CMADD Volume 1
CMADD Volume 1
Hello Students,
Best wishes,
CS Somya Kataria
INDEX
S.NO TITTLE PAGE NO.
1.
Compliance Framework
1.1 – 1.32
2.
Documentation & Maintenance of Records
2.1 – 2.27
3.
Signing and Certification
3.1 – 3.26
4.
Legal Framework Governing Company Secretaries
4.1 – 4.21
5.
Values, Ethics and Professional Conduct
5.1 – 5.18
6.
Non-Compliances, Penalties and Adjudications
6.1 – 6.85
CS PROFESSIONAL
check the effectiveness of the controls within the organization and report that how the
organization is complying with the statutory requirements.
reflected in the organization’s structure and how it is managed and led toward
achieving goals.
Risk management is predicting and managing risks that could hinder the organization
from reliably achieving its objectives under uncertainty. Risk management is the set
of processes through which management identifies, analyzes, and, where necessary,
responds appropriately to risks that might adversely affect realization of the
organization’s business objectives. The response to risks typically depends on their
perceived gravity, and involves controlling, avoiding, accepting or transferring them to a
third party, whereas organizations routinely manage a wide range of risks (e.g.
technological risks, commercial/financial risks, information security risks etc.)
CASE STUDIES
Tata Motors has implemented a comprehensive GRC program that covers all aspects
of its operations, including legal compliance, risk management, and ethical practices.
The company has established a risk management framework that enables it to
identify and mitigate potential risks and ensure compliance with all applicable laws
and regulations.
Mahindra & Mahindra has implemented a GRC framework that encompasses all
aspects of its operations, including risk management, compliance, and ethical
practices. The company has established a risk management committee that oversees
the identification and mitigation of potential risks and ensures compliance with all
applicable laws and regulations.
Compliance Chart:
The Chart provides an overview of the applicable local, state, central and international
laws, regulations and standards relating to a business’ operations. The compliance chart
help business in meeting its compliance obligations towards the customers, regulators,
shareholders and employees because it provides a centralize compliance information of
the company on a single chart. The compliance chart also reflects the key activities and
compliance calendar which is to be followed and performed by a business unit to manage
its compliance risks.
Compliance Advisory:
Compliance Scorecard:
It is a tool to analyse the position of an organisation in compliance. A compliance
scorecard must be set up by organizations. The scorecard is not to be used as a mere
reporting but as a compliance management tool. It enables the reported compliance
breaches’ immediate remediation by informing a predefined responsible person in the
case of a violation. Thus, this employee can directly start remediation activities. The
tracking of the remediation activities’ status is again included into the scorecard.
COMPLIANCE CHART
the compliance chart is prepared by considering the following activities:
• Identification of compliances under applicable Laws, Rules and Regulations;
• Risk Assessment;
Compliance Risk
Mitigation
Compliance
Risk Assessment
Monitoring
Identification of Role of
Compliance
applicable law, rules Company Reporting
and regulations Secretary
Compliance Dashboard:
The compliance program must provide a single enterprise-wide dashboard for all users
to track and trend compliance events. All the auditors can use the dashboards to make
decisions on the compliance status of the organization.
A well-designed document management system shall ensure that the policies and
procedures are in conformity with the ever-changing rules and regulations is a critical
requirement. The creation, review, approval and release process of the policy documents
and SOPs (Standard Operating Procedures) should be carefully done.
When there are regulatory changes, various departments should be notified proactively
through “email based” collaboration. This process critically enables the organization to
dynamically change their policies and procedures in adherence to the revised rules and
regulations. While tracking a single regulation may be manually feasible, it becomes an
error-prone task to track all local, state, and central regulations including those taking
place across the globe.
Compliance Audit:
Audits are no more an annual activity and corporations offer appropriate audit
capabilities. Appropriate evidence of Compliance audits becomes critical in defending
compliance to regulations.
Quality Management:
two sides of the same coin. Therefore, it is critical to ensure that compliance management
solution offers support for enterprise-wide quality initiatives.
Compliance Training:
Sometimes lack of knowledge and in complete procedure lead to fines and penalties to
the director and officers of the company. The compliance office has to work closely with
the legal team of the organization to facilitate employee training.
The company must create plan to manage and report status of all compliance related
activities from a centralized data base. Automated updates should provide for up-to-the-
date status reporting.
Compliance Compliance
Identification Awareness
Compliance Compliance
Ownership Reporting
• Step 1:
Compliance Identification: The legal team has to identify the legislations applicable
to the company and identify the compliances that are required under each legislation
or rules and regulations made there under.
• Step 2:
• Step 3:
Compliance Awareness: Sometimes the compliances are handled by persons who are
not fully aware of the laws therefore, creating appropriate awareness amongst the
owners is very important. This could be done in the form of meetings/ trainings
explaining various compliances or some manual containing the details of compliances.
• Step 4:
Identification and
evaluation of compliance
obligations
Evaluating the
performance and
reporting the needs
The compliance chart covering above applicable laws must be kept up to date.
CASE STUDIES
In Re Siddarth Gupta (Appellant) v. The Delhi Golf Club Limited & Anr (Respondent)
[DEL] I.A. No. 19355/2015 in C.S (OS) No. 2805/2015, in this matter the Appellant
had acquired membership in the Delhi Golf Club Ltd after paying the requisite fees
and was enjoying the rights and privileges guaranteed to the members of the Club.
Meanwhile, the Appellant got to know that a resolution had been passed in the AGM
of the Club wherein the Appellant’s membership was cancelled. Consequently, the
Appellant filed a Petition against the said resolution in the Delhi High Court. The
honourable court observed that the membership of a person can be cancelled only
after following the related provisions of the Memorandum of Association and
Articles of Association of the Club and also the Principles of Natural justice. In this
scenario neither any notice was given to the appellant nor any opportunity of being heard
was provided to Appellant.
Depending on the nature of the business of the organisation, it is required to comply with
following laws and regulations:
• Labour Laws;
• Securities Laws;
• All other laws affecting the company concerned depending upon the type of
industry/activity.
CASE STUDIES
Non-Compliance of mandatory standards prescribed as per the Domestic
Pressure Cooker (Quality Control) Order, 2020
CCPA fines Cloudtail with Rs 1 Lakh for not complying with BIS standards.
The company has also been asked for the price reimbursement of 1,033 pressure
cookers to the consumers and is directed to submit the compliance report within
45 days.
The company was also directed to pay a penalty of Rs 100,000 for selling domestic
pressure cookers to consumers in violation of mandatory standards prescribed
under the QCO and violating the rights of consumers.
Legal Effect: Non compliances by the organisation can leads to various penalties, fines,
imprisonment, debarment, and seizing the products etc. against the organisation and its
officers.
Financial Effect: Low share prices of the securities of the organisation, financial losses
and low revenues and lowering the trust of the investors are some of its negative effects.
Business Effect: Shutdown of the factories can affect the business operations of the
organisation.
Reputational Effect: Loss in customers’ confidence in the brand of the organisation, bad
media or social discussion can tarnish the reputation of the organisation.
There are two types of risk assessments that can be performed by the company, i.e.,
In the High Level Risk Assessment, the risk identification procedures and its assessment
and the detailed risk assessment results are required as inputs for high level risk
assessment which are facilitated by representatives of Risk Management team. The
current and anticipated critical and high compliance risks must be included in the high
level risk assessment process. The outcome of the risk assessment is the high level risk
assessment report.
Reports from the detailed and high level risk assessments must include key compliance
risks, with existing and approved risk mitigation activities. Assessment Reports must be
discussed and signed off in accordance with the risk management procedure of the
company. Risk assessment techniques can be a combination of desk assessments,
interviews and/or workshops; however they should be aligned with risk management
standards of the company.
Aspects:
2. The ownership of the various compliances has to be described function wise and
individual wise. Clear description of primary and secondary ownership is also very
important. While the primary owner is mainly responsible for the compliance,
secondary owner (usually the supervisor of the primary owner) has to supervise the
compliance.
Ex: Secretarial Officer /Asst. Company Secretary may be primarily responsible and
Group Company Secretary’s responsibility is secondary. The role of the various level
of management for compliance ownership is illustrated as under:
COMPLIANCE REPORTING
Compliance reporting allows Management and the Compliance function to assess
whether Compliance Risks exceed the risk appetite of Company.
there can be two primary types of reporting: Cyclical Reporting and Incident Reporting.
CASE STUDY
ABC Limited, A BSE limited company has made following cyclical reporting
arrangements for compliance activities which includes:
Audit & Risk Management Committee: Quarterly reports on the performance of the
compliance programme will be submitted to the Audit and Risk Management
Committee. These reports will include a high-level summary of activities by all functions
undertaking significant compliance related activities.
Separate reports will also be submitted to the Audit and Risk Committee for major
noncompliance incidents or emerging compliance issues.
Annual Certifications: At the end of each financial year Responsible Officers will be
required to provide an assurance that to the best of their knowledge, the ABC Limited
has complied with the obligations relevant to their area of responsibility.
Each of the functional heads may collect and classify the relevant information from the
various units/ locations pertaining to their department and consolidate them in the form of a
report.
The report shall carry an affirmation from the functional heads that the said report has been
prepared based on the inputs received from the various units/offices and then list out the
specific compliances/ non-compliances, as already circulated to the functional heads.
Each of the functional heads will forward their respective compliance reports to the company
secretary/ managing director.
The company secretary would then brief the managing director. Upon receipt of suitable
inputs from the company secretary, the Managing Director would consolidate and present,
under his signature, a comprehensive compliance report to the Board for its information,
advice and noting.
The whole process of compliance reporting is contingent on the creation and implementation
of comprehensive legal Management Information System (MIS).
if changes are
required to improve
the effectiveness or
clarity of the plan
• Critical and high Compliance Risks, focusing on inherent and managed risk levels;
• Key Compliance Risk mitigation activities;
• Routine business transactions to which compliance obligations or risks are associated;
• The implementation/embedding of the Framework and all policies issued by the
corporate compliance department;
• Compliance with the laws, regulations and standards included in the chart, including
the company values; and
• The obligations that have been delegated to the compliance function (e.g. complaints
handling, privacy related obligations).
✓ Concise statements that capture the relevant internal and external compliance
obligations and the risks arising from those obligations;
✓ The business processes to which the compliance obligations are linked or on which
they have an impact
✓ The first line tracking (ongoing tracking as part of the normal course of business
activities), second line monitoring (health check performed by the Compliance
Function) and third line assurance (independent review performed by internal audit)
for efficiency and / or effectiveness of first- and second-line activities);
The following methodology may be adopted for accessing the compliance mechanism of
the company:
The basis of this assessment is to identify gaps between company’s current practices and
the regulatory requirements.
Program Design/Update: In this approach the review of the guideline documents that
outline the reporting structure, communications methods, and other key components of
the code of ethics and compliance program is accessed. This encompasses review of all
aspects of the compliance program, from grass root policies to structuring board
committees that oversee the program.
The process for addressing compliance issues and reporting concerns; and
Make it personal
Make it interesting
Make it understandable
Make it accesible
Make it ongoing
Concise statements that capture the relevant internal and external compliance
obligations and the risks arising from those obligations;
The business processes to which the compliance obligations are linked or on which
they have an impact;
Target audience (refresher for existing Employees, induction for new Employees, or
Adhoc when required);
COMPLIANCE AUDIT
As per CAG Auditing Standards, the Compliance audit is the independent assessment of
whether a given subject matter is in compliance with applicable authorities identified as
criteria. Compliance audits are carried out by assessing whether activities, financial
transactions and information comply in all material respects, with the authorities who
govern the audited entity. Compliance auditing may be concerned with:
• Regulatory - adherence of the subject matter to the formal criteria emanating from
relevant laws, regulations and agreements applicable to the entity.
• Go to the extra mile and lays the foundation for the control environment; Compliance
Framework.
• Real time status on the progress of pending litigation before the judicial/quasi-judicial
authority;
1. Nature of business(es).
Based on the above the Secretarial Auditor can constitute a broad idea about the desired
system and process to be adopted by a company.
The Directors’ Responsibility Statement is required under Section 134(5) of the Act to state
as under:
• In preparing the annual accounts, the applicable accounting standards and proper
explanations relating to material departures were followed.
• The directors had selected such accounting policies and applied them consistently and
made judgments and estimates that were reasonable and prudent to give a true and
fair view of the state of affairs of the Company at the end of the financial year and of
the profit and loss of the Company for that period.
• The directors had taken proper and sufficient care for the maintenance of adequate
accounting records in accordance with the Act’s provisions for safeguarding the
Company’s assets and for preventing and detecting fraud and other irregularities.
• The directors had prepared the annual accounts on a going concern basis.
• In the case of a listed company, the directors had laid down internal financial controls
to be followed by the Company and that such internal financial controls are adequate
and operating effectively.
• The directors had devised a proper system to ensure compliance with all applicable
laws and that such systems are adequate and operating effectively.
CASE LAW
the honourable Court held that director has breached fiduciary duty u/s 166 of
Companies Act, 2013 by initiating competing business as the director was involved in
the situation in which there was a direct interest that conflicted with company’s interest,
in order to gain advantage by director and its relatives. In case a Director violates the
duties prescribed in Section 166, the cause of action accrues in favour of Company.
If annual general meeting is not held for any year, the financial statements along with
the documents required to be attached under section 137(1) duly signed along with
the statement of facts and reasons for not holding the annual general meeting shall
be with the Registrar within 30 days of the last date before which the annual general
meeting should have been held in such manner, with such fees or additional fees as
may be prescribed.
The annual return filed by a listed company or a company having paid up share capital
of Rs. 10 Crores or more or turnover of Rs. 50 crores or more shall be certified by a
Company Secretary in Practice.
7. Notice of AGM.
8. Board Meetings.
Auditor shall be appointed for 5 years in the AGM. Company shall inform the auditor
concerned of its appointment and also file a notice of such appointment with the
Registrar within 15 days of the meeting in which the auditor is appointed in E-form
ADT-1.
In case of Specified IFSC Private Company- notice of auditor’s appointment shall be
filed with the Registrar within 30 days of the meeting in which the auditor is appointed.
Illustration:
What if the company secretary is not appointed in ABC Pvt. Ltd., where required under
Companies Act, 2013?
Solution:
Such company shall be liable to a penalty of five lakh rupees and every director and key
managerial personnel of the company who is in default shall be liable to a penalty of
fifty thousand rupees and where the default is a continuing one, with a further penalty
of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which such default continues
but not exceeding five lakh rupees.
CASE LAW
In this matter of Economy Hotels India Services (Appellant) Private Limited Vs. Registrar
of Companies & Anr.(Respondent) (NCLAT) Company Appeal (AT) No. 97 of 2020, the
Appellant Company had filed a petition under Section 66 of the Companies Act praying
for confirming the reduction of share capital against the NCLT order for rejection of
application for reduction of share capital because in the extract of the minutes
submitted to NCLT, the case is, it was written that the ‘unanimous ordinary resolution’
required for reduction has been obtained. The case is it was a mere typographical error
in the minutes characterising the ‘special resolution’ as ‘unanimous ordinary resolution’
and the Appellant had filed the special resolution with ROC and fulfilled all the statutory
requirements prescribed in the Companies Act, 2013.
The honourable NCLAT observed that ‘Reduction of Capital’ under Section 66 of the
Companies Act, 2013 is a ‘Domestic Affair’ of a particular Company in which, ordinarily,
a Tribunal will not interfere because of the reason that it is a ‘majority decision’ which
prevails. As the Appellant has admitted its typographical error in the extract of the
Minutes of the Meeting characterizing the ‘special resolution’ as ‘unanimous ordinary
resolution’ and also taking into consideration of the fact that the Appellant had filed
the special resolution with ROC, which satisfies the requirement of Section 66 of the
Companies Act, 2013. NCLAT allowed the Appeal, thereby confirming the reduction of
share capital of the Appellant Company.
27.01.2016 the Registrar of Companies, West Bengal sent show cause notice on the
ground that he was the Director of more than 20.Companies at once. The Respondent
admitted the guilty and sent representation to the Registrar with a request to
compound the offence under Section.441(1) of the Companies Act, 2013. After hearing
the parties the NCLT Kolkata Bench (Tribunal) allowed the compounding application
subject to payment of compounding. Fees of Rs. 50,000/-.
Being aggrieved with this order ROC has filed this Appeal saying that the minimum fine
prescribed for the offence is more than 50,000,. Hence the compounding fees of 50,000
is not appropriate. The issue for consideration is, whether Tribunal can impose the
compounding fees, less than minimum fine prescribed for the offence under the Act.
The NCLAT held that the NCLT, Kolkata Bench has failed to notice the minimum fine
prescribed under Section 165 of the Companies Act, 2013 which was applicable at
relevant time. Accordingly, NCLAT imposed minimum fine at the rate of 5000 rupees
for every day for the period 01.04.2015 to 21.02.2016 i.e. 272 days, which came to Rs.
13,60,000. Further, the court held that the compounding fees has to be more than or
equal to the minimum fine prescribed under the Act.
Illustration:
NSE has introduced NEAPS (NSE Electronic Application Processing System) which is a
web-based application facilitates online filing of SEBI Disclosures, Clarifications and
Compliance Filings, Corporate Governance Report, the Shareholding Pattern by
companies, Results and other disclosures.
• Risk remedy
• Solving Technical issues
• Corporate Governance.
• Risk in human errors reduced: It generates the human error reports quickly with
detection of compliance failures.
CASE STUDIES
Project Eagle: Infosys Regulatory Compliance Program
Any changes in applicable regulations are also being updated on the tool on a
regular basis, in collaboration with external consultant. An inter-functional team
of designated users and checkers oversee implementation and its functioning.
Further, respective Functional Heads also supervise and certify continued adherence of
applicable regulations as well as any risk of non-compliance with mitigation plan to the
Board on a quarterly basis. Infosys culture of compliance and the compliance tracking
tools are reviewed by Audit Committee of the Board and Management at regular
intervals. It further undergoes independent assessment internally and with the help of
external auditors.
Record means:
A record is a matter of evidence about the past. Not every record is a document. For
instance, a taped conversation between two persons may be used as a record to conclude
that they were framing a conspiracy. Some examples of records may include final reports,
emails confirming actions or decisions, photographs, spreadsheets, business contracts,
etc.
2- At the next level of the documentation, it is the duty of the CS to ensure the
confidentiality of the documents and check whether or not the document requires
any further action,
3- To check whether it is consistent with prior records (in both substance and form),
or if it conflicts with corporate policies.
CASE LAW
provisions of section 88 of the Companies Act, 2013. As per the provisions of the
Companies Act, 2013, every company limited by shares shall from the date of its
registration, maintain a register of its members in form no. MGT-1.
During the course of enquiry pursuant to section 206 of the Companies Act 2013, the
inspection officer persuaded the statutory registers maintained by the company and
noticed that the register Form No. MGT-1 maintained by the company is incomplete.
Taking on account of default, the adjudication officer gave reasonable opportunity to
being heard to the company and every officer in default by way of giving personal
hearing notice.
Consequently, the Adjudicating Officer, after having considered the facts and
circumstances of the case and also the submissions made by the company and its
director during the personal hearing, decided to impose the penalty on the company
and its directors for non-compliance of section 88 of the Companies Act, 2013.
CASE LAW
In the matter of Welspun Project Ltd. V. National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad
Bench (T.P. NO. 149/621A/ NCLT/AHM/2016), it was observed that the Register of
directors’ shareholding of the petitioner company did not disclose the complete
particulars as required under section 307 of the Companies Act, 1956 (now section 170
of the Companies Act, 2013). ROC’s report observed that this violation was committed
for about 8 years. Petitioners admitted such violation and filed petition under section
621A (now section 441) for compounding violation. The offence committed was
compounded on payment of fine.
PURPOSE OF DOCUMENTATION
Client Service: Documentation is a tool for professionals to serve better to their clients
in a timely and effective manner.
Legal Requirement: Professionals are required to make and keep records of their
professional work in accordance with practice standards.
CASE LAW
In the matter of M/s Indiabulls Real Estate Limited, the Registrar of Companies, NCT of
Delhi & Haryana, has passed an Adjudication order for non-compliance of the
provisions of sub-section (10) of section 118 (mandatory observance of Secretarial
Standards with respect of general and board meetings) of the Companies Act 2013 read
with Secretarial Standards – 1 & 2.
As per section 206(5) of the Companies Act 2013, the Central Government carried out
the inspection of the books of accounts of the company and after going through the
records / documents of the company, the inspector, upon completion of the inspection
observed that the company has not complied with the provisions of section 118 (10)
read with Secretarial Standards. The inspector while submitting the report pointed out
that the company has not serially numbered their “Attendance Register” of board
meetings and other meetings and also the “Attendance Register” maintained in loose-
leaf form, not bound periodically, which is not in compliance with section 118 of the
Companies Act 2013 read with Secretarial Standards issued by the Institute of Company
Secretaries of India.
The Registrar of Companies, based on the report submitted by the inspector, issued a
show cause notice to the company. The company in a reply to show cause notice stated
that the company and its directors / officers accept that there has been an inadvertent
mistakes and these have been rectified subsequent to the issue of the show cause
notice. The company stated that there was no deliberate intention and no mens-rea
with read to the offences and therefore the company, its directors / officers deserve to
be excused.
The Registrar of Companies / Adjudicating Officer came to the conclusion after going
through the application and also based on the oral and written submission made by
the company at the time of the personal hearing and imposed penalty on the company
and its officers.
Do’s Don’t’s
Do add the reference notes (if possible) to Don’t make the data confusing, vague and
provide the context unreadable
• Ease of use: It’s very easy to locate and share electronic documents through
Computers aid searching now a days the process of filing doesn’t exist anymore.
• Labor savings: The labor required to locate, manage and dispose of electronic
documents is almost nil and minimum.
• Version tracking: In case of the version tracking it is very easy with electronic
documents, making it easy to see who has made changes to a document, when
they made those and what the document looked like before the change.
CASE LAW
The Supreme Court observed that the major premise of Shafhi Mohammad (supra) that
the certificate under section 65-B(4) cannot be secured by persons who are not in
possession of an electronic device is incorrect. An application can always be made to a
Judge for production of such a certificate from the requisite person under Section
65B(4) in cases in which such person refuses to give it.
• Reliability
• Portability
Rule 27 provides that every listed company or a company having not less than one
thousand shareholders, debenture holders and other security holders, may maintain its
records in electronic form.
The records in electronic form shall be maintained in such manner as the Board of
directors of the company may think fit, provided that -
a) the records are maintained in the same formats and in accordance with all other
requirements provided in the Act or the rules made there under;
b) the information as required under the provisions of the Act or the rules made there
under should be adequately recorded for future reference;
c) the records must be capable of being readable, retrievable and reproducible in printed
form;
d) the records are capable of being dated and signed digitally wherever it is required
under the provisions of the Act or the rules made there under;
e) the records, once dated and signed digitally, shall not be capable of being edited or
altered;
f) the records shall be capable of being updated, according to the provisions of the Act
or the rules made there under, and the date of updating shall be capable of being
recorded on every updating.
(2) The person who is responsible for the maintenance and security of electronic
records shall-
b) ensure against loss of the records as a result of damage to, or failure of the media
on which the records are maintained;
c) ensure that the signatory of electronic records does not repudiate the signed
record as not genuine;
d) ensure that computer systems, software and hardware are adequately secured and
validated to ensure their accuracy, reliability and consistent intended performance;
e) ensure that the computer systems can discern invalid and altered records;
f) ensure that records are accurate, accessible, and capable of being reproduced for
reference later;
g) ensure that the records are at all times capable of being retrieved to a readable
and printable form;
h) ensure that records are kept in a non-rewriteable and non-erasable format like pdf.
version or some other version which cannot be altered or tampered;
i) ensure that at least one backup, taken at a periodicity of not exceeding one day,
are kept of the updated records kept in electronic form, every backup is
authenticated and dated and such backups shall be securely kept at such places as
may be decided by the Board;
j) limit the access to the records to the managing director, company secretary or any
other director or officer or persons performing work of the company as may be
authorized by the Board in this behalf;
l) arrange and index the records in a way that permits easy location, access and
retrieval of any particular record; and
CASE LAW
In the matter of M/s. Michelin India Pvt Ltd, the Registrar of Companies, Tamil Nadu on
18th October, 2022, has passed an adjudication order by imposing of penalty for violation
of provisions of section 134(3)(f ) of the Companies Act, 2013. Pursuant to Section 134(3)(f)
of the Companies Act, 20l3, there shall be attached to statements laid before a company
in general meeting, a report by its Board of Directors, Which shall include explanations or
comments by the Board on every qualification, reservation or adverse remark or disclaimer
made by the auditor in auditors report or by company secretary in his secretarial audit
report.
The Regional Director, Southern Region Chennai has observed that while examining, that
the statutory Auditor’s in their audit report have reported deficiencies in the internal
financial control and they were unable to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence.
It is clearly evident from the said statement that the company did not have proper internal
financial control and also did not maintain appropriate records. Further, auditors report
also mentioned non-maintenance of back up of books of accounts maintained in
electronic mode in servers physically located in India. However, the Board of Director in
their Boards report have not offered any explanation for the observations of auditors.
The Regional Director, Ministry of Corporate Affairs, had issued directions to take action
against the company, every director and key managerial personnel of the company who
is in default and to penalize the defaulter(s) ibid adjudication order.
PHYSICAL REPOSITORY
The term Physical repository refers to a central place where data is stored and maintained.
A repository can be a place where multiple databases or files are located for distribution
over a network, or a repository can be a location that is directly accessible to the user
without having to travel across a network.
• Be persistent and not tied to anything that changes over time or location;
• Use a period followed by a file extension (for example, .tif, .jpg, .gif, .pdf, .wav,
.mpg);
• Use lowercase letters. However, when a name has more than one word, start
each word with an uppercase letter for example,
“File_Name_Convention_001.doc”;
• Use numbers and/or letters but not characters such as symbols or spaces that
could cause complications across operating platforms;
The ten basic rules that could serve as a general guideline in structuring folder and file
naming are:
4 Use the Smith-John_AIG Smith John AIG Spaces are poor visual
hyphen (-) to _7654-6_POLI- 7654 6 POLICY delimiters and some
delimit words CY_2009-09-15. 2009 09 15.pdf search tools do not
within an pdf || WhitePaper_ || White Paper work with spaces. The
element or Structured File Structured file hyphen (-) is a
capitalize the Naming Strategy. naming common word
first letter of Doc strategy.doc delimiter. Alternatively,
each word capitalizing the words
within an within an element is an
element. efficient method of
differentiating words
but is harder to read.
5 Elements FY2009_Acme- TrialBal _ In general the
should be Corp _Q3_ Q3_20091015_ elements should be
ordered from TrialBal_20091015_ Acme-Corp_V02_ ordered logically, in
general to V02.xls || FY2009.xls || the same sequence
specific detail Production_ Paint-Shop_775-2_ that you would
of importance Paint-Shop_ WorkOrder_ normally search for a
as much as WorkOrder_775-2. Production.xls targeted file.
possible. Xls
6 The order of RFQ375_Cables- RFQ375_Cables- To ensure that files are
importance Unlimited Unlimited _ sorted in proper
rule holds true _BID_20091015- BID_10152009- chronological order
when elements 1655.pdf || 2009- 1655. pdf || Nov- the most significant
include date 11-20_AMATProj_ 20-2009_ date and time
and time Phase1_Report.doc AMATProj_ components should
stamps. Dates Phase1_ appear first followed
should be Report.doc with the least
ordered: YEAR, significant
MONTH, DAY. components.
(e.g.
YYYYMMDD, Y
YYYMMDD
,
YYYYMM).Time
should be
ordered:
HOUR,
MINUTES,
SECONDS
(HHMMSS).
7 Personal Tate-Peter_SunLife Peter-Tate_SunLife The family name is the
names within _1-7566-2_ _1-7566-2_POLI- standard reference for
an element POLICY_10YrTerm. CY_10 Year retrieving records.
should have pdf || SmithJ_ Term.pdf Having the family
family name ID3567_ADMIN_ || JSmith_ ID3567_ name first will ensure
first followed WageReview.xls ADMIN_Wage that files are sorted in
by first names Review.xls proper alphabetical
or initials order.
8 Abbreviate the RevQC _QST_2009- Minister of Abbreviating helps
content of Q2.xls || MCIM_ Revenue Quebec create concise file
elements 27643 _POD. doc _Quebec- Sales- names that are easier
whenever Tax_2009- to read and recognize.
possible. 2ndQuarter.
xls || MultiCIM-
Technologies-
Inc_27643_Proof-
Of-Delivery.pdf
9 An element for MCIM_Proposal_ MCIM_Proposal_9. The “V” helps denote
version V09.doc || eXadox_ doc || eXadox_ that the element
control UserManual_V1- UserManual_ pertains to a version
should start 02. doc V2FinalDraft.doc number. A minimum of
with V 2 digits with a leading
followed by at zero is required to
least ensure that search
2 digits and results are properly
should be sorted. The intent is to
1-Keeping together
The records must be kept together according to the department / Section responsible for
their creation or accumulation, in the original order established at the time of their
creation. This gives them their ‘evidential’ nature and distinguishes them from other kinds
of information.
Every record pass through three main phases, i.e. current phase, semi-current phase and
non-current phase. In the current phase, they are used regularly in the conduct of current
business and maintained in their place of origin or in the file store of an associated records
office or registry.
In the semi-current phase, they are used infrequently in the conduct of current business
and are maintained in a records center.
In the non-current phase they are destroyed unless they have a continuing value which
merits their preservation as archives in an archival institution. The effective management
of records throughout this life-cycle is a key issue in civil service reform.
3-Record Preservation
The care of records and archives is that the care should be managed through a coherent
and consistent range of actions from the development of record-keeping systems,
through the creation and preservation of records to their use as archives.
PRESERVATION OF RECORDS
The provisions of Regulation 9 and 30(8) of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure
Requirements) Regulations, 2015 state the provisions of preservations of records as under:
Preservation of Documents :-
Regulation 9 of SEBI (LODR) provides that the listed entity shall have a policy for
preservation of documents, approved by its board of directors, classifying them in at least
two categories as follows-
(b) documents with preservation period of not less than eight years after completion of
the relevant transactions:
Regulation 30(8) provides that the listed entity shall disclose on its website all such events
or information which has been disclosed to stock exchange(s) under-regulation
30(Disclosure of events or information by listed entities), and such disclosures shall be
hosted on the website of the listed entity for a minimum period of five years and
thereafter as per the archival policy of the listed entity, as disclosed on its website.
Accordingly, the companies are required to prepare a policy statement relating to the
preservation of its documents and archival of documents in the website. The following
factors need to be considered in the preparation of the preservation and archival policy
of the company.
5-Managing Archives
Documents arising out of various litigation wherein a company is a party in any manner,
shall need to be preserved as per the directions/orders of the
court(s)/tribunal(s)/judicial/other authority(ies) as may be applicable, in absence of which
the documents shall be preserved for a period of not less than eight consecutive calendar
years after conclusion of the litigation.
Model Policy
[Under Regulation 9 and 30(8) of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements)
Regulations, 2015]
6) Statutory Requirements
If as per any other law of land including Information Technology Act, a physical or
electronic record should be preserved for a longer period than what has been
stipulated in this policy, then the document shall be preserved as per the applicable
statutory stipulations.
Such disclosures shall be retained on the website of the Company for a minimum
period of five years.
Place:………
Date:………
ANNEXURE
1. Property records including purchase and sale deeds, licences, copyrights, patents
& trademarks;
2. Corporate Records including Certificate of Incorporation, Common Seal, Minutes
of Board, Committee and Shareholders’ Meetings, Register of Members and other
Statutory Records;
3. Personal files of all live employees;
4. Any other record as may be decided by the Chief Executive Officer/ Managing
Director/ Whole-time Director of the Company from time to time.
B. Documents whose preservation period shall not be less than eight years after
completion of the relevant transactions:
C. Documents whose preservation shall be for a minimum period of three years after
completion of the event:
1. Tender Documents;
3. Legal files;
Proof of sending draft Minutes of the Board / Committee and its delivery. Proof of
sending signed Minutes of the Board / Committee and its delivery.
7. Any other record as may be decided by the Chief Executive Officer/ Managing
Director/ Whole-time Director of the Company from time to time.
Humidity: It’s a very important factor. An excess of humidity creates fungus and produces
a proliferation of corrosive insects. The lack of humidity, on the other hand, produces
brittle and fragile sheets of paper. A controlled humidity between 30% and 40% is the
best standard for preservation. With the less possible variation, and the maximum of
stability, because variations of humidity provoke more damages than a stable low or
medium range.
Temperature: The lower is the temperature, the better is for preservation of Records.
However, it is suggested to maintain normal temperature in the record room, which is
required for comfortable standard for human beings in public places.
Light: Light has a considerable impact on document’s preservation. Not only the visible
light to the human eye, but the infrared or ultraviolet radiation, could cause damages. At
the environments exposed to the daylight, should be installed curtains with UV filters.
Documents exposed to more luminance, should be stored in dark places until its public
exposition.
Fire extinguisher, particular paint to be used in the room, security checks etc. need to be
mentioned here.
Safe guarding of the personal data is information about an individual that can be used to
identify him/her. Information like Aadhar number, Mobile numbers, Residential addresses,
Name, credit card numbers, etc. can all be considered personal information.
In India, by the majority of the business, the strong mechanism for safe guarding the
personal information is not yet adopted. Even when the documents or data cease to be
useful to the organisation, this doesn’t mean that the information is no longer
confidential. In such cases the data needs to be disposed of securely and cannot be placed
freely on the public platform or mixed with other kinds of data in the office. In such cases
the business should work with a trusted information destruction agency to physically
destroy both electronic and physical data.
For every organisation internal planning & procedures is the key aspect for controlling
business and the organisation should ensure the protection of the same. It is important
to place the documents with detailed office layouts throughout offices to identify key exits
in case of emergency but the other documents and forms related to internal processes
and procedures should be kept electronically on secure network drives and encourage
employees to limit print-outs.
3 Regulation 55A SEBI (Depositories Every issuer shall submit to the Stock
and Participants) Regulations, 2018 Exchanges, audit report by a practicing
company secretary on a quarterly basis,
for the purposes of reconciliation of the
total issued capital.
4 Regulation on 76 SEBI (Depositories Reconciliation of Share Capital Audit
and Participants) Regulations, 2018. Report
Other Certifications:
• Certifying that the SEBI (ICDR) Regulations, 2018 for bonus issue has been
complied with.
• Certificate for receipt of money specifically certifying that the company has
received the application/ allotment monies from the applicants of these shares.
• Quarterly certificate specifically certifying that the company has received the
application/ allotment monies from the applicants of these shares.
• Certifying that the floor price for the proposed placement to QIBs is based on the
pricing formula prescribed under Chapter VI of SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure
Requirements) Regulations, 2018.
• Certifying that debenture holders have provided their consent for changing the
terms of the Debentures whereby mentioning the existing as well as revised terms.
• The certificates corresponding to Securities under lock in have been enfaced with
non-transferability condition.
CASE LAW
In Re Securities and Exchange Board of India Vs. Shankar Civil Appeal No. 527 OF 2023,
Supreme Court of India dated 08.02.2023, in this matter the SAT came to conclusion that
role of compliance officer, was limited to redressing grievances of investors and he was
nowhere responsible for false or misleading open offer made by company. The Apex court
held that, crucial point which had been missed by SAT was that compliance officer was
also required to ensure compliance with Buyback Regulations as expressly stipulated by
regulation 19(3) of SEBI (Buyback of Securities) Regulations, 1998, decision of SAT was to
be set aside and proceeding were to be remitted back.
• requirements of the provisions of the Companies Act 2013 and Rules made
thereunder; and
• Familiarize himself with the actual practices that are followed in this regard.
requirement).
➢ Ensure that all relevant documents and attachments are legible & visible.
➢ Correctness of the records and the material departure from the facts.
• If the pay later option is selected, ensure that the filing fees is paid before the expiry
date of the challan as non-payment of fees liable for cancellation of transaction;
• As a trusted advisor of the Company, keep track of various reportable events and
advise the Company regularly to file requisite forms to avoid penalties and
regulatory actions;
• Attach the required documents duly scanned or converted into PDF with minimum
size as possible;
• Use various inbuilt utilities like “PREFILL” and complete the form by clicking on
“CHECK” and “PRE- SCRUTINY” options;
• Check the date of resolution and minute book, which authorizes the
Director/Secretary before filling the date of resolution in the form;
• DSC used by Director/ Secretary/Signatory should be same as per authority
delegation by the Board etc., as the case may be.
REGISTER OF CERTIFICATION
1) Signing of Annual Return (MGT-7);
4) Certification of E forms of MCA under Companies Act, 2013 / LLP Act, 2008;
11) Information relation to E-forms certified and signed; 12. Register of various reports
issued.
The Annual Return of a listed company or of a company having a paid up share capital of
Rs. 10 Crore or more or turnover of Rs. 50 Crore or more shall be certified by a company
secretary in whole time practice in the Form No. MGT-8.
Return certification-threshold:
While certifying the Form No. MGT 8, the PCS shall certify that:
A. The Annual Return discloses the facts as at the close of the financial year correctly and
adequately; and
B. The Company has complied with the provisions of the Act & Rules made there under
during the financial year in respect of:
the annual return in respect of which meetings, proper notices were given and the
proceedings including the circular resolutions and resolutions passed by postal
ballot, if any, have been properly recorded in the Minute Book / registers
maintained for the purpose and the same have been signed;
5) Closure of Register of Members / Security holders, as the case may be;
6) Advances/loans to its directors and/or persons or firms or companies referred in
section 185 of the Act;
7) Contracts/arrangements with related parties as specified in section 188 of the Act;
8) Issue or allotment or transfer or transmission or buy back of securities/ redemption
of preference shares or debentures/ alteration or reduction of share capital/
conversion of shares/ securities and issue of security certificates in all instances;
9) Keeping in abeyance the rights to dividend, rights shares and bonus shares
pending registration of transfer in compliance with the provisions of the Act;
10) Declaration/ payment of dividend; transfer of unpaid/ unclaimed dividend/ other
amounts as applicable to the IEPF in accordance with section 125 of the Act;
11) Signing of audited financial statement and report of directors is as per section 134
of the Act;
12) Constitution/ appointment/ re-appointments/ retirement/ filling up casual
vacancies/ disclosures of the Directors, Key Managerial Personnel and the
remuneration paid to them;
CASE LAW
In Re Deep Himanshu Desai (petitioners) Vs. Union of Indian (Respondents) Civil Writ
Petition No.9564 of 2020 High Court of Rajasthan dated 02.09.2020, in this matter it was
held that the petitioners who were treated as disqualified directors under section 164(2)(a)
sought direction to use their Director Identification Number (DIN) and Digital Signature
Certificate for purpose of filing annual return. As per the decision of court the respondents
were directed to reactivate Director Identification Number (DIN) of petitioner(s) and
Digital Signature Certificate to enable petitioner(s) to file necessary annual return and also
to discharge their statutory obligations.
While signing the Form MGT-7 (Annual Return) Company Secretary/ Company
Secretary in Practice and Director certifies that:
1. The return state the facts, as they stood on the date of the closure of the financial
year aforesaid correctly and adequately.
2. Unless otherwise expressly stated to the contrary elsewhere in this return, the
company has complied with applicable provisions of the Act during the financial
year.
3-Statutory Registers;
• Register of Securities
• Board Meeting
• General Meeting
• Committee Meeting
• Creditors Meeting
5-Notices and agenda papers for convening meetings of the Board and Committees
thereof;
7-Copy of Latest Financial Statements along with the Board’s Report and Auditors
Reports;
9-Shareholder List in Compact Disc (CD) in PDF Format, details of Share Transfers taken
place between close of the previous financial year and close of the financial year to which
Annual Return relates, Controls of the Data as on the Date of Annual General Meeting of
the company or the Beneficial Positions as on close of financial year downloaded from
the records of the Depository participants by Registrar Transfer Agent (RTA) of the
company on record/book closure date prior to AGM;
10-Certificate from RTA stating the number of shareholders as on the close of the financial
year;
12-Change of name of the company, change in the face value of the shares of the
company, new ISIN No of the company in respect of the allotment or as a result of any
change in capital structure due to any corporate action taken by the company during the
Financial year;
13-Board Resolution for any type of corporate actions taken by the company;
16-Any orders received by the company, Director or officer from the High court or from
any other regulatory body under any act;
18-List of Promoters;
19-Listing and Trading Approval(s) from Stock Exchanges, Credit Confirmation from
Depositories namely NSDL and CDSL respectively/confirmation from both depositories in
respect of allotment of equity shares of the company during the period between the
previous AGM date and current AGM date. Intimation to Stock Exchanges, Confirmation
from National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL) and Central Depository Services
(India) Limited (CDSL) for change of the name of the company, change in the face value
of equity shares, change in ISIN of the company and the Scrip Code/Symbol of the
company, etc.
• Penalty for default: penalty of Rs.10,000 and in case of continuing failure, with
further penalty of Rs.100 for each day during which such failure continues, subject
to a maximum of Rs.2 lakh incase of a company and Rs.50,000 incase of officer in
default. (Section 92)
• Disqualification: If the company has not filed its financial statement or Annual
Return for continuous period of three financial years, then every person who is or
has been director of that company shall not be eligible for re-appointment as
Director of that company or appointed in any other company for a period of five
years from the date on which the said company fails to do so. [Section 164(2)]
• Penalty for Misstatement: If in Annual Return, any Director or any Person makes a
statement (a) which is false in any material particulars, knowing it to be false; or (b)
which omits any material fact, knowing it to be material, he shall be punishable
with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than 6 months but which may
extend to 10 years and shall also be liable to fine which shall not be less than the
amount involved in the fraud, but which may extend to three times the amount
involved in the fraud. (Section 448)
• Class action suits: Under section 245, the class of shareholders or depositors may
file an application with the Tribunal alleging that the management or conduct of
the affairs of any company are being conducted in a manner prejudicial to the
interest of the company, its members or depositors. Such class action may include
suite against the company, its directors, officers, experts or any other person for
wrongful or fraudulent act. The order passed by the Tribunal shall be binding on
the Company, its directors and officers.
• Penalty: If the company has not filed its Annual Return from the date by which it
should have been filed with fee and additional fees, every officer who is in default
shall be liable to a penalty of Rs.10,000 and in case of continuing failure, with
further penalty of Rs.100 for each day during which such failure continues, subject
to a maximum of Rs.2 lakh in case of a company and Rs.50,000 incase of officer in
default. (Section 92)
• Winding up: If the Company has defaulted in filing Annual Returns for the
immediately preceding five financial years, the Company may be wound up by the
Tribunal. (Section 271)
• Inactive status: If the Company has not filed its Annual Return for last two financial
years, it will be termed as “inactive company” [Section 455(1)].
CASE LAWS
In Re AVS Enterprises (P.) Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companies, Delhi, Company Appeal (AT) no.
47 of 2021, NCLAT New Delhi dated 05.04.2022, in this matter the appellant company had
not filed annual returns with Registrar of Companies from year 2006-07 onwards and, its
name was ‘struck-off’ from Register of Companies. Further, in view of fact that company
was carrying on business operation and right to seek restoration of name of company was
not extinguished, name of company was to be restored in register of companies subject
to filing of all pending statutory documents along with late fee.
• Dormant status: If the Company has not filed its Annual Return for two financial
years consecutively, the Registrar shall issue notice to the Company and enter its
name in the Register of Dormant Companies. [Section 455(4)]
• Compounding of Offences: Provisions and procedure for compounding of
offences, which are punishable under Companies Act, 2013 are stipulated under
Section 441.
If a company secretary in practice certifies the annual return otherwise than in conformity
with the requirements of this section or the rules made thereunder, he shall be liable to a
penalty of 2,00,000 rupees. A practicing company secretary will be liable for disciplinary
actions by the Disciplinary Committee of the ICSI.
Where no AGM is held in a particular year, the Annual Return has to be filed within 60
days from the last day on which the meeting should have been held together with the
statement specifying the reasons for not holding the annual general meeting, with such
fees or additional fees as may be prescribed, within the time as specified, under section
403. [Section 92(4)]
The following guiding principles can be adopted while deciding about the extent of
checking that is required.
i. Internal Controls: The PCS shall perform a detailed review of the internal controls,
checks and balances built into the systems and procedures of the Company. If
appropriate internal controls exist, and operate effectively, the need for detailed
checking is reduced to a large extent. The system could also provide for inherent
checks, particularly in cases where the process is automated/computerized.
ii. Materiality: Similar to any audits, the principle of materiality is another important
and relevant concept. The sample chosen for detailed checking should be
iii. Risk assessment: The PCS shall have an overall understanding of the Company,
the industry in which the it operates, corporate governance practices, etc., and
perform risk assessment to identify the ‘high risk’ areas. These ‘High risk’ areas
shall be subjected to more extensive verifications. For instance, in the case of
shares on which there are restrictions on transfer statutory or otherwise, a more
extensive examination is warranted.
Further, Regulation 27(2) of SEBI(LODR), specifies that the listed entity shall submit
quarterly compliance report on corporate governance in the format specified by the Board
from time to time to recognized Stock Exchange(s) within twenty one days from close of
the quarter.
iii. Annex - III - at the end of 6 months from the close of financial year;
iv. Annex - IV - on a half yearly basis (w.e.f. first half year of the FY 21-22);
However, the compliance with the corporate governance provisions shall not apply, in
respect of following 1-The listed entity having:
2-The listed entity which has listed its specified securities on the SME Exchange.
• The CGCC from the PCS should relate to the financial year of the listed Company under
Report.
• When a PCS is assigned the compliance certification work of the Company for the first
time, he should communicate his appointment to the earlier incumbent, if a PCS, by
registered post.
• The PCS who has issued the CGCC should make himself available at the Annual General
Meeting to provide clarifications, on CGCC, if required.
• Any failure or lapse on the part of a PCS in issuing a CGCC, may not only attract
disciplinary action for professional or other misconduct under the provisions of the
Company Secretaries Act, 1980, but also make him liable for any injury caused to any
person due to his negligence in issuing the CGCC.
1. The PCS would first obtain from the listed entity its draft report on Corporate
2. Governance.
3. PCS would examine relevant records relating to Corporate Governance and obtain
necessary information and explanation from the management. An illustrative list of
compliance inputs and checklists has been indicated in each paragraph in this
Guidance Note. The list is however, not exhaustive.
4. PCS on the basis of the report and verification of such other records as well as
information and explanation so obtained, would certify the compliance of the
conditions of Corporate Governance and give his certification to the Board to be
annexed to the Board’s Report.
5. Where a Company has adopted the Voluntary Guidelines, the PCS would also
certify the compliance thereof.
TYPES OF CERTIFICATIONS
The certification may be unqualified or qualified:
(a) Unqualified certificate: An unqualified certificate should be issued when the PCS
forms the opinion that the conditions of Corporate Governance have been duly complied
with by the Company
(b) Qualified certificate: A qualified certificate should be issued when the PCS concludes
that there are certain specific non-compliances or inadequacies. A qualified certificate
should contain a brief description of non-compliances or inadequacies in compliances
and the extent thereof.
• If the PCS is unable to form any opinion with regard to any specific matter, the PCS
shall state clearly the fact that he is unable to form an opinion with regard to that
matter and the reasons therefor.
• If such limitations are so material that the PCS is unable to express any opinion,
the PCS should state that “in the absence of necessary information and records, he
is unable to certify compliance or otherwise of the conditions of Corporate
Governance by the Company”.
Section 449 of the Companies Act further provides penalty of imprisonment for a
minimum period of 3 years and a term which may extend to seven years, and fine which
may extend to ten lakhs rupees, if any person intentionally gives false evidence upon any
examination on oath or solemn affirmation
Section 23H of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 (“SCRA”), provides that,
whoever fails to comply with any provision of SCRA, the rules or articles or bye-laws or
the regulations of a recognized stock exchange or directions issued by the Securities and
Exchange Board of India for which no separate penalty has been provided, shall be liable
to a penalty which may extend to one crore rupees.
Further Section 23M of the SCRA provides that, without prejudice to any award of penalty
by the adjudicating officer under SCRA, if any person contravenes or attempts to
contravene or abets the contravention of, the provisions of SCRA or of any rules or
regulations or bye-laws made there under, for which no punishment is provided
elsewhere in SCRA, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend
to ten years, or with fine, which may extend to twenty-five crore rupees or with both. If
any person fails to pay the penalty imposed by the adjudicating officer or fails to comply
with any of his directions or orders, he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term,
which shall not be less than one month, but which may extend to ten years, or with fine,
which may extend to twenty-five crore rupees, or with both.
The listed entity which has listed its specified securities shall comply with the corporate
governance principles under following broad headings as specified in Regulation 4 :
(a) The rights of shareholders: The listed entity shall seek to protect and facilitate the
exercise of the following rights of shareholders:
(b) Timely information: The listed entity shall provide adequate and timely information
to shareholders, including but not limited to the following:
i. sufficient and timely information concerning the date, location and agenda of
general meetings, as well as full and timely information regarding the issues to be
discussed at the meeting.
ii. Capital structures and arrangements that enable certain shareholders to obtain a
degree of control disproportionate to their equity ownership.
iii. rights attached to all series and classes of shares, which shall be disclosed to
investors before they acquire shares.
(c)Equitable treatment: The listed entity shall ensure equitable treatment of all
shareholders, including minority and foreign shareholders, in the following manner:
(d) Role of stakeholders in corporate governance: The listed entity shall recognise the
rights of its stakeholders and encourage co-operation between listed entity and the
stakeholders, in the following manner:
i. The listed entity shall respect the rights of stakeholders that are established by law
or through mutual agreements.
ii. Stakeholders shall have the opportunity to obtain effective redress for violation of
their rights.
iii. Stakeholders shall have access to relevant, sufficient and reliable information
iv. The listed entity shall devise an effective vigil mechanism/whistle blower policy
(e) Disclosure and transparency: The listed entity shall ensure timely and accurate
disclosure on all material matters including the financial situation, performance,
ownership, and governance of the listed entity, in the following manner:
(f) Responsibilities of the board of directors: The board of directors of the listed entity
shall have the following responsibilities:
1-Disclosure of information:
i. Members of board of directors and key managerial personnel shall disclose to the
board of directors whether they, directly, indirectly, or on behalf of third parties,
have a material interest in any transaction or matter directly affecting the listed
entity.
ii. The board of directors and senior management shall conduct themselves so as to
meet the expectations of operational transparency to stakeholders while at the
same time maintaining confidentiality of information in order to foster a culture of
good decision- making.
i. Reviewing and guiding corporate strategy, major plans of action, risk policy, annual
budgets and business plans, setting performance objectives, monitoring
implementation and corporate performance, and overseeing major capital
expenditures, acquisitions and divestments.
ii. Monitoring the effectiveness of the listed entity’s governance practices and making
changes as needed.
iii. Selecting, compensating, monitoring and, when necessary, replacing key
managerial personnel and overseeing succession planning.
iv. Aligning key managerial personnel and remuneration of board of directors with
the longer term interests of the listed entity and its shareholders.
v. Ensuring a transparent nomination process to the board of directors with the
diversity of thought, experience, knowledge, perspective and gender in the board
of directors.
3-Other responsibilities:
i. The board of directors shall provide strategic guidance to the listed entity, ensure
effective monitoring of the management and shall be accountable to the listed
entity and the shareholders.
ii. The board of directors shall set a corporate culture and the values by which
executives throughout a group shall behave.
iii. Members of the board of directors shall act on a fully informed basis, in good faith,
with due diligence and care, and in the best interest of the listed entity and the
shareholders.
iv. The board of directors shall encourage continuing directors training to ensure that
the members of board of directors are kept up to date.
v. Where decisions of the board of directors may affect different shareholder groups
differently, the board of directors shall treat all shareholders fairly.
ii. Two Directors (out of which one shall be Managing Director); AND
iii. Chief Executive Officer/ Company Secretary/ Chief Financial Officer of the
However, Financial Statement of One Person Company shall be signed by only one
director.
CASE LAW
In Re HIFFCO Farming Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companies, NCLAT New Delhi, Company
Appeal (AT) no. 51 of 2022, dated 21.04.2022, in this matter the appellant company had
not filed financial statement with Registrar of Companies from year 2006-07 onwards and
its name was ‘struck-off’ from Register of Companies, in view of fact that company was
carrying on business operation and right to seek restoration of name of company was not
extinguished, name of company was to be restored in register of companies subject to
filing of all pending statutory documents along with late fees.
To the company:
• The provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 provides for the actions/ fine/ penalty
to be imposed on the companies in case of the default made by the company/its
officers.
i. Risk on Reputation:
⮞ Wrong certifications will not only lead to penal provisions but also will affect the
reputation of a Company Secretary’s firm and also in his individual capacity.
⮞ It may lead to possibility to lose the practice also. Apart from this there is bad rift to
ICSI. So, a PCS has to keep this in mind while certifying or attesting the forms.
⮞ The Second Schedule to the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 in clause 2 provides that
“where a Company Secretary in Practice certifies or submits in his name, or in the name
of his firm, a report of an examination of the matters relating to company secretarial
practice and related statements unless the examination of such statements has been
made by him or by a partner or an employee in his firm or by another Company Secretary
in Practice,” he shall be deemed to be guilty of professional misconduct.
⮞ Further, clauses 5, 6, 7 and 8 provide that “where a Company Secretary in Practice while
pre- certifying any e-Form or document fails to disclose a material fact known to him in
his report or statement but the disclosure of which is necessary in making such report or
statement, or fails to report a material mis-statement known to him or does not exercise
due diligence, or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his professional duties or fails to
obtain sufficient information which is necessary for expression of an opinion or its
exceptions are sufficiently material to negate the expression of an opinion,” he would be
deemed to be guilty of professional or other misconduct under the provisions of the
Company Secretaries Act, 1980.
⮞ In case there is any false statement in any material particular or omission of any material
fact in the form certified as correct by a Practicing Company Secretary, he would be liable
for disciplinary action for professional or other misconduct under the provisions of the
Company Secretaries Act, 1980.
⮞ In view of section 21B(3) of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980, in case he is found
guilty of professional or other misconduct mentioned in the second schedule to the
Company Secretaries Act, 1980, he will be liable for the following actions
a) Reprimand,
b) Removal of name from the registrar of members permanently or for such period
as may be thought fit by the disciplinary committee,
c) Fine which may extend to five lakh rupees.
⮞ With a view to ensure that the Company Secretary in practice carries out his work with
due diligence, the Registrar may carry out scrutiny of Forms on random basis. As per rule
8(9) of the Companies (Registration Officers and Fees) Rules, 2014, where any instance of
filing document, application or return etc. containing a false or misleading information or
omission of material fact, requiring action under section 448 or section 449 is observed,
the person shall be liable under section 448 and 449 of the Act. Section 448 of Companies
Act, 2013 deals with penalty for false statements.
⮞ The section provide that if in any return, report, certificate, financial statement,
prospectus, statement or other document required by, or for the purposes of any of the
provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, any person makes a statement, –
⮞ Section 447 deals with punishment for fraud which provides that any person who is
found to be guilty of fraud, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall
not be less than six months but which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to
fine which shall not be less than the amount involved in the fraud, but which may extend
to three times the amount involved in the fraud. In case, the fraud in question involves
public interest, the term of imprisonment shall not be less than three years.
⮞ In view of this, a Company Secretary in Practice will be attracting the penal provisions
of section 448, for any false statement in any material particular or omission of any
material fact in the e forms. However, a person will be penalized under section 448 in case
he makes a statement, which is false in any material particular, knowing it to be false, or
which omits any material fact knowing it to be material.
⮞ It is pertinent to note that section 448 applies to “any person”. In view of this, a company
secretary in practice, who is an independent professional, will be attracting the penalty,
as prescribed in section 448 in case his observations in the secretarial audit report turns
out to be false or he omits any material fact, knowing it to be false or material.
Certificate shall be de-activated by the central government till a final decision is taken in
this regard.
Also, The Regional Director or the Registrar as the case may be, shall conduct a quick
inquiry against the professionals who certified the form and signatory thereof including
an officer in default who appears prima facie responsible for submitting false or
misleading or incorrect information pursuant to requirement of above said Rules, 15 days’
notice may be given for the purpose. The Regional Director or the Registrar will submit
his/her report in respect of the inquiry initiated, irrespective of the outcome, to the E-
Governance cell of the Ministry within 15 days of the expiry of period given for submission
of an explanation with recommendation in initiating action under section 447 and 448 of
the Act wherever applicable and also regarding referral of the matter to the concerned
professional Institute for initiating disciplinary proceedings.
The E-Governance cell of the Ministry shall process each case so referred and issue
necessary instructions to the Regional Director/ Registrar of Companies for initiating
action under section 448 and 449 of the Act wherever prima facie cases have been made
out. The E-Governance cell will thereafter refer such cases to the concerned Institute for
conducting disciplinary proceedings against the errant member as well as debar the
concerned professional from filing any document on the MCA portal in future.
The Registrar shall forward a fortnightly report to the concerned Regional Director as well
as to the E-Governance Division. Thereafter, the Regional Director shall forward a
consolidated report to the Joint Secretary E-Governance Division on or before 7thof every
month.
INTRODUCTION-
Lesson 2
Recognition of Company Secretary Profession-A fascinating journey
In 1887, Lord Justice Esher made the remarks on the duties of the Company Secretary
while writing out his judgment in The Court of Appeal in Barnett Hoares & Co. v South
London Tramways Co. (18 QBD 1887) that, company secretaries could not be assumed to
have authority for anything. A Secretary is a mere servant, his position is that he is to do
what he is told.
It took 90 years for the Judiciary to take note of the emergence of the Company Secretary
in the Corporate World. The remarks made by the celebrated Lord Denning, in Panorama
Developments (Gilford) Ltd v. Fidelis Furnishing Fabrics Limited (1971) (3 All ER 16) (CA)
observed as under:
According to the section 205 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with rule 10 of the
Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014, the
Company Secretary must perform the following functions and duties:
• To report to the Board about compliance with the provisions of this Act, the rules
made thereunder and other laws applicable to the company;
• To ensure that the company complies with the applicable secretarial standards;
• To facilitate the convening of meetings and attend Board, committee and general
meetings and maintain the minutes of these meetings;
• To obtain approvals from the Board, general meeting, the government and such
other authorities as required under the provisions of the Act;
• To represent before various regulators, and other authorities under the Act in
connection with discharge of various duties under the Act;
• To assist and advise the Board in ensuring good corporate governance and in
complying with the corporate governance requirements and best practices; and
• To discharge such other duties as have been specified under the Act or rules; and
• Such other duties as may be assigned by the Board from time to time.
CASE LAW
Mayank Agarwal (Applicant) VS. M/s. Technology Frontiers (India) Private Limited
(Respondent Company) National Company Law Tribunal (Chennai Bench) IA/2/2021 in
CP/75/CHE/2021
The Company Secretary can represent before various regulators and other authorities
in connection with discharge of various duties under the Act. The NCLT being a quasi-
judicial authority the Company Secretary can very well do the same.
In this case, the Company Secretary of the respondent company had sent the notice to
the applicant under Section 90(5), (who is nominee director of the Respondent
Company) on May 3rd, 2021 along with the form to disclose their Ultimate Beneficial
Ownership of the shares held.
However, the applicant alleged that the company alone is empowered to apply to NCLT
under Section-90(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Company Secretary has not taken
approval from Board of directors to file the present petition.
The Company Secretary of Respondent Company in his written submission stated that
he has the locus standi as per the board resolution passed for his appointment which
clearly states that “he can perform any duties as required under Companies Act, 2013”
and have the authority to enter into pleadings on behalf of company even in absence
of formal board authorization. Further, he referred to the provisions of section 205 of
the Companies Act 2013, under which he is authorized to represent and that it is his
duty to do so.
Order: The usage of the words “Company shall give notice” under Section 90(5) makes
it amply clear that the Key Managerial Personnel have to do this activity of seeking
information; in order to find out the Ultimate Beneficial Owners. The Company Secretary
has acted diligently and promptly to ensure compliance of the mandatory provisions.
Hence, the application stand dismissed.
Further, as per regulation 6(2) of the SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, a listed company is
required to appoint a qualified company secretary as the compliance officer. The
compliance officer of the Company is responsible for:
a) ensuring conformity with the regulatory provisions applicable to the listed entity in
letter and spirit;
b) co-ordination with and reporting to the Board, recognised stock exchange(s) and
depositories with respect to compliance with rules, regulations and other directives of
these authorities in the manner as specified from time to time;
c) ensuring that the correct procedures have been followed that would result in the
correctness, authenticity and comprehensiveness of the information, statements and
reports filed by the listed entity under these regulations;
• such other officer, not more than one level below the directors who is in whole-
Associate Members
No person shall be entitled to have his name entered in the Register of Members as an Associate,
unless he, –
a) has passed examinations conducted by the dissolved company and has completed
practical training
b) has passed the qualifying examinations and completed the practical training as prescribed
c) has passed such other examination and completed such other training outside India as is
d) had registered himself as a student with the Institute of Chartered Secretaries and
Administrators, London on or before 31st December, 1972 and had passed the Final
e) is an Indian citizen who is a “person resident outside India” under FEMA, 1999 and has
Fellow Members
As per section 5 of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980, A person, being an Associate
who has been in continuous practice in India as a Company Secretary for at least five
years and a person who has been an Associate for a continuous period of not less than
five years and who possesses such qualifications or practical experience as the Council
may prescribe with a view to ensuring that he has experience equivalent to the
experience normally acquired as a result of continuous practice for a period of five years
as a Company Secretary shall, on payment of such fees, as may be determined, by
notification, by the Council, and on application made and granted in the prescribed
manner, be entered in the Register of members as a Fellow.
• No person shall be entitled to have his name entered in the Register of Members as a Fellow
unless He, -
a) was a Fellow including Honorary Fellow of the dissolved company immediately before the
commencement of the Act; or
c) is an Associate and has been in continuous practice in India as a Company Secretary for at
least five years; or
d) is an Associate for a continuous period of not less than five years and possesses such
qualifications or practical experience as may be determined by the Council.
a) he has been found guilty of any professional or other misconduct and his name has been
removed from the Register at any time during the preceding five years on the date of
application; or
b) he has not completed such minimum numbers of Professional Development Credit Hours
Certificate of practice
A member is entitled to continue the practice of Company Secretary, whether in India or
elsewhere, only after obtaining a Certificate of Practice.
a) engages himself in the practice of the profession of Company Secretaries to, or in relation to,
any company; or
e) renders professional services or assistance with respect to matters of principle or detail relating
to the practice of the profession of Company Secretaries; or
f) renders such other services as, in the opinion of the Council, are or may be rendered by a
Company Secretary in practice.
REGISTER OF MEMBERS
Institute shall maintain a Register of Members his full name, date of birth, domicile,
residential and professional addresses;
a) membership number and the date on which his name is entered in the Register;
b) his qualifications;
d) email-id, mobile number, telephone number if any, and such other particulars as
may be determined by the Council.
The member shall communicate to the Institute any change of his details entered in the
Register, within thirty days of such change.
c) who has not paid any prescribed fee required to be paid by him; or
d) who is found to have been subject at the time when his name was entered in the
Register of members, or who at any time thereafter has become subject, to any of
the disabilities mentioned in section 8, or who for any other reason has ceased to
be entitled to have his name borne on the Register of members.
Disciplinary Mechanism
Disciplinary Directorate
Section 21 of the Act provides for the establishment of a Disciplinary Directorate headed
by an officer of the Institute designated as Director (Discipline) and such other employees
for making investigations in respect of any information or complaint received by it. On
receipt of any information or complaint along with the prescribed fee, the Director
(Discipline) shall arrive at a prima facie opinion on the occurrence of the alleged
misconduct.
1. Where the Director (Discipline) is of the opinion that a member is guilty of any
professional or other misconduct mentioned in the First Schedule, the matter shall be
placed before the Board of Discipline and take any one or more of the following
actions, namely:—
(b) remove the name of the member from the Register up to a period of three months;
(c) impose such fine as it may think fit which may extend to rupees one lakh.
2. Where the Director (Discipline) is of the opinion that a member is guilty of any
professional or other misconduct mentioned in the Second Schedule or in both the
Schedules, the matter shall be placed the Disciplinary Committee and take any one or
more of the following actions, namely:—
(a) Reprimand the member;
(b) Remove the name of the member from the Register permanently or for such
period, as it thinks fit;
(c) impose such fine as it may think fit, which may extend to rupees five lakhs.
Board of Discipline
Section 21C of the Company Secretaries Act, 1980 provides that for the purposes of an
inquiry under the provisions of this Act, the Authority, the Disciplinary Committee, Board
of Discipline and the Director (Discipline) shall have the same powers as are vested in a
civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in respect of the following matters,
namely:—
(a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on
oath;
APPEAL TO AUTHORITY
Section 22A: any member of the Institute aggrieved by any order of the Board of Discipline
or the Disciplinary Committee may within ninety days from the date on which the order
is communicated to him, prefer an appeal to the Authority.
Company Secretaries must take care while certifying the Annual Return. Any failure or
lapse on the part of PCS may attract penalty under-
Section 447, sections 448and 449 of Companies Act, 2013. Section 447 deals with
punishment for fraud which provides that any person who is found to be guilty of fraud
involving an amount of at least ten lakh rupees or one per cent. of the turnover of the
company, whichever is lower shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall
not be less than six months but which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to
fine which shall not be less than the amount involved in the fraud, but which may extend
to three times the amount involved in the fraud: Provided that where the fraud in question
involves public interest, the term of imprisonment shall not be less than three years.
Provided further that where the fraud involves an amount less than ten lakh rupees or one
per cent. of the turnover of the company, whichever is lower, and does not involve public
interest, any person guilty of such fraud shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term
which may extend to five years or with fine which may extend to fifty lakh rupees or with
both.
Section 448 provides that if in any return, report, certificate, financial statement,
prospectus, statement or other document required by, or for, the purposes of any of the
provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, any person makes a statement, –
In view of this, a professional will be penalised under section 448 in case he makes the
statement, which is false in any material particulars, knowing it to be false, or which omits
any material fact knowing it to be material.
(b) Remove the name of the member from the Register up to a period of three months;
(c) Impose such fine as it may think fit which may extend to rupees one lakh.
In the matters, which are placed before the Disciplinary Committee, and Where the
Disciplinary Committee is of the opinion that a member is guilty of a professional or other
misconduct mentioned in the Second Schedule or both the First Schedule and the Second
Schedule, it afford to the member an opportunity of being heard before making any order
against him and may thereafter take any one or more of the following actions, namely:—
(a) Reprimand the member;
(b) Remove the name of the member from the Register permanently or for such period,
as it thinksfit;
(c) Impose such fine as it may think fit, which may extend to rupees five lakhs
1. Allows any person to practice in his name as a Company Secretary unless such person
is also a Company Secretary in practice and is in partnership with or employed by him;
2. pays or allows or agrees to pay or allow, directly or indirectly, any share, commission
or brokerage in the fees or profits of his professional business, to any person other
than member of the Institute or a partner or a retired partner or the legal
representative of a deceased partner, or a member of any other professional body or
with such other persons having such qualifications as may be prescribed for the
purpose of rendering such professional services from time to time in or outside India.
3. accepts or agrees to accept any part of the profits of the professional work of a person
who isnot a member of the Institute: Provided that nothing herein contained shall be
construed as prohibiting a member from entering into profit sharing or other similar
arrangements, including receiving any share commission or brokerage in the fees,
witha member of such professional body or other person having qualifications, as is
referred to in item (2) of this part;
4. enters into partnership, in or outside India, with any person other than a Company
Secretary in practice or such other person who is a member of any other professional
body having such qualifications as may be prescribed, including a resident who but
for his residence abroad would be entitled to be registered as a member under clause
(e) of sub-section (1) of section 4 or whose qualifications are recognized by the Central
Government or the Council for the purpose of permitting such partnerships;
• Pays or allows or agrees to pay, directly or indirectly, to any person any share in
the emoluments of the employment undertaken by him;
• accepts or agrees to accept any part of fees, profits or gains from a lawyer, a
Company Secretary or broker engaged by such company, firm or person or agent
or customer of such company, firm or person by way of commission or
gratification.
• does not supply the information called for, or does not comply with the requirements
asked for, by the Institute, Council or any of its Committees, Director (Discipline), Board
of Discipline, Disciplinary Committee, Quality Review Board or the Appellate Authority;
• while inviting professional work from another Company Secretary or while responding
to tenders or enquiries or while advertising through a write up, or anything as provided
for in items (6) and (7) of Part I of this Schedule, gives information knowing it to be
false.
• he is held guilty by any civil or criminal court for an offence which is punishable with
imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months;
• in the opinion of the Council, he brings disrepute to the profession or the institute as
a result of his action whether or not related to his professional work.
• certifies or submits in his name, or in the name of his firm, a report of an examination
of the matters relating to company secretarial practice and related statements unless
the examination of such statements has been made by him or by a partner or an
employee in his firm or by another Company Secretary in practice;
• permits his name or the name of his firm to be used in connection with any report or
statement contingent upon future transactions in a manner which may lead to the
belief that he vouches for the accuracy of the forecast;
• Expresses his opinion on any report or statement given to any business or enterprise
in which he, his firm, or a partner in his firm has a substantial interest;
• Fails to disclose a material fact known to him in his report or statement but the
disclosure of which is necessary in making such report or statement, where he is
concerned with such report or statement in a professional capacity;
• Fails to report a material mis-statement known to him and with which he is concerned
in a professional capacity;
• Does not exercise due diligence, or is grossly negligent in the conduct of his
professional duties;
• contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the regulations made thereunder or
any guidelines issued by the Council;
1) The Council shall consider the report of the Disciplinary Committee and if in its
opinion, a further enquiry is necessary, may cause such further enquiry to be made
the case may be, where the Council finds that the respondent is not guilty of any
professional or other misconduct, it shall record its findings accordingly and direct
that the proceedings shall be filed or the complaint shall be dismissed as the case
may be.
the case may be, where the Council finds that the respondent has been guilty of a
professional or other misconduct, it shall record its findings accordingly and shall
4) Where the finding is that the member of the Institute has been guilty of a professional or
other misconduct, the Council shall afford to the member an opportunity of being heard
before orders are passed against him in the case. The Council after hearing the respondent,
if he appears in person or after considering the representations, if any, made by him, pass
such orders as it may think fit, as provided under Subsection (4) of Section 21.
5) The orders passed by the Council shall be communicated to the complainant and the
respondent.
UDIN
The Unique Document Identification Number as governed by the UDIN Guidelines shall
verify the authenticity of various documents signed or certified by Company Secretaries
in Practice. As per the UDIN Guidelines, a unique number for the identification of
documents attested by Company Secretaries in Practice shall be generated at the time of
signing the Certificate/ Report which shall mandatorily be mentioned in the Certificate /
Report along with the CoP number.
UDIN is a 17-digit system generated number which is used to verify the authenticity of
documents attested / certified by a Company Secretary in Practice. Quoting UDIN on
certifications, w.r.t the professional services has been made mandatory w.e.f 1st October,
2019.
The UDIN Guidelines have been issued by the Institute of Company Secretaries of India
(“ICSI”) in order to-
eCSIN
The following activities are permitted for a Company Secretary in Practice as means to
advertise:
(iii) Display of Location and décor of the workplace, meeting rooms, etc.
(iv) Display of Firm name, Logo or any other identity on Uniform, Office/s, office
organizations.
(x) Use of social media like Facebook, Instagram, Linkedin, Twitter, Youtube, WeChat,
Advertisement Restrictions
(iii) not claim superiority over any or all other Company Secretaries;
(iv) not be indecent, sensational or otherwise of such nature which may bring disrepute
to the profession or the Institute (ICSI);
(v) not contain fabricated or false testimonials or endorsements concerning the
Company Secretary;
(vi) not refer the Company Secretaries in the terms such as “specialists” or “experts”;
Explanation: The advertisements shall not be self-laudatory and not include the
(vii) not represent that the quality of the professional services to be performed is
(viii) not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of any
professional assignment;
(ix) in no way indicate that the charging of a fee is contingent on outcome, or that no
(xi) not be designed for “pleasing customers,” which might mislead or eventually harm
(xii) not contain any humorous slogans. E.g. Save Rs. Xxxx Come to us, we will tell you
how.
PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES
For instance, default in filing annual return of company within sixty days from the date on
which the annual general meeting is held, then every officer who is in default shall be
liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees and in case of continuing failure, with further
penalty of one hundred rupees for each day during which such failure continues, subject
to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case
of an officer who is in default. Further, if a company secretary in practice certifies the
annual return otherwise than in conformity with the requirements of this section or the
rules made thereunder, he shall be liable to a penalty of two lakh rupees.
Statutory Liabilities
Professional Liabilities
of a Company secretary
may be divided ito two
catgories
Contractual Liabilities
Statutory Liabilities
Statutory liabilities of the Company Secretary refer to those that the Company Secretary
is legally bound to obey. The followings are some of the statutory liability of Company
Secretaries:
(iii) Issuing share certificates, dividend warrants, and bonus share certificates to the
shareholders;
(iv) Preparation of minutes of various meetings and maintaining minute books, etc.
Contractual Liabilities
(iv) Liable to abide by all terms and conditions of the service contract;
TYPES/BRANCHES OF ETHICS
Descriptive Ethics Descriptive Ethics is also called comparative ethics because it compares
the ethics or past and present;ethics of one society and other.
Meta-Ethics or “analytical ethics” It deals with the origin of the ethical concepts
themselves. It does not consider whether an action is good or bad, right or wrong. Rather,
it questions – what goodness or rightness or morality itself is. It is basically a highly
abstract way of thinking about ethics. It’s a study of “ethical action” and sets out the
rightness or wrongness of the actions. It is also called prescriptive ethics because it rests
on the principles which determine whether an action is right or wrong.
Applied Ethics It deals with the philosophical examination, from a moral standpoint, of
particular issues in private and public life which are matters of moral judgment. This
branch of ethics is most important for professionals in different walks of life including
doctors, teachers, administrators, rulers and so on. There are six key domains of applied
ethics viz. Decision ethics {ethical decision making process}, Professional ethics for good
professionalism}, Clinical Ethics {good clinical practices}, Business Ethics{good business
practices}, Organizational ethics {ethics within and among organizations} and social ethics.
• Ethics are consistent, whereas values are different for different persons, i.e. what is
important for one person, may not be important for another person.
• Values tell us what we want to do or achieve in our life, whereas ethics helps us in
deciding what is morally correct or incorrect, in the given situation.
• Ethics determines to what extent our options are right or wrong. As opposed to
values, this defines our priorities for life.
ETHICAL PRACTICES
• Least Harm: This theory deals with situations in which no choice appears beneficial. In
such cases, decision makers seek to choose to do the least harm possible and to do
harm to the fewest people. This principle is mainly associated with the utilitarian ethical
theory discussed below.
• Utilitarian: This is a normative ethical theory that places the locus of right and wrong
solely on the outcome or consequences of choosing one action/policy over other.
• Autonomy: This principle states that decision making should focus on allowing people
to be autonomous; that is, to be able to make decisions that apply to their own
workplace or lives. In other words, people should have control over their own selves
as much as possible because they are the only people who completely understand
their chosen type of work/life style.
• Justice: The justice ethical principle states that decision makers should focus on actions
that are fair to all those involved. This means that ethical decisions should be
consistent with the ethical circumstances that can be justified and exist in the case.
PROFESSIONAL ETHICS
Ethics arises from three main factors, moral attitudes as a result of consciousness or
awareness-raising, culture as a result of education and the use of know-how and the
application of standards as a result of learning and training.
Complying with the laws of land where business is conducted and engaging in fair
practices in the light of social ethics.
Aiming to become a sensible corporate citizen, and striving for harmony with local
society.
• Strive for excellence: This is the first step to achieving greatness in whatever
endeavor one undertakes; it is the quality that marks one’s work to stand-out.
Excellence is a quality of service which is remarkably good and so it surpasses ordinary
standards, it should be made a habit to make a good impression on clients and
colleagues.
• Be accountable: It implies that one should be able to stand tall and be counted upon
for all actions undertaken; this is also construed as a quality of being credible and
responsible for actions performed and their consequences - good or bad Be courteous
and respectful: Courteousness is more than being friendly, polite and well- mannered
with a gracious consideration towards others.
• Be honest, open and transparent: Honesty is a facet of moral character that connotes
positive and virtuous attributes such as truthfulness, straightforwardness, good
conduct, loyalty, fairness, sincerity and openness in communication.
• Be ethical: Ethical behavior is acting within certain moral codes in accordance with
the generally accepted code of conduct or rules. It is always safe for a professional to
“play by the rules” where the rule book is inadequate; and acting with a clear moral
conscience is the right way to adopt.
• High Integrity: Honorable action is behaving in a way that portrays “nobility of soul,
magnanimity of person” derived from virtuous conduct and integrity in adherence to
the dictum of “wholeness or completeness” of character in line with certain values,
beliefs and principles with consistency in action and outcome.
One gains trust and respect of those confiding and enhances professional credibility
within the organization.
• Set Good Examples: Applying the foregoing rules helps one to improve traits of
professionalism by imparting knowledge to those around and below the rank and file.
ICSA UK code:
Integrity
Integrity is the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles. The term has
been described judicially as connoting “moral soundness, rectitude, and steady adherence
to an ethical code”.
It requires that members are impartial, independent and informed. Displaying integrity
includes:
responsibilities;
• avoiding conflicts of interest, or, where a conflict arises, making sure that everyone
This includes:
• maintaining professional knowledge and skills which are required to perform the
role which you are employed to carry out;
• completing CPD as required by the UKRIAT Committee (this does not apply to
students);
• communicating effectively and promptly with your clients, colleagues and
stakeholders to ensure thatthey are able to make informed decisions;
Professional behavior
• being convicted of an offence which might bring discredit on the Institute or the
profession;
Tribunal.
Members are required to uphold the Institute's Charter and comply with the Bye-
laws.
Members shall at all times safeguard the interests of their employers, colleagues
or clients provided that Members shall not knowingly be a party to any illegal or
unethical activity.
Members shall not enter into any agreement or undertake any activity which may
be in conflict with the legitimate interest of their employer or client or which would
prejudice the performance of their professional duties.
Members shall not use any confidential information obtained in the performance
of their duties for personal gain nor in a manner which would be detrimental to
their employer, client or any other party.
Members shall ensure the currency of their knowledge, skills and technical
competencies in relation to their professional activities.
Members shall refrain from conduct or action which detracts from the reputation
of the Institute.
act in the best interests of a client in any matter in which he represents the client;
possible;
Professional Opportunity
The professional should not exploit for their own personal gain, opportunities that are
discovered through third party, information or position unless the opportunity is disclosed
fully in writing and permits to pursue such opportunity.
A professional must not take unfair advantage of the obvious error of another
professional or other person, if to do so would obtain for a client a benefit which has no
supportable foundation in law or fact.
Confidentiality
A professional must not disclose any information which is confidential to a client and
acquired by him during the client’s engagement to any person who is not:
3. the professional discloses the information in a confidential setting, for the sole
purpose of obtaining advice in connection with the solicitor’s legal or ethical
obligations; serious criminal offence;
Inadvertent disclosure
A professional who reads part or all of the confidential material before becoming aware
of its confidential status must:
notify the same or the other person immediately; and not read any more of the
material.
Conflicts
Any situation that involves or may involve a conflict of interest must be promptly
disclosed. A professional must not act for a client where there is a conflict between the
duty to serve the best interests of a client and the interests of the professional or an
associate of the professional, except as permitted.
A professional must not exercise any undue influence intended to dispose the client to
benefit the professional in excess of the professional fair remuneration for legal services
provided to the client.
• make any statement which grossly exceeds the legitimate assertion of the rights or
entitlements of the client, and which misleads or intimidates the other person;
• use tactics that go beyond legitimate advocacy and which are primarily designed to
embarrass or frustrate another person.
A professional must not in the course of practice, engage in conduct which constitutes:
discrimination;
sexual harassment
A professional must not publish or take steps towards the publication of any material
concerning current proceedings which may prejudice a fair trial or the administration of
justice. Ethical Dilemma Ethical Dilemma is the situation where a person’s view regarding
selecting an object or the alternative includes series of outcomes, which is very confusing.
Each outcome has a serious overlapping outcome, which cannot be at a time wrong for
one person but the same may be ethically wrong for the other. An “absolute” or “pure”
ethical dilemma only occurs when two (or more) ethical standards apply to a situation but
are in conflict with each other. In ethical dilemma if we obey one decision then it would
bring about disobeying another. Ethical dilemma is also known as moral dilemma. Ethical
dilemmas make the situations too difficult. A person has to choose only one way from
two of them - a moral or an immoral way.
A secretary discovers her boss has been laundering money, and she must decide
whether or not to turn him in
A doctor refuses to give a terminal patient morphine, but the nurse can see the patient
is in agony • While responding to a domestic violence call, a police officer finds out
that the attacker is the brother of the police chief, and the police chief tells the officer
to “make it go away”
A government contractor discovers that intelligence agencies have been spying on its
citizens illegally, but is bound by contract and legalities to keep his confidentiality
about the discovery
1. Unclear Policies in some cases, managers and employees exhibit poor ethical
behaviour because the company does not offer a clear model of ethics. Some
businesses have no formal ethical policy documents and offer no guidance at all.
Others have policies that are unclear, vague, inconsistent or not consistently enforced.
2. Conflict between Organizational & Individual Goal: When the Organizational &
Individual Goals overlap, it becomes difficult to balance things. The problem arises
when one thing has to be sacrificed for the sake of others. To achieve Organizational
goal, Individual goal, has to be compromised and vice versa so this leads to Ethical
Dilemma.
3. Cultural Value & Background: Every individual decision is based on background. For
some people it may be ethical to give priority for self and then decide about others
but for some others it may be other way round. Thus background & value system
creates the ethical Dilemma.
5. Dynamic & Different Human Nature: Ethical Dilemma arises due to difference of the
opinion among the group of people. Whatever is ethical for one person may be
unethical for another.
7. Pressure from Management: Each company’s culture is different, but some companies
stress profits and results above all. In these environments, management may turn a
blind eye to ethical breaches if a worker produces results, given the firm’s mentality of
“the end justifies the means.” Whistle-blowers may be reluctant to come forward for
fear of being regarded as untrustworthy and not a team player. Therefore, ethical
dilemmas can arise when people feel pressurized to do immoral things to please their
bosses or when they feel that they can’t point out their co-workers’ or superiors’ bad
behaviors.
8. Negotiation Skills: While these factors can cause ethical dilemmas for workers within
their own companies, doing business with other firms can also present opportunities
for breaches. Pressure to get the very best deal or price from another business can
cause some workers to negotiate in bad faith or lieto get a concession.
9. Conflicting Values: Ethical dilemmas may occur because of conflicting values between
two or more people in an organization. One manager may value product quality over
quantity while another may value thriftiness. These managers may discuss changing
to a cheaper supplier for a material used in production because of the potential to
save money. However, the first manager may object because he knows the cheaper
material will produce a product of lesser quality, which is not good for customers.
Without a culture of shared values, the least ethical choice may be approved.
Think about outcomes if you find yourself in a situation when this approach doesn’t work,
you can resolve a right versus right dilemma by finding the highest “right.” Kidder wrote
that there are three ways to make the bestchoice when faced with these types of
dilemmas:
⌂ Ends-based: Select the option that generates the most good for the most people.
⌂ Care-based: Choose as if you were the one most affected by your decision. Once
you’ve identified an ethical right versus right dilemma, lay out your options
according to these three principles. One approach will immediately present itself
as the “most right”.
The human traits and characteristics shape human behavior and a few probable solutions
are explained below:
1. Satisfaction
To achieve happiness it is essential that the culture of ‘being satisfied’ is developed.
However, the most challenging and unanswerable question on satisfaction is “How
much is Enough” The issue is very difficult to resolve especially in the corporate field
where expansion is the prime direction in which it is supposed to move.
3. Ethical Leadership
The Professional should lead the organisation like Krishna as he led Pandvas to success
by guiding them to fight morally. It is the duty of the leader driving the organization
to ensure use of proper and ethical means in his conduct.
4. Character
Professional should always consider the old idiom: If Character Is Lost Everything Is
Lost. The idiom amply highlights the importance of good character. Character is
generally built or earned by virtues like courage, honesty, values and ethics. Great
leaders and eminent personalities are judged by their character. A good character is
synonymous to reliability.
United Airlines felt the fallout worldwide when two security officers forcibly removed
a bloodied passenger off an overbooked United flight Consumers worldwide reacted
with horror and quickly called for a boycott. Making matters worse: United CEO Oscar
Munoz apologized for the incident in rather sanitized corporate speak, saying“this is
an upsetting event to all of us here at United” — underestimating just how viscerally
disturbing the video had been, and how dissatisfied fliers were with the airline industry.
Adding salt to the open wound, media reports revealed that Munoz had called Dao
“disruptive and belligerent” in a letter to employees. While the incident wasn’t
expected to hurt profits, the debacle struck a chord among consumers who have dealt
with years of flagging service standards aboard flights. Even after Dao and United
settled out of court, the frustrations unleashed upon airlines would not stop, with
complaints against airlines up 13% in the six months following the incident, according
to data from the U.S. Department of Transportation.
The year following the presidential election became one for Congress and internet titans
to rethink their role in the democratic process. Amid speculation that fake news spread
on social media may have influenced the 2016 elections, giants such as Facebook and
Google appeared to dismiss the possibility. But that changed in 2017, with Facebook and
Google which derive a major chunk of their revenue from ad placements both saying that
they had found accounts tied to the Russian government. Facebook reported some 3,000
Kremlin-linked ads aimed at dividing the country that had been bought on its platform.
Google, meanwhile, found tensof thousands of ads bought by Russia-linked entities on
YouTube and Gmail. Twitter also revealed that a news outlet paid for by the Russian
government, Russia Today, had spent $274,000 in ads on the platform in 2016.There’s no
indication that the questions will stop any time soon. Twitter, Facebook, and Google are
still investigating how much Russian activity there had been on their platforms. Adding to
big tech’s big problems: Congress appears to be taking a harder stance against the sector,
with some on Capitol Hill questioning theway they are getting users to keep coming back.
In 2016, Samsung dealt with exploding Note 7 batteries. In 2017, it was imploding
corporate ranks. Originally planning to put their Lee Jae-yong at the head of the empire,
the family-run Samsung conglomerate is now facing questions of succession after Lee
was caught in a sprawling political scandal that took down former South Korean President
Park Guen-hye. Lee Jae-yong is now facing five years (and potentially 12) in jail for offering
allegedly offering bribes to Park, embezzlement, and hiding assets overseas. Samsung
Electronics co-CEO Kwon Oh-hyun meanwhile also resigned in October, citing Samsung’s
leadership woes. “As we are confronted with unprecedented crisis inside out, I believe that
time has now come for the company [to] start anew, with a new spirit and young
leadership to better respond to challenges arising from the rapidly changingIT industry,”
he said in a statement. While Samsung’s long-term health is still on shaky ground, the
company’s near-term outlook belies those worries. The company posted record-breaking
profits in the third quarter of $12.8 billion, almost triple the number it posted a year earlier.
The tech giant’s year ended with a bang, after reports that Apple had purposely slowed
down older iPhones to compensate for decaying batteries. It appeared to feed into a long-
time conspiracy theory among some Apple users: that the company had been purposely
slowing down old models when a new version came out in a bid to force consumers to
upgrade. Now, the company is facing lawsuits for allegedly slowing down the devices
without first warning consumers. In response, Apple has apologized for slowing down the
iPhones, calling it a “misunderstanding,” and offered to sell battery replacements for $29
instead of the usual $79. Apple has saidthat once the battery is replaced, the iPhone’s
speed will pick up again.
What is at stake?
Explain the actions – you should be able to justify them in a logical manner
You should have
How did my decision turn out? Who was affected and how?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has also described
various principles on “Corporate Governance” one of these Principle includes Disclosure
and Transparency, which states “The Corporate Governance framework should ensure that
timely and accurate disclosure is made on all material matters regarding the corporation,
including the financial situation, performance, ownership, and governance of the
company.”
• Board meetings (Dates, times and locations of Board meetings are conveyed at
the state; they establish a “right-to-know” legal process where requests can be
• Budgetary reviews
• Annual audits
• Board of Directors and names of key staff as well as their contact information
• Disclosed partnerships
• Frank, open communications including the good and bad.
• Core Values & Code of Conduct.
FINE PENALTY
Fine has been used as punished for Penalty has been used to indicate civil
criminal offence. offence
Fine can be imposed only by a court of law. penalty may be imposed even by an
administrative officer.
A non-cognizable offence as per section 2(l) of the CrPC means an offence for which, a
police officer has no authority to arrest without a warrant.
Section 212(6) provides, offence covered under section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013
shall be cognizable and no person accused of any offence under those sections shall be
released on bail or on his own bond unless-
1. the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to oppose the application for
such release; and
2. where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application, the court is satisfied that
there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence and
that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail:
Provided that a person, who, is under the age of sixteen years or is a woman or is sick or
infirm, may be released on bail, if the Special Court so directs:
Provided further that the Special Court shall not take cognizance of any offence referred
to this sub-section except upon a complaint in writing made by –
Broadly the offences under the Act are classified, for the purpose of punishment, into two
categories, namely, –
Accordingly, all other offences, i.e., offences punishable with (a) fine only, or (b) fine or
imprisonment and (c) fine or imprisonment or both are compoundable offences under
the Act.
(b) company becoming ineligible to undertake buy-back of its equity shares or other
specified securities,
Section 447 stipulates that without prejudice to any liability including repayment of any
debt under this Act or any other law for the time being in force, any person who is found
to be guilty of:
FRAUD PUNISHMENTS
Where the fraud in question involves term of imprisonment shall not be less
public interest than 3 years
Involves an amount less than Rs. 10 Lakhs imprisonment for a term which may
or 1% of the turnover of the company, extend to 5 years or with fine which may
whichever is lower, and does not involve extend to Rs. 50 Lakhs or with both.
public interest, any person guilty of such
fraud shall be punishable with:
CASE LAW
In Re Komal Chadha Vs. Serious Fraud Investigation Office, high Court of Delhi BAIL
APPLN. NO. 1740 OF 2022, The accused-petitioner was summoned in the matter
through the summoning order made by the Special Judge (Companies Act) stating that
she was the director of PPPL (first accused), being the wife of Suman Chadha, who was
the other director of the company.
The gravamen of the offences alleged under section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013
was that the company, which was engaged in the trade of plastic granules, indulged in
cash sales, in fictitious sale of food grain and in creation of accommodation/adjustment
accounting entries, apart from misuse of cheque discounting facilities. It was also
alleged that the company manipulated financial statements, to project substantial
growth in its revenues, to mislead banks, so as to induce them to extend and enhance
credit limits, which monies were not used towards the business activity of the company
but were diverted and siphoned-off to other entities, with no genuine underlying
business transactions, thereby indulging in fraudulent diversion of funds to sister
concerns.
This order which was based upon the criminal complaint filed by the SFIO under section
212(15), showed that the role ascribed to the petitioner was that of being an ‘officer
who was in default’ within the meaning of section 2(60), since the petitioner was a
director of the company and was liable for the affairs of the company under section
212(14).
It was held that since there was no allegation against petitioner either intimidating any
witnesses or tampering with evidence or otherwise interfering in course of investigation,
she was to be admitted to regular bail.
CASE LAW
In Re Usha Martin Telematics Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companies C.R.R. 494 OF 2019, High
Court Of Calcutta, the petitioner company applied to Reserve Bank of India for being
registered as Core Investment Company (CIC) pursuant to Core Investment Companies
(Reserve Bank) Directions, 2011 following which Reserve Bank of India sought certain
clarifications and documents from petitioner company.
A complaint case was filed by opposite party before Special Court, for offence
punishable under section 118, read with section 448.
It was held that the typographical/inadvertent error in recording of minutes which was
rectified subsequently could under no stretch of imagination be termed as an offence,
far less an offence under provisions of Companies Act as alleged. The complaint lodged
by opposite party did not prima facie reflect intent to deceive, gain undue advantage
or injure interest of company or any person connected thereto on part of petitioners
and, therefore, proceeding in respect of complaint case was liable to be quashed.
• upon any examination on oath or solemn affirmation, authorized under this Act;
or
• in any affidavit, deposition or solemn affirmation, in or about the winding up of
any company under this Act, or otherwise in or about any matter arising under
this Act,
he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than three
years but which may extend to seven years and with fine which may extend to Rs. 10
Lakhs.
If a company or any officer of a company • the company and every officer of the
or any other person contravenes any of the company who is in default or such
provisions of this Act or the rules made other person shall be liable to a penalty
thereunder, or any condition, limitation or of Rs. 10,000, and
restriction subject to which any approval,
• in case of continuing contravention,
sanction, consent, confirmation,
with a further penalty of Rs. 1000 for
recognition, direction or exemption in
each day after the first during which
relation to any matter has been accorded,
the contravention continues, subject to
given or granted, and for which no penalty
a maximum of Rs. 2 Lakhs in case of a
or punishment is provided elsewhere in
company and Rs. 50,000 in case of an
this Act:
officer who is in default or any other
person.
CASE LAW
In Re Doha Brokerage & Financial Services Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companies C.P. NO. 13
(KOB) OF 2020 National Company Law Tribunal, Kochi Bench, it was held that the
petitioner sought compounding of offence punishable under section 450, wherein
petitioner-company allotted equity shares to its subsidiary company in violation of
section 19 (Subsidiary Company not to Hold Shares in its Holding Company), each
officer in default as members of Board of Directors was to be subjected to a fine of Rs.
5000 as a deterrent for not repeating default in future and offence was ordered to be
compounded subject to remittance of compounding fee imposed.
CASE LAW
In Re Pahuja Takii Seed Ltd. Vs. Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana
Company Appeal (AT) NOS. 80 TO 83 OF 2018 National Company Law Appellate
Tribunal, New Delhi, in this matter it was held that there is no bar on preferring a single
application for compounding same offence committed during different financial years
by company and its officers.
Punishable with fine which shall not be less than Rs. 500 but may extend to Rs. 2000 for
every day for which that name or title has been used.
continues, subject to a
maximum of Rs. 5 Lakhs
in the case of a company
and Rs. 2 Lakhs in case
of an officer who is in
default.
• in the case of a
continuing default, with
a further fine which may
extend to Rs.5000 for
every day during which
such default continues.
Section 137(3)- Copy If a company fails to file the • The company shall be
of Financial Statement copy of the financial liable to a penalty of
to statements under sub- Rs.10,000 and in case of
be Filed with Registrar section (1) or sub-section (2), continuing failure, with a
as the case may be, before further penalty of Rs.100
the expiry of the period for each day during
specified therein which such failure
continues, subject to a
maximum of Rs.2 Lakhs;
and
• The managing director
and the Chief Financial
Officer of the company,
if any, and, in the
absence of the
managing director and
the Chief Financial
Officer, any other
director who is charged
by the Board with the
responsibility of
complying with the
provisions of this section,
and, in the absence of
any such director, all the
directors of the
company, shall be liable
to a penalty of Rs.10,000
and in case of continuing
failure, with further
penalty of Rs.100 for
each day after the first
during which such failure
continues, subject to a
maximum of Rs.50,000.
continues subject to a
maximum of Rs. 1 Lakh.
Section 403- Fee for Where a company fails or • the company and the
Filing, etc. commits any default to officers of the company
submit, file, register or who are in default, shall,
record any document, fact or without prejudice to the
information under sub- liability for the payment of
section (1) before the expiry fee and additional fee, be
of the period specified in the liable for the penalty or
relevant section punishment provided
under this Act for such
failure or default.
Section 405(4)-Power If any company fails to • the company and every
of Central comply with an order made officer of the company
Government to Direct under sub-section (1) or sub- who is in default shall be
Companies to Furnish section (3), or furnishes any liable to a penalty of Rs.
Information or information or statistics 20,000 and in case of
Statistics.
which is incorrect or continuing failure, with a
incomplete in any material further penalty of Rs. 1000
respect for each day after the first
during which such failure
continues, subject to a
maximum of Rs. 3 Lakhs.
Section 446B-Penalty if penalty is payable for non- • such company, its officer
for small company compliance of any of the in default or any other
and OPC provisions of this Act by a person, as the case may
One Person Company, small be, shall be liable to a
company, start-up company penalty which shall not be
or Producer Company, or by more than one-half of the
any of its officer in default, penalty specified in such
or any other person in provisions subject to a
respect of such company, maximum of Rs. 2 Lakhs in
then case of a company and Rs.
1 Lakh in case of an officer
Section 435(1) stipulates that the Central Government may, for the purpose of providing
speedy trial of offences under this Companies Act, 2013 by notification establish or
designate as many Special Courts as may be necessary.
CASE LAW
In Re S. Satyanarayana Vs. Energo Masch Power Engineering & Consulting (P.) Ltd.
Criminal Appeal Nos. 516 - 518 Of 2010, Supreme Court of India, In this case it was held
that even if a number of persons are accused of offences under a special enactment
such as Companies Act and as also IPC in respect of same transaction or facts and even
if some could not be tried under special enactment, it is Special Court alone which
would have jurisdiction to try all offences based on same transaction to avoid
multiplicity of proceedings.
Here, the Special Court shall be deemed to be a Court of Session or the court of
Metropolitan Magistrate or a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, as the case may be
and the person conducting a prosecution before a Special Court shall be deemed to be
a Public Prosecutor.
ADJUDICATION OF OFFENCES
As per Ramanathan’s Law Lexicon “Adjudication” is the determination of matters in
dispute by the decision of a competent Court, arbitration of the determination of such
matters by the decision of arbitrators, whose decision may not be binding until confirmed
by a higher Court or assented to by the parties.
• Before adjudging penalty, the adjudging officer shall issue a written notice to the
company, the officer who is in default to show cause, within thirty days from the
date of service
• Every notice issued, shall clearly indicate the nature of non-compliance or default
• The reply to such notice shall be filed in electronic mode only within the period
as specified in the notice:
Provided that the adjudicating officer may, for reasons to be recorded in writing, extend
the period referred to above by a further period not exceeding fifteen days
• If, after considering the reply submitted by such company, its officer, or any other
person, as the case may be, the adjudicating officer is of the opinion that physical
appearance is required, he shall issue a notice, within a period of ten working days
from the date of receipt of reply fixing a date for the appearance
• If oral representation is requested for, the adjudicating officer shall allow such
person to make such representation after fixing a date of appearance.
MCACMS Portal by Ministry of Corporate Affairs is for issuing show cause notices
electronically for non compliances under Companies Act, 2013 and submitting replies
from companies / directors with their clarifications and submissions. Based on the replies
/ submissions, the Register of Companies, Ministry of Corporate Affairs shall initiate penal
actions for violations referred in the show cause notices.
3. Click the relevant section for which SCN has been issued;
4. Fill the CMS Reference number written on the SCN & click search. The system will
7. Click on ‘Submit Reply’ tab and reply once submitted cannot be altered;
8. The system will show a confirmation message and the ‘Action’ tab will show reply
status.
• On the date fixed for hearing, pass any order in writing as he thinks fit including as
order for adjournment:
• Further, after hearing, adjudicating officer may require the concerned person to
submit his reply in writing on certain other issues related to the notice, relevant for
determination of the default.
• The adjudicating officer shall pass an order within ninety days of the date of issue
of notice
• In case an order is passed after the aforementioned duration, the reasons of the
delay shall be recorded by the adjudicating officer and no such order shall be
invalid merely because of its passing after the expiry of ninety days
• Every order of the adjudicating officer shall be duly dated and signed by him and
shall clearly state the reasons for requiring the physical appearance.
• The adjudicating officer shall send a copy of the order passed by him to the
concerned company, officer who is in default.
a) to summon and enforce the attendance of any person acquainted with the facts
and circumstances of the case after recording reasons in writing;
b) to order for evidence or to produce any document, which in the opinion of the
adjudicating officer, may be relevant to the subject matter.
(b) direct such company, or officer who is in default, or any other person, as the
case may be, to
• If any person fails to reply or neglects or refuses to appear as required before the
adjudicating officer, the adjudicating officer may pass an order imposing the
penalty, in the absence of such person after recording the reasons for doing so.
• While adjudging quantum of penalty, the adjudicating officer shall have due
regard to the following factors, namely:-
a) size of the company;
Provided that, in no case, the penalty imposed shall be less than the minimum penalty
prescribed, if any, under the relevant section of the Act.
• All sums realized by way of penalties under the Act shall be credited to the
Consolidated Fund of India.
• Any person aggrieved by an order made by the adjudicating officer may prefer an
appeal to the Regional Director having jurisdiction in the matter.
• Every appeal against the order of the adjudicating officer shall be filed in writing
with the Regional Director having jurisdiction in the matter within a period of sixty
days from the date of receipt of the order
• Further that an appeal in Form ADJ shall not seek relief(s) therein against more
than one order
• If the appellant fails to rectify the defects: The Regional Director may by order
and for reasons to be recorded in writing, decline to register such appeal and
communicate such refusal to the appellant within a period of seven days thereof.
• Intimation of Date of Hearing by RD: The Regional Director shall notify the
parties, the date of hearing of the appeal which shall not be a date earlier than
thirty days following the date of such notification for hearing of the appeal.
• Hearing by RD: On the date fixed for hearing the Regional Director may, subject
to the reasons to be recorded in writing, pass any order as he thinks fit including
an order for adjournment of the hearing to a future date.
• Ex-parte hearing: In case the appellant or the adjudicating officer does not appear
on the date fixed for hearing, the Regional Director may dispose of the appeal ex-
parte.
• Setting aside ex-parte order: Where the appellant appears afterwards and
satisfies the Regional Director that there was sufficient cause for his non-
appearance, the Regional Director may make an order setting aside the ex-parte
order and restore the appeal.
• Order: The Regional Director may, after giving the parties to the appeal an
opportunity of being heard, pass such order as he thinks fit, confirming, modifying
or setting aside the order appealed against.
• Signing of Order: Every order passed under this rule shall be dated and signed by
the Regional Director.
• Fine: Where company fails to comply with the order, the company shall be
punishable with fine which shall not be less than twenty-five thousand rupees but
which may extend to five lakh rupees.
An order was passed by the adjudicating authority under Section 454 of Companies Act,
2013 read with Rule 3 of the Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) rule 2014 for violation
of Section 12 of the Companies Act, 2013.
As per Section 12(2) of Companies Act, 2013 the company, as soon as it is incorporated,
shall furnish to the registrar the verification of registered office within thirty days in Form
INC-22. But the company filed the form after the three years that’s on January 1, 2019.
The company and its officers in default had admitted that they have violated the provision
of Section 12(2) of Companies Act, 2013. The adjudicating authority issued a notice to the
company and its officers in default to appear before the authority along with their
representatives before September 5, 2019, in the chamber of a registrar of the company.
The authorised representative was present on said date but the notice was not signed by
all the directors. According to Section 12(8) of Companies act, 2013, if a company and
officer in default contravenes the provisions of Section 12 of Companies Act, 2013 shall
be liable to pay a penalty of INR 1000 for every day during which the default continues
but it shall not exceed INR 1 lakh.
Order
The company and its officers in default are liable to pay INR 1 lakh each. As per Section
454(1) and (3) of Companies Act, 2013 and considering the delay of 621 days they have
imposed of a penalty of INR 1 lakh on the company and its directors and are required to
pay the amount on MCA portal and proof of payment to be produced within thirty days
from the date of receipt of order. An appeal shall be filed as per Section 454(1) and (3) of
Companies Act, 2013 to the regional director within sixty days from the date of order of
adjudicating authority and it shall be submitted in the prescribed form and with
prescribed fees.
Order
The Company and its officers in default were called upon along with the representatives
to present before the registrar of companies. But none of them was present on the said
date. The adjudicating authority under section 454(3) of Companies act, 2013 issued a
penalty of INR 1 lakh to each director and the company and were required to pay the
amount on MCA portal and proof of payment to be produced within thirty days from the
date of receipt of order.
In case a company does not pay the penalty within ninety days as specified under section
454(8) of Companies Act, 2013 the company shall be liable to pay a fine which shall not
be less than INR 25 thousand but may extend to INR 5 lakhs. An officer in default or any
other person is in default shall be punishable with imprisonment which may extend to six
months or with a fine which shall not be less than INR 25,000 but which may extend to
INR 1 lakh or with both.
Order for Penalty under Section 454 for violation of Section 173 of the Companies
Act, 2013 In The Matter Of Narangs International Hotels Private Limited
As per the application and records of this office, it is noticed that the Company has failed
to hold a minimum number of four meetings of its Board of Directors every year in such
a manner that not more than one hundred and twenty days shall intervene between two
consecutive meetings of the Board during the financial year ended 2020-21. Further, the
MCA vide circular dated 24.03.2020 extended the number of days to 180 days. However,
the number of days between the two consecutive meetings of the Board of Directors, i.e.
between 13.12.2019 and 11.09.2020 was 273 days which is 93 days more than the
prescribed 180 days accordingly, there was contravention of Section 173 of the
Companies Act, 2013. The delay in days is calculated from 10.06.2020 instead of
13.12.2019 till 11.09.2020 as per extension of 180 days by the Ministry. Thus, there was a
delay of 943 days in conducting the Board Meeting.
With regard to the above factors to be considered while determining the quantum of
penalty, it is noted that the disproportionate gain or unfair advantage made by the
Noticee or loss caused to the investor as a result of the delay on the part of the Noticee
to redress the investor grievance are not available on record.
Further, it may also be added that it is difficult to quantify the unfair advantage made by
the Noticee or the loss caused to the investors in a default of this nature.
Order
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and after taking into account
the factors above, penalty of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only} on each of
its Directors for violation of provisions of Section 173 of the Companies Act, 2013 was
imposed.
Order for Penalty for Violation of section 39(4) of the Companies Act, 2013 R/w Rule
12(1) of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014. In The
Matter of Sunshakti Solar Power Projects Private Limited
The company and its director(s) have suo-moto filed application vide e-form GNL-1 dated
19.11.2021 for compounding of offence under the provisions of section 441 of the
Companies Act, 2013, however, as the matter was dealt with adjudication under section
454 of the Act, the subject company submitted a letter to this office dated 12.04.2022 and
made request to treat the said e-form GNL-1 as filed for adjudication, The petition
submitted by company stated as under:- During the financial year ended 31.03.2018, the
company issued 37,500, 10% Compulsorily Convertible Debentures with face value of Rs,
10,000/- each amounting to Rs, 37,50,00,000 on Private Placement basis, pursuant to
section 62 and section 42 r/w Companies (Prospectus and allotment of securities) Rules
2014 of the Act details of which are as under:
The company approved the issuance of 37,500 10% Compulsorily Convertible Debentures
by passing special resolution in its Annual General Meeting held on 30.09.2017 and Letter
of offer in form PAS-4 was circulated to the offeree accordingly. The company allotted the
CCDs to allottess namely Skypower Southeast Asia Il Investment Limited vide dated
06.01.2018 after receiving subscription money in its escrow account. The necessary e-form
PAS:3 (Return of Allotment} for allotment of 37,5000 10% Compulsorily Convertible
Debentures was filed on 31.03.2018. Further, the company and officers in default
submitted their reply on 20th June 2022 in response to the show cause notice issued by
this office.
The default in the instant case was related to the delay in filing of Return of allotment
(Form PAS-3) and Letter of offer (in PAS-4) by 69 days and 151 days respectively. The
authorized representative submitted that the company will submit written submission
regarding delay filing of Letter of offer (in Form PAS-4) within 7 days from the date hereof.
The default regarding aforésaid forms has been made good by the company. However,
the delay in filing of PAS-3 has been admitted.
Further, company submitted written submission wherein stated that delay in filing of PAS-
4 by 151 days was unintentional and also request to grant relief pursuant to Rule 13 of
the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 in filing of offer letter in form
PAS-4 by delay of 151 days.
Adjudication of penalty
In the instant case, the default relating to late filing of return of allotment was not subject
of penalty under section 42 (10) of the Act as on the date of the default. As default relating
to delay in allotment of securities was not recovered within such provision, this default
will instead lead to penalty under section 39(5) for violation of section 39 (4) r/w Rule
12(1) of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014.
Now in exercise of the powers conferred and having considered the reply submitted by
the noticee(s) in response to the notice(s) issued to company, Regional Director hereby
imposed the penalty on the company and its officers in default for violation of section 39
(4) r/e Rule 12(1) of Companies (Prospectus and Allotment of Securities) Rules 2014.
SEBI or its Adjudicating through the courts and the Settlement of the
Officers. follow up to obtain Specified Proceedings that
While undertaking defence conviction. have been initiated or may
representation in The Division will also frame be initiated by SEBI.
contentious matters procedures for cooperation Settlement Applications
involving complex issues of with public prosecutors, are processed as per SEBI
law, the Division would other agencies and for (Settlement of
liase with Senior making referrals to Administrative and Civil
Advocates, law firms, prosecutors and other Proceedings) Regulations,
solicitors firms and government agencies. 2014 [Settlement
represent the interest of Regulations] and if
SEBI at Securities Appellate settlement is arrived at, the
Tribunal (SAT). Settlement Orders are
The Division would also be passed.
an interface between SEBI Responsible for handling
and SAT, while Registration of Settlement
collaborating with other Application, Calculation of
departments of SEBI. Settlement amount as per
It would also assist SEBI in the Settlement
filing affidavits/written Regulations, organizing
submissions, as and when Internal Committee
needed, while attending Meeting between the
hearings. Applicants and Internal
Committee Members for
formulating the settlement
amount/terms, Organizing
High Powered Advisory
Committee (HPAC)
Meeting, placing the
recommendation before
Whole Time Members for
approval.
Section 11B of the Act provides that if the SEBI is satisfied after making or causing to be
made an enquiry, that it is necessary:
As per Section 15A of the SEBI Act, 1992, A, if any person, who is required under this Act
or any rules or regulations made thereunder,—
a) to furnish any document, return or report to the Board, fails to furnish the same or
who furnishes or files false, incorrect or incomplete information, return, report,
books or other documents, he shall be liable to a penalty which shall not be less
than one lakh rupees but which may extend to one lakh rupees for each day during
which such failure continues subject to a maximum of one crore rupees;
b) to file any return or furnish any information, books or other documents within the
time specified therefor in the regulations, fails to file return or furnish the same
within the time specified therefor in the regulations or who furnishes or files false,
incorrect or incomplete information, return, report, books or other documents, he
shall be liable to a penalty which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which
may extend to one lakh rupees for each day during which such failure continues
subject to a maximum of one crore rupees;
extend to one lakh rupees for each day during which such failure continues subject
to a maximum of one crore rupees.
Penalty for failure by any person to enter into agreement with clients.
As per Section 15B of the SEBI Act, 1992, if any person, who is registered as an
intermediary and is required under this Act or any rules or regulations made thereunder
to enter into an agreement with his client, fails to enter into such agreement, he shall be
liable to a penalty which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to
one lakh rupees for each day during which such failure continues subject to a maximum
of one crore rupees.
b) fails to deliver any security or fails to make payment of the amount due to the
investor in the manner within the period specified in the regulations- 1 lac to 1 cr
(if default continues)
As per Section 15G of the SEBI Act, 1992, if any insider who,—
(i) either on his own behalf or on behalf of any other person, deals in securities of
a body corporate listed on any stock exchange on the basis of any unpublished
price-sensitive information; or
(iii) counsels, or procures for any other person to deal in any securities of any body
corporate on the basis of unpublished price-sensitive information, shall be
liable to a penalty which shall not be less than ten lakh rupees but which may
extend to twenty-five crore rupees or three times the amount of profits made
out of insider trading, whichever is higher.
As per Section 15H of the SEBI Act, 1992, if any person, who is required under this Act or
any rules or regulations made thereunder, fails to,—
(i) disclose the aggregate of his shareholding in the body corporate before he
acquires any shares of that body corporate; or
(iii) make a public offer by sending letter of offer to the shareholders of the concerned
company; or
(iv) make payment of consideration to the shareholders who sold their shares pursuant
to letter of offer, he shall be liable to a penalty which shall not be less than ten lakh
rupees but which may extend to twenty-five crore rupees or three times the
amount of profits made out of such failure, whichever is higher.
Penalty for alteration, destruction, etc., of records and failure to protect the
electronic database of Board.
As per Section 15HAA of the SEBI Act, 1992, any person, who—
a) knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, falsifies, or makes a false entry in
any information, record, document (including electronic records), which is required
under this Act or any rules or regulations made thereunder, so as to impede,
obstruct, or influence the investigation, inquiry, audit, inspection or proper
administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of the Board.
d) knowingly introduces any computer virus or other computer contaminant into the
system database and brings out a trading halt;
While adjudging quantum of penalty under 15-I or section 11 or section 11B, the Board
or the adjudicating officer shall have due regard to the following factors, namely :—
a) the amount of disproportionate gain or unfair advantage, wherever quantifiable,
made as a result of the default;
• The settlement proceedings under this section shall be conducted in accordance with
the procedure specified in the regulations made under this Act.
• No appeal shall lie under section 15T against any order passed by the Board or
adjudicating officer, as the case may be, under this section.
• All settlement amounts, excluding the disgorgement amount and legal costs, realised
under this Act shall be credited to the Consolidated Fund of India.
CASE STUDY
Ignorance of law is not an excuse for escaping from liability of violation of law
The Appellant, Mega Resources Limited, is aggrieved by the order dated 13.08.2014
passed by the Adjudicating Officer, SEBI imposing a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000/- under
Section 15A(b) of the SEBI Act and Rs. 50,00,000/- under Section 15 H(ii) of the SEBI Act
for failure on the part of the appellant to comply with the provisions of Regulation 7(1)
read with Regulation 7(2) and Regulation 11(1) read with Regulation 14(1) of the SEBI
(Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997.
The appellant has admitted that pursuant to the acquisition of 25000 equity shares
through off-market transactions the shareholding of the Promoters/Promoter Group of
the Company had increased from 50.46% to 60.46% of the Target Company. This
triggered Regulation 11(1) of the erstwhile SAST Regulations along with the
requirement of submission of certain disclosures under Regulation 7(1) and 7(2) of the
erstwhile Regulations. It is admitted by the appellant that the non-compliance with the
disclosure requirements in respect of acquisition of shares and failure to make an open
offer to the shareholders of the Company was due to lack of awareness of the erstwhile
regulations on the part of the Appellant and purely unintentional and without any
malafide intentions.
However, it is trite law that ignorance of law will not excuse the appellant to escape the
liability of violating the law nor ever absolve the wrongdoer of his crime or misconduct.
Further, the appellant contended that in the matter of imposition of penalty, the Section
15(H)(ii) of the SEBI Act, 1992 was amended dated October 29, 2002 and the penalty
for non-disclosure of acquisition of shares and takeovers was enhanced from a
maximum of Rs.5 lakh to Rs.25 crore. It is argued that since the violation in Appeal was
committed in February, 2001, the appellant would be governed by the erstwhile
provisions of Section 15H(ii) of the SEBI Act, which existed on the date of violation in
question.
Decision
It is true that the maximum monetary penalty imposable for non-disclosure of
acquisition of shares and takeovers under the erstwhile SEBI Act on the date of violation
by the Appellant was Rs. 5 Lakh and by the amendment dated October 29, 2002 it is up
to Rs. 25 Crore or three times of the amount of profits made out of such failure,
whichever is higher. However, the moot point in this connection to be noted is that as
on October 29, 2002 the obligation to make disclosure and public announcement under
Regulations 7(1) read with 7(2) and 11(1) read with 14(1) continued. Therefore, because
the violation was continued even after October 29, 2002, the appellant has been rightly
imposed penalty under the amended provisions of Section 15H(ii) of the SEBI Act. Since
the punishment imposable now for such non-disclosure and public announcement is
up to Rs. 25 Crore, SAT finds that the penalty of Rs. 50 Lakh is just and reasonable and
not disproportionate. The contention of the appellant in this regard is, therefore, liable
to be turned down. Therefore, in the peculiarity of the facts and circumstances of the
case and, in particular, the continuity of the obligation to make disclosure and public
announcement, the penalty of Rs. 50 lakh is upheld and the appeal is dismissed.
d) enters into any contract in derivative in contravention of section 18A or the rules
made under section 30;
e) owns or keeps a place other than that of a recognised stock exchange which is
used for the purpose of entering into or performing any contracts in contravention
of any of the provisions of this Act and knowingly permits such place to be used
for such purposes; or
f) manages, controls, or assists in keeping any place other than that of a recognised
stock exchange which is used for the purpose of entering into or performing any
contracts in contravention of any of the provisions of this Act or at which contracts
are recorded or adjusted or rights or liabilities arising out of contracts are adjusted,
regulated or enforced in any manner whatsoever; or
h) joins, gathers or assists in gathering at any place other than the place of business
specified in the bye-laws of a recognised stock exchange any person or persons
for making bids or offers or for entering into or performing any contracts in
contravention of any of the provisions of this Act;
shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to ten years or with
fine, which may extend to twenty-five crore rupees, or with both.
Penalty for failure by any person to enter into an agreement with clients.[Section
23B]
1 lac to 1 cr (if default continues)
Penalty for failure to conduct business in accordance with rules, etc. [Section 23GA]
Where a stock exchange or a clearing corporation fails to conduct its business with its
members or any issuer or its agent or any person associated with the securities markets
in accordance with the rules or regulations made by the Securities and Exchange Board
of India and the directions issued by it under this Act, the stock exchange or the clearing
corporations, as the case may be, shall be liable to penalty which shall not be less than
five crore rupees but which may extend to twenty-five crore rupees or three times
the amount of gains made out of such failure, whichever is higher.
Factors to be taken into account while adjudging quantum of penalty. [Section 23J].
While adjudging the quantum of penalty under section 12A or section 23-I, the Securities
and Exchange Board of India or the adjudicating officer shall have due regard to the
following factors, namely:—
a) the amount of disproportionate gain or unfair advantage, wherever quantifiable,
made as a result of the default;
e) appointing a receiver for the management of the person’s movable and immovable
properties,
• Any person aggrieved, by the order or decision of the recognized stock exchange
or the adjudicating officer or any order made by the Securities and Exchange Board
of India under or sub-section (3) of section 23-I, may prefer an appeal before the
Securities Appellate Tribunal and the provisions of sections 22B, 22C, 22D and 22E
of this Act, shall apply, as far as may be, to such appeals.
• Every appeal made above shall be filed within a period of forty-five days from the
date on which a copy of the order or decision is received by the appellant and it
shall be in such form and be accompanied by such fee as may be prescribed:
• Provided that the Securities Appellate Tribunal may entertain an appeal after the
expiry of the said period of forty-five days if it is satisfied that there was sufficient
cause for not filing it within that period.
• The Securities Appellate Tribunal shall send a copy of every order made by it to the
parties to the appeal and to the concerned adjudicating officer.
• The appeal filed before the Securities Appellate Tribunal under sub-section (1) shall
be dealt with by it as expeditiously as possible and endeavour shall be made by it
to dispose of the appeal finally within six months from the date of receipt of the
appeal.
The Securities Contracts (Regulation) (Procedure for Holding Inquiry and Imposing
Penalties) Rules, 2005.
2. Content of Notice: Every notice under sub-rule (1) to any such person shall
indicate the nature of offence alleged to have been committed by him.
3. Date of Appearance: If, after considering the cause, if any, shown by such person,
the Board or the adjudicating officer is of the opinion that an inquiry should be
held, he shall issue a notice fixing a date for the appearance of that person either
personally or through his lawyer or other authorised representative.
4. Personal Hearing: On the date fixed, the Board or the adjudicating officer shall
explain to the person proceeded against or his lawyer or authorised representative,
the offence, alleged to have been committed by such person indicating the
provisions of the Act, rules or regulations in respect of which contravention is
alleged to have taken place.
6. Enforcement of Attendance: While holding an inquiry under this rule the Board
or the adjudicating officer shall have the power to summon and enforce the
attendance of any person acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case
to give evidence or to produce any document which, in the opinion of the Board
or the adjudicating officer, may be useful for or relevant to, the subject-matter of
the inquiry.
d) Content of Order: Every order made under sub-rule (1) shall specify the provisions
of the Act in respect of which default has taken place and shall contain brief reasons
for such decisions.
e) Date & Sign: Every such order shall be dated and signed by the Board or the
adjudicating officer.
f) Rectification of Error: The Board or the adjudicating officer who has passed an
order, may rectify any error apparent on the face of record on such order, either
on its own motion or where such error is brought to his notice by the affected
person within a period of fifteen days from the date of such order.
1) A notice or an order issued under these rules shall be served on the person through
any of the following modes, namely:–
a) by delivering or tendering it to that person or his duly authorised agent;
o
b) by sending it to the person by fax or electronic mail or electronic instant
messaging services along with electronic mail or by courier or speed post
or registered post:
The courier or speed post or registered post shall be sent to the address
of his place of residence or his last known place of residence or the place
where he carried on, or last carried on, business or personally works, or
last worked, for gain, with acknowledgment due:
A notice sent by fax shall bear a note that the same is being sent by fax
and in case the document contains annexure, the number of pages being
sent shall also be mentioned:
A notice sent through electronic mail or electronic instant messaging
services along with electronic mail shall be digitally signed by the
competent authority and bouncing of the electronic mail shall not
constitute valid service.
2) In case of failure to serve a notice or an order through any one of the modes
provided under sub- rule (1), the notice or order may be affixed on the outer door
or some other conspicuous part of the premises in which the person resides or is
known to have last resided, or carried on business or personally works, or last
worked, for gain and a written report thereof shall be prepared in the presence of
two witnesses.
3) In case of failure to affix the notice or order on the outer door as provided under
sub-rule (2), the notice or order shall be published in at least two newspapers, one
of which shall be in an English daily newspaper having nationwide circulation and
another shall be in a newspaper having wide circulation published in the language
of the region where that person was last known to have resided or carried on
business or personally worked for gain.
• If any person is found to have acquired any foreign exchange, foreign security or
immovable property, situated outside India, of the aggregate value exceeding the
threshold he shall be liable to a penalty up to three times the sum involved in such
contravention and confiscation of the value equivalent, situated in India, the
Foreign exchange, foreign security or immovable property
• Subject to the provisions of section 19(2), if any person fails to make full payment
of the penalty imposed on him under section 13 within a period of ninety days
from the date on which the notice for payment of such penalty is served on him,
he shall be liable to civil imprisonment under this section.
• Order for the arrest and detention in civil prison of a defaulter shall be made if the
Adjudicating Authority, for reasons in writing, is satisfied –
a) that the defaulter, with the object or effect of obstructing the recovery of
penalty, has after the issue of notice by the Adjudicating Authority,
dishonestly transferred, concealed, or removed any part of his property,
or
b) that the defaulter has, or has had since the issuing of notice by the
Adjudicating Authority, the means to pay the arrears or some substantial
part thereof and refuses or neglects or has refused or neglected to pay
the same.
• defaulter is likely to abscond or leave the local limits of the jurisdiction of the
Adjudicating Authority.
• Where appearance is not made pursuant to a notice issued and served under sub-
section (1), the Adjudicating Authority may issue a warrant for the arrest of the
defaulter.
• Every person arrested in pursuance of a warrant of arrest under this section shall
be brought before the Adjudicating Authority issuing the warrant as soon as
practicable and in any event within twenty- four hours of his arrest (exclusive of
the time required for the journey):
• Pending the conclusion of the inquiry, the Adjudicating Authority may, in his
discretion, order the defaulter to be detained in the custody of such officer as the
Adjudicating Authority may think fit or release him on bail
• Every person detained in the civil prison in execution of the certificate may be so
detained,–
(a) where the certificate is for a demand of an amount exceeding rupees one crore,
up to three
years, and.
(b) in any other case, up to six months:
• Provided that he shall be released from such detention on the amount mentioned
in the warrant for his detention being paid to the officer-in-charge of the civil
prison.
• A defaulter released from detention under this section shall not, merely by reason
of his release, be discharged from his liability for the arrears, but he shall not be
liable to be arrested under the certificate in execution of which he was detained in
the civil prison.
• A detention order may be executed at any place in India in the manner provided
for the execution of warrant of arrest under the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
• Every appeal under sub-section (1) shall be filed within forty-five days from the
date on which the copy of the order made by the Adjudicating Authority
• On receipt of an appeal, the Special Director (Appeals) may after giving the parties
to the appeal an opportunity of being heard, pass such order thereon as he thinks
fit, confirming, modifying or setting aside the order appealed against.
• The Special Director (Appeals) shall send a copy of every order made by him to the
parties to appeal and to the concerned Adjudicating Authority.
• The Special Director (Appeals) shall have the same powers of a civil court which are
conferred on the Appellate Tribunal under sub-section (2) of section 28 and –
(a) all proceedings before him shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings
within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code ;
(b) shall be deemed to be a civil court for the purposes of sections 345 and
346 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 197)
While filing the appeal, the applicant shall deposit the amount of such penalty with
such authority as may be notified by the Central Government:
• Every appeal shall be filed within a period of forty-five days from the date on which
a copy of the order made by the Adjudicating Authority
• On receipt of an appeal under sub-section (1), the Appellate Tribunal may, after
giving the parties to the appeal an opportunity of being heard, pass such orders
thereon as it thinks fit, confirming, modifying or setting aside the order appealed
against.
• The Appellate Tribunal shall send a copy of every order made by it to the parties
to the appeal and to the concerned Adjudicating Authority or the Special Director
(Appeals), as the case may be.
Procedure and powers of Appellate Tribunal and Special Director (Appeals) (Section
28)
a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on
oath;
b) requiring the discovery and production of documents;
c) receiving evidence on affidavits;
d) subject to the provisions of sections 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
(1 of 1872); requisitioning any public record or document or copy of such record
or document from any office;
e) issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses or documents;
f) reviewing its decisions;
g) dismissing a representation of default or deciding it ex parte;
h) setting aside any order of dismissal of any representation for default or any order
passed by it ex parte; and
• An order made by the Appellate Tribunal or the Special Director (Appeals) under
this Act shall be executable by the Appellate Tribunal or the Special Director
(Appeals) as a decree of civil court and, for this purpose, the Appellate Tribunal and
the Special Director (Appeals) shall have all the powers of a civil court.
No civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any
matter which an Adjudicating Authority or the Appellate Tribunal or the Special Director
(Appeals) is empowered to determine and no injunction shall be granted by any court or
other authority in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power
conferred by or under this Act.
2) Content of Notice- Every notice under sub-rule (1) to any such person shall
indicate the nature of contravention alleged to have been committed by him.
3) Date of Appearance- After considering the cause, if any, shown by such person,
the Adjudicating Authority is of the opinion that an inquiry should be held, he shall
issue a notice fixing a date for the appearance of that person either personally or
through his legal practitioner or a chartered accountant duly authorised by him.
4) Personal Hearing- On the date fixed, the Adjudicating Authority shall explain to
the person proceeded against or his legal practitioner or the chartered accountant,
as the case may be, the contravention, allowed to have been committed by such
person indicating the provisions of the Act or of rules, regulations, notifications,
directions or orders or any condition subject to which an authorisation is issued by
the Reserve Bank of India in respect of which contravention is alleged to have taken
place.
a future date and in taking such evidence the Adjudicating Authority shall not be
bound to observe the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872
7) If any person fails, neglects or refuses to appear as required by sub-rule (3) before
the Adjudicating Authority, the Adjudicating Authority may proceed with the
adjudication proceedings in the absence of such person after recording the
reasons for doing so.
9) Every order made under sub-rule (8) of the rule 4 shall specify the provisions of the
Act or of the rules, regulations, notifications, directions or orders or any condition
subject to which an authorisation is issued by the Reserve Bank of India in respect
of which contravention has taken place and shall contain reasons for such
decisions.
10) Every order shall be dated and signed by the Adjudicating Authority.
11) A copy of the order made under sub-rule (8) of rule 4 shall be supplied free of
charge to the person against whom the order is made and all other copies of
proceedings shall be supplied to him on payment of copying fee @ Rs. 2 per page.
1) On receipt of an appeal, the Special Director (Appeals) shall send a copy of the
appeal, together with a copy of the order appealed against, to the Director of
Enforcement.
2) The Special Director (Appeals) shall, then, issue notices to the applicant and the
Director of Enforcement fixing a date for hearing of the appeal.
3) On the date fixed for hearing of the appeal or any other day to which the hearing
of the appeal may be adjourned, the applicant as well as the presenting officer of
the Directorate of Enforcement shall be heard.
4) Where on the date fixed, or any other day to which the hearing of the appeal may
be adjourned, the applicant or the presenting officer fail to appeal when the appeal
is called for hearing, the Special Director (Appeals) may decide the appeal on the
merits of the case within one hundred and eighty days from the date of such
appeal.
2) The appeal shall set forth concisely and under distinct head the grounds of
objection to the order appealed against without any argument of narrative and
such grounds shall be numbered consecutively;
appeal is called on for hearing, the Appellate Tribunal may decide the appeal on
the merits of the case.
2) The order referred to shall be signed by the Chairman or Member of the Appellate
Tribunal hearing the appeal.
c) by affixing it on the outer door or some other conspicuous part of the premises in
which the person resides or is known to have last resided or carried on business or
personally works or has worked for gain and that written report thereof should be
witnesses by two persons, or
d) if the notice or requisition or order cannot be served under clause (a) or clause (b)
or clause (c), by publishing in a leading newspaper (both in vernacular and in
English) having wide circulation or area or jurisdiction in which the person resides
or is known to have last resided or carried on business or personally works or last
worked for gain.
Differences between Section 441 and Section 454 under the Companies Act, 2013
When there is a provision for compounding u/s 441 how does section 454 come into
play? Does Section 454 override Section 441 since it is a later section? Or do both
sections play parallelly? Which section prevails?
Both these sections are independent of each other. The question of one section overriding
the other does not arise, as they operate concurrently. The Regional Director cannot set
the compounding process in motion u/s 441 and simultaneously the ROC cannot order
adjudication u/s. 454.
Section 441 deals with compounding and Section 454 deals with adjudication. The
adjudicating officer has no power to compound. The Regional Director alone can
compound.
If he has to authorize another officer it has to be u/s 441(1)(b) and not under 454. The
adjudicating officer u/s 454 can only adjudicate on the quantum of penalty. He has no
right to go into the merits and demerits of the default. Within the parameters set under
the sections which are under default he can wander. In fact, he can only revise the fee
upwards not downwards as can be seen from the parameters set under Rule 3(9) of the
Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014. Whereas, the Regional Director or the
NCLT can afford to give lot of concessions on the quantum of penalty depending on the
facts of the case. The power to compound vested with the Regional Director or the NCLT
is more subjective.
When a suo motto application for compounding is made, how does Section 454
come into play?
The moot question here will be, should the Regional Director or the NCLT take cognizance
of adjudication proceedings u/s 454(2) when a suo moto application made by the
defaulter for composition involving an offence, the nature of which the defaulter himself
has identified, is pending with him/NCLT for disposal and stop the adjudication
proceedings? Therefore, it appears that prima facie section 454 will not come into play.
The ROC who has forwarded the compounding application to either of them with his
report has to seek directions from the RD/NCLT in such a case. The Regional
Director/NCLT may agree for adjudication after giving justifiable reasons for his choice for
adjudication overriding the compounding application in a speaking manner. But this
decision can be challenged before the same RD under section 454(5) by the applicants to
a suo moto compounding application if the ROC, being the adjudicating officer exercises
his power u/s 454, on the grounds that the defaulting party itself has identified the non-
compliance and none else and therefore, the offence will obviously be outside the purview
of Section 454.
recommending for prosecution white-collar crimes/frauds. As per section 210 of the Act
an investigation into the affairs of a company is assigned to SFIO, where Government is
of the opinion that it is necessary to investigate into the affairs of a company –
1) on receipt of a report of the Registrar or inspector under section 208 of the
Companies Act, 2013;
2) on intimation of a special resolution passed by a company that its affairs are
required to be investigated;
3) in public interest, it may order an investigation into the affairs of the company;
4) Where an order is passed by a court or the Tribunal in any proceedings before it
that the affairs of a company ought to be investigated, the Central Government
shall order an investigation into the affairs of that company.
SFIO is headed by a Director as Head of Department in the rank of Joint Secretary to the
Government of India. The Director is assisted by Additional Directors, Joint Directors,
Deputy Directors, Senior Assistant Directors, Assistant Directors Prosecutors, and other
secretarial staff. The Headquarter of SFIO is in New Delhi, with five Regional Offices in
Mumbai, New Delhi, Chennai, Hyderabad & Kolkata.
The SFIO is headed by a Director, who shall be an office not below the rank of a Joint
Secretary to Government of India having knowledge and experience in Corporate Affairs,
and consist of expertise in the fields of investigations, cyber forensics, financial
accounting, management accounting, cost accounting and any other fields as may be
necessary for the efficient discharge of Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) functions
under the Act.
The Central Government may appoint such experts and other officers and employees in
the Serious Fraud Investigation Office as it considers necessary for the efficient discharge
of its functions under this Act.
Investigation
Section 212(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers Central Government to investigate
into the affairs of the company by SFIO.
The Central Government may, by order, assign the investigation into the affairs of the said
company to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office and its Director, may designate such
number of inspectors, as he may consider necessary for the purpose of such investigation.
Section 212(2) stipulates that, where any case has been assigned by the Central
Government to the Serious Fraud Investigation Office for investigation under this Act, no
other investigating agency of Central Government or any State Government shall proceed
with investigation in such case in respect of any offence under this Act and in case any
such investigation has already been initiated, it shall not be proceeded further with and
the concerned agency shall transfer the relevant documents and records in respect of
such offences under this Act to Serious Fraud Investigation Office.
The investigation into the affairs of a company shall be conducted in the manner and by
following the procedure specified in Chapter XIV of Companies Act, 2013. The SFIO shall
submit its report to the Central Government within the period specified in the order.
{Section 212(3)}
The Director SFIO shall cause the affairs of the company to be investigated by an
investigating officer, who shall have the powers of the Inspector under section 217 of the
Companies Act, 2013. {Section 212(4)}
It shall be the responsibility of the company, its officers and employees, who are or have
been in the employment of the company to provide all information, explanation,
documents and assistance to the investigating officer as he may require for conduct of
business. {Section 212(5)}
Section 212(6) stipulates that the offence covered under Section 447 of the Companies
Act, 2013 is a cognizable offence, and no person accused of any offence under those
sections shall be released on bail or on his own bond unless—
(i) the Public Prosecutor has been given an opportunity to oppose the application
for such release; and
(ii) where the Public Prosecutor opposes the application, the court is satisfied that
there are reasonable grounds for believing that he is not guilty of such offence
and that he is not likely to commit any offence while on bail:
Provided that a person, who, is under the age of sixteen years or is a woman or is sick or
infirm, may be released on bail, if the Special Court so directs:
Provided further that the Special Court shall not take cognizance of any offence referred
to this sub-section except upon a complaint in writing made by—
(i) the Director, Serious Fraud Investigation Office; or
(ii) any officer of the Central Government authorised, by a general or special order in
writing in this behalf by that Government.
POWER TO ARREST:
• If any officer, not below the rank of Additional Director, of SFIO has a reason to
believe that any person is guilty of any offence punishable under Section 447 of
the Companies Act, 2013 on basis of material in his possession, the office can arrest
that person and will inform him the grounds of such arrest . {Section 212(8)}
• A copy of arrest order along with the material in his possession which basis such
arrest is forwarded by the concerned officer to SFIO in a sealed envelope. {Section
212(9)}
• Every person arrested by the SFIO officer shall within twenty-four hours be taken
to Special Court or Judicial Court or Metropolitan Magistrate, as the case may be,
having appropriate jurisdiction over such matter. The period of twenty-four hours
excludes the time required for journey from place of arrest to appropriate court.
[Section 212(10)]
• The Serious Fraud Investigation shall submit an interim report, if so, directed by
the Central Government {Section 212(11)}
• On receipt of the Investigation Report, the Central Government will examine the
report and after taking legal advice, if required, may direct SFIO to initiate
proceedings against the company and its officers or employees, who are or have
been in employment of the company or any other person directly or indirectly
connected with the affairs of the company. {Section 212(14)}
• Where the report under sub-section (11) or sub-section (12) states that fraud has
taken place in a company and due to such fraud any director, key managerial
personnel, other officer of the company or any other person or entity, has taken
undue advantage or benefit, whether in the form of any asset, property or cash or
in any other manner, the Central Government may file an application before the
Tribunal for appropriate orders with regard to disgorgement of such asset,
property or cash and also for holding such director, key managerial personnel,
other officer or any other person liable personally without any limitation of liability.
{Section 212(14A)}
• It is important to note that the investigation report filed with the Special Court for
framing of charges against any person shall deemed to be a report filed by a Police
Officer under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 {Section
212(15)}
TRIBUNALS
Qualification of President and Members of Tribunal (Section 409)
• The President shall be a person who is or has been a Judge of a High Court for five
years. A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Judicial Member unless
he—
(a) is, or has been, a judge of a High Court; or
(b) is, or has been, a District Judge for at least five years; or
Explanation.—For the purposes of clause (c), in computing the period during which
a person has been an advocate of a court, there shall be included any period during
which the person has held judicial office or the office of a member of a tribunal or
any post, under the Union or a State, requiring special knowledge of law after he
become an advocate.
• A person shall not be qualified for appointment as a Technical Member unless he—
(a) has, for at least fifteen years been a member of the Indian Corporate Law
Service or Indian Legal Service and has been holding the rank of Secretary or
Additional Secretary to the Government of India; or
(b) is, or has been, in practice as a chartered accountant for at least fifteen years;
or
(c) is, or has been, in practice as a cost accountant for at least fifteen years; or
(d) is, or has been, in practice as a company secretary for at least fifteen years; or
(e) is a person of proven ability, integrity and standing having special knowledge
and professional experience of not less than fifteen years in industrial finance,
industrial management, industrial reconstruction, investment and accountancy
(f) is, or has been, for at least five years, a presiding officer of a Labour Court,
Tribunal or National Tribunal constituted under the Industrial Disputes Act,
1947.
• A Judicial Member shall be a person who is or has been a Judge of a High Court or
is a Judicial Member of the Tribunal for five years.
• The Members of the Tribunal and the Technical Members of the Appellate Tribunal
shall be appointed on the recommendation of a Selection Committee consisting
of—
(a) Chief Justice of India or his nominee—Chairperson;
(b) a senior Judge of the Supreme Court or Chief Justice of High Court—
Member;
• The Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs shall be the Convener of the Selection
Committee.
• The Selection Committee shall determine its procedure for recommending persons
under sub-section (2).
•
• A Member of the Tribunal shall hold office as such until he attains,—
a) in the case of the President, the age of sixty-seven years;
b) in the case of any other Member, the age of sixty-five years:
Provided that a person who has not completed fifty years of age shall not be eligible
for appointment as Member:
Provided further that the Member may retain his lien with his parent cadre or Ministry
or Department, as the case may be, while holding office as such for a period not
exceeding one year.
• The chairperson or a Member of the Appellate Tribunal shall hold office as such for a
term of five years from the date on which he enters upon his office, but shall be eligible
for re-appointment for another term of five years.
• A Member of the Appellate Tribunal shall hold office as such until he attains,—
(a) in the case of the Chairperson, the age of seventy years;
(b) in the case of any other Member, the age of sixty-seven years:
Provided that a person who has not completed fifty years of age shall not be eligible
for appointment as Member:
Sr.no. POWER
1. Powers of the Tribunal to give various orders for regulation or winding up of company
when the company has been incorporated by furnishing false or incorrect information
2. Powers to impose conditions for disposal surplus remaining after the winding up of a
section 8 company
preference shares
7. Power to approve the consolidation or division which changes the voting percentage of
shareholders
8. Power to pass orders as it deems fit for conversion of Government owned debentures
11. Powers of Tribunal to direct the company to pay sum due for any loss incurred by
depositor
14. Power of Tribunal to call meetings other than annual general meeting
17. Power to approve the voluntary revision of financial statements or Board’s Report
18. Powers to waive the requirement of circulation of representation of the auditor sought
to be removed
20. Power to waive the requirement of circulation of representation of the director sought
to be removed
22. Powers to approve the action against the employee during the course of investigation
by the company
23. Powers to freeze the assets of the company during inquiry and investigation
26. Sub-section (6) and (7) of Power to approve the compromise or arrangement
27. Sub-section (12) of section Powers to grant relief in case of takeover offer of
28. Sub-section (1) and (2) of Power to supervise and enforce Compromise or
29. Sub-section (1) and (3) of Powers to approve merger and amalgamation
section 232
30. Sub-section (2) of section Power to grant relief to the minority shareholders
the majority
interest
32. Sub-section (2) of section Power to hear appeal against the order of Registrar
shares
33. Sub-section (1) and (2) of Granting of relief in case of oppression and
35. Sub-section (1) of section Power to hear and pass orders for class action Suits
245
36. Sub-section (1) and (3) Power to hear appeals against removal of name
fraudulent preference
39. Sub-section (3) and (4) of Power to decide the liabilities in reference to
40. Sub-section (1), (3), (5) and Power to allow disclaimer of onerous property
42. Sub-section(1) and (2)of Power to charge a director, manager, officer or any
45. Sub-section (1) and (3) of Power to sanction the exercise of certain powers by
46. Sub-section (1) of section Power to direct the disposal of books and papers
47. Section 350 Power to permit the opening of bank account with
of money by Liquidator
48. Sub-section (1) of section Power to direct the company liquidator to make
to be filed
49. Sub-section (1) of section Power to direct the meetings of the creditors and
354 contributories
50. Sub-section (1) of section Power to declare the dissolution of the company to
356 be void
53. Sub-section (3) and (4) of Powers with respect to winding up of unregistered
54. Sub-section (2) of section Power to issue process for compelling the
424
59. Sub-section (1) of section Power to compound offences punishable with fine
60. Sub-section (2) and (3) of Reference of matter to Mediation and Conciliation
• The Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal shall have, for the purposes of discharging
their functions under this Act or under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016,
the same powers as are vested in a civil court under the Code of Civil Procedure,
1908 while trying a suit in respect of the following matters, namely:—
a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on
oath;
d) subject to the provisions of sections 123 and 124 of the Indian Evidence Act,
g) setting aside any order of dismissal of any representation for default or any
NCLT-1 Petition or application or reference shall be filed with the Tribunal with
• The Tribunal may, after giving the parties to any proceeding before it, a reasonable
opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as it thinks fit.
• The Tribunal may, at any time within two years from the date of the order, with a
view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, amend any order passed
by it, and shall make such amendment, if the mistake is brought to its notice by
the parties.
• No such amendment shall be made in respect of any order against which an appeal
has been preferred under this Act.
• The Tribunal shall send a copy of every order passed under this section to all the
parties concerned.
• No appeal shall lie to the Appellate Tribunal from an order made by the Tribunal
with the consent of parties.
• Every appeal shall be filed within a period of forty-five days from the date on which
a copy of the order of the Tribunal is made available to the person aggrieved and
shall be in such form, and accompanied by such fees, as prescribed:
• The Appellate Tribunal may entertain an appeal after the expiry of the said period
of forty-five days from the date aforesaid, but within a further period not exceeding
forty-five days, if it is satisfied that the appellant was prevented by sufficient cause
from filing the appeal within that period.
• On the receipt of an appeal, the Appellate Tribunal shall, after giving the parties to
the appeal a reasonable opportunity of being heard, pass such orders thereon as
it thinks fit, confirming, modifying or setting aside the order appealed against.
• The Appellate Tribunal shall send a copy of every order made by it to the Tribunal
and the parties to appeal.
Provided that the Supreme Court may, if it is satisfied that the appellant was prevented
by sufficient cause from filing the appeal within the said period, allow it to be filed within
a further period not exceeding sixty days.