Module 5-RM&IPR
Module 5-RM&IPR
Syllabus
Industrial Designs: Eligibility Criteria, Acts and Laws to Govern Industrial Designs, Design
Rights, Enforcement of Design Rights, Non-Protectable Industrial Designs India, Protection Term,
Procedure for Registration of Industrial Designs, Prior Art Search, Application for Registration,
Duration of the Registration of a Design, Importance of Design Registration, Cancellation of the
Registered Design, Application Forms, Classification of Industrial Designs, Designs Registration
Trend in India, International Treaties, Famous Case Law: Apple Inc. vs. Samsung Electronics Co.
Geographical Indications: Acts, Laws and Rules Pertaining to GI, Ownership of GI, Rights
Granted to the Holders, Registered GI in India, Identification of Registered GI, Classes of GI, Non-
Registerable GI, Protection of GI, Collective or Certification Marks, Enforcement of GI Rights,
Procedure for GI Registration Documents Required for GI Registration, GI Ecosystem in India.
Case Studies on Patents: Case study of Curcuma (Turmeric) Patent, Case study of Neem Patent,
Case study of Basmati patent, IP Organizations in India, Schemes and Programs
INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS
• The word ‗Design‘ is defined as the features of shape, configuration, pattern, ornament or
composition of lines or colors applied to any article. The Design may be of any dimension
i.e. one or two or three dimensional or a combination of these.
• In addition, it may be created by any industrial process or means, whether manual,
mechanical or chemical, separate or combined, which in the finished article appeal to and
is judged solely by the eye.
• But the word Design does not include any mode or principle of construction or anything
which is in substance a merely mechanical device.
• The main object of registration of industrial Designs is to protect and incentivize the
original creativity of the originator and encourage others to work towards the art of
creativity.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA
• The Design for which the protection is being sought must be novel or original i.e., should
not be disclosed to the public by prior publication or by prior use or in any other way.
• The Design should be significantly distinguishable from the already registered Designs
existing in the public domain.
In India, Industrial Designs are governed under 'The Designs Act' 2000
(http://www.ipindia.nic.in/acts-designs.htm) and ‗Design Rules‘ 2001
(http://www.ipindia.nic.in/rules-designs.htm), which have been amended from time to time in
2008, 2013, 2014 and 2019. The Design should include the following characteristics:
• Coca-Cola Bottle - The contoured-shaped glass bottle of the Coca- Cola Company is
marveled as a master showpiece in the field of industrial design. It was designed in 1915
and is still a cynosure for all eyes.
• iPhone - It is a highly popular mobile phone manufactured by American company ‗Apple
Inc‘. The sleek, handy and rectangular body is pleasing to the eyes. The corners are round
and smooth. The features, such as on/off and speech volume are easy to operate.
DESIGN RIGHTS
• The Design registration also confers a monopolistic right to the Proprietor by which he can
legally exclude others from reproducing, manufacturing, selling, or dealing in the said
registered Design without his prior consent.
• The Design registration is particularly useful for entities where the shape of the product
has aesthetic value and the entity wishes to have exclusivity over the said novel and original
Design applied to its product(s) or article(s)
• Once the applicant has been conferred with the rights over a specific Design, he has the
right to sue the person (natural/entity) if the pirated products of his registered design are
being used.
• He can file the infringement case in the court (not lower than District Court) in order to
stop such exploitation and for claiming any damage to which the registered proprietor is
legally entitled.
• The court will ensure first that the Design of the said product is registered under the
Designs Act, 2000.
• If the Design is found not registered under the Act, there will not be legal action against
the infringer.
• If the infringer is found guilty of piracy or infringement, the court can ask him to pay the
damage (◻ 50,000/-) in respect of infringement of one registered Design.
• The artistic work defined under Section 2(c) of the Copyright Act, 1957 is not a subject
matter for registration for Industrial Designs, such as:
o Paintings, sculptures, drawings including a diagram, map, chart or plan.
o Photographs and work of architecture.
o Any other work related to artistic craftsmanship.
• Industrial Designs does not include any Trademark (The Designs Act, 2000
PROTECTION TERM
• The outer Shape or Design of a product makes it more appealing and acts as the value-
adding factor to the product. Therefore, there is a need to protect one‗s creation from being
used by third parties without consent from the original creator.
• The registered Designs are protected for 10 years in India and can be extended by 5 years
after making a renewal application
• Once the applicant is satisfied that his Design is novel and significantly distinguishable
from other Designs, he can proceed with filing an application for Design registration.
• The application for registration of Design can be filed by an individual, small entity,
institution, organization and industry. The application may be filed through a professional
patent agent or legal practitioner.
• If the applicant is not a resident of India, an agent residing in India has to be employed for
this purpose.
• The applicant submits the registration application at the Design Office Deputy Controller
of Patents & Designs, Patent Office, Intellectual Property Office Building, CP-2 Sector V,
Salt Lake City, Kolkata- 700091.
• After the application has been filed, an officer (examiner) analyses the application for
qualifying the minimum standards laid down for eligibility criteria for registration.
• In case of any query, the same is sent to the applicant and he is supposed to respond within
6 months from the objection raised.
• Once the objections are removed, the application is accepted for registration
• Initially, the Design registration is valid for ten years from the date of registration.
• In the case wherein the priority date has been claimed, the duration of the registration is
counted from the priority date.
• Registration of Design ensures the exclusive rights of the applicant on the Design.
• The owner can prevent the registered Design products from piracy and imitation.
• This helps the owner to boost the sale of the products and establish goodwill in the
market.
The registration of a Design may be cancelled at any time. The petition has to be filed in Form-8
with prescribed fee to the Controller of Designs.
APPLICATION FORMS
There are a total of 24 forms pertaining to Industrial Designs. A list of important forms is
mentioned below.
Fee in Rs
Sl. No Name of the form Form No
Natural person Small Entity Large Entity
Application for
1 Form - 1 1000 2000 4000
registration of Design.
Application for
2 Form –3 2000 4000 8000
renewal of Design.
Application for the
3 Form - 4 1000 2000 4000
Restoration of Design
4 Petition for Form - 8 1500 3000 6000
cancellation for
registration of a
Design.
Notice of intended
exhibition or
5 Form - 9 500 1000 2000
publication of
unregistered Design.
Application for entry
of name of proprietor
6 Form - 11 500 1000 2000
or part proprietor in
the Register.
Request for correction
7 Form - 14 500 1000 2000
of clerical error.
Request for certified
8 Form - 15 500 1000 2000
copy.
Application for
9 rectification of Form - 17 500 1000 2000
Register.
10 Notice of opposition. Form - 19 100 200 400
• Designs are registered in different classes as per the Locarno Agreement, 1968;
https://www.wipo.int/classifications/locarno/loc pub/en/fr/).
• It is used to classify goods for the registration of Industrial Designs as well as for Design
searches.
• The signatory parties have to indicate these classes in the official documents too. The
classification comprises a list of classes and subclasses with a list of goods that constitute
Industrial Designs.
• There are 32 classes and 237 subclasses that can be searched in two languages i.e. English
and French.
• For example, Class 1 includes foodstuff for human beings, foodstuffs for animals and
dietetic foods excluding packages because they are classified under Class 9 (Bottles,
Flasks, Pots, Carboys, Demijohns, and Pressurized Containers). Class 32 classifies the
Design of graphic symbols and logos, surface patterns, ornamentation
• The below figure represents the statistics for Industrial Designs (filed, examined and
registered) for the period 2010-20.
• During this period, an increase of 88%, 117% and 33% was observed in the parameters of
Designs filed, examined and registered, respectively.
• In all three parameters, the graph depicts a similar pattern (more or less) with the highest
numbers observed in 2019-20 for Designs filed (12,268), examined (13,644) and registered
(14,272).
INTERNATIONAL TREATIES
The WIPO has put in place two important treaties (international) dealing with the smooth
functioning of various aspects of Industrial Designs:
• In 2011, Apple Inc. filed a case against Samsung Electronics Co. in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California for infringing their Designs and Utility
Patents of the user interface like screen app grid and tap to zoom.
• As evidence, Apple Inc. submitted the side-by-side image comparison of the iPhone 3GS
and the i9000 Galaxy S to demonstrate the alleged similarities in both models.
• However, later it was found that the images were tempered by the Apple Company to match
the dimensions and features of the controversial Designs.
• So the counsel for Samsung Electronics blamed Apple of submitting false and misleading
evidence to the court and the company countersued the Apple Company in Seoul, South
Korea; Tokyo, Japan; and Mannheim, Germany, United States District Court for the
District of Delaware, and with the United States International Trade Commission (ITC) in
Washington D.C.
• The proceedings continued for the 7 years in various courts. In June 2018 both companies
reached for a settlement and Samsung was ordered to pay $539 million to Apple Inc. for
infringing on its patents.
GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS
• In India, GI was introduced in 2003 and is governed under the Geographical Indications of
Goods (Registration & Protection) Act, 1999 and the Geographical Indications of Goods
(Registration & Protection) Rules, 2002.
OWNERSHIP OF GI
• Right to grant the license to others - The holder has the right to gift, sell, transfer/grant a
license, mortgage or enter into any other arrangement for consideration regarding their
product. A license or assignment must be given in written and registered with the Registrar
of GI, for it to be valid and legitimate.
• Right to sue - The holder of GI has the right to use and take legal action against a person
who uses the product without his consent.
• Right to exploit - The holder of GI can authorize users with exclusive right to use goods
for which the GI is registered.
• Right to get reliefs - Registered proprietors and authorized users have the right to obtain
relief concerning the violation of such GI products
REGISTERED GI IN INDIA
GI Type State
Darjeeling Tea Agriculture West Bengal
IDENTIFICATION OF REGISTERED GI
• Registered GI products are granted a tag, which is printed on the registered products. The
tag confirms the genuineness of the product in terms of its production (by set standards)
and location of production.
• Non-registered GI products cannot use/exploit this tag.
• By and large, GI tags represent the place of origin (of the product) along with cultural
and/or historical identity e.g. Darjeeling Tea, Mysore Silk, Tirupathi Laddu, etc.
• In India GI tags are issued by the Geographical Indication Registry under the Department
for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade, Ministry of Commerce and Industry.
• The head of GI registry is at Geographical Indications Registry Intellectual Property Office
Building, Industrial Estate, G.S.T Road, Guindy, and Chennai - 600032.
• GI registered products can be grown / produced in any part of the world using standards
laid down by the GI Registry.
• However, these products cannot be labeled as GI as they are not produced/ manufactured
in a specific geographical location, as mentioned in the official records maintained by the
GI Office of GI.
• For example, plants of Darjeeling Tea can be grown in any part of India. But the tea leaves
of these plants cannot be sold under the brand name of Darjeeling Tea, as the concerned
plants were not grown in the soil and climate of the Darjeeling area.
CLASSES OF GI
• GI certified goods are classified under 34 different classes, such as Class 1 is for chemicals
used in industry, science, photography, agriculture, horticulture and forestry; unprocessed
artificial resins, unprocessed plastics; manures; fire extinguishing compositions; tempering
and soldering preparations; chemical substances for preserving foodstuffs; tanning
substances; adhesives used in industry.
• Class 33 is for alcoholic beverages (except beers) and Class 34 is related to tobacco,
smoker‘s articles and matches. More details can be extracted from the official website of
CGPDTM Office
NON-REGISTERABLE GI
For GI registration, the indications must fall within the scope of section 2(1) (e) of GI Act, 1999.
Being so, it has to also satisfy the provisions of Section 9, which prohibits registration of a GI
mentioned below:
PROTECTION OF GI
• The IP rights to GI are enforced by the court of law of the concerned country.
• The GI registration of a product has certain advantages.
• It enables to identify pirated/non-genuine stuff, provides more commercial value to the
product, and also strengthens the case if it reaches the judicial courts.
• The two common methods of protecting a GI are:
o Sui generis systems (i.e. special regimes of protection) and under certification or
collective mark systems. Many countries, including India to protect GI by using the
sui generis system.
o This decision was taken after the TRIPS agreement (1995) and an option was given
to the countries to choose either TRIPS standards or the sui generis system.
o This was decided by considering the fact that every country has different legislation
and geographical structures & resources. Therefore, this system is not uniform in
all countries and varies according to the jurisdiction and legislation of the particular
country.
• Certification marks aim to certify the products comply with specific quality standards
irrespective of their origin. These standards include permitted materials and manufacturing
methods.
• Therefore, the purpose of certification marks is to distinguish certified goods from non-
certified ones.
• Collective marks are owned by associations ensuring compliance with the agreed standards.
• Collective marks signify that a good or service originates from a member of a particular
association.
• The Collective mark is used by cooperating enterprises that have agreed to comply with
defined quality standards for goods or services that share common characteristics
ENFORCEMENT OF GI RIGHTS
• Prior to filing an application for registering GI, it is prudent to search whether the
concerned GI is already protected or not. This can be done by using search engines created
by WIPO.
• The list of registered GI in India can be accessed from the official website of CGPDTM.
• Once the prior search for registered GI is done, the applicant has to file an application.
• The application for GI can be forwarded by an individual or an organization or authority
of people established under Indian law.
• The application in a prescribed format is submitted to the Registrar, Geographical
Indications along with the prescribed fee.
• In the application, the applicant needs to mention the interest of the producers of the
concerned product.
• The application should be duly signed by the applicant or his agent with all the details
about the GI that how its standard will be maintained.
• The submission of three certified copies of the map of the region where the GI belongs is
mandatory. Once the application is filed at GI Registry, the Examiner will scrutinize the
application for any deficiencies or similarities.
• If the examiner finds any discrepancy, he will communicate the same to the applicant,
which is to be replied within one month of the communication of the discrepancy.
• Once the examiner is satisfied with the response/s, he files an examination report and hands
over the same to the Registrar. Once again, the application is scrutinized.
• If need be, the applicant is asked to clear any doubts/objections within two months of the
communication otherwise, the application will be rejected.
• After getting a green signal from the Registrar, the application is published in the official
Geographical Indication Journal for seeking any objections to the claims mentioned in the
application.
• The objections have to be filed within four months of the publication. If no opposition is
received, the GI gets registered by allotting the filing date as the registration date.
• Initially, GI is registered for ten years but is renewable on the payment of the fee.
GI ECOSYSTEM IN INDIA
Turmeric Patent Battle: The Turmeric Case is one of the most publicized cases involves the
patenting of the wound healing properties of turmeric (Curcuma longa) by two scientists of Indian
origin in the United States in 1994. Turmeric powder, specifically for wound healing, was patented
in the US by the University of Mississippi Medical Center. Although existing knowledge is not
patentable, and the essential criterion of novelty should disqualify it as an invention, the patent was
granted due to a failure by the Patent Office to identify the existing knowledge. This case sparked
considerable discussion and debate in India as the knowledge was available in ancient Ayurvedic
texts. The Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) , New Delhi challenged the patent’s
grant before the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and a re-examination application was
filed with US Patent Office claiming the use of turmeric powder was no novel invention and the
medicinal use existed since ages. All the supporting evidence of ancient Sanskrit were presented.
Later, the US Patent Office revoked this patent stating the patent were obvious and agreeing the use
of turmeric having been known in India for centuries.
Another instance involves the medicinal plant Neem (Azadirachta indica), whose properties were
well known in India but not as recognized in the US and Europe. Neem extracts are used in
agriculture for pest and fungal control, and neem oil has medicinal properties. It has been used
traditionally to treat various diseases, and neem twigs are used as toothbrushes. Neem Patent Battle:
In 1994, the European Patent Office (EPO) granted a patent to the US corporation W.R. Grace
Company and the US Department of Agriculture for a ”method for controlling fungi on plants by
the aid of hydrophobic extracted neem oil.” This patent was opposed by various non-governmental
organizations and Indian farmers, providing evidence of neem’s traditional use. The European
Patent Office later revoked the patent in 2000, stating it lacked inventive steps.
Basmati rice is an aromatic variety grown in India and Pakistan. It has a long history in the region,
with farmers conserving distinct varieties for centuries.
Basmati Patent Battle: An American company ‘RiceTec’ was granted US Patent on ‘basmati rice
lines and grains’. The patent includes basmati and basmati-like rice. The company also claimed that
it’s the novel innovation of them creating such rice. Which also caused crisis between India and
United States. The Indians claimed that the innovation they are claiming are false, India
threateningly took the matter to WTO as violation of TRIPS. Later, RiceTec withdrew the claims
of the patent. This controversy highlighted issues related to traditional knowledge.
These case studies underscore the importance of protecting traditional knowledge from
misappropria tion through patents. These cases also emphasize the need for a balanced approach
that respects both traditional practices and modern innovations.