Main
Main
79.
P L α P L α P L
(a) P = bLα K 1−α ⇒ K
=b K
⇒ ln K = ln b K
⇒ ln K = ln b + α ln K
y = 0.75x + 0.01
(c) We have α = 0.75 and ln b = 0.01 ⇒ b = e0.01 ≈ 1.01. Thus, the Cobb-
Douglas production function is:
As the table shows, the values of f (x, y) approach −2.5 as (x, y) approaches
the origin. This suggests that:
While
02 03 + 03 02 − 5 −5
lim f (x, y) = = ,
(x,y)→(0,0) 2−0·0 2
verifying our guess.
5. lim f (x, y) = 5x3 − x2 y 2 = 5(1)3 − 12 22 = 1
(x,y)→(1,2)
43.
sin(xy) , if (x, y) ̸= (0, 0)
f (x, y) = xy
1, if (x, y) = (0, 0)
sin(xy)
If xy ̸= 0, then x ̸= 0 and y ̸= 0, so is continuous as a product of
xy
continuous functions. Now, if p = (x0 , 0) where x0 ̸= 0, then
(x, y) → (x0 , 0) ⇒ xy → 0 · x0 = 0.
With this, you can compute the limit as xy → 0, which is 1, and prove continuity
on the x-axis. Apply the same argument to points (0, y0 ) where y0 ̸= 0, and for
p = (0, 0), show that f is continuous on the y-axis and at the origin, respectively.
1
f (x, y) 0.5
0
−2 2
0 0
x 2 −2 y
(
0 if y ≤ 0 or y ≥ x4
44. (a) f (x, y) =
1 if 0 < y < x4
Consider the path y = mxa , 0 < a < 4. (The path does not pass through (0, 0) if
a a a
(≤ 0 except while m = 0.] If mx ≤ 0 then f (x, mx ) = 0. If mx > 0 then:
a
mxa = |m||xa | 4
a 4
⇐⇒ |m| |xa | ≥ x4 ⇐⇒ |xxa | ≤ |m| ⇐⇒ |x|4−a ≤ |m|
mx ≥ x
whenever xa is defined. Then mxa ≥ x4 ⇐⇒ |x| ≤ |m|1/(4−a) so f (x, mxa ) = 0
for |x| ≤ |m|1/(4−a) and f (x, y) → 0 as (x, y) → (0, 0) along this path.
(b) If we approach (0, 0) along the path y = x5 , x > 0, then we have f (x, x5 ) = 1
for 0 < x < 1 because 0 < x5 < x4 there. Thus f (x, y) → 1 as (x, y) →
(0, 0) along this path, but in part (a) we found a limit of 0 along other paths, so
lim(x,y)→(0,0) f (x, y) doesn’t exist and f is discontinuous at (0, 0).
(c) First we show that f is discontinuous at any point (a, 0) on the x-axis. If we
approach (a, 0) along the path x = a, y > 0, then f (a, y) = 1 for 0 < y < a4 ,
so f (x, y) → 1 as (x, y) → (a, 0) along this path. If we approach (a, 0) along the
path x = a, y < 0 then f (a, y) = 0 since y < 0 and f (x, y) → 0 as (x, y) → (a, 0).
Thus the limit does not exist and f is discontinuous on the line y = 0. f is also
discontinuous on the curve y = x4 : For any point (a, a4 ) on this curve, approaching
the point along the path x = a, y > a4 gives f (a, y) = 0 since y > a4 , so f (x, y) → 0
as (x, y) → (a, a4 ). But approaching the point along the path x = a, y < a4 gives
f (a, y) = 1 for y > 0, so f (x, y) → 1 as (x, y) → (a, a4 ), and the limit does not
exist there.
(b) For a fixed wind speed v, the values of the wind-chill index W increase as
∂W
temperature T increases, so is positive.
∂T
For a fixed temperature T , the values of W decrease (or remain constant) as
∂W
v increases, so is negative (or 0).
∂v
(c) For fixed values of T , the function values f (T, v) appear to become constant
(or nearly constant) as v increases, so the corresponding rate of change is 0
or near 0 as v increases.
∂W
lim = 0.
v→∞ ∂v
5.
(a) The graph of f increases as we move in the positive x-direction. Thus fx (1, 2)
is positive.
(b) The graph of f decreases as we move in the positive y-direction. Thus fy (1, 2)
is negative.
6.
(a) The graph of f decreases as we move in the positive x-direction, so fx (−1, 2)
is negative.
(b) The graph of f decreases as we move in the positive y-direction, so fy (−1, 2)
is negative.
7.
(a) fx is negative at (−1, 2) and if we move in the positive x-direction, the surface
becomes less steep. Thus fx are increasing and fxx (−1, 2) is positive.
(b) fy is negative at (−1, 2) and if we move in the positive y-direction, the surface
becomes steeper. Thus fy are decreasing, and fyy (−1, 2) is negative.
8.
(a) fx is positive at (1, 2) and if we move in the positive y-direction, the surface
becomes steeper. Thus fx are increasing and fxy (1, 2) is positive.
(b) fx is negative at (−1, 2) and if we move in the positive y-direction, the surface
gets steeper. Thus fx are decreasing and fxy (−1, 2) is negative.
9. a is the graph of fy , because when we start at (3, −3) and move in the positive
y-direction, both graph b and c decreases while a increases, and a is 0 at where
both b and c have a low point at (3,-1.5). Start at (3,1.5) and move in negative
x-direction, b traces out a line with a negative slope with c traces out a downward
parabola, so b is the x-derivative of c. So b is graph of fx and c is graph of f.
16.
fx (x, y) = 4x3 · y 3 + 8 · 2x · y = 4x3 y 3 + 16xy,
fy (x, y) = x4 · 3y 2 + 8x2 · 1 = 3x4 y 2 + 8x2
17.
fx (x, t) = e−t (− sin πx)(π) = −πe−t sin πx,
ft (x, t) = e−t (−1) cos πx = −e−t cos πx
18.
1 ln t
fx (x, t) = x−1/2 ln t = √ ,
2 2 x
√
√ 1 x
ft (x, t) = x · =
t t
19.
∂z
= 10(2x + 3y)9 · 2 = 20(2x + 3y)9 ,
∂x
∂z
= 10(2x + 3y)9 · 3 = 30(2x + 3y)9
∂y
20.
∂z
= (sec2 xy)(y) = y sec2 xy,
∂x
∂z
= (sec2 xy)(x) = x sec2 xy
∂y
21.
fx (x, y) = y −1 = 1/y,
fy (x, y) = −xy −2 = −x/y 2
45.
f (x + h, y) − f (x, y) (x + h)y 2 − (x + h)3 y − (xy 2 − x3 y)
fx (x, y) = lim = lim
h→0 h h→0 h
h(y 2 − 3x2 y − 3xhy − yh2 )
= lim = lim (y 2 − 3x2 y − 3xyh − yh2 ) = y 2 − 3x2 y
h→0 h h→0
46.
x+h x
f (x + h, y) − f (x, y) x+h+y 2
− x+y 2 (x + h)(x + y 2 ) − x(x + h + y 2 )
fx (x, y) = lim = lim = lim
h→0 h h→0 h h→0 h(x + h + y 2 )(x + y 2 )
x + y2 y2
= lim =
h→0 (x + h + y 2 )(x + y 2 ) (x + y 2 )2
x x
f (x, y + h) − f (x, y) x+(y+h)2
− x+y 2 x(x + y 2 ) − x(x + (y + h)2 )
fy (x, y) = lim = lim = lim
h→0 h h→0 h h→0 h[x + (y + h)2 ](x + y 2 )
h(−2xy − xh) −2xy
= lim =
h→0 h[x + (y + h)2 ](x + y 2 ) (x + y 2 )2
47.
∂ 2 ∂ ∂z ∂z ∂z −2x −x
(x + 2y 2 + 3z 2 ) = (1) ⇒ 2x + 0 + 6z = 0 ⇒ 6z = −2x ⇒ = = ,
∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x 6z 3z
∂ 2 ∂ ∂z ∂z ∂z −4y 2y
(x + 2y 2 + 3z 2 ) = (1) ⇒ 0 + 4y + 6z = 0 ⇒ 6z = −4y ⇒ = = .
∂y ∂y ∂y ∂y ∂y 6z 3z
48.
∂ 2 ∂ ∂z ∂z ∂z
(x − y 2 + z 2 − 2z) = (4) ⇒ 2x − 0 + 2z −2 = 0 ⇒ (2z − 2) = −2x
∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x
∂z −2x x
⇒ = = ,
∂x 2z − 2 1−z
∂ 2 ∂ ∂z ∂z ∂z
(x − y 2 + z 2 − 2z) = (4) ⇒ 0 − 2y + 2z −2 = 0 ⇒ (2z − 2) = 2y
∂y ∂y ∂y ∂y ∂y
∂z 2y y
⇒ = = .
∂y 2z − 2 z−1
49.
∂ z ∂z ∂z ∂z ∂z ∂z yz
(xyz) ⇒ e =y x + z · 1 ⇒ ez − xy = yz ⇒ = z .
∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x e − xy
∂ z ∂ z ∂z ∂z ∂z ∂z ∂z xz
(e ) = (xyz) ⇒ e =x y + z · 1 ⇒ ez − xy = xz ⇒ = z .
∂y ∂y ∂y ∂y ∂y ∂y ∂y e − xy
50.
∂ ∂ 2 ∂z ∂z ∂z ∂z ∂z ln y
(yz + x ln y) = (z ) ⇒ y + ln y = 2z ⇒ ln y = 2z −y ⇒ = .
∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x ∂x 2z − y
∂ ∂ 2 ∂z 1 ∂z x ∂z ∂z z + x/y
(yz + x ln y) = (z ) ⇒ y + z · 1 + x · ⇒ 2z ⇒ z + = 2z ⇒ = .
∂y ∂y ∂y y ∂y y ∂y ∂y 2z − y
(
ux = yexy sin y, ux,y = 12x3 y 2
59. u = x4 y 3 − y 4 ⇒ Thus uxy = uyx .
uy = 3x4 y 2 − 4y 3 , uyx = 12x3 y 2
1 −2
ux =
1
, ux,y =
(x + 2y) (x + 2y)2
59. u = ln (x + 2y) ⇒ 2 −2 Thus uxy = uyx .
uy =
, u yx =
1 (x + 2y)2
(x + 2y) 2 k2 t
−α
ux = ke
cos kx,
−α2 k2 t 2 2
75. u = e sin kx ⇒ uxx = −k 2 e−α k t sin kx, Thus α2 uxx = ut .
u = −α2 k 2 e−α2 k2 t sin kx.
t
76.
(a) u = x2 + y 2
ux = 2x, uxx = 2; uy = 2y, uyy = 2.
Thus uxx + uyy ̸= 0 and u = x2 + y 2 does not satisfy Laplace’s Equation.
(b) u = x2 − y 2 is a solution:
uxx = 2, uyy = −2 so uxx + uyy = 0.
Similarly,
x2 − y 2
uyy = .
(x2 + y 2 )2
So uxx + uyy = 0.
(e) u = sin x cosh y + cos x sinh y is a solution:
ux = cos x cosh y − sin x sinh y, uxx = − sin x cosh y − cos x sinh y,
uy = sin x sinh y + cos x cosh y, uyy = sin x cosh y + cos x sinh y.
101.
2
f (x, y)
−2
−2
0 2
0
x 2 −2
y
(a)
(b) For (x, y) ̸= (0, 0)
By symmetry,
x5 − 4x3 y 2 − xy 4
fy (x, y) = .
(x2 + y 2 )2
(c)
(d) By (3)
x6 + 9x4 y 2 − 9x2 y 4 − y 6
fxy (x, y) = .
(x2 + y 2 )3
Now, as (x, y) → (0, 0) along the x-axis, fxy (x, y) → 1 while as (x, y) →
(0, 0) along the y-axis, fxy (x, y) → −1. Thus fxy isn’t continuous at (0, 0)
and Clairaut’s Theorem doesn’t apply, so there is no contradiction. The
graphs of fxy and fyx are identical except at the origin, where we observe the
discontinuity.
1
f (x, y)
−1
2
−2 0
0
2 −2 y
x