The document discusses the principles and strategies of conflict resolution, including definitions of conflict and various approaches such as avoiding, competing, accommodating, collaborating, and compromising. It also outlines negotiation and mediation processes, emphasizing the role of mediators and the importance of ethical conduct. Additionally, it compares arbitration and litigation, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages in resolving disputes.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
36 views6 pages
CRIM 6 Chapter 1
The document discusses the principles and strategies of conflict resolution, including definitions of conflict and various approaches such as avoiding, competing, accommodating, collaborating, and compromising. It also outlines negotiation and mediation processes, emphasizing the role of mediators and the importance of ethical conduct. Additionally, it compares arbitration and litigation, highlighting their advantages and disadvantages in resolving disputes.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6
CHAPTER 1
Principles and Philosophies of Reconciliation,
Arbitration, Negotiation and Meditation What is Conflict? The word conflict comes from the latin word “conflingere” which means to come together for a battle. A serious disagreement and argument about something important. An activity which takes place when conscious beings wish to carry out mutually inconsistent act concerning their wants, needs or obligations. A natural disagreement or struggle between people which may be physical, or between conflicting ideas. What are the Conflict Resolution Strategies? Kenneth Thomas and Ralph Kilmann (2015) developed five conflict resolution strategies: 1. Avoiding 2. Competing 3. Compromising 4. Accommodating 5. Collaborating Conflict Resolution Strategies 1. Avoiding This is unassertive and uncooperative. The person neither pursues his own concerns nor those of the other individual. Thus, he does not deal with the conflict. Avoiding might take the form of diplomatically sidestepping an issue, postponing an issue until a better time or simply withdrawing from a threatening situation. 2. Competing This is assertive and uncooperative. An individual pursues his own concerns at the other persons expense. This is a power- oriented mode in which you use whatever power seems appropriate to win your own position, your ability to argue, your rank, or economic sanctions. 3. Accommodating This is unassertive and cooperative, the complete opposite of competing. When accommodating, the individual neglects his own concerns to satisfy the concerns of the other person, there is an element of self sacrifice in this mode. Accommodating might take the form of selfless generosity or charity, obeying another persons order when you would prefer not to, or yielding to another point of view. 4. Collaborating It is both assertive and cooperative the complete opposite of avoiding. Collaborating involves an attempt to work with others to find some solution that fully satisfies their concerns. It means digging into an issue to pinpoint the underlying needs and wants of two individuals. Collaborating between two persons might take form of exploring a disagreement to learn from each others insight or trying to find a creative solution to an interpersonal problem. 5. Compromising It is moderate in both assertiveness and cooperativeness. The objective is to find some expedient, mutually acceptable solution that partially satisfy both parties. It falls intermediate between competing and accommodating. Compromising gives up more that competing but less that accommodating. Likewise it addresses an issue more directly than avoiding, but does not explore it in as much depth as collaborating. Negotiation A process where to parties in a conflict or disagreement try to reach a resolution together. Process Prior - consult a lawyer. During - parties or their representatives (lawyers) discuss the issues to come to a resolution. Principles of Negotiation Reason - to produce something better than results that can be obtained without negotiation. Goal - an agreement that is acceptable to all parties, to which they remain committed, and which they needed to implement. Mediation Process where a neutral person assists the parties in discussing the matter and reaching a solution. Mediator A person who conducts mediation. Help the parties communicate. Ensures that communication between the parties is fair and honest. He is not judge or an arbitrator and cannot take the side of either party, gives legal advice, and/or provides counselling. Can assist by clarifying issues, identifying concerns, and helping parties understand each others interest. Can assist the parties in reaching an agreement between them but will not force the parties into solution during mediation. How is Mediation Done? In private and the decisions made are private. Can take place in person where parties meet face to face for discussions. Or the parties may be place at separate locations where the mediator communicates information between parties. After mediation, the parties can sign a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) A cooperative agreement written between the parties to obey the agreed terms and conditions. Mediators writes the MOA which outlines details of the solutions reached by the parties. Purpose: to have a written understanding of the agreement between the parties. Each party should have their lawyer to review the MOA. Ethical Conduct of a Mediator 1. Competence 2. Impartiality 3. Confidentiality 4. Consent and Self-determination 5. Separation of Mediation from Counseling and Legal Advice 6. Promotion of Respect and Control of Abuse Process 7. Solicitation or Acceptance of any Gift Characteristics of Mediation 1) Promotes communication and cooperation. 2) Provides a basis for you to resolve disputes on your own. 3) Voluntary, informal and flexible. 4) Private and confidential, avoiding public disclosure of personal or business problems. 5) Reduces hostility and preserve ongoing relationships. 6) Allows mutually acceptable agreements tailored to meet the parties need. 7) Win-win solution. Disadvantages of Mediation 1. Possibility that a settlement between the parties may not arise. 2. Lacks the support of any judicial authority. 3. Absence of formality-not based on any legal principle. 4. Truth of an issue may not be revealed. Arbitration A process where a neutral third party makes a decision. The decision makers in arbitration are called arbitrators. There can be one arbitrator or multiple. Common in commercial disputes, consumer and employment matters, family disputes, or insurance claim. Advantages of Arbitration over Court hearings and Litigation 1. Faster 2. More flexible 3. Less argumentative 4. Less intimidating 5. Less expensive PROCESS Submission - referring a dispute to an arbitrator. Hearing - evidence and arguments are presented. Judgement - decision Arbitral Decisions (Awards) Any partial or final decision by an arbitrator in resolving the issue or controversy. Generally final and compulsory. May be filled in court and enforced as if it were a court judgement. Often take a long time to receive an arbitration award. General Principles of Arbitration 1. The object is to obtain a fair resolution of disputes by an impartial third party without unnecessary expense or delay. 2. Parties should be free to agree how their disputes are resolved, subject only to such safeguards as are necessary in the public interest. 3. Courts should not interfere. Litigation An action brought in court to enforce a particular right. Example: Breach of contract. Act or process of bringing a lawsuit in and of itself; a judicial contest; A contest authorized by law, in a court of justice for the purpose of enforcing a right. Basic Concept of Litigation To prevent injustice, court will restrain a party from further litigation, by a writ of injunction; A judicial writ, process or proceeding whereby a party is ordered to do or refrain from doing a certain act. Characteristics of Litigation 1. It is involuntary. The parties are mandated by law to appear in court 2. It is formal and structured 3. The parties are given equal rights to present their arguments 4. The process is public 5. The decision are restricted 6. The parties have the right to appeal 7. The losing party may pay the costs Advantages of Litigation 1) The proceedings and discussions become part of public records and the final judgement is clear 2) It is a two way process, both parties are expected to perform their duties in litigation. 3) Discussion made in litigation become part of jurisprudence as bases of deciding future similar cases 4) Appeals can be either a pro or con. A reviewer of the case may show clearer impartiality 5) Stricter evidence, the discussion are based on evidence not on speculations, hearsay or conjectures. 6) It is a cost effective option as summary rules apply Disadvantages - It is adversarial(involving two parties) 1. There is less regard to fair solution 2. The discussion made might not be acceptable to either party 3. This is disturbance of commercial relation ship 4. Decisions made results in a win lose scenario and not a mutually acceptable decision 5. It is time consuming What happens when a lawsuit goes to mediation? A mediator works with each party in a lawsuit to reach a compromise before going to trial. However, no party can be forced to settle. Stages I. Conveying the mediation II. Preparation III. Opening session IV. Communication V. The negotiation VI. Closure