AN5535

Application note

Coil selection tool guide for STWLC68GUI

Introduction
This document provides a possible approach to the design of a wireless power receiving coil for low-power applications. Many
parameters are involved in such a design flow, therefore different approaches are possible according to which one is considered
the most relevant one (efficiency, overall quality factor of the coupled resonant circuits, etc.).
The overall efficiency of a wireless power transfer system is generally a reasonable starting point. Mechanical constraints and/or
non-ideal alignment of the coils, as well as data-transfer requirements (e.g. ASK modulation index at transmitter side), are
remarkably impacting on the whole design.
Apart wearable applications requiring customized coils with unusual shapes, usually both transmitting and receiving coils could
be selected from a pool of commercial products based on well-proven designs and showing semi-standardized form-factors and
electrical characteristics. From this perspective, the design of the transmitting coil is not covered by this document.

AN5535 - Rev 1 - July 2020 www.st.com

For further information contact your local STMicroelectronics sales office.
 AN5535
Coupling factor considerations

1 Coupling factor considerations

The coupling factor between transmitter and receiver coils is one of the most critical parameters in the design of a
wireless power transfer system and it may significantly vary due to many reasons. Applications designed to
provide a sort of guided and relatively accurate mechanical alignment of transmitter and receiver coils lead to a
more controlled and predictable operation of the system. On the other side, approximate and variable relative
positioning of the coils requires some margins to ensure power transfer reliability. Figure 1 shows how the
coupling factor between two commercial coils, specifically designed for transmitter and receiver for wearable
applications, varies as a function of distance and relative radial displacement.

Figure 1. Coupling factor versus coils distance and radial displacement

In Figure 1 it also noticeable that perfect axial alignment and proximity (1 mm distance in the origin of the plot) of
the coils results in a maximum coupling factor near 0.6. The coupling factor quickly drops with distance and
displacement: in real applications the minimum distance is dictated by the external enclosure of both transmitter
and receiver active surfaces and the best-case coupling factor could be relatively low. A too low coupling factor
directly impacts on the overall power transfer efficiency, as a consequence of higher power losses in the
transmitter. Figure 1 refers to the first two coils reported in Table 1, used in the STEVAL-ISB045V1T evaluation
board (L1) and in the receiver of the STEVAL-ISB68WA evaluation kit (L2).

Table 1. Transmitter and receiver coils examples

Coil PN (WE) Ref Inductance & DRC max Dimensions

TX: 760308101104 L1 6.8 μH, 125 mΩ 20 mm diameter

RX: 760308101219 L2 11.8 μH, 750 mΩ 15 mm diameter
TX: 760308104113 L3 12 μH, 72 mΩ 60 x 46 mm
RX: 760308102207 L4 8 μH, 80 mΩ 40 x 40 mm

In Figure 2 and Figure 3 the coupling factor of a different TX-RX coils pair (L3 used in STEVAL-ISB044V1 and L4
used in STEVAL-ISB68RX) is shown. Because of the rectangular shape of the transmitter coil, the coupling factor
slightly differs for X-axis and Y-axis displacements.

AN5535 - Rev 1 page 2/12

 AN5535
Coupling factor considerations

Figure 2. Coupling factor versus coils distance and X-axis displacement

Figure 3. Coupling factor versus distance and Y-axis displacement

The bigger size of both coils significantly helps in getting a higher coupling factor over a much wider mis-
alignment area.

AN5535 - Rev 1 page 3/12

 AN5535
Designing the receiver coil with the GUI

2 Designing the receiver coil with the GUI

The STEVAL-ISB68WA evaluation kit provides a control GUI that embeds a section dedicated to the design of a
receiving coil (Figure 4). The design procedure is intended as a guideline and has therefore some limitations (for
example only round coils are supported), but it could be used as a starting point for prototyping a receiving coil.
The initial assumption is that a transmitter is already identified or, at least, its characteristics are suitable for the
mechanical specifications of the receiver coil. For example, wearable applications must probably rely on
customized transmitters due to the mechanical constrains dictated by the design of the device. The first page of
the coil design section allows the user to insert basic mechanical characteristics of the receiver coil, namely its
outer and inner diameter. Since most of the coils are equipped with some shielding material, typically ferrite
compounds, the inductance of the coil is affected. The estimation of the equivalent relative permeability is difficult,
since it depends on many factors. As a first approximation, since the magnetic reluctance of the air gap is much
higher than the ferrite path’s one, a value not far from unity (relative permeability of the air) is chosen.

Figure 4. Initial RX coil specifications

The “Calculate” push-button is used to process the modified values, but an automatic recalculation is performed
whenever the current page is left. In case improper values or unexpected results are encountered, a pop-up
window with a message may appear.
The second page of the design section is dedicated to the transmitter’s details. A set of pre-loaded standardized
transmitting coils is available. Outer and inner diameters, nominal inductance and DC-resistance of the coil are
shown. A customized coil could be eventually specified if not already included in the list. The output impedance of
the power stage of the transmitter (typically the Rds_on of the power transistors) can also be entered to refine the
estimation of the power losses and the quality factor (Figure 5. Transmitter details).

AN5535 - Rev 1 page 4/12

 AN5535
Designing the receiver coil with the GUI

Figure 5. Transmitter details

In this section the expected distance between the transmitter and receiver coils is entered. This parameter, as
already highlighted, may significantly impact on the coupling factor and it will be further addressed in the design
process.
Proceeding with the third page, the ratio between the average diameters of both transmitter and receiver coils is
calculated (Figure 6).

Figure 6. Average coils diameter ratio

This ratio is a preliminary indication of a potential critical coupling between the transmitter and the receiver: a ratio
much lower than unity means that the selected transmitter coil is probably oversized for the desired receiver coil.
For this reason, a good starting point is getting a diameters ratio in the 0.8 – 1.0 range and a pop-up message
could appear to highlight that this condition is not verified. Lower values (e.g. down to 0.5 or less) could also be
considered to widen the area of tolerable reciprocal coils mis-alignment, at the cost of lower coupling factor (with
all related consequences).
Moving to page 4, the operating point is selected. The design of the coil must consider the maximum output
power to be delivered. An application targeting BPP, for example, requires a 1 A current capability at an output
voltage of 5 V (Figure 7).

AN5535 - Rev 1 page 5/12

 AN5535
Designing the receiver coil with the GUI

Figure 7. Operating point selection

The following step consists in translating the DC load resulting from the selected operating point into the
equivalent AC impedance seen by the L-C series resonant circuit the receiver coil is part of. This calculation
includes the voltage drops across the rectifier and the main linear regulator. Both contributions are strictly related
to internal parameters of the device and they are a function of the operating point. Since the corresponding
operating frequency is not predictable at this stage, a 100 kHz reference is used. The voltage at VRECT pin
(output of the rectifier) is thus estimated and the equivalent impedance at the AC1 -AC2 pins calculated
(Figure 8).

Figure 8. Resonant circuit load impedance calculation

In page 6 a further step is done to determine a target value for the inductance of the receiver coil. The concept is
avoiding peak-splitting, a condition that could occur when two resonant circuits having a close resonance
frequency are tightly coupled. Since the power transfer is based on a frequency control (operated by the
transmitter), peak splitting may affect the overall transfer function and it is therefore undesirable. The critical
coupling factor value is the boundary value (for a fixed system) that avoids peak-splitting. In practice a coupling
factor 1.5 times the critical one is still acceptable (also considering that relative displacement of the coils leads to
a reduction of the coupling factor), and the resulting calculated inductance provides a reference upper limit.

AN5535 - Rev 1 page 6/12

 AN5535
Designing the receiver coil with the GUI

Figure 9. Coupling factor and coil inductance estimation

Once the inductance of the receiver coil is selected, an approximate calculation of the number of turns follows.
The fill factor of the winding is set to 0.8 by default, but it can be changed as per user need. The winding should fit
the available area between outer and inner diameters previously defined. The maximum wire diameter is then
calculated (Figure 10).

Figure 10. Coil winding specifications

The selection of the wire diameter and its resistivity allow a rough estimation of the DC-resistance and the
associated power loss (at the reference operating point), as well as the quality factor of the coil (Figure 11).

Figure 11. Coil electrical characteristics

AN5535 - Rev 1 page 7/12

 AN5535
Designing the receiver coil with the GUI

At this point of the coil design procedure a prototype is supposed to be built. Some iterations may be required to
adjust the number of turns leading to the desired inductance value, eventually considering a thicker wire to reduce
the DC-resistance. The electrical parameters of the final coil are then measured and used to proceed with the
design of the series resonant circuit of the wireless receiver (Figure 12 and Figure 13). Optionally, if a coil
prototype is not available, results from the previous sections could be used.

Figure 12. Actual coil characteristics

The proximity of the transmitter coil, usually equipped with a ferrite shield/core, significantly impacts on the
inductance of the receiver coil. As per Qi specifications, this change (inductance on TX) must be taken into
account when designing the series resonant circuit.

Figure 13. Mutual inductance estimation

In page 11 (Figure 14) the default values for both the resonance frequency and the detection frequency are set as
per Qi specification, but they could be user-defined.

AN5535 - Rev 1 page 8/12

 AN5535
Designing the receiver coil with the GUI

Figure 14. Series resonant circuit design

Note: adherence to Qi-specifications is not mandatory. If the receiver operates with a specific transmitter, tailoring the
operating frequency range, the ping frequency and the resonance frequency could help in optimizing the
maximum displacement and/or the overall TX-to-RX efficiency.
The series (Cs) and detection (Cd) capacitors leading to the target frequencies are then calculated. Slightly
different values could be used (selected Cs & Cd), and the corresponding frequencies are recalculated for a final
check. Regarding the capacitors, few simple suggestions are given:
• NP0 dielectric type is preferable whenever possible
• Capacitance variation due to DC bias/temperature-sensitive X5R/X7R (or similar) dielectric types should be
limited to ensure adherence to Qi specifications.
• Multiple capacitors in parallel are preferable to reduce the Equivalent Series Resistance (ESR) and to
increase the overall quality factor of the resonant circuit.
• Excessive RMS current easily stresses the capacitors, especially if tightly packed on a PCB showing poor
cooling.
See also the STWLC68JRH data-sheet for additional considerations about external components.
The last page of the design tool (Figure 15) reports an approximate frequency plot of the quality factor of the
receiver resonant circuit and the TX-to-RX gain (transfer function magnitude).

AN5535 - Rev 1 page 9/12

 AN5535
Designing the receiver coil with the GUI

Figure 15. Coil quality factor and transfer function calculation

Once the design of the whole wireless power received is completed, it is good practice performing efficiency tests
by sweeping over the full Qi frequency range for different operating conditions, monitoring the modulation index at
the VRECT pin to ensure proper RX-TX communication.
Verifying the robustness of the designed receiver by testing different certified transmitters having (or not) similar
coil-type and architecture (half-bridge/full-bridge driver, etc.) is also recommended.

AN5535 - Rev 1 page 10/12

 AN5535

Revision history

Table 2. Document revision history

Date Version Changes

24-Jul-2020 1 Initial release.

AN5535 - Rev 1 page 11/12

 AN5535

IMPORTANT NOTICE – PLEASE READ CAREFULLY

STMicroelectronics NV and its subsidiaries (“ST”) reserve the right to make changes, corrections, enhancements, modifications, and improvements to ST
products and/or to this document at any time without notice. Purchasers should obtain the latest relevant information on ST products before placing orders. ST
products are sold pursuant to ST’s terms and conditions of sale in place at the time of order acknowledgement.
Purchasers are solely responsible for the choice, selection, and use of ST products and ST assumes no liability for application assistance or the design of
Purchasers’ products.
No license, express or implied, to any intellectual property right is granted by ST herein.
Resale of ST products with provisions different from the information set forth herein shall void any warranty granted by ST for such product.
ST and the ST logo are trademarks of ST. For additional information about ST trademarks, please refer to www.st.com/trademarks. All other product or service
names are the property of their respective owners.
Information in this document supersedes and replaces information previously supplied in any prior versions of this document.
© 2020 STMicroelectronics – All rights reserved

AN5535 - Rev 1 page 12/12