Chapter 1
Chapter 1
Social psychology is the scientific study of how people’s thoughts, feelings, beliefs, intentions,
and goals are constructed within a social context by the actual or imagined interactions with
others.
It, therefore, looks at human behavior as influenced by other people and the conditions under
which social behavior and feelings occur. Baron, Byrne, and Suls (1989) define social
psychology as “the scientific field that seeks to understand the nature and causes of individual
behavior in social situations”
Topics examined in social psychology include the self-concept, social cognition, attribution
theory, social influence, group processes, prejudice and discrimination, interpersonal processes,
aggression, attitudes, and stereotypes.
Today, researchers and academics examine nearly every aspect of human existence through a
psychological lens. The American Psychological Association (APA) lists 15 subfields of
psychology, including clinical psychology, brain and cognitive psychology, developmental
psychology, and quantitative psychology.
Social psychology is the study of how individual or group behavior is influenced by the presence
and behavior of others.
The APA defines social psychology as “the study of how an individual’s thoughts, feelings, and
actions are affected” by other people, whether “actual, imagined, or symbolically represented.”
In essence, even just imagining another person watching you influences how you will process
information, behave, and react — and this is something social psychologists strive to understand.
Psychology as a field of scientific exploration remains relatively new, yet its importance as a
discipline is clear from the well-known names and concepts of early 20th-century research into
human behavior: Pavlov and his salivating dog, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, and Jung’s
archetypes of the unconscious.
These and other researchers wanted to uncover how human perceptions — of oneself, of others,
and of the world at large — influence behavior. As the field of psychology matured, researchers
began to focus on specialized aspects of the mind and behavior. This gave rise to subcategories
of psychology, including social psychology.
Social psychology has been a formal discipline since the turn of the 20th century. An early study
in 1898 of “social facilitation” by Indiana University psychology researcher Norman Triplett
sought to explain why bicycle racers seemed to exceed their solo performances when they
competed directly against others.
Later experiments sought to explain how and why certain artists and performers seemed to shine
in front of an audience, while others faltered. During World War II, researchers conducted
studies into the effects of propaganda on the behavior of entire populations.
Social Psychologist
Social psychology professionals, such as social psychologists, seek to understand the complex
interplay between social factors and human behavior. Specific areas of study include:
Social psychologists use a variety of research methods, including experiments, surveys, and
observations, to study human behavior in social contexts. They apply their findings to a wide
range of fields, including business, law, education, healthcare, and public policy, to help solve
social problems and improve people’s lives.
Those interested in what social psychology is should understand the difference between this field
and other academic disciplines. For example, social psychology and sociology are sometimes
confused. This is understandable, because both fields of study are broadly concerned with the
way human behavior shapes and is shaped by society.
The primary difference between the two is this: Social psychologists study individuals within a
group; sociologists study groups of people.
As early as 1924, when both fields of study were just beginning to reach academic maturity,
University of Missouri researcher Charles A. Ellwood sought to simplify the difference between
the two.
According to Ellwood: Sociology is “the science of the origin, development, structure, and
functioning of groups.”
Social psychology is “the study of the [individual psychological] origins involved in the
development, structure, and functioning of social groups.”
Examples of Social Psychology Topics of Today
Early social psychologists concerned themselves with internal and external influences on
individual behavior. British-born psychologist William McDougall’s 1908 publication, “An
Introduction to Social Psychology,” focused on human instinct as the driving force behind social
interactions.
More topics crowded under the social psychology umbrella with the 1920s work of brothers
Floyd Henry Allport and Gordon Willard Allport. The Allports are credited with applying
rigorous scientific theory and experimentation techniques to social psychology research.
This dynamic duo also conducted important studies into the development of attitudes, religious
beliefs, and many other topics.
What social psychology is focused on is studying changes over time. Social psychology research
has touched on nearly every facet of human personality in an attempt to understand the
psychological influence of perception and human interaction. Of the topics currently being
researched in social psychology, examples include:
Leadership — What personality traits define a leader? What is the role of a leader within
a group? How do leaders exercise influence on groups and individuals?
Aggression — How is aggressive behavior defined? What triggers habitual aggressive
behavior? What role does aggression play in self-preservation?
Social perception — How does an individual develop self-perception? How is self-
perception shaped by environmental factors? What is the difference between the
existential self and the categorical self?
Group behavior — What characteristics do groups share? How many people constitute a
group? What dictates the structure of a group? Why do individuals gravitate to a
particular group?
Nonverbal behavior — What nonlinguistic actions communicate thought or meaning?
How are nonverbal cues developed and interpreted? What emotions do facial expressions,
hand gestures, and other nonverbal behaviors communicate?
Conformity — What prompts individuals to change their perceptions to match that of a
group or another person? How does an individual decide to accept influence from another
or a group? What is the difference between outward conformity and internal conformity?
Prejudice — What causes someone to harbor prejudice against a member of a different
social group? What is the difference between prejudice and discrimination? How are
stereotypes used to build perceptions?
Principles
The scope of social psychology is vast, reflecting the myriad ways social factors intertwine with
individual cognition and behavior. Its principles and findings resonate in virtually every area of
human interaction, making it a vital field for understanding and improving the human
experience.
Example Theories
1. Allport (1920) – Social Facilitation
Allport introduced the notion that the presence of others (the social group) can facilitate
certain behavior. It was found that an audience would improve an actor’s performance in
well-learned/easy tasks but leads to a decrease in performance on newly learned/difficult
tasks due to social inhibition.
2. Bandura (1963) Social Learning Theory
Bandura introduced the notion that behavior in the social world could be modeled. Three
groups of children watched a video where an adult was aggressive towards a ‘bobo doll,’
and the adult was either just seen to be doing this, was rewarded by another adult for their
behavior, or was punished for it. Children who had seen the adult rewarded were found to
be more likely to copy such behavior.
3. Tajfel (1971) – Social Identity Theory
When divided into artificial (minimal) groups, prejudice results simply from the
awareness that there is an “out-group” (the other group).
When the boys were asked to allocate points to others (which might be converted into
rewards) who were either part of their own group or the out-group, they displayed a
strong in-group preference. That is, they allocated more points on the set task to boys
who they believed to be in the same group as themselves.
This can be accounted for by Tajfel & Turner’s social identity theory, which states that
individuals need to maintain a positive sense of personal and social identity: this is partly
achieved by emphasizing the desirability of one’s own group, focusing on distinctions
between other “lesser” groups.
Weiner was interested in the attributions made for experiences of success and failure and
introduced the idea that we look for explanations of behavior in the social world.
He believed that these were made based on three areas: locus, which could be internal or
external; stability, which is whether the cause is stable or changes over time: and
controllability.
Participants were told that they were taking part in a study on learning but always acted as the
teacher when they were then responsible for going over paired associate learning tasks. When the
learner (a stooge) got the answer wrong, they were told by a scientist that they had to deliver an
electric shock. This did not actually happen, although the participant was unaware of this as they
had themselves a sample (real!) shock at the start of the experiment. They were encouraged to
increase the voltage given after each incorrect answer up to a maximum voltage, and it was
found that all participants gave shocks up to 300v, with 65 percent reaching the highest level of
450v. It seems that obedience is most likely to occur in an unfamiliar environment and in the
presence of an authority figure, especially when covert pressure is put upon people to obey. It is
also possible that it occurs because the participant felt that someone other than themselves was
responsible for their actions.
Volunteers took part in a simulation where they were randomly assigned the role of a prisoner or
guard and taken to a converted university basement resembling a prison environment. There was
some basic loss of rights for the prisoners, who were unexpectedly arrested, and given a uniform
and an identification number (they were therefore deindividuated). The study showed that
conformity to social roles occurred as part of the social interaction, as both groups displayed
more negative emotions, and hostility and dehumanization became apparent. Prisoners became
passive, whilst the guards assumed an active, brutal, and dominant role. Although normative and
informational social influence played a role here, deindividuation/the loss of a sense of
identity seemed most likely to lead to conformity. Both this and Milgram’s study introduced the
notion of social influence and the ways in which this could be observed/tested. Research in social
psychology involves a systematic exploration of how individuals think, feel, and behave in social
contexts. To undertake a comprehensive study, researchers should adhere to a structured process.
Below are the key steps involved
2. Literature Review:
Conduct an exhaustive review of existing literature in the chosen field. This step provides a
comprehensive understanding of prior research, identifies gaps in knowledge, and informs the
development of hypotheses.
3. Formulate Hypotheses:
Based on insights from the literature review, construct clear and testable hypotheses. These
predictions articulate the expected relationships between variables and guide subsequent research
design.
4. Choose Research Design:
Select an appropriate research design aligned with the nature of the hypotheses. Experimental
designs involve manipulation, while correlational designs explore associations between variables
without manipulation.
5. Ethical Considerations:
Prioritize ethical considerations throughout the research process. This includes obtaining
informed consent from participants, protecting confidentiality, and ensuring their well-being
during and after the study.
6. Sampling:
Carefully choose a representative sample that reflects the population of interest. Consider
demographic factors to enhance the generalizability of findings.
7. Data Collection:
Employ suitable methods for data collection, such as surveys, experiments, observations, or
interviews. The chosen methods should align with the research design and facilitate the
measurement or manipulation of variables.
8. Variables:
Clearly define and operationalize variables, specifying how they will be measured or
manipulated. This precision enhances the reliability and validity of the study.
9. Data Analysis:
Choose appropriate statistical analyses to test the formulated hypotheses. Descriptive statistics
provide a summary, while inferential statistics assess relationships and differences.
10. Interpret Results:
- Thoroughly analyze and interpret the results of the statistical analyses. Discuss the implications
of findings in relation to the research question and existing literature, and acknowledge any
limitations.
11. Discussion and Conclusion:
- Summarize key findings, relate them back to the broader field of social psychology, and discuss
potential implications for theory and practical applications. Additionally, suggest avenues for
future research.
12. Prepare and Present:
- Compile the research into a comprehensive paper following the appropriate formatting
guidelines, such as the American Psychological Association (APA) style.
13. Peer Review:
- Submit the research paper to peer-reviewed journals for evaluation by experts in the field.
Address any feedback received and revise the manuscript accordingly.
14. Dissemination:
- Share the research findings through various channels, including conferences, publications, and
other relevant platforms, contributing to the broader scientific community.
Ethical Considerations:
1. Informed Consent:
Challenge: Ensuring that participants fully understand the nature and purpose of the study
and voluntarily agree to participate.
Solution: Provide clear, comprehensible information, allowing participants to ask
questions and obtain consent without coercion.
2. Deception:
Challenge: Balancing the need for accurate data with the ethical concerns of deceiving
participants.
Solution: Implement measures such as anonymizing data, using secure storage, and
clearly communicating confidentiality assurances.
4. Potential Harm:
Solution: Conduct a thorough risk assessment, provide appropriate support, and debrief
participants to address any negative effects.
5. Cultural Sensitivity:
6. Power Dynamics:
7. Voluntary Participation:
Challenge: Ensuring that participation is truly voluntary and free from undue pressure or
coercion.
Solution: Clearly communicate the voluntary nature of participation, provide an easy opt-
out option, and avoid offering incentives that could unduly influence participation.
Solution: Clearly document research procedures, make data and methodology accessible
when possible, and adhere to principles of openness and transparency in reporting.
Challenge: Managing conflicts of interest and dual roles, such as when researchers have
responsibilities as both scientists and practitioners.
Solution: Clearly delineate roles, disclose any potential conflicts of interest, and prioritize
the welfare of participants above other considerations.
Solution: Stay informed about ethical guidelines and emerging issues, regularly review
and update protocols, and seek ethical guidance from institutional review boards.
Researchers must stay vigilant and adaptable to address these challenges, ensuring that ethical
standards are maintained throughout the research process. Regular consultation with ethics
committees and adherence to established guidelines help researchers navigate these complexities
successfully.