Cognition .
Cognition .
Cognition is the "mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through
thought, experience, and the senses".[2] It encompasses all aspects of intellectual functions and
processes such as: perception, attention, thought, imagination, intelligence, the formation of
knowledge, memory and working memory, judgment and evaluation, reasoning and computation,
problem-solving and decision-making, comprehension and production of language. Cognitive
processes use existing knowledge to discover new knowledge.
Cognitive processes are analyzed from very different perspectives within different contexts, notably
in the fields of linguistics, musicology, anesthesia, neuroscience, psychiatry, psychology, education,
philosophy, anthropology, biology, systemics, logic, and computer science.[3] These and other
approaches to the analysis of cognition (such as embodied cognition) are synthesized in the
developing field of cognitive science, a progressively autonomous academic discipline.
Etymology
The word cognition dates back to the 15th century, where it meant "thinking and awareness".[4] The
term comes from the Latin noun cognitio ('examination', 'learning', or 'knowledge'), derived from the
verb cognosco, a compound of con ('with') and gnōscō ('know'). The latter half, gnōscō, itself is a
cognate of a Greek verb, gi(g)nósko (γι(γ)νώσκω, 'I know,' or 'perceive').[5][6]
Early studies
Despite the word cognitive itself dating back to the 15th century,[4] attention to cognitive processes
came about more than eighteen centuries earlier, beginning with Aristotle (384–322 BCE) and his
interest in the inner workings of the mind and how they affect the human experience. Aristotle
focused on cognitive areas pertaining to memory, perception, and mental imagery. He placed great
importance on ensuring that his studies were based on empirical evidence, that is, scientific
information that is gathered through observation and conscientious experimentation.[7] Two
millennia later, the groundwork for modern concepts of cognition was laid during the Enlightenment
by thinkers such as John Locke and Dugald Stewart who sought to develop a model of the mind in
which ideas were acquired, remembered and manipulated.[8]
During the very early nineteenth century cognitive models were developed both in philosophy—
particularly by authors writing about the philosophy of mind—and within medicine, especially by
physicians seeking to understand how to cure madness. In Britain, these models were studied in the
academy by scholars such as James Sully at University College London, and they were even used by
politicians when considering the national Elementary Education Act 1870 (33 & 34 Vict. c. 75).[9]
As psychology emerged as a burgeoning field of study in Europe, whilst also gaining a following in
America, scientists such as Wilhelm Wundt, Herman Ebbinghaus, Mary Whiton Calkins, and William
James would offer their contributions to the study of human cognition.
Early theorists
Wilhelm Wundt (1832–1920) emphasized the notion of what he called introspection: examining the
inner feelings of an individual. With introspection, the subject had to be careful with describing their
feelings in the most objective manner possible in order for Wundt to find the information
scientific.[10][11] Though Wundt's contributions are by no means minimal, modern psychologists find
his methods to be too subjective and choose to rely on more objective procedures of
experimentation to make conclusions about the human cognitive process.
Hermann Ebbinghaus (1850–1909) conducted cognitive studies that mainly examined the function
and capacity of human memory. Ebbinghaus developed his own experiment in which he constructed
over 2,000 syllables made out of nonexistent words (for instance, 'EAS'). He then examined his own
personal ability to learn these non-words. He purposely chose non-words as opposed to real words
to control for the influence of pre-existing experience on what the words might symbolize, thus
enabling easier recollection of them.[10][12] Ebbinghaus observed and hypothesized a number of
variables that may have affected his ability to learn and recall the non-words he created. One of the
reasons, he concluded, was the amount of time between the presentation of the list of stimuli and
the recitation or recall of the same. Ebbinghaus was the first to record and plot a "learning curve"
and a "forgetting curve".[13] His work heavily influenced the study of serial position and its effect on
memory
Mary Whiton Calkins (1863–1930) was an influential American pioneer in the realm of psychology.
Her work also focused on human memory capacity. A common theory, called the recency effect, can
be attributed to the studies that she conducted.[14] The recency effect, also discussed in the
subsequent experiment section, is the tendency for individuals to be able to accurately recollect the
final items presented in a sequence of stimuli. Calkin's theory is closely related to the
aforementioned study and conclusion of the memory experiments conducted by Hermann
Ebbinghaus.[15]
William James (1842–1910) is another pivotal figure in the history of cognitive science. James was
quite discontent with Wundt's emphasis on introspection and Ebbinghaus' use of nonsense stimuli.
He instead chose to focus on the human learning experience in everyday life and its importance to
the study of cognition. James' most significant contribution to the study and theory of cognition
was his textbook Principles of Psychology which preliminarily examines aspects of cognition such
as perception, memory, reasoning, and attention.[15]
René Descartes (1596–1650) was a seventeenth-century philosopher who came up with the phrase
"Cogito, ergo sum", which means "I think, therefore I am." He took a philosophical approach to the
study of cognition and the mind, with his Meditations he wanted people to meditate along with him
to come to the same conclusions as he did but in their own free cognition.[16]
Psychology
In psychology, the term "cognition" is usually used within an information processing view of an
individual's psychological functions,[17] and such is the same in cognitive engineering.[18] In the
study of social cognition, a branch of social psychology, the term is used to explain attitudes,
attribution, and group dynamics.[17] However, psychological research within the field of cognitive
science has also suggested an embodied approach to understanding cognition. Contrary to the
traditional computationalist approach, embodied cognition emphasizes the body's significant role in
the acquisition and development of cognitive capabilities.[19][20]
Human cognition is conscious and unconscious, concrete or abstract, as well as intuitive (like
knowledge of a language) and conceptual (like a model of a language). It encompasses processes
such as memory, association, concept formation, pattern recognition, language, attention,
perception, action, problem solving, and mental imagery.[21][22] Traditionally, emotion was not
thought of as a cognitive process, but now much research is being undertaken to examine the
cognitive psychology of emotion; research is also focused on one's awareness of one's own
strategies and methods of cognition, which is called metacognition. The concept of cognition has
gone through several revisions through the development of disciplines within psychology.
For years, sociologists and psychologists have conducted studies on cognitive development, i.e. the
construction of human thought or mental processes.
Jean Piaget was one of the most important and influential people in the field of developmental
psychology. He believed that humans are unique in comparison to animals because we have the
capacity to do "abstract symbolic reasoning". His work can be compared to Lev Vygotsky, Sigmund
Freud, and Erik Erikson who were also great contributors in the field of developmental psychology.
Piaget is known for studying the cognitive development in children, having studied his own three
children and their intellectual development, from which he would come to a theory of cognitive
development that describes the developmental stages of childhood.[25]
Stage Age or Period Description[26]
Symbols or language skills are present; memory and imagination are developed;
Toddler and Early
Preoperational non-reversible and non-logical thinking; shows intuitive problem solving; begins
Childhood (2–7
stage to perceive relationships; grasps the concept of conservation of numbers;
years)
predominantly egocentric thinking.
Beginning of cognition
Studies on cognitive development have also been conducted in children beginning from the
embryonal period to understand when cognition appears and what environmental attributes
stimulate the construction of human thought or mental processes. Research shows the intentional
engagement of fetuses with the environment, demonstrating cognitive achievements.[27] However,
organisms with simple reflexes cannot cognize the environment alone because the environment is
the cacophony of stimuli (electromagnetic waves, chemical interactions, and pressure
fluctuations).[28] Their sensation is too limited by the noise to solve the cue problem–the relevant
stimulus cannot overcome the noise magnitude if it passes through the senses (see the binding
problem). Fetuses need external help to stimulate their nervous system in choosing the relevant
sensory stimulus for grasping the perception of objects.[29] The Shared intentionality approach
proposes a plausible explanation of perception development in this earlier stage. Initially, Michael
Tomasello introduced the psychological construct of Shared intentionality, highlighting its
contribution to cognitive development from birth.[30] This primary interaction provides unaware
collaboration in mother-child dyads for environmental learning. Later, Igor Val Danilov developed this
notion, expanding it to the intrauterine period and clarifying the neurophysiological processes
underlying Shared intentionality.[31] According to the Shared intentionality approach, the mother
shares the essential sensory stimulus of the actual cognitive problem with the child.[32] By sharing
this stimulus, the mother provides a template for developing the young organism's nervous
system.[33]
Another crucial question in understanding the beginning of cognition is memory storage about the
relevant ecological dynamics by the naive nervous system (i.e., memorizing the ecological condition
of relevant sensory stimulus) at the molecular level – an engram. Evidence derived using optical
imaging, molecular-genetic and optogenetic techniques in conjunction with appropriate behavioural
analyses continues to offer support for the idea that changing the strength of connections between
neurons is one of the major mechanisms by which engrams are stored in the brain.[46]
Two (or more) possible mechanisms of cognition can involve both quantum effects[47] and
synchronization of brain structures due to electromagnetic interference.[48][27][31][33]
Serial position
The Serial-position effect is meant to test a theory of memory that states that when information is
given in a serial manner, we tend to remember information at the beginning of the sequence, called
the primacy effect, and information at the end of the sequence, called the recency effect.
Consequently, information given in the middle of the sequence is typically forgotten, or not recalled
as easily. This study predicts that the recency effect is stronger than the primacy effect, because the
information that is most recently learned is still in working memory when asked to be recalled.
Information that is learned first still has to go through a retrieval process. This experiment focuses
on human memory processes.[49]
Word superiority
The word superiority effect experiment presents a subject with a word, or a letter by itself, for a brief
period of time, i.e. 40 ms, and they are then asked to recall the letter that was in a particular location
in the word. In theory, the subject should be better able to correctly recall the letter when it was
presented in a word than when it was presented in isolation. This experiment focuses on human
speech and language.[50]
Brown–Peterson
In the Brown–Peterson cohomology experiment, participants are briefly presented with a trigram and
in one particular version of the experiment, they are then given a distractor task, asking them to
identify whether a sequence of words is in fact words, or non-words (due to being misspelled, etc.).
After the distractor task, they are asked to recall the trigram from before the distractor task. In
theory, the longer the distractor task, the harder it will be for participants to correctly recall the
trigram. This experiment focuses on human short-term memory.[51]
Memory span
During the memory span experiment, each subject is presented with a sequence of stimuli of the
same kind; words depicting objects, numbers, letters that sound similar, and letters that sound
dissimilar. After being presented with the stimuli, the subject is asked to recall the sequence of
stimuli that they were given in the exact order in which it was given. In one particular version of the
experiment, if the subject recalled a list correctly, the list length was increased by one for that type
of material, and vice versa if it was recalled incorrectly. The theory is that people have a memory
span of about seven items for numbers, the same for letters that sound dissimilar and short words.
The memory span is projected to be shorter with letters that sound similar and with longer
words.[52]
Visual search
In one version of the visual search experiment, a participant is presented with a window that displays
circles and squares scattered across it. The participant is to identify whether there is a green circle
on the window. In the featured search, the subject is presented with several trial windows that have
blue squares or circles and one green circle or no green circle in it at all. In the conjunctive search,
the subject is presented with trial windows that have blue circles or green squares and a present or
absent green circle whose presence the participant is asked to identify. What is expected is that in
the feature searches, reaction time, that is the time it takes for a participant to identify whether a
green circle is present or not, should not change as the number of distractors increases.
Conjunctive searches where the target is absent should have a longer reaction time than the
conjunctive searches where the target is present. The theory is that in feature searches, it is easy to
spot the target, or if it is absent, because of the difference in color between the target and the
distractors. In conjunctive searches where the target is absent, reaction time increases because the
subject has to look at each shape to determine whether it is the target or not because some of the
distractors if not all of them, are the same color as the target stimuli. Conjunctive searches where
the target is present take less time because if the target is found, the search between each shape
stops.[53]
Knowledge representation
The semantic network of knowledge representation systems have been studied in various
paradigms. One of the oldest paradigms is the leveling and sharpening of stories as they are
repeated from memory studied by Bartlett. The semantic differential used factor analysis to
determine the main meanings of words, finding that the ethical value of words is the first factor.
More controlled experiments examine the categorical relationships of words in free recall. The
hierarchical structure of words has been explicitly mapped in George Miller's WordNet. More
dynamic models of semantic networks have been created and tested with computational systems
such as neural networks, latent semantic analysis (LSA), Bayesian analysis, and multidimensional
factor analysis. The meanings of words are studied by all the disciplines of cognitive science.[54]
Metacognition
Writings on metacognition date back at least as far as two works by the Greek philosopher Aristotle
(384–322 BC): On the Soul and the Parva Naturalia.[62]
Improving cognition
Physical exercise
Aerobic and anaerobic exercise have been studied concerning cognitive improvement.[63] There
appear to be short-term increases in attention span, verbal and visual memory in some studies.
However, the effects are transient and diminish over time, after cessation of the physical activity.[64]
People with Parkinson's disease has also seen improved cognition while cycling, while pairing it with
other cognitive tasks.[65]
Dietary supplements
Exposing individuals with cognitive impairment (i.e. dementia) to daily activities designed to
stimulate thinking and memory in a social setting, seems to improve cognition. Although study
materials are small, and larger studies need to confirm the results, the effect of social cognitive
stimulation seems to be larger than the effects of some drug treatments.[70]
Other methods
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been shown to improve cognition in individuals
without dementia 1 month after treatment session compared to before treatment. The effect was
not significantly larger compared to placebo.[71] Computerized cognitive training, utilizing a
computer based training regime for different cognitive functions has been examined in a clinical
setting but no lasting effects has been shown.[72]
See also
Cognitive computing
Cognitive liberty
Cognitive musicology
Cognitive psychology
Cognitive science
Cognitivism
Comparative cognition
Embodied cognition
Cognitive shuffle
Nootropic
Outline of human intelligence – a list of traits, capacities, models, and research fields of human
intelligence, and more.
Outline of thought – a list that identifies many types of thoughts, types of thinking, aspects of
thought, related fields, and more.
Shared intentionality
References
1. Fludd, Robert. "De tripl. animae in corp. vision". Tract. I, sect. I, lib. X in Utriusque cosmi maioris
scilicet et minoris metaphysica, physica atqve technica historia, vol. II. p. 217.
2. "Cognition" (https://web.archive.org/web/20200715113427/https://www.lexico.com/definitio
n/cognition) . Lexico. Oxford University Press and Dictionary.com. Archived from the original
(https://www.lexico.com/definition/cognition) on July 15, 2020. Retrieved 6 May 2020.
5. Liddell HG, Scott R (1940). Jones HS, McKenzie R (eds.). "γιγνώσκω" (https://www.perseus.tuft
s.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.04.0057:entry=gignw/skw) . A Greek-English
Lexicon. Oxford: Clarendon Press – via Perseus Project.
6. Franchi S, Bianchini F (2011). "On The Historical Dynamics Of Cognitive Science: A View From
The Periphery.". The Search for a Theory of Cognition: Early Mechanisms and New Ideas.
Amsterdam: Rodopi. p. XIV.
7. Matlin M (2009). Cognition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 4.
8. Eddy MD. "The Cognitive Unity of Calvinist Pedagogy in Enlightenment Scotland" (https://www.
academia.edu/28249746) . Ábrahám Kovács (Ed.), Reformed Churches Working Unity in
Diversity: Global Historical, Theological and Ethical Perspectives (Budapest: l'Harmattan, 2016):
46–60.
9. Eddy MD (December 2017). "The politics of cognition: liberalism and the evolutionary origins of
Victorian education" (https://doi.org/10.1017%2FS0007087417000863) . British Journal for
the History of Science. 50 (4): 677–699. doi:10.1017/S0007087417000863 (https://doi.org/10.
1017%2FS0007087417000863) . PMID 29019300 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2901930
0) .
10. Fuchs AH, Milar KJ (2003). "Psychology as a science". Handbook of Psychology. 1 (The history
of psychology): 1–26. doi:10.1002/0471264385.wei0101 (https://doi.org/10.1002%2F0471264
385.wei0101) . ISBN 0471264385.
11. Zangwill OL (2004). The Oxford companion to the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
pp. 951–952.
12. Zangwill OL (2004). The Oxford companion to the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
p. 276.
13. Brink TL (2008). " "Memory." Unit 7". Psychology: A Student Friendly Approach. p. 126.
14. Madigan S, O'Hara R (1992). "Short-term memory at the turn of the century: Mary Whiton
Calkin's memory research". American Psychologist. 47 (2): 170–174. doi:10.1037/0003-
066X.47.2.170 (https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0003-066X.47.2.170) .
15. Matlin M (2009). Cognition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. p. 5.
17. Sternberg RJ, Sternberg K (2009). Cognitive Psychology (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Cengage Learning.
18. Blomberg O (2011). "Concepts of cognition for cognitive engineering". International Journal of
Aviation Psychology. 21 (1): 85–104. doi:10.1080/10508414.2011.537561 (https://doi.org/10.1
080%2F10508414.2011.537561) . S2CID 144876967 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/Corpus
ID:144876967) .
19. Paco Calvo; Antoni Gomila, eds. (2008). Handbook of cognitive science: an embodied approach.
Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. ISBN 978-0-08-091487-9. OCLC 318353781 (https://search.worl
dcat.org/oclc/318353781) .
21. Coren, Stanley, Lawrence M. Ward, and James T. Enns. 1999. Sensation and Perception (5th
ed.). Harcourt Brace. ISBN 978-0-470-00226-1. p. 9.
23. Pyszczynski, Tom; Greenberg, Jeff; Koole, Sander; Solomon, Sheldon (2010). "Experimental
Existential Psychology: Coping With the Facts of Life". In Fiske, Susan T.; Gilbert, Daniel T.;
Lindzey, Gardner (eds.). Handbook of Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
pp. socpsy001020. doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001020 (https://doi.org/10.1002%2F9
780470561119.socpsy001020) . ISBN 978-0-470-56111-9.
24. Zelazo, Philip David; Moscovitch, Morris; Thompson, Evan, eds. (2007). The Cambridge
Handbook of Consciousness. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816789 (https://doi.org/10.1017%2Fcbo
9780511816789) . ISBN 9780511816789.
26. Parke RD, Gauvain M (2009). Child Psychology: A Contemporary Viewpoint (7th ed.). Boston:
McGraw-Hill.
27. Val Danilov, Igor (2023). "Shared Intentionality Modulation at the Cell Level: Low-Frequency
Oscillations for Temporal Coordination in Bioengineering Systems" (https://www.lidsen.com/jo
urnals/neurobiology/neurobiology-07-04-185) . OBM Neurobiology. 7 (4): 1–17.
doi:10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2304185 (https://doi.org/10.21926%2Fobm.neurobiol.230418
5) . S2CID 263722179 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:263722179) .
28. Val Danilov, Igor (2022). "Smartphone in Detecting Developmental Disability in Infancy: A
Theoretical Approach to Shared Intentionality for Assessment Tool of Cognitive Decline and e-
Learning" (https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-10467-1_19) . Intelligent
Computing. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Vol. 508. pp. 305–315. doi:10.1007/978-
3-031-10467-1_19 (https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-031-10467-1_19) . ISBN 978-3-031-
10466-4.
29. Val Danilov, Igor; Mihailova, Sandra (2022). "A New Perspective on Assessing Cognition in
Children through Estimating Shared Intentionality" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article
s/PMC9036231) . Journal of Intelligence. 10 (2): 21. doi:10.3390/jintelligence10020021 (http
s://doi.org/10.3390%2Fjintelligence10020021) . ISSN 2079-3200 (https://search.worldcat.or
g/issn/2079-3200) . PMC 9036231 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC903623
1) . PMID 35466234 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35466234) .
31. Val Danilov I. (2023). "Theoretical Grounds of Shared Intentionality for Neuroscience in
Developing Bioengineering Systems". OBM Neurobiology 2023; 7(1): 156;
doi:10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2301156 (https://doi.org/10.21926%2Fobm.neurobiol.2301156)
32. Val Danilov Igor, Mihailova Sandra. (2021). "Neuronal Coherence Agent for Shared
Intentionality: A Hypothesis of Neurobiological Processes Occurring during Social Interaction".
OBM Neurobiology 2021;5(4):26; doi:10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2104113 (https://doi.org/10.219
26%2Fobm.neurobiol.2104113) .
33. Val Danilov, Igor (2023). "Low-Frequency Oscillations for Nonlocal Neuronal Coupling in Shared
Intentionality Before and After Birth: Toward the Origin of Perception" (https://www.lidsen.com/
journals/neurobiology/neurobiology-07-04-192) . OBM Neurobiology. 7 (4): 1–17.
doi:10.21926/obm.neurobiol.2304192 (https://doi.org/10.21926%2Fobm.neurobiol.230419
2) . S2CID 265002516 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:265002516) .
34. Castiello, U.; Becchio, C.; Zoia, S.; Nelini, C.; Sartori, L.; Blason, L.; D'Ottavio, G.; Bulgheroni, M.;
Gallese, V. (2010). "Wired to be social: the ontogeny of human interaction." PloS one, 5(10), p
.e13199.
35. Kisilevsky, B.C. (2016). "Fetal Auditory Processing: Implications for Language Development?
Fetal Development." Research on Brain and Behavior, Environmental In uences, and Emerging
Technologies,: 133–152.
36. Lee, G.Y.C.; Kisilevsky, B.S. (2014). "Fetuses respond to father's voice but prefer mother's voice
after birth." Developmental Psychobiology, 56: 1–11.
37. Hepper, P.G.; Scott, D.; Shahidullah, S. (1993). "Newborn and fetal response to maternal voice."
Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 11: 147–153.
38. Lecanuet, J.P.; Granier‐Deferre, C.; Jacquet, A.Y.; Capponi, I.; Ledru, L. (1993). "Prenatal
discrimination of a male and a female voice uttering the same sentence." Early development
and parenting, 2(4): 217–228.
39. Hepper P. (2015). "Behavior during the prenatal period: Adaptive for development and survival."
Child Development Perspectives, 9(1): 38–43. doi:10.1111/cdep.12104 (https://doi.org/10.111
1%2Fcdep.12104) .
40. Jardri, R.; Houfflin-Debarge, V.; Delion, P.; Pruvo, J-P.; Thomas, P.; Pins, D. (2012). "Assessing
fetal response to maternal speech using a noninvasive functional brain imaging technique."
International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 2012, 30: 159–161.
doi:10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2011.11.002 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.ijdevneu.2011.11.002) .
41. Liu J, Zhang R, Xie E, Lin Y, Chen D, Liu Y, et al. (August 2023). "Shared intentionality modulates
interpersonal neural synchronization at the establishment of communication system" (https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415255) . Communications Biology. 6 (1): 832.
doi:10.1038/s42003-023-05197-z (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs42003-023-05197-z) .
PMC 10415255 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10415255) .
PMID 37563301 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37563301) .
42. Painter DR, Kim JJ, Renton AI, Mattingley JB (June 2021). "Joint control of visually guided
actions involves concordant increases in behavioural and neural coupling" (https://www.ncbi.nl
m.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8242020) . Communications Biology. 4 (1): 816.
doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02319-3 (https://doi.org/10.1038%2Fs42003-021-02319-3) .
PMC 8242020 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8242020) . PMID 34188170
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34188170) .
43. Hu Y, Pan Y, Shi X, Cai Q, Li X, Cheng X (March 2018). "Inter-brain synchrony and cooperation
context in interactive decision making". Biological Psychology. 133: 54–62.
doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2017.12.005 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.biopsycho.2017.12.005) .
PMID 29292232 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29292232) . S2CID 46859640 (https://api.
semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:46859640) .
44. Fishburn FA, Murty VP, Hlutkowsky CO, MacGillivray CE, Bemis LM, Murphy ME, et al.
(September 2018). "Putting our heads together: interpersonal neural synchronization as a
biological mechanism for shared intentionality" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P
MC6123517) . Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience. 13 (8): 841–849.
doi:10.1093/scan/nsy060 (https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fscan%2Fnsy060) . PMC 6123517 (http
s://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6123517) . PMID 30060130 (https://pubmed.ncb
i.nlm.nih.gov/30060130) .
45. Szymanski C, Pesquita A, Brennan AA, Perdikis D, Enns JT, Brick TR, et al. (May 2017). "Teams
on the same wavelength perform better: Inter-brain phase synchronization constitutes a neural
substrate for social facilitation". NeuroImage. 152: 425–436.
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.013 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.neuroimage.2017.03.01
3) . hdl:11858/00-001M-0000-002D-059A-1 (https://hdl.handle.net/11858%2F00-001M-0000-
002D-059A-1) . PMID 28284802 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28284802) .
S2CID 3807834 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:3807834) .
46. Takeuchi, T; Duszkiewicz, A.J.; Morris, R.G. (2013). "The synaptic plasticity and memory
hypothesis: encoding, storage and persistence." Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013 Dec
2;369(1633):20130288. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0288 (https://doi.org/10.1098%2Frstb.2013.02
88) . PMID 24298167 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24298167) ; PMC PMC3843897 (htt
ps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMCPMC3843897/) .
47. Kerskens, C. M.; Pérez, D. L. (2022). "Experimental indications of non-classical brain functions."
Journal of Physics Communications, 6(10), 105001. doi:10.1088/2399-6528/ac94be
https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2399-6528/ac94be/meta (https://doi.org/10.1088%
2F2399-6528%2Fac94be+https%3A%2F%2Ffanyv88.com%3A443%2Fhttps%2Fiopscience.iop.org%2Farticle%2F10.1088%2F2399
-6528%2Fac94be%2Fmeta)
48. Hanslmayr, S.; Axmacher, N.; Inman, C. S. (2019). "Modulating human memory via entrainment
of brain oscillations." Trends in neurosciences, 42(7), 485–499. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2019.04.004
(https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.tins.2019.04.004)
49. Surprenant AM (May 2001). "Distinctiveness and serial position effects in tonal sequences" (htt
ps://doi.org/10.3758%2FBF03194434) . Perception & Psychophysics. 63 (4): 737–745.
doi:10.3758/BF03194434 (https://doi.org/10.3758%2FBF03194434) . PMID 11436742 (http
s://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11436742) .
50. Krueger LE (November 1992). "The word-superiority effect and phonological recoding" (https://
doi.org/10.3758%2FBF03202718) . Memory & Cognition. 20 (6): 685–694.
doi:10.3758/BF03202718 (https://doi.org/10.3758%2FBF03202718) . PMID 1435271 (https://
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1435271) .
51. Nairne J, Whiteman H, Kelley M (1999). "Short-term forgetting of order under conditions of
reduced interference" (https://web.archive.org/web/20220730173204/http://www1.psych.purd
ue.edu/~nairne/pdfs/32.pdf) (PDF). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A. 52: 241–
251. doi:10.1080/713755806 (https://doi.org/10.1080%2F713755806) . S2CID 15713857 (htt
ps://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15713857) . Archived from the original (http://www1.p
sych.purdue.edu/~nairne/pdfs/32.pdf) (PDF) on 2022-07-30. Retrieved 2018-01-09.
52. May CP, Hasher L, Kane MJ (September 1999). "The role of interference in memory span" (http
s://doi.org/10.3758%2FBF03198529) . Memory & Cognition. 27 (5): 759–767.
doi:10.3758/BF03198529 (https://doi.org/10.3758%2FBF03198529) . PMID 10540805 (http
s://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10540805) .
53. Wolfe J, Cave K, Franzel S (1989). "Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration
model for visual search". Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance. 15 (3): 419–433. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.551.1667 (https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewd
oc/summary?doi=10.1.1.551.1667) . doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419 (https://doi.org/10.103
7%2F0096-1523.15.3.419) . PMID 2527952 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2527952) .
54. Pinker S, Bloom P (December 1990). "Natural language and natural selection". Behavioral and
Brain Sciences. 13 (4): 707–727. doi:10.1017/S0140525X00081061 (https://doi.org/10.1017%
2FS0140525X00081061) . S2CID 6167614 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:616761
4) .
55. Metcalfe, J., & Shimamura, A. P. (1994). Metacognition: knowing about knowing. Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
56. Flavell, J.H. (1979). "Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitive-
development inquiry". American Psychologist. 34 (10): 906–911. doi:10.1037/0003-
066X.34.10.906 (https://doi.org/10.1037%2F0003-066X.34.10.906) .
57. Schraw, Gregory (1998). "Promoting general metacognitive awareness". Instructional Science.
26: 113–125. doi:10.1023/A:1003044231033 (https://doi.org/10.1023%2FA%3A10030442310
33) . S2CID 15715418 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15715418) .
58. Hartelt, T. & Martens, H. (2024). Influence of self-assessment and conditional metaconceptual
knowledge on students' self-regulation of intuitive and scientific conceptions of evolution.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(5), 1134–1180.
https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21938
59. Borkowski, J. G. (1992). "Metacognitive Theory: A Framework for Teaching Literacy, Writing,
and Math Skills" (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/002221949202500406) .
Journal of Learning Disabilities. 25 (4). Hammill Institute on Disabilities: 253–257.
doi:10.1177/002221949202500406 (https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002221949202500406) .
PMID 1573335 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1573335) . S2CID 10031331 (https://api.se
manticscholar.org/CorpusID:10031331) .
60. Gunstone, R. F. & Mitchell, I. I. (2005). Metacognition and conceptual change. In J. J. Mintzes,
J. H. Wandersee & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Teaching science for understanding: A human
constructivist view (pp. 133¬–163). Academic Press.
61. Dunlosky, J. & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.). Handbook of Metamemory and Memory. Psychology Press:
New York, 2008.
62. Colman, Andrew M. (2001). "metacognition" (https://books.google.com/books?id=UDnvBQAAQ
BAJ) . A Dictionary of Psychology. Oxford Paperback Reference (4 ed.). Oxford: Oxford
University Press (published 2015). p. 456. ISBN 9780199657681. Retrieved 17 May 2017.
"Writings on metacognition can be traced back at least as far as De Anima and the Parva
Naturalia of the Greek philosopher Aristotle (384-322 BC) [...]."
63. Sanders LM, Hortobágyi T, la Bastide-van Gemert S, van der Zee EA, van Heuvelen MJ (2019-
01-10). Regnaux JP (ed.). "Dose-response relationship between exercise and cognitive function
in older adults with and without cognitive impairment: A systematic review and meta-analysis"
(https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328108) . PLOS ONE. 14 (1): e0210036.
Bibcode:2019PLoSO..1410036S (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PLoSO..1410036S) .
doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210036 (https://doi.org/10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0210036) .
PMC 6328108 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6328108) . PMID 30629631
(https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30629631) .
64. Young J, Angevaren M, Rusted J, Tabet N, et al. (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive
Improvement Group) (April 2015). "Aerobic exercise to improve cognitive function in older
people without known cognitive impairment" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC
10554155) . The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015 (4): CD005381.
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005381.pub4 (https://doi.org/10.1002%2F14651858.CD005381.pub
4) . PMC 10554155 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10554155) .
PMID 25900537 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25900537) .
65. Hazamy, Audrey A.; Altmann, Lori J.P.; Stegemöller, Elizabeth; Bowers, Dawn; Lee, Hyo Keun;
Wilson, Jonathan; Okun, Michael S.; Hass, Chris J. (April 2017). "Improved cognition while
cycling in Parkinson's disease patients and healthy adults" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/
articles/PMC5346468) . Brain and Cognition. 113: 23–31. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2017.01.002 (h
ttps://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.bandc.2017.01.002) . PMC 5346468 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.go
v/pmc/articles/PMC5346468) . PMID 28088064 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2808806
4) .
66. Barfoot KL, May G, Lamport DJ, Ricketts J, Riddell PM, Williams CM (October 2019). "The
effects of acute wild blueberry supplementation on the cognition of 7–10-year-old
schoolchildren" (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6768899) . European
Journal of Nutrition. 58 (7): 2911–2920. doi:10.1007/s00394-018-1843-6 (https://doi.org/10.10
07%2Fs00394-018-1843-6) . PMC 6768899 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC
6768899) . PMID 30327868 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30327868) .
67. Thaung Zaw JJ, Howe PR, Wong RH (September 2017). "Does phytoestrogen supplementation
improve cognition in humans? A systematic review" (http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/nyas.1345
9) . Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1403 (1): 150–163.
Bibcode:2017NYASA1403..150T (https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017NYASA1403..150
T) . doi:10.1111/nyas.13459 (https://doi.org/10.1111%2Fnyas.13459) . PMID 28945939 (htt
ps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28945939) . S2CID 25280760 (https://api.semanticscholar.or
g/CorpusID:25280760) .
68. Sokolov AN, Pavlova MA, Klosterhalfen S, Enck P (December 2013). "Chocolate and the brain:
neurobiological impact of cocoa flavanols on cognition and behavior". Neuroscience and
Biobehavioral Reviews. 37 (10 Pt 2): 2445–2453. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.013 (https://
doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.neubiorev.2013.06.013) . PMID 23810791 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.
gov/23810791) . S2CID 17371625 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:17371625) .
69. Clement, Yuri N.; Onakpoya, Igho; Hung, Shao K.; Ernst, Edzard (March 2011). "Effects of herbal
and dietary supplements on cognition in menopause: A systematic review" (https://linkinghub.
elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378512210004536) . Maturitas. 68 (3): 256–263.
doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2010.12.005 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.maturitas.2010.12.005) .
PMID 21237589 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21237589) .
70. Woods B, Aguirre E, Spector AE, Orrell M, et al. (Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive
Improvement Group) (February 2012). "Cognitive stimulation to improve cognitive functioning
in people with dementia". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2): CD005562.
doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005562.pub2 (https://doi.org/10.1002%2F14651858.CD005562.pub
2) . PMID 22336813 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22336813) . S2CID 7086782 (https://
api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:7086782) .
71. Trung J, Hanganu A, Jobert S, Degroot C, Mejia-Constain B, Kibreab M, et al. (September 2019).
"Transcranial magnetic stimulation improves cognition over time in Parkinson's disease" (http
s://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1353802019302962) . Parkinsonism & Related
Disorders. 66: 3–8. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.07.006 (https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.parkreld
is.2019.07.006) . PMID 31300260 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31300260) .
S2CID 196350357 (https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:196350357) .
72. Gates NJ, Rutjes AW, Di Nisio M, Karim S, Chong LY, March E, et al. (Cochrane Dementia and
Cognitive Improvement Group) (February 2020). "Computerised cognitive training for 12 or
more weeks for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life" (https://
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7045394) . The Cochrane Database of Systematic
Reviews. 2020 (2): CD012277. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012277.pub3 (https://doi.org/10.100
2%2F14651858.CD012277.pub3) . PMC 7045394 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article
s/PMC7045394) . PMID 32104914 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32104914) .
Further reading
Coren S, Ward LM, Enns JT (1999). Sensation and Perception. Harcourt Brace. p. 9. ISBN 978-0-
470-00226-1.
Lycan WG, ed. (1999). Mind and Cognition: An Anthology (2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishing.
Stanovich, Keith (2009). What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought (https://
archive.org/details/whatintelligence00stan) . New Haven (CT): Yale University Press. ISBN 978-
0-300-12385-2.
External links
Emotional and Decision Making Lab, Carnegie Mellon, EDM Lab (https://web.archive.org/web/200
50405203028/http://computing.hss.cmu.edu/lernerlab/home.php)