MARTHANDAM COLLEGE OF

ENGINEERING AND
TECHNOLOGY

DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION

ENGINEERING

UG-PROGRAMME

PROJECT WORK ASSESSMENT RECORD

Academic Year:
Batch:
Title of the Project:
Project Members: (Maximum number is limited to 4)

Passport Size
Photo

Name with
initial at the end

Register
Number

Mobile

Email

Signature

Aim of the Project: (Should be specific in not more than three lines/Points)

Scope of the Project: (Should be specific in not more than three lines/points)

Supervisor Project Co-ordinator HOD

GUIDELINES FOR PROJECT WORK (2024-2025)

 Project work may be allotted to a single student or ta group of students not exceeding
4 per group
 Project batches once allotted will not be changed for any reason.
 Project title must be selected after getting approval from the respective guide and
project coordinator. The project coordinator has the right to accept or refuse the title
of the project.
 The project title once finalised cannot be changed for any reason unless the project is
rejected during subsequent reviews.
 Every batch should meet their respective guide and project coordinator at the
beginning of each week (Monday) and get work assigned from them. The status of the
assigned work should be reported at the end of the week (Friday or Saturday) to the
respective guide and project coordinator.
 An assessment record should be maintained by each batch and the status of the project
work should be recorded in it. It is the responsibility of the project batch to get it
signed by the respective guide and project coordinator each week. This will ensures
the progress of the students project work.
 The candidate interested in doing the industrial projects must get prior permission
from the HOD/Institution, failing which the work will not be approved.
 A candidate may however in certain cases be permitted to work on projects in an
Industrial Research organisation, on the recommendations of the HOD. In such cases,
the project work shall be jointly supervised by a supervisor of the department and an
expert as a joint supervisor from the organisation and the student student shall be
instructed to meet the supervisor periodically and to attend the review committee
meetings for evaluating the progress.
 If a candidate fails to submit the project report on or before the specified deadline, he/
She is deemed to have failed in the project work and shall re-enrol for the same in a
subsequent semester
 Failure to meet the project guide or project coordinator will lead to reduction of marks
in the subsequent reviews.
 There shall be three reviews during the semester by the review committee. The total
marks obtained in the three reviews shall be reduced for 20 marks and rounded to the
nearest integer.
  Every batch member should be present for the project review. If a single student fails
to appear for the review the entire batch will not be allowed to present their project in
the review.
 The project batch should make a power point presentation and present their reviews.
The presentation should be presented to their respective guides in advance.
 Each presentation will be for 10 minutes ( to be decided by the project committee at
the initial stages and 20 for the final stages including a demonstration
 A report in word document should be prepared for each review. The report should be
duly approved and countersigned by the respective guide before submitting it at the
time of review. Reports not approved by the guide will not be accepted and the batch
will not be allowed to present in the review.
 Note: Hand-outs of the power Point presentation must not be submitted as the project
Report.
 Marks are awarded to each student of the project group based on the individual
performance in the reviews.
 Any number of re-reviews can happen depending on the discretion of the project
coordinator and project committee and it should happen within the prescribed time.
Note: Projects which are pure survey reports, with no supporting implementation or
theory, are not acceptable.
 Project report/Thesis to be prepared as per the guidelines and format given by Anna
University.
 Absenteeism of reviews will not be entertained for any reasons.

Signature of Students Signature of Project Co-ordinator

 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS
(Expectation from students for each review)

ZEROTH FIRST REVIEW SECOND REVIEW THIRD REVIEW

REVIEW

Abstract Abstract Abstract Abstract

Introduction Block Diagram of Detailed Design Overall Design

the proposed
System

Literature Survey Flow Chart, Contribution of the Experimental

Algorithms(if candidate Results
necessary)

Proposed System Expected outcomes Results Performance

Obtained(Intermediate) Evaluation

References 20% of Project 60% of Project Contribution of the

implementation implementation Project

References References References

100% of Project
implementation-
Demo

Note:
 The presentation should have maximum of 15 slides
 Presentation will be for 15 minutes
 All three reviews are compulsory
 PROJECT DIARY

A. Action Plan
S.No Major Target Actual Reason for Remarks Signature
Activities Date Date the delay if of guide
any

Date: Signature of the Guide

 PROJECT DIARY
A. Attendance

Attendance
Name of Date
the Remarks
student

Signature
of guide

Attendance
Name of Date
the Remarks
student

Signature
of guide

Attendance
Name of Date
the Remarks
student

Signature
of guide
 PROJECT DIARY
B. Attendance

Attendance
Name of Date
the Remarks
student

Signature
of guide

Attendance
Name of Date Remarks
the
student

Signature
of guide

Attendance
Name of Date
the Remarks
student

Signature
of guide
 PROJECT DIARY

C.PROGRESS OF THE WORK

Date Details of Work Done Signature of Guide Remarks

 ZEROTH REVIEW
GUIDELINES
Date of review;
Supervisor Remarks:
Seminar Presentation material was shown by the students on--------------. I have gone through
the progress of the work and the presentation. The suggestion made by me were incorporated
in the presentation

RECOMMENDED FOR PRESENTATION Supervisor Signature

ZEROTH REVIEW EVALUATION SHEET

S.No Name Register Mark Allocation

of the No
Technical Content
Literature Review

student
Presentation
Innovation

Total
30 30 20 20 100

Remarks of the Evaluators (comments and Major Weaknesses Identifies):

Signature of the Evaluators Project Coordinator

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
FEEDBACKS

DATE/DAY MEMBERS FEEDBACK SIGNATURE

Panel Member I

Panel Member II

Panel Member
III(Project Co-
ordinator)

Remarks of the HOD:

Signature of HOD
 FIRST REVIEW APPROVAL
Date of Review:
Supervisor Remarks:
Seminar Presentation Material was shown by the students on----------------.I have gone
through the progress of the work and the presentation. The suggestions given in the zeroth
review and by the supervisor were incorporated in the presentation.

RECOMMENDED FOR PRESENTATION Supervisor

Signature

FIRST REVIEW EVALUATION SHEET

S.No Name Register Mark Allocation
of the No
Technical Content

student Progress Report

Presentation

Innovation
Result and

Review-I
Total
30 30 20 20 100 5

Remarks of the Evaluators (Comments and Major Weaknesses Identified):

Signature of the Evaluators Project Coordinator

1.
2.
3.
4.
FEEDBACKS

DATE/DAY MEMBERS FEEDBACK SIGNATURE

Panel Member I

Panel Member II

Panel Member III

(Project Co-
ordinator)

Remarks of the HOD:

Signature of HOD
 SECOND REVIEW APPROVAL
Date of Review:
Supervisor Remarks:
Seminar Presentation Material was shown by the students on----------------.I have gone
through the progress of the work and the presentation. The suggestions given in the first
review and by the supervisor were incorporated in the presentation.

RECOMMENDED FOR PRESENTATION Supervisor

Signature

SECOND REVIEW EVALUATION SHEET

S.No Name Register Mark Allocation
of the No
Technical Content

student Progress Report

Presentation

Innovation
Result and

Review-II
Total
30 30 20 20 100 7.5

Remarks of the Evaluators (Comments and Major Weaknesses Identified):

Signature of the Evaluators Project Coordinator

1.
2.
3.
4.
FEEDBACKS

DATE/DAY MEMBERS FEEDBACK SIGNATURE

Panel Member I

Panel Member II

Panel Member III

(Project Co-
ordinator)

Remarks of the HOD:

Signature of HOD
 THIRD REVIEW APPROVAL
Date of Review:
Supervisor Remarks:
Project report/Seminar Presentation Material was shown by the students on----------------.I
have gone through the progress of the work and the presentation. The suggestions given in
the second review and by the supervisor were incorporated in the presentation. Subsequently
I have verified the project report chapter wise and it is prepared as per Anna University
guidelines.

RECOMMENDED FOR PRESENTATION Supervisor

Signature

THIRD REVIEW EVALUATION SHEET

S.No Name of Register Mark Allocation

the No
Technical Content

student
Progress Report
Presentation

Review-III
Innovation
Result and

Total

30 30 20 20 100 7.5

Remarks of the Evaluators (Comments and Major Weaknesses Identified):

Signature of the Evaluators Project Coordinator

1.
2.
3.
4.
FEEDBACKS
DATE/DAY MEMBERS FEEDBACK SIGNATURE
Panel Member I

Panel Member II

Panel Member
III(Project Co-
ordinator)

Remarks of the Evaluators

a) Can this work be published in conference/Journal : YES/NO
b) Can this work be patented : YES/NO
c) Can this work be further enhanced for project proposal : YES/NO

Signature of the Evaluators Project Coordinator

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Signature of HOD