List files over a specific size in current directory and all
subdirectories
stackoverflow.com /questions/13282786/list-files-over-a-specific-size-in-current-directory-and-all-
subdirectories
find . -size +10k -exec ls -lh {}
\+
the first part of this is identical to @sputnicks answer, and sucesffully finds all files in the directory over 10k (don't
ls -
confuse k with K), my addition, the second part then executes lh or ls that lists(-l) the files by human
readable size(-h). negate the h if you prefer. of course the {} is the file itself, and the \+ is simply an alternative
to \;
which in practice \; would repeat or:
ls -l found.file; ls -l found.file.2; ls -l
found.file.3
where \+ display it as one statement or:
ls -l found.file found.file.2
found.file.3
more on \; vs + with find
Additionaly, you may want the listing ordered by size. Which is relatively easy to accomplish. I would at the -s
ls - sort -
option to ls, so ls and then pipe it to n to sort numerically
which would become:
find . -size +10k -exec ls -ls {} \+ | sort
-n
or in reverse order add an -r :
find . -size +10k -exec ls -ls {} \+ | sort -
nr
finally, your title says find biggest file in directory. You can do that by then piping the code to tail
find . -size +10k -exec ls -ls {} \+ | sort -n | tail
-1 would find you the largest file in the
directory and its sub directories.
note you could also sort files by size by using -S, and negate the need for sort. but to find the largest file you
would need to use head so
find . -size +10k -exec ls -lS {} \+ | head
-1
sort -
the benefit of doing it with -S and not sort is one, you don't have to type n and two you can also use -h
the human readable size option. which is one of my favorite to use, but is not available with older versisions of
ls, for example we have an old centOs 4 server at work that doesn't have -h
1/1