Week 3 Session 1 and 2
Week 3 Session 1 and 2
"Introduction to Research Writing" course, designed for 50-minute periods based on your two-session-
per-week, 15-week structure. These plans align with *Academic Writing: A Handbook for International
Students* by Stephen Bailey (5th ed.), focusing on research basics as outlined in your course. I’ve
included lectures, activities, handouts, and teaching strategies, keeping the content neutral while
providing space for you to integrate faith through your teaching style for an Adventist institution. The
plans build on Weeks 1 and 2, are beginner-friendly, and cater to diverse learners within the time
constraints.
---
**Duration**: 50 minutes
**Objective**: Students will learn to identify and locate credible academic sources using databases and
basic evaluation criteria, preparing them to support their essay outlines.
- **Lecture Slides**: PowerPoint or handout with source types and credibility tips (see below).
- **Handout 1**: "Finding Credible Sources" (source types + evaluation checklist, provided below).
- **Computer Access**: Classroom computers or students’ laptops (if possible) for database demo;
alternatively, use projector for live demo.
- **Collected Outlines**: Week 2, Session 2 assignment (1-page essay outline) to return with feedback.
1. **Opening (5 minutes)**
- **Activity**: Recap and connect.
- Return Week 2 outlines with brief feedback (e.g., “Clear thesis!” or “Add support here”).
- Ask: “What’s one thing your outline needs to make it stronger?” (1–2 responses).
- Transition: “Today, we’re finding sources to back up those ideas—research starts here.”
- Optional faith touchpoint: Brief prayer or remark (e.g., “Let’s seek truth in our work”) to set tone,
per your style.
- **Teaching Strategy**: Tie to prior work for continuity; question engages students; prayer hints at
integrity or purpose subtly.
- **Content**:
- Why sources matter: “Evidence makes your argument convincing” (Bailey, Part 3, Section 1).
- Types of sources:
- Credibility checklist:
- Publisher: Reputable?
- Tools: Databases (e.g., Google Scholar, library systems) vs. random web searches.
- **Delivery**: Slides with examples (e.g., journal article title vs. blog post) and checklist.
- **Teaching Strategy**: Concrete examples clarify types; checklist provides a practical tool; Q&A
encouraged (e.g., “What makes a source trustworthy?”).
- **Instructions**:
- Students search for 1 source related to their outline topic (e.g., “technology in education”).
- Alternative (no computers): Use pre-printed article titles on Handout 2 for evaluation practice.
- **Facilitation**: Circulate, prompting with “What keywords are you using?” or “Does this fit your
topic?”
- **Teaching Strategy**: Active learning via real-time search; demo scaffolds beginners; alternative
suits low-tech settings.
- **Activity**:
- 2–3 volunteers share their source and why it’s credible (write titles on board).
- **Teaching Strategy**: Sharing reinforces criteria; assignment bridges to Session 2; your close can
hint at truth-seeking (e.g., “Good research builds strong ideas”).
##### Handouts
- *Source Types*:
- *Credibility Checklist*:
- Author: Credentials?
- *Search Log*:
|----------|----------------------|-----------|------|-------------|---------------|
|1 | [Fill in] | [Fill in] | [Fill]| [e.g., journal] | [e.g., expert author] |
- *Instructions*: “Find 1 source related to your outline. Note details and check credibility.”
- *Alternative (No Computers)*: List 3 pre-selected titles (e.g., “Tech in Classrooms, Smith, 2020,
Journal”) for evaluation.
##### Assessment
- Informal: Participation in search activity and debrief (noted for 10% participation grade).
---
**Duration**: 50 minutes
**Objective**: Students will practice annotating a source to extract key ideas and evidence, preparing
them to use research in their essays.
- **Handout 3**: "Annotating a Source" (sample text + annotation guide, provided below).
1. **Opening (5 minutes)**
- Ask: “What’s one thing you learned about finding sources last time?” (1–2 responses).
- Transition: “Now that we’ve found sources, let’s learn how to use them—starting with note-taking.”
- Optional faith touchpoint: Brief prayer or comment (e.g., “Let’s dig into this with care”) to align with
your style.
- **Teaching Strategy**: Quick recall links sessions; transition sets purpose; prayer hints at diligence
subtly.
- **Content**:
- Purpose: “Notes capture key ideas and evidence for your essay” (Bailey, Part 3, Section 1).
- Annotation basics:
- Tips:
- Example: “Smith (2020) says hiking cuts stress by 15%—good for my ‘exercise boosts learning’
thesis.”
- **Teaching Strategy**: Short model shows process; tips keep it practical; relatable example ties to
Week 2.
- **Facilitation**: Prompt with “What’s the big idea here?” or “How could this fit your outline?”
- **Teaching Strategy**: Pair work eases into skill; solo practice builds independence; flexible source
use suits preparation levels.
- **Activity**:
- **Teaching Strategy**: Sharing reinforces skill; assignment connects to course; your close can hint at
clarity’s value (e.g., “Good notes make writing easier”).
##### Handout
“Studies show outdoor activity benefits students. Lee (2022) found that teens who walk daily score
10% higher on memory tests, likely due to increased oxygen flow to the brain. This aligns with earlier
research by Patel (2019), who noted exercise improves focus. However, not all agree—some argue
screen time aids learning more.”
- *Annotation Guide*:
1. Highlight: Main point (underline) + Evidence (circle).
2. Margin Note: Summarize in 1 sentence (e.g., “Exercise boosts memory and focus—Lee, 2022”).
3. Thesis Link: “How does this fit your outline?” (space for note).
##### Assessment
- Informal: Participation in annotation activity and debrief (noted for 10% participation grade).
---
- *Session 1*:
- *Session 2*:
- **Session 1**: During debrief, you might say, “Finding good sources is like seeking reliable wisdom,”
subtly nodding to truth or discernment per your Adventist style.
- **Session 2**: When modeling annotation, a comment like “Noting what matters helps us build
something useful” could hint at stewardship or focus.
### Notes
- **Tech Flexibility**: Session 1 adapts to computer access; projector demo works universally.
These plans are detailed, practical, and tied to Bailey’s textbook, offering a clear path from finding to
using sources. Let me know if you’d like tweaks—more examples, different activities, or anything else!
How can I further assist?