Topic 1 Slides
Topic 1 Slides
Big questions
What value systems can you identify at play in the causes
and approaches to resolving the issues addressed in this
topic?
How does your own value system compare with others
you have encountered in the context of issues raised in
this topic?
Understandings
Statement Guidance
1.1.U1 1.1.U1 Significant historical influences on 1: A variety of significant historical influences could
the development of the environmental be covered, but with a minimum of three in-depth
movement have come from literature, the media, examples. Possible examples could include: James
major environmental disasters, international Lovelock’s development of the Gaia hypothesis;
agreements and technological developments Minamata disaster; Rachel Carson’s book Silent
Spring (1962);, Davis Guggenheim’s documentary An
Inconvenient Truth (2006); Chernobyl disaster of
1986; Fukushima Daiihi nuclear disaster of 2011;
whaling; Bhopal disaster of 1984; Gulf of Mexico oil
spill of 2010; Chipko movement; Rio Earth Summit
2012 (Rio+20); Earth Day; Green Revolution;
Copenhagen Accord; recent or local events of
student interest.
2: In the range of historical influences selected, it is
beneficial to have both local and global examples.
Understandings
Statement Guidance
1.1.U2 An EVS is a worldview or paradigm that shapes A society is an arbitrary group of individuals who
the way an individual, or group of people, share some common characteristics, such as
perceives and evaluates environmental issues, geographical location, cultural background, historical
influenced by cultural, religious, economic and timeframe, religious perspective, value system and
socio-political contexts. so on.
1.1.U3 An EVS might be considered as a system in the EVSs are individual; there is no “wrong” EVS.
sense that it may be influenced by education,
experience, culture and media (inputs), and
involves a set of interrelated premises, values
and arguments that can generate consistent
decisions and evaluations (outputs).
1.1.U4 There is a spectrum of EVSs, from ecocentric
through anthropocentric to technocentric value
systems
Understandings
Statement Guidance
1.1.U5 An ecocentric viewpoint integrates social,
spiritual and environmental dimensions into a
holistic ideal. It puts ecology and nature as
central to humanity and emphasizes a less
materialistic approach to life with greater self-
sufficiency of societies. An ecocentric viewpoint
prioritizes biorights, emphasizes the importance
of education and encourages self-restraint in
human behaviour.
1.1.U6 An anthropocentric viewpoint argues that
humans must sustainably manage the global
system. This might be through the use of taxes,
environmental regulation and legislation. Debate
would be encouraged to reach a consensual,
pragmatic approach to solving environmental
problems.
Understandings
Statement Guidance
1.1.U7 A technocentric viewpoint argues that
technological developments can provide
solutions to environmental problems. This is a
consequence of a largely optimistic view of the
role humans can play in improving the lot of
humanity. Scientific research is encouraged in
order to form policies and to understand how
systems can be controlled, manipulated or
changed to solve resource depletion. A pro-
growth agenda is deemed necessary for society’s
improvement.
1.1.U8 There are extremes at either end of this
spectrum (for example, deep ecologists–
ecocentric to cornucopian–technocentric), but in
practice, EVSs vary greatly depending on cultures
and time periods, and they rarely fit simply or
perfectly into any classification.
1.1.U9 Different EVSs ascribe different intrinsic value to
components of the biosphere
Applications and Skills
Statement Guidance
1.1.U9 Different EVSs ascribe different intrinsic value to
components of the biosphere.
1.1.A1 Discuss the view that the environment can have
its own intrinsic value.
1.1.A2 Evaluate the implications of two contrasting EVSs
in the context of given environmental issues.
1.1.A3 Justify, using examples and evidence, how
historical influences have shaped the
development of the modern environmental
movement
Environmental Attitudes
Questionnaire
Consider these statements and decide if you agree strongly,
agree, don’t know, disagree or disagree strongly with each.
Give your reasons.
1. Humans are part of nature.
2. Humans are to blame for all the world’s
environmental problems.
3. We depend on the environment for our
resources.
4. Nomadic and indigenous peoples live in balance
with their environment.
5. Traditional farming methods do not damage the
environment.
Consider these statements and decide if you agree strongly,
agree, don’t know, disagree or disagree strongly with each.
Give your reasons.
• Deep Ecologists
– Nature more value than
humanity
– Not all resources are for
human use
– Seek a more holistic
view of the world
– Believe everyone should
be involved in making
environmental decisions
1.1.U6 An anthropocentric viewpoint argues that humans must
sustainably manage the global system
• Anthropocentrism-
People Centered
– Humans are
responsible for
sustainable global
systems through
control of population
and resource use
– 1. Environmental
Managers
• Economic growth and
resource use can
continue if adjustments
are made to policies
(taxes, laws…)
1.1.U7 A technocentric viewpoint argues that technological
developments can provide solutions to the environmental
problems
• Cornucopian
– World has infinite
resources
– Environmental issues not
a problem
– New resources and
technology will solve any
problem
– Humans come first
– Growth and capitalisms
Al Gore
“if he [i.e., Obama]‘s serious about it
[i.e., protecting the environment], he
needs to get a team in place and he
needs to present a plan, he needs to
use the bully pulpit, he needs to be a
vigorous advocate”
George W. Bush
• Buddhist
– Separation of body and soul
– Birth, aging, suffering and
death all conjoined in one
journey
– Humans are not self sufficient
or more important than the
Earth
• Judaeo-Christian
– Separation of body and soul,
matter and spirit
– Genesis demonstrates
stewardship of the Earth or
control?
– “Rule over the fish of the sea
and the birds of the air and
over every living creature that
moves on the ground’”
(Genesis 1:28
• Look into the details of how the disaster
came about.
• Analyze the series of events leading to the
disaster and its aftermath.
• Answer this question: How does this
environmental disaster affect present day
environmental movement?
• Don't it always seem to go
That you don't know what you've got til its
gone
They paved paradise
And put up a parking lot
• Hey farmer farmer
Put away the DDT
1.1.U1 Significant historical influences on the development of the
environmental movement have come from literature, the media,
major environmental disasters, international agreements and
technological developments
Silent Spring
• 1962
• Book by Rachel Carson in the
US
• Showed the link between
pesticides and ecosystem
health
• Raised awareness of pesticides
of the United States
• Resulted in the banning of DDT
Topic 1.5 and 2.3 link!
• Carson warned of the effects of pesticides
on insects, both pest and others and how
this was being passed along the food
chain to kill others.
• DDT (dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane) –
synthetic insecticides were finding their
way into people accumulating in the fatty
tissues causing cancer.
• Chemical industries try to ban the book
but many scientists shared the same
concerns.
Bhopal, India
• 1984
• Union Carbide pesticide plant
released poisonous methyl
isocyanate from the plant
• Thousands died within hours.
• About half a million people were
affected . Many survivors suffered
multiple disorders
• Brought about realization the ugly
side of industrialization in
impoverished areas
• Bhopal remains the worst
industrial disaster ever
• Since the disaster, India has experienced rapid
industrialization. While some positive changes
in government policy and behavior of a few
industries have taken place, major threats to
the environment from rapid and poorly
regulated industrial growth remain.
1.1.U1 Significant historical influences on the development of the
environmental movement have come from literature, the media,
major environmental disasters, international agreements and
technological developments
Fukushima, Japan
nuclear meltdown
• 2011
• Caused by an earthquake which
produced tsunami that caused
damage resulting in meltdown
of 3 reactors in the plant.
• Tsunami damaged nuclear plant
resulting in radiation releases
across the Pacific Ocean
• Renewed questions about safety
of nuclear energy
• Human health effects just now
coming in
Topic 7.1
Mercury and Minamata
• 1950’s Japan
• Suddenly people develop
acute mercury poisoning –
numbness, muscle
weakness, coma death
• Minamata disease – 2,300
officially recognized victims
• Chisso corporation dumping
methyl mercury into local
bay
• Biomagnification of Hg
through food chain into
people
1.1.U1 Significant historical influences on the development of the
environmental movement have come from literature, the media,
major environmental disasters, international agreements and
technological developments
Minamata, Japan
• 1959
• Caused by mercury poising
from factories polluting the
bay
• Symptoms included
convulsions, slurred speech,
loss of motor functions and
uncontrollable limb
movements.
• Demonstrated link between
human health and pollution
• Bioaccumulation and
biomagnification.
1.1.U1 Significant historical influences on the development of the
environmental movement have come from literature, the media,
major environmental disasters, international agreements and
technological developments
Here’s a list (not comprehensive) of
environmental disasters
• Aral Sea
• Chestnut Blight
• Australian Cane Toads
• Cuyahoga River
• Dutch Elm Disease
• Exxon Valdez
• 3 Gorges Dam
• Get Smog
• Coral Bleaching
• Great Plastic Island
Growth of the modern
environmental movement
ØNeolithic Agricultural
Revolution
(10,000 years ago)
Historical Influences
• All these events have helped to influence EVSs.
– Raised public awareness
– Provided media coverage
– Increased sense of stewardship over the Earth
– Impact local and global governments and
regulations
1.1.A3 Justify using examples and evidence, how historical
influences have shaped the development of the modern
environmental movement
n Environmental Issues
n Shortage of Water Supply
n Climate change
1. Influential individuals
2. Independent pressure groups
3. Corporate businesses
4. Governments
5. Intergovernmental bodies
Significant ideas: 1) A systems approach can help in the
study of complex environmental issues. 2) The use of
systems and models simplifies interactions but may
provide a more holistic view without reducing issues to
single processes
Big questions
What strengths and weaknesses of the systems approach
and the use of models have been revealed through this
topic?
How does a systems approach facilitate a holistic
approach to understanding?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of the systems
you have examined in this section?
What have you learned about models and how they can
be used, for example, to predict climate change? Do their
benefits outweigh their limitations?
Understandings
Statement Guidance
1.2..U1 A systems approach is a way of visualizing a Guidance: A systems approach should be taken for all
complex set of interactions which may be the topics covered in the ESS
ecological or societal. course
1.2.U2 These interactions produce the emergent EVSs are individual; there is no “wrong” EVS.
properties of the system
1.2.U3 The concept of a system can be applied at a
range of scales.
Useful for
understanding and
explaining
phenomena's
Advantages Disadvantages
• Can predict and simplify • May not be accurate
complex systems • Rely on the expertise of those
• Inputs can be changed and making it
outputs examined without • Different people may interpret
waiting for real events them in different ways
• Results can be shown to others • Vested interests may hijack
them politically
• Only as good as the data that
goes in
• Different models may show
different effects with same data
1.2.U3 The concept of a system can be applied at a range of
scales
Boundaries Lines
• In photosynthesis,
light energy is
transformed to
chemical energy in
glucose, which is
then transformed to
mechanical and
thermal energy when
eaten by consumers
1.2.U16 The flows are processes that may be either transfers (a
change in location) or transformations (a change in chemical
nature, a change in state or a change in energy
• Transfers are
simple: an organism
or process relocates
matter or energy
– Crops removed
from the farm
and taken to
market
– Individuals or
populations
migrate in/out of
an area
1.2.U16 The flows are processes that may be either transfers (a
change in location) or transformations (a change in chemical
nature, a change in state or a change in energy
• Matter transformations: -
– Solid – Liquid – Gas
• Precipitation strikes the
ground and runs off to a
stream
– transfer
• Stream water evaporates
into the atmosphere
– transformation
1.2.U17 In system diagrams, storages are usually represented as
rectangular boxes and flows as arrows, with the direction of eh
arrow indicating the direction of each flow. The size of the boxes
and the arrows may be representative of the size/magnitude of the
storage or flow
1.2.U8 An open system exchanges both energy and matter across
its boundary while a closed system exchanges only energy across
its boundary
• Open system: a
system in which both
materials and energy
are exchanged across
the boundaries of the
system
• Most common system
• Example: Rainforest,
Ecosystems
1.2.U8 An open system exchanges both energy and matter across
its boundary while a closed system exchanges only energy across
its boundary
• Forest ecosystem:
• Plants fix light via
photosynthesis
• Air nitrogen is fixed by soil
bacteria
• Herbivores may graze in other
ecosystems
• Forest fires expose soil to
erosion
• Minerals are leached by rain
• Water is lost in evaporation
• Eat is exchanged with
surrounding environment
1.2.U8 An open system exchanges both energy and matter across
its boundary while a closed system exchanges only energy across
its boundary
https://safeYouTube.net/w/YO9S
Biosphere 2
1.2.U9 An isolated system is a hypothetical concept in which
neither energy nor matter is exchanged across the boundary
1.2.U10 Ecosystems are open systems; closed systems only exist
experimentally, although the global geochemical cycles
approximate to closed systems
1.2.A1 Construct a system diagram or a model from a given set of
information
• Here is a
systems diagram
of energy
consumption
patterns in the
US (2015)
• Note how the
size of each
storage (box)
and flow (arrow)
corresponds
with the
magnitude of
the component
1.2.A2 Evaluate the use of models as a tool in a given situation,
for example, climate change predictions
An example of the
concept of energy flow
through trophic levels
of a food chain
1.3.U1 The first law of thermodynamics is the principle of
conservation of energy, which states that energy in an isolated
system can be transformed but cannot be created or destroyed
• Steady-state equilibrium
– Maintains a stable system due to constant flow of
inputs and outputs
– Ecological system requires inputs and outputs in
order to function. .
1.3.U5 As an open system, an ecosystem will normally exist in a
stable equilibrium, either in a steady-state of equilibrium or in one
developing over time (for example, successions), and maintained
by stabilizing negative feedback loops
• Static equilibrium
– Doesn‘t’apply to natural systems as there are no
inputs or outputs so no change occurs.
– Always in balance
– Inanimate objects
1.3.U5 As an open system, an ecosystem will normally exist in a
stable equilibrium, either in a steady-state of equilibrium or in one
developing over time (for example, successions), and maintained
by stabilizing negative feedback loops
• Positive Feedback
– Amplifies change and leads to deviation from stability
– Diverges from the equilibrium
– Change in X causes a change in Y which causes a bigger change
in X
Principals of Positive and Negative Feedback
Resilience of
System
• It measures how it respond to a
disturbance
• The capacity of an
ecosystem to respond
to a disturbance.
• Negative feedback
• More complex, more
feedback looks more
resilient
• Absorb disturbance
without shifting to an
alternative state and
losing function and
services. conditions
Example of Resilience
Eucalypt forest
• Fire is seen as a major
hazard in a Eucalypt
forest of Australia.
• Eucalypts have
evolved to survive
forest fires.
• The trees regenerate
quickly after a fire
because they have
buds within their
trunks.
Factors affecting
ecosystem resilience
• Diverse and complex ecosystem
• Greater species biodiversity
• Greater genetic diversity
• Ability to shift geographical ranges
• Larger ecosystem
• Climate
• Rate of reproduction
• Human intervention
1.3.U9 Diversity and the size of storages within systems can
contribute to their resilience and affect their speed of response to
change (time lags).
• At a particular
moment in time,
a small change
within a global
climate system
can transform a
relatively stable
system to a very
different state of
the climate
1.3.U10 Humans can affect the resilience of systems through
reducing these storages and diversity
• Describe the
permanent change
from equilibrium
resulting from a
tipping point being
passed in one of the
feedback loops
1.3.U11 The delays involved in feedback loops make it difficult to
predict tipping points and add to the complexity of modelling
system
1.3.A1 Explain the implications of the laws of thermodynamics to
ecological systems
1.3.A2 Discuss the resilience in a variety of systems
1.3.A3 Evaluate the possible consequences of tipping points
Significant ideas:
1) All systems can be viewed through the lens of
sustainability.
2) Sustainable development meets the needs of the
present without compromising the ability of future
generations to meet their own needs.
3) Environmental indicators and ecological footprints can
be used to assess sustainability.
4) Environmental impact assessments (EIAs) play an
important role in sustainable development
Big questions:
• What strengths and weaknesses of the systems
approach and the use of models have been through this
topic?
• What have you learned about sustainability and
sustainable development in this chapter?
• What are the differences between sustainability and
sustainable development?
• Ecological Footprint is a model used to estimate the
demands that human populations place on the
environment; what are the limitations and benefits of
these models
• How do EIAs ensure that development is sustainable?
Understandings
Statement Guidance
1.4..U1 Sustainability is the use and management of
resources that allows full natural replacement of
the resources exploited and full recovery of the
ecosystems affected by their extraction and use.
1.4.U2 Natural capital is a term used for natural
resources that can produce a sustainable natural
income of goods or services
1.4.U3 Natural income is the yield obtained from natural You need to be able to explain the relationship
resources between natural capital, natural income and
sustainability, and discuss the value of ecosystem
services to a society.
1.4.U4 Ecosystems may provide life-supporting services
such as water replenishment, flood and erosion
protection, and goods such as timber, fisheries,
and agricultural crops.
Understandings
Statement Guidance
1.4.U5 Factors such as biodiversity, pollution, population You need to be able to discuss how environmental
or climate may be used quantitatively as indicators (such as Millennium Ecosystem
environmental indicators of sustainability. These Assessment) can be used to evaluate the progress of
factors can be applied on a range of scales, from a project to increase sustainability.
local to global. The Millennium Ecosystem
Assessment (MA) gave a scientific appraisal of
the condition and trends in the world’s
ecosystems and the services they provide using
environmental indicators, as well as the scientific
basis for action to conserve and use them
sustainably
1.4.U6 EIAs incorporate baseline studies before a
development project is undertaken. They assess
the environmental, social and economic impacts
of the project, predicting and evaluating possible
impacts and suggesting mitigation strategies for
the project. They are usually followed by an audit
and continued monitoring. Each country or
region has different guidance on the use of EIAs.
Understandings
Statement Guidance
1.4.U7 EIAs provide decision-makers with information in
order to consider the environmental impact of a
project. There is not necessarily a requirement to
implement an EIA’s proposals, and many socio-
economic factors may influence the decisions
made.
• Natural income:
– is like the interest earned on a savings account. It is
the natural capital gained from the standing stock of
resources
– Natural resources taken do not exceed the
environment’s capacity to disperse, absorb, recycle or
otherwise neutralize their harmful effects
Ex. Agricultural harvest
– New tree growth
– Births of livestock or within wild populations
1.4.U2 Natural capital is a term used for natural resources that
can produce a sustainable natural income of goods or services
1.4.U3 Natural income is the yield obtained from natural resources
Economic view of Natural Resources
• Traditional economy based on land, labor and capital
• See environment as only one set of resources within a
larger economic sphere
• Environmental economists view environment as
providing goods and services on which humans depend
• Economy is constrained by limits of environmental
resources
• Environment provides raw materials and means of
absorbing wastes
1.4.U2 Natural capital is a term used for natural resources that
can produce a sustainable natural income of goods or services
1.4.U3 Natural income is the yield obtained from natural resources
Economic Activity: Classic View
1.4.U2 Natural capital is a term used for natural resources that
can produce a sustainable natural income of goods or services
1.4.U3 Natural income is the yield obtained from natural resources
Economic Activity: Environmental View
1.4.U1 Sustainability is the use and management of resources
that allows full natural replacement of the resources exploited and
full recovery of the ecosystems affected by their extraction and
use
Sustainability
– Harvesting renewable or replenishable resources
at a rate that will be replaced by natural growth.
– Long term harvest (or pollution or destruction)
rate must not exceed rate of natural capital
renewal
1.4.U1 Sustainability is the use and management of resources
that allows full natural replacement of the resources exploited and
full recovery of the ecosystems affected by their extraction and
use
Tripled since
The EF is not the area
occupied by a population.
1960
It is a measure of the
theoretical amount of land
needed to provide
everything for that
population, even things
imported from elsewhere
1.4.U9 An ecological footprint (EF) is the area of land and water
required to sustainably provide all resources at the rate at which
they are being consumed by a given population. If the EF is
greater than the area available to the population, this is an
indication of unsustainability
Components of the
Ecological Footprint
• Growing crops
• Grazing animals
• Harvesting timber
• Catching fish
• Accommodating
infrastructure
• Absorbing carbon dioxide
emissions
Components of the Ecological
Footprint
(six components used to calculate a
country’s ecological footprint)
Allows
direct
comparison
between
LEDCs and
MEDCs
1.4.U9 An ecological footprint (EF) is the area of land and water
required to sustainably provide all resources at the rate at which
they are being consumed by a given population. If the EF is
greater than the area available to the population, this is an
indication of unsustainability
1.4.U5 Factors such as biodiversity, pollution, population or
climate may be used quantitatively as environmental indicators of
sustainability. These factors can be applied on a range of scales,
from local to global. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA)
gave a scientific appraisal of the condition and trends in the
world’s ecosystems and the services they provide using
environmental indicators, as well as the scientific basis for action
to conserve and use them sustainably
Biodiversity: Use a tool such as the
Greater diversity means Simpson’s diversity
greater ecosystem index to quantify
stability. This means the diversity
ecosystems can better
withstand changes which Quantifying diversity
will result in being more helps people make
sustainable decisions regarding
conservation actions
1.4.U5 Factors such as biodiversity, pollution, population or
climate may be used quantitatively as environmental indicators of
sustainability. These factors can be applied on a range of scales,
from local to global. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA)
gave a scientific appraisal of the condition and trends in the
world’s ecosystems and the services they provide using
environmental indicators, as well as the scientific basis for action
to conserve and use them sustainably
Pollution: Pollution may change
Less pollution will lower ecosystems'’ abiotic
the impact on organisms factors beyond the
which will result in being organisms/ optimal
more sustainable range of survival
1.4.U5 Factors such as biodiversity, pollution, population or
climate may be used quantitatively as environmental indicators of
sustainability. These factors can be applied on a range of scales,
from local to global. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA)
gave a scientific appraisal of the condition and trends in the
world’s ecosystems and the services they provide using
environmental indicators, as well as the scientific basis for action
to conserve and use them sustainably
Populations: More people use more
• Increasing human population resources, thereby
will create more environmental increasing a
pressure resulting in being less population’s ecological
sustainable. footprint
• Increasing plant/animal More plants and
populations will create a more animals provide more
stable ecosystem resulting in a energy and nutrient
more sustainable environment pathways
1.4.U5 Factors such as biodiversity, pollution, population or
climate may be used quantitatively as environmental indicators of
sustainability. These factors can be applied on a range of scales,
from local to global. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA)
gave a scientific appraisal of the condition and trends in the
world’s ecosystems and the services they provide using
environmental indicators, as well as the scientific basis for action
to conserve and use them sustainably
Climate: • The environment chooses which
Stable levels of organisms are best adapted for
greenhouse gases survival (natural selection)
means stable • A changing environment
temperatures which increases selective pressures on
leads to more organisms, making them less
sustainable ecosystem likely to survive
1.4.U5 Factors such as biodiversity, pollution, population or
climate may be used quantitatively as environmental indicators of
sustainability. These factors can be applied on a range of scales,
from local to global. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA)
gave a scientific appraisal of the condition and trends in the
world’s ecosystems and the services they provide using
environmental indicators, as well as the scientific basis for action
to conserve and use them sustainably
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
(MA)
• It is an international
assessment of the effects of
human activity on the
environment, which give a
scientific appraisal of the
condition of the worlds
ecosystem.
• The United Nations Secretary –
General Kofi Annan called for
MA in 2000 and was initiated in
2001
Key facts reported are:
• 60% of worlds ecosystem have been degraded
• About 25% of the Earth’s land surface is now
cultivated
• We use 40-50% of all the available surface
water and water withdrawals from the
underground sources have doubled over the
past 40 years
• Over 25% of all fish stocks are overharvested
• Since 1980, about 35% of mangroves have
been destroyed
• About 20% of corals have been lost in 20
years and another 20% degraded
• Nutrient pollution has led to eutrophication of
waters and dead coastal zones
• Species extinction rates are now 100-1000
times above the background rate
• We have had more effects on the ecosystems
of earth in the last 50 years than ever before.
1.4.U5 Factors such as biodiversity, pollution, population or
climate may be used quantitatively as environmental indicators of
sustainability. These factors can be applied on a range of scales,
from local to global. The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
(MEA) gave a scientific appraisal of the condition and trends in the
world’s ecosystems and the services they provide using
environmental indicators, as well as the scientific basis for action
to conserve and use them sustainably
Aim of the MA is to assess the consequences of ecosystem changes for human well-
being
Findings:
•Humans are using natural resources unsustainably
•60% of the world’s ecosystems have been degraded
•This has resulted in a decrease of biodiversity on Earth
•Short term economic gains at expense of some social groups and the environment
•The degradation of ecosystem services could grow significantly worse during the
first of this century and is a barrier to achieving the MDGs
http:://millenniumassessment.org
• Overall, human actions are depleting
Earths natural capital at a faster rate
that it is store, which is putting much
strain on the environment that the
ability of the planet’s ecosystems to
sustain future generations can no
longer taken for granted.
• However, the MA indicates that it may
be possible to reverse the changes as
long as appropriate actions are taken
quickly.
Some recommendations were to:
• Remove subsidies to agriculture,
fisheries and energy sources that harm
the environment
• Encourage landowners to manage
property in ways that enhance the
supply of ecosystem services such as
carbon storage and generation of fresh
water.
• Protect more areas from development,
especially in the oceans.
“He who slaughters
his cows today
shall thirst for milk
tomorrow”
Muslim proverb
Where did EIAs come
from?
• In 1969, the US Government passed the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).
• NEPA made it a priority for federal agencies
to consider the natural environment in any
land use planning.
• Within 20 years of NEPA becoming law in the
US, many other countries also included EIAs
as part of their planning policy.
1.4.U6 EIAs incorporate baseline studies before a development
project is undertaken. They assess the environmental, social and
economic impacts of the project, predicting and evaluating
possible impacts and suggesting mitigation strategies for the
project. They are usually followed by an audit and continued
monitoring. Each country or region has different guidance on the
use of EIAs.
1.4.U6 EIAs incorporate baseline studies before a development
project is undertaken. They assess the environmental, social and
economic impacts of the project, predicting and evaluating
possible impacts and suggesting mitigation strategies for the
project. They are usually followed by an audit and continued
monitoring. Each country or region has different guidance on the
use of EIAs.
1.4.U6 EIAs incorporate baseline studies before a development
project is undertaken. They assess the environmental, social and
economic impacts of the project, predicting and evaluating
possible impacts and suggesting mitigation strategies for the
project. They are usually followed by an audit and continued
monitoring. Each country or region has different guidance on the
use of EIAs.
• Scoping - Baseline study-
What are the
– Environmental impacts
– Social impacts
– Economics impacts
1.4.U6 EIAs incorporate baseline studies before a development
project is undertaken. They assess the environmental, social and
economic impacts of the project, predicting and evaluating
possible impacts and suggesting mitigation strategies for the
project. They are usually followed by an audit and continued
monitoring. Each country or region has different guidance on the
use of EIAs.
• Baseline looks at
– Environmental
• Ecology • Geology
– Habitat type and abundance – Land use
– Species list – Soil
– Species diversity – Hydrology
– List of endangered species
1.4.U6 EIAs incorporate baseline studies before a development
project is undertaken. They assess the environmental, social and
economic impacts of the project, predicting and evaluating
possible impacts and suggesting mitigation strategies for the
project. They are usually followed by an audit and continued
monitoring. Each country or region has different guidance on the
use of EIAs.
• Baseline looks at
– Social – Economics
• Human population • Cost
• Noise • Benefit
• Traffic • Jobs created
• Visual appearance
• Health
1.4.U6 EIAs incorporate baseline studies before a development
project is undertaken. They assess the environmental, social and
economic impacts of the project, predicting and evaluating
possible impacts and suggesting mitigation strategies for the
project. They are usually followed by an audit and continued
monitoring. Each country or region has different guidance on the
use of EIAs.
• Mitigation strategies –
How to reduce the
– Environmental impacts
– Social impacts
– Economics impacts
1.4.U6 EIAs incorporate baseline studies before a development
project is undertaken. They assess the environmental, social and
economic impacts of the project, predicting and evaluating
possible impacts and suggesting mitigation strategies for the
project. They are usually followed by an audit and continued
monitoring. Each country or region has different guidance on the
use of EIAs.
• Implementation –
Putting the strategies
into action
– Follow the approved
plan
– Continued measurement
1.4.U6 EIAs incorporate baseline studies before a development
project is undertaken. They assess the environmental, social and
economic impacts of the project, predicting and evaluating
possible impacts and suggesting mitigation strategies for the
project. They are usually followed by an audit and continued
monitoring. Each country or region has different guidance on the
use of EIAs.
• Monitoring &
evaluation – Assessing
the impacts
– Were impacts as
predicted
– Is it necessary to assess
after the project
1.4.U9 An ecological footprint (EF) is the area of land and water
required to sustainably provide all resources at the rate at which
they are being consumed by a given population. If the EF is
greater than the area available to the population, this is an
indication of unsustainability
http://www.overshootday.org
1.4.U9 An ecological footprint (EF) is the area of land and water
required to sustainably provide all resources at the rate at which
they are being consumed by a given population. If the EF is
greater than the area available to the population, this is an
indication of unsustainability
Weaknesses Benefits
• Difficult to collect a full data set • Provides some analysis to
• May be limited by the quality of change
the baseline • Any improvements outweighs
• Often focuses on biophysical the uncertainty of EIAs
issues
• Improve long-term viability
• Hard to quantify damage to
environment • Offers alternative projects
• Hard to identify indirect impacts • Opportunity to learn from
• Expensive experience of similar projects
• Not always addressed in an • Depends who does the EIA
integrated way • Certain countries often ignore
the EIA findings
1.4.A5 Explain the relationship between EFs and sustainability
Pollution is
• Adding something to an environment
• Made or caused by human activity
• Added faster than it can be treated
• Affects organisms
Classification
• Matter (solids, liquids gases)
• Organic (containing carbon) - sewage
• Non-organic - plastics
1.5.U2 Pollutants may be in the form of organic or inorganic
substances, light, sound or thermal energy, biological agents or
invasive species, and may derive from a wide range of human
activities including the combustion of fossil fuels
Biological agents
1.5.U2 Pollutants may be in the form of organic or inorganic
substances, light, sound or thermal energy, biological agents or
invasive species, and may derive from a wide range of human
activities including the combustion of fossil fuels
Invasive species
1.5.U2 Pollutants may be in the form of organic or inorganic
substances, light, sound or thermal energy, biological agents or
invasive species, and may derive from a wide range of human
activities including the combustion of fossil fuels
1.5.U2 Pollutants may be in the form of organic or inorganic
substances, light, sound or thermal energy, biological agents or
invasive species, and may derive from a wide range of human
activities including the combustion of fossil fuels
Fossil Fuels
1.5.U2 Pollutants may be in the form of organic or inorganic
substances, light, sound or thermal energy, biological agents or
invasive species, and may derive from a wide range of human
activities including the combustion of fossil fuels
Human activities
1.5.U2 Pollutants may be in the form of organic or inorganic
substances, light, sound or thermal energy, biological agents or
invasive species, and may derive from a wide range of human
activities including the combustion of fossil fuels
Case Study
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
– Fossiloffuels
Sources - release greenhouse
Pollution
gases, can contribute to respiratory
problems and acid rain
– Domestic waste - food waste,
sewage, rubbish (glass, plastics,
paper, wood, metals)
– Industrial waste - heavy metals,
heat (in air and/or water), acids
– Agricultural waste - fertilizers,
animal waste, and pesticides
contaminate water sources
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
Point source or non-point source?
Point vs. Nonpoint
NONPOINT SOURCES
Rural homes
Animal feedlot
Suburban POINT
development SOURCES
Factory
Wastewater
treatment
plant
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
• Point source:
• Examples
– Drainage pipe
– Leaking storage tank
– Factory chimney
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
• Point source:
• Regulation is simpler
– Localized
– Often a single party is
responsible
– One jurisdiction
Point Source Pollution
Example Challenges for management
Effluent from sewage Easily identifiable, enforce laws against polluters, monitor
pipe and measure types of pollution and its effects
Discharge from Easily identifiable, enforce laws against polluters, monitor
smokestack from a and measure types of pollution and its effects. Enforce
factory containment or conversion, i.e. scrubbers
Exhaust from tailpipe of Easily identifiable but with the enormous number of tail
car pipes this becomes very difficult, enforce and make more
stringent the emission laws, encourage alternatives such as
electric cars, hybrids
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
• Non-point source:
• Pollution which cannot
be traced back to a
single origin or source
(ex. storm water
runoff, water runoff
from urban areas and
failed septic systems).
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
• Non-point source:
– Examples
• Agricultural runoff
• Vehicle exhaust
• Industrial emissions
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
• Non-point source:
– Regulation is more
challenging
• Identify multiple
sources
• Who is responsible
• Different legal
jurisdictions
• Large-scale
intervention
Non-Point Source Pollution
Example Challenges for management
Fertilizer run-off, Difficult to identify source. Difficult to enforce or to
pesticide and herbicide remediate
run-off
Animal and Human Difficult to identify source. Difficult to enforce or to
waste remediate
Strom sewer discharge
into water ways
containing oil, grease,
slat, etc.
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
• Persistent Organic
Pollutants (POPs)
– Can’t be broken down
by living organisms
– Passed along food
chains as a result
– Concentrations build
with each higher
tropic level resulting
in biomagnification
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
• Persistent Organic
Pollutants (POPs)
– resistant to
environmental
degradation through
chemical, biological,
and photolytic
processes.
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
• Persistent Organic
Pollutants (POPs)
– Examples
• Heavy metals
• Older pesticides such
as DDT
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
• Biodegradable
– capable of being
decomposed by
bacteria or other
living organisms
– Does not build up in
individuals or get
passed along food
chains
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
• Biodegradable
– Examples
• Sewage
• Food waste
• Most modern
pesticides
• Degradable plastic
bags
1.5.U3 Pollution may be nonpoint or point source persistent or
biodegradable, acute or chronic
• Secondary
– Formation of acid rain
– Formation of smog
– Formation of ozone
Pollution management strategies can be applied at different levels
Measuring Pollution
• Directly
– Water/soil pollution
• Nitrates and phosphates
• Organic matter or bacteria
• Heavy metals
– Air pollution
• Acidity of rainwater
• Amount of fas in the
atmosphere
• Amount of particles
emitted by a diesel engine
Pollution management strategies can be applied at different levels
Measuring pollution
• Indirect
– Abiotic factors
• Dissolved oxygen
– Biotic factors
• Lichen on trees
• Invertebrates in the
water
Pollution management strategies can be applied at different levels
• Level 2 - Preventing or
regulating the
production/release of pollutants
– Legislation and regulation
(emissions standards for cars
– Develop technology for extracting
pollutants
– Monitoring is easy
– Strategy fails to fully address the
problem because pollutant is still
being produced
Pollution management strategies can be applied at different levels
• Level 3 - Working to
clean up or restore
damaged ecosystems
– Last resort, there is
already an impact
– Removing pollutant
from ecosystem (think
trash)
– Replanting/restocking
lost or depleted
populations
Pollution management strategies can be applied at different levels
Pollution management strategies can be applied at different levels
• Cultural
– Impoverished pollute
less because they
consume less
– Subsistence farmers
may pollute less
because they have
more intimate
relationship with land
Pollution management strategies can be applied at different levels
• Political
– Weak regulations and
lack of enforcement in
LEDCs (i.e. Nigeria’s oil
delta
– Strong corporate
involvmenet and
lobbying in policy
decisions in MEDCs (i.e.
US Congress)
Pollution management strategies can be applied at different levels
Case Study
• American Bald Eagle
– Common through North America
– Reduced to as few as 400 nesting pairs by 1960s
– Decline caused by habitat loss and widespread us
or DDT
– Toxins accumulate in fatty tissue of adults
– Egg shells too thin to survive
1.5.U5 Dichlorodiphenyltrichlorethane (DDT) exemplifies a conflict
between the utility of a “pollutant” and its effect on the
environment.
1.5.A2 Evaluate the effectiveness of each of the three different
levels of intervention, with reference to figure 3
• Task
– What are the pros and cons?
– What are the successes?
– What are the problems?
– Which are more important
– Be careful in looking at
sources. Are they biased? Can
they substantiate their claims
1.5.S1 Construct system diagrams to show the impact of
pollutants