Capacity Planning Fundamentals
Capacity Planning Fundamentals
P: (877) 322-5800
[email protected]
Capacity Planning
Fundamentals
Richard Grimes
Table of Contents
This course identifies the fundamental considerations associated with capacity planning so a
student can converse more knowledgeably with plant designers, industrial engineers, and
representatives of operations, procurement, human resources, and safety.
Learning Outcomes
Intended Audience
This course is designed for project managers, operations managers and supervisors, human
resource professionals, or anyone involved in the process of converting raw materials into
finished products who want to have a fundamental understanding of the factors that influence
planning the capacity of a production process. These products can also be finished documents
and not only hardware or durable goods.
Capacity is about an organization’s capability of producing something. Planning for this capacity
typically happens at a variety of levels and detail. This course will focus on the basics essential
to a fundamental understanding of the process.
Unfortunately, this is not a perfect world and many factors can impact the ability of our assembly
lines to hum along at peak efficiency. Companies who enjoy greater success in producing,
selling, and delivering products focus on the demand side of the equation. In other words, the
more they can understand their customers’ needs and meet them, the greater their success.
This is in contrast to companies who focus primarily on their suppliers by fighting hard for the
best prices, quantities, qualities, and delivery dates.
Although it is certainly important to fight for the best prices, etc. from your supplier, it is only
through a strong relationship with their customers that a producer can make sure they buy the
right kinds of raw materials in the qualities and quantities they need to meet demand. It is
surprising but true that many manufacturers have a lot of money tied up in inventory that is
either obsolete or just not part of what customers are demanding currently. They focus on what
they have to sell instead of what their customers want to buy.
We will begin our learning by looking at three strategies to plan capacity: lead, average, and
lagging.
Units
3. Lagging capacity strategy – capacity expands after an increase
has been documented. Although customer service suffers
initially, it assumes they will be back because there are few (if
any) other places where they can obtain this product after our
capacity has increased. Time
Once a capacity strategy is identified, then the extent of the increase is based upon:
The volume and certainty of anticipated demand
Strategic objectives in terms of customer service, anticipated growth, and anticipated
competition
The cost of anticipated expansion and operation to meet the company’s strategy
We will address the issues of anticipating demand and production planning in the rest of this
course.
The art (or science depending on how you look at it) of laying out a facility has changed over the
years because of changes in:
1. Our concepts of how to produce (do we keep extensive inventory on hand because we
are supplier driven or small amounts -“just-in-time” - because we are customer focused);
2. What to produce (markets have changed in demand and location)
3. The constant evolution of technology plus a shrinking, ageing workforce can change our
long-term strategy.
Some thinking associated with the machinery we will use or tasks we must complete should
consider:
Minimize material-handling costs
Utilize space and labor efficiently
Eliminate bottlenecks
Facilitate communication and interaction between all involved
Reduce manufacturing cycle time and customer service time
Eliminate wasted or redundant movement
Increase capacity (produce more, not just do more)
Facilitate entry, exit, and placement of material, products, and people
Incorporate safety and security measures
Promote product and service quality
Encourage proper maintenance activities
Provide a visual control of activities and flexibility to adapt to changing conditions
We will look at three basic types of layouts. Please remember that capacity planning is not
confined to just “making things”, it is also relevant to customer service businesses and retail
outlets where customers serve themselves. The three most common examples are:
1. Process (aka ‘functional’) layouts - group similar activities together according to the
process or function they perform
3. Fixed-position layouts - are used for projects in which the product cannot be moved
This layout groups similar functions together. It may be thousands of different types of items in a
do-it-yourself ‘big box’ store, types of clothing in a retail store that makes it easy for clerks or
customers to find what they need by visiting different departments or a machine shop may
group saws in one place, drills in another, and sanders in a third.
This layout is characteristic of intermittent operations where a wide variety of customers with
wide-ranging needs are served. In a process layout, like a machine shop or automotive repair
center, the equipment is general purpose and the workers are
skilled at operating their machines in their departments or
areas.
Plumbing Lighting
Finished wood
Product layouts are better known as assembly lines. Henry Ford taught this to American
industry when he demonstrated that a line of sequential events with each sub-assembly having
its own line was a secret to mass production. (This assumes, of course, that materials flowed
into the plant at about the same speed finished cars rolled out the other end.) The flow of work
is orderly and efficient moving from one workstation to the next where the technicians wait to
perform their specialty – whether welding the car frame or tightening a lug nut on a wheel.
Since the market for these products is very specific, dependable, stable, it makes economic
sense to purchase large, immovable machines performing limited functions. The product made
is a standardized one (not like a craftsman’s single piece) and the volume is high.
Table 2 Product Layout
Characteristics Application to a Product Layout
Description Sequential arrangement of activities
Type of Process Continuous, mass production, mainly assembly
Product Standardized – made to stock
Demand Stable
Volume High
Equipment Special Purpose
Workers Limited skills - no cross functional work potential
Inventory Low in-process, high finished goods
Storage Space Small
Materials Handling Fixed path (conveyor)
Aisles Narrow
Scheduling Stable - Varies with balancing and demand
Layout Decision Line balancing
Goal Equalize work at each station
Advantage Efficiency
Product Layout
In
Out
This layout is the only one suitable for its products that
cannot be moved until nearly completed. They are too
large, bulky, or fragile to be moved such as houses,
ships, or airplanes. The highly skilled workers – such as
carpenters, plumbers, electricians, and painters – come
to the layout. Their specialized equipment, such as
cranes, scaffolding, generators, or air compressors for
painting, is rented for the project.
There is one primary consideration when designing a process layout: MINIMIZE MOVEMENT
AND/OR MATERIALS HANDLING COSTS. Following that rule, work stations with the greatest
interaction between each other should be as close as possible while those having the least
amount of contact with the others should be placed at the fringes of the work area unless some
safety, construction, or cost consideration must take precedence.
There are two commonly used methods of approaching the layout design:
Block diagramming – use to minimize nonadjacent workloads or when quantitative
data is available
Relationship diagramming - based on location preference between areas or when
quantitative data is not available
Block Diagramming
We use historical data or talk with experienced employees to estimate the presumed movement
between two work stations. We will express our finding in terms of “loads” and distance to move
that load. The content and weight of the load depends on the business. It may be palletized for
moving with a forklift like lumber that a cabinet maker would use, in baskets of sub-documents
that an employee would carry for a document processing business, or parts of a meal that an
employee of a fast-food restaurant would assemble and hand to the customer on a tray.
Stations Loads Stations Loads Stations Loads Stations Loads Stations Loads
A-B 100 B-A 0 C-A 0 D-A 0 E-A 0
A-C 110 B-C 200 C-B 0 D-B 0 E-B 0
A-D 0 B-D 150 C-D 40 D-C 0 E-C 0
A-E 0 B-E 50 C-E 50 D-E 60 E-D 0
Obviously, there will be places that receive work but do not send it back into the system such as
workstation “E” in our example which, by simply looking at the activity, indicates it’s the end of
the production line. Materials from here do not come back into the layout but must go “outside
the system”, i.e., out of the factory to the consumer.
Although this table is accurate regarding the data, it doesn’t tell us much about the potential
layout. But, if we construct a simple grid to understand the flow better, it all becomes more
visible. Especially the 150 loads moving between non-adjacent locations (dotted lines).
100 200
A B C
150 50 50
60
D E
40
A little change in the work locations of the future facility can greatly improve the workflow like
this. The same amount of loads move but there is no long trips around work stations as in the
first diagram.
100 150
A B D
20 50 40 60
110
50
C E
Now that you have a better positioning of the work stations by eliminating all of the nonadjacent
workloads, you can use that layout as a basic for the building plans. Many vendors provide
templates for the space required for their equipment installation and maintenance and will help
you begin to sketch the layout. Since this is not a design course, we won’t go into great detail.
Suffice it to say the diagram above can easily become these block diagrams.
A D
A B 4 B
C E C E
If quantitative data is not available or moving large amount of material is not relevant to the
organization’s function, a relationship diagram is very useful when managers want to plan the
layout of their department. (This planning tool, a Muther’s Grid, was devised by Richard Muther,
an Industrial Engineer, in 1956 and has grown in use well beyond the scope of this course.)
Like all good tools in engineering, it is based upon a simple concept that can be applied
universally. The preference information for the location of offices is based on the familiar five
vowels used in English: A, E, I, O, and U with the letter X added. The letters help us remember
the preference code used in the grid. “A” means “absolutely necessary”, “E” is “especially
important”, “I” means simply “important”, “O” is “okay”, “U” is “unimportant”, and “X” is
“undesirable.” As you can see, they descend in logical order from absolutely necessary to
undesirable.
Come into the grid like a highway mileage chart along the
List all colored row comparing the top of the list with each office
of the
offices below in order. For example, what about putting offices next to
in any
order
the production area, and we say, “OK” by putting an O there.
on
these
lines
Production
O
Offices A A Absolutely necessary
U I E Especially important
Stockroom O E I Important
A X A O Okay
Shipping and receiving U U U Unimportant
U O X Undesirable
Locker room O
O
Tool room
This final look at the grid tells us the department manager says (among other things), “It’s OK
(O) if offices are next to production, absolutely necessary (A) that the stockroom be next to
production, important (I) that shipping and receiving be next to production but that the offices
MUST NOT (X) be next to the locker room.”
Key:
Office Locker Shipping A
and
receiving E
O
Stockroom Tool room Production
U
Clearly, we see in this diagram those three stations with great importance for each other, the
stockroom, production, and shipping and receiving, are too far apart for maximum efficiency.
Also, the locker room should not be next to the offices. So, if we rearrange the offices based on
the Muther Grid showing our preferences, we will get a traffic pattern like this.
Stockroom
Office Shipping
and
receiving
Service layouts frequently follow production layouts from the perspective of smooth flows of
traffic but in retail outlets, the businesses’ objectives will influence parts of the layout.
For example, a grocery store will arrange its shelves with milk at one end of the store with bread
at the other to lead customers along a path of attractive displays, much lighting, and sale items
as they fill their shopping carts. Retail clothing outlets encourage shoppers to browse around
randomly spending as much time as possible at every counter.
The product layout is the basic assembly line of sequential tasks that Henry Ford immortalized
when he created the American auto industry. Although a very straightforward concept, there are
some considerations necessary to optimize the potential speed and efficiency of the line. These
‘optimization’ topics are what we will consider next.
Precedence diagram – a drawing showing the assembly line with work stations
arranged so as to honor the precedence requirements
Work station – any place along the line where work is done on the product
Line balancing – the process of equalizing the amount of work at each work station so
the line keeps moving and no back-ups occur
Cycle time – the maximum amount of time a part in the assembly process can spend at
any single workstation in order to meet production requirements in a balanced line. We
emphasize “can spend” because we want to meet some production criteria. Do not
confuse this with “does spend” which is the amount of time a part may spend at a station
if the line is not balanced.
Flow time – the amount of time it takes a product to emerge from the end of the
production line in comparison to when it entered the line. This includes all time spent
waiting at any workstation.
.
Line efficiency – is the ratio of the time spent doing work to the overall flow time of an
assembly line. The overall flow time may include some idle time at one workstation while
work at another takes a little longer for completion. For example, if the flow time for a
product is 200 seconds which includes 40 seconds of idle time at one workstation while
1 2 3
Let’s talk about cycle time and see how the term, “the maximum time that can be
spent at a work station” applies in a production setting.
Suppose a company wants to produce 200 radios in an eight hour day (or work
shift.) The first thing we must do is break the hours into minutes to get the smallest
practical time unit available. Therefore, an eight hour day (or shift) is also equal to 8
Think
about… hours x 60 minutes in an hour = 480 minutes. So we now know the company wants
to produce 100 radios within 480 minutes.
Our formula for cycle time is Ct = production time available/desired units of output or 480/100 =
4.8 minutes. This means the longest time a radio can spend at any workstation is 4.8 minutes.
It does not matter how many work stations you have in the process because this assumes the
radios are working their way along the assembly line continuously. What it DOES TELL YOU is
the longest it can sit at any one station is 4.8 minutes if you expect to produce 100 radios in 480
minutes.
6 Attach the back to the radio (only after all internal work is done) 25
8 Place in box, send to shipping department, and get ready for the next 8
one.
(This must be done last.)
This is what we must determine: (come back and answer these as we move through the
lesson.)
If we set up the production line with the eight steps and times shown above, what will be
the cycle time per radio? ________
If we set up the production line with the eight steps and times shown above, what will be
our production capacity for each eight-hour shift? ____
If we set up the production line with the eight steps and times shown above, what will be
our production efficiency for each eight-hour shift? _____
What is the best line balancing we can achieve each shift? (You will see which choice
is best.) This is how we will find the answers to these questions.
What is the longest time for any single task? _______ Write this amount in each cell in
that column. Why should we do that? (This becomes evident soon, also.)
Can additional tasks be completed and moved before the longest task is finished?
___________
What impact does that “longest task” have on the whole work cycle? (Everything else
stops until this part is completed)
Write in the amount of idle time at each station while waiting for the longest task to be
completed.
Is this the only sequence that we can have? (Answer: The step at station #1 must
come first and placing in a shipping box must come last.)
Steps 2 & 3 can be reversed if neither must come before the other and there isn’t some
other reason why we can’t such as having the AM & FM receivers in the cabinet would
Step 5 must have something inside the radio to which we can attach the cord.
Step 6 must come now because we cannot put on the back until everything is placed
inside.
The only flexibility we have is reversing steps 2 & 3 if that would help.
What is the longest time spent at any workstation? (Answer: 120 seconds at step 3.)
What happens to the whole assembly line while step #3 occurs? (Answer: The whole
line stops and waits.)
This is what production actually looks like with all workstations filled and taking into account
delays while longer processes are completed.
Work Process Task Longest Idle time waiting
Station Time time for for next work
# any task station
1 Receive the new radio shell & clean it. 12 120 108 (We work for
(This must be done first.) 12 seconds and
wait for another
108 until station 3
completes it work
of 120 seconds.)
2 Install internal speakers 45 120 75
3 Install AM & FM receivers 120 120 0
4 Secure all connections 30 120 90
5 Attach the 120 volt cord 42 120 78
6 Attach the back (we must complete internal 25 120 95
work first.)
7 Test the AM & FM receivers 15 120 105
8 Place in box for shipping. (This must be last.) 8 120 112
Time in seconds 297 960 663
Flow
Time
More Questions
1. If we set up the production line with the eight steps and times shown above, what will be
our production capacity for each eight-hour shift?
We have seen that it takes 960 seconds for a complete “flow” in the assembly of one
radio. Since our answer for flow time is expressed as seconds, we must convert our 8-
hour work shift to seconds so we are dealing with similar amounts.
The 8-hour shift has 60 minutes in each hour with 60 seconds in each minute.
Therefore, 8 x 60 x 60 = 28,800 seconds per shift. If it takes 960 seconds to build a
radio and we have 28,800 seconds on the shift, we can build 28,800 ÷ 960 = 30 radios
per shift.
2. If we set up the production line with the eight steps and times shown above, what will be
our production efficiency for each eight-hour shift?
We found the flow time to be 960 seconds. During this time, work is being done for only
297 seconds: the rest of the cycle is idle time waiting for the longest task to be
completed so the line can move again. The efficiency of the line is determined by
dividing the total work time within a flow by the length of the work flow. This is 297 ÷
960 = 30.9% efficient.
We will rearrange the tasks slightly to reduce as much idle time as possible. We will still
acknowledge the sequence requirements (which step must come before any others) as
we do this.
We collapsed eight separate steps into four, grouped three steps together for completion (117
seconds) as station #3 while waiting for step #2, and three steps at station #4 for 48 seconds.
This means we can save money on purchasing workstations and hiring workers for each station.
Work flow time remains at 297 seconds because it still takes the same amount of work to build
each radio. However, we have reduced the waiting time significantly. This means the cycle
time is lower, too. This means we can produce more radios during each shift.
If it now takes 480 seconds to build a radio and we have 28,800 seconds on the shift, we can
build 28,800 ÷ 480 = 60 radios per shift.
Here is another way of line balancing that considers the precedence requirements as we
package food. We will use the information in the boxes below.
0.2
B
0.1 A D 0.3
C
0.4
This assumes a 40 hour production week and a desire to produce 6,000 units per week. First,
we convert 40 hours into minutes by multiplying 40 hours x 60 minutes/hour to get 2,400
production minutes per week.
If we want to produce 6,000 units during these 2,400 minutes, we see we have only .4 minutes
available to produce one item (2,400/6,000 = .4)
Our chart above shows the maximum cycle time is .4 minutes at step C and the flow time is 1.0
minutes (.1 at A; .2 at B, .4 at C, and .3 at D = 1.0 minute.)
A, B C D
OBSERVATION CODES
W = Working (doing what they are paid to do) M = Moving from work station
I = Idle (any time waiting or not working) F = Filing (Or storing something)
What comments can be made about improving the workflow based on this example?
Step Describe the Step Code Distance Time in Comments
# in feet min/sec
1. Goes to incoming mail area to M 70’ r/t 0:45 (next page)
get expense reports and
returns to work station (desk)
2. Opens envelope, organizes W - 1:15
receipts.
3. Notices some expense code W - 2:10
fields are empty, looks up
proper codes.
4. Completes authorization to W - 0:15
reimburse form on PC and
send to the shared printer.
5. Goes to shared printer to get W 25 0:10
form
6. Waits while admin assistant I - 2:15
finishes printing new parking 60’ r/t for
policy.(Admin assistance goes admin
to get more paper.)
7. Takes printed form to boss for M 45’ 0:20
review and approval.
8. Boss on the phone – clerk I - 3:15
waits
9. Goes to copier to make 2 W 35’ 0:25
copies of approved form
10. Copier toner low. Must find W/I - 3:50
new cartridge and refill
11. Makes copies and back to W 35’ 0:20
desk
12. Cuts reimbursement check W - 2:00
and places it into I/O envelope.
13. Starts at step 1 again
And, when you think about it, that is what this course is all about...streamlining the workflow to
increase your production capacity.