L. S., Tobias, P. V., & Napier, J. R. (1964). A new species of the
genus Homo from Olduvai Gorge. Nature, 202(4927), 7-9.

22. Leakey, M. D., & Hay, R. L. (1979). Pliocene footprints in the Laetolil Beds at
Laetoli, northern Tanzania. Nature, 278(5702), 317-323.

23. Poznik, G. D., Henn, B. M., Yee, M. C., Sliwerska, E., Euskirchen, G. M., Lin,
A. A., ... & Bustamante, C. D. (2013). Sequencing Y chromosomes resolves
discrepancy in time to common ancestor of males versus females. Science, 341(6145),
562-565.

24. Reich, D., Green, R. E., Kircher, M., Krause, J., Patterson, N., Durand, E. Y.,
... & Pääbo, S. (2010). Genetic history of an archaic hominin group from Denisova
Cave in Siberia. Nature, 468(7327), 1053-1060.

25. Rightmire, G. P. (1998). Human evolution in the Middle Pleistocene: The role of
Homo heidelbergensis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 6(6),
218-227.

26. Sankararaman, S., Mallick, S., Dannemann, M., Prüfer, K., Kelso, J., Pääbo, S.,
... & Reich, D. (2014). The genomic landscape of Neanderthal ancestry in present-
day humans. Nature, 507(7492), 354-357.

27. Scheinfeldt, L. B., & Tishkoff, S. A. (2013). Recent human adaptation: genomic
approaches, interpretation and insights. Nature Reviews Genetics, 14(10), 692-702.

28. Senut, B., Pickford, M., Gommery, D., Mein, P., Cheboi, K., & Coppens, Y.
(2001). First hominid from the Miocene (Lukeino formation, Kenya). Comptes Rendus
de l'Académie des Sciences-Series IIA-Earth and Planetary Science, 332(2), 137-144.
29. Sponheimer, M., & Lee-Thorp, J. A. (1999). Isotopic evidence for the diet of an
early hominid, Australopithecus africanus. Science, 283(5400), 368-370.

30. Stringer, C. (2012). The status of Homo heidelbergensis (Schoetensack 1908).

Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 21(3), 101-107.

31. Stringer, C. B., & Andrews, P. (1988). Genetic and fossil evidence for the
origin of modern humans. Science, 239(4845), 1263-1268.

32. Thieme, H. (1997). Lower Palaeolithic hunting spears from Germany. Nature,
385(6619), 807-810.

33. Tishkoff, S. A., Reed, F. A., Ranciaro, A., Voight, B. F., Babbitt, C. C.,
Silverman, J. S., ... & Deloukas, P. (2007). Convergent adaptation of human lactase
persistence in Africa and Europe. Nature Genetics, 39(1), 31-40.

34. Turchin, M. C., Chiang, C. W., Palmer, C. D., Sankararaman, S., Reich, D., &
Hirschhorn, J. N. (2012). Evidence of widespread selection on standing variation in
Europe at height-associated SNPs. Nature Genetics, 44(9), 1015-1019.

35. Voight, B. F., Kudaravalli, S., Wen, X., & Pritchard, J. K. (2006). A map of
recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biology, 4(3), e72.

36. White, T. D., Asfaw, B., Beyene, Y., Haile-Selassie, Y., Lovejoy, C. O., Suwa,
G., & WoldeGabriel, G. (2009). Ardipithecus ramidus and the paleobiology of early
hominids. Science, 326(5949), 75-86.

37. Wrangham, R. (2009). Catching fire: How cooking made us human. Basic Books.