Introduction To Simulink With Engineering Applications 2nd - Edition.Mar. Edition Steven T. Karris
Introduction To Simulink With Engineering Applications 2nd - Edition.Mar. Edition Steven T. Karris
com
https://ebookgate.com/product/introduction-to-simulink-with-
engineering-applications-2nd-edition-mar-edition-steven-t-
karris/
OR CLICK HERE
DOWLOAD NOW
https://ebookgate.com/product/circuit-analysis-i-with-matlab-
computing-and-simulink-simpowersystems-modeling-1st-edition-steven-
karris/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/engineering-optimization-an-
introduction-with-metaheuristic-applications-1st-edition-xin-she-yang/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/linear-algebra-with-applications-global-
edition-steven-j-leon/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/introduction-to-lattice-theory-with-
computer-science-applications-1st-edition-garg/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/solutions-manual-to-matlab-an-
introduction-with-applications-5th-edition-amos-gilat/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/introduction-to-plasma-physics-with-
space-and-laboratory-applications-donald-a-gurnett/
ebookgate.com
Introduction to Simulink
with Engineering Applications
Second Edition
Steven T. Karris
Orchard Publications
www.orchardpublications.com
Introduction to Simulink®
with Engineering Applications
Second Edition
Steven T. Karris
Orchard Publications
www.orchardpublications.com
Introduction to Simulink ® with Engineering Applications, Second Edition
Copyright ©2008 Orchard Publications. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this
publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means, or stored in a data base or retrieval system,
without the prior written permission of the publisher.
Product and corporate names are trademarks or registered trademarks of The MathWorks™, Inc. They are used only
for identification and explanation, without intent to infringe.
ISBN-10: 1-934404-10-1
ISBN-13: 978-1-934404-10-2
TXu 1−303-668
Disclaimer
The author has made every effort to make this text as complete and accurate as possible, but no warranty is implied.
The author and publisher shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss
or damages arising from the information contained in this text.
Preface
This text is an introduction to Simulink ®, a companion application to MATLAB ®. It is written
for students at the undergraduate and graduate programs, as well as for the working professional.
The author claims no originality of the content, and the description of the Simulink blocks is
extracted from The MathWorks™ documentation without intent to infringe. The intent is to
provide a complete reference text, and whenever necessary, the author refers the reader to The
MathWorks™ documentation. Whenever there is a conflict between this text and The
MathWorks™ documentation, the latter takes precedence.
Although some previous knowledge of MATLAB would be helpful, it is not absolutely necessary;
Appendix A of this text is an introduction to MATLAB to enable the reader to begin learning
both MATLAB and Simulink simultaneously, and to perform graphical computations and
programming.
Chapters 2 through 19 describe the blocks in all Simulink Version 7.1 libraries. Their application
is illustrated with Simulink models that contain the pertinent blocks, and some are supplemented
with MATLAB functions, commands, and statements. Some background information is provided
for lesser known definitions and topics. Chapters 1 and 20 contain several Simulink models to
illustrate various applied math and engineering applications. Appendix B is an introduction to
masked subsystems, and Appendix C introduces the reader to random generation procedures.
Appendix D is an introduction to Weighted Moving Averages.
This text supplements our Numerical Analysis Using MATLAB and Excel, ISBN 978−1−934404−
03−4. It is self-contained; the blocks of each library are described in an orderly fashion that is
consistent with Simulink’s documentation. This arrangement provides insight into how a model is
used and how its parts interact with each another.
Like MATLAB, Simulink can be used with both linear and nonlinear systems, which can be
modeled in continuous time, sample time, or a hybrid of these. Examples are provided in this text.
Most of the examples presented in this book can be implemented with the Student Versions of
MATLAB and Simulink. A few may require the full versions of these outstanding packages, and
these examples may be skipped. Some add−ons, known as Toolboxes and Blocksets can be
obtained from The MathWorks,™ Inc., 3 Apple Hill Drive, Natick, MA, 01760-2098, USA,
www.mathworks.com.
To get the most out of this outstanding application, it is highly recommended that this text is used
in conjunction with the MATLAB and Simulink User’s Guides. Other references are provided in
the reference section of this text.
This is the second edition of this title, and although every effort was made to correct possible
typographical errors and erroneous references to figures and tables, some may have been
overlooked. Accordingly, the author will appreciate it very much if any such errors are brought to
his attention so that corrections can be made for the next edition.
The author wishes to express his gratitude to the staff of The MathWorks™, the developers of
MATLAB® and Simulink® for the encouragement and unlimited support they have provided me
with during the production of this text.
Our heartfelt thanks also to Mr. Howard R. Hansen, and Dr. Niel Ransom, former CTO of
Alcatel, for bringing some errors on the first print to our attention.
Orchard Publications
www.orchardpublications.com
[email protected]
Table of Contents
1 Introduction to Simulink 1−1
1.1 Simulink and its Relation to MATLAB ....................................................................1−1
1.2 Simulink Demos ......................................................................................................1−20
1.3 Summary ..................................................................................................................1−28
1.4 Exercises ..................................................................................................................1−29
1.5 Solutions to End−of−Chapter Exercises ..................................................................1−30
References R−1
Index IN−1
T
his chapter is an introduction to Simulink. This author feels that it is best to introduce Sim-
ulink in this chapter with a few examples. Tools for simulation and model−based designs are
presented in the subsequent chapters. Some familiarity with MATLAB is essential in
understanding Simulink, and for this purpose, Appendix A is included as an introduction to
MATLAB.
Example 1.1
For the electric circuit of Figure 1.1, u 0 ( t ) *is the input and the initial conditions are i L ( 0 − ) = 0 ,
and v c ( 0 − ) = 0.5 V . We will compute v C ( t ) .
R L
+
1Ω 1⁄4 H C
+ vC ( t )
−
i(t) 4⁄3 F
−
vs ( t ) = u0 ( t )
Figure 1.1. Circuit for Example 1.1
For this example,
dv
i = i L = i C = C --------C- (1.1)
dt
* Throughout this text, the designation u 0 ( t ) will be used to denote the unit step function. We will use u ( t ) to
denote any other input to be consistent with the MATLAB and Simulink designations.
2
d vC dv
----------- + 4 --------C- + 3v C = 3u 0 ( t ) (1.4)
dt
2 dt
2
d v dv
----------C- + 4 --------C- + 3v C = 3 t>0 (1.5)
dt
2 dt
To appreciate Simulink’s capabilities, for comparison, three different methods of obtaining the
solution are presented, and the solution using Simulink follows.
First Method − Assumed Solution
Equation (1.5) is a second−order, non−homogeneous differential equation with constant coeffi-
cients, and thus the complete solution will consist of the sum of the forced response and the natu-
ral response. It is obvious that the solution of this equation cannot be a constant since the deriva-
tives of a constant are zero and thus the equation is not satisfied. Also, the solution cannot
contain sinusoidal functions (sine and cosine) since the derivatives of these are also sinusoids.
– at
However, decaying exponentials of the form ke where k and a are constants, are possible can-
didates since their derivatives have the same form but alternate in sign.
–s t –s t
It can be shown* that if k 1 e 1 and k 2 e 2 where k 1 and k 2 are constants and s 1 and s 2 are the
roots of the characteristic equation of the homogeneous part of the given differential equation,
–s1 t –s2 t
the natural response is the sum of the terms k 1 e and k 2 e . Therefore, the total solution will
be
* For a thorough discussion, please refer to Circuit Analysis II with MATLAB Applications, ISBN 0−
9709511−5−9, Appendix B.
–t –3 t
vc ( t ) = k1 e + k2 e + v cf ( t ) (1.8)
Since the right side of (1.9) is a constant, the forced response will also be a constant and we
denote it as v Cf = k 3 . By substitution into (1.9) we obtain
0 + 0 + 3k 3 = 3
or
v Cf = k 3 = 1 (1.10)
The constants k 1 and k 2 will be evaluated from the initial conditions. First, using v C ( 0 ) = 0.5 V
and evaluating (1.11) at t = 0 , we obtain
0 0
v C ( 0 ) = k 1 e + k 2 e + 1 = 0.5
k 1 + k 2 = – 0.5 (1.12)
Also,
dv C dv C i
i L = i C = C ---------, --------- = ---L-
dt dt C
and
dv iL ( 0 ) 0
--------C- = -----------
- = ---- = 0 (1.13)
dt t=0
C C
Simultaneous solution of (1.12) and (1.15), gives k 1 = – 0.75 and k 2 = 0.25 . By substitution into
(1.8), we obtain the total solution as
–t –3 t
v C ( t ) = ( – 0.75 e + 0.25e + 1 )u 0 ( t ) (1.16)
3 ⁄ 4s 2
0.5s + 2s + 3-
V C ( s ) = ---------------------------------------------- ⋅ ⎛ 1 -------⎞ + 0.5
--- – 0.5 1.5 - + 0.5
------- = -------------------------------- ------- = -----------------------------------
( 1 + 0.25s + 3 ⁄ 4s ) ⎝ s s ⎠ s 2
s ( s + 4s + 3 ) s s(s + 1)(s + 3)
2
0.5s + 2s + 3-
r 2 = --------------------------------- = – 0.75
s(s + 3) s = –1
2
0.5s + 2s + 3-
r 3 = --------------------------------- = 0.25
s(s + 1) s = –3
* For derivation of the voltage division and current division expressions, please refer to Circuit Analysis I with
MATLAB Applications, ISBN 0−9709511−2−4.
† A thorough discussion of partial fraction expansion with MATLAB Applications is presented in Numerical
Analysis Using MATLAB and Excel, ISBN 978−1−934404−03−4.
‡ For an introduction to Laplace Transform and Inverse Laplace Transform, please refer to Circuit Analysis II
with MATLAB Applications, ISBN 0−9709511−5−9.
** Usually, in State−Space and State Variables Analysis, u ( t ) denotes any input. For distinction, we will denote
the Unit Step Function as u0 ( t ) . For a detailed discussion on State−Space and State Variables Analysis, please
refer to Signals and Systems with MATLAB Computing and Simulink Modeling , ISBN 0−9744239−9−8.
1--- di
------L- = ( – 1 )i L – v C + 1
4 dt
or
di L
------- = – 4i L – 4v C + 4 (1.19)
dt
di
x· 1 = ------L- * (1.20)
dt
and
dv
x· 2 = --------C- (1.21)
dt
Also,
dv
i L = C --------C-
dt
and thus,
dv 4
x 1 = i L = C --------C- = Cx· 2 = --- x· 2
dt 3
or
3
x· 2 = --- x 1 (1.22)
4
Therefore, from (1.19), (1.20), and (1.22), we obtain the state equations
x· 1 = – 4x 1 – 4x 2 + 4
3
x· 2 = --- x 1
4
and in matrix form,
x· 1
= –4 –4 1 + 4 u0 ( t )
x
(1.23)
x· 2 3 ⁄ 4 0 x2 0
* The notation x· (x dot) is often used to denote the first derivative of the function x , that is, x· = dx ⁄ dt .
† The detailed solution of (1.23) is given in Signals and Systems with MATLAB Applications, ISBN 0−
9744239−9−8, Chapter 5.
Upon execution of the Simulink command, the Commonly Used Blocks are shown in Figure
1.4.
In Figure 1.4, the left side is referred to as the Tree Pane and displays all Simulink libraries
installed. The right side is referred to as the Contents Pane and displays the blocks that reside in
the library currently selected in the Tree Pane.
A block diagram representing (1.26) is shown in Figure 1.5. Now, we will use Simulink to draw a
similar block diagram.
−4
−3
1. On the Simulink Library Browser, we click the leftmost icon shown as a blank page on
the top title bar. A new model window named untitled will appear as shown in Figure 1.6.
Figure 1.8. Dragging the unit step function into File Equation_1_26
Figure 1.9. File Equation_1_26 with added Step and Gain blocks
5. Next, we need to add a thee−input adder. The adder block appears on the right side of the
Simulink Library Browser under Math Operations. We select it, and we drag it into the
Equation_1_26 model window. We double click it, and on the Function Block Parameters
window which appears, we specify 3 inputs. We then connect the output of the Step block to
the input of the Gain block, and the output of the of the Gain block to the first input of the
Add block as shown in Figure 1.10.
Figure 1.10. File Equation_1_26 with added Add block and connections between the blocks
6. From the Commonly Used Blocks of the Simulink Library Browser, we choose the Integra-
tor block, we drag it into the Equation_1_26 model window, and we connect it to the output
of the Add block. We repeat this step and to add a second Integrator block. We click the text
“Integrator” under the first integrator block, and we change it to Integrator 1. Then, we
change the text “Integrator 1” under the second Integrator to “Integrator 2” as shown in Fig-
ure 1.11.
double−click the Unit block and in the Source Block Parameters window we change the
Step time value from 1 to 0. We leave all other parameters in their default state. We also need
to specify the simulation time. This is done by specifying the simulation time to be 10 seconds
on the Configuration Parameters from the Simulation drop menu. We can start the simula-
tion on Start from the Simulation drop menu or by clicking the icon.
9. To see the output waveform, we double click the Scope block, and then clicking on the
Autoscale icon. Then we right−click near the vertical axis, we click on Axes properties,
we specify Y−min =0, Y−max = 1.5, we click OK, and we obtain the waveform shown in Fig-
ure 1.13. Henceforth, we will use this procedure to scale the vertical axis in our subsequent
Scope block displays.
Figure 1.14. Obtaining the function v C ( t ) for Example 1.1 with the State−Space block.
We double−click the State−Space block, and in the Functions Block Parameters window we
enter the constants shown in Figure 1.15.
Figure 1.15. The Function block parameters for the State−Space block.
* who displays only the variables names, not the function to which each variable belongs. whos lists
more information about each variable.
The initials conditions [ x1 x2 ]' are specified at the MATLAB command prompt as
x1=0; x2=0.5;
As before, to start the simulation we click the icon, and to see the output waveform, we dou-
ble click the Scope block. Then we click on the Autoscale icon, and we scale the vertical
axis as we did with the waveform of Figure 1.13. The waveform shown in Figure 1.16.
Figure 1.16. The waveform for the function v C ( t ) for Example 1.1 with the State−Space block.
The state−space block is the best choice when we need to display the output waveform of three or
more variables as illustrated by the following example.
Example 1.2
A fourth−order network is described by the differential equation
4 3 2
d y d y d y dy
--------- + a 3 --------3- + a 2 -------2- + a 1 ------ + a 0 y ( t ) = u ( t ) (1.27)
dt
4
dt dt dt
where y ( t ) is the output representing the voltage or current of the network, and u ( t ) is any input,
and the initial conditions are y ( 0 ) = y' ( 0 ) = y'' ( 0 ) = y''' ( 0 ) = 0 .
a. We will express (1.27) as a set of state equations
subject to the initial conditions y ( 0 ) = y' ( 0 ) = y'' ( 0 ) = y''' ( 0 ) = 0 , has the solution
2
y ( t ) = 0.125 [ ( 3 – t ) – 3t cos t ] (1.29)
In our set of state equations, we will select appropriate values for the coefficients
a 3, a 2, a 1, and a 0 so that the new set of the state equations will represent the differential equa-
tion of (1.28) and using Simulink, we will display the waveform of the output y ( t ) .
1. The differential equation of (1.28) is of fourth−order; therefore, we must define four state vari-
ables that will be used with the four first−order state equations.
We denote the state variables as x 1, x 2, x 3 , and x 4 , and we relate them to the terms of the
given differential equation as
2 3
dy d y d y
x1 = y ( t ) x 2 = ------ x 3 = --------- x 4 = --------- (1.30)
dt 2 3
dt dt
We observe that
x· 1 = x 2
x· 2 = x 3
x· 3 = x 4 (1.31)
4
d y
--------- = x· 4 = – a 0 x 1 – a 1 x 2 – a 2 x 3 – a 3 x 4 + u ( t )
4
dt
and in matrix form
x· 1 0 1 0 0 x1 0
x· 2 0 0 1 0 x2
= + 0 u(t) (1.32)
x· 3 0 0 0 1 x3 0
x· 4 –a0 –a1 –a2 –a3 x4 1
x· 1 0 1 0 0 x1 0
x· 2 0 0 1 0 x2
x· = , A= , x= , b= 0, and u = u ( t ) (1.35)
x· 3 0 0 0 1 x3 0
x· 4 –a0 –a1 –a2 –a3 x4 1
x1
x2
y = [1 0 0 0] ⋅ + [ 0 ]u ( t ) (1.36)
x3
x4
2. By inspection the differential equation of (1.27) will be reduced to the differential equation of
(1.28) if we let
a3 = 0 a2 = 2 a1 = 0 a0 = 1 u ( t ) = sin t
and thus the differential equation of (1.28) can be expressed in state−space form as
x· 1 0 1 0 0 x1 0
x· 2 0 0 1 0 x2
= + 0 sin t (1.37)
x· 3 0 0 0 1 x3 0
x· 4 –a0 0 –2 0 x4 1
where
x· 1 0 1 0 0 x1 0
x· 2 0 0 1 0 x2
x· = , A= , x= , b= 0, and u = sin t (1.38)
x· 3 0 0 0 1 x3 0
x· 4 –a0 0 –2 0 x4 1
x1
x2
y = [1 0 0 0] ⋅ + [ 0 ] sin t (1.39)
x3
x4
We invoke MATLAB, we start Simulink by clicking on the Simulink icon, on the Simulink
Library Browser, we click the Create a new model (blank page icon on the left of the top
bar), and we save this model as Example_1_2. On the Simulink Library Browser we select
Sources, we drag the Signal Generator block on the Example_1_2 model window, we click
and drag the State−Space block from the Continuous on Simulink Library Browser, and we
click and drag the Scope block from the Commonly Used Blocks on the Simulink Library
Browser. We also add the Display block found under Sinks on the Simulink Library
Browser. We connect these four blocks and the complete block diagram is as shown in Figure
1.17.
Figure 1.17. Model for Example 1.2 with the entries specified below
We now double−click the Signal Generator block and we enter the following in the Function
Block Parameters dialog box the following:
Wave form: sine
Time (t): Use simulation time
Amplitude: 1
Frequency: 2
Units: Hertz
Next, we double−click the State−Space block and we enter the following parameter values in
the Function Block Parameters:
A: [0 1 0 0; 0 0 1 0; 0 0 0 1; −a0 −a1 −a2 −a3]
B: [0 0 0 1]’
C: [1 0 0 0]
D: [0]
Initial conditions: x0
Absolute tolerance: auto
Now, we switch to the MATLAB Command window and at the command prompt we type the
following values:
a0=1; a1=0; a2=2; a3=0; x0=[0 0 0 0]’;
We change the Simulation Stop time to 25 , and we start the simulation by clicking on the
icon. To see the output waveform, we double− click the Scope block, then we click the
Examples 1.1 and 1.2 have clearly illustrated that the State−Space is indeed a powerful block. We
could have also obtained the solution of Example 1.2 using four Integrator blocks.
Example 1.3
We will create a model that will produce the simultaneous solution of three equations with three
unknowns using Algebraic Constraint blocks found in the Math Operations library, Display
blocks found in the Sinks library, and Gain blocks found in the Commonly Used Blocks library.
The model will display the values for the unknowns z 1 , z 2 , and z 3 for the system of the equations
a1 z1 + a2 z2 + a3 z3 + k1 = 0
a4 z1 + a5 z2 + a6 z3 + k2 = 0 (1.40)
a7 z1 + a8 z2 + a9 z3 + k3 = 0
Figure 1.19. Model for Example 1.3 with the entries specified below
Next, at the MATLAB command prompt we enter the following values:
a1=2; a2=−3; a3=−1; a4=1; a5=5; a6=4; a7=−6; a8=1; a9=2;...
k1=−8; k2=−7; k3=5;
After clicking on the simulation icon, we obtain the values of the unknowns as z 1 = 2 , z 2 = – 3 ,
and z 3 = 5 as shown in the Display blocks in Figure 1.19.
An Algebraic Constraint block constrains the input signal f ( z ) to zero, outputs a value for z ,
and this value eventually produces a zero at the input. Thus, output is fed back to the input via a
feedback path. We can improve the efficiency of the algebraic loop solver by providing an initial
guess for the algebraic state z that is close to the final solution value. By default, the initial guess
value is zero.
For instance, to group all blocks and lines in the model of Figure 1.19 except the display blocks,
from the Edit drop menu we choose Create Subsystem and this model will be shown as in Figure
1.20* where at the MATLAB command prompt we have entered the following values:
a1=5; a2=−1; a3=4; a4=11; a5=6; a6=9; a7=−8; a8=4; a9=15;...
k1=14; k2=−6; k3=9;
The Display blocks in Figure 1.20 show the values of z 1 , z 2 , and z 3 for the values that we speci-
fied at the MATLAB command prompt above.
The Subsystem block is described in detail in Chapter 2, Section 2.1, Page 2−2.
1.2 Simulink Demos
At this time, the reader with no prior knowledge of Simulink, should be ready to learn Simulink’s
additional capabilities. We will explore other features in the subsequent chapters. However, it is
highly recommended that the reader becomes familiar with the block libraries found in the Sim-
ulink Library Browser. Then, the reader can follow the steps delineated in The MathWorks Sim-
ulink User’s Manual to run the Demo Models beginning with the thermo model. This model can
invoked by typing thermo at the MATLAB command prompt.
In the subsequent chapters, we will study each of the blocks under each of libraries in the Tree
Pane. They are listed in Table 1.1 below in alphabetical order, the library where they appear, the
chapter where they are described in this text, section/subsection, and page number in which they
are described.
* The contents of the Subsystem block are not lost. We can double−click on the Subsystem block to see its con-
tents. The Subsystem block replaces the inputs and outputs of the model with Inport and Outport blocks. These
blocks along with the Subsystem block are described in Section 2.1, Chapter 2, Page 2−2.
ing on the icon. To see the output waveform, we double click on the Scope block, and
1.4 Exercises
1. Use Simulink with the Step function block, the Continuous−Time Transfer Fcn block, and
the Scope block shown, to simulate and display the output waveform v C of the electric RLC
circuit* shown below where u 0 ( t ) is the unit step function, and the initial conditions are
i L ( 0 ) = 0 , and v C ( 0 ) = 0 .
1Ω L C +
+ vC
−
u0 t 1H iL 1F −
2. Repeat Exercise 1 using integrator blocks in lieu of the transfer function block.
3. Repeat Exercise 1 using the State Space block in lieu of the transfer function block.
4. Using the State−Space block, create a model for the differential equation shown below.
2
d v C dv C
----------- + --------- + v C = 2 sin ( t + 30° ) – 5 cos ( t + 60° )
2 dt
dt
* The electric circuits presented in this texts can be easily converted to their mechanical equivalent circuits where
a voltage source can be replaced by a force f, a resistor can be replaced by a dashpot B, an inductor can be
replaced by a mass M, and a capacitor can be replaced by an inverse spring constant 1/K. Thus the mechanical
analog of the electric circuit above can be converted to the mechanical system shown below.
1⁄K
B
f
M
x1 x2 x3
1.
The s−domain equivalent circuit is shown below.
1
1 + +
--- Ls V C ( s ) = V OUT ( s )
s −
V IN ( s ) 1/sC −
1
+
--- +
1
s V C ( s ) = V OUT ( s )
s − 1/s −
V IN ( s )
As we know, the unit step function is undefined at t = 0 . Therefore, we double click the Step
block, and in the Source Block Parameters dialog box shown below we enter the values indi-
cated. Likewise, we double click the Transfer Fcn block and in the Source Block Parameters
dialog box we enter the values indicated.
FOOTNOTES:
[5] Note the insensibility.—W.W.S.
[6] Note.—In future I shall borrow the term "Etheric Double" from
the Theosophists and use it instead of the rather cumbrous
phrase "Quasi-physical replica." I do not think that the term
Etheric Double is a good one, but it is in common use, and I will
adopt it until some better word is suggested.
CHAPTER VIII
THE RELIGIOUS ASPECTS OF THE HYPOTHESIS
Although I have no wish to become involved in controversial
theology, I feel it incumbent on me to examine briefly the question
of whether a general acceptance of the four-dimensional hypothesis
would be fraught with any considerable consequences in the sphere
of religious thought.
No one venturing to advocate conceptions so far-reaching as those I
have been discussing, would be justified in ignoring their relation to
any important stream of thought with which they might be held
liable to come in contact. And it is evident that any hypothesis
formulated, however tentatively, as a solution to the problems of
Survival of Death and the nature of post-mortem conditions, must
inevitably come into very close contact with Religion.
I shall try to show that it is a matter of contact only and not of
conflict.
Even so, I might have omitted the present discussion had I not
found a tendency, on the part of certain representatives of orthodox
theology, to deprecate any attempt to find an intelligible solution to
the problems involved.
It must be clearly understood that I am not concerned here with the
defence of Psychical Research as a means of investigation, but only
with the legitimacy of the end.
Generally speaking, those with whom I am so unfortunate as to
disagree on this matter accuse me on two counts.
First it is suggested that I am attempting to advance by Reason or
Sight rather than by Faith and, secondly, I am told that to "explain"
such a matter as the Survival of Death or the nature of the
connection between matter and spirit, would tend to reduce
everything to terms of mere mechanism and to leave no place at all
in the Cosmos for Divine Will and Purpose or for the transcendental
and mystical aspects of religion.
I need hardly say that I violently resent both these accusations.
The first charge seems to me to be easy of refutation.
In the first place the idea of "Blind Faith" or "Unreasoning Belief" is
one which involves a contradiction in terms.
As Whately well says in his "Logic":
"If a man resolves that he will implicitly receive e.g., in
religious points, all the decisions of a certain Pastor,
Church or Party, he has in doing so performed one act of
private judgment (i.e., the result of reasoning), which
includes all the rest."
Hence it is impossible to dissociate Faith and Reason.
Secondly, just as Courage, in its proper sense, does not mean feeling
no fear but the overcoming of it; so Faith consists, not of having no
doubts but of dispelling them, and this involves a deliberate exercise
of the will in choosing between two possible alternatives; that is to
say, an act of reasoning.
Thirdly, I submit that Life is not a sort of crazy competition in which
special awards are to be received for completing the course
blindfold, but a phase in the general upward progress of man—
whether considered collectively or individually—and that
consequently any knowledge is desirable which will enable us
consciously and intelligently to co-operate in the process.
Finally, and I think that this puts the whole matter in one sentence,
however clearly a man can see, he must still be able to believe his
eyes.
However plainly we can see the path, we must still believe that it
leads in the right direction, however conclusively we may
demonstrate a proposition, we are still dependent on our Faith in the
validity of Reason and the veridicity of the observations on which it
is based—and this is equally the case whether the latter be scientific
measurements or spiritual experiences.
The supreme effort of Faith, made by the most material of scientists
no less than by the Saint, is the belief that the Cosmos, of which
Reason is a part, is a coherent whole and not a Chaos.
The second argument appears to me to be equally fissiparous.
In the first place I should never dream of attempting to reduce the
whole Cosmos to terms of mechanism.
Any such idea would be infinitely repugnant to me. Moreover, the
attempt would inevitably be foredoomed to failure since there are
problems which are essentially insoluble. The first and most obvious
of all—the problem of the nature and origin of Consciousness—is
one to which we can never hope to find an answer.
But quite apart from all this I entirely fail to see why the explanation
of mechanism, using the word in its widest sense, should have any
bearing on religion at all.
Religion, by which I mean something more than a mere code of
morals, is concerned rather with motives than with methods.
If a child were to ask one why the sun and moon did not fall on to
the earth, one might reply to the effect that they were prevented
from doing so by the exercise of the Divine Will. Alternatively one
might embark on a disquisition about the law of gravitation and
planetary mechanics.
The two forms of explanation would be by no means mutually
exclusive since the second does no more than expand the first by an
exposition of the means employed.
If, as required by the Christian religion, we believe in the survival of
the individual personality after death, it is evident that this survival
must take place by virtue of certain properties inherent in the
Cosmos and the necessity of Faith in our ultimate destiny will not be
affected by any determination of the nature of those properties.
If our Consciousness does in fact persist after death it must do so in
some state of embodiment, since the idea of pure essence is
inconceivable.
For my part I utterly fail to understand why the study of the nature
of the vehicle in which the consciousness functions after death, or of
the conditions in which it lives, has any more to do with religion, in
the proper sense of the term, than the study of the physical body
and the physical world.
I need hardly say that I do not anticipate that Psychic Research will
confirm the idea of the old-fashioned conventional Heaven and Hell
of harps and crowns on the one hand and fire and brimstone on the
other. But it would be a bold person who would be prepared to
maintain now-a-days that these ideas form an integral part of
Christianity.
Modern research on Evolution and the process of natural selection
have somewhat notably discounted the story of Adam and Eve in the
garden of Eden, considered as historical fact. But it would be difficult
to maintain that the Christian religion has suffered as a
consequence.
The account of the creation given in Genesis has had to be re-
interpreted in the light of geological and astronomical knowledge,
but Christianity is as vital a force in the world to-day as it was when
that account was taken literally word for word.
Even so, if any specific revelation existed on the subject of the
manner of survival, if, for instance, any of the words of Christ could
be held to contain any precise information on the subject, it might
be contended that no further knowledge was necessary. But this is
not the case.
Immortality is insisted on, but nothing specific is said of the
conditions by virtue of which it obtains. Nor, so far as I am aware, is
any veto laid on endeavours to ascertain those conditions.
I repeat that in my opinion, cosmic mechanism and religion are
distinct, and no knowledge, however full, as to the former can
possibly either impair or replace the latter.
In short I do not see that the necessity for religion as an integral
part of life would be one whit diminished even supposing we knew
as much about the "next world" and conditions of life therein, as we
know of this.
And this contention holds good no matter what results research may
bring to light, no matter how much they may differ from our
preconceived ideas.
For the truth is there all the time although at the moment we may
not have grasped it and the Christian religion, if it be the true
religion, as we believe, was framed, so to speak, to meet the needs
of a cosmos organised in this particular way and in no other.
Unless, therefore, the Christian religion be false, it is impossible that
the results of research, supposing them to be accurate and reliable,
—a matter which can only be ensured by the exercise of scientific
reason,—should in any way conflict with religious truth.
In case any one should feel that I ought to specify more precisely
than I have done, what I mean by the Christian religion, I would
refer them to the Nicene creed. Or if it is a matter of the
interpretation of this in terms of conduct, I should cite "My duty
towards God" and "My duty towards my neighbour" in the Church
Catechism. Or in secular writings I would mention that view of
Christianity which is defended by Mr. G.K. Chesterton in his book
"Orthodoxy."
With these I am prepared to stand four-square, although it is
conceivable that I might find myself at variance with some
authorities on the precise interpretation to be given to certain
clauses, as for instance "the resurrection of the dead" in the first
mentioned.
But controversies about interpretation have been rife among
Christian theorists from the earliest times and differences of opinion
on minor points do not constitute lack of adherence in fundamentals.
Hitherto in this discussion I have been concerned only with
negatives. That is to say I have been trying to show that there is
nothing in the attempt which has led me to adopt the four-
dimensional hypothesis which is in any way contrary to the essential
teachings of Christianity.
There is however a positive side to the question.
I believe that so far from being antagonistic to Christian teaching,
the general acceptance of the hypothesis would be of real value, in
that it would put into the hands of the Church a very powerful
weapon for the repelling of a certain form of attack, that of the
scientific materialist to wit.
I do not mean to claim this as a merit of the four-dimensional
hypothesis as such, for it would equally accrue to any other
hypothesis which might prove to be true.
In the second chapter I gave my reasons for believing that the
establishing of some such hypothesis would be calculated to remove
the principle cause of dissension between religious and
materialistically scientific thinkers. I there pointed out that the chief
strength of the materialist lay in the reluctance or inability of the
Church to give an intelligible explanation of the terms used in
speaking of certain religious and spiritual matters.
I have explained that I see nothing in anyway repugnant to religion
in the attempt to formulate an hypothesis to explain the mechanism
of survival, etc.
Equally it should be observed that religion, considered as something
more than a mere ethical and moral code, would be in no way freed
from the necessity of justifying itself, qua religion, by the
acceptance, however unanimous, of this or any other hypothesis.
Such justification is a matter for an apologetic of quite another order,
of which order, by the way, I regard Mr. Chesterton's "Orthodoxy"
mentioned above as a very admirable example.
What the general acceptance of such an hypothesis would do, would
be finally and for ever to deprive the materialist of the possibility of
maintaining that matter, as he knows it, is the final and only
permanent reality and that Spirit therefore cannot exist.
It is true that this would only involve driving him back one stage. If
we suppose for the sake of argument that we could finally attain to
as complete a knowledge of the "next world" as we at present
possess of this, he could always return to the attack, using with
regard to that state the same arguments as he originally used with
regard to this. But having once broken through the ring fence of
matter and demonstrated that there exist other realities of which he
was at one time entirely ignorant, he could never deny that there
might still be realms as yet unknown to him. He could never catch
us again, so to speak.
I admit that the above is a somewhat fantastical supposition and
scarcely within the sphere of practical politics, but the point is, that
until we are prepared to give an intelligible explanation of things we
are pent up in a sort of intellectual cul-de-sac bounded by matter.
We may know, as the result of personal experience, that there is a
way out, that matter is not the only reality; but our knowledge is a
purely personal affair and the scientist is perfectly entitled, if he
wishes, to decline to take the steps that led to the experiences
which have convinced us, to dismiss them as mere hallucinations
and to write off our alleged "revelations" as superstitious myths.
But let us once demonstrate to him, in a manner calculated to
appeal to his intellect, that there may be a non-material reality and
the cul-de-sac is at once broken through and becomes a vista.
It may be one of which we cannot see the end, and we shall
certainly require faith to believe that it leads to the right destination,
but the point is that it is a vista and not a cul-de-sac.
This is where I am convinced that the adoption of some hypothesis
of the same general order as that which I have been advocating
would prove of definite value to the Church and that is why I am so
Welcome to Our Bookstore - The Ultimate Destination for Book Lovers
Are you passionate about books and eager to explore new worlds of
knowledge? At our website, we offer a vast collection of books that
cater to every interest and age group. From classic literature to
specialized publications, self-help books, and children’s stories, we
have it all! Each book is a gateway to new adventures, helping you
expand your knowledge and nourish your soul
Experience Convenient and Enjoyable Book Shopping Our website is more
than just an online bookstore—it’s a bridge connecting readers to the
timeless values of culture and wisdom. With a sleek and user-friendly
interface and a smart search system, you can find your favorite books
quickly and easily. Enjoy special promotions, fast home delivery, and
a seamless shopping experience that saves you time and enhances your
love for reading.
Let us accompany you on the journey of exploring knowledge and
personal growth!
ebookgate.com