Introduction to Structural Analysis
Introduction to Structural Analysis
Structural Analysis
Introduction to
Structural Analysis
Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and pub-
lisher cannot assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use.
The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in
this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been
obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may
rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced,
transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or here-
after invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or
retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, access www.copyright.com
or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, 978-
750-8400. For works that are not available on CCC please contact [email protected]
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks and are used
only for identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003081227
Typeset in Times
by KnowledgeWorks Global Ltd.
Contents
Preface.................................................................................................................... xiii
Authors ..................................................................................................................... xv
Chapter 8 Beams and Frames, Shear, and Bending Moments .......................... 121
8.1 Introduction ........................................................................... 121
8.2 Axial Force, Shear, and Bending Moments .......................... 121
8.3 Shear and Bending Moment Diagrams for a Beam............... 122
8.4 Qualitative Discussion on the Deflected Shape of
Beams .................................................................................... 128
8.5 Relationships between Loads, Shear, and Bending
Moments ................................................................................ 130
8.6 Shear and Bending Moment Diagram of Frames .................. 136
Chapter 11 Rolling Loads and Influence Lines and Their Applications ............ 181
11.1 Introduction ........................................................................... 181
11.2 Influence Lines for Beams and Frames by Equilibrium
Method................................................................................... 181
11.3 Qualitative Influence Lines and Müller-Breslau’s
Principle................................................................................. 188
11.3.1 Müller-Breslau Principle .......................................... 188
11.4 Influence Lines for Floor Girders .......................................... 190
11.5 Influence Lines for Trusses ................................................... 194
11.6 Maximum Influence at a Point Due to a Series of
Concentrated Loads ............................................................... 197
Contents ix
xiii
xiv Preface
We thank you all for choosing this book for your course work, and we wish all
the best to everyone on their future endeavors and successful careers in this exciting
field.
Debabrata Podder
Santanu Chatterjee
December 2021
Authors
Dr. Debabrata Podder is currently working as an Assistant Professor (CE) at
National Institute of Technology Meghalaya, India. He has completed his engineering
education from Jadavpur University and Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur.
After a brief stint as a civil engineer at Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Ltd., Mumbai,
he took to academics. He has published the book, Residual Stresses, Distortions
and Their Mitigation for Fusion Welding (ISBN: 978-3-659-94213-6) and papers in
several peer-reviewed journals. His research interests include finite element model-
ling and simulation of engineering structures, theoretical and computational solid
mechanics, structural analysis and design, and welding-induced deformations and
residual stresses.
xv
Part I
Introduction to Structural
Analysis, Loads, Material,
and Section Properties
Introduction to
1 Structural Analysis
1.1 INTRODUCTION
This chapter provides a general introduction to the subject of structural analysis
and development of this subject from ancient ages to modern days with the help of
various engineers, scientists, and philosophers. Some historical structures with their
distinct characteristic features are also discussed in this chapter. One should have
some knowledge of the historical backgrounds and time-to-time development of this
rich and important subject. This chapter will increase interest and zeal in learning
this subject by heart and setting deeper insight that may open up new avenues of the
analysis process to enhance and enrich this subject to the next level.
DOI: 10.1201/9781003081227-2 3
4 Introduction to Structural Analysis
For determining sizes of structural members, the Egyptians, the Indus Valley
Civilians, and other ancient builders surely had some kinds of empirical rules
drawn from their previous experiences because, regarding the development of
any theory of structural analysis, there is, however, no evidence found from their
civilizations.
The ancient Greeks (1200–323 BCE) are famously known for their Post and
Lintel-type constructions. Their magnificent Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian order tem-
ples were of such types. The example par excellence is undoubtedly the Parthenon
(Figure 1.2) of Athens, built in the mid-5th century BCE. The temple was built to
house the gigantic statue of Athena and advertise to the world the glory of Athens,
which still stands majestically on the city’s acropolis.
Although the ancient Greeks were blessed with many famous mathematicians,
physicists, inventors, philosophers, scientists, and they also built some magnificent
structures, their contributions to structural theory and analysis were few and far
between. Pythagoras of Samos (about 582–500 BCE) is famous for the right-angle
theorem that bears his name. However, a Babylonian clay tablet confirms that this
theorem was known by the Sumerians in about 2000 BCE. Archimedes of Syracuse
(287–212 BCE) developed some fundamental principles of statics and introduced the
term center of gravity.
The ancient Romans (753 BCE–476 CE) were also excellent builders. Alongside
various Post and Lintel constructions, they mastered the art of building arches,
vaults, and domes, which helped them to cover wider space more easily. Their mas-
tery was further enhanced by the development of concrete (opus caementicium),
which was typically made from a mixture of lime mortar, water, sand, pozzolana,
Introduction to Structural Analysis 5
tuff, travertine, brick, and rubbles. Some of the unusual additives were also mixed
with this concrete, such as horsehair, which made the concrete less prone to crack-
ing; animal blood that increased the resistance to frost damage. By implementing
their methods, Romans built various temples, basilicas, pantheons, theatres, amphi-
theaters, public baths, triumphal arches, bridges, aqueducts, roads, lighthouses, etc.
But like Greeks, they too had very less knowledge of structural analysis and made
even less scientific progress in structural theory. They built their majestic structures
from an artistic point of view based on various empirical rules gained from their past
experiences. If those rules got clicked, the structures would have been survived, or
else it got collapsed.
Karl-Eugen Kurrer in his book, ‘The History of the Theory of Structures:
Searching for Equilibrium’, divided the evolution history of structural analysis
into some particular periods and broke those down further into phases as shown in
Figure 1.3.
The preparatory period (1575–1825) of the development and evolution of struc-
tural analysis stretches over around 250 years and is characterized by the direct
application of mathematics and mechanics of that time to simple load-bearing ele-
ments in structures. During this time, buildings and structures were designed mostly
based on empirical knowledge and theory. The theory was evident primarily in the
form of geometrical design and dimensioning rules. This period mainly focused on
the formulation of beam theory. The orientation phase (1575–1700) is characterized
by the sciences (mathematics and mechanics) of this new age discovering the build-
ing industry. In the middle of this phase (1638), the final book of Galileo, ‘Discorsi e
Dimostrazioni Matematiche, intorno a due nuove scienze (Dialogue Concerning
Two New Sciences)’, was published, which is a scientific testament covering much of
6 Introduction to Structural Analysis
his work in Physics over the preceding 30 years. Galileo’s Dialogue contributed ele-
ments of strength of materials in the form of first beam theory to the menu, though it
was erroneous. Robert Hooke (1635–1703) took the next step and discovered the law
of elasticity in 1660, which later becomes as Hooke’s law. As for the first time, the
differential and integral calculus appeared around 1700; they found their place as a
tool in the applications of astronomy, theoretical mechanics, geodesy, and construc-
tion for very obvious reasons and thus started the application phase (1700–1775).
Mathematicians and natural scientists such as Leibniz (1646–1716), Bernoulli, and
Leonhard Euler (1707–1783) made progress on the beam theory and the theory of
elastic curve. In the first half of the 18th century, engineering schools were devel-
oped for the very first time in France where a scientific self-conception based on the
Introduction to Structural Analysis 7
increase in the use of reinforced concrete, plate and shell structures became an
area of study in the middle of the accumulation phase. The coherent and consistent
arrangement of structural analysis arose out of the principle of virtual displace-
ments at the end of this phase. The contents of structural analysis became tested
and consolidated from the inputs/challenges of the multiple disciplines such as rein-
forced concrete construction, mechanical and plant engineering, crane-building,
and, finally, aircraft engineering. In the invention phase (1925–1950), structural
analysis was characterized by several new developments, such as the theory of
plates and shell structures, development of displacement method alongside the force
method, inclusion of nonlinear phenomena (second-order theory, plasticity), and
formation of numerical methods.
The aircraft industry also reached their limits due to the continuous demands
of rationalizing the calculations of airplane structures in the integration period
(from 1950 to date). To make the airplanes lightweight and stable under the action
of dynamic loads, engineers were lacking some reliable numerical tools where
the whole body can be subdivided into some finite number of elements, consider-
ing them individually in the mechanical sense and then again putting them back
together choosing the right boundary conditions. What is exactly the creator of the
finite element method – Turner, Clough, Martin, and Topp – did in 1956. In the
innovation phase (1950–1975), modern structural mechanics emerged into a theo-
retical level and practical level automation of the structural calculations was initi-
ated. Various numerical methods mostly the finite element method gained more
and more popularity in this phase. In 1960, Ray William Clough (1920–2016)
gave this name, and in 1967, Olgierd Cecil Zienkiewicz (1921–2009) and Yau
Kai Cheung outlined it in a monograph for the first time. In the diffusion phase
(from 1975 to date), the introduction of desktop computers, computer networks,
and lastly the Internet revolutionized computer-assisted structural calculations into
everyday reality.
be long enough than this, and to meet higher design life, necessary coefficients for
load increment and material degradation need to be considered in the design steps.
However, for all structural engineers, necessary analysis steps need to be mastered
well before carrying out any real-life projects. Without complete understanding the
nature of critical loads and their combinations, a structure cannot be declared safe
for human use. The various phases of a structural engineering project are shown in
Figure 1.4.
References
ASCE Standard Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and other Structures. (2010) ASCE/SEI 7-
10, American Society of Civil Engineers, Virginia.
Arbabi, F. (1991) Structural Analysis and Behavior. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Bathe, K.J., and Wilson, E.L. (1976) Numerical Methods in Finite Element Analysis. Prentice
Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Beer, F.P., and Johnston, E.R.., Jr. (1981) Mechanics of Materials. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Betti, E. (1872) II Nuovo Cimento. Series 2, Vols. 7–8.
Boggs, R.G. (1984) Elementary Structural Analysis. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY.
BS 8110-1. (1997) Structural use of Concrete-Part 1: Code of practice for design and
construction.
Chajes, A. (1990) Structural Analysis, 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Colloquim on History of Structures. (1982) Proceedings, International Association for Bridge and
Structural Engineering, Cambridge, England.
Cross, H. (1930) “Analysis of Continuous Frames by Distributing Fixed-End Moments.”
Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers 56, 919–928.
Elias, Z.M. (1986) Theory and Methods of Structural Analysis. Wiley, New York, NY.
Gere, J.M., and Weaver, W. Jr. (1965) Matrix Algebra for Engineers. Van Nostrand Reinhold,
New York, NY.
Glockner, P.G. (1973) “Symmetry in Structural Mechanics.” Journal of the Structural Division,
ASCE 99, 71–89.
Goldstein, H., Poole, C.P., and Safko, J. (2011) Classical Mechanics. Pearson Education, India.
Hibbeler, R.C. (2012) Structural Analysis, 8th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Holzer, S.M. (1985) Computer Analysis of Structures. Elsevier Science, New York, NY.
Hourani, M. (2002) Mathematical Model of Influence Lines for Indeterminate Beams,
Proceeding of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
Exposition, American Society for Engineering Education.
International Building Code. (2012) International Code Council, Chicago, IL.
IS-875 Part – I (1997) Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than
Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures Part 1 – Dead Loads: Unit Weights of Building
Materials and Stored Materials, 2nd ed.
IS-875 Part – II, (1987) Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than
Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures Part 2 – Imposed Loads, 2nd revision, Reaffirmed
2008.
IS 875 Part – III (2015) Indian Standard Code of Practice for Design Loads (Other Than
Earthquake) for Buildings and Structures Part 3 – Wind Loads, 3rd revision.
IS1893 Part – I (2002) Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures
Part – 1 General Provisions and Buildings, 5th revision.
Kassimali, A. (2011) Matrix Analysis of Structures, 2nd ed. Cengage Learning, Stamford, CT.
Kassimali, A. (2014) Structural Analysis, 5th ed. Cengage Learning, Boston, MA.
Kennedy, J.B., and Madugula, M.K.S. (1990) Elastic Analysis of Structures: Classical and
Matrix Methods. Harper & Row, New York, NY.
Laible, J.P. (1985) Structural Analysis. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY.
Langhaar, H.L. (1962) Energy Methods in Applied Mechanics. Wiley, New York, NY.
Laursen, H.A. (1988) Structural Analysis, 3rd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Leet, K.M. (1988) Fundamentals of Structural Analysis. Macmillan, New York, NY.
McCormac, J. (1984) Structural Analysis, 4th ed. Harper & Row, New York, NY.
McCormac, J., and Elling, R.E. (1988) Structural Analysis: a Classical and Matrix Approach.
Harper & Row, New York, NY.
McGuire, W., and Gallagher, R.H. (1979) Matrix Structural Analysis. Wiley, New York, NY.
Maney, G.A. (1915) Studies in Engineering, Bulletin 1. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis,
MN.
Manual for Railway Engineering. (2011) American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of
Way Association, Maryland, VA.
Maxwell, J.C. (1864) “On the Calculations of the Equilibrium and Stiffness of Frames.”
Philosophical Magazine 27, 294–299.
Marium, J.L., and Craig, L.G. (2017) Engineering Mechanics (Part-1 – Statics). Wiley, India.
Noble, B. (1969) Applied Linear Algebra. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Norris, C.H., Wilbur, J.B., and Utku, S. (1976) Elementary Structural Analysis, 3rd ed. McGraw-
Hill, New York, NY.
Parcel, J.H., and Moorman, R.B.B. (1955) Analysis of Statically Indeterminate Structures. Wiley,
New York, NY.
Petroski, H. (1985) To Engineer is Human—The Role of Failure in Successful Design. St.
Martin's Press, New York, NY.
Popov, E.P. (1968) Introduction to Mechanics of Solids. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Rao, D.S.P. (1997) Graphical Methods in Structural Analysis. University Press, India.
Ramamrutham, S., Narayan, R. (2003) Theory of Structures. Dhanpat Rai Publishing Company
(P) LTD., New Delhi.
Timoshenko, S. (1930) Strength of Materials, D. Van Nostrand Company Inc., Toronto, NY,
London.
Uniform building code. (1997), Vol. II.
Vazirani, V.N., Ratwani, M.M. (2002) Analysis of Structures, Vol. II. Khanna Publishers, New
Delhi.
Wang, C.K. (1983) Intermediate Structural Analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.