0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views4 pages

Ordinary Differential Equation: Some Basic Definitions

The document provides definitions and theorems related to ordinary differential equations, focusing on concepts such as analytic functions, linear dependence, linear independence, and the Wronskian. It establishes conditions for linear dependence of functions and discusses the implications of the Wronskian being non-zero. Additionally, it introduces the concept of a fundamental set of solutions for nth order ODEs, emphasizing that any solution can be expressed as a linear combination of these fundamental solutions.

Uploaded by

rousanuzz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views4 pages

Ordinary Differential Equation: Some Basic Definitions

The document provides definitions and theorems related to ordinary differential equations, focusing on concepts such as analytic functions, linear dependence, linear independence, and the Wronskian. It establishes conditions for linear dependence of functions and discusses the implications of the Wronskian being non-zero. Additionally, it introduces the concept of a fundamental set of solutions for nth order ODEs, emphasizing that any solution can be expressed as a linear combination of these fundamental solutions.

Uploaded by

rousanuzz
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATION

SOME BASIC DEFINITIONS

Definition: A function is said to be analytic in a neighbourhood I = {x : |x − x0 | < r0 }


of a point x0 , if derivatives of all order exist, for the function f (x), in I i.e., if f (x) also
possesses a convergent infinite Taylor series expansion or power series expansion in I.

The function f (x) has a power series expansion implies f (x) = ∞ i


P
i=0 ai (x − x0 ) , where ai s

are constants. The series on the right hand side converges to f (x) in I.
f ′ (x0 ) f n (x0 )
It may be noted that a0 = f (x0 ), a1 = 1!
, ..... an = n!
.
So we have
′ (x
0)
n (x
0)
f (x) = f (x0 ) + (x − x0 ) f 1!
+ .... + (x − x0 )n f n!
+ .....

i.e., f (x) has infinite Taylor’s series expansion in I. In other words, f (x) possesses deriva-
tives of all order in I.

Linear Dependence, Linear Independence and Wronskian:

Definition: The functions fi (x), i = 1, 2, ...n are saidPto be linearly dependent if con-
stants c1 , c2 , ...cn , not all zero, can be found such that ni=0 ci fi (x) = 0.
Otherwise,
Pn the functions fi (x), i = 1, 2, ...n are said to be linearly independent if
c f
i=0 i i (x) = 0 implies ci = 0 ∀i = 1, 2, ...n.

Definition: Let the functions fi (x), i = 1, 2, ...n be n real functions, each of which has
(n − 1) derivatives in I then the determinant

f1 f2 ... fn
f1 ′ f2 ′ ... fn ′
. . . .
∆(f1 , f2 , ....fn ) ≡ W (f1 , f2 , ....fn ) = . . . .
. . . .
. . . .
f1 (n−1) f2 (n−1) ... fn (n−1)

is called wronskian of fi (x), i = 1, 2, ...n.

Theorem: A necessary and sufficient condition for linear dependence of two analytic
functions f1 (x), f2 (x) for x ∈ I is ∆(f1 , f2 ) = 0 in I.

Condition necessary:

If f1 (x), f2 (x) are linearly dependent then we can find constants c1 , c2 not simultaneously
zero such that
c1 f1 (x) + c2 f2 (x) = 0

1
which on differentiation yields

c1 f1 ′ (x) + c2 f2 ′ (x) = 0

Since c1 , c2 do not vanish simultaneously, so ∆(f1 , f2 ) = 0 in I.

Condition sufficient:

f1 f2
Let ∆(f1 , f2 ) = 0 in I. This implies = 0 =⇒ f1 f2 ′ − f2 f1 ′ = 0.
f1 ′ f2 ′
Now two cases may arise.
Case I: f1 ≡ 0. Then we have c1 f1 ′ (x) + 0.f2 ′ (x) = 0 in I. This implies f1 (x), f2 (x) are
linearly dependent.

Suppose f1 is not identically zero in I and let E denotes the set of zeros of f1 in I.
′ ′
Thus in I − E, f1 6= 0. Therefore in I − E, f1 f2f−f1
2
2 f1
= 0 =⇒ dxd
(f2 /f1 ) = 0 =⇒
f2 = Af1 , A being a constant.
Since f1 (x), f2 (x) are differentiable everywhere in I, so, f2 = Af1 in I. This shows that
f1 (x), f2 (x) are linearly dependent.
This theorem can be extended to the case of n functions fi (x), i = 1, 2, ...n.

Theorem: A necessary and sufficient condition for linear dependence of n analytic func-
tions f1 (x), f2 (x).....fn (x) for x ∈ I is ∆(f1 , f2 ...fn ) = 0 in I.

Note that the above theorems are true for analytic function. However in general we have
the following theorem.

Theorem: If wronskian of 2 functions f1 (x), f2 (x) defined on I is nonzero at atleast one


point of I, then the set of 2 functions are linearly independent in I.

Proof: Let f1 (x), f2 (x) be linearly dependent in I. Then there exists constants c1 , c2 not
all zero such that

c1 f1 (x) + c2 f2 (x) = 0 (1)


which on differentiation yields

c1 f1 ′ (x) + c2 f2 ′ (x) = 0. (2)

As per given condition, there exists a point x0 ∈ I such that

∆(f1 , f2 )(x0 ) 6= 0 (3)

f1 (x0 ) f2 (x0 )
in I. This implies 6= 0 =⇒ f1 (x0 )f2 ′ (x0 ) − f2 (x0 )f1 ′ (x0 ) 6= 0.
f1 ′ (x0 ) f2 ′ (x0 )
Thus from (1) and (2), we have

c1 f1 (x0 ) + c2 f2 (x0 ) = 0

2
c1 f1 ′ (x0 ) + c2 f2 ′ (x0 ) = 0.
f1 (x0 ) f2 (x0 )
Since c1 , c2 are not zero simultaneously, so =0
f1 ′ (x0 ) f2 ′ (x0 )
which is a contradiction by (3). Thus our assumption that f1 (x), f2 (x) are linearly depen-
dent in I is wrong. Hence the theorem.

Theorem: If wronskian of n functions f1 (x), f2 (x), ....fn (x) defined on I is nonzero at


atleast one point of I, then the set of n functions are linearly independent in I.

However, the converse is not true. the Two or more functions can be linearly independent
yet their wronskian may be zero.

Example: f1 (x) = x2 , f2 (x) = x|x|, − ∞ < x < ∞.

f2 (x) = x2 , for x > 0,


= 0, for x = 0
= x2 for x < 0.

f2 ′ (x) = 2x, for x > 0,


= 0, for x = 0
= −2x for x < 0.

fi (x), fi ′ (x), i = 1, 2 are continuous P


in (−∞, ∞). Also, fi (x), i = 1, 2 are linearly indepen-
dent. For this we have to show that ni=0 ci fi (x) = 0 =⇒ c1 = c2 = 0.

For x > 0, c1 f1 + c2 f2 = 0 =⇒ c1 x2 + c2 x2 = 0 =⇒ x2 (c1 + c2 ) = 0 =⇒ c1 = −c2 =


0, since x > 0. Thus, ∀x c1 x2 + c2 x|x| = 0 =⇒ c1 = 0, c2 = 0.

x2 x|x|
Now, ∆(f1 , f2 ) = = 0, ∀x.
2x 2|x|
This shows that ∆(f1 , f2 ) is identically equal to zero in (−∞, ∞) but f1 and f2 are linearly
independent.

It may be noted here that although f1 (x) is analytic in (−∞, ∞) but f2 (x) is not analytic
at x = 0. For

f2 ′′ (x) = 2, for x > 0,


= 0, for x = 0
= −2 for x < 0.

Now we come to the context of ordinary differential equations.

Theorem: Let y1 , y2 be two analytic solutions of ODE L1 (y) = 0 in I. Let x0 be any point
in I. Then

3
Rx
− a1 (t)dt
∆(x) = ∆(x0 ) e x0

Proof:
The analytic functions y1 , y2 satisfy the ODE L1 (yi ) = 0 in I.
The wronskian of y1 , y2 in I is given by

y1 y2
∆(y1 , y2 ) = = y1 y2 ′ − y2 y1 ′ .
y1 ′ y2 ′
Now,
y1 y2 y1 y2
∆′ (y1 , y2) = = y1 y2 ′′ − y2 y1 ′′ =
y1 y2
′′ ′′
−a1 y1 − a2 y1 −a1 y2 ′ − a2 y1

y1 y2 y y
= −a(x) − a2 (x) 1 2 = −a1 (x)∆(x).
y1 ′ y2 ′ y1 y2
Thus
∆′ (t) = −a1 (t)∆(t).R
This is a first order ODE for ∆(t). Solving we have
− xx a1 (t)dt
∆(x) = ∆(x0 ) e 0 .

Remark 3: Suppose ∆(x0 ) 6= 0 where x0 is any arbitrary point in I. Then (y1 , y2) are
linearly independent. Moreover since x0 is any arbitrary point in I so if ∆(x0 ) 6= 0 then
∆(x) never equal to 0 in I. Thus we can say that the analytic functions y1 , y2 which are
solutions of L1 (y) = 0 are linearly independent iff ∆(x) 6= 0, ∀ x ∈ I.

Definition: The set of linear independent solutions {y1 , y2 , ....yn } of nth order ODE
L(y) = 0 is known as Fundamental set.
Any solution y(x) of L(y) =P0 can be written as linear combination of the elements of
fundamental set, i.e., y(x) = ni=0 ci yi (x).

You might also like