Scribd
Upload
6 views2 pages

Display PDF

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Lance Lotte Sagar, who has been in jail since October 19, 2024, for allegedly defrauding a complainant by promising a government job and issuing a forged appointment letter. The court noted that co-accused with similar allegations had previously been granted bail and found insufficient evidence against the applicant. The applicant must provide a personal bond and appear before the trial court until the case is resolved.

Uploaded by

AMIT PRADHAN
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
6 views2 pages

Display PDF

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted bail to Lance Lotte Sagar, who has been in jail since October 19, 2024, for allegedly defrauding a complainant by promising a government job and issuing a forged appointment letter. The court noted that co-accused with similar allegations had previously been granted bail and found insufficient evidence against the applicant. The applicant must provide a personal bond and appear before the trial court until the case is resolved.

Uploaded by

AMIT PRADHAN
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

1/2

2024:CGHC:44932
NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

MCRC No. 7969 of 2024

1 - Lance Lotte Sagar S/o Shri Layal Sagar, Aged About 30 Years R/o P-3, C-512, Nava
Raipur Sector 27, Nawagaon - 1, Po Rakhi Ps Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
(Wrongly Mention Father Name Lomas In Impugned Order And Also Wrongly Mention
Spelling Of The Applicant).
... applicant

versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Ps Kasdol, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara,


Chhattisgarh.
... Respondents

For Applicant : Mr. Dheerendra Pandey, Advocate


For Respondent : Mr. Ajit Singh, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput


Order On Board
19.11.2024
1. Heard.

2. Admit.

3. Since case diary is available, with the consent of the parties the matter is heard
finally.

4. The applicant has preferred the first bail application under Section 483 of BNSS for

grant of regular bail, as he is in jail since 19.10.2024 in connection with Crime No.

796/2022 registered at Police Station- Kasdol District- Balodabazar-Bhatapara,

(C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 468/34 of the Indian Penal

Code, 1860.
2/2

5. The case of prosecution in brief is that the applicant and other co-accused has taken

amount from the complainant for providing the Government job and issuing forged

appointment letter.

6. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is an innocent person

and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the co-accused

persons having similar allegations have been granted bail by this Court in MCRC

No. 9228/2022 and MCRC No. 9687/2022 vide order dated 10.01.2023. He submits

that the applicant has been arrested on 19.10.2014 and there is no admissible

evidence against him.

7. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

8. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

9. Be that as it may, considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, the

facts and circumstances of the case, material collected by the prosecution and the co-

accused have been enlarged on bail and trial is likely to take sometime, therefore, the

bail application filed by applicant is allowed. It is directed that applicant shall be

released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one

solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court. He

shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given by the said trial

Court, till disposal of the trial.

10. It is made clear that the observations made hereinabove is only for the purpose of

deciding the bail application and the trial Court will decide the case on its own merit

without being influenced by any observation made hereinabove. It is also made clear

that the complainant or State is at liberty to move an application regarding

cancellation of bail of the applicant in the event of applicant involving himself in

similar offence in future.

11. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/-

(Sachin Singh Rajput )


Judge
H.ANSARI

You might also like