Soil Tech Lab Manual
Soil Tech Lab Manual
1.1. Determination of pH
1.1.2. Principle: The concept of pH is derived from the ion product of water:
H2O = H+ + OH-
Kw = [H+][OH-] = 10-14
at 25 oC fpr pure water. When H+ and OH- ion activities are equal, we call it a neutral
reaction status with the negative logarithm value for either of the ions returning a
value of 7. Because the dissociated hydrogen ions affect pH, the type of acid present
is important for the interpretation of acidity. Acids are typically either strong or weak
acids depending upon their degree of dissociation. The relationship between the
dissociation constant, hydrogen ion activity and pH may be derived from the simply
law of mass action relationship:
HA
H K a or 2 pH pK a pHA
A
Note that at a concentration of 1 M, the pH is half of the pKa and hence pKa may be
directly estimated from measured pH in a molar concentration of acid. In soil, pH can
aid estimation of many ions such as Zn, Cu, B, Mn, Fe, and Mo.
= Eref + (2.303RT/F)pH
In soil solution, pH < 7.0 indicate acid soil and >7.0 alkaline soil.
Soil pH range:
Extremely acidic <4.5
Very strongly acidic 4.5-5.0
Strongly acidic 5.1-5.5
Medium acidic 5.6-6.0
Slightly acidic 6.1-6.5
Neutral 6.6-7.3
Mildly alkaline 7.4-8.0
Strongly alkaline 8.1-9.0
Very strongly alkaline >9.0
1.1.3. Procedure:
Adjust the pH meter by buffer (known pH solution). Generally, buffer solution
of pH 4.0, 7.0 and 9.2 are used.
Calibrate the pH meter according to temperature.
Weigh 10 g. soil.
Add 25 ml distilled water 1:2.5 (soil: water).
Mix well with a glass rod, and allow to stand for 30 mins.
Stir suspension every 10 mins. during this period.
After 1 hour, stir the suspension.
Put the combined electrode (after calibrating) in suspension and take the
reading after 30 secs.
1.1.4. Reference:
Indian Society of Soil Science (2002) Fundamentals of Soil Science.
Baruah, T. C., and Barthakur, H. P. (1997) A Textbook of Soil Analysis. Published by
Vikas Publishing House Private Limited.
Basak, R.K. (2006) Soil Testing & Recommendation. Published by Kalyani
Publishers.
Sarkar, D.K., & Haldar, A (2005) Physical and Chemical Methods of Soil Analysis.
Published by New Age International Publishers.
1.2. Determination of Electrical Conductivity
1.2.3. Procedure
Set the conductivity meter according to room temperature and then adjust the
EC of a standard solution from chart (generally, 0.01 or 0.1M KCl solution is
used).
Prepare a 1:2 (soil: water) suspension.
Stir the mixture with a glass rod occasionally for 30 min. or continuously for 5
min.
Immerse the conductivity cell into the suspension and take the reading.
1.2.5. Interpretation:
According to US Soil Salinity Staff (1954),
EC (dS/ m) Comment
> 4.0 Saline Soil
<4.0 Non-saline Soil
1.2.6. Reference:
Indian Society of Soil Science (2002) Fundamentals of Soil Science.
Baruah, T. C., and Barthakur, H. P. (1997) A Textbook of Soil Analysis. Published by
Vikas Publishing House Private Limited.
Basak, R.K. (2006) Soil Testing & Recommendation. Published by Kalyani
Publishers.
Sarkar, D.K., & Haldar, A (2005) Physical and Chemical Methods of Soil Analysis.
Published by New Age International Publishers.
2. Estimation of soil organic matter
2.1. Definition: Soil organic matter (SOM) is considered as the whole non-mineral
fraction of the soil solid. SOM contain two parts: Non-decomposed organic matter
and humas fraction.
2.2. Principle: There is no good scientific method to determine SOM. For its
determination we determine the soil organic carbon (SOC) and multiply with 1.724
(Von Bemmlen factor) as SOC is the main constituent part of SOM.
Reaction:
Oxidation of carbon:
K2Cr2O7 + 4H2SO4 K2SO4 + Cr2(SO4)3 + 4H2O + 3Ō (×2)
3C + 6 Ō 3CO2
Titration:
FeSO4(NH4)2SO4,6H2O FeSO4 + (NH4)2SO4 + 6H2O (×2)
2FeSO4 + H2SO4 + Ō Fe2(SO4)3 + H2O
2.3. Procedure:
2.4. Calculation
Weight of the soil =Wg
0.5 M (NH4)2SO4.FeSO4 solution for blank = B ml
0.5 M (NH4)2SO4.FeSO4 solution for samples = S ml
Organic C % Comment
< 0.50 Low
0.50-0.75 Medium
>0.75 High
2.6. Reference:
Indian Society of Soil Science (2002) Fundamentals of Soil Science.
Baruah, T. C., and Barthakur, H. P. (1997) A Textbook of Soil Analysis. Published by
Vikas Publishing House Private Limited.
Basak, R.K. (2006) Soil Testing & Recommendation. Published by Kalyani
Publishers.
Sarkar, D.K., & Haldar, A (2005) Physical and Chemical Methods of Soil Analysis.
Published by New Age International Publishers.
3. Estimation of Cation Exchange Capacity
3.1. Introduction: In soil, clay minerals and organic matter particles are charged
(dominantly negatively charged). There are two reasons of their charges.
a) Permanent charges due to isomorphous substitution (highest in 2: 1 clay minerals).
b) Non-permanent charges i.e. pH dependent charges (highest in organic matter).
For this charge, these soil particles have capacity to adsorb cations and there exchange
with soil solution cations. This property is called cation exchange capacity (CEC).
It is important as plants uptake maximum of its nutrients as cation form and plant
roots can only uptake cations from soil solution. This uptake results depletion of these
cations in soil solution, which is replenished by cations released from exchange sites
of soil particles. Actually, soil solution and exchange site cations remain in
equilibrium.
Previously CEC was expressed (unit) as meq/ 100 g. Recently the unit becomes cmol
(p+) /kg (though the conversion factor from previous to modern unit is 1).
The % of CEC obtained by basic cations is called percent base saturation (%BS).
Distillation method
3.2. Principle: In this method, CEC of soil is measured by leaching with neutral 1N
ammonium acetate (NH4OAc). This results saturation of exchange complex with NH4
ions. Then this adsorbed NH4 ions are determined by distillation of soil with magnesia
(MgO). The gas (NH3) evolved during this process is absorbed in known volume of
acid (taken excess amount). Then, the unreacted acid is back titrated with standard
alkali.
Reaction:
3.3. Procedure:
Preparation of reagents:
1 N NH4OAc, pH 7: Dilute 114 ml glacial acetic acid (99.5%) with water to a
volume of approximately 1 lt. Add 138 ml NH4OH and then water to a volume
of 1980 ml. Adjust pH by adding NH4OH or CH3COOH.
Determination of CEC:
Weigh exactly 10 g soil sample in 500 ml conical flask.
Add 50 ml NH4OAc solution to soil sample. Mix thoroughly and keep for
overnight (for NH4 saturation of exchange sites).
Transfer the solution onto a moist filter paper, seated inside a Buchner funnel
under suction.
Continue to leach the soil with NH4OAc solution (add 25 ml at a time). Add
more 150 ml to soil on filter paper for leaching.
To the soil on filter paper, add a pinch of NH4Cl crystal and leach with
alcohol. Continue the washing till the filtrate run free with chloride (test with
AgNO3).
After that, transfer the residue with filter paper to a 500 ml distillation flask.
Add 0.5 g MgO and 200-300 ml distilled water.
Connect the flask to the distillation apparatus.
Place a 250 ml beaker, containing 25 ml of 0.1 N H2SO4.
Start distillation.
NH3 evolved during the process can be confirmed by holding a litmus paper
(turned into red) at the end of distillation apparatus.
Back titrate excess acid with 0.1 N NaOH solution.
Run a blank.
3.4. Calculation
3.5. Reference
Indian Society of Soil Science (2002) Fundamentals of Soil Science.
Baruah, T. C., and Barthakur, H. P. (1997) A Textbook of Soil Analysis. Published by
Vikas Publishing House Private Limited.
Basak, R.K. (2006) Soil Testing & Recommendation. Published by Kalyani
Publishers.
Sarkar, D.K., & Haldar, A (2005) Physical and Chemical Methods of Soil Analysis.
Published by New Age International Publishers.
4. Determination of major available nutrients
4.1.2. Principle: A known weight of soil is treated with an excess of alkaline KMnO4,
which extracts easily oxidizable fraction of organic matter. Ammonia evolved is
absorbed in a known volume of standard acid, the excess of which is titrated against
standard alkali using methyl red as an indicator.
Reaction:
Alkaline Medium
2 KMnO4 + H2O 2 MnO2 + 2KOH + 3Ō
Oxidative Deamination
RCH.NH2COOH + Ō R.CO.COOH + NH3
Distillation
NH3 + H2O NH4OH
Absorption
2 NH4OH + H2SO4 (NH4)2SO4 + 2 H2O
4.1.3. Procedure:
Preparation of reagents:
0.32% KMnO4: Dissolve 3.2 g of KMnO4 in distilled water and make up the
volume to 1 lt.
2.5% NaOH: Dissolve 25 g of NaOH in distilled water and make up the
volume to 1 lt.
N/ 50 (0.02 N) H2SO4 and N/ 50 (0.02 N) NaOH solution.
Methyl red indicator (0.15%): Dissolve 0.15 g of methyl red power in
absolute alcohol (ethanol) and make up the volume to 100 ml.
4.1.4. Calculation:
Weight of soil taken: 20 g
Volume of N/ 50 H2SO4 taken: 25 ml
Volume of N/50 NaOH used (titrate value): X ml
Volume of N/50 acid used for NH3 absorption: (25 - X) ml
Now, I ml of N/50 H2SO4 = 0.02 meq. Of N = 0.28 mg N = 0.00028 g N
Therefore, % of available N = (25 - X) × 0.00028 × 100/20 = Y
Available N in soil (ppm) = Y × 100000 = Z
Available N in soil (kg/ ha) = Z × 2.24
4.1.5. Interpretation:
4.1.6. Reference:
Indian Society of Soil Science (2002) Fundamentals of Soil Science.
Baruah, T. C., and Barthakur, H. P. (1997) A Textbook of Soil Analysis. Published by
Vikas Publishing House Private Limited.
Basak, R.K. (2006) Soil Testing & Recommendation. Published by Kalyani
Publishers.
Sarkar, D.K., & Haldar, A (2005) Physical and Chemical Methods of Soil Analysis.
Published by New Age International Publishers.
4.2. Phosphorus (Available Phosphorus)
4.2.1. Introduction: Phosphorous (P), which is one of the primary plant nutrients,
present in soil in both organic and inorganic form. A considerable amount of it is
present in inorganic form (52-95%).
Forms of Soil P:
Soil P
Organic P Inorganic P
Plant can only absorb P in primary (H2PO4-) and secondary (HPO4=) orthophosphate
ions. In availability of these two types of orthophosphate ions are dependent on soil
properties mainly soil reaction. H2PO4- ions dominate in acidic range of pH (4.0-7.5)
while HPO4= ions dominate in alkaline range of pH (8.0-12.0). At pH 7.2, these two
ions have equal activity.
There are three standard worldwide-accepted soil P extraction and determination
methods.
Bray and Kurtz’s 1 (for acidic to near neutral soils).
Bray and Kurtz’s 2 (for tea, coffee, hilly rice soils).
Olsen’s Method (for neutral, alkaline and calcareous soils).
Reaction:
4.2.3.1. Procedure
Preparation of reagents:
NH4F 1 N: Dissolve 37 g of NH4F in distilled water and make up the volume
to 1 lt.
HCl 0.5N: Dilute 20.2 ml conc. HCl to a volume of 500 ml with distilled
water.
Extracting solution (0.03 N NH4F in 0.025 N HCl): Add 15 ml of 1 N NH4F
and 25 ml of 0.5 N HCl to 460 ml of distilled water.
Dickman and Bray’s reagent: Dissolve 15 g ammonium molybdate
[(NH4)6MO7O24, 4H2O], in 300 ml distill water, warm about 60 ºC and filter, if
necessary, after cooling. Add 342 ml conc. HCl and make up the volume to 1
lt.
Stannous chloride (SnCl2, 2H2O) solution: Dissolve 10 g SnCl2, 2H2O crystals
in 25 ml conc. HCl, (40% SnCl2 stock solution) and store in brown bottle.
Then dilute 0.5 ml of the stock solution to 66 ml with distilled water (prepare
this solution just before use).
Colorimetric estimation of P:
Take 5 ml of the soil extracts in 25 ml volumetric flasks.
Add 5 ml Dickman and Bray’s reagent to all test solutions (development of
yellow colour).
To avoid fluoride interference, add 7.5 ml 0.8 M boric acid.
Mix thoroughly the content of the flask with about 5 ml of distilled water,
washing the neck of the flash down, to remove the adhering ammonium
molybdate.
Finally add 1 ml of SnCl2 solution (development of blue colour) and make up
to the mark with distill water. Mix thoroughly.
Measure the %T by colorimeter after 10 min, using 660 nm red filter and
determine the conc. of P from standard curve. Must take the reading within 15
min as colour started to fade after 15-20 min. Plot the reading on standardized
graph and get the ppm value.
4.2.4.1. Calculation
Weight of soil taken: 5g
Volume of extractant added: 50 ml
First dilution: 10 times (50/ 5)
Volume of the extract taken for colour development: 5 ml
Final volume made: 25 ml
Second dilution: 5 times (25/ 5)
Total dilution: 10 × 5 = 50 times
Transmittance (%T) of test solution: T
Conc. of P as read from standard curve: A ppm
Available P in soil: A × 50 ppm = A × 50 × 2.24 kg/ha
Available P2O5 in soil: A × 50 × 2.24 × 2.29 kg/ha
Olsen’s Method
4.2.2.2. Principle: In this method, soil is shaken with 0.5 M NaHCO3, at pH 8.5, in 1:
20 ratio, for 30 min. with Darco-G 60 (activated charcoal). Darco-G 60 absorbs the
organic matter in the sample and therefore gives clear extract. P in this solution is then
treated with ammonium molybdate [(NH4)6MO7O24, 4H2O], resulting formation of
heteropoly complex phosphomolybdate (yellow colour). Then it is reduced by SnCl2
(blue colour). The intensity of blue colour is proportional to P conc. in solution.
NaHCO3 mainly extract P from Ca-P through precipitation of CaCO3. However, it
also extract P from Al-P and Fe-P.
Reaction:
Exchange Reaction:
Exchange Exchange
Complex Phosphate+ HCO3 Complex HCO3 + Phosphate
Chemical Reaction:
4.2.3..2. Procedure:
Preparation of reagents:
0.5 M NaHCO3: Dissolve 42.0 g of NaHCO3 in distilled water and make up
the volume to 950 ml approximately. Adjust the pH to 8.5 with dilute NaOH
solution and make up the volume to 1 lt.
Dickman and Bray’s reagent: Dissolve 15 g ammonium molybdate
[(NH4)6MO7O24, 4H2O], in 300 ml distill water, warm about 60 ºC and filter, if
necessary, after cooling. Add 400 ml 10N HCl and make up the volume to 1 lt.
Stannous chloride (SnCl2, 2H2O) solution: Dissolve 10 g SnCl2, 2H2O crystals
in 25 ml conc. HCl, (40% SnCl2 stock solution) and store in brown bottle.
Then dilute 0.5 ml of the stock solution to 66 ml with distilled water (prepare
this solution just before use).
Extraction:
Weigh 1 g soil in 100 ml conical flask.
Add a pinch of Darco-G powder.
Add 20 ml 0.5 M NaHCO3 solution.
Shake the flask for 30 min. in electric shaker.
Filter the suspension through Whatman 1.
Prepare a blank.
Colorimetric estimation of P:
Pipette out 5 ml extract in 25 ml volumetric flask.
Add 5 ml ammonium molybdate solution (development of yellow colour).
Shake the flask to avoid direct contact of SnCl2 with ammonium molybdate
solution.
Add 1 ml SnCl2 solution (development of blue colour) and make up volume.
Measure the %T by colorimeter after 10 min, using 660 nm red filter and
determine the conc. of P from standard curve. Must take the reading within 15
min as colour started to fade after 15-20 min. Plot the reading on standardized
graph and get the ppm value.
4.2.4.2. Calculation
Weight of soil taken: 5g
Volume of 0.5 M NaHCO3 solution added: 20 ml
First dilution: 20 times (20/ 1)
Volume of the extract taken: 5 ml
Final volume made: 25 ml
Second dilution: 5 times (25/ 5)
Total dilution: 20 × 5 = 100 times
Transmittance (%T) of test solution: T
Conc. of P as read from standard curve: A ppm
Available P in soil: A × 100 ppm = A × 100 × 2.24 kg/ha
Available P2O5 in soil: A × 100 × 2.24 × 2.29 kg/ha
4.2.5. Interpretation:
4.2.6. Reference:
Indian Society of Soil Science (2002) Fundamentals of Soil Science.
Baruah, T. C., and Barthakur, H. P. (1997) A Textbook of Soil Analysis. Published by
Vikas Publishing House Private Limited.
Basak, R.K. (2006) Soil Testing & Recommendation. Published by Kalyani
Publishers.
Sarkar, D.K., & Haldar, A (2005) Physical and Chemical Methods of Soil Analysis.
Published by New Age International Publishers.
4.3. Potassium
K NH4
K NH4
4.3.3. Procedure
Preparation of standards for K (minimum 5):
Prepare a bulk 1000 ppm K solution (dissolve 1000 mg K i.e. 1.908 g KCl
in 1 lt).
Then prepare K solution of different strength (5, 10, 15, 20 and 30 ppm)
from that bulk solution by dilution.
Preparation of reagents:
Neutral normal CH3COONH4 solution: Dissolve 77.09 g CH3COONH4 in
distilled water the make the volume to 1 lt. Use NH4OH or CH3COOH for
neutralization.
Standardization of flame photometer.
Weight 5 g soil in a 150 ml conical flask.
Add 25 ml of neutral normal CH3COONH4 solution.
Shake (in shaker for 5 min.).
Filter using Whatman 1.
Feed the filtrate into the atomizer of flame photometer.
Get the reading from flame photometer.
4.3.4. Interpretation:
4.3.5. Reference:
Indian Society of Soil Science (2002) Fundamentals of Soil Science.
Baruah, T. C., and Barthakur, H. P. (1997) A Textbook of Soil Analysis. Published by
Vikas Publishing House Private Limited.
Basak, R.K. (2006) Soil Testing & Recommendation. Published by Kalyani
Publishers.
Sarkar, D.K., & Haldar, A (2005) Physical and Chemical Methods of Soil Analysis.
Published by New Age International Publishers.
5. Determination of particle size distribution
5.1. Definition
The relative proportion of sand, silt and clay particles in soil is called soil texture. The
size of soil particles range over six orders of magnitude (Table 5.1) from boulders (1
m) to submicroscopic clays (<10-6 m).
The mineral fraction of soil is characterized with three major soil size classes: sand,
silt, and clay fractions with sizes 0.02-2.0 mm, 0.002-0.02 mm, and < 0.002 mm,
respectively. These fine earth fractions, also called as soil separates, have special
properties, which are associated with their large surface area. Mineral particle size
profoundly affects the physical, chemical and biological properties of soil including
soil aeration and drainage, soil water holding capacity, and habitable pore space in
soil. Based on the relative proportion of soil separates, twelve textural classes are
recognized the ranges for which are shown in Table 5.2.
5.2. Principle
The principle of sedimentation is used to determine percent composition of sand, silt,
and clay fraction in the laboratory. When fully dispersed and dilute suspension
containing spherical soil particles is allowed to settle, the particles fall freely in the
suspension with a terminal velocity (v). The expression for v may be derived by
equating the drag and buoyancy forces:
2 gr 2 ( p l )
v
9
where r is the particle radius, p is the particle density, l is the density of the liquid,
is the coefficient of viscosity, and g is the constant acceleration due to gravity. Once
the terminal velocity is reached, the time taken to travel a certain distance (usually top
10 cm of the suspension in a suspension cylinder of 1 L capacity) is calculated from
the diameter of particles of certain size. For example, it may be estimated that the time
taken for sand-sized particle to travel 10 cm of distance is about 5 minutes and that for
the silt-sized particle is about 5 hours. This information is utilized to sample
suspension from the top 10 cm of the soil suspension, oven dry the sample, and
estimate the mass of sample left after 5 minutes or 5 hours. The 5-minute sample
gives the mass of silt+clay fraction and the 5-hour sample gives the mass of clay
fraction. Knowing the initial mass of soil, one can then estimate the mass fraction of
different size fractions.
5.3. Procedure
The relative amounts of sand, soil, and clay in the < 2 mm fraction of the component
layer is then estimated using the principle outlined in the principle.
5.6. Remarks
Note that the sedimentation time is approximately 5 minutes and 5 hours. One should
use exact sedimentation time depending on the viscosity and density measurements in
the blank samples for the solution and soil combinations used.
5.7. Reference
Gee, G.W., Bauder, J.W., 1986. Particle size analysis. In: A. Klute (Editor), Methods
of soil analysis, Part 1, Agronomy Monograph No. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI,
pp. 383–412.Agronomy Monograph 9.
6. Estimation of single value soil physical constants
6.1. Definition
The following physical properties may be estimated using a ‘keen box’ (also, called as
Keen Raczkowski box):
a) apparent density
b) absolute specific gravity
c) maximum water holding capacity
d) percentage of pore space
e) volume expansion
A Keen box is a cylindrical brass core with a perforated screen fitted in the middle.
6.2. Principle
Simple mass volume relationships may be used to estimate the above physical
constants for soils.
6.3. Procedure
Weigh the Keen box fitted with a filter paper
Pack the box with air dry soil sample (ensure uniform packing by gently
tapping the box on its side)
Fill the box completely and level it using knife by removing extra soil at the
top of the box. Add extra soil and tap it to ensure that the box is full
Take the weight of box and air dry soil
Place the box on a tray containing water over-night. Water level in the tray
should be such that a portion of soil at the bottom is under water (about 0.5 cm
of water in the tray may be sufficient).
After equilibration, remove the box from the tray and wipe excess water from
the outside of the box
Weigh the box immediately
Scrap out expanded portion of the soil at the top of the box to a pre-weighed
moisture can
Weigh the Keen box with residual soil and the moisture box
Dry both the soils in an oven
6.4. Data Sheet
Symbol Item Value Units
W1 Weight of Keen box + filter paper g
W2 Weight of Keen box + filter paper + air dry soil g
W3 Weight of Keen box + filter paper + saturated soil g
W4 Weight of Keen box + filter paper + residual g
saturated soil
W5 Weight of Keen box + filter paper + residual soil g
after drying
W6 Weight of empty moisture can g
W7 Weight of moisture can + wet soil g
W8 Weight of moisture can + oven dry soil g
Symbol Item Value Units
z Gravimetric water content of air dry soil %
r Radius of the Keen box cm
d Height of Keen box above filter paper cm
6.6. Remarks
Carefully check the definitions for the apparent density and specific gravity and
explore their relationship with soil bulk density and particle density. Also, pay
attention to the units. Attention also is required on careful removal of soil after
saturating the Keen box and also the moisture retained in the filter paper.
6.7. Reference
Sarkar, D. and A. Haldar. 2005. Physical and Chemical Methods in Soil Analysis,
New Age International.
7. Determination of particle and bulk density of soil
7.1.2. Principle
Determination of particle density of soil requires that the volume of soil solids is
known or in other words, the total soil pore volume is known. The difference between
bulk volume and pore volume will yield the volume of soil solids. Generally, liquid
displacement following the Archimedes’ principle in a pycnometer (pycn meaning
dense) is applied to determine the volume of soil solids.
7.1.3. Procedure
Weigh the clean, dry specific gravity bottle.
Place about 10 g of oven dry soil in the bottle.
Weigh bottle with contents and record.
Fill bottle about half-full with distilled water and swirl well.
Take top off and heat bottle in water bath to 50-60° C for about 10 minutes.
De-air in vacuum for 10-15 minutes.
The purpose in swirling, heating and boiling is to remove all traces of
entrapped air. Failure to remove the air is the greatest source of error. Exercise
care in boiling so that the suspension does not boil over. If it boils over you
must start all over again!
Fill pycnometer to the top and replace the stopper carefully (water should
overflow through the capillary hole in the top) Wipe bottle dry.
Weigh the bottle and its contents.
Empty and clean the bottle.
Fill the bottle with water of known temperature and record that temperature.
Weigh the water-filled bottle
Clean, and store the bottle.
7.1.4. Data Sheet
Measurements
Symbol Item Value Units
(2 places behind decimal point)
W1 Bottle (empty) g
W2 Bottle + Soil g
W3 Bottle + Soil + Water g
W4 Bottle + Water (only) g
o
T Temperature of Water C
7.1.6. Remarks
Particle density is the average density of the soil particles present and is usually
expressed in grams per cubic centimeter (g cm-3). The suggested S.I. units are Mg m-3.
Note that the numerical value is the same in both unit systems.
7.1.7. Reference
7.2.1. Definition
Soil bulk density (b) is defined as the mass of oven dry soil (105° C) per unit bulk
volume of soil. Bulk volume includes pore space. Bulk density of the surface
horizons of cultivated soils varies widely in time and space, as it reflects the degree of
soil packing. The b of surface soil decreases with increasing aggregation and
increases with increasing compaction. The b decreases immediately after tillage due
to soil loosening (fragmentation), but generally increases over time, as compared to
untilled soil, due to loss of organic stabilizing materials. The b also increases with
increasing depth because of the increasing weight of overburden and decreasing
disturbance. Bulk densities for soil materials range from 0.5 g/cm3 for organic soils to
1.9 g/cm3 for sandy soils.
7.2.2. Principle
The procedures used to determine b can be grouped as follows: clod methods, core
methods, excavation methods and radiation methods (Chapter 2, Dane and Topp,
2002). In this Lab we will take "undisturbed" soil samples for determination of b by
the core method. In this method, a soil core of known volume is dried at 105 oC for
24 hours to get oven dry mass whose volume equals the volume of the core.
7.2.3. Procedure
Field Sampling: Establish a transect, with sampling locations spaced 1 m apart. Each
student is responsible for collecting one undisturbed soil cores (5 cm long by 5 cm in
diameter) according to the following procedure:
In the laboratory: Store cores at 4° C until they can be processed. Remove one 6 cm
long by 5.35 cm in diameter core from the refrigerator. Process this core as follows:
W3 Mass of core g
V Volume of core cm3
W4 Mass of water g
(W1 – W2)
7.2.6. Remarks
The customary unit for bulk density is g cm-3. The suggested unit based on SI unit
usage is Mg m-3. Note that the number remains unchanged.
7.2.7. Reference
1. Obtain data sheets from other students and prepare graphs showing b as a
function of distance along the transect. Discuss any trends that you observe.
2. A contractor needs 200 m3 of field moist topsoil for a construction site. When
loaded to capacity his trucks can carry 6,000 kg of field moist soil. Calculate
the number of truckloads needed to transport this soil from your sampling
location to the construction site.
4. Derive the following relationship between porosity (Vp/V) and bulk density:
Vp/V = 1 - b/p
where V is the bulk volume of soil, Vp is the volume of pores; given your
estimate of b and p this lab, calculate the porosity for your soil.
8.1. Definition
8.2. Principle
8.3. Procedure
8.6. Remarks
8.7. Reference
9. Evaluation of liquid and plastic limits
9.1. Definition
Liquid limit: boundary between the liquid and the plastic state, also called as upper
plastic limit. This is the water content above which a mixture of soil and water flows
as a viscous liquid and below which soil is plastic.
Plastic limit: boundary between the plastic and the semi-solid state. Also, called as
lower plastic limit. This is the water content at which the soil will start to crumble
when rolled into a thread under the palms of the hand.
Shrinkage limit: boundary between the semi-solid and the solid state. This is the
lower limit of the volume change at which there is no further decrease in volume
when wetted with water.
Knowing at which moisture content these limits occur for a given soil is a basic
geotechnical principle it is obvious why one would want to know at which moisture
content a soil reached it's liquid limit.
It is not appreciated as much in this country but in places like Hong Kong regular
liquid limit tests are carried out to determine whether hills will remain stable during
rain seasons in an effort to alleviate the problems of land slides.
9.2. Principle
The liquid, plastic and shrinkage limits apply to fine grained soils in which the water
content affects the physical properties, changing a clay soil from solid to liquid or
slurry. In 1911 A. Atterberg suggested the concept of boundaries to the four states in
which a soil may exist.
9.3. Procedure
Any coarse articles present need to be removed, by hand or by wet sieving
(coarse particles are defined as any particles retained on a 425 micron sieve).
Next a representative sample is required weighing around 200g. This sample
should be cut into small pieces using a knife or shredder and any coarse
particles removed with tweezers.
Then the sample is transferred to a flat glass plate, distilled water is added and
the soil and water are mixed thoroughly with two palette knives until the mass
becomes a thick homogenous paste. The paste is then transferred to an air
tight container for 24 hrs to allow the water time to penetrate the soil fully.
Use the grooving tool to divide the sample (in the cup) into two sections, do
this by running the grooving tool along the base of the cup from the hinge to
front edge of the cup in a continuous circular movement.
Turn the crank handle at a rate of approximately 2 rotations/s so that the cup is
lifted and dropped, counting the number of bumps.
Continue until the two parts of the sample come into contact at the bottom of
the groove along a distance of 13mm, measured with the end of the grooving
tool or with a rule.
Record the number of bumps required.
Add more water and repeat until the number of bumps for contact is the same
for two consecutive runs.
This must be repeated at least three more times with varying amounts of
distilled water added, proceed from the dryer to the wetter condition of the
soil the amount of water to be added shall be such that when the four or more
moisture contents are plotted they are distribnuted evenly over the range 10-50
bumps, each time the soil is removed from the cup for the addition of water
the cup and grooving tool must be thouroughly cleaned, if the soil is to be left
for any length of time it should be covered with a damp cloth to prevent it
drying out.
NOTE, if a number of tests are to be carried out they should be performed by
the same operator in an attempt to decrease the chance of operator error
creeping in.
Calculate the moisture content of each test sample, plot the relationship
between the moisture content and the corresponding number of bumps
recorded on a semi-logarithmic chart, with the percentage moisture content as
ordinates on the linear scale and the number of bumps on the logarithmic
scale.
Draw the line of best fit this is the flow curve. From the flow curve read off
the moisture content corresponding to 25 blows, to the first decimal place.
Express this moisture content to the nearest whole number and report it as the
liquid limit.
9.6. Remarks
9.7. Reference
10. Compactibility test
10.1. Definition
The Proctor test provides a means of determining the optimum moisture content at
which a given amount of energy will compact a soil to its densest state (the maximum
bulk density). This test was developed in 1932 by R.R. Proctor. Proctor's basic
procedure is widely accepted and has been adopted as the standard criterion for soil
compaction in engineering practice (ASTM, 1991). It is included here to demonstrate
the relationships that exist between the volume fractions of air, soil and water when
all three fractions are varied.
10.2. Principle
It should be recognized that the bulk density versus water content curve determined
by the Proctor test is only valid for the particular amount of energy applied. The
maximum bulk density increases and is attained at lower values of optimum moisture
content with increasing compactive effort. However, the optimum gravimetric water
content at which maximum bulk density occurs always approximately 80% of the
gravimetric water content at saturation (Hillel, 1980).
10.3. Procedure
Five points will be determined on the bulk density versus water content curve for a
Maury silt loam soil using standard Proctor molds and rammers. Each point will be
measured by a different group of students. The data thus obtained will be shared
among the groups.
1. Cylinder number
2. Cylinder mass g
5. Can number
6. Can mass g
10.6. Remarks
10.7. Reference
11. Determination of soil water contents
11.1. Definition
Water content is the amount of water present in soil and is expressed either on mass
Massof water
g
Massof soil
Massof water
v g b
Volumeof soil
where b is the soil bulk density. Mass of water can be determined by several
different methods. A summary of these methods are given below.
11.2. Principle
Thermo-gravimetric method
Convective oven drying method: In the gravimetric method, the water initially present
in a sample is determined by recording the loss of mass in response to heating of the
sample at 105 0C for 24 hours.
In Ground penetrating radar, radio frequency signals are generated and radiated in a
wide range of angles from an antenna into the ground and a separate antenna receives
both the transmitted and reflected signals. The reflected signal in this method is
correlated with the dielectric constant of the soil.
Capacitance device
In capacitance probe designed for soil water content measurements, the measurement
electrodes are placed in the soil in such a manner that the soil acts as the dielectric of
a capacitor in a capacitive-inductive resonant circuit.
Neutron Thermalization
Density/Water probe
Principle
The counter contains 10BF3 gas. On absorption of neutron, 10B isotope of B (boron)
emits particles. When the particles strike on the charged filaments of the counter,
electric impulses are counted.
To determine density, the cesium-137 source emits gamma radiation into the soil.
Some of the gamma radiation will pass through the soil and be detected by detector. A
soil of low density will give a higher count. A soil of high density will give a low
count for the same time, as the high density soil absorbs more gamma radiation.
Water calibration
M=Ar+B
M = water content
A, B are calibration coefficient
r = count ratio
A = (MH-ML)/(RH-RL)
11.3. Procedure
Gravimetric Sampling:
Weigh the empty moisture box.
Take the soil samples at desired depths.
Put it in moisture box and seal it.
Weigh the moisture box with wet soil.
Dry it for 24 hours at 105 0C temperature in oven.
Weigh it after oven heating.
Moisture/Density Probe:
Calibration of moisture density probe
Place the moisture/density probe above the access tube.
Switch on the depth probe by pressing start.
Insert the probe at desired depth (it should be equal or more than 30 cm from
ground surface).
Set units and time.
Press CALIB key.
Select MCALIB for moisture calibration.
Select Moisture calibration no. like MCAL 2-16 (As MCAL 1 is occupied for
factory calibration).
Display MCOEFF?.
Press STEP to get MSLFCAL (self calibration).
Press ENTER.
Display R2….
Feed value of R2 (As calculated manually by taking samples from that depth.
This can be fed in lab, right now feed any arbitrary value to continue for next
step).
Press ENTER.
Display C2….
Press START (Be 10 ft away after pressing START).
Display C2 count (Note this count).
Below the probe at lower depth.
Repeat the same procedure and note the second count.
Standard count
Place the gauge on the CPN name plate depression on the top of the case. (no
other radioactive source should be within 30 feet of gauge).
Switch on the depth probe by pressing start.
Press STD switch.
By pressing STEP key go to NEW STD?.
Press ENTER.
By Pressing STEP key come at DISP MCT (display moisture counts).
Press ENTER (It will start taking new standard counts and will display count
value against each count no. 1-32).
AVERAGE COUNT Value will display after completion.
11.6. Remarks
11.7. Reference
12. Evaluation of water retention characteristics of soil
12.1. Definition
A water retention curve is generated by plotting measured water contents as a function
of corresponding soil matric potentials. The relation is also called as matric potential
curve, water characteristic curve, water content-matric potential curve, and capillary
pressure-saturation relation. A WRC is a constitutive property of soil.
The water retentation curve depends on soil texture and soil structure. Organic matter
also affects the shape of the retentation curve.
12.2. Principle
Laboratory methods
Hanging water column
The hanging water column is a simple measurement technique for WRC wherein a
saturated soil column is kept in hydraulic contact with a porous plate of nonzero air
entry pressure. The bottom of the plate is connected to a hanging water column either
left open or form a U-tube as in a manometer. This column length may be varied to
achieve different target suctions. After soil gets equilibrated with the applied suction
its weight is taken to measure water contents gravimetrically. To determine a water
retentation curve is performed in a Buchner funnel, also referred to as a Haines
apparatus.
Tempe Pressure cell
In a pressure cell, the body of water under the porous plate is kept at about
atmospheric pressure, while a gas pressure, Pa > atmospheric pressure, is applied to
the soil sample. Total pressure head, h, is given by
h= ha + hm
When the wet soil sample is in contact with the wetted porous plate in a pressure cell
and the gas pressure is raised above atmospheric, water flows out of the sample
through the porous plate due to driving force caused by the increase in ha. As the soil
drains, hm and h decrease. Eventually, static equilibrium is established between the
soil water and the bulk water in the system below the porous plate.
Pressure plate extractor
Both the hanging water column and pressure cell method are limited to a minimum hm
value of about -850 cm of water column. The use of pressure plate apparatus avoids
this limitation. Principle is same as is for pressure cell.
12.3. Procedure
Sample preparation
For undisturbed soil samples
Take the few core boxes (5 to 8 cm in diameter, 1 to 6 cm in height) to collect
the soil samples.
Remove the weeds and level the ground surface.
Place the core on ground surface and hammer carefully (soil should not
compact).
Remove excess soil and transfer these cores to lab carefully.
Place the sample on the porous plate for saturation.
Let the water imbibe from the bottom of the soil sample.
Slowly raise the water level outside the sample ring up to near top of the
sample ring (this procedure may take from several hours to many days).
Once the wetting solution has wetted the surface of the soil, sample can be
assumed to be saturated
If undisturbed soil samples are to be stored for extended periods of time at
their field water content, add few drops of propylene oxide to each sample, cap
them, and store in a refrigerator to prevent bacterial growth.
Experimental steps
Take a porous plate with the desire bubbling pressure and saturate it
completely.
Drain most of the water from the space between the plate and the rubber sheet
and place the plate in the pressure chamber.
Connect the pressure tubing to the plate at one end and to the inside end of the
pressure chamber outlet at the other end.
Place the soil samples (saturated previously), on the top of the porous plate.
Close the pressure chamber and apply the desired pressure.
Water will start to flow of the pressure chamber (observe it from the water
level in the burette or glass beaker).
When outflow has ceased, disconnect the outflow tubing from the pressure
chamber.
Reduce the applied pressure to atmospheric and open the pressure chamber.
Remove the soil samples and take weight of moist samples.
Transfer the samples to tin cans and dry in oven for 24 hours at 1050C.
Calculate the volumetric water content.
Repeat this procedure for other pressure plates and get the moisture content
corresponding to each value of hm.
12.6. Remarks
12.7. Reference
13. Measurement of saturated hydraulic conductivity of soil
13.1. Definition
When the saturated hydraulic conductivity is measured via infiltration into initially
unsaturated soil, it is referred to field saturated hydraulic conductivity, Kfs. Air
interrupt in a porous media when the porous medium is saturated by infiltrating water,
especially during downward infiltration under ponded conditions. The water content
of a porous media at field saturation is consequently lower than at complete or true
saturation.
13.2. Principle
Double or Concentric- Ring Infiltrometer
The double ring infiltrometers are used for measuring field saturated hydraulic
conductivity, infiltration rate, and cumulative infiltration. A double-ring infiltrometer
consists of two cylinders pounded to ground to a depth of 10 to 20 cm. Two cylinders
are placed concentrically with the outer cylinder serving as a buffer zone. The inner
cylinder is about 10 to 20 cm in diameter by 10 to 20 cm long, while the buffer
cylinder is about 50 cm in diameter and the same length as selected for the measuring
cylinder. These cylinders should be thin-walled with sharp outside beveled cutting
edge at the base to minimize resistance and soil compaction or shattering during
cylinder insertion.
13.3. Procedure
Select the place and clean the weeds.
Insert the cylinders vertically.
Fix the hook gauge or some types of pointer at desired depth for ponding.
Pond a constant head of water inside the measuring cylinder.
Maintain the same ponding depth of water in buffer cylinder.
Measure the quantity of water needed to maintain the constant head with
respect to time (when the water surface in the cylinder drops to the pointer or
hook gauge level, water is manually added to bring the water surface back up
to a preset mark).
13.7. Reference
14. Measurement of infiltration rate
14.1. Definition
14.2. Principle
14.3. Procedure
14.6. Remarks
14.7. Reference
APPENDIX
This is for average, clean drinking water. It will vary from area to area.
17.0 1.0022
18.0 1.0024
19.0 1.0026
20.0 1.0028
21.0 1.0030
22.0 1.0033
23.0 1.0035
24.0 1.0037
25.0 1.0040
26.0 1.0043
The thermal coefficient of expansion of water is 0.00021 per 1° Celsius at 20° Celsius.
Density of Water (g/cm3) at Temperatures from 0°C (liquid state) to 30.9°C by 0.1°C inc.
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
0 0.999841 0.999847 0.999854 0.999860 0.999866 0.999872 0.999878 0.999884 0.999889 0.999895
1 0.999900 0.999905 0.999909 0.999914 0.999918 0.999923 0.999927 0.999930 0.999934 0.999938
2 0.999941 0.999944 0.999947 0.999950 0.999953 0.999955 0.999958 0.999960 0.999962 0.999964
3 0.999965 0.999967 0.999968 0.999969 0.999970 0.999971 0.999972 0.999972 0.999973 0.999973
4 0.999973 0.999973 0.999973 0.999972 0.999972 0.999972 0.999970 0.999969 0.999968 0.999966
5 0.999965 0.999963 0.999961 0.999959 0.999957 0.999955 0.999952 0.999950 0.999947 0.999944
6 0.999941 0.999938 0.999935 0.999931 0.999927 0.999924 0.999920 0.999916 0.999911 0.999907
7 0.999902 0.999898 0.999893 0.999888 0.999883 0.999877 0.999872 0.999866 0.999861 0.999855
8 0.999849 0.999843 0.999837 0.999830 0.999824 0.999817 0.999810 0.999803 0.999796 0.999789
9 0.999781 0.999774 0.999766 0.999758 0.999751 0.999742 0.999734 0.999726 0.999717 0.999709
10 0.999700 0.999691 0.999682 0.999673 0.999664 0.999654 0.999645 0.999635 0.999625 0.999615
11 0.999605 0.999595 0.999585 0.999574 0.999564 0.999553 0.999542 0.999531 0.999520 0.999509
12 0.999498 0.999486 0.999475 0.999463 0.999451 0.999439 0.999427 0.999415 0.999402 0.999390
13 0.999377 0.999364 0.999352 0.999339 0.999326 0.999312 0.999299 0.999285 0.999272 0.999258
14 0.999244 0.999230 0.999216 0.999202 0.999188 0.999173 0.999159 0.999144 0.999129 0.999114
15 0.999099 0.999084 0.999069 0.999054 0.999038 0.999023 0.999007 0.998991 0.998975 0.998959
16 0.998943 0.998926 0.998910 0.998893 0.998877 0.998860 0.998843 0.998826 0.998809 0.998792
17 0.998774 0.998757 0.998739 0.998722 0.998704 0.998686 0.998668 0.998650 0.998632 0.998613
18 0.998595 0.998576 0.998558 0.998539 0.998520 0.998501 0.998482 0.998463 0.998444 0.998424
19 0.998405 0.998385 0.998365 0.998345 0.998325 0.998305 0.998285 0.998265 0.998244 0.998224
20 0.998203 0.998183 0.998162 0.998141 0.998120 0.998099 0.998078 0.998056 0.998035 0.998013
21 0.997992 0.997970 0.997948 0.997926 0.997904 0.997882 0.997860 0.997837 0.997815 0.997792
22 0.997770 0.997747 0.997724 0.997701 0.997678 0.997655 0.997632 0.997608 0.997585 0.997561
23 0.997538 0.997514 0.997490 0.997466 0.997442 0.997418 0.997394 0.997369 0.997345 0.997320
24 0.997296 0.997271 0.997246 0.997221 0.997196 0.997171 0.997146 0.997120 0.997095 0.997069
25 0.997044 0.997018 0.996992 0.996967 0.996941 0.996914 0.996888 0.996862 0.996836 0.996809
26 0.996783 0.996756 0.996729 0.996703 0.996676 0.996649 0.996621 0.996594 0.996567 0.996540
27 0.996512 0.996485 0.996457 0.996429 0.996401 0.996373 0.996345 0.996317 0.996289 0.996261
28 0.996232 0.996204 0.996175 0.996147 0.996118 0.996089 0.996060 0.996031 0.996002 0.995973
29 0.995944 0.995914 0.995885 0.995855 0.995826 0.995796 0.995766 0.995736 0.995706 0.995676
30 0.995646 0.995616 0.995586 0.995555 0.995525 0.995494 0.995464 0.995433 0.995402 0.995371
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9