Physics IBDP Data Analysis P3 For 2024 Batch and P1b For 2025 batch-MS
Physics IBDP Data Analysis P3 For 2024 Batch and P1b For 2025 batch-MS
Data Analysis
Questions
from pastpapers
2016-2023
1HL_P3_23N_TZ1_TZ2_HL_Ms –4– 8823 – 6509M
Section A
1. b there are heat losses OR Do not accept any reference to thermal equilibrium, unless clearly
block radiates/loses thermal energy ✔ explained as the balance between energy coming in and out of the
block. 2
at a rate that equals the power of the heater ✔
1. c evidence of tangent line at t = 0 Ignore the sign.
OR
use of the curve in its initial part of up to 0.75 min ✔ For MP2, allow the use of any two points on the curve other than
the ones indicated above, for [1] max.
correct slope calculation ✔
2
–5– 8823 – 6509M
1. e i percentage uncertainty in c is 8 % ✔ Allow ECF from d) for MP1, if candidates did not use the rate of
= 73 « J kg−1 K −1 » ✔
∆c 917.6 × 0.08
= cooling, accepting either 8% or 4%.
2
Allow ECF from (d) for MP2.
Allow ECF from MP1.
1. e ii c = (9.2 ± 0.7) × 102 J kg−1 K −1 ✔ Accept 1 or 2 significant figures for c with a 1 s.f. uncertainty OR 3
s.f. for c with a 2 s.f. uncertainty, i.e., consistent expressions.
Allow ECF from d) and e) i).
Accept an alternative unit, e.g. in g or in ºC.
1
–6– 8823 – 6509M
Section A
3
–6– M23/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ2/XX/M
1. c ii point plotted at (40 kPa, 49x105 N3) Allow for the point to be plotted from 46 to 56 x105 N3 at 40 kPa, as candidates
may calculate or may plot from a graphical analysis.
1
1. d i 15 % seen anywhere MP1 is for the propagation of 5%. It can be shown differently, e.g. 3x5% Allow
«Δ(F3) =» 39.4 x 105 x 0.15= 5.9 x105 students to use 40 ×105 (from the graph).
±6 × 105 Award MP3 for any uncertainty rounded to 1 significant digit
Award [3] for a BCA.
3
Allow ECF from MP1 and MP2
1. d ii error bar drawn at 30 kPa from 34x105 to Allow ± half square on each side of the bar or one square overall (± 2x105)
46x105 N3
Allow ECF from d(i).
1
2. b smaller mass of cube OR hotter cube OR more mass of water OR colder Accept reference to repeating the experiment and
water OR more precise thermometer taking mean values.
Accept any reasonable answer that increases 1
change in temperature of the cube.
Do not accept more accurate thermometer
3HL_P3_20N_TZ2_HL_Ms
Section A
Q5
Question Answers Notes Total
1. a 1 MP1: Accept ‘linear’
«theory suggests» Pi-Po is proportional to ✓
R MP2 do not award if there is any contradiction 2
eg: graph not proportional, does not pass
through origin.
graph/line of best fit is straight/linear «so yes»
OR
graph/line of best fit passes through the origin «so yes» ✓
2
use of equation with coordinates of a point✓
= 0.025 ✓
1 b ii kg s–2 ✓ kg
Accept 1
s2
–4– N20/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ0/XX/M
1
–5– N20/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ0/XX/M
OR 1
OR
2
«so» experimental mr is smaller «than calculated value» ✓
0.05
« = » 0.04 ✔
1.15
2
(continued…)
–5– N19/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ0/XX/M
(Question 1 continued)
2
Q9 OR 1
2
–5– M19/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ2/XX/M
2. b ii f 2 AND T
OR
f AND T
OR
1
log f AND log T
OR
ln f AND ln T ✔
2
–6– M19/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ2/XX/M
OR
repeat measurements ✓
ALTERNATIVE 2:
increase D «hence s»
OR
Decrease d ✓
Section A
Question Answers Notes Total
1. a Accept other power of tens multiples
m ✔
3
2
3 1
Q12
3
of m 2 , eg: cm 2 .
1. b measured uncertainties «for one oscillation and for 20 oscillations» are the
same/similar/OWTTE
OR 2
% uncertainty is less for 20 oscillations than for one ✔
dividing «by 20» / finding mean reduces the random error ✔
(continued…)
–4– N18/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ0/XX/M
(Question 1 continued)
2.5
2.0
T/s 1.5
1
1.0
0.5
0.0
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
1. c ii 1 c
theory predicts proportional relation « T ∝ , slope
= Td
= = constant » ✔
d g
2
the graph is «straight» line through the origin ✔
(continued…)
–5– N18/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ0/XX/M
(Question 1 continued)
Calculation of g ✔
Q14 2
absolute uncertainty 2 0.1 « mm » 2 10 3
« m » or 2.1 10 « m » or
3
2.0 10 «m» ✓
3
1. b 2s 2 0.642
«a » 9.744 « ms 2 » ✓
t2 0.3632
total absolute uncertainty 0.1 or 0.14 AND same number of decimal places in value Final uncertainty must be the
and uncertainty, ie: 9.7 0.1 or 9.74 0.14 ✓ absolute uncertainty
–4– M18/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ2/XX/M
2. b i extrapolating line to cross x-axis / use of x-intercept Award [1 max] for negative answers
OR
y -intercept
Use C
gradient
2
OR
use of gradient and one point, correctly substituted in one of the formulae ✓
accept answers between 3.0 and 4.5 «cm» ✓
(continued…)
–5– M18/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ2/XX/M
(Question 2 continued)
4
Using P 2
to get value between 6.9 10 4 and 9.5 10 4 «W »
K
and POT correct ✓
Correct unit, W and answer to 1, 2 or 3 significant figures ✓
4
ALTERNATIVE 2
1
Finds I from use of one point (x and y) on the line with
y2
P
x 6cm and C from (b)(i) to use in I or
4 (C x )2
1
K x KC ✓
I
Correct re-arrangement to get P between 6.9 10 4 and
9.5 10 4 «W» and POT correct ✓
Correct unit, W and answer to 1, 2 or 3 significant figures ✓
(continued…)
–6– M18/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ2/XX/M
(Question 2 continued)
Section A
1. b i tangent drawn at 80 °C
gradient values separated by minimum of 20 °C Do not accept tangent unless “ruler” straight.
Tangent line must be touching the curve drawn for MP1 to be
awarded. 3
1. c i « 0.1× 4.198 × 10 =
» 4.198 « kJ » or 4198 « J » Accept values between 4.19 and 4.21 1
1. c ii percentage uncertainty in ∆T = 10% Allow fractional uncertainties in MP1 and MP2
Watch for ECF from (c)(i)
« 2% + 5% + 10% =
» 17%
Watch for ECF from MP1
absolute uncertainty = « 0.17 × 4.198 = » 0.7 « kJ » therefore Watch for ECF from MP2 3
2 sig figs Do not accept an answer without justification
OR
absolute uncertainty to more than 1 sig fig and consistent
final answer
–4– N17/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ0/XX/M
1
« hence m = »
ε
2. b «−» r Allow answer in words 1
Q18 to reduce absolute uncertainty Do not accept just “to find an average” or just “reduce error”
Ignore any mention to accuracy
1 max
to improve precision
3. b as the literature value is within the range « 9.7 − 11.1» OWTTE
2
hence it is accurate MP2 must be correctly justified
9HL_P3_17M_TZ2_HL_Ms –3– M17/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ2/XX/M
Section A
b i d 0.35 0.01 AND d 0.05 0.01 « cm » Allow final answers in the range of 0.11 to 0.18.
(continued…)
–4– M17/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ2/XX/M
(Question 1 continued)
Q20
1
(continued…)
–6– M17/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ2/XX/M
(Question 2 continued)
Section A
Q22
Accept calculations based on
∆L ∆T 0.01 0.005
∆= + 2× = ) «9.7907 × + 2× = » 0.0997
2.540
g g(
L T 1.60 gmax = 9.8908
3
OR gmin = 9.6913 .
gmax − gmin
1.0 % = 0.099 ≈ 0.1
2
Section A
b i total length of bar = 0.2 cm Accept correct error bar in one of the points: OX = 1.8 cm
OR OY = 5.8 cm (which is not a measured point but is a
point on the interpolated line) OR OX = 5.8 cm.
1
Ignore error bar of OX.
Allow range from 0.2 to 0.3 cm, by eye.
b ii suitable line drawn extending at least up to 6 cm If using one value of OX and OY from the graph for any
of the first three data points award [2 max].
OR
Award [3] for correct value for each of the
gradient calculated using two out of the first three data points
three data points and average. 3
OWTTE 1
OR
OX
«the equation n = » uses OI instead of the hypotenuse of the ∆ IOX or IOY
OY
2. a kg m −1 s −2 K –1 1
Q24 b i any straight line that either goes or would go, if extended, through the origin 1
Section A
Q26
1
–6– M16/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ0/XX/M
giving t from 25 to 40
2
ALTERNATIVE 2
the data do not support the hypothesis
any relevant support for the suggestion, eg straight line cannot be fitted through the error
bars and the origin
–7– M16/4/PHYSI/HP3/ENG/TZ0/XX/M
c numerator and denominator will be 10 times larger so refractive index is unchanged “Constant material” is not
enough for MP1. 2
relative/absolute uncertainty will be smaller