Scribd
Upload
5 views3 pages

Algorithm

Hierarchical deadlock detection is essential for managing resources in distributed systems organized in a hierarchy, preventing and resolving deadlocks through a structured approach. The algorithm utilizes a wait-for graph to track resource requests and employs cycle detection methods to identify deadlocks, followed by resolution strategies such as process termination or resource preemption. While it offers efficiency and scalability, challenges include the complexity of resource management and computational overhead.

Uploaded by

4213 SWARNA B CSE
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views3 pages

Algorithm

Hierarchical deadlock detection is essential for managing resources in distributed systems organized in a hierarchy, preventing and resolving deadlocks through a structured approach. The algorithm utilizes a wait-for graph to track resource requests and employs cycle detection methods to identify deadlocks, followed by resolution strategies such as process termination or resource preemption. While it offers efficiency and scalability, challenges include the complexity of resource management and computational overhead.

Uploaded by

4213 SWARNA B CSE
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Introduction

Hierarchical deadlock detection is crucial in distributed systems where resources are


organized in a hierarchy. This approach prevents and resolves deadlocks, ensuring efficient
resource allocation and system stability.

Key Concepts Resource Hierarchy:

o Resources are arranged in a hierarchical structure (e.g., a tree). Each resource


is assigned a unique level, and processes can only request resources from
lower levels in the hierarchy to maintain order.
2. Wait-For Graph:
o A wait-for graph represents processes and the resources they are waiting for.
Nodes represent processes, while directed edges indicate that a process is
waiting for a resource held by another process.
3. Deadlock:
o A deadlock occurs when a set of processes are waiting for resources held by
each other, forming a circular wait condition.
4. Cycle Detection:
o The algorithm relies on cycle detection within the wait-for graph to identify
deadlocks.

Algorithm Steps

1. Initialization:
o Create a wait-for graph for the system, initializing nodes for each process and
edges based on resource allocation and requests.
2. Resource Request Handling:
o When a process requests a resource:
 Immediate Grant: If the resource is available, grant it immediately.
 Wait: If not available, add an edge in the wait-for graph to indicate
that the process is waiting for that resource.
3. Update Wait-For Graph:
o Continuously update the wait-for graph with new requests and releases of
resources.
4. Cycle Detection:
o Implement cycle detection using Depth-First Search (DFS) or Tarjan’s
algorithm:
 Traverse the wait-for graph.
 If a back edge is found during traversal, a cycle exists, indicating a
deadlock.
5. Deadlock Resolution:
o Once a deadlock is detected:
 Process Termination: Choose a process to terminate to break the
deadlock.
 Resource Preemption: Optionally, resources can be preempted from
certain processes and reallocated.
6. Notification:
o Notify relevant processes about the resolution action taken, ensuring proper
cleanup.
Advantages Efficiency: By focusing on relevant subgraphs, the hierarchical approach
minimizes the search space and improves cycle detection speed.

 Scalability: The algorithm is suitable for large distributed systems where resources
and processes are numerous and can be efficiently managed through hierarchical
organization.

Challenges and Limitations

 Complexity in Resource Management: Managing hierarchical relationships can


become complex, particularly when resource levels change dynamically.
 Overhead: Maintaining the wait-for graph and performing cycle detection incurs
some computational overhead, which may impact performance.

Conclusion

The hierarchical deadlock detection algorithm provides an effective means of identifying and
resolving deadlocks in systems with hierarchical resource structures. By using a structured
approach to resource requests and cycle detection, it ensures that deadlocks are efficiently
managed, contributing to the overall reliability and performance of distributed systems.

Resource Hierarchy

R1

+------------------+------------------+

| |

R2 R3

| |

+---+---+ +---+---+

| | | |

R4 R5 R6 R7

Processes:

P1: Requests R2

P2: Requests R3

P3: Requests R5
P4: Requests R6

Wait-For Graph:

[ P1 ] ----> [ P4 ]

| |

| |

[ P2 ] ----> [ P3 ]

Explanation:

1. Resource Hierarchy:
o R1 is the top-level resource, with R2 and R3 below it. Each resource can have child
resources (like R4, R5, R6, R7) organized hierarchically.

2. Processes:
o P1 is requesting R2.
o P2 is requesting R3.
o P3 is requesting R5 (which is a child of R2).
o P4 is requesting R6 (which is a child of R3).

3. Wait-For Graph:
o Arrows indicate waiting relationships:
 P1 waits for P4 (waiting for resources held by P4).
 P2 waits for P3 (waiting for resources held by P3).
o This creates a potential cycle, indicating a deadlock.

You might also like