0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views14 pages

Final

Uploaded by

zogaintersta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
9 views14 pages

Final

Uploaded by

zogaintersta
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 14

International Journal of Research Studies in Education

2024 Volume 13 Number 6, 1-14

Logical thinking skills and problem solving skills of the


Grade 12 STEM students of University of Northern
Philippines: A basis for extension plan

Ragudo, John Michael G.


University of Northern Philippines, Philippines ([email protected]) ISSN: 2243-7703
Online ISSN: 2243-7711

Received: 30 November 2023 Revised: 22 May 2024 Accepted: 5 June 2024 OPEN ACCESS
Available Online: 5 June 2024 DOI: 10.5861/ijrse.2024.23077

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the logical thinking skills and problem solving skills of the Grade 12
STEM students of University of Northern Philippines during the S. Y. 2018-2019. The respondents were
composed of 104 students from the three sections. It aimed to determine the profile of the students; their
logical thinking skills in terms of abstract reasoning and inductive reasoning; the differences in their
problem solving skills; and the factors that influence their problem solving skills. The descriptive
research design was utilized in this study. Comparative and correlational methods were employed. The
data gathered using the questionnaires for the profile of the students, logical thinking skills test and
problem solving skills test were analyzed using the following statistical tools: frequency and percentage,
mean, One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and multiple linear regression. The findings are the
following: (1) Majority of the respondents are female and 18 years old. They have Php101.00 -
Php200.00 daily allowance. Their fathers are mostly non-professional workers, and both of their parents
are college graduates. Great majority of the respondents came from public schools. (2) The students
have a satisfactory level of logical thinking skills. They are better with abstract reasoning than inductive
reasoning. The students have satisfactory level of problem solving skills. (3) There are no significant
differences in the level of problem solving skills of the students by section. Hence, they possess more
or less the same level of problem solving skills. (4) The inductive reasoning skills of the students is a
predictor of their problem solving skills. Based on the results of the study, the following are
recommended: (1) The students are encouraged to solve and enjoy solving puzzles that would enhance
their logical thinking skills; (2) The students are advised to practice solving math problems to further
improve their skills in problem solving. They are encouraged to master the basic rules of arithmetic and
properties of Algebra by reading mathematics books since these are essential elements to succeed in
problem solving; (3) Students may work on solving sequences that would enhance their inductive
reasoning skills; and (4) Another study could be undertaken considering other variables that would have
a contribution to the performance of the students in problem solving.

Keywords: logical thinking skills, problem solving skills, basis for extension plan

© The Author(s) / Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND


Ragudo, J. M. G.

Logical thinking skills and problem solving skills of the Grade 12 STEM students of
University of Northern Philippines: A basis for extension plan

1. Introduction

Mathematics helps every individual to develop lifelong skills which includes the ability to concentrate in order
to study, focused on tasks, being organized and the ability to stay organized. Knowing basic mathematics principles
keeps one from having to carry around a calculator, because good use of mathematics allows us to do many
calculations in our heads. Mathematics helps us have better problem-solving skills. Mathematics helps us think
analytically and have better reasoning abilities. Analytical thinking refers to the ability to think critically about the
world around us. Analytical and reasoning skills are important because they help us solve problems and look for
solutions. Many students with learning difficulties in the area of mathematics demonstrate specific weaknesses
with mathematics reasoning (Griffin & Jitendra, 2009).

One aspect of the mathematics curriculum that involves high levels of reasoning is solving word problems.
Word problems, sometimes referred to as story problems, are used to give learners a glimpse of how mathematics
is used in the real world (Bogomolny, 2009). Word problems consist of a linguistic presentation of hypothetical
situations in which problems are posed that can be solved through the use of mathematical equations. Some
mathematicians conceptualize word problems as part of a larger problem-solving component of the mathematics
curriculum in which students must overcome barriers in order to obtain and explain a solution to a mathematical
problem that is not directly apparent. Based on this conceptualization of solving word problems, the mathematical
equations are sometimes hidden within multifarious, complex word usage. Sometimes the numerals and numeric
operations are difficult to identify due to unforeseen or unique language structures, especially in the most advanced
word problems. This results in high levels of challenge for many students, particularly those with learning
difficulties in the area of mathematics. (www.shmoop.com/word-problems)

Problem solving is considered one of several desired “21st Century Skills.” Learning how an art program can
promote growth in problem solving can help other art organizations strengthen their programs in this realm.
Logical thinking is the process in which one uses reasoning consistently to come to a conclusion. Problems or
situations that involve logical thinking call for structure, for relationships between facts, and for chains of
reasoning that “make sense.” According to Dr. Karl Albercht (in his book Brain Building), the basis of all logical
thinking is sequential thought. This process involves taking the important ideas, facts, and conclusions involved
in a problem and arranging them in a chain-like progression that takes on a meaning in and of itself. To think
logically is to think in steps.

Problem solving and critical thinking refers to the ability to use knowledge, facts, and data to effectively solve
problems. It does not mean immediate answer is needed, it means one must be able to stand on their feet, asses
problems, and find solutions. The ability to develop a well thought out solution within a reasonable time frame
helps every individual, thus it is a skill that one value greatly. With these observations, the researcher decided to
study problem solving performance and logical thinking skills of the students. Problem solving skill is an ability
which every individual must possess in all aspects of life. The significance of the study is that through this study,
students will have an assessment of their own problem solving skills which may inform them the need for
improvement or enhancement. Moreover, it may provide insights to educators to plan teaching strategies to help
the students improve their problem solving skills.

1.1 Statement of the Problem

This study aimed to determine the logical thinking skills and problem solving skills of the Grade 12 STEM
students at the University of Northern Philippines, S.Y. 2018-2019. Specifically, it sought to answer the following

2 Consortia Academia Publishing (A partner of Network of Professional Researchers and Educators)


Logical thinking & problem solving skills of the Grade 12 STEM students of University of Northern Philippines
questions: 1. What is the profile of the students in terms of age, sex, daily allowance, parents’ occupation, parents’
educational attainment, and type of junior high school completed from? 2. What is the level of logical thinking
skills of the Grade 12 STEM students in terms of abstract reasoning, and inductive reasoning? 3. What is the level
of performance of the Grade 12 STEM students in problem solving? 4. Are there significant differences in the level
of performance in problem solving between and among the three sections of Grade 12 STEM? 5. Is there a
significant influence of the profile of the students and their logical thinking skills on their level of performance in
problem solving? 6. What extension plan can be proposed to improve problem solving skills of students?

1.2 Scope and Delimitation

This study was conducted to determine the logical thinking skills and problem solving skills of the Grade 12-
STEM students of University of Northern Philippines during the school year 2018-2019. It also determined the
profile of the students in terms of: age, sex, daily allowance, parents’ occupation, parents’ educational attainment,
and type of junior high school completed from. The problem solving skills of the students were measured based
on their performance in solving worded problems. Primarily, it determined the significant difference by section on
the performance of the students in problem solving. Furthermore, it also looked into profile of the students and
their logical thinking skills that have influence on their level of problem solving skills.

2. Theoretical Framework

This section provided a theoretical justification to back up the conduct of the study, hence a review of related
studies about Mathematics achievement and other related factors are hereby presented.

On Problem Solving - Kamaruddin and Hazni (2010) mentioned that mathematical problem solving is a
complex and integrative task. First, this task requires a learner to understand the information that is presented in
the problem. Further, mathematical problem solving requires a person to select and use cognitive strategies and
processes that are necessary for task completion. Cognitive strategies and processes for mathematical problem
solving are procedural methods or tools that help individual plan and solve a problem. Possible cognitive strategies
and processes can include finding the algorithm, estimating the problem, or drawing a diagram. Dividing the
process of problem solving into three phases: entry, attack, and review. The entry phase includes thinking about
“what do I know,” “what do I want,” and “what can I introduce.” The review phase further contains “checking,”
“reflecting,” and “extending.” However, a typical problem solving activity is seldom linear; an individual always
goes back and forth when proceeding to the desired outcome. Also it is possible that the attack phase is difficult to
observe or the review phase is missing. Generally speaking, this perspective could provide an overview of the
entire problem solving process so that a clearer relationship between steps could be identified and studied.
According also to Kamaruddin and Hazni (2010) in their studies recommended that the problem solving ability is
very important especially for students. Students can improve their learning ability if the teachers teach them with
the implementation of problem solving.

On Worded Problems - Word problems in mathematics education represent a set of exercise or story problems
that combine words or phrases with numbers. To be successful in solving math word problems, students must learn
how to decode the important information and must understand how to translate the important words or phrases
into a mathematical expression or equation. Word problems play an important role in the Ontario mathematics
curriculum including problems on the EQAO mathematics assessments (Barwell, 2011).

On Logical Thinking - Computer engineering depends on mathematical logic and therefore computer
engineers are expected to be fluent in logical thinking. By possessing logical skill, students could think logically
to solve problem and then converts into programming language in logic manner. By having good logical thinking
skill too, students could gain superior performance (Al-Imamy, Alizadeh, & Nour, 2009) in this course. Technically,
every desired output must be derived from input data which must be processed before it can be produced. In other
words, the outputs are uniquely determined by inputs of the problems (Al-Imamy, Alizadeh, & Nour, 2009).

International Journal of Research Studies in Education 3


Ragudo, J. M. G.
Besides logical thinking, students should possess another important skill in dealing with programming, that is
problem solving. Problem solving is a mental activity and it helps students a lot in understanding programming
concept. By having problem solving skill, students could analyze problems and synthesize a solution and thus
relate to the real world problem (Coles, Jones, & Wynters, 2011). In general, we can say that there are three skills,
problem solving, logical thinking and cognitive skills that the students should have in order to be good in problem
solving.

On Abstract Reasoning - Abstract reasoning ability is a non-verbal measure of reasoning ability. Abstract
reasoning involves the ability to think logically and to perceive relationship in abstract figure or patterns. Abstract
reasoning ability is ability to identify the underlying logic of a pattern and then determine the solution; it is believed
to be the best indicator of fluid intelligence and helps to learn new things quickly. Abstract reasoning is the ability
to understand complex concepts and assimilate new information beyond previous experience. Abstract reasoning
ability is particularly valued where the job involves problem solving, dealing with complex data or concepts,
developments of strategies and designing. Thus the ability is useful in profession such designing architectural,
draftsman-ship, automobile repair, computer programming, and mathematics. Thus abstract reasoning ability can
predict success for all jobs, which require bringing logical analysis to bear in novel and intellectually demanding
situations. (www.shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in)

On Inductive Reasoning - Mousa (2017) found that inductive reasoning is closely connected to intelligence
and the relationship between them is so far strong. In addition, acquisition of new knowledge and skills is also
considered as an important role that inductive reasoning plays in enhancing and developing students’ performance.
There are several advantages that can be acquired by implementing inductive reasoning on school children
regarding knowledge: “inductive reasoning is one of the mental tools that is used not only to acquire new
knowledge, but also to make the acquired knowledge more readily applicable in new contexts”. Inductive
reasoning is a helpful procedure that is useful in making predictions about new hypothesis set by researchers.
“Inductive reasoning involves making predictions about novel situations based on existing knowledge” (Hayes et.
Al, 2010)

On Age - Querubin (2010) found out that age is not significantly related to the performance in College Algebra.
In contrary, Reotutar (2011) found that age and mathematics performance has a significant relationship.

On Sex - In the study of Ballera (2010) as cited by Copio (2015), it was revealed that sex is not significantly
related to the students’ performance in Geometry. Abad (2009) as cited by Copio (2015) also revealed in her study
that sex is not related to performance in Geometry among third year students of Ilocos Sur National High School.
This implies that the male and female students performed more or less the same. In contrary, Bañaga (2015) found
that sex have an influence on the performance in college algebra. According to OECD, girls fell less motivated to
learn math and have less confidence in their abilities than boys. (www.theguardian.com)

On Daily Allowance - In the study of Defiesta (2012) and Tabunan (2012), they found out that there is no
significant relationship between the performance in Plane Trigonometry and their daily allowance.

On Parents’ Educational Attainment - Roberonta (2013) found in her study that there is no significant
relationship between students’ performance in Algebra and mothers’ educational attainment. On the same manner,
Ballerta (2010) claimed that students’ performance in Geometry is not significantly related to the educational
attainment of their parents. It further implies that the educational attainment of parents of the respondents do not
affect their performance in mathematics. Moreover, Abad (2009) as cited by Copio (2015) revealed in her study
that students’ performance in Geometry is not significantly related to parents’ educational attainment.

On Parents’ Occupation - In the study conducted by Roberonta (2013), it was found out that the parents’
occupation of the students does not affect the performance of the students in Algebra. This result was confirmed
by Cabotage (2013) that there is no significant relationship between the students’ mathematical ability and the
means of living of their parents. This implies that whatever kind of means of living their parents it will not affect

4 Consortia Academia Publishing (A partner of Network of Professional Researchers and Educators)


Logical thinking & problem solving skills of the Grade 12 STEM students of University of Northern Philippines
their performance in mathematics.

On Type of High School Graduated From - Palpal-latoc (2011) found out that the type of high school
graduated from has no significant relationship with mathematics performance of students and the same findings
on the study of Tabunan (2012). This is contrary to the findings of Arcaparlas (2013) that the students achievement
in mathematics and the type of high school graduated from are significantly related.

3. Methodology

This section presents and explains the research design that was used in the study, the respondents of the study,
data gathering instrument, data gathering procedure, ethical considerations, and statistical treatment of data.

Research Design. The study used a descriptive, comparative, and correlational methods of research. The
descriptive method was employed to describe the profile of the respondents and the level of performance of the
students in problem solving and logical thinking skills. The level of problem solving skills was regressed on the
logical thinking skills and the profile of the students.

Population. The respondents of the study were the Grade 12-STEM students from Laboratory Schools,
University of Northern Philippines, Tamag, Vigan City during the S.Y. 2018-2019. Total enumeration of the
population was employed. Table 1 presents the distribution of the respondents.

Table 1
Distribution of the Respondents
Section N n
STEM A 41 35
STEM B 39 34
STEM C 39 35
Total 119 104

Data-Gathering Instruments. The instruments used in the study were the following:

Questionnaire on Students’ Personal Profile. This elicited the profile of the respondents namely: sex, age, daily
allowance, parents’ educational attainment, parents’ occupation, and type of junior high school completed from.

Logical Thinking Skill Test. This was composed of multiple-choice type of test grouped into two dimensions.

Abstract Reasoning Test. This composed of 20 items adopted from www.psychometric-success.com.

Inductive Reasoning Test. This composed of 15 items. It entails making conclusions based upon examples
and patterns.

Problem Solving Test. This tested their skills in problem solving which composed of 10 item focused on
worded problems.

Scoring Mechanism. The scores of the students were determined from the rubrics adopted from Copio (2015)
as follows:

 Made no attempt to solve the problem.

 Made little attempt in the form of sketches; jotting down needed relationships; jotting down needed data;
or overtly explaining how to solve the problem. Showed understanding of the problem by the
representations made and early attempts to solve the problem; problem solved about halfway. Made a
great progress in the solution. Problem is nearly solved, solution is correct but minor errors are
committed

 Problem is fully and correctly solved.

International Journal of Research Studies in Education 5


Ragudo, J. M. G.
Test Validity - The test in Inductive Reasoning consisted of 20 original items and the test in Problem Solving
consisted of 20 original items. For content validity, the inductive reasoning test and problem solving test were
presented to three mathematics instructors of senior high school in Laboratory Schools, University of Northern
Philippines to validate the questionnaire. They were requested to give their comments and suggestions for the
improvement of the test questionnaire. The result of the validation of the content validity of the questionnaire is
“Very Satisfactory” with mean rating of 4.24, which means that theitems represent the concepts which are meant
to evaluate the Grade 12 STEM students’ computational skills competence.

Item Analysis - By item analysis, the test of reliability was done by a pilot test at the San Juan National High
School. Fifty-seven (57) Grade 12 - STEM A (consisted of 28 students) and STEM B (consisted of 29 students)
took the test. After gathering the result of the test, Item analysis was employed. Resulting from the item analysis,
the most difficult and those which yielded unacceptable discrimination indices in each content area were excluded.
Originally, both Inductive Reasoning and Problem Solving Test consisted of 20 items. Five (5) items were
discarded in Inductive Reasoning Test and ten (10) items were also discarded in Problem Solving Skills for the
reason that items were very difficult, difficult, and very easy and with a negative discrimination index. KR20
(Kuder-Richardson Reliability) formula was used to find the reliability of the Inductive Reasoning test which
yielded a reliability index of 0.73 which implies that the test is “Adequate” for a test. Cronbach’s Alpha formula
was used to find the reliability of the Problem Solving test which yielded a reliability index of 0.86 which implies
that the test is “Good” for a classroom test based on norms from https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/stata/ado/analysis/

Data-Gathering Procedures. The researcher prepared a request letter to the principal of the respondents. The
researcher coordinated with the teachers of the respondents for the actual test. The researcher prepared and
submitted all necessary documents - i.e. assent forms for aged 12-18 years, study instruments, ethics approval, etc.
In data gathering, 30 minutes was given to the students to answer the 35 multiple choice test in logical thinking
and another 30 minutes to answer the test on problem solving. The researcher personally administered the test and
retrieved the result.

Ethical Considerations. The researcher was a student from University of Northern Philippines whose only
interest was to determine the problem solving skills and logical thinking skills of the Grade 12 STEM students of
University of Northern Philippines. As to privacy and confidentiality, the names and scores of the respondents
were not identified nor revealed. The soft and hard copies of the data gathered were kept safely by the researcher
and disposed and burnt after the completion of the study. The respondents of the study were the Grade 12 STEM
students who are aged 18 years and below. Assent forms were distributed to the prospective participants informing
them of the purposes and importance of the study, including their rights and asking the participant if he or she
would like to participate and respond to the study conducted.to withdraw from the study anytime, and make sure
that when they agreed to be part of the study, they affixed their respective signatures on the form. Gandeza, C. C.,
& Unciano, M. J. R. (2022).

The participants were minors, Grade 12 STEM students age 18 years and below. Total enumeration of the
population was used in the study. It was reiterated to them that their participation was voluntary without any form
of coercion. They were also informed of their right to withdraw from the study anytime they want without penalty
and that their withdrawal will in no way jeopardize their respective work assignments and positions or designations
in the organization. To uphold minimal social risk, the respondents were given enough space on answering the
questionnaire so the other respondents and the heads of offices will not see their responses on the items. Only the
general results were presented in this study.

The study can serve as basis for enhancing instruction and also help the students for their improvement of the
certain topics. Problem solving skills refers to our ability to solve problems in an effective and timely manner
without any impediments. It involves being able to identify and define the problem, generating alternative solutions,
evaluating and selecting the best alternative, and implementing the selected solution. Problem solving skills helps
to show to the employers we have a range of other competencies such as logic, creativity, resilience, imagination,

6 Consortia Academia Publishing (A partner of Network of Professional Researchers and Educators)


Logical thinking & problem solving skills of the Grade 12 STEM students of University of Northern Philippines
lateral thinking and determination. Problem solving skills can make a person better in thinking critically, a person
might think of certain solutions which can be used to solve such issue for a temporary basis and helps conclude
with better solutions with better thinking. It can also make better in risk handling, better communication, increases
understanding, encourages creative ideas and greater productive output specially when in a company or an
organization.

As a sign of gratitude, there were chocolate bars given to the respondents after the conduct of data gathering.
Moreover, the community and the subject organizations were benefitted from the results as their guide in the
formulation and implementation of the different programs, projects, and activities.

There was no specimen used in the study.

Statistical Treatment of Data. After collecting the data needed, the researcher tabulated and analyzed the
gathered data with the help of statistical tools such as follows:

Frequency count and percentage were used to determine the profile of the respondents; Mean was used to
measure the level of performance in problem solving and also their logical thinking skill; The norms that were
used for the interpretation of the level of students’ logical thinking skills and problem solving skills were as follows:

 For the Problem solving skills test (40 items)

 For the overall Logical Thinking Skills (35 items)

 For the Abstract Reasoning (15 items)

 For the Inductive Reasoning (20 items)

Descriptive Rating

32.01 – 40.0 28.01 – 35.0 12.01–15.0 16.01 – 20.0 Excellent (E)


24.01 – 32.0 21.01 – 28.0 9.01 – 12.0 12.01 – 16.0 Very Satisfactory (VS)
16.01 – 24.0 14.01 – 21.0 6.01 – 9.0 8.01 – 12.0 Satisfactory (S)
8.01 – 16.0 7.01 – 14.0 3.01 – 6.0 4.01 – 8.0 Poor (P)
8 and below 7 and below 3 and below 4 and below Needs Improvement (NI)

One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was used to test the difference in problem solving skills by section;
and Multiple Linear Regression was used to determine the influence of the profile of the students and their logical
thinking skills on their level of problem solving skills.

4. Presentation, analysis and interpretation of data

This chapter presents, analyzes, and interprets the data gathered in the study based on the problems raised.
The findings are presented in textual and tabular form.

Profile of the Respondents

Table 2 presents the profile of the Grade 12 STEM students of the University of Northern Philippines in terms
of age, sex, daily allowance, parents’ educational attainment, parents’ occupation, and type of junior high school
completed from.

Distribution of the Respondents in Terms of the Profile of the Students


Grade 12 STEM
Variables A B C As a Whole
f % f % f % f %
a. Sex
Male 13 37.14 15 44.12 10 28.57 38 36.54
Female 22 62.86 19 55.88 25 71.43 66 63.46

International Journal of Research Studies in Education 7


Ragudo, J. M. G.
Total 35 100.00 34 100.00 35 100.00 104 100.00
b. Age
17 12 34.29 6 17.65 8 22.86 26 25.00
18 22 62.86 26 76.47 25 71.43 73 70.19
19 1 2.86 2 5.88 2 5.71 5 4.81
Total 35 100.00 34 100.00 35 100.00 104 100.00
c. Daily Allowance
Php100.00 & below 7 20.00 5 14.71 5 14.29 17 16.35
Php101.00 - Php200.00 21 60.00 25 73.53 24 68.57 70 67.31
Php201.00 & above 7 20.00 4 11.76 6 17.14 17 16.35
Total 35 100.00 34 100.00 35 100.00 104 100.00
d. Parents' Occupation
Father:
Unemployed 7 20.00 7 20.59 4 11.43 18 17.31
Non-professional 20 57.14 21 61.76 14 40.00 55 52.88
Professional 8 22.86 6 17.65 17 48.57 31 29.81
Total 35 100.00 34 100.00 35 100.00 104 100.00
Mother:
Unemployed 11 31.43 13 38.24 14 40.00 38 36.54
Non-professional 12 34.29 11 32.35 9 25.71 32 30.77
Professional 12 34.29 10 29.41 12 34.29 34 32.69
Total 35 100.00 34 100.00 35 100.00 104 100.00
e. Parents' Educational Attainment
Father:
No Formal Education - - - - - - - -
Elementary Undergraduate - - - - - - - -
Elementary Graduate - - - - 1 2.86 1 0.96
High School Undergraduate - - 1 2.94 - - 1 0.96
High School Graduate 7 20.00 6 17.65 6 17.14 19 18.27
College Undergraduate 11 31.43 11 32 8 22.86 30 28.85
College Graduate 17 48.57 14 41.18 18 51.43 49 47.12
Masteral - - 2 5.88 2 5.71 4 3.85
Others - - - - - - - -
Total 35 100.00 34 100.00 35 100.00 104 100.00
Mother:
No Formal Education - - - - - - - -
Elementary Undergraduate - - - - - - - -
Elementary Graduate - - - - - - - -
High School Undergraduate 2 5.71 2 5.88 - - 4 3.85
High School Graduate 2 5.71 2 5.88 6 17.14 10 9.62
College Undergraduate 7 20.00 4 11.76 9 25.71 20 19.23
College Graduate 22 62.86 23 67.65 17 48.57 62 59.62
Masteral 1 2.86 2 5.88 3 8.57 6 5.77
Others 1 2.86 1 2.94 - - 2 1.92
Total 35 100.00 34 100.00 35 100.00 104 100.00
f. Type of Junior High School
Completed from
Public 30 85.71 28 82.35 26 74.29 84 80.77
Private 5 14.29 6 17.65 9 25.71 20 19.23
Total 35 100.00 34 100.00 35 100.00 104 100.00

On Sex. Majority of the respondents are female (63.46%). Majority, also, in all the three sections are female
respondents.

On Age. Majority of the respondents are 18 years old (70.19%). Similarly, all the three sections are dominated
by students whose age are 18 years old.

On Daily Allowance. Majority of the respondents have Php101.00 - Php200.00 daily allowance (67.31%). In
all the three sections, they have Php101.00 - Php200.00 daily allowance

On Fathers’ Occupation. Majority of the respondents’ fathers are non- professional workers (52.88%).
Twenty-nine and eighty-one hundredth percent (29.81%) are professional workers. Seventeen and thirty-one
hundredth percent (17.31%) are unemployed. Moreover, all the three sections’ fathers are non-professional workers.

8 Consortia Academia Publishing (A partner of Network of Professional Researchers and Educators)


Logical thinking & problem solving skills of the Grade 12 STEM students of University of Northern Philippines
On Mothers’ Occupation. A great percentage of the respondents’ mothers are unemployed (36.54%). Thirty-
two and sixty-nine hundredth percent (32.69%) are professional workers. Thirty and seventy-seven hundredth
percent (30.77%) are non- professional.

On Fathers’ Educational Attainment. A great percentage of the respondents’ fathers are college graduate
(47.12%). There are 30 (28.85%) college undergraduates, 19(18.27%) high school graduates, 4 (3.85%) masteral
degree holders, 1 (0.96%) high School undergraduate and also 1 (0.96%) elementary graduate. In addition, most
of all the three sections’ fathers are college graduates.

On Mothers’ Educational Attainment. Majority of the respondents’ mothers are college graduates (59.62%).
In the same way, most of all the three sections’ mothers are college graduates.

On Type of Junior High School Completed From. Great majority of the respondents are from public schools
(80.77%).

Level of Logical Thinking Skills of the Grade 12 STEM Students of University of Northern Philippines

Table 3 shows the level of logical thinking skills per section of the Grade 12 STEM students in abstract
reasoning and inductive reasoning.

Table 3
Level of Logical Thinking Skills per Section of the Grade 12 STEM Students
Grade 12 STEM
Logical Number of A B C Overall
Thinking Skills Items Mean Score DR Mean Score DR Mean Score DR Mean Score DR
Abstract 20 11.69 S 10.56 S 9.37 S 10.54 S
Reasoning
Inductive 15 7.26 S 7 S 5.94 P 6.73 S
Reasoning
Overall 35 18.94 S 17.56 S 15.31 S 17.27 S
Norms:
For 35 items For 15 items For 20 items Rating
28.01 – 35.00 12.01 – 15.00 16.01 – 20.00 Excellent (E)
21.01 – 28.00 9.01 - 12.00 12.01 – 16.00 Very Satisfactory (VS)
14.01 – 21.00 6.01 – 9.00 8.01 - 12.00 Satisfactory (S)
7.01 – 14.00 3.01 – 6.00 4.01 – 8.00 Poor (P)
7 and below 3 and below 4 and below Needs Improvement (NI)

On Logical Thinking Skills

 The students on section A are described to have a “Satisfactory” level of performance in Logical
Thinking Skills with a mean score of 18.94.

 The students on section B got a mean score of 17.56 and also described to have a “Satisfactory” level
of performance in Logical Thinking Skills.

 On the other hand, the students on section C are described to have a “Poor” level of performance in
Logical Thinking Skills with a mean score of 15.31.

 The overall performance of the Grade 12 STEM students in Logical Thinking Skills is a mean score of
17.27. The Grade 12 STEM students are described to have a “Satisfactory” level of performance in
Logical Thinking Skills.

On Abstract Reasoning

 The students on section A with a mean score of 11.69, on section B with a mean score of 10.56, and the
students on section C with a mean score of 9.37 are described to have a “Satisfactory” level of
performance in Abstract Reasoning.

International Journal of Research Studies in Education 9


Ragudo, J. M. G.
 The overall performance of the Grade 12 STEM students in Abstract Reasoning is a mean score of 10.54.
The Grade 12 STEM students are described to have a “Satisfactory” level of performance in Abstract
Reasoning.

On Inductive Reasoning

 The students on section A are described to have a “Satisfactory” level of performance in Inductive
Reasoning with a mean score of 7.26. The students on section B got a mean score of 7 and also described
to have a “Satisfactory” level of performance in Inductive Reasoning.

 However, the students on section c are described to have a “Poor” level of performance in Inductive
Reasoning with a mean score of 5.94.

 The overall performance of the Grade 12 STEM students in Inductive Reasoning is a mean score of
6.73. The Grade 12 STEM students are described to have a “Satisfactory” level of performance in
Inductive Reasoning.

Level of Problem Solving Skills per Section of the Grade 12 STEM Students of University of Northern
Philippines

Table 4
Shows the level of problem solving skills per section of the Grade 12 STEM students.
Grade 12 STEM Problem Solving Skills
Mean Score Descriptive Rating SD SK
A 16.8 S 4.5 -0.10
B 16 P 9.51 1.01
C 17.14 S 5.55 1.03
Overall 16.65 (41.63) S 6.79 0.90
Norm:
32.01 – 40.00 Excellent (E)
24.01 – 32.00 Very Satisfactory (VS)
16.01 – 24.00 Satisfactory (S)
8.01 – 16.00 Poor (P)
8 and below Needs Improvement (NI)

In Table 4, the overall performance of the students in problem solving is Satisfactory with a mean score of
16.65. The scores of the students got a standard deviation of 6.79. The distribution of their scores is positively
skewed (SK=0.90) which means that there are more students who got scores below the mean. Moreover, students
from STEM A and STEM C have satisfactory level of performance in problem solving with mean scores of 16.8
and 17.14, respectively. However, the level of performance in problem solving of students in STEM B is Poor
(𝑥̅=16.00). Based on standard deviations, STEM B students have more dispersed scores. It also revealed that the
scores of the students from STEM A is negatively skewed (SK=- 0.10) which means there are more students who
got scores above their mean score. On the other hand, the scores of the students from the other two sections are
positively skewed. Comparison of the Level of Performance in Problem Solving Between and Among the Three
Sections of Grade 12-STEM students the summary of One-Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) which tests the
significant difference between and among the three sections of Grade 12 STEM students of University of Northern
Philippines is presented in Table 5.

Table 5
Difference in the Level of Performance of the Grade 12 STEM students of UNP in Problem Solving by Section
Source of Variation Sum of Squares df Mean Squares F Sig. Interpretation
Between Groups 23.65 2 11.83
Within groups 4719.89 101 46.73 0.25 3.09 Not Significant
Total 4743.54 103
Significant at 0.05 probability level

10 Consortia Academia Publishing (A partner of Network of Professional Researchers and Educators)


Logical thinking & problem solving skills of the Grade 12 STEM students of University of Northern Philippines
At 0.05 probability level, the computed F-computed of 0.25 is less than the F- critical of 3.09, this leads to not
reject the null hypothesis. This means that there is no significant difference between and among the three sections
of Grade 12 STEM students of University of Northern Philippines in the level of performance in problem solving.
The three sections of Grade 12 STEM students have more or less the same level of performance in problem solving.
Multiple Regression of the Profile of the Students and their Logical Thinking Skills on their Level of Problem
Solving Skills.

Table 6 shows the summary of the regression of problem solving skills on profile of the students and their
level of logical thinking skills.

Multiple Regression of Problem Solving Skills on Profile and Logical Thinking Skills
Beta Coefficients t Stat P-value
Intercept 55.98 2.22 0.03
Age -2.05 -1.54 0.13
Sex 0.64 0.45 0.66
Type of Junior High School Completed From
1.14 0.67 0.50
Mothers’ Educational Attainment -1.25 -1.57 0.12
Fathers’ Educational Attainment 0.10 0.12 0.91
Mothers’ Occupation 1.22 1.35 0.18
Fathers’ Occupation -0.29 -0.28 0.78
Daily Allowance -0.50 -0.43 0.67
Abstract Reasoning -0.03 -0.13 0.90
Inductive Reasoning 0.51 2.07 0.04*
Logical Thinking Skills 0.13 0.89 0.38
*Significant at 0.05 probability level Multiple R = 0.362; R2 = 0.131
F-value = 1.402 p < 0.05

The result of the regression showed a statistically significant regression (H0 : 𝛽i = 0) as supported by an F-
value = 1.402 with a probability level of 0.05, which meant that at least one of the beta values is significant.
Furthermore, the multiple correlation coefficient obtained was 0.362 which indicated a low positive relationship
between the combined effects of the independent variables and the dependent variable. Also, the coefficient of
determination (R2) of 0.131 showed that 13.10% was accounted for the variation of the independent variables
(profile and the level of logical thinking skills) on the dependent variable (level of problem solving skills).
Obviously, 86.90% can be explained by other variables not considered in the regression. The results show that
among all the eleven predictors that may influence their skills in problem solving, only inductive reasoning has a
significant influence on their skills in problem solving as supported by a t-value of 2.07 with p- value of 0.04
which is less than 0.05.

Extension Plan to be proposed to improve Problem Solving Skills of the Students

The extension plan to be proposed is a Mathematics Team-Building Activity focused on worded problems. It
aims to improve the problem solving skills of the students. Team-building activities strengthen groups of people
while working to accomplish a collective goal. Incorporating mathematical skills into team-building activity will
allow students to solve subject specific problems within a group setting and strengthen analytical abilities as well
as cooperative characteristics.

5. Summary, findings, conclusions and recommendations

This study aimed to determine the problem solving skills of the Grade 12 STEM students of University of
Northern Philippines during the S. Y. 2018-2019. The respondents were composed of 104 students from the three
sections. Furthermore, it aimed to determine the profile of the students; their logical thinking skills in terms of
abstract reasoning and inductive reasoning; the differences in their problem solving skills; and the factors that
influence their problem solving skills. The descriptive research design was utilized in this study. Comparative and
correlational methods were employed. The data gathered using the questionnaires for the profile of the students,
logical thinking skills test and problem solving skills test were analyzed using the following statistical tools:

International Journal of Research Studies in Education 11


Ragudo, J. M. G.
frequency and percentage, mean, One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and multiple linear regression.

5.1 Findings

Profile of the Students in Terms of Socio-Demographic Factors; Majority of the respondents are female
(63.46%) and 18 years old (70.19%). Majority of the respondents have Php101.00 - Php200.00 daily allowance
(67.31%). Majority of the respondents’ fathers are non-professional workers (52.88%). A great percentage of the
respondents’ mothers are unemployed (36.54%). A great percentage of the respondents’ fathers are college
graduate (47.12%). In addition, most of all the three sections’ fathers are college graduates. Majority of the
respondents’ mothers are college graduates (59.62%). Great majority of the respondents are from public schools
(80.77%).

5.2 Logical Thinking Skills

The performance of the Grade 12 STEM students in Abstract Reasoning got a mean score of 10.54. The Grade
12 STEM students are described to have a “Satisfactory” level of performance in Abstract Reasoning. The
performance of the Grade 12 STEM students in Inductive Reasoning got a mean score of 6.73. The Grade 12
STEM students are described to have a “Satisfactory” level of performance in Inductive Reasoning. The overall
performance of the Grade 12 STEM students in Logical Thinking Skills got a mean score of 17.27. The Grade 12
STEM students are described to have a “Satisfactory” level of performance in Logical Thinking Skills.

5.3 Problem Solving Skills

The students are described to have a “Satisfactory” level of performance in Problem Solving with a mean
score of 16.8 in STEM A. In STEM B, the students got a mean score of 16 and described to have a “Poor” level
of performance in Problem Solving. It shows in the Table 3 that the students are described to have a “Satisfactory”
level of performance in Problem Solving with a mean score of 17.14 in STEM C. The overall performance of the
Grade 12 STEM students in Problem Solving got a mean score of 16.65. The Grade 12 STEM students are
described to have a “Satisfactory” level of performance in Problem Solving.

5.4 Significant Difference in the Level of Performance in Problem Solving by Section

There is no significant difference in the level of problem solving skills between and among the three sections
of Grade 12 STEM students of University of Northern Philippines. Influence of the Socio-Demographic Profile of
the Students and their Logical Thinking Skills on their Level of Performance in Problem Solving. On overall, there
is a significant influence exist on the skills in problem solving with their profile and logical thinking skills. Only
inductive reasoning has a significant influence on their skills in problem solving.

5.5 Extension Plan proposed to improve the Problem Solving Skills of the Students

The extension plan proposed is a Mathematics Team-Building Activity focused on worded problems. It aimed
to improve the problem solving skills of the students. Team- building activities strengthen groups of people while
working to accomplish a collective goal. Incorporating mathematical skills into team-building activity will allow
students to solve subject specific problems within a group setting and strengthen analytical abilities as well as
cooperative characteristics.

5.6 Conclusions

The respondents of the study composed of more female students, majority are 18 years old, have Php101.00 -
Php200.00 daily allowance, whose fathers are mostly non-professional workers, both parents are college graduates
and great majority came from public schools. The students have a satisfactory level of logical thinking skills. They
are better with abstract reasoning than inductive reasoning. The students have satisfactory level of problem solving

12 Consortia Academia Publishing (A partner of Network of Professional Researchers and Educators)


Logical thinking & problem solving skills of the Grade 12 STEM students of University of Northern Philippines
skills. The three sections possessed more or less the same level of problem solving skills. The inductive reasoning
skills of the students is a predictor of problem solving skills. The problem solving skills could be improved by
mathematics team-building activity focused on solving worded problems.

5.7 Implications for Students, Teachers, and School Administrators

It is crucial that students practice inductive thinking by engaging in activities that strengthen their ability to
see patterns and generalize. Engaging in team-based learning exercises can improve one's capacity for problem-
solving and teamwork. It's also essential to regularly exercise abstract and inductive reasoning through games,
seminars, and puzzles. In order to accommodate students with diverse ability levels, teachers should differentiate
their training, include more inductive reasoning exercises and real-world issue situations in the curriculum, and
encourage collaborative learning through team-building exercises and group projects. It's critical to pursue
professional development to stay current with instructional practices in order to teach these abilities in an effective
manner. The community and parents should be involved in supporting students' learning by highlighting the value
of problem-solving abilities. School administrators should also regularly evaluate and modify the curriculum based
on student performance and invest in ongoing teacher training. Finally, resources should be made available to
support programs and activities that foster logical thinking and problem-solving.

5.8 Recommendations

The students are encouraged to solve and enjoy solving puzzles that will enhance their logical thinking skills.
The students are advised to practice solving math problems to further improve their skills in problem solving. They
are encouraged to master the basic rules of arithmetic and properties of Algebra by reading mathematics books
since these are essential elements to succeed in problem solving. Since inductive reasoning skill greatly affects
problem solving skills of the students, they may work on solving sequences that will enhance their inductive
reasoning skills. The proposed mathematics team-building activity may be adopted for the teaching and learning
process. Another study could be undertaken considering other variables that will have a contribution to the
performance of the students in problem solving.

6. References

Abad, F. G. (2012). Performance in Mathematics of the Second Year Students of Caoayan District. Unpublished
undergraduate thesis, University of Northern Philippines.
Al-Imamy, S., Alizadeh, J., & Nour, M. A. (2009). On the Development of a Programming Teaching Tool: The
Effect of Teaching by Templates on the Learning Process. Journal of Information Technology
Education, 271-283.
Arcaparlas, D. A. (2013). Mathematics preparedness of the first year students in the College of Communication
and Information Technology. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, UNP Vigan City.
Ballerta, C. A. (2010). Performance in Geometry of the third year students of Ilocos Sur National High School.
Unpublished undergraduate thesis, University of Northern Philippines.
Bañaga, J. (2015). Influence of Music on the Performance in College Algebra of BS Information Technology
Students in the University of Northern Philippines. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, University of
Northern Philippines.
Barwell, R. (2011). Word problems: Connecting language, mathematics and life what works? Research into
Practice: Research Monograph 34. Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat.
Bogomolny, A. (2009). Word problems that lead to simple linear equations. Interactive Mathematics Miscellany
and Puzzles. https://www.cut-the-knot.org/arithmetic/WProblem.shtml
Bruin, J. (2006). Newtest command to compute new test. UCLA statistical consulting group. - References -
Scientific research publishing. SCIRP Open Access.
https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2499467
Burgonio, M. R. (2007). Performance in Plane Trigonometry of the BS Fine Arts and BS Architecture students of

International Journal of Research Studies in Education 13


Ragudo, J. M. G.
the University of Northern Philippines. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, University of Northern
Philippines.
Cabotage, D.M. M. (2013). Mathematics preparedness of the first year students in the College of Business
Administration and Accountancy, University of Northern Philippines. Unpublished undergraduate
thesis, University of Northern Philippines.
Coles, D., Jones, C., & Wynters, E. (2011). Programming Contests for Assessing Problem-Solving Ability. The
Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, 28.
Copio, K. W. (2015). Performance in Solving Worded Problems in Solid Mensuration among the First Year Civil
Engineering Students of the University of Northern Philippines. Unpublished undergraduate thesis,
University of Northern Philippines.
Defiesta, E. E. (2012). Performance in Plane Trigonometry of the students in the College of Arts and Sciences.
Unpublished undergraduate thesis, University of Northern Philippines.
Gandeza, C. C., & Unciano, M. J. R. (2022). Personal narratives: A pedagogical intervention in writing. Asia
Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology, 1(1), 56-63.
Griffin, C. C., & Jitendra, A. K. (2009). Word problem-solving instruction in inclusive third-grade mathematics
classrooms. Journal of Education Research, 102(3),187-202.
Hayes, B., Heit, E. & Swendsen, H. (2010). Inductive Reasoning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive
Science, 1(2), 278-292.
Holvikivi, J. (2007). Logical Reasoning Ability in Engineering Students: A Case Study.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/3052890_Logical_Reasoning_Ability_in_Engineering_Studen
ts_A_Case_Study.
Manglapus A. C. J. (2015). (2015). Performance in Solving Worded Problems in Trigonometry of the First Year
Engineering Students of the University of Northern Philippines.
Mousa, M. (2017). The Influence of Inductive Reasoning Thinking Skill on Enhancing Performance. Just a
moment...
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319472191_The_Influence_of_Inductive_Reasoning_Thinkin
g_Skill_on_Enhancing_Performance
Razonable, J. R. (2007). (2007). Performance in Plane Trigonometry of the students in College of Teacher
Education. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, University of Northern Philippines.
Reotutar, M. A. C. (2011). The Performance in Solving Worded Problems (Applied Industrial Mathematics) of
the Second Year College of Technology Students. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, University of
Northern Philippines.
Roberonta, J. B. (2013). Performance in Algebra of the First Year Students of Ilocos Sur Community College: An
Analysis. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, University of Northern Philippines.
Spiridonov. (2011). The Assessment of Problem-Solving Competencies.
Tabunan, K. M. S. (2012). Performance in Plane Trigonometry of the students in College of Communication and
Information Technology. Unpublished undergraduate thesis, University of Northern Philippines.

14 Consortia Academia Publishing (A partner of Network of Professional Researchers and Educators)

You might also like