1.2 ETOPO 2022 User Guide
1.2 ETOPO 2022 User Guide
User Guide
Page 1 of 9
1. Intent of this Document and POC
1.1 This document is intended to provide a basic understanding of the product (or dataset)
including points of contact, sources used to develop the product, quality control practices, and
steps taken to validate the accuracy of the product. References are provided at the end of this
document for users interested in further technical details.
ETOPO is released globally as a full-global-coverage earth surface elevation file comprised of 288
individual 15x15 degree tiles (latitude/longitude) at 15-arc-second geographic resolution. The tiles
are provided in GeoTiff and Network Common Data Form (NetCDF) formats, with identical
information provided in each format. An additional 62 tiles have “bed” versions that provide
bedrock elevations under the surface of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Each 15s tile has
a Source ID (SID) integer file identifying from which data source each ETOPO grid cell was
acquired. All tiles are in horizontal WGS84 geographic coordinates (EPSG 1:4326) and referenced
in meters relative to the Earth Gravitational Model of 2008 (EGM2008) geoid surface
(EPSG:3855). Each tile comes with an accompanying integer Source ID (“sid”) tile specifying
from which source dataset each ETOPO elevation was derived (see Section 5). Data Sources and
Processing), as well as an accompanying “geoid” tile for converting EGM2008 geoid heights into
WGS84 ellipsoid elevation heights (EPSG:4979). Since most other geoid, ellipsoid, and/or tidal
vertical datums are defined by grids in reference to the WGS84 ellipsoid, this eases the conversion
of ETOPO 2022 tiles into other vertical reference datums of the user’s choice. For most purposes,
EGM2008 is an adequate approximation of mean sea level.
1
EPSG = European Petroleum Survey Group, commonly-used codes for horizontal and vertical coordinate reference
systems. References available at https://epsg.io/.
Page 2 of 9
2.2 Elevation Conversion
To convert a given tile from EGM2008 to WGS84-referenced elevations, add the values of the
elevation tile to the geoid-height tile:
Single global tiles are provided at 30- and 60-arc-second (i.e., 1-arc-minute) resolutions in both
GeoTiff and NetCDF format, in surface and ice-sheet-bed versions. 30- and 60-second grids were
downsampled from the 15-arc-second elevation tiles for more general uses, and do not have
accompanying SID tiles.
ETOPO_2022_v[#]_[RR]s_[N][YY][W][XXX][_suffix][.tif]
ETOPO_2022_v1_15s_N60W045_bed.tif
is a 15-arc-second resolution GeoTiff file with a North-West (upper-left) corner at North 60-
degrees latitude and West 45-degrees longitude, in this case containing bedrock elevations under
the surface of the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets (with ground surface elevations elsewhere
in the tile).
Page 3 of 9
All ETOPO tiles have a nodata value of -99,999, although this value is not in any ETOPO grids.
Temporal resolution and extent Data collected from various sources (see Data
Sources and Processing)
Page 4 of 9
Source Vertical Layer source Creator Link 2 Primary Use
Name datum id
2
Website links are active at the time of creation of this document.
3
GEBCO = General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans
4
Mean sea level
5
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
6
National Centers for Environmental Information
7
Global Multi-Resolution Topography
8
North American Vertical Datum of 1988
9
Office of the Coast Survey
10
Amazon Web Services
11
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management
Page 5 of 9
Source Vertical Layer source Creator Link 2 Primary Use
Name datum id
Other datasets were not directly included in ETOPO, but were instrumental for the development,
production, and/or validation of the source data layers.
12
Forest and Buildings Removed Copernicus DEM
13
EIGEN-6G4 GOCE-derived gravity model
14
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
15
National Snow & Ice Data Center
16
Continuously-Updated Digital Elevation Models
17
Current released data tiles through August 2022
Page 6 of 9
Source Name Vertical datum Creator Link Primary Use
6. Quality Control
All source datasets are visually inspected for artifacts and obvious errors before being included in
the ETOPO product. Ocean bathymetry data products are assessed based upon source resolution,
quality, and age, and are ranked subjectively according to those metrics. (Since data sources such
as GEBCO use a compilation of available ocean-depth soundings, it is often difficult to
independently and quantitatively assess the accuracy of various bathymetric data sources).
Land surface datasets were ranked according to accuracy assessments as validated by NASA’s
ICESat-2 satellite, specifically ICESat-2 data collected during the calendar-year 2021 (1 January
through 31 December). Datasets were assessed individually in their own native horizontal
projections, and again in the final ETOPO product after horizontal regridding and vertical datum
transformations. Details of ICESat-2 processing are outlined in the next section.
7. Validation
Land areas between 89S and 89N latitudes are evaluated for vertical accuracy using a database of
800-billion ICESat-2 ATL03 photons collected during the calendar year 2021. The ATL03
photon product is combined with adjoining ATL08 land-and-vegetation elevation granules to
classify photons that are reflected off land or vegetation canopy. A land mask is produced using
the Copernicus DEM dataset to filter out only solid-land areas, and the HydroLakes dataset is
used to filter out photons reflecting off inland lakes and reservoirs (whose surface heights
fluctuate frequently and are not reliable targets for validating land elevations). Since ETOPO
2022 is a bare-earth elevation dataset, photos that reflected off vegetation canopy (as classified in
the ATL08 dataset) or building-tops (using the OpenStreetMap public web database) are filtered
out. Remaining ground-reflecting photons are collected into each ETOPO grid cell where they
fall. A mean of the interdecile range (10-90th percentile) of these photon elevations is used to
18
Ice, Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2
19
World Geodetic Survey of 1984
Page 7 of 9
produce an ICESat-2 derived ground elevation, which is subtracted from the ETOPO grid cell
elevation to produce an error. Errors are compiled and assessed for each input layer (see Figure
below for CUDEM topography assessments) and displayed (see Figure 1 below) as (A) a
histogram, (B) 1:1 scatterplot with ICESat-2 elevations, (C) histogram of photon density per grid
cell in the interdecile range, and (D) a histogram of average canopy cover over each grid cell.
The final vertical accuracy assessments for ETOPO 2022 are still being compiled with respect to
ICESat-2 and will be made available in a revised version of this document.
8. References
Amante, C. and Eakins, B. A. (2009). ETOPO1 1 Arc-minute Global Relief Model: Procedures,
Data Sources and Analysis,
https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/relief/ETOPO1/docs/ETOPO1.pdf
Mayer, L., Jakobsson, M., Allen, G., Dorschel, B., Falconer, R., Ferrini, V., Lamarche, G., Snaith,
H., & Weatherall, P. (2018). The Nippon Foundation—GEBCO Seabed 2030 Project: The
Quest to See the World’s Oceans Completely Mapped by 2030. Geosciences, 8(2), 63.
https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8020063
Page 8 of 9
Ryan, W. B. F., Carbotte, S. M., Coplan, J. O., O’Hara, S., Melkonian, A., Arko, R., Weissel, R.
A., Ferrini, V., Goodwillie, A., Nitsche, F., Bonczkowski, J., & Zemsky, R. (2009). Global Multi-
Resolution Topography synthesis. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 10(3).
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GC002332
Kramer, K., & Shedd, W. W. (2017). A 1.4-Billion Pixel Map of the Seafloor: BOEM’s
Mission to Visualize Dynamic Geology and Identify Natural Seep Sites in the Gulf of
Mexico. 2017, OS31C-1411.
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AGUFMOS31C1411K/abstract
The European Space Agency. Copernicus DEM - Global and European Digital Elevation
Model (COP-DEM). https://spacedata.copernicus.eu/web/cscda/dataset-
details?articleId=394198
Hawker, L., Uhe, P., Paulo, L., Sosa, J., Savage, J., Sampson, C., & Neal, J. (2022). A 30 m global
map of elevation with forests and buildings removed. Environmental Research Letters, 17(2),
024016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac4d4f
Morlighem, M., Williams, C. N., Rignot, E., An, L., Arndt, J. E., Bamber, J. L., Catania, G.,
Chauché, N., Dowdeswell, J. A., Dorschel, B., Fenty, I., Hogan, K., Howat, I., Hubbard, A.,
Jakobsson, M., Jordan, T. M., Kjeldsen, K. K., Millan, R., Mayer, L., … Zinglersen, K. B. (2017).
BedMachine v3: Complete Bed Topography and Ocean Bathymetry Mapping of Greenland
From Multibeam Echo Sounding Combined With Mass Conservation. Geophysical Research
Letters, 44(21), 11,051-11,061. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074954
OpenStreetMap: https://www.openstreetmap.org/
Page 9 of 9