2000 GA Annual Review Data
2000 GA Annual Review Data
Page 1
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 2
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 3
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 4
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 5
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 6
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 7
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 8
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 9
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 10
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 11
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 12
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 13
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 14
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 15
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 16
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 17
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 18
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 19
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 20
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 21
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 22
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 23
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 24
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 25
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 26
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 27
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 28
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 29
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 30
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 31
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 32
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 33
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 34
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 35
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 36
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 37
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 38
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 39
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 40
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 41
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 42
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 43
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 44
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 45
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 46
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 47
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 48
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 49
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 50
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 51
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 52
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 53
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 54
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 55
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 56
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 57
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 58
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 59
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 60
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 61
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 62
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 63
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 64
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 65
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 66
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 67
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 68
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 69
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 70
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 71
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 72
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 73
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 74
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 75
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 76
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 77
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 78
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 79
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 80
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 81
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 82
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 83
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 84
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 85
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 86
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 87
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 88
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 89
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 90
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 91
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 92
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 93
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 94
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 95
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 96
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 97
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 98
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 99
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 100
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 101
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 102
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 103
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 104
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 105
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 106
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 107
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 108
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 109
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 110
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 111
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 112
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 113
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 114
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 115
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 116
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 117
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 118
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
2 Airframe/component/systTAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 Loss of control - in flight TAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 Loss of engine power (toTAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 Loss of engine power (toCRUISE
1 Loss of control - in flight LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 In flight collision with ob MANEUVERING - AERIAL
2 Overrun LANDING - ROLL
1 Loss of engine power (paTAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 In flight collision with ob MANEUVERING - AERIAL
1 In flight collision with ob MANEUVERING
1 Loss of control - on gro TAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 Loss of engine power (paTAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 Loss of engine power (paCRUISE - NORMAL
1 Loss of engine power CRUISE
1 In flight collision with ob TAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 Midair collision APPROACH
Page 119
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 120
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 121
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 122
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
1 Airframe/component/systDESCENT - NORMAL
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING - ROLL
1 TAXI - TO TAKEOFF
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING - ROLL
1 Loss of engine power (toCLIMB - TO CRUISE
2 Airframe/component/systUNKNOWN
1 Loss of engine power (toTAKEOFF
2 Hard landing LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 Airframe/component/systMANEUVERING
1 Loss of engine power (toCRUISE
1 Hard landing LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 Loss of engine power CRUISE
1 In flight collision with t APPROACH - VFR PATTER
1 Loss of engine power (paTAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 Loss of engine power (toMANEUVERING - AERIAL
1 On ground/water encounTAKEOFF
1 Miscellaneous/other TAKEOFF
1 In flight encounter with CRUISE - NORMAL
1 Loss of engine power TAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 In flight collision with t CRUISE
1 Loss of control - in flight TAKEOFF
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING - ROLL
1 Airframe/component/systLANDING - FLARE/TOU
Gear collapsed LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 Loss of control - in flight CRUISE
Page 123
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 124
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 125
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
1 Amateur-Built Airframe/component/systCLIMB
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING - ROLL
1 Loss of engine power GO-AROUND (VFR)
1 Loss of engine power (toAPPROACH
1 Hard landing LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 Miscellaneous/other CLIMB - TO CRUISE
1 Loss of control - on gro TAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
Amateur-Built Airframe/component/systCRUISE
1 On ground/water collisio TAXI - TO TAKEOFF
1 Loss of engine power CRUISE
1 Loss of engine power (toCLIMB - TO CRUISE
1 Amateur-Built Loss of engine power CRUISE
2 Loss of control - on gro GO-AROUND (VFR)
1 Loss of engine power CLIMB - TO CRUISE
1 Amateur-Built Loss of engine power MANEUVERING
1 Loss of engine power (paMANEUVERING - AERIAL
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 Loss of engine power APPROACH - VFR PATTER
1 In flight collision with ob TAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 Miscellaneous/other STANDING - PRE-FLIGHT
2 Loss of engine power MANEUVERING
1 Loss of engine power MANEUVERING - AERIAL
1 Loss of control - in flight LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 Loss of engine power CRUISE
1 Amateur-Built Loss of engine power (toCRUISE
1 Amateur-Built Nose over LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 Amateur-Built Loss of control - in flight TAKEOFF
1 Loss of engine power CRUISE
1 Loss of engine power (toCRUISE
1 Loss of engine power MANEUVERING
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING - ROLL
1 Loss of engine power (toCRUISE - NORMAL
Page 126
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
1 Airframe/component/systMANEUVERING - AERIAL
1 In flight collision with t MANEUVERING - AERIAL
1 Loss of control - on gro TAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 Loss of control - in flight HOVER - IN GROUND EF
2 In flight collision with ob DESCENT
2 Ditching CRUISE
1 Loss of control - in flight GO-AROUND (VFR)
2 In flight collision with ob LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 Propeller blast or jet ex STANDING - ENGINE(S)
Hard landing LANDING
1 Amateur-Built Loss of engine power (paTAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 Airframe/component/systMANEUVERING
1 Hard landing DESCENT - UNCONTROL
1 Amateur-Built Loss of control - in flight UNKNOWN
1 Loss of control - on gro TAXI - TO TAKEOFF
1 Midair collision CRUISE - NORMAL
1 In flight collision with ob CRUISE
2 In flight collision with ob CRUISE - NORMAL
1 Airframe/component/systAPPROACH
1 Loss of engine power (toMANEUVERING - AERIAL
1 Loss of control - in flight APPROACH - VFR PATTER
1 Midair collision MANEUVERING
1 Amateur-Built Loss of control - on gro LANDING - ROLL
1 On ground/water encounTAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING - ROLL
1 Nose over LANDING - ROLL
1 Amateur-Built In flight collision with t APPROACH - VFR PATTER
On ground/water encounSTANDING
1 In flight collision with ob TAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 Amateur-Built Loss of control - in flight TAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
Page 127
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 128
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 129
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 130
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 131
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 132
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 133
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 134
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 135
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 136
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 137
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 138
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 139
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 140
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 141
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
1 Miscellaneous/other UNKNOWN
1 Loss of control - in flight CRUISE
1 Amateur-Built Loss of control - in flight APPROACH - VFR PATTER
1 Main gear collapsed LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING
1 Loss of control - in flight MANEUVERING
In flight encounter with APPROACH
2 Loss of control - in flight MANEUVERING
1 Loss of engine power TAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING - ROLL
1 Amateur-Built Airframe/component/systAPPROACH - VFR PATTER
1 Amateur-Built Airframe/component/systMANEUVERING
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING - ROLL
1 On ground/water collisio LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 In flight collision with ob MANEUVERING - AERIAL
2 Fire TAXI - FROM LANDING
1 Fire MANEUVERING - AERIAL
2 In flight encounter with DESCENT
1 Undershoot LANDING
1 Loss of control - in flight APPROACH - VFR PATTER
2 On ground/water collisio TAKEOFF - ABORTED
1 In flight encounter with MANEUVERING
1 Loss of engine power (toCLIMB - TO CRUISE
1 In flight collision with ob CRUISE
1 Loss of control - in flight TAKEOFF
1 Wheels up landing LANDING
1 Loss of engine power MANEUVERING - AERIAL
1 Loss of engine power APPROACH
2 On ground/water collisio TAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 Hard landing APPROACH - VFR PATTER
1 Amateur-Built Loss of engine power TAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 Loss of control - on gro TAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 Nose over TAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING - ROLL
1 Loss of control - in flight LANDING - ABORTED
1 Loss of control - on gro LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 In flight collision with ob MANEUVERING
1 In flight collision with ob TAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 Loss of control - in flight GO-AROUND (VFR)
2 Loss of control - in flight APPROACH - CIRCLING (I
1 Loss of engine power (toTAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 Amateur-Built In flight collision with ob MANEUVERING
1 Loss of engine power TAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
1 Loss of engine power (toCRUISE
1 In flight collision with t TAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 Amateur-Built Hard landing LANDING - FLARE/TOU
Loss of engine power (toMANEUVERING - AERIAL
1 Dragged wing, rotor, pod, TAKEOFF
1 Dragged wing, rotor, pod, TAKEOFF - ROLL/RUN
1 In flight collision with t LANDING - ABORTED
Page 142
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 143
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
1 Airframe/component/systCLIMB - TO CRUISE
1 Hard landing LANDING - FLARE/TOU
1 In flight collision with t OTHER
Page 144
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 145
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 146
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 147
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
1 Overrun LANDING
1 On ground/water collisio LANDING - ROLL
1 Loss of control - in flight TAKEOFF - INITIAL CLIMB
Page 148
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 149
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 150
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 151
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 152
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 153
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
IFR 4 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
VFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFIF 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
Page 154
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 2
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
CVFR Midair 4 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Midair 4 0
NONE 1 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE Midair 3 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE Midair 3 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 2 0
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
IFR 4 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE Midair
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 155
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
CVFR 0 0
NONE Midair
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE Midair 1 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
IFR
NONE 0 0
NONE
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 1 0
IFR 3 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 1
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 1
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 156
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1
NONE Ground Collision 4 0
NONE Ground Collision 4 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
CVFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR Midair 0 0
Page 157
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 3 0
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
CVFR 1 0
VFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 1 0
Page 158
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 159
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
IFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 3 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
IFR 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 160
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
IFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 1 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 3 0
NONE 0 1
VFR 1 0
CVFR 7 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
IFR
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE
NONE
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 5 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 2 0
Page 161
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 2 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
VFR 0 2
NONE
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 3 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
IFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 4 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 4
NONE 1 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 3 0
Page 162
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
IFR
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
MVFR 0 1
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 2 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
CVFR 0 0
IFR 6 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
IFR 6 0
NONE 0 0
Page 163
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
CVFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 1
VFR 3 0
NONE 0 1
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 164
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
IFR 0 0
NONE Midair 2 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 1
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Midair 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 3 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Midair 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFIF 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE Midair 2 0
CVFR 2 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 3 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 165
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 3 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE
NONE 0 1
CVFR 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 4
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 4
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
VFR 2 0
NONE 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 166
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 3
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 167
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 168
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
CVFR 1 1
NONE Midair 4 0
NONE 0 0
IFR Midair 4 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 169
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
IFR 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 1 0
UNK 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 2
UNK 0 0
Page 170
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 3 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
VFR 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
VFR 4 0
NONE 1 0
IFR 3 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 4 0
Page 171
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 3 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 3
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
VFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE 0 0
UNK Ground Collision 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 172
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 1 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 1 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
Page 173
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 3 0
NONE 0 1
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
IFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 1 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 4 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 2 0
NONE 0 3
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
Page 174
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 1
VFR 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
IFR 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 3 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
Page 175
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
UNK Midair 11 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 3 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE Midair 0 0
VFR Ground Collision 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 2 2
NONE 0 1
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 3
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 3 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
Page 176
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 2 2
NONE 1 0
CVFR 0 1
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 3 0
NONE 2 2
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2
IFR 2 1
NONE
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 4 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 177
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 3 0
NONE 3 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
Page 178
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 1 0
NONE Midair 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 2 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 2
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 2 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
IFR 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 1
IFR 4 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 2 2
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
IFR 4 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 179
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
UNK 0 0
IFR 3 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
IFR 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 1 1
Page 180
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 3
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE Midair 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE Midair 2 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
VFR Ground Collision 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
Page 181
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 1
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 1
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE
VFR 3 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 0 0
NONE
Page 182
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
VFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 1 3
NONE 4 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 1
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
IFR 0 1
NONE 0 1
IFR 1 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 1 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 4 0
IFR 2 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
Page 183
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 0 1
IFR 1 1
NONE 0 1
NONE
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 3 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1
NONE 0 1
NONE 2 0
VFR 0 0
VFR 6 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 1 3
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
IFR 3 0
IFR Midair 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1
Page 184
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 1
NONE 2 0
IFR 1 0
NONE 3 1
VFR 0 1
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 3
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
VFR 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 2 0
IFR 2 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 1
IFR 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
IFR 2 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 1 0
VFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
Page 185
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
UNK 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE
IFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 1
NONE
VFR
IFR 0 1
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
VFR 0 0
NONE
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
IFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
Page 186
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
VFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Midair 1 0
NONE 0 0
VFR
VFIF Midair 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 1
CVFR 0 0
IFR 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
VFR 0 1
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 2
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Midair 1 0
IFR 3 0
NONE 0 1
VFR 0 0
NONE Midair 1 0
IFR 0 0
Page 187
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
IFR 4 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 1
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
IFR 2 0
NONE 1
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 3 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 2 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
IFR 2 0
VFR 0 2
NONE 1 0
Page 188
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 1 0
NONE 2
NONE 0 0
IFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 1 0
NONE Ground Collision 0 0
NONE 2
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 1
IFR
VFR 2 0
NONE 0 0
IFR 0 0
NONE
IFR 2
NONE 0 0
CVFR 0 0
VFR 0 0
NONE 0 1
NONE 0 0
NONE
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 2 0
IFR 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE 0 0
NONE
NONE 0 0
Page 189
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
NONE
NONE
VFR 2 0
IFR
CVFR 2 1
VFR
CVFR 1 0
NONE 0 0
NONE
IFR 4 0
NONE
NONE
Page 190
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 191
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 6 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 0 0 0
Page 192
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
2 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
3 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
Page 193
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 2 0 0
3 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1
1 1 0 0
1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 3 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
5 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
Page 194
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
2 1 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
Page 195
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 3 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 4 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
3 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 4 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Page 196
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 5 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 1 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
Page 197
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 6 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 5 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
4 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
Page 198
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 6 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
2
2 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1
1
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
Page 199
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
2
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Page 200
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
2 0 0 0
2
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
3 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
Page 201
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
2 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
Page 202
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 5 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
Page 203
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 4 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
Page 204
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
Page 205
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 7 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 5 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
1
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
2 9 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
Page 206
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 1 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
3 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
Page 207
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
2 3 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 7 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
Page 208
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 2
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
Page 209
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 7 0 0
4 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 6 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 5 0 0
0 4 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
1 0 0 0
Page 210
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
Page 211
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
1 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 6 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 5 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 5 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
Page 212
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
3 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 5 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Page 213
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 8 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 6 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
1 0 0 1
Page 214
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0
2 0 0 0
1
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
Page 215
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 2 0 0
Page 216
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 2 0 0
0 4 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
Page 217
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 11 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
1 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 0 0 0
Page 218
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 11 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
2 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Page 219
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0
Page 220
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 4 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
Page 221
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
3 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 6 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 1
Page 222
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
Page 223
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
1
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2
1
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 5 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 3 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Page 224
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
2
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 5 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
3
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 3 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
Page 225
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
1 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
Page 226
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0
1 1 0 0
0 6 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
2 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 4 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
1
0 2 0 0
2 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 0 0 0
1
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 3 0 0
2
0 2 0 0
3 0 0 0
0 4 0 0
1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
1
2 0 0 0
0 2 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 3 0 0
0 1 0 0
0 2 0 0
4 0 0 0
1
0 1 0 0
Page 227
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
1
1
0 0 0 0
2
1
0 0 0 0
0 1 0 0
2
0 0 0 0
1
1
Page 228
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 229
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The pilot requested and the failure of the pilot to follow his approach clearance, and su
0 The helicopter was engag The fuel system contamination that resulted in a loss of engin
0 The pilot said that the The pilot's failure to correct the descent, and his failure to ma
0 The pilot said he flew t the pilot's improperly performed flare.
0 The pilot stated that whiFailure for undetermined reasons of the right main landing ge
0 The pilot reported that The failure of the crankshaft drive gear as a result of fatigue, w
0 According to the pilot, A total loss of engine power due to turbine wheel fracture resu
0 The pilot was seated in tThe pilot's improper decision to attempt to close the pilot's do
0 The pilot stated that du The pilot's delay in aborting the takeoff. A factor was the ope
0 A few minutes after takeA blocked crankcase breather line due to ice and improper ma
0 The purpose of the fligh Failure of the pilot to maintain directional control of the airpla
0 The airplane experiencedThe pilot's improper approach planning, which resulted in a do
0 The private pilot radioedThe pilot's failure to maintain airspeed while maneuvering in t
0 While approaching the aiThe pilot's evasive maneuver during landing roll due to panic
0 The pilot made a forced The loss of engine power during cruise flight for unknown reas
0 The instructor took his f Failure of the pilot to maintain control after encountering a dy
0 The commercial pilot plaThe pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during landing ro
0 Witnesses reported that the pilot's failure to maintain the minimum controllable airspe
0 According to the CFI's wrThe proper alignment not being maintained by the dual studen
0
0 After landing to refuel, The pilot's failure to adequately remove ice and snow from the
0 The flight departed for The dual student's improper use of the throttles; the flight inst
0 The pilot reported the r the pilot's disregard of the unsafe runway condition, his decisi
0 During preflight inspect The pilot's failure to remove ice from the wings prior to takeoff
0 The airplane's engine waThe loss of engine power due to a crack in the #6 cylinder. A
0 The pilot stated that wh The failure of the pilot to maintain directional control of the ai
0 The pilot was attemptingThe inadvertent porpoise and improper remedial action of the
0 The pilot took off from The pilot's inadequate clearance while maneuvering beneath
0 The pilot reported that The failure of the pilot to deice the airplane prior to departure
0 The student completed aiThe partial loss of engine power due to undetermined reasons
0 Freezing rain, mist, and The diminished effectiveness of the anti-skid brake system du
0 The helicopter's mission The failure of the pilot to maintain main rotor rpm, which resu
0 The airplane had been exp The pilot's inadequate preflight inspection.
0 The pilot stated that he The failure of the pilot to obtain winds aloft for the planned cro
0 While inbound for landing The pilot's inadequate preflight planning in that he did not per
0 While in level flight ap Failure of the main rotor mast due to fatigue that resulted from
0 During landing approachThe student's failure to maintain directional control after enco
0 The pilot planned a nonstFuel exhaustion due to the pilot's inadequate en route fuel con
0 The pilot became disorien The pilot's misinterpretation of his VOR navigation indicator, w
0 While on short-final to a The pilot's improper decision to attempt a go-around, then att
0 The pilot stated that aft The on-ground fire caused by fuel flowing out the fuel vent an
0 The flight instructor sta The dual student's loss of directional control and the flight ins
0 The pilot was spraying s Failure of the engine due to improper installation of the intake
0 The pilot and passenger The pilot's failure to use carburetor heat, resulting in a loss of
0 The commercial pilot wasThe pilot's improper compensation for wind conditions during
0 To prepare the student piThe student pilot's excessive remedial action (banking to reali
0 The accident airplane imthe instructor pilot not performing remedial action on the stud
0 The flight was on an IF The pilot's failure to use carburetor heat in a timely manner w
0 According to the pilot, a The pilot's failure to maintain directional and altitude control o
0 After leaving his workpl The pilot's failure to maintain clearance with trees during an in
Page 230
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The pilot departed runway The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane during ta
0 At the time of the pilot The pilot's improper use of the brakes during the landing rollo
0 The owner flew the airplaThe pilot's failure to maintain an adequate airspeed, which res
0 As the airplane took off, The pilot inadvertently allowing the airplane to stall. Factors w
0 The airplane was substant The pilot failed to maintain directional control during the takeo
0 While landing, the stude The CFI's delay in remedial action after the student pilot lost c
0 On the first mission, the A loss of power in the right engine due to undetermined reaso
0 According to the pilot, The pilot's inadequate compensation for the existing crosswin
0 At 0948:48, a homebuilt The pilots' inadequate visual lookout in visual conditions and c
0 The aircraft was on an agThe pilot's failure to maintain sufficient altitude over, or cleara
0 The student pilot was la The student pilot's failure to maintain directional control. A fa
0 The student pilot stated The student pilot's failure to maintain directional control durin
0 While over the thresholdThe improper recovery from the bounced landing by the pilot-
0 The green nose gear lighthe fracture across the eyelet of the nose gear retraction rod,
0 The student pilot was praFailure of the student pilot to maintain directional control of th
0 At 0948:48, a homebuilt The pilots' inadequate visual lookout in visual conditions and c
0 During cruise flight, ab The pilot's inadequate weather evaluation and continued visua
0 The flight instructor, se Failure of the pilot in command to maintain directional control
0 At 1455:29, the pilot of Clearance not maintained by the pilot of the other airplane. A
0 The pilot stated after p The failure of the pilot to retract the flaps from the fully exten
0 The pilot was attemptingthe pilot's attempt to go-around with inadequate altitude and
0 The student pilot made sthe seizure of the engine while maneuvering due to the oil pre
0 At 1455:29, the pilot of The pilot's failure to maintain clearance from the other airplan
0 The airplane engine lost the pilot's inadequate fuel consumption calculation. Factors w
0 The pilot reported he waThe pilot's selection of an unsuitable landing site on a frozen,
0 The pilot stated that wh chafed wiring that resulted in an electrical short which initiate
0 The student pilot complet the student pilot's failure to maintain directional control during
0 According to the pilot's inadequate aircraft preflight by the pilot and fuel consumption
0 Upon arriving at the de The pilot's failure to maintain a safe altitude and his failure to
0 While performing a visualThe flight instructors inadequate supervision of a dual student
0
0 The pilot departed Flori The pilot's continued flight from visual flight rules into instrum
0 The pilot of the helicopt The pilot's failure to roll throttle back on (return the power to
0 The narrative is the sa The pilot's failure to maintain visual lookout during flight opera
0 The airplane touched dow The pilot's loss of control of the airplane during the landing.
0 The pilot said that on h The pilot's failure to adequately compensate for wind conditio
0 The aircraft impacted te the pilots improper use of powerplant controls. A factor in the
0 According to eyewitnesse The of other aircraft pilot's failure to maintain proper visual loo
0 The pilot of N9796Y callethe non-instrumented rated pilot elected to takeoff into known
0 The student pilot said hethe student pilot's loss of directional control during the takeoff
0 On final approach at the The loss of engine power due to fuel system contamination. A
0 The pilot reported he el was a delayed decision of the pilot to abort the landing. Facto
0 The pilot filed an IFR f The pilot's failure to maintain airspeed during a climb, which r
0 On the third flight of th
0 During his preflight wea The pilot's attempted flight into known adverse weather after
0 The single-engine airplanThe pilot's failure to refuel resulting in fuel exhaustion and a t
0 A low wing Piper was in The inadequate visual lookout by the pilots of both airplanes.
0 A high-wing airplane andthe failure of both flight crews to see and avoid the other airpl
0 A low wing Piper was in The inadequate visual lookout by the pilots of both airplanes.
0 The pilot had landed to rthe pilot's failure to verify that ground personnel had disconne
Page 231
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The aircraft collided wi The company mechanic's failure to correctly install one or mo
0 A high-wing airplane andthe failure of both flight crews to see and avoid the other airpl
0 The Local Air Traffic Co The S76 helicopter pilot's failure to follow ATC landing sequen
0 The student pilot report Directional control was not maintained. Inadequate remedial
0 After departure, at an a Engine failure due to the disconnection of the intake manifold
0 At an altitude of about 2 the pilot's failure to maintain control of the helicopter during a
0 Fuel levels in both fuel failure of the pilot to comply with the checklists in the Owner's
0 The pilot of the Cessna The failure of both pilots to maintain visual lookout while man
0 The commercial certificatThe pilot's selection of unsuitable terrain for landing. Factors
0 While on a long cross-cou Exhaustion of the fuel supply due to a leaking fuel tank system
The pilot did not check The pilot's decision to land on a runway that was covered with
0 The pilot reported that he and the observer were planning to conduct tuna spotting op
0 The single engine aerial
0 While on approach the glithe pilot planned the approach too low, which resulted in inad
0 The pilot attempted to taThe delayed aborted takeoff by the pilot. Factors were the pil
0 The pilot reported that hThe pilot's inadequate pre-flight planning resulting in a total lo
0 The pilot had approacheda collision with a fence while at a hover, which resulted in the
0 Upon landing, the aircra the pilots failure to maintain directional control of the aircraft.
0 The gyrocopter nosed ove the pilot's poor inflight planning in that he turned into a tailwin
0 A passenger deplaned, wal the passenger not maintaining clearance from the rotating pro
0 According to the pilot, The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the lan
0 The pilot collided with The pilot's inadequate visual lookout while maneuvering in pro
0 The pilot was performingFailure of the pilot to maintain control of the aircraft during a c
0 The airplane veered off the directional control not obtained/maintained by the dual stu
0 The airplane exited the lThe student pilot's failure to maintain directional control. Fact
0 The pilot stated that he The pilot-in-command attempted a low pass and misjudged hi
0 Prior to departure, the f the flight instructor's inadequate compensation for the wind c
0 The pilot entered downwiA total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation for und eter
0 The pilot departed Wicken The pilot's inadequate fuel management, his inaccurate fuel c
0 The instrument rated priv The pilot's improper preflight planning/preparation in that he i
0 The twin engine airplanethe pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during the missed
0 A witness to the accidentaircraft control not being maintained by the pilot during the at
0 The pilot reported he waThe pilot's selection of an unsuitable taxi area. A factor assoc
0 The pilot stated he landeThe pilot's failure to maintain a visual lookout while repo sition
0 At the completion of a l The failure and separation of the right landing gear axle durin
0 The vintage airplane wasthe total failure of the engine number 1 cylinder exhaust valve
0 Upon returning to the hoThe pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during landing. A
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's failure to maintain control of the aircraft during lan
0 Upon arrival at the dest The pilot's failure to maintain clearance with a fence during th
0 The pilot performed an eThe pilot not following procedures in that he did not periodical
0 Approaching runway 26, The t pilot's selection of a final approach airspeed in variance w
0 The airplane impacted tethe go-around not performed, the improper flare, and recover
0 The airplane impacted a the improper major overhaul of the engine by company maint
0 The student pilot said t the student pilot's improper preflight that resulted in his opera
0 The pilot stated he appl Total loss of engine power for undetermined reasons on appr o
0 The pilot was conductingThe pilot's improper use of flight controls (cyclic and col lectiv
0 The multi-engine centerlwas the pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane after
0 After receiving serious i The pilot's improper decision to attempt a flight on minimal fu
0
0 During the landing on run
The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during landing. A
Page 232
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 Approximately 35 minutes The owner/builder's failure to build the airplane within the des
0 While landing on runwayThe 1 pilot's failure to maintain directional control while landing
0 The landing gear collapsThe failure of the landing gear for undetermined reasons to go
0 A Cessna 210 sustained sthe inadequate maintenance inspection prior to the ferry fligh
0 Prior to departure, the a The pilot's failure to land sooner to refuel, resulting in a power
0 The Sky 6 pilot was ret The pilot's ostentatious display and in-flight decision to perfor
0 The flight instructor rep Aircraft control was not maintained. Inadequate remedial acti
0 The pilot departed and f The pilot inadvertently selecting the mixture control to off, res
0 The glider was towed to 3 the encountering of wind conditions in flight that inhibited the
0 While landing on RunwayThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control during landin
0 The airplane landed apprThe pilot's failure to obtain/maintain the proper visual glide pa
0 The pilot reported there fuel starvation due to an undetermined blockage in the fuel lin
0 The day before the fligh The maintenance personnel inadequate inspection of the fuel
0 The pilot stated that he The pilot's failure to use the checklist, resulting in a wheels-up
0 The private certificated The pilot's inadvertent ground loop.
0 The private certificated The pilot's selection of unsuitable terrain for takeoff. Factors i
0 The pilot reported exper Failure of a connecting rod for undetermined reasons. Factors
0 The pilots of the flight In-flight collision with terrain for undetermined reasons.
0 The pilot was performingThe pilot's improper use of flight controls during an emergenc
0 Twenty minutes after takLoss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 The pilot was repositioni The contamination of the aircraft's fuel. Contributing factors w
0 The pilot reported that aA loose seat latch which permitted the seat to move aft to a p
0 During landing rollout o The failure of the pilot-in-command to maintain directional con
0 The pilot landed the singThe pilot's failure to use carburetor heat, which resulted in a lo
0 The aircraft, equipped wThe pilot's inadvertent landing on water with the wheels of the
0 During a low altitude fli The pilot's performance of low altitude flight and his failure to
0 The helicopter took off The pilot's inadequate checklist procedure prior to departure,
0 At 1024:46, the pilot of The failure of the supervisor/ground controller and the local co
0 At 1024:46, the pilot of The failure of the supervisor/ground controller and the local co
0 The pilot planned a 265 The failure of the pilot to refuel the airplane which resulted in
0 The pilot reported there the pilot's decision to fly into known adverse weather conditio
0 The pilot, who was flyingThe pilot's failure to adequately compensate for changing win
0 Several attempts were mad The failure of the pilot to initiate a go-around after the airplan
0
0 During takeoff roll, at 8 The separation of the right main landing gear tire tread which
0 The pilot landed the heli The pilot's selection of an inadequate takeoff area which precl
0 A witness observed the athe loss of engine power resulting from fuel starvation due to
0 During a solo cross-countFuel exhaustion due to the student pilot becoming lost/disorie
0 The pilot reported that the pilot's inability to flare the airplane during landing and the
0 The pilot was flying low Failure of the pilot to see wires and maintain clearance while fl
0 The airplane departed PrThe pilot not following the airplane manufacturer's recommen
0 The pilot received his p A loss of engine power due to low cylinder compression from a
0 Witnesses reported that The pilot's failure to maintain sufficient altitude over, or cleara
0 The pilot had been maneu failure of the pilot to maintain clearance from power lines whil
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the tak
0 During the takeoff roll, The failure of the left magneto, which resulted in the partial lo
0 En route from the airstri The cracked #8 cylinder resulting in failure of the cylinder. A
0 The airplane was flying The loss of engine power for an undetermined reason, which r
0 As the pilot approached The pilot's failure to abort the landing in a timely manner. Fac
0 The pilot of the Cessna the failure of both pilots to maintain an adequate visual lookou
Page 233
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The pilot of the Cessna the failure of both pilots to maintain an adequate visual lookou
0 The helicopter hit a tra An undetermined electrical system voltage surge.
0 The airplane had just ta Loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. A factor was
0 The student pilot stated the flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the student pi
0 A witness observed the ai The pilot's improper judgment and his failure to maintain clea
0 The purpose of the fligh The pilot misjudging the flare. Factors were dark night condit
0 The pilot performed a 'stThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the tailwhe
0 The private pilot was la The pilot's failure to adequately compensate for wind conditio
0 The pilots had been pracInadvertent landing gear retraction by person(s) undetermined
2 Prior to departure, the
0 While climbing after tak The pilot's improper collective and cyclic control usage during
0 While the dual student wThe flight instructors inadequate supervision of the dual stude
0 The pilot contacted his the inadvertent stall. Factors relating to this accident were th
0 The flight instructor and the improper entry into the traffic pattern by the pilot of the P
0 The pilot was giving an a power loss over unsuitable terrain, for undetermined reason
0 The pilot reported that, The failure of the pilot to maintain directional control of the ai
0 The flight instructor and the improper entry into the traffic pattern by the pilot of the P
0 The St. Patrick's Balloo The pilot's decision not to deflate the envelope. A factor was
0 The pilot reported he was the pilot inadvertently retracted the landing gear instead of th
0 The pilot was making an Thea pilot's inadequate compensation for the gusty wind condit
0 The day before the accidThe pilot's improper decision to operate the airplane with know
0 While performing aerial The pilots inadequate visual outlook while performing aerial a
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's failure to ensure that the landing gear was lowered
0 The twin-engine helicoptthe in-flight separation of the main rotor mast while in cruise fl
0 The newly certificated p The pilot's inadvertent stall during an attempted go-around. A
0 The pilot said that he h a loss of engine power during climb due to fuel starvation whic
0 During climb shortly aft The pilot's failure to maintain control of the aircraft while mak
0 The airplane had just recthe failure of maintenance personnel to properly install and co
0 The private pilot was lanThe pilot's failure to adequately compensate for wind conditio
0 The airplane was substan Failure to maintain terrain clearance. Factors include mounta
0 The pilot stated that winThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control after touchdo
0 According to the PIC, s The PIC's inadequate planning and preparation resulting in ref
0
0 The flight instructor sa The failure of the right engine mixture control cable, which pre
0 The aerobatic airplane i The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control.
0
0 After the pilot taxied on The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane which res
0 During a forced landing iThe fuel control metering unit becoming disengaged and the i
0 For undetermined reasons The pilot's in-flight loss of control for undetermined reasons.
0 During landing roll-out, the pilot's failure to maintain control during landing roll-out. A
0 The flight instructor an the loss of engine power while maneuvering as a result of the
0 During the forced landingThe pilot's inadequate preflight resulting in loss of engine pow
0 The pilot said that shor The pilot's failure to maintain directional control, resulting in a
0 For the second flight of Total failure of an oil line fitting, resulting in oil exhaustion and
0 The pilot was conductingThe pilot's inadequate preflight planning resulting in fuel exha
0 N9570E, an Aeronca 11AC, the pilot of N51933 did not see and maintain clearance from N
0 The pilot and passengersThe pilot's inadequate weather evaluation, and his improper r
0 The amateur-built airpla The loss of engine power for an undetermined reason.
0 The pilot said the winds The pilot inadvertently allowing the airplane to porpoise after
0 The solo instructional f The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control and the subsequ
Page 234
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 N9570E, an Aeronca 11AC, the pilot of N51933 did not see and maintain clearance from N
0 The CFI reported that whithe certified flight instructor's improper use of the mixture con
0 The pilot reported the a an inadequate rate of climb and the failure to attain clearance
0 After landing, the privat The private pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditio
0 The pilot was executing aThe pilot's failure to maintain runway alignment during takeoff
0 The airplane was landingThe pilot's inadequate compensation for the crosswind. A fact
0 After takeoff, two-way c The partial loss of engine power due to undetermined reasons
0 The pilot stated that af The inadvertent stall by the pilot-in-command while on final ap
0 The flight departed wherThe pilot experiencing spatial disorientation while reversing co
0 While hovering out of gr the pilot's failure to land as soon as practical and to utilize the
0 The helicopter was transThe pilot's inadequate in-flight evaluation of the landing area,
0 The flight was approachin the pilot's inadequate in-flight decision to continue a visual ap
0 The CFI was providing fliThe CFI's failure to perform remedial action in a timely manne
0 According to the ground An in-flight loss of control while maneuvering for undetermine
0 Without notifying air tr The in-flight collision with the ground for undetermined reason
0 The gyrocopter was seenFailure of the pilot to obtain/maintain aircraft control. A factor
0 The pilot and passenger The partial loss of engine power for an undetermined reason.
0 The pilot reported that the right main gear brake was binding for an undetermined re
0 The 61-hour pilot was exThe pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during landing. C
0 Prior to departure, the The pilot's improper weather evaluation, and subsequent impr
0 The pilot stated tha The failure of the pilot to maintain clearance between the left
0
0 According to the studentThe instructor pilot's failure to maintain the minimum controlla
0 According to the pilot, Loss of power due to carburetor contamination. Factors, were
0 During the second spray The failure of the pilot to maintain clearance during a spray pa
0 The private pilot and a c The private pilots failure to obtain the proper touchdown point
0 The flight instructor and a loss of control for undetermined reason(s).
0 After takeoff, the airpl undetermined. The pilot's failure to reject the takeoff and his
0 After practicing touch a the CFI's improper use of the throttle control during a simulate
0 The purpose of the flightthe foreign object (shot gun shell) which jammed the control s
0 The pilot reported that Disintegration of a lining of the right brake and subsequent lod
0 During a stop and go lanthe pilot's failure to maintain control during landing roll. A fac
0 During the takeoff climb The loss of engine power for reasons undetermined. A factor
0 The airplane was damaged directional control not maintained and maximum gross weight
0 The pilot was landing th The pilot's inadequate compensation for winds. Factors includ
0 The pilot decided to condThe pilot's failure to maintain an adequate visual lookout, due
0 While at an altitude of 2 The pilot's improper weather evaluation, resulting in a tailwind
0 During the landing, the The pilot's loss of control during the landing.
0 As the helicopter approaTotal failure of the number 1 bearing due to lack of lubrication
0 The airplane impacted a the proper touchdown point and proper alignment not attained
0 The pilot and two passeng The disengagement of the oil jet fitting from its threaded rece
0 The pilot received a weatThe failure of the pilot to maintain runway alignment during th
0 The accident airplane waFailure to maintain sufficient altitude while on the base to fina
0 The pilot was flying overThe pilot inadvertently stalling the airplane. A factor was the
0 Prior to departing on th the pilot's continued flight into known adverse weather and hi
0 The airplane sustained su the obstructed fuel system filter, the inadequate silicone mate
0 The gyrocopter sustainedthe pilot not obtaining clearance from the trees. Factors were
0 The airplane encountered A loss of engine power due to the failure of the number four cy
0 The solo student pilot r The pilot's selection of an unsuitable landing area. Factors as
0 The student pilot was coThe student pilot's inadequate correction for torque, which res
Page 235
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The single-engine airplanthe pilot's continued flight of the airplane into known adverse
0 The pilot indicated he waThe pilot's failure to maintain proper runway alignment upon e
0 The private pilot was la The pilot's failure to maintain directional control. Factors inclu
0 The instructional fligh A loss of engine power during takeoff climb for undetermined
0 After takeoff, about 2,5 A loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. Factors we
0 The pilot canceled the IFthe pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane while on fi
0 According to the pilot, h The pilot's delayed go-around and his failure to maintain the a
0 The single-engine experithe inadvertent stall while maneuvering. A contributing factor
0 Shortly after departure f The pilot's failure to obtain the proper touchdown point. A fac
0 The helicopter landed haThe inadequate maintenance inspection of the secondary shaf
0 The pilot reported that The failure of the pilot to maintain directional control of the ai
0 The pilot reported that dThe failure of a spur gear from the torque sensor gear assemb
0 During an evaluation fli The failure of the float landing gear system due to non-standa
0 During a daytime IFR cros The pilot's incorrect positioning of the fuel selector which resu
0 At the destination airp On ground loss of control resulting in collision with airport mar
0 The accident airplane wathe pilot's inadequate compensation for the wind condition. A
0 The aircraft was in a po A crack in the propeller blade that developed into a complete
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's failure to properly follow pre-takeoff checklists (res
0 While on an aerial appli A total loss of power due to an engine rocker arm failure and s
0 The helicopter impacted the loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. A factor w
0 The airplane was destroye the inadvertent stall/spin the pilot encountered. A factor was
0 After takeoff, the enrou The pilot's failure to maintain clearance from objects during th
0 The evening before the ac The pilot's intentional performance of aerobatic maneuvers th
0 The pilot reported that uThe failure of the inboard half of the right main landing gear w
0 Following landing, and prFailure by the pilot to keep the burner operating until the ballo
0 While landing on runwayCracking
2 of the weld between the tailwheel stinger housing an
0 The airplane collided wi The pilot's decision to continue with a high, steep, and fast ap
0 The pilot reported the w failure of the pilot to adequately compensate for a crosswind c
0 The accident aircraft wa The pilot's failure to attain proper alignment with the landing r
0 The pilot over flew the a The pilot inadvertently stalling the airplane while turning final
0 The pilot stated the lan Collapse of the tail wheel to the right during landing rollout wh
0 The pilot made a 3-pointfailure of the pilot to recover from a bounced landing resulting
0 The student pilot was onThe student pilot's loss of directional control on takeoff that re
0 The single engine airpla The pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed while in the t
0 The pilot and co-pilot de the pilot's intentional flight into known icing conditions which
0 While on a dark night vi The pilot's failure to maintain proper glidepath. A factor was t
0 The student pilot said t carburetor ice and the pilot's improper decisions when to use
2 The pilot, accompanied bThe pilot's failure to follow aircraft operating procedures by no
0 The pilot told investigat an inadvertent stall at too low altitude to allow recovery. Fact
0 The instructional flight The flight instructor's failure to maintain aircraft control during
0 The pilot reported the a the pilot misjudged the landing flare which resulted in the airp
0 The commercial certificaThe pilot's selection of unsuitable terrain for landing. Factors
0 The first pilot, a commerThe first pilot's (pilot-in-command) inadequate evaluation of th
0 Shortly after departure, Proper touchdown point not attained by the pilot. Factors incl
0 Witnesses stated the gyr
0 About 30 minutes after ra total engine failure for undetermined reason, resulting in a f
0 The pilot was performingThe bending overstress separation of the elevator pitch contro
0 The helicopter's engine eThe failure of the pilot to maintain rotor rpm during an autorot
0 The certificated private The pilot's intentional flight into known adverse weather. Fact
0 The pilot was taking off The pilot's failure to obtain/maintain adequate clearance with
Page 236
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The pilot was on an instrThe pilot's loss of control of the airplane in instrument meteor
0 The engine oil was changThe loss of engine power for undetermined reasons during tak
0 During the landing roll The failure of the pilot to maintain directional control during th
0 During cruise flight the The loss of clamp-up force between the transmission case and
0 The certificated private The pilot's selection of an unsuitable landing area. Factors as
0 The pilot aborted his fir A partial power loss for undetermined reasons.
0 The airplane took off to The pilot's failure to maintain airspeed, which resulted in an in
0 The pilot was giving airpthe pilot's improper inflight planning/decision to land long, wit
0 The pilot was hovering The disconnection of the tail rotor drive shaft and subsequent
0 The pilot reported that hDisconnection of the elevator push rod due to the owner/build
0 The accident airplane wathe pilot failed to maintain altitude after inadvertently flying to
0 The pilot said that after the misjudged glidepath by the pilot. Factors were the failure
0 At 0103, N1072D, collideThe pilot's physically impaired condition due to his high level o
0 The certificated private The pilot's selection of an unsuitable landing area. A factor as
0 During a personal flight Terrain clearance was not maintained. High mountains, moun
0 According to the pilot w the pilot misjudged the flare resulting in a hard landing short o
0 Three helicopters departe the pilot's failure to maintain control of the helicopter resulting
0 The single engine airpla the total loss of engine power while in cruise flight due to the
0 The pilot/owner/builder oWas the pilot' use of an unsecured ballast weight in the cockp
0 The pilot attempted to t The pilot's inadequate preflight inspection, which resulted in t
0 The certificated private The pilot's failure to maintain altitude/clearance. Factors asso
0 During the takeoff climb,the flying pilot's failure to maintain directional control followin
0 The pilot was flying a r the pilot's failure to anticipate turbulence from the formation l
0 The pilot was making a sThe loss of power for undetermined reasons, which resulted in
0
0 During initial descent a The complete loss of the tail rotor blades due to a fatigue failu
0 The student pilot report the student pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the
0 The solo airline transpo The pilot's excessive application of heel brakes. A factor asso
0 The pilot stated he lost The pilot's failure to compensate for a crosswind and to maint
0 The airplane was climbinEngine seizure due to the rupture of an oil cooler line.
The pilot of another air The maintenance personnel's failure to re-torque the engine d
0 The pilot reported that han inadequate preflight inspection by the pilot which did not d
0 The pilot stated that wh The pilot's improper compensation for wind conditions during
0 While maneuvering about Company maintenance personnel's failure to secure an attach
0 During a solo instructionFuel exhaustion during cruise flight due to the student pilot be
0 The pilot reported that The failure of the pilot to obtain the proper airspeed during lan
0 During a positioning fli A loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 During an approach to thThe student pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditio
The accident occurred asA loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
The pilot had completedThe pilot's improper inflight decision not to refuel which result
0 After completing aerial aThe pilot's failure to adequately compensate for wind conditio
0 The pilot reported that s A high density altitude and inadequate preflight planning/prep
0 Prior to departure the pi The pilot's improper weather evaluation, which resulted in a lo
0 The pilot said he had be A momentary interruption in engine power for undetermined r
0 On a dark night, en routeThe pilot's failure to maintain terrain clearance while cruising
0 After takeoff to the sou The stall/mush encountered by the pilot. A factor was the cro
0 While on landing roll, a Failure by the pilot to maintain control of the aircraft during la
0 The student pilot said t the broken landing gear axle.
0 Upon arrival at the turf The pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the glider a
0 While in cruise flight at The pilot's in-flight decision to continue flight into IMC conditio
Page 237
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The owner/pilot of a vin the pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane.
0 The airplane was sprayinThe fatigue failure and in-flight separation of the left wing due
0 The pilot reported, 'Afte aircraft control not being maintained by the pilot. Factors to t
0 The pilot stated that, w The loss of engine power due to a stuck exhaust valve that re
0 The student pilot reporteThe student pilot's inaccurate fuel consumption calculation tha
0 The pilot reported she laThe pilot's inadequate compensation for the gusty wind condit
0 The pilot reported that dThe pilot's failure to refuel the airplane, which resulted in a los
The pilot experienced deThe pilot's improper recovery from a bounced landing. A facto
0 The airplane sustained sthe pilot not maintaining directional control. Factors were the
0 According to data retrie The pilot's decision to attempt flight in an area of high rising m
0 The pilot reported losin the loss of tail rotor effectiveness and the autorotation perform
0 During the pilot's prefl The pilot's inadequate preflight, and the water that remained
0 Day visual meteorological the loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 The medical service heli The pilot's failure to maintain clearance that resulted in the in
0 According to the studentThe failure of the flight instructor to maintain control of the he
0 While en route, followingThe pilot's inadequate preflight resulting in the loss of the oil c
0 The airplane impacted ththe pilot failed to maintain aircraft control due to spatial disori
0 The runway is situated oFailure of the flight review pilot to compensate for the crosswi
0 Recorded radar data show The inflight loss of control for undetermined reasons resulting
0 Prior to landing the pilo The pilot's inadequate compensation for the existing crosswin
0 The aircraft veered off The pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the aircraft
0 There were no witnessesThe pilot's encounter with a wind shear at low altitude, which
0 The private pilot was cl The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane during a g
0 During the takeoff roll, The pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the airplan
0 During the demonstration The pilot's premature raising of the flaps.
0 During approach for landThe pilot's failure to maintain control of the aircraft after initia
0 The private certificated The pilot's selection of unsuitable terrain for landing. A factor
0 The aircraft, which depa The pilot's failure to maintain clearance from the terrain. Facto
0
0 The airplane was destroyThe pilot's loss of directional control during takeoff for undete
0 On the landing roll the Loss of directional control during landing for undetermined rea
0 The pilot reported that t The company mechanic's failure to replace the bolt's cotter ke
0 The pilot said he performthe pilot not maintaining directional control on the ground and
0 The pilot arrived at the The airplane collision with a deer during a night landing.
0 The commercial certificatThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the airplan
0 The pilot reported that An inadequately planned approach. Misjudging distance/altitu
0 The certificated flight i The second pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditio
0 Approximately 50 minutes A loss of engine power caused by detonation of the #2 piston.
0 Witnesses said the experi The pilot's abruptly pulling the nose up at an excessive airspe
0 While on a cross-countryA descent below the surrounding terrain, by the pilot, in IMC c
0 The airplane was substant the pilot's inadequate fuel management. Factors to the accide
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's inadequate in-flight planning necessitating an inten
0 The pilot/builder of the The pilot/builder's failure to correct the center of gravity comp
0 The helicopter landed haThe student's misjudged altitude and failure to maintain rotor
0 The helicopter had been The pilot's intentional buzzing (low level flying), and his failure
0 Reportedly, the pilot comThe pilot's inadequate pre-flight inspection of the fuel supply t
0 The pilot, the holder of The pilot's continued VFR flight into instrument meteorologica
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's failure to maintain runway alignment and direction
0 The airplane contacted athe pilot's failure to maintain driectional control of the airplane
0 The airplane was destroye the pilot not maintaining aircraft control and the stall/spin he e
Page 238
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The pilot stated that th The pilot's improper flare and inadequate recovery from a bou
The pilot's failure to follow the landing checklist that resulted
0 The pilot was landing to The pilot's failure to maintain control of the aircraft during the
0 During a practice power T r he pilot misjudged the run on landing during a full autorotati
0 The helicopter impacted the ground resonance encountered by the pilot.
0 The pilot reported that wLoss of engine power due to failure of the number three cylind
0 The flight instructor st the dual student's improper visual lookout and the flight instru
0 .
0 The certificated commerci The pilot's failure to attain a proper touchdown point.
0 While en route on the weThe pilot's improper decision to continue to a point where he c
0 While in cruise flight, t A crack in the crankcase which resulted in a partial power loss
0 Upon touchdown, the airpl The pilot's loss of control due to his improper application of po
0 The pilot stated he appr the pilot's misjudgment of his closure rate, while turning to lan
0 The student pilot stated the student pilot's misjudgment of the aircraft's altitude and s
0 The pilot stated that he the pilot's failure to maintain an adequate lookout resulting in
0 The pilot hovered the helThe pilot's improper in-flight planning and decision to hover ou
0 During the approach, a wThe pilot's inadvertent stall of the aircraft.
0 The pilot was flying low The pilot's failure to maintain control of the helicopter while m
0 The pilot aborted the fi The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the ab
0 The 683-hour pilot reporThe partial loss of engine power as result of the failure of an e
0 The airplane touched dow the pilot's poor inflight planning which resulted in exceeded th
0 Approximately 100 feet ab The rotation of the right fuel tank elbow fitting within the tank
0 A powered airplane was to The pilot's failure to maintain control of the glider. A factor re
0 The pilot stated that improper rigging of the rudder/elevators and differential mech
0 The wind was light and vFailure of the pilot to maintain directional control.
0 The purpose of the fligh The failure of the pilot to maintain a proper glidepath, which r
0 During the landing roll The pilot's inadequate compensation for a crosswind and his f
0 A witness, located approThe pilot's failure to maintain clearance with the antenna towe
0 While on final approach The pilot's misjudgment of traffic pattern altitude that resulted
0 The solo private pilot r A loss of engine power due to an undetermined reason. A fac
0 The flight instructor rep The combined failure of the operator management and the ch
0 The instrument rated pil The pilot's continued VFR flight into instrument meteorologica
0 N69BM was discovered in the pilot's loss of control in flight for undetermined reasons.
0 It was the airplane's 15t the pilot's failure to refuel the airplane as required by the airp
0
0 During a touchdown autor The improper touchdown performed by the flight instructor.
0 The helicopter rolled ovethe pilot misjudged the landing flare which resulted in a hard l
0 The pilot stated his des The pilot's improper fuel management resulting in fuel starvat
0 While performing a low hA separation of the lower engine cowling and subsequent part
0 The solo commercial piloThe pilot's inadvertent ground loop/swerve during landing.
0 The first pilot, a certi A fatigue failure of the crankcase through bolt, the separation
0 The twin engine helicopte the loss of power in all engines due to the pilot's inadequate in
0 The airplane collided wi Inadequate crew coordination led to the captain's decision to d
0 The pilot stated he was The pilot's failure to maintain directional control on landing ro
0 The pilot stated he was An in-flight fire in the vicinity of the firewall from an undeterm
0 The flight instructor was the instructor pilot's failure to maintain control of the helicopte
0 The helicopter took off f carburetor ice. Factors relating to this accident were the icing
0 The pilot stated the eng The loss of engine power for undetermined reasons, and the p
0 The pilot did not perfor the loss of control on takeoff as a result of the pilot's failure to
0 The pilot was in a glide The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control. A factor was the
Page 239
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 240
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The pilot completed a sec The corrosion and fatigue cracking of the right wing attachme
0 The pilot was making an thea failure of the pilot in command to maintain clearance with
0 During a first solo fligh the failure of the student pilot to maintain directional control o
0 The pilot performed one The pilot's failure to maintain control of the helicopter.
0 The pilot complained of The in-flight collision with trees then terrain while descending
0 En route from Arizona toPhysical incapacitation of the pilot from improper handling of a
0 The airplane was substanthe pilot not attaining an airspeed necessary for the go-around
0 The aiplane impacted a dthe deer incursion on the landing runway.
0 The Boeing 767 (B-767) e The failure of the B-767 flight crew to ensure their aircraft's je
0 The pilot stated that he The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control. Factors were gu
0 The original engine did The failure of the powerplant to produce adequate power for u
0 According to the pilot, An in-flight separation of a tail rotor blade tip weight resulting
0 A hard landing ensued whe The pilot's failure to attain the proper rotation airspeed during
0 The amateur built airpla The loss of control for an undetermined reason.
0 The airplane was taxiingthe improper compensation for the wind conditions. A factor i
0 The Cessna 152 departed the failure of both pilots to maintain visual lookout.
0 The pilot reported that wThe pilot's inadequate visual lookout, and his failure to mainta
0 Shortly after takeoff fro In flight collision with birds.
0 Approaching his destinatThe deterioration and subsequent leakage of a hydraulic line w
0 After the third aerial ap The failure of the number 9 cylinder connecting rod, due to a
0 According to the CFI, h The failure of the CFI to delay his landing until the approachin
0 The Cessna 152 departed the failure of both pilots to maintain visual lookout.
0 The pilot said that sever The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during landing ro
0 The pilot said he was maThe pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions durin
0 The airplane was landingThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control during landin
0 The airplane touched dow The pilot's improper use of unsuitable terrain for landing. A fa
0 The delivery pilot flew The pilot's failure to maintain the proper glide path on final ap
0 The balloon was tetheredan in-flight collision with a tree. A factor in this accident was h
0 Witnesses reported seeinThe pilot's failure to abort the downwind takeoff and his failure
0 The pilot departed on hi The pilot's failure to obtain/maintain aircraft control after take
0
0 The pilot filed a flight the pilot's disregard of the weather forecast, and his VFR fligh
0 The aircraft was substantthe failure of the pilot to attain aircraft control. Factors to the
0 The pilot began preparatflight into known adverse weather conditions and the altitude/
0 The pilot was practicing The pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the gyropla
0 The two-aircraft format A midair collision due to the failure of the wingman to maintai
0 The pilot stated that af The unsuitable terrain encountered by the pilot-in-command d
0 The student had performe The inadequate supervision of the student pilot by the CFI for
0 The fuel tanks were full The operation of the airplane by the pilot-in-command in an ov
0 During cruise flight, th The failure of the pilot to change the fuel selector position afte
0 The two-aircraft format A midair collision due to the failure of the wingman to maintai
0 The airplane collided wi The flight instructor's delayed remedial action, and his failure
0 The pilot departed on a cthe pilot's improper fuel management which resulted in fuel st
0 During takeoff, at rotat The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the tak
0 During initial climb fol The complete loss of power due to the separation of the magn
0 Because of winds blowing The pilot's failure to maintain clearance from the rising terrain
0 The aircraft collided wi A partial loss of power due to water contamination in the fuel
0 The pilot was attemptingThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the lan
0 According to the pilot, The failure of the left magneto, which resulted in a partial loss
0 The pilot reported to hi The pilot's selection of unsuitable terrain for the precautionary
Page 241
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 After being towed severaThe pilot's improper in-flight decision by not immediately seek
0 The pilot entered a righ The pilot's failure to attain a proper touchdown point.
0 The pilot reported, 'I d the pilot exceeded the proper touchdown point during the land
0 While cruising at 2,000 fimproper installation of a quick drain plug by the airplane own
0 Two days before the accid The failure of the dual student to maintain airspeed following
0 The airplane departed fr The failure of the pilot to maintain airspeed during the takeoff
0 During the aerial applicaThe failure of the supercharger seal resulting in the loss of eng
0 While maneuvering during The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane, which re
0 During an instructional f In-flight planning and decision by the flight instructor by allow
0 During climbout, the airpThe failure of the pilot-in-command to ensure adequate airspe
0 The airplane was seen flyan in-flight collision with trees while maneuvering, which was
0 The airplane veered off tThe student pilot's failure to maintain directional control durin
0 During a series of high- the pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed while attemp
0 While on base leg turning The failure of the pilot/flight instructor to maintain sufficient a
0 The airplane entered theThe pilot's failure to perform a go around and his inadequate r
0 The pilot said that the The failure of the turbocharger scavenging pump resulting in t
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's failure to adequately compensate for wind conditio
0 While landing, during th The CFI's delayed remedial action.
The pilot was executing The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the ab
0 The airplane was seen hig the flight instructor failed to maintain control of the airplane a
0 Loss of engine power caused by a fuel soaked float pontoon ca
0 The pilot reported heari The pilot's physical impairment due to the cumulative effects
0 The commercial pilot hadthe loss of engine power in cruise flight as a result of the failu
0 The pilot stated that he The failure of the pilot to maintain directional control during th
0 The airplane departed wit The pilot's failure to maintain clearance with trees while mane
0 The private pilot stated the loss of engine power for an undetermined reason. A contr
0 The pilot flew the agricu The pilot's failure to maintain clearance with the power lines w
0 The airplane veered off othe directional control not maintained by the pilot. The thund
0 The pilot entered the tr The pilot's failure to retract the speed brakes which resulted in
0 The pilot was taking off Overheating of the left brake, causing the wheel to lock. Fact
0 The student pilot was con the failure of the student pilot to reduce the friction on the cyc
0 The airplane veered off tThe failure of the pilot-in-command to maintain directional con
0 The airplane was executin The pilot's improper setting of the cockpit fuel selector, which
0 The pilot reported the w the inadequate compensation for the wind conditions and the
0 The pilot said that he fl The pilot's inadequate compensation for the crosswind conditi
0 While in cruise flight, t Fuel starvation due to the pilot's failure to position the fuel sel
0 After touchdown, the tailThe pilot's loss of control of the airplane during the landing rol
0 During a fire-fighting f the pilot's failure to maintain control of the helicopter for unde
0 After making a radio callDiminished control during the landing phase of operation due
0
0 The student pilot initiat The student pilot's failure to maintain directional control durin
0 According to the pilot, Fuel exhaustion as a result of an inaccurate fuel quantity indic
0 While on downwind abeam Fuel starvation due to the unavailability of fuel to the engine f
0 The aircraft lost engine the engine failure for undetermined reasons. Factors were the
0 During a routine aerial aThe pilots failure to maintain clearance from power transmissi
0 The solo student pilot w The student's improper execution of a quick-stop maneuver in
0 Two witnesses saw the aiThe pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control. A factor was a t
0 The purpose of the fligh the flight instructor's failure to maintain aircraft control while
0 The airplane landed in a the water contamination of the fuel system and the inadequat
0 The student pilot planned The student pilot's failure to maintain altitude clearance durin
Page 242
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The pilot was circling th The pilot's failure to establish/maintain a safe rate of descent
0 The pilot said that imme The loss of engine power for an undetermined reason.
0 All three landing gear re The certified flight instructor's (pilot-in-command) inadequate
0 The pilot was returning The excessive wear of the reduction gearbox's 1st stage sung
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the lan
0 The pilot said that as t The fire in the engine compartment for unknown reason.
0 The pilot executed a 'thrThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the airplan
0 The airplane was in crui The separation of the #3 connecting rod, piston, and cylinder.
0 The aircraft was conductiAircraft control not being maintained by the pilot. Factors to t
0 Prior to performing touchThe pilot exceeding the performance capability of the airplane
0 The helicopter was hoverThe pilot's exceedance of the helicopter's hovering capabilitie
0 The pilot reported that aAircraft control was not maintained. Inadequate remedial acti
0 The pilot inadvertently The pilot inadvertently lowering the landing gear of the amphi
0 The pilot set up for no w The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind. The crosswind
0 The pilot collided with The fuel flow became restricted by remnants of fuel tank seala
0 The pilot flew the twin e the pilot's improper fuel management which resulted in fuel st
0 After departure, the airpThe pilot's improper fuel tank selection, which resulted in fuel
0 The pilot stated that he The pilot's improper compensation for the existing crosswind c
0 During a simulated emerg the loss of engine power during a go-around resulting from the
0 The pilot descended fromThe loss of power for undetermined reasons and the pilot's un
0 The pilot said that durin restricted directional control. Factors relating to this accident
0 During initial climb aft the failure of the engine and the unsuitable terrain for landing
0 The flight instructor an The certified flight instructor's failure to maintain airspeed dur
0 While en route to his or The pilot's inability to maintain the correct approach airspeed
0 The airplane departed wiFuel starvation of the engine, caused by the failure of the fuel
During takeoff, approximThe owner/builder's inadequate design, resulting in total failur
0 After a normal pre-fligh A loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 The student pilot was pr the failure of the pilot to maintain directional control in that he
0 During cruise flight, 10 The improper in-flight decision of the pilot not to land at the n
0 The pilot was planning t A total loss of engine power due to carburetor icing conditions
0 The solo private pilot re The pilot's improper positioning of the fuel tank selector, and f
0 The helicopter collided the pilot's encounter with a wind shear while maneuvering at
0 The pilot reported that t The pilot's failure to maintain clearance with the trees. Factor
0 The pilot was taxiing his the pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control when the airplane
0 The pilot attempted to taaltitude/clearance from the trees not being obtained/maintain
0 The pilot was practicing The pilot's failure to maintain airspeed during final approach t
0 Approximately 10 minutes A total loss of engine power due to foreign object damage to t
0 The certificated private The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions. Fac
0 The certificated private The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the tak
0 The private pilot receiv Failure of the instructor pilot-in-command and the pilot receivi
0 While the pilot was taxi The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane while tax
0 The pilot was making a sWas the failure of the pilot to attain his proper touchdown poin
0 The purpose of the flightthe pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane. A factor
0 The private pilot receiv Failure of the instructor pilot-in-command and the pilot receivi
0 At approximately 100 feeThe pilot's failure to maintain control of the aircraft. A factor w
0 The pilot reported that dThe pilot inadvertently applied full flaps during the aborted lan
0 N66081 was destroyed when the improper in-flight decision of the pilot to fly past the Vand
0 While executing a non-prThe pilot's failure to maintain airspeed, which resulted in an in
0 The airplane's main landthe unlocked main landing gear and the manual gear extensio
0 Near the destination airpThe pilot's inaccurate fuel consumption calculations, his misju
Page 243
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 During takeoff roll the The fracture and failure of the main landing gear strut to shoc
0 The commercial pilot finiThe pilot's failure to maintain clearance with the power lines.
0 The police helicopter wasthe pilot's failure to maintain translational lift while maneuver
0 The certificated airline The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions. A fa
0 The pilot was taking off The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the tak
0 The owner/pilot and pilo The pilot's entering an inadvertent stall condition, and the lack
0 The pilot lost direction The pilot's improper bounced landing recovery technique and
0 The helicopter touched dSettling with power precipitated by a wind direction change du
0 During landing roll, at t The pilot's failure to compensate for wind conditions and contr
0 During the landing roll, The failure of the pilot under instruction to maintain directiona
0 During an aerobatic mane The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane for undet
0 On initial takeoff roll The failure of the pilot to maintain directional control during ta
0 During a go-around fromThe a pilot's loss of directional control due to his inadequate rem
0 The accident happened on The pilot's improper operation of the fuel selector.
0 A witness saw the airpla Failure of the pilot to maintain an adequate airspeed margin w
0 Prior to departure, the p The pilot's failure to comply with published emergency proced
0 The pilot/owner assembled The pilot's improper installation, i.e., reversed connection, of t
0 After landing on a grass The pilot's failure to maintain directional control after landing
0 Prior to the day of the a The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control. Factors were th
0 The commercial pilot wasthe tow plane pilot's inadequate airplane performance calcula
0 The commercial glider pithe tow plane pilot's inadequate airplane performance calcula
0 The pilot was giving heli the loss of engine power as a result of fuel exhaustion due to
0 The pilot reported made the pilot performed inadequate remedial action to recover wh
0 The pilot reported that aThe pilot's failure to determine the aircraft's airworthiness bef
0 The airplane was on the The instructor's delayed remedial action. Factors included the
0 The student pilot was ta the pilot's failure to maintain clearance with the T-hangar whil
0 The pilot said that duri A loss of engine power due to fuel starvation as a result of an
0 While on initial climb a The pilot's improper in-flight decison to maneuver back to the
0 The airplane touched dow The pilot's failure to maintain directional control. A factor in th
0 While participating in a The pilot's inadequate compensation for crosswind conditions.
0 Approximately a week befo The flight instructor's delayed corrective action.
0 The airplane collided witThe pilot's inadequate preflight planning that resulted in fuel e
0 The instructional flight in-flight loss of control and inadvertent stall.
0 The flight instructor re Loss of engine power for reasons undetermined. A factor was
0 The helicopter was equipthe pilot's failure to maintain clearance with the external load
The student pilot, on hi The pilot's improper flare and his inadequate recovery from a
0 The pilot took off witho The pilot's decision to takeoff in unfavorable weather conditio
0 Witnesses reported obser The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control. Inadequate altit
0 The pilot stated he lan The pilots failure to ensure the helicopter was on level terrai
0 While was en route from The pilot inadvertently stalling the airplane. A factor was his f
0 The pilot was landing on The fatigue failure of the left main landing gear leg at the mai
0 The flight instructor an The loss of engine power during the initial takeoff climb, at too
0 This was a cross-countryThe pilot's inadequate short field landing procedure and his de
0 During cruise, the engin The inadequate maintenance inspection by other maintenance
0 During the takeoff/initi The pilot's inadvertent stall of the aircraft.
0 According to the pilot, The loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. A factor w
0 The pilot, who did not hoThe pilot's continued flight into known adverse weather. A fac
0 See narrative for ANC00 The inadequate visual lookout by the pilot of the other airplan
0 The pilot reported that wThe pilot's failure to maintain airspeed and his failure to maint
0 The pilot took off with a The pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed through an a
Page 244
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The pilot adjusted the h A failure of the propeller reduction gear assembly for undeterm
0 The airplane collided wi The pilot's attempt to takeoff from an unsuitable area and his
0 According to the CFI whoLoss of directional control due to separation of the tail-wheel s
0 The private pilot reporte The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions durin
0 The pilot departed the 1 The pilot's disregard of the existing wind conditions, and an in
0 The Learjet departed fr The failure of the pilot's of both airplanes to maintain a visual
0 The pilot was performingThe pilot's inadequate preflight of the helicopter, and his subs
0 The Learjet departed fr The failure of the pilot's of both airplanes to maintain a visual
0 The glider was observed Thet pilot's failure to maintain aircraft speed and control while
0 The helicopter pilot too the partial failure of the tail rotor pitch change control rod tha
0 The flight instructor an the flight instructor's improper pre-flight plan and decision to
0 The pilot was completingThe pilot's misjudgment of distance/speed resulting in an over
0 The pilot realized short A sudden and unexpected encounter with a downdraft while o
0 The pilot was making histhe student pilot failed to properly flare the airplane while land
0 The airplane impacted ter the pilot not maintaining aircraft control and the stall/spin she
0 According to an FAA inspe The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during landin
0 The pilot stated to the S the pilot's excessive use of wheel brakes during the landing ro
0 During landing roll, app The flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the landing re
0 The accident occurred duan improper modification to the engine which allowed a bearin
0 The pilot originally dep A landing gear collapse resulting from the pilot's unsuccessful
0 According to the pilot, Loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. A factor was
0 The private certificated The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions. Fac
0 The private pilot was de The failure of the pilot to maintain directional control of the ai
0 The pilot-in-command, a Thec pilot-in-command's failure to maintain directional control
0 The pilot stated that he The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions, whic
0 The pilot was practicing Failure by the pilot to maintain control of the aircraft during in
0 The airplane took off an The pilot's improper inflight decision to prematurely attempt a
0 The airplane was destroyfailure of the pilot to maintain clearance with the terrain after
0 The pilot said that durin A bear running onto the landing area during the landing flare.
0 The airstrip (runway 27) the pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane which res
0 The CFI and student were the CFI delayed initiating a go-around during the landing. Fact
0 According to the pilot, w The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions. Fact
0 The pilot reported that Fracture of the engine's #1 connecting rod, resulting in a tota
0 During takeoff, the engi the partial loss of engine power on takeoff, which resulted from
0 The 317-hour private pil The fuel exhaustion due to the pilot's failure to refuel the airpl
0 The private pilot was no the pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control while maneuverin
0 The pilot reported that wFuel exhaustion and inaccurate fuel management. A false ind
0 The flight instructor st the flight instructor's inadequate supervision that resulted in t
0 The ground crew's diverted attention toward the landing airsh
0 During a local instrumentThe flight instructor's failure to refuel the airplane, which resu
0 The private pilot and cerImproper preflight preflight planning/preparation by the pilot-i
0 The flight instructor st the flight instructor's failure to follow procedures/directives an
0 The single engine aircra The loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 The restricted category The inadequate lubrication of the tail rotor drive shaft coupling
0 The airplane collided wi the total loss of engine power resulting from the mechanic's fa
0 The pilot was attemptingThe pilot's misjudged flare and improper recovery from a boun
0 The flight instructor sim The partial loss of engine power, which resulted from the worn
0 The agricultural airplaneThe pilot's inadequate preflight planning, which resulted in the
0 The pilot reported that hthe failure of the pilot to maintain clearance from the building
0 The pilot made a forced lthe pilot intentionally operated the airplane with known dama
Page 245
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The night before the daythe failure of the pilot to obtain fuel and the inadequate preflig
0 About 30 minutes after tA failure in the engine's number 1 piston, resulting in a total lo
0 While climbing after tak The dual student's failure to purge the fuel lines of air after a f
0 The student pilot stated the student pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control upon enc
0 Several witnesses statedthe student pilot's loss of helicopter control after suffering a st
0 The solo student plannedThe pilot prematurely flaring the airplane for landing, resulting
0 The pilot was returning the failure of the engine reduction gear assembly. Factors we
0 The airplane was destroythe wing spar fatigue and wing separation while maneuvering
0 The pilot was unable to The pilot's attempted takeoff with known deficiencies in equip
0 The flight instructor wa The pilot-in-command's failure to initiate a timely go-around.
0 The airplane landed, theThe student pilot's failure to maintain directional control durin
0 The pilot stated that he the owner/builder's improper installation that resulted in the f
0 The pilot stated he land The pilot's failure to refuel prior to departure resulting in loss o
0 The air traffic control failure of the pilot to maintain an adequate airspeed margin re
0 The approach to landing the pilot's failure to recover from a bounced landing.
0 On short final, the airp the pilot's loss of control on landing after encountering a dust
0 The student pilot depart the student pilot's inadequate compensation for winds that re
0 During an aerial photogrThe pilot's failure to maintain adequate rotor RPM and failure
0 During a high speed, lowThe in-flight separation of the propeller spinner. A factor was
0 The pilot, who is also an The pilot's inadequate preflight planning and his delay in abor
0 The airplane was landingthe obstructed brake pedals and the unavailable brakes to the
0 The student pilot was pr the misjudged flare and the inadequate recovery from the bou
0 While on final approach the downdraft experienced during final approach and altitude/
0 The experimental amateur the inadvertent stall by the pilot. The low attitude at the time
0 In a written statement, t Improper landing flare resulting in a hard landing. Factors inc
0 The pilot reported that Improper maintenance (excessive/improper sealant applicatio
0 The pilot reported that The locknut was not secured and backed off the bolt. An impr
0 While landing the tail-whA seized left brake as reported by the pilot.
0 The airplane was departin The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane after an a
0 The pilot said he had beeimproper maintenance inspection of the tail rotor by maintena
0 After takeoff the pilot The pilot's inadequate visual lookout while maneuvering to av
0 While climbing through 3The improper installation of the engine front crankshaft seal b
0 The pilot was performingthe pilot's inadequate decision to turn back (low altitude) towa
0 The airplane wreckage wa In flight collision with the terrain for undetermined reason.
0 The certificated private The pilot's inadequate compensation for a crosswind. A factor
0 The pilot reported in a The pilot's failure to maintain sufficient altitude to avoid conta
0 The pilot reported that s The pilot's improper use of the mixture control.
0 The pilot stated that he The pilot's improper flare, which resulted in a loss of control.
0 The pilot was completingThe pilot's failure to maintain airspeed, resulting in an inadver
0 Smoke was observed from The failure of the pilot to maintain airspeed while reversing co
0 The pilot stated that th The pilot's failure to compensate with rudder control for engin
0 The pilot had flown abouThe loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 The student pilot and fl The pilot's improper recovery from a bounced landing, and his
0 The pilot was conductingThe loss of engine power due to the blocked engine intake, wh
0 At the completion of a loThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the aircraft
0 A private pilot departed Suicide.
0 The pilot, who had to appThe pilot's failure to correctly judge his rate of descent and his
0 The student pilot stated the flight instructor's failure to maintain an airspeed above the
0 The pilot was cruising t the pilot encountered a mountain wave at an altitude too low
0 The pilot stated that du The pilot's improper flare, which resulted in a hard landing.
Page 246
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The pilot was attemptingthe failure of the pilot to select the correct runway for takeoff.
0 The pilot reported that the control stick movement being restricted by the pilot's seat
0 The pilot made a forced The piston and rings in cylinder No. 1 failed resulting in a tota
0 The pilot was spaying a rThe pilot's failure to maintain clearance with the power line. A
0 The student pilot was attthe failure of the student pilot to maintain control of the aircra
0 The pilot reported that oThe pilot's failure to attain the proper touchdown point for lan
0 As the airplane touched The overload failure of the left main gear strut housing.
0 During the landing roll, an improper flare by the pilot which induced an overload failur
0 According to the pilot, The pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the airplan
0 Touch-and-go landings we failure of the instructor to adequately supervise the student, r
0 The airplane was conductiThe student pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the
0 The private pilot receiv Failure of the pilot receiving instruction to maintain directiona
0 The airplane was destroyeThe pilots failure to maintain control of the aircraft and his con
0 The certificated airline The pilot's selection of an unsuitable landing area. Factors as
0 The pilot performed a deThe pilot's failure to maintain altitude/clearance and delayed p
0 The pilot said that duri the loss of engine power during takeoff/initial climb due to und
0 During takeoff rotation, The failure of the inter-cooler duct connecting the inter-cooler
0 The pilot observed no wifailure of the pilot to maintain directional control during the la
0 Following maintenance on in-flight collision with a jacket, which blew out of the helicopte
0 The pilot was performingThe fatigue failure of the rod end bearing and the separation o
0 The pilot said that he w the undetermined uncontrolled descent.
0 The non-instrument rated The non-instrument rated pilot's attempted VFR flight in instru
0 The commercial pilot wasFailure to maintain clearance from mountainous/hilly terrain.
0 The airplane was departiThe pilot's improper decision to abort the takeoff. A factor in
0 The private pilot purchasthe delayed corrective action by the flight instructor. Factors
0 The student pilot (SP) w The student pilot's failure to recover from a bounced landing a
0
0 The pilot completed fourfailure of the pilot-in-command to adequately compensate for
0 After landing, the airpl failure of the pilot to compensate for a sudden wind shift resu
0 Before entering the airp pilot's inadequate compensation for the crosswind. A factor w
0 Shortly after take-off, the loss of engine power during take-off for undetermined rea
0 During the landing approThe pilot's failure to attain the proper touchdown point, and hi
0 Four hours and 10 minute the pilot's inaccurate fuel consumption calculations and exhau
0 The airplane entered thethe pilot's misjudged flare, which resulted in a hard landing. A
0 During a swath run, whilethe failure of the power output reduction gear to the propeller
0 According to the operator The failure of the pilot to maintain clearance with the deer sta
0 During the takeoff/initia The inadvertent stall. A factor was the improperly positioned
0 The pilot receiving inst Aircraft control was not possible by the flight instructor due to
0 The pilot made a full po An inadvertent stall/mush. Factors were high density altitude,
0 The pilot flew the airpla the pilot's poor in-flight decision to fly up a valley with rapidly
0 The pilot attempted an aThe pilot attempting an aerobatic maneuver at a low altitude
0 The personal flight depa loss of control in flight for undetermined reason(s).
0 The certificated private The pilot's failure to refuel the airplane prior to fuel exhaustion
0 The pilot attempted to taThe pilot-in-command's improper decision to takeoff uphill, on
0 While in cruise flight a A severed oil pressure line, which resulted in an off airport lan
0 A witness, a licensed avithe pilot's failure to maintain control during initial climb that r
0 The private pilot was fl the total loss of engine power due to the pilot's inaccurate fue
0 During landing rollout t directional control not being maintained by the pilot during lan
0 The airplane sustained su the restricted fuel line, and the pilot not attaining proper runw
0
Page 247
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The flight instructor rep An improper installation of a rudder control cable Nicopress sl
0 The flight was a maintenA loss of engine power due to failure of the No. 4 cylinder con
0 The pilot stated that he the flight crew's failure to activate the normal brake system, a
0 The airplane lost power iThe pilot's failure to ensure that an adequate fuel supply was
0 The pilot said that when The pilot in command's failure to maintain aircraft directional
0 The left wings on the air the pilot's failure to maintain clearance with the power lines.
0 During an aerial applica the failure of the number-two connecting rod bearing and the
0 After the pilot took off Improper airstrip operations by ground personnel, and the pilo
0 While lifting approximat The termination of power to the main rotor system as a result
0 The non-instrument rated The pilot's failure to follow the published go-around procedure
0 While taking off on a so The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane while tak
0 The pilot was traveling f The pilot-in-command's improper in-flight decision to maneuve
0 While maneuvering during A partial loss of engine power due to the failure of an exhaust
0 Witnesses observed the a the pilot's inadvertent stall during initial takeoff climb.
0 The unlicensed 'pilot' o The pilot's failure to maintain clearance from a tree while mak
0 Prior to departure, the the pilot's improper decision to depart with obstacles ahead w
0 The pilot flew to a near The unsuitable terrain encountered by the pilot while descend
0 The airplane landed gearFailure of the pilot to extend the landing gear, and his failure t
0 During a touch-and-go taA cracked plastic fuel selector handle that precluded proper e
0 Prior to takeoff, an ini the failure of both magnetos of the dual-magneto single-drive
0 During a cross-country f the loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. Contribut
0 A partial loss of engine A loss of engine power due to the separation of a connecting r
0 The pilot reported that hThe loss of engine power for an undetermined reason. A facto
0 As the airplane, which wthe loss of engine power for an undetermined reason during m
0 During climb following t The lack of suitable terrain for a forced landing. A factor was
0 The aircraft departed ru the incapacitation of the pilot. Factors to the accident were th
0 During landing rollout t directional control not being maintained by the pilot during lan
0 The pilot reported, 'I la the pilot selected to land in a field that was unsuitable for land
0 Three of the nine occupathe unfavorable wind condition for landing and control of the b
0 The pilot said he took of fuel exhaustion and the pilot abruptly applying normal brakes
0 During landing rollout t the failure of the pilot to maintain directional control of the air
0 According to FAA Memphi The failure of the pilot to maintain control while maneuvering
0 According to the pilot's The pilot's failure to refuel the airplane and his improper fuel c
0 The flight instructor and The improper use of the cyclic control by the pilot under instru
0 The pilot reported the ai The collision with a bird while in cruise flight.
0 The pilot said he knew prThe pilot's improper use of the fuel tank selector, resulting in
0 The pilot reported he to A loss of engine power due to the pilot's failure to use carbure
0 The pilots of a Beech (B The pilot of the other airplane's (Cessna) inadequate visual loo
0 The pilot reported that s The right main landing gear failed for undetermined reasons.
0 The pilots of a Beech (B The Cessna pilot's inadequate visual lookout and misjudged di
0 The pilot was on approacThe pilot's inadequate compensation for gusty winds condition
0 No discrepancies were no The pilot's in-flight decision to continue the takeoff and his sub
0 The pilot stated that he The inadvertent stall while maneuvering to avoid obstructions
0 The airplane was fueled The loss of control for an undetermined reason.
0 Shortly after takeoff, a Seizure of the starter clutch assembly needle bearing, which c
0 The aircraft was substanthe failure of the pilot to maintain clearance with the terrain.
0 The airplane was destroythe failure of the pilot to maintain clearance from the power li
0 The pilot reported that the pilot's improper bounced landing recovery. A factor was t
0 As the airplane was landiThe pilot's failure to maintain a proper decent rate. A factor w
0 During the cross-countryThe pilot's failure to attain the proper touchdown point and his
Page 248
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 After a normal takeoff a The pilot's failure to maintain airspeed which resulted in an in
0 The pilot stated all cowl The inadvertent stall by the pilot-in-command while returning
0 At departure, the airplanThe inadequate supervision of the pilot rated student by the C
0 The airplane collided wi The pilot's selection of an unsuitable takeoff area. Contributin
0 The commercial helicopter the pilot's failure to maintain obstacle clearance while hoverin
0 The winds had been 'lighThe pilot's inadequate weather evaluation, which resulted in a
0 The airplane began to lo the blocked lubricating system and unsuitable terrain.
0 The helicopter impacted the
t settling with power encountered by the pilot. A factor was
0 The airplane overran thethe pilot's preflight planning was inadequate which resulted in
0 According to a statementthe carburetor icing conditions and the fact that the aircraft w
0 While in cruise flight a Failure of the number two cylinder main bearing for undeterm
0 While at hover, about 15the pilot allowed the helicopter to get too low while hovering,
0 The airplane was fueled,The pilot's failure to maintain airspeed, which resulted in a sta
0 When the pilot started t Failure of the coolant recovery system, resulting in overheatin
0 The airplane nosed over the left main landing gear brake was locked during landing. A
0 The pilot stated he lost The pilot's inadequate compensation for the wind conditions.
0 Although the person pilotThe excessive rate at which the student pilot allowed the aircr
0 According to the studentThe failure of the student pilot to maintain directional control
0 The pilot was taxiing fro The pilot's inadequate visual lookout while taxiing to the runw
0 After applying and achiethe pilot's misjudgment of his altitude/clearance above the run
0 The pilot departed his prLoss of total engine power due to a fractured crankshaft.
0 The experimental, amateu The loss of control while maneuvering for an undetermined re
0 The 21 year old private The pilot in command exercising poor judgment and exceedin
0 The experimental amateur aircraft control not attained by the pilot.
0 The pilot reported that inadequate airspeed on takeoff that resulted in a stall/mush co
0 The pilot departed on Rua partial power loss for undetermined reason(s).
0 The helicopter sustainedThe pilot's inadequate in-flight planning/decision to attempt a
0 The pilot initiated his The pilot inadvertently stalling the airplane. Factors were the
0 The pilot reported that wThe pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control.
0 The pilot stated his per The pilots failure to calculate his takeoff distance for the cond
0 The airplane departed fr The pilot's improper aircraft handling as a result of his alcohol
0 According to the first p The failure of the pilot-in-command (CFI) to adequately superv
0 The commercial certificaThe pilot-in-command's inadvertent stalling of the airplane.
0 The Cessna 182R pilot reThe pilot's improper flare on touchdown resulting in a hard lan
0
0 During an aerial applicatThe complete loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 The pilot was approaching The pilot's failure to approach the strip with adequate airspee
0 The student pilot perfor The pilot's delay in aborting the takeoff.
0 After losing engine poweA loss of power due to overheating resulting from the failure o
0 The airplane received suInadequate preflight planning and the pilot's delay in aborting
0 The private pilot was la Failure to adequately compensate for wind conditions.
0 The glider was towed to 1 The pilot's improper in-flight decision to continue the flight wit
0 The pilot departed at 11 Fuel exhaustion of the engine due to improper fuel consumpti
0 According to the pilot a The pilot's failure to use proper remedial action to counteract
0 After 45 minutes of fligh The pilot's improper fuel tank selector position resulting in fue
0 The airplane was damaged the open carburetor heat air box resulting in a loss of engine p
0 The airplane was damaged the improper recovery from the bounced landing and the porp
0 The pilot reported he wathe loss of main rotor rpm due to the failure of the top engine
0 The airplane was destroyThe pilot not maintaining airplane control in his turn back in th
0 The open-cockpit biplanethe loss of engine power over unsuitable terrain due to an ino
Page 249
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The helicopter collided wPilot's improper decision to depart a confined area with two pe
0 During a touch and go laThe pilot's inaccurate recovery from a bounced landing. Facto
0 The pilot said that upon the brakes not available to the pilot. Factors were the improp
0 At the completion of a c Failure by the pilot to follow procedures and lower the landing
0 The airplane was operateThe power loss for undetermined reasons and unsuitable terra
0 The flight was returning The pilot experienced spatial disorientation, which resulted in
0 The pilot returned to hi The pilot's entering an inadvertent stall condition during a hig
0 During cruise flight, a The inadequate installation of the right propeller by the mecha
0 According to the pilot, t the total failure of the clutch cable during landing, which resul
0 The pilot said that duri The pilot's inadvertent stall/mush during a go-around attempt
0 The left wing impacted t the pilot failed to maintain control of the airplane during flare/
0 The flight was conductedthe excessive brakes applied by the second pilot. A factor to t
0 The private certificated The pilot's excessive application of the airplane's brakes.
0 During the takeoff roll, The pilot's failure to attain adequate airspeed before liftoff, wh
0 The non-instrument rated The pilot's inadequate preflight planning which resulted in exh
0 The private pilot departeThe failure of the pilot to maintain control of the airplane due
0 The airplane lost engine A loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 The airplane was perform Aircraft control not being maintained by the pilot during the fo
0 The experimental floatpla aircraft control not maintained by the pilot.
0 The experimental airplane The unsuitable terrain the pilot selected during his emergency
0 The pilot was departing aThe pilot's inadequate compensation for crosswind conditions.
0 The private pilot was lanThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control while landing
0 The pilot said he was a The pilot's improper landing flare.
0 The helicopter had a tail The helicopter had a tail rotor failure. The reason for the failu
0 Visual meteorological coThe pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control. A factor was the
0 During landing on runway The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions. A fa
0 The single-engine airpla the airplane's in-flight collision with hilly terrain for undetermi
0 The pilot reported that the pilot selected the wrong runway direction in which to land
0 The pilot entered a downThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control.
0 Once in the terminal areThe pilot's delayed use of the brakes, which resulted in a runw
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's improper recovery from a bounced landing and sub
0 The pilot of the agricult The pilot's intentional flight into adverse weather which result
0 The pilot had just purch The pilot's failure to compensate for the wind conditions. Fact
0 The commercial pilot repo the non-pilot rated passenger's improper flare and not relinqu
0 The hospital helicopter the pilot's inadequate preflight and improper vertical takeoff a
0 The airplane was damaged The pilots failure to maintain directional control. A factor was
0 The airplane impacted teVFR flight into IMC encountered by the pilot and exceeding the
0 The pilot arrived at his The pilot's delayed go-around, which resulted in the aircraft no
0 The airplane was in a lefThe pilot's loss of control of the airplane while turning from ba
0 The amateur-built experiThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control during landin
0 The student pilot departethe student pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane d
0 The flight instructor was The flight instructor's failure to maintain directional control. A
0 The pilot of the towplan the pilot's failure to maintain control of the glider while maneu
0 The airplane touched dow the pilot's inability to maintain airplane control during the land
0 The pilot said that whil The pilot's failure to extend the landing gear, which resulted in
0 A gyrocopter was presume undetermined.
0 The pilot stated that thi The pilot's misjudgment of airspeed and altitude resulting in a
0 While airdropping a cargEntanglement of air-dropped cargo parachute with the aircraft
0 The pilot reported that aA loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. A factor wa
0 The airplane collided wi The pilot inadvertently became lost/disoriented during initial c
Page 250
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The pilot departed with fPilot's improper fuel calculations, which resulted in fuel exhau
0 The experimental glider The pilot's inadvertent flight into adverse weather conditions w
0 The pilot reported the a the pilot exceeded the VNE speed restriction of 144 MPH. Fac
0 A witness flying in the The pilot's failure to maintain flying speed during an emergen
0 During a routine aerial aThe pilot's failure to maintain clearance from power lines.
0 The flight had proceeded
0 The pilot reported, "I t the pilot failed to maintain directional control during landing.
0 While descending through A loss of engine power for undetermined reason(s). A factor w
0 The pilot had performed The partial loss of power caused by detonation of the #3 pisto
0
0 Near the end of a cross-cA loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion, which resulted
0 The pilot reported that dThe loss of control by the pilot due to incapacitation for unkno
0 The pilot said he had go loss of engine power for undetermined reasons and the pilot's
0 The pilot reported he waThe pilot failed to maintain directional control of the airplane w
0 Witnesses reported that A loss of aircraft control for undetermined reasons.
0 During a cross county fl The pilot's improper decision to attempt a second takeoff from
0 A witness traveling souththe inadvertent stall. Factors relating to the accident were the
0 The airplane collided wi The pilot's failure to follow published instrument approach pro
0 According to a witness, athe pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane during the
0 During takeoff, prior to The loss of control in hovering flight and impact with terrain fo
0 The engine lost power sho Fuel exhaustion and the pilot's failure the refuel the airplane.
0 The airplane exited the the pilot not maintaining directional control of the airplane. Fa
0 The airport manager saidThe student pilot not maintaining directional control during th
0 The pilot's inadequate planning by which he miscalculated fue
0 The airplane sustained su the dual student's improper response to a simulated engine fa
0 The helicopter impacted the simulated autorotation performed by the pilot at too low a
0 The airplane sustained su the water contamination found in the fuel and the pilot misjud
0 The airplane was damaged the misjudged flare and porpoise encountered during landing
0 A Cessna 150 sustained sthe maneuver, performed by the pilot, to avoid obstructions o
0 The pilot reported that wThe pilot failed to maintain control of the airplane during an in
0 Witness's reported that Improper preflight planning/preparation by the pilot, which r
0 The pilot picked up a ba The pilot's inadequate flare during the landing. Factors were t
0 The pilot reported that hwas the pilot's improper fuel management which resulted in p
0 The pilot stated that he a loss of engine power for undetermined reasons resulting in a
0 The homebuilt helicopterThe pilot/owner's inadequate installation of an ignition lead th
0 The flight was cleared foThe pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane during th
0 The agricultural airplan The unsuitable terrain for landing encountered by the pilot du
0 The airplane departed onthe pilot's inadequate preflight planning, his failure to abort th
0 The private certificated The pilots selection of unsuitable terrain for landing. A factor
0 The pilot reported that An inadequately performed short field landing procedure and
0 After completing a practiThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the lan
0 The pilot taxied onto th The pilot's decision to takeoff with only partial engine power a
0 The pilot/owner stated t a loss of engine power for undetermined reason, resulting in a
0 The pilot briefed the pa The passenger's failure to comply with the briefing administer
0 According to the pilot, The pilot's failure to maintain clearance from a bush during th
0 Shortly after takeoff, t The pilot's use of excessive braking on soft terrain. Factors in
0 The airplane nosed over Inadequate preflight planning/preparation by the pilot, which r
0 The commercial pilot wasThe pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions. Fac
0 The private pilot was pe The CFI's delayed remedial action.
0 This was the first flight a loss of control which resulted in an inadvertent stall at too lo
Page 251
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The agricultural airplan the fractured number three exhaust push rod assembly and th
0 While attempting a practThe pilot's improper use of flight controls that resulted in low r
0 The pilot preformed a noThe pilot's failure of preflight planning preparation, which resu
0 The commercial certificaThe pilot's inadequate preflight planning/preparation. Factors
0 the failure of the pilots of the two airplanes to see and avoid e
0 The student pilot reporteAn inadequately planned approach. The encounter of wake tu
0 Following the arrival at The pilot's failure to remove the control lock during his preflig
0 Prior to the annual insp The mechanic's inadequate annual inspection, which resulted
0 The airplane lost engine The student pilot's inadequate preflight planning which includ
0
0 The pilot reported that Inadequate maintenance and the pilot's failure to maintain air
0 The station manager of an The pilot's inadequate recovery from a bounced landing. Fact
0 Shortly after takeoff, a Loss of engine power due to a fracture and separation of the e
0 With the student pilot in The pilot's failure to maintain a climb during climbout. A facto
0 The pilot stated that h the pilot's failure to perform a weight and balance check that
0 The pilot was landing witThe pilot's inadequate compensation for wind and his failure t
0 The pilot said that the The pilot's inadequate compensation for the downdraft conditi
0 The airplane had been aiPilot's improper pre-flight planning, which resulted in a loss of
0 The airplane drifted slig The pilot's failure to maintain obstacle clearance during takeo
0 The airplane received suthe landing gear not deployed, the checklist not followed, the
0 The Stinson was performin the failure of both pilots to maintain visual lookout. A contribu
0 A Cessna 208B sustainedthe pilot of the other airplane not maintaining clearance while
0 While conducting fire su Compressor turbine blade failure due to high-cycle fatigue init
0 The day before the accide The pilot's improper decision to continue the flight into deterio
0 During an emergency land Adjustment by other maintenance personnel of the idle speed
0 On a for-hire sightseeingThe pilot's failure to use pibals or other on site wind determina
0 The Stinson was performin the failure of both pilots to maintain visual lookout. A contribu
0 The private pilot stated The pilot's inadequate evaluation of the winds, and his intentio
0 Several minutes prior to The pilot-in-command's inadequate weather evaluation, which
0
0 The aircraft ditched in A catastrophic internal engine failure for undetermined reason
0 During the cross-countryA hidden depression in the ground that resulted in the collaps
0 During landing in a cros The pilot's inadequate compensation for a gusting crosswind t
0 The pilot said that he o the pilot's failure to maintain a proper glide path and proper v
0 During landing, at the coLack of crew coordination when the ground crew failed to hold
0 The surviving passenger,The pilot's improper inflight decision to enter a valley at low a
0 The airplane was returninfuel starvation due to the blocked carburetor. Factors relating
0 The pilot was conductingThe pilot's improper use of takeoff checklist procedures, and h
0 The pilot said he was lanThe pilot's failure to touchdown at the proper point on the land
0 The pilot reported that wAn improper flare which lead to a hard landing and subsequen
0 While maneuvering to loo The pilot's failure to maintain an airspeed above stalling speed
0 The pilot reported that wThe pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control. A factor was the
0 On a bright night, the p The pilot's failure to attain proper alignment with the runway d
0
0 During cruise flight, the the pilot's inadvertent activation of the left rudder control, wh
0 There were some cows on the pilot's failure to maintain obstacle clearance during landin
0 At the completion of a c The pilot's failure to follow procedures and lower the landing g
0 The pilot bounced the la The pilot's improper recovery from a bounced landing.
0 The 'push-pull's' rear en The pilot's failure to maintain airspeed, resulting from his imp
1 At 1247, during cruise fl The crankshaft's fatigue failure at the site of an electrical arc m
Page 252
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 During landing roll out Pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the landing
0 This was the pilot's firs the pilot's failure to maintain obstacle clearance. A contributin
0 While on short final for the electrical wire bundle fire during approach, which tripped
0 During landing, the airp The inadequate structural materials (American manufactured
0 The airplane impacted hethe pilot's improper in-flight decision, the pilot's continued flig
0 The airplane was perform The inadvertent stall/spin encountered by the pilot. A factor w
0 The pilot departed anothe The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions, resu
0 The Air Tractor was on a the failure of both pilots to maintain a visual outlook during la
0 The pilot was making an Thea disconnection of the left tailwheel control cable spring res
0 The flight instructor st The flight instructor's failure to identify a partial loss of engine
0 The amateur-built airplanThe failure and separation of one wooden propeller blade for u
0 The pilot's failure to maintain terrain clearance. Factors includ
0 The Air Tractor was on a the failure of both pilots to maintain a visual outlook during la
0 During initial climb foll Failure by the pilot in command to maintain control of the airc
0 The pilot reported that, the misjudged glidepath by the pilot. Factors to the accident
0 The pilot preformed a doAircraft control not being maintained during initial climb result
0 The pilot conducted a pr The pilot's failure to clear trees, for undetermined reasons.
0 The glider was observed The student pilot's failure to maintain airspeed on final approa
0 While in the cruise porti The pilot's inadequate preflight planning and fuel consumption
0 The right main landing gThe fatigue failure and separation of the right main landing ge
0 According to the pilot, The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control. A factor was the
0 During touchdown for land The pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the aircraft
0 The pilot stated he had eThe pilot's failure to maintain an adequate lookout. Factors in
0 The pilot stated he began The pilot's selection of an unsuitable takeoff area on the airstr
0 The airplane's engine losThe loss of engine power due to water contamination of the fu
0 The pilot reported that hThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the ba
0 The pilot receiving inst The pilot receiving instruction failure to achieve the proper tou
0 Following a total loss o the fuel exhaustion and inadequate preflight planning/prepara
0 The pilot said that he 'D the pilot's failure to refuel the aircraft prior to the flight and ex
0 The pilot said that duri the pilot's long touchdown, and inadequate braking to stop on
0 While en route to his fi The pilot's failure to apply carburetor heat after experiencing
0 The pilot was observed The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control while performing
0 The 80-hour private pilo The pilot's improper go-around procedure and his failure to ma
0
0 The airplane was in crui Fracture of the #4 connecting rod for undetermined reasons,
The airplane bounced dur the go-around not performed and the inadequate flare by the
0 The Milwaukee County She The spatial disorientation by the pilot during continued flight i
0 During a local instructi The pilot's inability to control the aircraft after landing due to
0 The pilot had experienceThe pilot's failure to preflight plan adequate fuel for the flight
0 The student pilot depart The partial loss of power due to an inadequate annual inspect
0 The pilot stated he wa The pilot's improper judgment to conduct a precautionary land
0 The pilot departed in his the pilot's inadequate preflight inspection, and his failure to ve
0 Witnesses reported that T t he pilot's failure to maintain directional control during landin
0 A witness/commercial pilthe pilot's failure to maintain control of the aircraft while mane
0 Witnesses located near tthe pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control while maneuverin
0 The pilot said his fligh the pilot not maintaining aircraft control in response to the un
0 During cruise flight the The in-flight fracture of the main rotor mast and the separatio
0 The pilot, who had not c The pilot's improper decision to continue the takeoff after the
0 The pilot was executing aThe pilot's excessive use of brakes. Contributing factors were
0 The pilot was returning The pilot's delayed recovery from a bounced landing.
Page 253
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 A day earlier, while maneAn engine seizure due to improper reconditioning of piston/cy
0 The accident airplane waThe pilot's failure to maintain a proper glide path to the runwa
0 The pilot was flying the The pilot's improper judgment not to sit in the pilot's seat (rea
0 During the second flight the pilot's failure to provide enough fuel for the intended fligh
0 The flight instructor wa The loss of engine power due to fuel starvation, which resulted
0 During landing roll at t The pilot's failure to maintain control of the aircraft during lan
0 The pilot said that on de the failure of wing lift strut attachment rod for an unknown rea
0 The homebuilt gyroplaneAploss of control for undetermined reasons.
0 While on the last leg of The pilot's inability to locate the airport, which resulted in fuel
0 The airplane landed hardFailure of the pilot to maintain directional control on the landin
0 After about 45 minutes of The pilot's failure to maintain control during landing. A factor w
0 According to the pilot, d the failure of the supercharger during takeoff. A contributing
0 The student pilot attempThe student pilot's delayed landing flare and failure to recover
0
0 The airplane sustained sthe brake fire while taxiing for undetermined reasons.
0 According to the pilot, a Failure of the right brake expander tube which limited the pilo
0 The certificated private The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions. Fac
0 The certificated private The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions. A fa
0 The airplane impacted the the pilot's failure to maintain adequate terrain clearance durin
0 The pilot reported that Debonding between the elastomeric material and the center p
0 The pilot reported that the failure of the pilot to maintain directional control during la
0 The pilot stated that he the pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed resulting in a
0 The pilot stated that up the pilot's inadequate preflight planning/preparation which res
0 The pilot said that he w the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing. Contributing
0 The corporate airplane wthe aircraft control not maintained by the pilot. A contributing
0 The commercial certificated pilot, an owner of a fishing lodge, departed a remote area
0 During a simulated enginA hard landing by a pilot of a previous flight. Additional cause
0 the loss of left engine power as a result of the owner's failure
0 During a telephone conve The pilot's failure to adequately compensate for wind conditio
0 The pilot had been awake The pilot's failure to maintain the proper glide path to the runw
0 While at 3,000 feet with The flight instructor's improper placement of both fuel-selecto
0 The airplane climbed to An engine compartment explosion due to a fuel/fuel vapor lea
0 The pilot stated that wh The pilots failure to drop the advertising banner prior to a prec
0 The pilot stated that du the pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed during the ta
0 The pilot said he was sp the cracked number 7 cylinder exhaust valve. A factor relatin
0 The balloon contacted poThe pilot failed to maintain clearance with the power lines. Fa
0 While within a two mile fAircraft control was not maintained during approach for landin
0 The airplane was departiThe pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during the takeo
0 The pilot said that duri the pilot's improper landing flare which resulted the right wing
0 The pilot stated that wh a loss of engine power due to undetermined reasons, that resu
0 The pilot stated that dur failure of the pilot to maintain directional control of the aircraf
0 The aircraft collided wit The loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 The engine lost power duThe engine lost power for undetermined reasons and nosed ov
0 The glider was returningThe pilot exceeded the airspeed limit for operation of the flaps
0 While maneuvering at 700 The fracture and separation of a control rod in the cyclic flight
0 Shortly after take-off, A broken carburetor jet needle, which blocked fuel from enter
0 The airplane sustained sthe pilot not maintaining clearance from the fence post and no
0 The airplanes collided in The pilot of the Pitts misjudged the clearance while maneuver
0 The instrument rated pil The pilot's improper pre-flight planning, and in-flight planning
0 The pilot stated that he the pilot's improper preflight planning/decision and failure to e
Page 254
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 255
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 256
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The airplane sustained sthe pilot not maintaining directional control of the airplane. Fa
0 The airplane collided wi The pilot did not properly flare the airplane during the aborted
0 The pilot reported that The loss of engine power due to fuel system contamination.
0 While enroute to the sta The failure of the number six-piston connecting rod that result
0 The commercial pilot wasThe pilot's inadvertent stall/mush during the final approach to
0 A Cherokee was in the tra Failure of local controller to provide adequate spacing betwee
0 The airplane lost power Separation of the forward spark plug due to wear damage to t
0 On the landing roll the a Failure of the student pilot to maintain directional control of th
0 The pilot was cleared to the pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control, which resulted in
0 A Cherokee was in the tra Failure of local controller to provide adequate spacing betwee
0 The private certificated The pilot's selection of unsuitable terrain for landing. A factor
0 An airline transport pilo The failure of the TRACON air traffic controller to issue a wake
0 The pilot said that immed The loss of aircraft control precipitated by the pilot's inadverte
0 The Cessna 172 (N53201) The Cessna 172 pilot's failure to maintain clearance with the C
0 The Cessna 172 (N53201) The Cessna 172 pilot's failure to maintain clearance with the C
0 The student pilot had bethe failure of the #3 and #4 connecting rods. A contributing
0 The pilot reported he was the owner/builder's inadequate modification to the engine air
0 A passenger fractured heThe ground crew's failure to maintain control of the balloon un
0 During a practice instru The failure of the right main landing gear drag leg (scissors) a
0 The aircraft took off wit The pilot-in-command/flight instructor's failure to adequately r
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's inadequate compensation for the wind condition. W
0 The pilot had completed The
a pilot's improper decision to fly with an insufficient fuel qua
0 The private certificated A failure of the pilot to maintain directional control of the airpl
0 The private pilot was lanA malfunctioning main landing gear brake, which precipitated
0 The pilot was attemptingThe pilot's inadequate compensation for winds and his failure
0 The pilot reported that A partial power loss for undetermined reasons.
0 A witness observed the aThe pilot's failure to maintain clearance with the antenna guy
0 The certificated commerci The pilot's inadequate compensation for wind conditions. Fac
0 The pilot was unable to The pilot's inadequate compensation for the wind, and his failu
0 The pilot applied full po the pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the airplane
0 The airplane struck the Loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. A factor was
0 The pilot said he landed The pilot prematurely flaring the airplane, resulting in a hard l
0 The pilot filed an IFR The pilot's improper inflight decision to enter a canyon at an a
0 The pilot said that he ' the pilot exceeding the proper touchdown point on the runway
0 The private certificated The pilot's application of excessive braking. A factor in the ac
0 A Cessna 182P and a Cessn The other pilot's improper use (inadvertent release) of the bra
0 A Cessna 182P and a Cessn The pilot's improper use (inadvertent release) of the brakes. C
0 The pilot noted the airp the intentional stall/mush by the pilot-in-command due to obs
0 On the landing rollout t Failure of the right clip that attaches a spring to the tail wheel
0 According to the pilot, The pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the airplan
0 The pilot made two low pThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the lan
0 The pilot said that durin the delayed aborted takeoff. Factors relating to this accident
0 The pilot was unable to m The improper servicing of the left main landing gear tire which
0 A pilot witnessed the ai The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane after land
0 Due to a loss of engine An improper engine installation by other maintenance personn
0 The pilot was executing The loss of engine power during the takeoff initial climb, for an
0 The ranch foreman told th The pilot's failure to maintain lateral clearance with terrain. F
0 Witnesses described the Thea pilot/passenger's failure to maintain aircraft control, and t
0 The 39-hour student pilotThe student pilot's failure to refuel, which resulted in fuel exha
0 Witnesses observed the a The pilot failed to maintain clearance from the trees. A factor
Page 257
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 258
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 While spraying herbicideThe pilot's failure to maintain clearance from guy wires and to
0 The airplane impacted cothe pilots failure to abort the takeoff and obtain/maintain clea
0 The pilot reported that 4The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control upon experiencin
0 The recently certificatedThe pilot's failure to maintain clearance from terrain while turn
0 The pilot planned a crossThe failure of the pilot to refuel the airplane, which resulted in
0 The pilot topped off the the pilot's improper fuel consumption calculations, which resu
0 Two people, a father andloss of control during initial climb following takeoff by an unqu
0 The pilot was to perform the pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control while maneuverin
0 The pilot said he was fly fuel contamination (water) and the pilot exceeding his landing
0 The experimental airplanThe pilot's failure to maintain flying airspeed during initial clim
0 The pilot departed the a The pilot's inadvertent flight into instrument meteorological co
0 According to a witness, The pilot's improper recovery from a bounced landing.
0 The airplane collided witthe pilot's in-flight decision to continue flight into instrument w
0 Upon entering the downwi The loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 During the takeoff, the The pilot's failure to refuel resulting in loss of engine power du
0 The pilot said that durin The pilot's failure to maintain a proper descent rate during lan
0 The pilot landed long on The pilot's misjudgment of speed and distance which resulted
0 The certificated commerci The pilot's selection of an unsuitable takeoff area. Factors ass
0 While in a descent, the pThe pilot's failure to properly manage the fuel onboard the air
0 The pilot stated that he The pilot's inadvertent VFR flight into instrument meteorologic
0 The airplane was destroySuicide
0 The uncertified pilot re The uncertified pilot's improper recovery from a bounced land
0 While positioning the helImproper torquing procedure of the aft tail rotor drive shaft co
0 During a dual instructio The dual student's improper use of the collective and the fligh
0 Shortly after takeoff, t A total loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. A fact
0 According to the airport The loss of engine power for undetermined reasons, and the p
0 The pilot filled the airp The pilot's improper management of the fuel supply, which re
0 The pilot stated he deparA loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion. Also causal wa
0 the pilot's loss of airplane control due to spatial disorientation
0 According to witnesses, the failure of the propeller blade due to fatigue, which originat
0 The amateur-built gyroplThe main rotor contacting with the vertical stabilizer, the loss
0 The certificated airline The pilot's failure to maintain clearance during taxi. A factor a
0 The pilot reported that wOil Pump drive gear shaft separated in shear. A collision with
0 The pilot stated that he The pilot-in-command's failure to maintain directional control
0 The pilot departed on a The pilot's failure to follow instrument flight procedures result
0
0 The airplane impacted a the pilot's inaccurate fuel consumption calculations, improper
0 The certificated airline The pilot's inadequate preflight inspection, which failed to rem
0 During touchdown, the aiThe pilot's improper recovery from a bounced landing.
0 The pilot said he was taxThe failure of the pilot to maintain control of the tail wheel equ
0 Witnesses saw the airplaAn inadvertent pilot-induced porpoise resulting from the pilot'
0 The helicopter rolled ov The pilot's improper storage of personal items and his inadequ
0 The certificated commerc The pilot's delay in aborting the takeoff run. A factor associat
0 The pilot reported that Clearance from an obstruction was not maintained during the
0 The pilot anticipated encThe pilot's hard landing during a high wind condition.
0 The pilot reported that Carburetor icing and the pilot's inadequate in-flight planning b
0 On final approach, the piThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control during an abo
0 The failure of the pilot to operate the airplane according to the
0 The pilot reported that dThe pilot's failure to maintain adequate rotor rpm. Unsuitable
0 The airplane touched dow The pilot's inadequate flare which resulted in a hard landing.
Page 259
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 260
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 According to the pilot a The failure of the pilot to maintain clearance with the power li
0 The airplane was destroyThe inadequate remedial action the flightcrew had during the
0
0 The airplane departed, an The pilot's failure to check both fuel tanks visually during the p
0 After take off, and leve The collapsing of the inner liner of the induction air hose, resu
0 The pilot said that duri the pilot misjudging the landing flare, and his failure to recove
0 The airplane was damaged the evasive maneuver not possible by the pilot and the deer o
0 The failure of the pilot of N331DM to maintain a proper visual
0 The pilot of N56JP state The failure of the pilot of N56JP, during landing rollout, to see
0 The pilot, who was awareThe pilot's failure to abort the takeoff when it became questio
0 The glider was approxima The pilot's improper in-flight decision to abort the glide toward
0 The flight instructor sta an inadvertent inflight collision with a bird during cruise flight
0 The pilot stated that du The pilot's failure to maintain airspeed on final approach resul
0 The failure of the pilot of N331DM to maintain a proper visual
0 The pilot of N56JP state The failure of the pilot of N56JP, during landing rollout, to see
0 The pilot said that on in The airplane's encounter with a strong updraft at the end of th
0 The pilot encountered tuFuel starvation of the engine, caused by the fracturing of the f
0 The airplane experiencedThe loss of engine power over unsuitable terrain due to fuel st
0 The experimental airplanthe pilot not obtaining/maintaining clearance from the fence.
0 The airplane sustained sthe evasive maneuver initiated by the pilot. Factors were the
0 The airplane was substanthe loose carburetor heat control clamp bolt and carburetor he
0 The pilot stated that he The pilot's failure to maintain Vs during takeoff/initial climb, w
0 During a climbing turn a The failure of the pilot to secure a fabric panel during preflight
0 A hard autorotation landA total loss of engine power due to the failure of the engine m
0 The airplane collided wi A local windshear condition that exceeded the airplane's climb
0 The airplane lost engine the inadequate preflight by the pilot which resulted in the fuel
0 A witness observed the gA main rotor blade strike (impact) with both a pusher propelle
0 The pilot stated that as The pilot's failure to abort the takeoff upon experiencing direc
0 The pilot reported that An improperly planned approach which resulted in an inadvert
0 The airplane impacted mo The pilot's inadequate weather evaluation and attempted VFR
0 The airplane encountered the carburetor ice and after takeoff, the unsuitable terrain the
0 The pilot made a power-o The pilot's inadequate in-flight planning that resulted in fuel st
0 The airplane was flying The pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed resulting in a
0 The airplane was destroye The pilot not maintaining proper glideslope and localizer align
0 The instructor ordered thThe dual student's habit interference, from his previous trainin
the pilot's loss of control of the aircraft during initial/takeoff cl
0 The airplane struck treesThe pilot's failure to maintain proper runway alignment on dep
0 The instructor stated thathe dual student's improper use of the brakes and the flight in
2 The airplane collided wi The engine lost power for undetermined reasons.
0 During en route cruise f Total blockage of the instrument static system due to ice.
0 Airport personnel heard the loss of engine power for undetermined reasons, and the p
0 A private certificated p The pilot's inadequate preflight planning/preparation, and inad
0 The pilot and passenger The pilot's decision not to deviate to an alternate airport for fu
0 The airplane departed, an Total loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 The pilot stated that dur The failure of the pilot to maintain directional control during la
0 The aircraft was observed undetermined.
0 The private certificated The pilot's inadequate compensation for a bounced landing, a
0 The helicopter departed the loss of engine power due to an internal engine oil leak tha
0 During the landing flare the pilot's failure to follow procedures/directives and lower the
0 The pilot was executing Failure by the pilot to follow instrument approach procedures
Page 261
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 During a precautionary lathe misjudged touchdown point by the pilot. Factors were the
0 The certificated private The pilot's failure to refuel the airplane, and his inadequate pr
0 The pilot stated that he The pilot's failure to follow procedures and directives containe
0
0 The pilot made a touch aCarburetor ice formation due to the pilot's improper use of the
0 The pilot stated that he Improper inspection of the tailwheel assembly by the pilot whi
0 The single engine airpla the pilot's failure to maintain airspeed while maneuvering, wh
0 The instructor reported athe instructor pilot's failure to maintain the airplane's minimum
0 During approach to land The manufacturer's use of improper materials, and inadequate
0 While on a local flight, A hard landing, which exceeded the design stress limits of the
0 The aircraft landed shortthe proper glide path not being maintained by the pilot which
0 While attempting to landThe pilot's failure to attain a proper glide path during the final
0
0 While operating on an IFR The pilot' failure to properly manage the available fuel onboar
The pilot stated his la A runway overrun as a result of the pilot's failure to maintain p
0 The pilot reported that the loss of engine power due to the crankshaft idler gear's loo
0 The airplane impacted thThe pilot's inadequate preflight of the airplane and his failure
0 During a night approach Thet pilot's inadequately executed remedial action and his failu
0 The private pilot report The pilot's improper distance/speed during the approach, whic
0 The pilot reported that s The pilot's failure to verify the airplane's fuel tank selector pos
0 While performing maneuve The failure of the dual magneto ignition system points to open
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during landin
0 Airwork followed by thre The CFI's inadequate supervision of the dual student and the d
0 The pilot contacted Des The pilot not maintaining aircraft control during the final turn,
0 The pilot reported that A loss of power for undetermined reasons.
According to the pilot's The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during landin
a loss of directional control on landing due to the pilot's failure
0 After making a forced lanThe pilot's lack of familiarity with the airplane's fuel system. T
0 The pilot, who made a dar The pilot's failure to maintain clearance from the terrain. Facto
0 During a forced landing Fuel starvation precipitated by the pilot's continued use of the
0 In-flight loss of control resulting in airframe structural failure.
0 During approach, the engi the flight instructor's failure to adequately preflight the airplan
0 The pilot stated that he A total loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 The commercial certificatThe pilot's selection of unsuitable terrain for landing. A factor
0 The pilot's improper recovery from a bounced landing.
0 As the airplane was in t The pilot's misjudgment of altitude and distance to the runway
0 During landing, the noseThe pilot's misjudged landing flare and improper recovery from
0 About 2 hours before depPilot's continued flight into known adverse weather conditions
0 The accident aircraft ha The pilot-in-command's failure to maintain adequate airspeed
0 After a normal preflight The loss of engine power for undetermined reasons. Factors w
0 After soaring for about 1The pilot's misjudged altitude approaching the airstrip and his
0 While in cruise flight t The unsuitable terrain encountered by the pilot during the em
0 The private pilot was la The pilot's improper decision to land on unsuitable terrain. Fa
0 The airplane made a forcThe partial loss of engine power during cruise flight due to an
0 Several friends voluntee the pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane while man
0 The pilot flew for 2 hou The pilot's failure to obtain a pre-departure or en route weathe
0 The student pilot and a fThe student pilot's inadequate use of the collective, and the in
0 During an aborted landinThe pilot's failure to verify the presence of wires near the rem
0 The flight was a rental the total failure of the left main gear strut during the landing r
0 During a telephone conve The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during the takeo
Page 262
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The certificated private The pilot's excessive application of the brakes during landing
0
0 A practice autorotation tThe dual student's misjudged landing flare and level off, which
0 the pilot's failure to maintain an adequate terrain clearance al
0 Five witnesses observed The pilot's decision to land on a highway with vehicle traffic an
0 The student pilot said th The student pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control on the g
0 According to the pilot, The pilot's failure to maintain control of the aircraft during lan
0 the failure of the F-16 flight lead pilot and F-16 accident pilot t
0 The student pilot was la Inadequate remedial action by the first pilot. The student pilo
The aircraft operator repThe failure of the instructor pilot and dual student to begin the
0
0 Failure of the internal cam gear in the remanufactured engine
0 The turbine powered helithe pilot's failure to maintain obstacle clearance while maneuv
0 During a descent, and wh Fatigue of the right propeller blade resulting in an in-flight sep
0 During the climb-out from Overstress loading to the left wing lift strut resulting in the lef
0 After arriving in the ai The pilot's failure to maintain runway alignment during touchd
0 During the takeoff roll, The pilot's failure to remove the gust lock from the control col
0 During the landing rollouThe pilot's failure to maintain directional control on landing ro
0 During initial climbout The cause of the loss of engine power is undetermined. Facto
0 The airplane contacted athe deer that traveled onto the runway and contacted the airp
0 While on final approach tThe pilot's improper flare while landing.
0 The pilot's inadequate preflight. Also causal in the accident w
0 During high-speed taxi t The pilot's improper touchdown which resulted in a hard landi
0 The instructor pilot said the student pilot's inability to maintain aircraft control on the
0 The airplane impacted thThe pilot did not adequately compensate for the wind conditio
0 The airplane nosed over Maintenance personnel misrouted the crankcase breather hos
0 While on a cross-countrya forced landing to unsuitable terrain due to a loss of engine p
0 According to the pilot h a loss of engine power due to fuel contamination resulting in f
0 While returning to the a the total loss of engine power due to carburetor ice. Contribu
0 The student pilot (SP) waThe pilot's failure to obtain the proper touchdown point.
a loss of engine power due to the number 5 cylinder connectin
0
0 Witnesses observed the e the pilot's performance of aerobatic maneuvers at a low altitu
While the pilot/builder w Failure of an airframe stringer due to improper construction by
0 While conducting long-li The pilot's failure to comply with the flight manual regarding t
0 The non-instrument rated the pilot's failure to maintain altitude/clearance from terrain w
0 According to the pilot, d Deer on the runway, which forced the pilot to make an evasive
0
0 While descending through pilot's mismanagement of the available fuel supply, which res
0 The pilot was conductingImproper rigging of both propeller assemblies by maintenance
0
0 The airplane ran off the the student pilots failure to maintain directional control. Facto
0 The non-instrument rated The pilot's failure to obtain a proper touchdown point while lan
0 The single-engine airpla the loss of engine power resulting from carburetor icing condi
0 The Cessna 172 was flyinthe failure of both pilot's to maintain visual lookout during cru
0 The pilot received clear The pilot's loss of control of the airplane while maneuvering. F
0 During a night cross-couthe loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion after the pilot
0 While in cruise on a nig the loss of engine power due to improper splicing of the TIT th
0 The Cessna 172 was flyinthe failure of both pilots to maintain visual lookout during crui
0 During initial climb afte altitude/clearance from the trees not being obtained/maintain
Page 263
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 The airplane was destroyThe pilot's failure to maintain altitude/clearance during the ins
0 According to the pilot, Maintenance personnel failure to properly install engine cowlin
0 According to the pilot, s Fuel system contamination that resulted in fuel starvation.
0 The pilot conducted a pr The flight instructor's failure to maintain aircraft control during
0 The pilot was ferrying th The pilot's failure to follow the restart procedures published in
0 There were two pilots abthe pilot's performance of aerobatic maneuvers at a low altitu
0 The certificated airline The pilot's selection of an unsuitable landing/taxi area. A fact
0 The airplane lost airspe The pilot's improper assessment of in-flight weather condition
0 The airplane landed withThe pilot's inadequate compensation for the existing crosswin
0 While landing, at a spee The pilot's inadequate flare, which resulted in a hard landing.
0 The student pilot was tr The student pilot's failure to maintain a visual look out while t
0 The student pilot report The student pilot's improper flare and improper recovery from
0 the pilot's improper in-flight decision to attempt a landing on a
0 The pilot said that when the failure of the nose landing gear to fully extend due to a be
0 Before the VFR cross couthe pilot's failure to maintain terrain clearance while maneuve
0 According to the pilot, The pilot's improper flare during landing that resulted in a har
0 The pilot began a takeoffThe pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during a left turn
0 The helicopter was return the loss of engine power during cruise flight due to the fatigue
0 The airplane lifted off t The overstress separation of the control yoke from the control
0 The pilot reported that pFuel exhaustion due to refueling was not performed by the pil
0 The pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane, and subs
0
After discharging three pFuel exhaustion during a descent due to an inadequate fuel su
0 While maneuvering on a Thelo flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the flight, the
0 The pilots had been condA loss of engine power during takeoff due to carburetor ice. A
0 The non-instrument rated the pilot's improper weather evaluation, and his failure to mai
0 The purpose of the flightThe CFI's inadequate supervision and failure to maintain contr
0 The pilot stated the air The pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during the landin
0 The airplane sat on the rWater/ice in the fuel system and the pilot's inadequate preflig
0
0 During the landing roll, The pilot's excessive application of main wheel brakes. Factor
0 The pilot made a swath The pilot's failure to maintain a visual lookout during a swath r
0 The pilot stated he atte The pilot's delay in aborting a takeoff after hitting a soft spot (
0 The non-instrument rated the pilot's VFR flight into IMC while in cruise, which resulted in
0 The helicopter was engag the foreign object damage to a main rotor blade, while maneu
0 The purpose of the fligh The pilot misjudged his practice approach into a remote pinna
0 The pilot said he was fl the lack of suitable terrain for a forced landing. Contributing f
0 The non-instrument rated the pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control while maneuverin
0 The airplane nosed over The pilot's inadequate preflight of the airplane which resulted
0 With a fight instructor, The flight instructor's improper decision to allow his student to
0 The student pilot was praThe student pilot's inadequate recovery from a bounced landin
0 The pilot was on approa The pilot's premature extension of the speed brakes on landin
0
0 Night visual meteorologithe loss of control during takeoff initial climb due to the bindin
0 The pilot reported that The pilot's failure to adequately compensate for wind conditio
0 The certified flight in The certified flight instructors disregard of an FAA weather for
0 According to air traffic the pilot's failure to follow the instrument approach procedure
0
0 The pilot's inadequate preflight planning and weather evaluat
0 the pilot's in-flight loss of control for undetermined reasons.
Page 264
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
0 While enroute to Lakeland The loss of engine power due to fuel starvation resulting from
0 The pilot was performingThe pilot's delay in lowering the collective during a run-on lan
0 The airplane was clearedthe flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the dual stude
0 The airplane had sat dorTotal loss of engine power due to fuel contamination (water),
0 The flight was maneuveriThe pilot's failure to maintain airplane control due to spatial d
0 An FAA contract tower con An inflight loss of control by both pilots while maneuvering, wh
0 During the practice 180-d The pilot-in-command's inadequate supervision of the second
0 The passenger committed suicide.
0 The student pilot said th the student pilot's failure to maintain directional control during
0 During descent at the enthe pilot's inadvertent VFR flight into IMC, which resulted in a
0 The commercial certificaThe failure of a mechanic to ensure the throttle linkage was se
0 The non-instrument rated the pilot's VFR flight into instrument meteorological conditions
0 The airplane was damaged The pilot not attaining the proper glidepath on the instrument
0 The pilot stated that he the pilot's improper inflight planning/decision and failure to fo
0 The private pilot was recthe certified flight instructor's (CFI) failure to maintain directio
0 During cruise flight, the the lack of suitable terrain for a forced landing. A factor was a
0 The private certificated The loss of engine power during the landing approach due to t
0 A student pilot, accompaThe delayed remedial action by the pilot/instructor of another
0 The amateur-built experim The failure of the landing gear axle for undetermined reasons.
0 While en route at 1,000 fThe flight instructor's inadequate supervision of his student an
0 The pilot conducted a pr The pilot's inadequate preflight during the pre-buy inspection,
0 The student pilot/owner o The flight instructor's delayed remedial action during the land
- Insufficient lubrication within the tail rotor gearbox, which resu
0 During a local night VFR The pilot's failure to attain the proper touchdown point. Facto
0 After the airline transpo the flight instructor's failure to maintain directional control du
0 The airplane landed 15 fThe proper touchdown point not obtained/maintained by the p
0 The airplane impacted the The pilot failed to maintain control of the airplane during take
0 During initial climbout a The reason for the loss of engine power is undetermined. A fa
0 The pilot stated that wh The pilot's improper approach for landing while making a land
The airplane sustained sThe pilot not maintaining directional control during the landing
0 The flight crew was retu The flight crew's decision to continue VFR flight into instrumen
0 While on an extended dow A loss of engine power for undetermined reasons during an ex
0 During landing from a vi A hard landing which exceeded the design stress limits of the
The pilot reported that wA malfunction of the aircraft's fuel selector valve and subsequ
The pilot and passenger The pilot-in-command's failure to maintain sufficient altitude w
0 The pilot stated that he the pilot's failure to maintain adequate clearance during takeo
0 About 20 feet above the The pilot's incapacitation that resulted from nausea during the
0 During the landing roll, the failure of the right main landing gear actuator.
0 Shortly after liftoff to The student pilot's abrupt control input, which resulted in a ta
0 During a forced landing pThe pilot's inadequate in-flight planning, fuel management, an
While the pilot attempted The pilot's improper starting procedure, which resulted in an o
0 The pilot stated that he A loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
0 As the airplane made a fu Total failure of the right hand flap control rod due to construct
0
0 During short final on th The pilot's misjudged flare of the airplane resulting from restri
0 The pilot said that he de The pilot's inadequate planning and preparation, which resulte
0 The flight instructor st the flight crew's failure to follow procedures for a straight-in a
0 The airline transport rat the pilot's improper preflight and failure to refuel the airplane.
According to the pilot, The failure of the pilot to maintain aircraft control about the ai
0 The pilot reported that aThe pilot's inadvertent encounter with a pothole during taxi, a
Page 265
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
The pilot said that she the pilot's failure to mantain directional control during landing
The unsuitable terrain for landing selected by the student pilo
0 Undetermined. Missing airplane.
The pilot reported that Three out of four snap rings holding the pistons for the landing
During an aerial survey While maneuvering, clearance from an object was not maintai
the failure of the pilot to maintain directional control.
0 During a repositioning fl The loss of control for reasons undetermined.
0 The student pilot had pr The pilot's improper airplane handling technique and inadequa
The loss of directional control by the student pilot and the inad
0
The pilot flared for lan An inadvertent stall. Factors were excessive airspeed, excess
While practicing a short-The proper glide path not maintained by the pilot. A factor to
Page 266
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
d failure to maintain adequate clearance from objects, resulting in the gyroplane's main rotor colliding with a fence and su
decision and continued visual flight into instrument meteorological conditions (IMC) that resulted in an in-flight collision wi
path on the ILS approach, the pilot's improper decision to continue the approach below the glidepath, and the pilot's failure
ter's descent rate during a planned approach to a hover. Factors include uneven terrain.
MC conditions. Factors were the pilot's inadequate preflight planning and snow showers.
Page 267
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
proach clearance, and subsequent descent into unprotected airspace which resulted in a collision with the guy wire. Facto
esulted in a loss of engine power during aerial application and a subsequent collision with the ground.
nt, and his failure to maintain a visual lookout. Factors were the pilot's improper weather evaluation, his lack of recent ex
he right main landing gear strut during landing resulting in collapse of the right main landing gear.
ar as a result of fatigue, which resulted in a forced landing. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
rbine wheel fracture resulting from fatigue for undetermined reasons that resulted in an autorotation to unsuitable terrain
mpt to close the pilot's door during the takeoff roll, which delayed the aborted takeoff and resulted in the overrun. A factor
ff. A factor was the open cabin door.
e to ice and improper maintenance which resulted in further restricting the line. A factor in this accident was the below free
onal control of the airplane during the takeoff roll.
g, which resulted in a downwind landing. A factor was the loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
d while maneuvering in the traffic pattern, which resulted in a stall/spin. Factors were the partial failure of the landing gear
anding roll due to panic after hearing another pilot report landing on the opposite runway resulting in the pilot losing direct
e flight for unknown reasons resulting in a forced landing in a plowed field.
after encountering a dynamic rollover.
control during landing roll.
mum controllable airspeed following a loss of engine power during the initial takeoff climb. Contributing factors to the acc
tained by the dual student during an attempted running takeoff and the inadequate supervision of the pilot-in-command (C
ve ice and snow from the airplane. A contributing factor was the pilot's inability to maintain control during climb due to de
e throttles; the flight instructor's inadequate supervision; and the delayed remedial action by the flight instructor. Factors
way condition, his decision to operate the airplane on unsuitable terrain, and the failure to maintain runway centerline alig
the wings prior to takeoff resulting in the aircraft not climbing after takeoff and colliding with a tree.
ck in the #6 cylinder. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
ectional control of the airplane while taxiing after landing resulting in the on-ground collision with high vegetation.
er remedial action of the pilot during the landing attempt.
e maneuvering beneath a telephone line.
plane prior to departure.
o undetermined reasons and unsuitable terrain encountered by the pilot-in-command (CFI), during the forced landing.
nti-skid brake system due to the slush contaminated runway. Factors were the freezing rain encountered during the appro
in rotor rpm, which resulted in a hard landing.
s aloft for the planned cross country flight with a preflight weather briefing and inadequate fuel consumption calculations p
ng in that he did not perform a fuel calculation, and his failure to verify the fuel quantity on board the airplane, which resu
fatigue that resulted from inadequate quality assurance during the manufacturing process.
ctional control after encountering a tail rotor vortex ring state induced right yaw.
dequate en route fuel consumption calculations.
R navigation indicator, which subsequently led to his becoming lost and disoriented while navigating to an alternate airpor
mpt a go-around, then attempt to stop on the wet grass. Factors include variable winds, the pilot's inadequate compensation
wing out the fuel vent and near the exhaust of the left engine resulting in the on-ground fire and substantial damage to the
control and the flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the flight.
installation of the intake and exhaust push rods (components were switched) by unknown maintenance personnel.
eat, resulting in a loss of engine power, and, his misjudged autorotation approach that resulted in a collision with the groun
r wind conditions during the single-engine landing. Factors associated with this accident were the pilot's intentional shut d
l action (banking to realign the airplane with the runway). Factors were the student pilot flaring the airplane prematurely a
medial action on the student's right drift during the flare. Factors were the student not maintaining directional control, the
eat in a timely manner while maneuvering in conditions conducive to carburetor icing, resulting in the loss of engine power
nal and altitude control of the airplane during a ago-around maneuver, resulting in collision with a fence and utility pole.
ce with trees during an intentional low altitude flight maneuver.
Page 268
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
of the airplane during takeoff which resulted in an inadvertent stall. A factor in the accident was the pilot's inadequate com
during the landing rollout. The pilot's self induced pressure and the quartering tailwind were factors in the accident.
uate airspeed, which resulted in an inadvertent stall and spin.
rplane to stall. Factors were the missing alternator belt and the resultant total electrical system failure, and the pilot's att
l control during the takeoff portion of a touch and go landing.
er the student pilot lost control of the airplane. A factor in the accident was the CFI's lack of total experience in flight instru
e to undetermined reasons and the pilot's failure to maintain control of the airplane. Factors in this accident were; the pilo
for the existing crosswind condition and his failure to maintain runway alignment.
n visual conditions and class 'E' airspace. Contributing to the accident were the initial position report location and the app
nt altitude over, or clearance with, a barbed-wire fence. A factor was the fence.
directional control. A factor in this accident was the crosswind condition.
directional control during landing and the subsequent collision with a taxiway sign and collapsed right main landing gear.
ced landing by the pilot-in-command for his failure to apply power and inadvertent stall by the pilot-in-command resulting
ose gear retraction rod, which prevented the extension of the nose gear.
n directional control of the airplane during takeoff.
n visual conditions and class 'E' airspace. Contributing to the accident were the initial position report location and the app
ation and continued visual flight into instrument meteorological conditions. Factors were the pilot's improper remedial actio
intain directional control, resulting in an inadvertent ground loop. A factor was the crosswind.
of the other airplane. A factor relating to the accident was the airport control tower's local controller's failure to provide e
aps from the fully extended position following the last landing resulting in the failure to maintain airspeed and subsequent
nadequate altitude and airspeed available, resulting in a power demand that exceeded the capability of the aircraft. The f
uvering due to the oil pressure relief valve plug ball seat becoming contaminated with metal. Contributing factors were the
ce from the other airplane. Factors relating to the accident were the pilot's poor visual lookout, and the airport control tow
on calculation. Factors were the rough terrain, the fence and the exhaustion of the fuel supply.
anding site on a frozen, snow-covered lake. A factor associated with the accident was an area of drifted snow at the landin
trical short which initiated the landing gear retraction cycle when cabin heat was activated, resulting in the main landing g
directional control during landing. A factor in the accident was the ditch that ran parallel to the runway.
lot and fuel consumption calculations not being preformed by the pilot. Factors to the accident were fuel exhaustion, the r
ltitude and his failure to attain the proper touchdown point during landing. A factor was the utility pole.
ervision of a dual student who attempted a go around using one engine which resulted in loss of control and impact with th
n adverse weather after receiving hazardous weather advisories, which resulted in inadvertent flight into instrument meteo
n fuel exhaustion and a total loss of engine power. Factors were the low ceilings, mist, and the pilot's inability to fly the ILS
pilots of both airplanes.
and avoid the other airplane while operating in the traffic pattern, which resulted in a mid-air collision. A contributing facto
pilots of both airplanes.
d personnel had disconnected the loading hose from the hopper before takeoff, resulting in restricted directional control an
Page 269
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
rrectly install one or more of the crankshaft counterweight pin retaining plate snap rings, specifically ensuring that the sna
and avoid the other airplane while operating in the traffic pattern, which resulted in a mid-air collision. A contributing facto
llow ATC landing sequence clearance, which resulted in the PA-28's encounter with the helicopters wake turbulence. A fact
d. Inadequate remedial action was a factor.
n of the intake manifold from the #3 cylinder, as a result of improper maintenance.
of the helicopter during a practice autorotation, by allowing the rotor rpm to become inadequate to cushion the touchdown
checklists in the Owner's Handbook, resulting in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.
visual lookout while maneuvering in the traffic pattern.
ain for landing. Factors in the accident were soft, snow covered terrain.
leaking fuel tank system. Factors contributing to the accident were, inaccurate fuel quantity sensors, the lack of suitable
ay that was covered with ice and snow, without obtaining current wind information. Factors were the 20-knot tailwind and
conduct tuna spotting operations. This was to be the first flight of the day. After takeoff, about 100 to 150 feet above sea
w, which resulted in inadequate altitude to clear powerlines, and the subsequent in-flight collision with the ground.
lot. Factors were the pilot's intentional ground loop/swerve and the tail wind.
ning resulting in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.
er, which resulted in the helicopter rolling over.
al control of the aircraft. Factors were the icy runway and the snowbank.
at he turned into a tailwind which resulted in diminished airspeed. Factors associated with the accident were the tailwind,
nce from the rotating propeller.
nal control during the landing roll.
while maneuvering in proximity to wires. A contributing factor was the sun glare, which reduced the wire's conspicuity.
of the aircraft during a crosswind takeoff, which resulted in a collision with the terrain and a runway light.
aintained by the dual student and the remedial action not performed by the certified flight instructor. Contributing factors
directional control. Factors were the pilot's lack of total experience and the snowbank.
w pass and misjudged his altitude.
pensation for the wind conditions. A factor was the flight instructor's improper use of speed brakes and the strong gusty w
el starvation for und etermined reasons. This resulted in a forced landing to none suitable terrain, and a subsequent in-fligh
ent, his inaccurate fuel consumption calculations, and his improper use of the fuel selector.
g/preparation in that he initiated flight into known adverse weather, and continued VFR flight into IMC to the point where re
control during the missed approach. Factors to the accident were, the pilot's improper decision to attempt the approach in
by the pilot during the attempted go-around. Factors to the accident were the inadequate preflight by the pilot, which resu
axi area. A factor associated with the accident was the soft, snow-covered terrain.
lookout while repo sitioning the helicopter at a road side landing zone resulting in an in-flight (hover) collision with a tree.
t landing gear axle during taxi from landing for undetermined reasons.
1 cylinder exhaust valve.
control during landing. A factor was the crosswind condition.
of the aircraft during landing roll. Factors were the pilot's diverted attention to raising the flaps and the high wind conditio
ce with a fence during the aborted landing.
hat he did not periodically clear the engine during an extended glide. The factors were carburetor icing, weather condition
h airspeed in variance with the manufacturer's recommendations, which was too slow for the gusty and variable crosswind
proper flare, and recovery from a bounced landing not performed by the pilot. The crosswind was a contributing factor.
ngine by company maintenance personnel. The tree was a contributing factor.
that resulted in his operating an aircraft with contaminated fuel that resulted in a loss of engine power and a forced landin
rmined reasons on appr oach for landing resulting in an in-flight collision with a dirt bank, separation of the main landing ge
rols (cyclic and col lective) during a autorotation resulting in a hard landing and subsequent roll over.
trol of the airplane after a loss of engine power on one engine. Factors in the accident were the pilot/owner's failure to foll
mpt a flight on minimal fuel, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion. A factor was the closed fu
Page 270
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
e airplane within the design stress limits of the drive shaft assembly, that resulted in the failure of the Flex Coupling Reten
nal control while landing with a crosswind.
determined reasons to go into the locked position after the pilot conducted a manual and emergency gear extension. A fac
on prior to the ferry flight by the pilot/mechanic rated passenger who endorsed the airplane as airworthy, the shift in the nu
fuel, resulting in a power loss due to fuel exhaustion. A factor was a lack of suitable terrain on which to make a forced land
-flight decision to perform an abrupt low altitude pitch up maneuver (aerobatic flight). This resulted in the main rotor blade
nadequate remedial action was a factor.
mixture control to off, resulting in a total loss of engine power.
n flight that inhibited the pilot from maintaining altitude.
nal control during landing. A factor in this accident was the gusty crosswind conditions.
he proper visual glide path resulting in an undershoot and collision with the runway edge.
d blockage in the fuel line from the header tank to the gascolator. Factors relating to this accident were the blocked fuel l
te inspection of the fuel system that resulted in loss of engine power due to fuel filter contamination.
resulting in a wheels-up landing and post-crash fire.
ain for takeoff. Factors in the accident were soft, snow-covered terrain, and an inadvertent ground loop.
rmined reasons. Factors include unsuitable terrain for the forced landing attempt.
termined reasons.
rols during an emergency landing. Factors were an encounter with a loss of tail rotor effectiveness (LTE) during an out-of-g
d reasons.
el. Contributing factors were the pilot's failure to maintain adequate altitude and his diversion of attention during the base
e seat to move aft to a position where the pilot could no longer reach the controls.
maintain directional control of the aircraft during landing roll.
eat, which resulted in a loss of engine power. Factors included the ambient carburetor icing conditions and the lack of suita
er with the wheels of the amphibious float plane extended.
e flight and his failure to maintain clearance with the power lines.
dure prior to departure, which did not verify the fuel selector was in the proper position for flight, and the pilot's failure to
ontroller and the local controller to provide effective separation between the accident airplanes on the runway, resulting in
ontroller and the local controller to provide effective separation between the accident airplanes on the runway, resulting in
rplane which resulted in fuel exhaustion. Factors were the pilot's poor preflight planning, failure to lean the mixture in acc
dverse weather conditions which included icing and his inability to maintain aircraft control and a proper glidepath during
ensate for changing wind conditions during the landing roll in a tailwheel-equipped aircraft. Factors include a variable, shif
around after the airplane began to porpoise, resulting in a hard landing and structural damage to the airplane.
ng gear tire tread which resulted in damage to the right main landing gear mounting structure.
takeoff area which precluded his ability to remain in ground effect until entering translational lift and resulted in his failure
m fuel starvation due to the pilot's inadequate pre-flight inspection, inadequate performance of the pre-takeoff checklist, a
ot becoming lost/disoriented. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
e during landing and the subsequent loss of directional control due to restricted movement of the control stick. The contro
aintain clearance while flying at a low altitude.
anufacturer's recommended landing procedures for a contaminated runway by landing with a tailwind. Factors were the p
nder compression from an open exhaust valve, and the pilot's failure to lean the fuel mixture.
nt altitude over, or clearance with, a tree. Factors contributing to the occurrence of the accident were the tree and sharply
ce from power lines while maneuvering at a low altitude. A factor was glare from the sun.
nal control during the takeoff roll. A factor was the crosswind.
resulted in the partial loss of engine power during takeoff.
ailure of the cylinder. A factor was the plowed/furrowed terrain.
ermined reason, which resulted in a forced landing. A factor was the dark night light condition.
in a timely manner. Factors were the tailwind and high density altitude, resulting in inadequate climb performance.
n adequate visual lookout, resulting in both airplanes colliding in flight. Contributing to the accident were: 1) inadequate a
Page 271
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
n adequate visual lookout, resulting in both airplanes colliding in flight. Contributing to the accident were: 1) inadequate a
ltage surge.
d reasons. A factor was unsuitable terrain on which to make a forced landing.
ervision of the student pilot by allowing the student to fly in gusty wind conditions with excessive crosswinds that resulting
s failure to maintain clearance from the ground. A factor was the pilot's lack of recent experience.
s were dark night conditions, and the pilot's lack of recent experience in the type of operation (night landings).
nal control of the tailwheel equipped airplane.
ensate for wind conditions.
y person(s) undetermined. A factor was the inadequate supervision of the flight by the flight instructor.
clic control usage during an emergency descent, following the onset of a 1 to 1 vibration for undetermined reasons, resulti
ervision of the dual student resulting in the student pushing forward on the control stick during a bounced landing until the
to this accident were the pilot's inadvertent flight into known adverse weather conditions, the icing conditions, and improp
tern by the pilot of the Piper airplane and the inadequate lookout by the pilots in both airplanes. A factor in the accident w
or undetermined reason(s).
ectional control of the aircraft during the takeoff roll. A rough, uneven runway surface was a factor in the accident.
tern by the pilot of the Piper airplane and the inadequate lookout by the pilots in both airplanes. A factor in the accident w
envelope. A factor was the wind gust.
anding gear instead of the flaps during the landing roll.
for the gusty wind conditions. A factor was the windshear encountered on final approach.
te the airplane with known deficiencies. A factor in this accident was the inability of the engine to attain full power for und
while performing aerial application resulting in the aircraft colliding with a piece of farm equipment which was parked in the
anding gear was lowered before touchdown.
tor mast while in cruise flight following a mast bumping event. The reason for the mast bumping event was not determine
attempted go-around. A factor associated with the accident was the pilot's failure to maintain proper runway alignment.
ue to fuel starvation which was caused by a fuel leak in the gascolator as a result of improper maintenance by the operato
of the aircraft while making a forced landing following loss of engine power for undetermined reasons, resulting in the aircr
to properly install and connect the aileron control rod. Factors were the inadequate annual inspection by maintenance per
ensate for wind conditions and subsequent loss of control.
Factors include mountainous/hilly terrain.
nal control after touchdown and the subsequent wing tip strike, ground loop, and runway excursion.
eparation resulting in refueling not being performed and the subsequent fuel exhaustion and forced landing into trees. A fa
e control cable, which prevented the pilot from restarting the engine. Contributing factors were the pilot's failure to follow p
of the airplane which resulted in an inadvertent stall. A factor in the accident was the pilot's use of excessive nose-down e
ng disengaged and the inadvertent use of the fuel supply during flight.
undetermined reasons.
during landing roll-out. A factor was the pilot's lack of total experience.
vering as a result of the separation of the exhaust rocker arm retaining stud due to fatigue, which resulted in a precaution
ing in loss of engine power due to water and rust contamination of the fuel. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the
nal control, resulting in an inadvertent ground loop/swerve. Factors were a burnt and unseated intake valve, and the tail w
ting in oil exhaustion and subsequent engine seizure. Factors were the poor fitting installation by the pilot, and unsuitable
ng resulting in fuel exhaustion.
aintain clearance from N9570E. A factor associated with the accident was the pilot of N51933's restricted forward visibilit
ation, and his improper remedial actions that led to a precautionary landing and subsequent attempted takeoff from unsuit
ermined reason.
rplane to porpoise after landing hard, and inadvertently stalling the airplane after aborting the landing attempt. Factors w
control and the subsequent inadvertent stall/spin. A factor was the pilot's diverted attention to over flying her residence.
Page 272
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
aintain clearance from N9570E. A factor associated with the accident was the pilot of N51933's restricted forward visibilit
er use of the mixture control while demonstrating a simulated loss of engine power which resulted in fuel starvation. A fac
ailure to attain clearance with the trees during the aborted landing. Factors associated with the accident were the pilot's fa
nsation for wind conditions and the flight instructor's delay in remedial action. A factor in the accident was the gusting wind
alignment during takeoff. A factor in the accident was wind gusts.
for the crosswind. A factor in this accident was the gusty crosswind condition.
o undetermined reasons.
ommand while on final approach resulting in the uncontrolled descent and in-flight collision with water.
ntation while reversing course during a dark night while over water which resul;ted in an in-flight collision with water. A fac
ractical and to utilize the available accumulator pressure to transition from hover to flight. Contributing to the accident wa
tion of the landing area, which resulted in the separation of the main rotor system as a result of foreign object damage.
n to continue a visual approach in instrument meteorological conditions which resulted in his failure to maintain terrain cle
action in a timely manner which resulted in a hard landing during the practice autorotation. A factor in this accident was th
uvering for undetermined reasons resulting in an in-flight collision with terrain. A factor in the accident was the in-flight los
for undetermined reasons.
aircraft control. A factor in the accident was the pilot's inexperience in rotorcraft.
n undetermined reason.
g for an undetermined reason which resulted in the pilot's inability to maintain directional control of the airplane.
control during landing. Contributing factors were the crosswind condition, gusts, and the pilot's overall lack of total (flight
on, and subsequent improper decision to fly into forecast and known icing conditions that exceeded the capability of the ai
arance between the left wingtip and a hangar door resulting in the on-ground collision.
in the minimum controllable airspeed during a simulated emergency approach, which resulted in a stall.
amination. Factors, were the trees, and the weather conditions were conducive to carburetor icing.
arance during a spray pass resulting in the in-flight collision with the raised rows of the field.
proper touchdown point and the CFI's delay in remedial action.
eject the takeoff and his failure to retract the landing gear following liftoff were factors.
control during a simulated loss of engine power emergency. A factor associated with the accident was the rough terrain on
ch jammed the control stick. Factors associated with the accident were the low altitude at which the control stick jammed
brake and subsequent lodging of brake lining debris between the brake housing and brake disc, resulting in seizure of the r
during landing roll. A factor was the crosswind.
undetermined. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
d maximum gross weight was exceeded by the pilot in command.
for winds. Factors include gusty, shifting winds, crosswinds, and an earthen berm near the edge of the runway.
uate visual lookout, due to his distraction with a flock of birds. A factor was the pilot's improper in flight decision to contin
on, resulting in a tailwind departure.
due to lack of lubrication, the oil flow being restricted by a foreign object (epoxy hardener). Factors were trees and the un
er alignment not attained by the pilot. Contributing factors were the unmarked golf cart, color, and lack of a radio. Additio
g from its threaded receptacle at the forward end of the engine crankshaft. This resulted in excessive oil within the clutch
nway alignment during the initial climb from the grass airstrip. Also, the excessive pull-up by the pilot and inadvertent stal
while on the base to final turn for landing subsequently striking the wing tip on the runway.
plane. A factor was the pilot's diverted attention toward people on the ground.
adverse weather and his failure to maintain obstacle clearance. Contributing factors were adverse weather conditions, an
nadequate silicone material the builder used, and the rough and uneven terrain. A factor was that suitable landing terrain
the trees. Factors were the trees and the ravine terrain condition.
ure of the number four cylinder's exhaust valve spring and exhaust valve. Contributing to the accident were, the barbwire f
anding area. Factors associated with the accident were the pilot's disorientation, landing at the wrong airport, flat lighting
tion for torque, which resulted in a loss of directional control of the airplane.
Page 273
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ane into known adverse weather conditions resulting in the pilot's loss of control of the aircraft. Contributing factors were
unway alignment upon encountering a wind gust, and his subsequent failure or inability to maintain clearance with a tree
nal control. Factors include a drainage ditch and a crosswind.
climb for undetermined reasons resulting in an attempted emergency landing to unsuitable terrain and collision with a tree
ned reasons. Factors were the lack of suitable terrain for a forced landing and the rough/uneven terrain on which the airpla
of the airplane while on final approach resulting in the airplane striking trees. Factors in this accident were: improper plann
failure to maintain the aircraft's clearance with trees.
ng. A contributing factor was the loss of engine power for an undetermined reason.
touchdown point. A factor was a tailwind.
on of the secondary shaft which resulted in its fatigue failure that emanated from a corroded circumferential score mark.
ectional control of the airplane during landing in gusting crosswind conditions.
que sensor gear assembly resulting in a loss of engine power. A factor was the muddy terrain encountered during the forc
ystem due to non-standard repairs, improper modifications, and corrosion.
fuel selector which resulted in fuel starvation. Factors were the pilot's lack of familiarity with the fuel system due to an in
collision with airport markings due to inadequate compensation for wind conditions during landing roll. Factors were inacc
or the wind condition. A factor to the accident was the high winds.
veloped into a complete separation of the blade.
re-takeoff checklists (resulting in the engine starters remaining engaged after engine start, generators not being activated
rocker arm failure and soft/unsuitable terrain during the subsequent forced landing.
mined reasons. A factor was the operation within the cross "hatched area" of the helicopter's height/velocity curve by the c
countered. A factor was the wind gusts.
ce from objects during the final approach. A factor was downdraft on final approach.
aerobatic maneuvers that resulted in the aircraft stalling and entering a spin from which he did not recover. A factor in th
ight main landing gear wheel as a result of fatigue.
r operating until the balloon was secured. A factor was the passengers disregarding the instructions they had been given b
wheel stinger housing and longitudinal cross tube, resulting in separation of the tube/tail wheel assembly from the airframe
high, steep, and fast approach, which resulted in a touchdown beyond the halfway point of the runway and the inability to
pensate for a crosswind condition, resulting in a loss of directional control and collision with a rock.
nment with the landing runway, and her failure to maintain proper glide path for the landing runway, resulting in an encou
plane while turning final.
during landing rollout when the forward attach bolt sheared for undetermined reasons. This resulted in the aircraft's rudde
ounced landing resulting in a loss of directional control and collision with a fence.
control on takeoff that resulted in a collision with a taxiway surface.
te airspeed while in the traffic pattern, which resulted in an inadvertent stall/spin. Contributing factor was the pilot's divert
n icing conditions which resulted in an inadvertent stall/mush and hard landing. A factor in the accident was the icing cond
glidepath. A factor was the dark night light conditions.
r decisions when to use carburetor heat and to perform a soft field landing. Factors relating to this accident were the impr
erating procedures by not raising the flaps during the go-around maneuver. Contributing factors were the pilot's failure to a
e to allow recovery. Factors in this accident were fog and low ceilings.
ain aircraft control during takeoff initial climb.
which resulted in the airplane porpoising on the runway during the landing.
ain for landing. Factors in the accident were snow-covered terrain, and a short runway/landing area.
adequate evaluation of the weather, and failure to maintain an adequate altitude above the ground. Factors in the acciden
by the pilot. Factors include excessive speed at touchdown, a wet runway, a fence, and the pilot's inadvertent flight into IM
Page 274
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ne in instrument meteorological conditions, which resulted in an inadvertent stall/spin. Factors included the pilot's lack of
mined reasons during takeoff climb.
ectional control during the landing roll. A factor was the pilot's total lack of experience in tailwheel airplanes.
he transmission case and the pylon mounted actuator support assembly which resulted in fatigue failure of the threaded st
anding area. Factors associated with the accident were an open service door, and snow-covered terrain.
des due to a fatigue failure of one blade. Factors were sloping and rough uneven terrain for the ensuing forced landing.
directional control of the airplane during the landing. Factors associated with the accident were the misjudged landing flar
el brakes. A factor associated with this accident was the pilot's lack of experience in the make and model of airplane.
crosswind and to maintain directional control during landing.
n oil cooler line.
o re-torque the engine driven fuel pump in accordance with an Airworthiness Directive that resulted in a fuel leak and a su
the pilot which did not detect the water in the fuel tanks prior to departure.
r wind conditions during approach to landing resulting in the aircraft touching down hard, short of the runway, and receivin
ilure to secure an attachment nut to a control link. While maneuvering, the parts separated and resulted in the total cyclic
ue to the student pilot becoming disoriented and lost.
roper airspeed during landing, which resulted in a hard landing and subsequent porpoise down the runway.
ned reasons.
nsation for wind conditions. A factor was the downdraft wind condition.
ned reasons.
not to refuel which resulted in fuel exhaustion and a total loss of engine power.
ensate for wind conditions upon encountering a wind shift on takeoff. A factor was variable winds.
e preflight planning/preparation. Not attaining a proper climb rate, not maintaining a proper runway alignment, and gustin
on, which resulted in a loss of aircraft control. Factors in this accident were icing conditions, and aircraft loading which exc
ower for undetermined reasons.
clearance while cruising up a mountain pass, on a dark night, in IMC conditions, and his improper in-flight decision to perfo
ot. A factor was the crosswind.
l of the aircraft during landing roll. Factors were a dust devil/whirlwind and the pilot's lack of landing currency.
nal control of the glider after its wing came in contact with long grass growing on the runway surface. Factors include the p
ue flight into IMC conditions, and his failure to maintain control of the airplane. Factors related to the accident were the fai
Page 275
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
of the airplane.
ation of the left wing due to the manufacturer's underestimation during the aircraft design process of the time interval from
by the pilot. Factors to the accident were the encountered dynamic rollover and the uneven terrain.
ck exhaust valve that resulted in the collision with a tree while maneuvering for the forced landing.
nsumption calculation that resulted in the total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion and the subsequent collision wi
for the gusty wind conditions. A factor associated with the accident was the wind gusts.
e, which resulted in a loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion. Unsuitable terrain for a landing was a contributing facto
bounced landing. A factor in the accident was the pilot's decision to operate the airplane over the maximum gross weight
ontrol. Factors were the gusts and the fence.
n an area of high rising mountainous terrain at an inadequate altitude, which resulted in an impact during a turn to reverse
the autorotation performed by the pilot. The unfavorable wind was a contributing factor.
he water that remained in the fuel system after the preflight.
mined reasons.
ce that resulted in the in-flight collision with a tower.
maintain control of the helicopter, resulting in skid contact with an obstacle and dynamic roll over.
ing in the loss of the oil cap and subsequent loss of engine oil. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the landing.
ntrol due to spatial disorientation. Factors relating to the accident were the dark night, clouds, and rain.
mpensate for the crosswind and maintain flying speed during takeoff.
mined reasons resulting in the airplane colliding with mountainous terrain during the uncontrolled descent.
for the existing crosswind condition, and his improper positioning of the flight controls.
nal control of the aircraft. A factor in the accident was the uneven runway surface.
ar at low altitude, which resulted in a loss of control and a stall/spin. Factors in the accident were the high density altitude
of the airplane during a go-around in a crosswind condition.
nal control of the airplane during the takeoff roll. A factor was the runway sign struck by the aircraft.
of the aircraft after initiating a go-around following a hard bounced landing. Factors were variable shifting winds and a high
ain for landing. A factor in the accident was a soft area of runway.
ce from the terrain. Factors include low ceilings, snow, rain, and rising, mountainous/hilly terrain.
Page 276
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ouchdown point.
nue to a point where he could not be assured of reaching a safe landing-out site if he encountered an area of significant sin
ed in a partial power loss.
mproper application of power and rudder, in order to arrest a swerve during the landing roll.
rate, while turning to land on the rooftop helipad, which resulted in a collision with the building. Factors in the accident we
e aircraft's altitude and subsequent maneuver to avoid an obstacle, that resulted in a loss of airspeed, an inadvertent stall,
uate lookout resulting in a collision with a transmission wire that resulted in a forced landing and substantial damage to th
and decision to hover out of ground effect which resulted in a loss of tail rotor effectiveness.
of the helicopter while maneuvering. A factor was the high density altitude weather conditions.
nal control during the aborted takeoff, which resulted in an inadvertent groundloop.
sult of the failure of an exhaust valve. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
h resulted in exceeded the proper touchdown point on the runway. A factor associated with the accident was the ditch tha
ow fitting within the tank during previous maintenance. The improper alignment resulted in the fuel pick-up tube being mis
of the glider. A factor related to the accident was the pilot's lack of experience in make and model.
ors and differential mechanism assembly by unknown person(s), which resulting in what the pilot describes as inflight flutte
onal control.
roper glidepath, which resulted in a collision with a power pole and damage to the landing gear.
for a crosswind and his failure to maintain directional control during landing, resulting in the airplane veering off the runwa
ce with the antenna tower. A factor was the smoke weather condition.
ern altitude that resulted in an off-field landing and the subsequent collision with the ground. A factor was rough terrain.
etermined reason. A factor in the accident was unsuitable terrain for a forced landing.
management and the check pilot to ensure the landing area was suitable for the slide on landing. Factors were the high ve
strument meteorological conditions. Factors were the mountain obscuration and the rising terrain.
ndetermined reasons.
e as required by the airplane's published flight manual resulting in a loss of engine power due to fuel starvation.
Page 277
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
s, on the underside of the right wing, while the airplane was climbing, due to improper balance between the two flying wire
nal control while landing. Factors in this accident were the tailwind condition, and the pilot's lack of flight experience in tai
ment of the fuel selector to the "off" positon when selecting the alternate tank, and the flight instructor's lack of verification
ervision of the student pilot during the landing.
he pilot. Factors were: The passenger door opening, the pilot's inexperience in make and model, and rough, uneven terra
A factor was the soft grass airstrip.
reasons and the foreign object damage due to the door impact to the tailboom and tail rotor drive system.
axi area, and excessive taxi speed. A factor associated with this accident was a ditch in the taxi area.
mined reasons that resulted in a forced landing and substantial damage to the aircraft.
ris (aluminum) from an undetermined source found in the engine-driven fuel pump cavity resulting in the shearing of the h
t during a cross country flight resulting in a loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion, and his failure to achieve the prop
nal control during an attempted go-around, resulting in a loss of directional control, and subsequent collapse of the left ma
obstruction (insect larva) of the left wing aft fuel system line resulting in a forced landing to non suitable terrain.
mined reasons, and the pilot's failure to maintain airspeed resulting in an inadvertent stall and subsequent collision with ter
mined reasons and the unsuitable terrain for landing encountered by the pilot. A factor to the accident was the hilly terrain
nal control of the airplane during the landing. Factors associated with the accident were the crosswind, along with the runw
the fuel selector to a tank with fuel resulting in fuel starvation, a loss of engine power, and subsequent collision with the g
for a crosswind condition during initial takeoff climb, which resulted a failure to maintain alignment and the airplane driftin
esulted in the fuel strainer valve being left in the open position.
control, and the subsequent inadvertent stall/spin. Contributing factors were the loss of engine power on both engines for
ssor and turbine sections of the engine, which resulted in a loss of power.
ft control after a loss of consciosness.
ned reasons.
t which resulted in the loss of power, and his improper flare during the forced landing, which resulted in a hard landing. Fa
ut by the pilot-in-command while reducing throttle control resulting in the airplane nose-over.
ectional control after takeoff resulting in the uncontrolled descent and impact on a closed runway.
d reasons.
eld landing technique while attempting a forced landing to an open field following a loss of engine power which resulted in
of the number 3 cylinder that resulted in a total loss of engine power during an aerial application flight.
for the crosswind condition and his subsequent failure to maintain directional control during landing.
dial action when he realized a low fuel state. Factors were fuel exhaustion and low airspeed.
rol of the aircraft while in the simulated engine inoperative configuration in the landing pattern during a checkout flight re
rrain. Factors were improper wiring of the electric fuel boost pump, which produce high pressure when either on position w
and his failure to maintain directional control of the airplane during landing. A factor in the accident was the pilot's excessi
for wind conditions during takeoff. A factor in the accident was a sudden wind shift.
mpt to close the canopy (entry door) after it inadvertently opened in flight, instead of making a precautionary landing with i
control subsequent to the aircraft's canopy opening in flight. Factors include the pilot's failure confirm that the aircraft's c
pressure line fitting, which resulted in a loss of oil and an oil starvation failure of the engine.
e from the trees. Factors relating to this accident were the low altitude and the trees.
ng/decision to attempt to make it back to the runway for landing after experiencing a loss of lift and not maintaining a prop
uring landing rollout due to the pilot's foot becoming wedged under a rudder pedal, which restricted its movement.
Page 278
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
the right wing attachment fitting, which resulted in the right wing separating in flight.
maintain clearance with the ground during an aerial application.
ntain directional control on the takeoff roll. Factors to the accident were the lack of experience of the student pilot and the
of the helicopter.
errain while descending for undetermined reasons.
m improper handling of a pesticide.
cessary for the go-around and not maintaining clearance from terrain. Factors were the crosswind, gust, and the collapsed
ensure their aircraft's jet blast was not a hazard to the Cessna. A factor for the Cessna was the B-767 moving on the taxiw
control. Factors were gusty winds, and the pilot's lack of experience in the make and model accident glider.
uce adequate power for undetermined reasons, and the pilot's continued operation of the airplane with known deficiencies.
lade tip weight resulting in tail rotor assembly imbalance and separation due to the installation of an unapproved rotor bla
rotation airspeed during initial takeoff and his improper aborted takeoff procedures.
kage of a hydraulic line which resulted in the total loss of hydraulic fluid and the inability of the pilot to extend the landing
onnecting rod, due to a primer leak initiation of a partial hydraulic lock. A factor in the accident was the unsuitable terrain
ding until the approaching line of thunderstorms passed, causing the flight to encounter severely gusting wind conditions re
isual lookout.
control during landing roll. A factor was gusting winds from nearby thunderstorms.
for wind conditions during landing. A factor in this accident was the tailwind.
nal control during landing. A factor in this accident was the crosswind condition.
terrain for landing. A factor in the accident was the soft terrain.
per glide path on final approach to insure arrival at the proper runway touchdown point. A factor in the accident is the pilot
tor in this accident was high wind conditions.
nd takeoff and his failure to attain flying speed.
aircraft control after takeoff.
recast, and his VFR flight into IMC. Contributing factors were snow showers, fog, and the mountainous terrain.
t control. Factors to the accident were the uneven terrain, the failure of the pilot to maintain directional control on the gro
nditions and the altitude/clearance not maintained by the pilot. An additional cause was the improper in-flight planning/dec
nal control of the gyroplane during takeoff roll, resulting in a roll over.
the wingman to maintain proper clearance between his aircraft and the lead aircraft while conducting formation aerobatic
y the pilot-in-command during the forced landing and the loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
dent pilot by the CFI for his failure to note that the student was performing a go-around from a low pass with 30-degree of
ilot-in-command in an over gross weight condition, the failure of the pilot to maintain airspeed (Vs) after takeoff, and the in
uel selector position after experiencing surging of the engine. Contributing to the accident was the partial loss of engine p
the wingman to maintain proper clearance between his aircraft and the lead aircraft while conducting formation aerobatic
al action, and his failure to correct an inappropriate descent during maneuvering flight, while engaged in commercial flight
which resulted in fuel starvation.
nal control during the takeoff. A factor was the fence struck by the aircraft.
e separation of the magneto ground lead and the rough and unsuitable terrain during the forced landing.
ce from the rising terrain. Factors include his poor decision to depart without assurance that he could clear the surrounding
ontamination in the fuel system and the pilot's inadequate preflight inspection, which failed to detect the water. The pilot'
nal control during the landing roll. A factor was the pilot's lack of experience in the make and model of the accident aircra
resulted in a partial loss of engine power. Factors were the fouled number 3, 4, and 5 rear spark plugs and the lack of suit
ain for the precautionary landing. Wet and soft terrain, and the pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the aircraft
Page 279
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
by not immediately seeking a safe landing site upon encountering the sink. A factor was the high vegetation (sagebrush).
ouchdown point.
own point during the landing. Factors associated with the accident were the fence and the ditch which the airplane contac
plug by the airplane owner/mechanic which resulted in a loss of engine oil and forced landing.
ntain airspeed following total loss of engine power resulting in an inadvertent stall and subsequent uncontrolled descent. A
speed during the takeoff initial climb, which resulted in a stall.
esulting in the loss of engine power. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
of the airplane, which resulted in an inadvertent stall/mush.
flight instructor by allowing the student to fly into a hazardous situation. Factors were the flight instructor delaying extend
ensure adequate airspeed for flight during a forced descent due to airframe icing, resulting in a stall. Factors included: fr
maneuvering, which was the result of the pilot not allowing adequate altitude to clear the trees before starting a turn.
directional control during takeoff and his subsequent failure to relinquish control of the airplane.
e airspeed while attempting to land in gusty wind conditions leading to an inadvertent stall/mush, which resulted in a porp
r to maintain sufficient airspeed to prevent the aircraft stalling and spinning. Factors in the accident were terrain induced
und and his inadequate recovery from a bounced landing. Factors in the accident were the pilot's s failure to maintain the
nging pump resulting in the total failure of the engine, and the pilot's failure to compensate for wind conditions that led him
ensate for wind conditions. Factors include a tailwind.
Page 280
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
n a safe rate of descent during approach to landing. Contributing factors were the pilot's incorrect altimeter (Kollsman) se
ermined reason.
n-command) inadequate supervision of his dual student, who prematurely retracted the landing gear.
gearbox's 1st stage sungear, which resulted in its subsequent fatigue fracture and failure. Factors were the operator not pe
nal control during the landing roll, which resulted in an inadvertent ground loop.
or unknown reason.
nal control of the airplane during the landing roll. A factor was the muddy terrain condition.
rod, piston, and cylinder. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
by the pilot. Factors to the accident were the turbulent weather condition, the inadvertent stall, and the inadequate weath
capability of the airplane during takeoff. A factor was the trees.
er's hovering capabilities in a downwind hover. Factors included tailwind conditions, the pilot's lack of experience in the ty
nadequate remedial action and diverted attention were factors.
anding gear of the amphibian airplane for a water landing.
for wind. The crosswind was a contributing factor.
mnants of fuel tank sealant that had accumulated in the fuel selector screen. Contributing to the pilot's inability to restart
which resulted in fuel starvation and a loss of power to both engines. A factor was the pilot's inadequate pre-flight planni
n, which resulted in fuel starvation. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
r the existing crosswind condition. A factor was the crosswind.
around resulting from the failure of the worn carburetor heat control cable. A contributing factor was the lack of suitable te
easons and the pilot's unsuccessful remedial action (dive to avoid the power line). Contributing factors were the power line
relating to this accident were the rough, uneven runway, and the trees.
itable terrain for landing encountered by the pilot-in-command. Factors to the accident were the fracture of the crankshaf
to maintain airspeed during climbout.
rrect approach airspeed (Vref) on final due to incorrect airspeed indications resulting from a partial blockage of the pitot lin
by the failure of the fuel transfer pump.
n, resulting in total failure of the reduction gear assembly accessory drive shaft.
ned reasons.
ectional control in that he failed to properly position the ailerons during his landing roll. Gusty, crosswind conditions, from
pilot not to land at the nearest airport at the first loss of engine power. Factors to the accident were fuel exhaustion, the e
rburetor icing conditions. A factor was the mountainous, unsuitable terrain on which to make a forced landing.
e fuel tank selector, and fuel starvation. A factor in the accident was the improper service of the airplane's hydraulic brake
ar while maneuvering at low altitude in mountainous terrain, which resulted in a high descent rate and inadvertent entry in
ce with the trees. Factors were a high-density altitude and wind gusts.
control when the airplane encountered high winds. Factors which related to this accident were the high crosswind, the win
being obtained/maintained by the pilot during the initial climb after takeoff. Factors to the accident were the inadequate pr
d during final approach to landing, resulting in an inadvertent stall.
reign object damage to the turbine wheel assembly.
for wind conditions. Factors associated with the accident were a crosswind, and an inadvertent ground loop/swerve.
nal control during the take-off run. Factors associated with the accident were rough/uneven, soft terrain.
and and the pilot receiving instruction to maintain directional control. Factors were the pilot receiving instruction allowing
of the airplane while taxiing. Factors related to the accident were the gusting wind conditions and the pilot's improper wea
is proper touchdown point. Factors were the downdraft and rising terrain leading to the runway.
of the airplane. A factor in the accident was the pilot's failure to properly brief/communicate transfer of the flight controls t
and and the pilot receiving instruction to maintain directional control. Factors were the pilot receiving instruction allowing
of the aircraft. A factor was gusty wind conditions.
ps during the aborted landing and was not able to gain enough altitude to clear a fence post at the end of the airstrip. Fac
pilot to fly past the Vandalia airport onto Saint Louis Regional and the fuel exhaustion. A factor was the ditch.
d, which resulted in an inadvertent stall.
he manual gear extension not performed by the pilot. The electrical system failure was a contributing factor.
on calculations, his misjudged in-flight planning, and his failure to flare during the landing attempt. A factor was the pilot's
Page 281
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
etermined. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
e with the external load that was setting on the ground while hovering. A contributing factor was the pilot's diverted atten
equate recovery from a bounced landing.
vorable weather conditions without first calculating takeoff performance data. Factors include gusty winds, downdrafts, terr
control. Inadequate altitude for recovery was a factor.
opter was on level terrain after landing. The left skid came off the ground after the passenger exited the helicopter, the slo
plane. A factor was his failure to maintain sufficient airspeed.
ding gear leg at the main landing gear axle attachment bolt holes.
nitial takeoff climb, at too low an altitude to afford remedial action, because of an ingested valve, and the airplane's subseq
ing procedure and his delayed decision to proceed to an alternate destination, which resulted in fuel exhaustion and a sub
on by other maintenance personnel of the exhaust system that resulted in an eroded muffler that allowed hot gases to imp
mined reasons. A factor was the weather conditions were favorable for the formation of carburetor ice. Contributing to the s
n adverse weather. A factor associated with the accident were low clouds.
pilot of the other airplane, and the inadequate radio traffic advisories by the pilots of both airplanes.
d and his failure to maintain clearance from the trees. Related factors were trees and mountainous terrain.
te airspeed through an area of turbulence, resulting in entry into a stall/mush condition. Factors included tailwind conditio
Page 282
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 283
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
nd the inadequate preflight planning and preparation by the pilot. Factors to the accident were the fuel exhaustion and th
ton, resulting in a total loss of engine power. Factors included the aircraft windshield being covered with oil (restricting for
e fuel lines of air after a fuel tank was run dry on the previous flight and the failure of the electric fuel boost pump on or low
aircraft control upon encountering variable winds during the landing flare/touchdown and his failure to recover from the re
ontrol after suffering a stroke in flight.
ane for landing, resulting in a hard landing, followed by an inadvertent pilot-induced porpoise and loss of directional contro
ar assembly. Factors were the low altitude when the failure occurred and the crops.
ation while maneuvering. A factor was that the fatigue was not detected by the mechanic during the last annual inspection
own deficiencies in equipment (an inoperable rear engine) and an inadvertent stall. Factors associated with the accident w
ate a timely go-around.
directional control during the landing roll.
ion that resulted in the fuel line being snagged, resulting in fuel starvation and an inflight loss of engine power and subseq
parture resulting in loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.
quate airspeed margin resulting in a stall and hard landing.
unced landing.
fter encountering a dust devil/whirlwind.
nsation for winds that resulted in his failure to maintain runway alignment and a hard landing.
te rotor RPM and failure to follow published recovery procedures after the low rotor RPM warning horn and caution light act
er spinner. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the precautionary landing.
ng and his delay in aborting the takeoff.
unavailable brakes to the pilot. Factors were the parked airplane and the fence.
te recovery from the bounced landing performed by the student pilot.
al approach and altitude/clearance from the fence post not being maintained by the pilot. A factor to the accident was the
low attitude at the time of the stall was a contributing factor.
ard landing. Factors include dark night environmental conditions and lack of recent experience for night landings.
proper sealant application) by an unknown person, and subsequent fracture of the spur adapter gearshaft resulting in a tot
ked off the bolt. An improper maintenance installation was a factor.
s rate of descent and his failure to initiate his level off soon enough to keep the helicopter from impacting the terrain. Fact
ain an airspeed above the aircraft's stall speed, which resulted in a stall/mush, and an inflight loss of control while maneuve
ve at an altitude too low to maintain clearance from trees.
ted in a hard landing.
Page 284
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
rrect runway for takeoff. Factors to the accident were the inadequate preflight planning/preparation, the aborted takeoff n
tricted by the pilot's seat-type parachute and the excessive descent rate and airspeed during landing. A factor to the accid
failed resulting in a total loss of engine power. The pilot made a forced landing on a road and the airplane's wing collided
ce with the power line. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
ntain control of the aircraft, the inadequate supervision by the flight instructor, and the delayed remedial action performed
touchdown point for landing, and his failure to go around from the improperly executed approach. Factors included the pi
ear strut housing.
nduced an overload failure on the left side landing gear bolts. Factors were the corrosion on the bolts, and the failure of th
nal control of the airplane during landing flare into a crosswind, resulting in a runway excursion off the runway edge and co
supervise the student, resulting in a loss of directional control.
directional control of the airplane during landing.
on to maintain directional control. Factors were a gusty crosswind, inadequate supervision by the flight instructor, and the
of the aircraft and his continued flight into adverse weather. Factors were the fog, and the crops.
anding area. Factors associated with the accident were a fuel drum, and a tailwind.
/clearance and delayed power application while attempting to release a banner from the airplane.
ff/initial climb due to undetermined reasons.
nnecting the inter-cooler to the engine due to inadequate attachment of the inter-cooler to the aircraft which resulted in lo
nal control during the landing roll resulting in a collision with terrain.
blew out of the helicopter because the left passenger door was not properly secured prior to takeoff. A contributing factor
ring and the separation of the aileron. A factor was the inadequate design change by the aircraft designer.
mpted VFR flight in instrument meteorological conditions. Contributing factors were mountainous terrain and cloud, low ce
ountainous/hilly terrain.
the takeoff. A factor in this accident was the dark night conditions.
flight instructor. Factors were the failure of the private pilot to maintain directional control, his failure to use the brakes, an
rom a bounced landing and her failure to perform a go-around.
quately compensate for a crosswind condition and maintain directional control during the landing roll, resulting in the airpl
a sudden wind shift resulting in a loss of directional control and collision with high vegetation.
he crosswind. A factor was the crosswind.
off for undetermined reasons.
touchdown point, and his failure to perform a go-around.
n calculations and exhaustion of his fuel supply.
ulted in a hard landing. A contributing factor was the pilot's lack of total experience in the make and model of airplane.
ion gear to the propeller. A contributing factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
arance with the deer stand. Factors were the chemical covering the windshield and the glare from the setting sun.
e improperly positioned fuel selector.
e flight instructor due to the inadequate maintenance adjustment of the tail wheel steering system by maintenance person
ere high density altitude, weight and balance exceeded, and pilot fatigue.
up a valley with rapidly rising terrain, which resulted in the airplane colliding with the terrain due to its climb performance
neuver at a low altitude and the pilot not maintaining clearance from the terrain. A factor to the accident was the pilot disr
ed reason(s).
e prior to fuel exhaustion. A factor associated with the accident was rough/uneven terrain.
sion to takeoff uphill, on a short runway with 50-foot high utility wires at the end, at a high gross weight. Factors were the
ulted in an off airport landing.
during initial climb that resulted in the aircraft colliding with the ground and incurring damage. A factor in the accident was
the pilot's inaccurate fuel consumption calculations, which resulted in fuel exhaustion.
ed by the pilot during landing rollout.
ot attaining proper runway alignment during the forced landing. Factors were the low altitude at which the engine failure
Page 285
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ontrol cable Nicopress sleeve by the owner/builder. The rudder control cable disconnection and the slipped cable from the
of the No. 4 cylinder connecting rod during the first flight following engine overhaul for undetermined reasons. Contributing
e normal brake system, and failure to follow published aircraft procedures/directives for a hard brake or no braking conditio
dequate fuel supply was on board at last departure, which resulted in a loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion. The p
ntain aircraft directional control.
e with the power lines. A factor associated with the accident was the power line.
ing rod bearing and the unsuitable terrain for landing encountered by the pilot during the forced landing. A factor to the a
d personnel, and the pilot's failure to visually detect a vehicle on the airstrip in time to avoid a collision. Factors included a
rotor system as a result of the malfunction of the free-wheeling sprag clutch assembly, followed by the torsional overload
hed go-around procedure. Factors were the pilot's improper evaluation of the wind conditions, and a tailwind.
of the airplane while taking off.
ight decision to maneuver at a low airspeed with a left-quartering tailwind which resulted in a loss of tailrotor effectiveness
the failure of an exhaust valve during an aerial application flight.
ial takeoff climb.
ce from a tree while making a low pass over an outdoor gathering of individuals. Factors include the intentional low pass, a
t with obstacles ahead which exceeded the climb capability of the airplane. Factors were the grass runway, and trees at th
y the pilot while descending for a forced landing. Contributing to the accident was the partial loss of engine power due a b
ng gear, and his failure to follow the published before landing checklist concerning extension of the landing gear.
that precluded proper engagement of the internal mechanism to fully select a port, and left it in an intermediate position,
ual-magneto single-drive unit. A factor contributing to the accident was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
mined reasons. Contributing factors were the pilot flying the airplane with known deficiencies, and the lack of suitable terra
aration of a connecting rod from the crankshaft.
ermined reason. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
ermined reason during maneuvering. Contributing factors were the dark night light conditions and the lack of suitable terr
d landing. A factor was a complete loss of power due to mechanical failure.
s to the accident were the failure of the pilot to maintain flying speed and the subsequent stall.
ed by the pilot during landing.
t was unsuitable for landing. A factor was the soft field.
ding and control of the balloon during landing not possible by the pilot.
applying normal brakes during the landing roll. Factors relating to this accident were the precautionary landing, and the p
ectional control of the aircraft. A factor to the accident was the pocket gopher mound in the wheat field.
ntrol while maneuvering the aircraft due to impairment as a result of use of illegal drugs, and the subsequent collision with
e and his improper fuel consumption calculations.
by the pilot under instruction, and the flight instructor's lack of remedial action.
needle bearing, which caused the engine to develop less than full rated power and the airplane to achieve less than expe
arance with the terrain.
arance from the power line. Factors were the sunglare and the wire.
recovery. A factor was the pilot's lack of total flight experience.
r decent rate. A factor was the up-sloping runway.
touchdown point and his delayed remedial action. Also causal was the pilot's lack of recent experience. A factor in the ac
Page 286
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
d which resulted in an inadvertent stall. Factors in this accident were an open canopy and a decrease in engine power.
ommand while returning for a precautionary landing. Contributing to the accident was the loose engine cowling.
ot rated student by the CFI for her failure to note that the fuel selector was positioned to an empty fuel tank. Also, failure o
akeoff area. Contributing factors were the high density altitude and proximity to vegetation.
clearance while hovering the helicopter. A contributing factor was the dark night light conditions.
ation, which resulted in a downwind landing, and his failure to maintain aircraft control. A factor was the tailwind.
nsuitable terrain.
by the pilot. A factor was the sudden windshift.
equate which resulted in taking off in the wrong direction on the runway. Factors associated with the accident were the tai
e fact that the aircraft was not equipped with carburetor heat protection. A factor to the accident was the crops.
ain bearing for undetermined reasons.
too low while hovering, which resulted in the tail rotor striking the ground, the separation of the blade, and subsequent fo
d, which resulted in a stall.
m, resulting in overheating of the engine. A factor was the soft ground on which the forced landing was made.
ocked during landing. A factor associated with the accident was the uneven terrain on which the landing was made.
for the wind conditions. A factor associated with the accident was a crosswind.
nt pilot allowed the aircraft to descend into the runway surface while attempting to land. Factors include the pilot's lack of
ntain directional control during takeoff resulting in an excursion off the runway and collision with adjacent foliage. A factor
while taxiing to the runway, which resulted in his failure to see and avoid the fuel truck.
/clearance above the runway during the aborted takeoff which resulted in an improper flare for landing. A factor in the acc
actured crankshaft.
g for an undetermined reason.
judgment and exceeding the aircraft's turning capability. Contributing factors were the pilots' attention being diverted, fly
esulted in a stall/mush condition. Factors associated with the accident were the wet, grass runway, and the trees near the
reason(s).
ng/decision to attempt a hover in atmospheric conditions and over terrain that would require maximum helicopter perform
plane. Factors were the pilot's failure to use the entire available runway, the high density altitude weather condition, and
off distance for the conditions, resulting in an in-flight collision with a fence, trees, and the terrain. A factor in the accident
as a result of his alcohol impairment.
CFI) to adequately supervise the instructional flight. Factors in the accident were an inadvertent spin entry by the student,
talling of the airplane.
wn resulting in a hard landing. A factor was the pilot's entrance into an inadvertent porpoise condition.
r undetermined reasons. Factors include an irrigation system in the field where the forced landing took place, and the pilot
p with adequate airspeed for the conditions (resulting in a stall/mush situation), and his failure to maintain adequate altitud
sulting from the failure of the engine build-up facility to install a vernatherm.
pilot's delay in aborting the takeoff. A factor was the road embankment.
wind conditions.
to continue the flight with an unfavorable wind. A factor related to the accident was the loss of thermal lift.
mproper fuel consumption calculations performed by the pilot.
dial action to counteract a loss of tail rotor effectiveness resulting in collision with terrain during the subsequent uncontroll
r position resulting in fuel starvation and the ditch impacted during the landing roll. A contributing factor was the pilot's fai
lting in a loss of engine power, the diminished climb rate and the altitude/clearance not possible by the pilot. Factors were
ced landing and the porpoise encountered by the pilot. Factors were the misjudged flare by the pilot and the runway light.
failure of the top engine mount and the subsequent loss of the main rotor drive belt tension. A factor was the confined are
ntrol in his turn back in the direction of the airport and the pilot not performing an emergency landing straight ahead. Fact
ble terrain due to an inoperative magneto.
Page 287
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
onfined area with two people onboard, which resulted in a loss of rotor RPM and collision with a utility pole and wires.
bounced landing. Factors were lack of total pilot experience and lack of pilot experience in aircraft make and model.
Factors were the improperly serviced brake system, the improper adjustment of the brakes by maintenance personnel, the
es and lower the landing gear.
ons and unsuitable terrain.
tation, which resulted in a loss of control of the helicopter. Contributing factors was the dark night.
all condition during a high angle of bank turn (maneuvering), and the lack of adequate altitude in which to successfully reco
ht propeller by the mechanic for his failure to properly torque the eight nuts resulting in fatigue failure of the studs and sep
ring landing, which resulted from fatigue cracking of the cable's individual wires.
ng a go-around attempt. A contributing factor was the high density altitude weather condition.
he airplane during flare/touchdown.
econd pilot. A factor to the accident was the unavailability of brakes on the flight instructor's side of the aircraft.
e airplane's brakes.
airspeed before liftoff, which resulted in a stall/mush. A factor was the pilot's lack of experience in the type of airplane.
ng which resulted in exhaustion of the fuel supply.
ntrol of the airplane due to spatial disorientation. Factors were the dark night, low ceiling and fog.
ned reasons.
by the pilot during the forced landing. Factors to the accident were the engine failure due to an overtemperature, the pilo
ed during his emergency landing. Factors were the hay rolls and the loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
for crosswind conditions.
nal control while landing.
Page 288
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ch resulted in fuel exhaustion. Also causal, was his abrupt maneuver during the forced landing, which resulted in an inadve
erse weather conditions which resulted in a forced landing. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
triction of 144 MPH. Factors included the ruddervator flutter and the out of balance ruddervators.
peed during an emergency landing which lead to an inadvertent stall/spin. A factor was the pilot's failure to secure the cock
ce from power lines.
haustion, which resulted from the pilot's inadequate preflight inspection and failure to verify the fuel supply onboard the ai
incapacitation for unknown reasons.
d reasons and the pilot's failure to maintain clearance from the fence during the forced landing attempt. Factors relating
l control of the airplane while landing. A factor associated with the accident was the crosswind.
ined reasons.
mpt a second takeoff from the short grass runway at maximum gross weight, which resulted in the inadvertent stall/mush.
to the accident were the pilot's low altitude, his abrupt pull up, the power lines, and his lack of recent flying experience.
nstrument approach procedures, and collided with a tree while executing a missed approach. Factors were low clouds, fog
of the airplane during the landing roll. Factors in this accident were; a crosswind, and the pilot lack of experience in this kin
nd impact with terrain for undetermined reasons.
the refuel the airplane. Factors were the road signs.
ontrol of the airplane. Factors were the crosswind weather condition, the airport sign, and the collapsed nose gear.
ctional control during the takeoff roll resulting in the inadvertent ground loop.
hich he miscalculated fuel consumption which resulted in fuel exhaustion.
to a simulated engine failure and the flight instructor's delayed remedial action and inadequate supervision of the flight.
by the pilot at too low an altitude and airspeed.
fuel and the pilot misjudging his altitude during the emergency procedure. A factor was the terrain condition of the corn c
ountered during landing by the pilot. A factor to the accident was the collapse of the nose gear.
, to avoid obstructions on highway US.31. Factors were the carburetor icing weather condition, no suitable terrain conditio
the airplane during an intentional inverted flat spin and the initial control inputs he used in an attempt to recover were imp
tion by the pilot, which resulted in taking off with the airplane exceeding the weight and balance limitations. Factors to th
e landing. Factors were the entanglement of the tow rope with the rudder horn, and restricted rudder movement.
ment which resulted in power loss due to fuel starvation.
ned reasons resulting in a forced landing and subsequent impact with the ground. A factor in this accident was that the pilo
ion of an ignition lead that resulted in a partial loss of engine power and forced landing to unsuitable terrain. A factor in th
of the airplane during the landing flare/touchdown. A factor was the gusty wind condition.
ountered by the pilot during the forced landing. Factors were the failure of the number four piston and cylinder, the soft te
ng, his failure to abort the takeoff, and the inadequate airspeed. Factors included the tall runway grass, the quartering tai
ain for landing. A factor was high brush along side the landing area.
d landing procedure and excessive ground speed. A delayed corrective response from the flight instructor, tailwind conditio
nal control during the landing flare and touchdown, which resulted in a blown tire, and a continued loss of directional contr
y partial engine power available.
ned reason, resulting in a forced landing, and subsequent impact with a ditch.
h the briefing administered by the pilot. Factors were the passenger's physical impairment due to an injury sustained durin
ce from a bush during the balloon landing.
n soft terrain. Factors included fuel starvation, the fuel selector valve not engaging properly, the pilot's incorrect positionin
ation by the pilot, which resulted in fuel exhaustion. A factor associated with the accident was the drainage ditch that the a
for wind conditions. Factors include variable winds during landing.
nadvertent stall at too low an altitude to allow recovery. Factors in this accident were, the pilot/owner did not verify that t
Page 289
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ush rod assembly and the unsuitable terrain encountered by the pilot.
rols that resulted in low rotor induced oscillation during a practice autorotation.
g preparation, which resulted in the fuel exhaustion, and the subsequent loss of engine power.
ng/preparation. Factors in the accident were an uphill takeoff, high vegetation, and a short runway area.
lanes to see and avoid each other and maintain proper airspace separation during visual flight rules flight.
he encounter of wake turbulence and not being able to maintain aircraft control were factors.
ol lock during his preflight inspection. Factors contributing to the accident were the pilot's failure to follow the BEFORE TA
spection, which resulted in a departure with fuel contamination. A factor was the pilot-in-command's inadequate preflight
ht planning which included improper fuel consumption calculations that led to fuel exhaustion and loss of engine power du
t's failure to maintain airspeed which resulted in failure of the carburetor and an inadvertent stall.
a bounced landing. Factors in the accident were the pilot's inadequate preflight planning/preparation, insufficient informat
e and separation of the engine's crankshaft. A factor was a vehicle on the roadway.
during climbout. A factor in the accident was the pilot's failure to reconfigure the flaps for the aborted landing.
and balance check that resulted in overloading of the airplane with spraying material, for the weather conditions that exist
for wind and his failure to maintain obstacle clearance. The crosswind was a contributing factor.
for the downdraft condition and subsequent failure to maintain proper glide path. A factor in the accident was the upslopin
hich resulted in a loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.
e clearance during takeoff. A factor was the irrigation equipment.
ecklist not followed, the lack of familiarity with the airplane, the landing gear warning system not understood, and the land
isual lookout. A contributing factor was the pilot not following recommended traffic pattern procedures.
ntaining clearance while taxiing. A factor was the dark night.
to high-cycle fatigue initiating in the surface of the fir-tree root. Factors include unsuitable terrain for an emergency landin
nue the flight into deteriorating weather, which resulted in his failure to maintain control of the airplane. Factors in the acc
rsonnel of the idle speed stop screw. The idle speed stop screw was backed off from the throttle shaft arm, not allowing th
er on site wind determination devices, and his subsequent failure to detect adverse wind conditions prior to launch of the b
isual lookout. A contributing factor was the pilot of the other aircraft not following recommended traffic pattern procedure
he winds, and his intentional attempt to takeoff into the known adverse weather. Factors associated with this accident wer
eather evaluation, which resulted in a takeoff with a tailwind, and a subsequent inadvertent stall. Factors were a high gros
e left rudder control, which resulted in a loss of control while in cruise flight.
clearance during landing.
s and lower the landing gear prior to landing. Factors were diverted attention and aural perception.
bounced landing.
d, resulting from his improper go-around procedures following a rear engine failure. A factor was the pilot's improper fuel m
site of an electrical arc mark stress riser, during cruise flight. Contributing factors were the pilot's inadequate preflight ins
Page 290
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
undetermined reasons, which resulted in a loss of engine power. A factor was the forced ocean ditching.
inadequate flare by the pilot.
during continued flight into instrument conditions and the inadequate surveillance by the operator. The inoperative attitud
raft after landing due to a loss of engine power and landing gear failure for undetermined reasons. A factor in the severity
equate fuel for the flight that resulted in fuel exhaustion and the subsequent loss of engine power.
adequate annual inspection, which resulted in the throttle linkage becoming disconnected from the throttle.
duct a precautionary landing when he first experienced a partial loss of engine power, and his subsequent failure to mainta
tion, and his failure to verify adequate fuel for the planned flight, which resulted in a loss of engine power with no suitable
nal control during landing.
of the aircraft while maneuvering after takeoff, which resulted in an inadvertent stall/spin and impact with terrain.
control while maneuvering, which resulted in an inadvertent stall. A contributing factor was the loss of engine power for un
rol in response to the uncommanded roll, and the excessive descent to the runway resulting in the hard landing. Factors r
r mast and the separation of the main rotor. Factors to the accident were the corroded main rotor mast that resulted in fat
nue the takeoff after the aircraft failed to climb or accelerate immediately after the initial liftoff. Factors were inadequate p
Contributing factors were the pilot's misjudgment of distance/speed (landing long and fast) and lack of experience in the m
ounced landing.
Page 291
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
conditioning of piston/cylinder after a previous seizure. A factor was the unsuitable terrain, to which, the forced landing wa
r glide path to the runway which resulted in the airplane contacting a 15-foot levee just short of the runway.
sit in the pilot's seat (rear seat) and improper use of brakes on landing roll resulting in a loss of directional control and subs
uel for the intended flight. Contributing to the accident was an improper fuel vapor return system.
starvation, which resulted from the pilot's improper fuel selector positioning.
of the aircraft during landing roll. Factors were high winds and crosswinds.
nt rod for an unknown reason, which resulted in a loss of aircraft control during initial takeoff climb.
rt, which resulted in fuel exhaustion. A factor related to the accident was the night light conditions.
onal control on the landing rollout. Also causal to the accident was his failure to retract flaps during the aborted landing at
during landing. A factor was the reported wind gust.
takeoff. A contributing factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
are and failure to recover from the ensuing bounced landing.
rmined reasons.
be which limited the pilots control of the aircraft.
for wind conditions. Factors associated with the accident were gusty winds, and a downdraft.
for wind conditions. A factor associated with the accident was a crosswind.
e terrain clearance during a cruise descent, which resulted in controlled flight into mountainous terrain during dark night c
material and the center plate of the transmission isolation mount.
ectional control during landing and a subsequent rejected landing. Factors were the crosswind, and the delayed corrective
e airspeed resulting in an inadvertent stall and collision with terrain.
ng/preparation which resulted in fuel contamination going undetected, which resulted in a forced landing and substantial d
ced landing. Contributing factors were the power failure due to a failed rod bearing, and down draft weather condition.
the pilot. A contributing factor was pilot fatigue.
departed a remote area of beach with three passengers to return to the lodge. The accident airplane was one of two airpl
s flight. Additional causes of the accident were an undershoot that resulted in a hard landing, and the CFI's failure to adequ
ult of the owner's failure to overhaul the engine before further flight after the lubrication system was found contaminated w
ensate for wind conditions during landing.
per glide path to the runway. Factors related to the accident were the fog conditions and the pilot’s fatigue.
ment of both fuel-selector switches, which resulted in a total loss of engine power on both engines.
e to a fuel/fuel vapor leak of undetermined origin. A secondary explosion resulted from a lack of lubrication to the number
ng banner prior to a precautionary landing resulting in the aircraft stalling and landing hard. Contributing to the accident w
e airspeed during the takeoff/initial climb, which resulted in an inadvertent stall/mush and collision with the runway that re
st valve. A factor relating to this accident was the tree.
with the power lines. Factors associated with the accident were the pilot's attention was diverted and the power lines whi
uring approach for landing.
control during the takeoff. A factor in this accident was the crosswind condition.
h resulted the right wing dropping and impacting the runway.
mined reasons, that resulted in the aircraft being ditched.
nal control of the aircraft during the landing rollout, which resulted in a ground swerve, and the aircraft exiting the runway
mined reasons.
ed reasons and nosed over in a soft field during the resulting forced landing.
for operation of the flaps resulting in flap and wing overload and separation.
rol rod in the cyclic flight control system.
blocked fuel from entering the carburetor's mixing tube and resulted in a partial loss of engine power.
om the fence post and not attaining the proper touchdown point. A factor was the fence post.
earance while maneuvering under the Cessna.
g, and in-flight planning decision to continue visual fight into deteriorating adverse weather conditions. Factors were the n
/decision and failure to ensure an adequate supply of fuel to safely complete the flight to his destination with adequate fue
Page 292
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
n flight, which resulted in an uncontrolled descent, and collision with the ground.
earance while maneuvering under the Cessna.
tch was secure, resulting in the pilot's inability to reach the flight controls necessary to maintain directional control.
n adverse weather.
l control of the airplane on landing. A factor associated with the accident was the crosswind.
or landing encountered during the forced landing. Factors were the side slip to avoid the trees initiated by the pilot, the fra
, improper in-flight planning and decision not to land before exhausting the airplane's fuel. Factors relating to this acciden
al approach, for undetermined reasons, that resulted in a hard landing.
clearance while maneuvering.
nding in water.
to make a takeoff toward obstacles, and his delayed decision to abort the takeoff, which resulted in an overrun into unsui
bounced landing.
p weight on the red blade for undetermined reasons resulting in main rotor vibration and oscillation. Sideward movement
instrument meteorological conditions into rising terrain and the air traffic controller's failure to issue a Safety Advisory.
quate airspeed while maneuvering, resulting in a stall at an altitude too low to allow recovery.
ng, which resulted in a collision with transmission wires. Factors in the accident were the pilot's improper inflight decision
nal control during landing roll. A contributing factor was the crosswind.
nal control during landing. Factors to the accident were the pipe that was struck, the crosswind, and the pilot's runway sel
ation and in-flight planning/decisions. Factors in the accident were turbulence, and a downdraft.
nstrument meteorological conditions that resulted in spatial disorientation. A factor in this accident was the pilot's inadequ
nce of the worksite to see and avoid power transmission wires.
g. Factors were a complete loss of power due to a stuck needle valve in the carburetor.
rol and altitude/clearance from the river. Factors to the accident included the pilot not obtaining an air traffic control clear
medial action upon encountering aircraft control difficulties during landing. Factors included gusty wind conditions and the
ft contained adequate fuel to complete the flight resulting in loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion and damage to th
Page 293
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
rcumstances.
sequent overstress of the airplane after a vacuum system failure during flight in instrument meteorological conditions. Fac
during final approach result in the aircraft stalling and descending uncontrolled until ground impact.
to detect and correct loose attachment fasteners and fretting at the landing gear attachment during maintenance inspecti
nal control. A factor was his improper inflight decision in selecting a less-than-favorable runway on which to land that resu
n while performing aerobatics.
on and decision to initiate a flight with an approaching rain shower. A factor in this accident was heavy rain, which reduce
hich resulted in a loss of control, and collision with the ground. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's decision to feath
o undetermined reasons. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
werve during the landing roll.
al stabilizer and rudder assemblies, during the landing approach, because of dry rot.
ear spar while performing aerobatics, which resulted in the restricted movement of the aileron.
for wind conditions. Factors were the gusty crosswind and the pilot's failure to perform a go-around upon encountering a w
anding area. Factors associated with the accident were the oil sprayed windshield, the sunglare, and an object in the wate
ce with the irrigation system. A factor was the whirlwind weather condition.
ompartment for undetermined reasons while taxiing.
mined reasons. Factors were the smoke in the cockpit, and the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
recasted turbulent weather conditions. A contributing factor was the turbulence.
touchdown point.
g which resulted in an attempted takeoff from a taxiway. A factor in the accident was the fog.
el fog due to the pilot's decision to continue VMC flight into instrument conditions, resulting in an in-flight collision with tre
ot operating handbook procedures and to refuel the airplane.
during cruise, which subsequently led to a wire strike.
rol during take-off, which resulted in a stall.
nd due to the empty hydraulic reservoir.
mined reasons while maneuvering. A contributing factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
mined reasons. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for a forced landing.
Page 294
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ontrol of the airplane. Factors were the gusts, the crosswind weather conditions, and the ditch terrain condition.
plane during the aborted takeoff and he failed to maintain directional control of the airplane during the landing roll. Factor
system contamination.
onnecting rod that resulted in the total loss of engine power.
ng the final approach to land. Factors associated with the accident are the pilot's misjudged flare, and the rough and unev
dequate spacing between two airplanes that resulted in a midair collision. Contributing Factors: the local controller decline
due to wear damage to the cylinder head threads. A factor in the accident was traffic on the highway and the pilot having
n directional control of the airplane during the landing rollout resulting in a collision with a berm.
control, which resulted in a collision with terrain. A contributing factor was the high-density altitude weather condition.
dequate spacing between two airplanes that resulted in a midair collision. Contributing Factors: the local controller decline
ain for landing. A factor in the accident was a tree stump not observed by the pilot.
ontroller to issue a wake turbulence advisory to the pilot, and a wake turbulence encounter by the pilot. Factors in the acc
d by the pilot's inadvertent stall. Factors associated with the accident are the disengagement of the stabilizer trim system
tain clearance with the Cessna 182. Factors included aircraft parked/standing on the taxiway and the refueling area, and a
tain clearance with the Cessna 182. Factors included aircraft parked/standing on the taxiway and the refueling area, and a
ng rods. A contributing factor was the lack of suitable terrain condition for the forced landing.
cation to the engine air intake system and the inadvertent engine shutdown. Factors included the low air pressure of the a
control of the balloon until all passengers were disembarked. A factor related to the accident was the gust of wind.
ear drag leg (scissors) attach point, which resulted in the landing gear becoming jammed against the landing gear door d
's failure to adequately refuel the aircraft, resulting in fuel exhaustion, and his subsequent high flare in a forced landing at
for the wind condition. Wind gust was a factor.
th an insufficient fuel quantity. A factor in the accident was the failure of the fuel boost pump.
tional control of the airplane. Factors in the accident were the passenger's inadvertent interference with the controls, and
rake, which precipitated a ground-loop.
for winds and his failure to maintain directional control. Factors include a gusting crosswind.
ce with the antenna guy wire. A factor was the pilot's physical impairment from his use of diphenhydramine.
for wind conditions. Factors associated with the accident were variable winds, and a crosswind.
for the wind, and his failure to maintain directional control of the airplane during landing. A factor was the faded improper
nal control of the airplane during the takeoff roll.
d reasons. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain available for a straight ahead landing during the takeoff initial climb.
ane, resulting in a hard landing, and causing a loss of directional control. Factors were excessive airspeed and the crosswin
o enter a canyon at an altitude insufficient to clear rising terrain. A factor was the aircraft's climb performance being exce
own point on the runway.
aking. A factor in the accident was the installation of boosted (oversize) type master brake cylinders.
ertent release) of the brakes. Contributing factors were, a standing aircraft and the other pilot's diverting his attention from
release) of the brakes. Contributing factors were, a standing aircraft and the pilot's diverting his attention from outside his
-in-command due to obstructions ahead resulting in a hard landing. Contributing to the accident was the partial loss of eng
a spring to the tail wheel/rudder control assembly, which resulted in a loss of directional control and collision with a berm.
nal control of the airplane while landing. A factor was the crosswind.
nal control during the landing flare and roll. Factors were the tree and fences.
relating to this accident were the pilot's inadequate planning/preparation for the flight, the high density altitude, and the d
n landing gear tire which resulted in it having low air pressure and the pilot's inability to maintain directional control on lan
of the airplane after landing which resulted in the inadvertent ground loop.
her maintenance personnel that resulted in a fuel leak at the main fuel line fitting to the carburetor and subsequent fuel ex
akeoff initial climb, for an undetermined reason. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
clearance with terrain. Factors were the confined area used for takeoff, and the high vegetation alongside the road.
ain aircraft control, and the pilot in command's inadequate supervision of the flight. A factor was the pilot/passenger's lack
hich resulted in fuel exhaustion. Factors were the dark night light conditions and lack of suitable terrain for the forced land
from the trees. A factor was the trees.
Page 295
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
mance planning.
of the aircraft during an aborted landing. A factor was the crosswind.
for the wind conditions. Factors were the crosswind, and a snow-covered ridge.
upervision. Contributing factors were the student's hard landing due to excessive flare and subsequent inadvertent stall, a
and the pilot's inability to stop the airplane on the runway. Factors relating to this accident were the hydroplaning conditi
mmand. Contributing factors were the approach airspeed not obtained/maintained by the pilot in command and the wind
ce from an object. Trees and inadequate ground communications were a factor.
ction and his failure to maintain directional control during takeoff. Factors were the pilot's failure to ensure that the fuel ta
the right wing attachment fitting, which resulted in the right wing separating in flight. A factor was the failure of the opera
nd. Factors relating to this accident were the student pilot's improper in-flight decisions and his failure to raise the flaps d
control during the landing. Factors relating to this accident were the pilot's improper recovery from the bounced landing a
nitial climb following takeoff, due to the restricted movement of the number two cylinder's exhaust valve.
for high, gusty wind conditions during water taxi. Factors associated with the accident are high and gusty wind conditions.
for the gusty and variable crosswind conditions. Factors were the variable and gusty crosswinds.
nd separation of the number one connecting rod.
rrain on the downwind leg for landing. Contributing to the accident was the dark night and sparse population.
ot initiating, flight into known adverse weather with an aircraft which did not have the required anti-ice equipment installed
the helicopter while attempting a landing on unsuitable terrain. A factor associated with the accident was the grass covere
r glide path on final approach. Factors include a vehicle on the roadway and a downdraft.
te airspeed during low-altitude maneuvering flight, resulting in an accelerated stall and spin. A factor was the pilot's intent
eed above power-off stall speed (Vso) while attempting a forced landing after a total loss of engine power, and his failure t
to continue his descent without visual contact with the runway, and his inattention to his altitude, in relation to the airport
ned reasons.
the collective. Factors were the student pilot's lack of experience in helicopters and the CFI's delayed remedial action.
he collective flight stop/emergency fuel augmentation switch, which resulted in engine and main rotor overspeeds, thereby
he mandatory service bulletin procedure of not exceeding 0.0005 inch paint thickness on the cylinder flange. Factors were
resulted in the inadvertent stall. A factor related to the accident was the gusting wind condition.
ate airspeed margin, resulting in a stall/mush and hard landing, and failed to maintain directional control and the left main
l action. Factors include the student's failure to properly initiate a flare, and the soft terrain immediately adjacent to the ta
he landing roll resulting in loss of directional control and subsequent nose over of the airplane.
of the airplane due to spatial disorientation. Contributory factors were the clouds, dark night light conditions, the pilot's lac
gear shimmy damper, which resulted in failure and collapse of the nose wheel landing gear during landing roll.
e the aircraft prior to a manual engine start. A contributing factor was the excessive throttle setting on start.
ned reasons.
ng a simulated engine out approach, resulting in a forced landing and the subsequent on ground impact with a pole.
hdown causing the airplane to yaw and depart the runway, resulting in the landing gear collapsing.
te clearance from a vehicle parked beside the ramp while he was taxiing the aircraft from landing.
nsation for the crosswind that resulted in the failure to maintain directional control of the airplane. Factors associated with
ay for landing. Contributing factors were his inadequate inflight planning/decision and the wood block on the runway..
nal control during the takeoff roll. A factor associated with the accident was the presence of tall brush alongside the runwa
ring hover operations. Inadequate remedial action by the pilot was a factor.
line was not maintained. The power line was a factor.
nal control of the airplane during an aborted landing.
ontamination of the fuel. Also causal in the accident was the pilot/owner's failure to repair the inoperative fuel cap.
peller blade as a result of a fatigue crack that initiated at the site of foreign object damage to the blade.
d flight instructor. Factors were loss of control by the student pilot, the flight instructor's failure to properly monitor the stu
factor associated with the accident was deep snow on the airstrip.
Page 296
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ery from a bounced landing which resulted in the collapse of the nose gear asasembly and subsequent nose over. Factors
t tail rotor drive shaft coupling by maintenance personnel after tracking the tail rotor.
e collective and the flight instructor's inadequate supervision during the practice hovering autorotation maneuver. A facto
ermined reasons. A factor was the trees.
mined reasons, and the pilot's unapproved airframe modification that resulted in the loss of flight control during the emerge
he fuel supply, which resulted in fuel starvation of the engine. A factor in the accident was the pilot's diverted attention to
haustion. Also causal was the pilot's inability to locate the airport. A factor in this accident was the dark night conditions.
to spatial disorientation. A related factor was the low ceiling.
to fatigue, which originated from a corrosion crack. A contributory factor was the pilot/owner's failure to ensure that the pr
rtical stabilizer, the loss of the vertical stabilizer, and the aircraft control not possible by the pilot.
ce during taxi. A factor associated with the accident was trees.
n shear. A collision with a tree stump during the landing roll was a factor.
ntain directional control while taxiing.
flight procedures resulting in a collision with a tree. A factor related to the accident was the low cloud ceiling.
n calculations, improper fuel management, inadequate in-flight planning/decision, flight to destination alternate not perfor
ction, which failed to remove all water from the fuel system. A factor associated with the accident was unsuitable terrain f
bounced landing.
ntrol of the tail wheel equipped aircraft while taxiing due to excessive taxi speed resulting in a collision with parked aircraft
resulting from the pilot's improper landing flare and inadequate power management.
nal items and his inadequate preflight inspection, which resulted in the unlatching of the left rear cabin door during flight a
ff run. A factor associated with the accident was glassy water conditions.
t maintained during the go-around. The pilot's failure to maintain directional control during the landing roll was a factor.
wind condition.
quate in-flight planning by his delayed use of carburetor heat. A factor associated with the accident was the unsuitable ter
nal control during an aborted landing.
airplane according to the flight manual, resulting in fuel starvation and loss of engine power during a critical phase of fligh
te rotor rpm. Unsuitable terrain was selected for the maintenance test flight operation.
ulted in a hard landing. A factor related to the accident was the uneven landing area condition.
Page 297
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ed in an off airport landing. A factor in this accident was the night light condition.
lookout during a forced landing resulting in an on-ground collision with a berm on landing roll out. Contributing to the acci
cessive rate of descent. A factor was the loss of engine power due to fuel starvation as a result of the pilot's improper pos
e which resulted in fuel exhaustion and subsequent loss of engine power. Also contributing to the accident was the pilot's
oss of engine power due to fatigue failure of the turbine-to-compressor coupling. A contributing factor was the unsuitable te
ned reasons which resulted in engine oil starvation and engine stoppage.
ng. Factors were the fuel exhaustion, the trees, and the bright night condition.
ontrol not possible during the flare by the pilot. A factor was the service bulletin not being complied with by the mechanic
ning clearance from the bank/dike. Factors were the designated examiner's delayed remedial action and the bank/dike.
judged the landing distance, and did not perform a go-around, which resulted in a nose over. The ditch was a contributing
ation. A factor in the accident was a high wind.
tank check valve, during takeoff initial climb, that resulted in fuel starvation.
plication of brakes resulting from his failure to maintain directional control during landing rollout.
to cruise due to the failure of the crankshaft counterweight. A contributing factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the fo
al disorientation. Contributing factors were the low ceilings, the dark night illumination, the lack of visual cues, and the pil
valve spring during initial climbout and that there was no suitable terrain during the forced landing. A factor was the corn c
he landing gear during the landing roll.
opter manufacturer during manufacture, which installed skins of inadequate thickness on the tail boom. A factor in the acc
uate airspeed while maneuvering to return to the runway following a loss of engine power in the takeoff initial climb. The
wind conditions during landing. A factor was the crosswind.
g which resulted in fuel exhaustion and the subsequent loss of engine power.
unway alignment during the landing roll. A factor in this accident was a slight bend in the runway.
from a bounced landing.
nal control while landing with a crosswind. Factors in the accident were the pilot's lack of familiarity in the make and mode
e/speed and failure to attain the proper touchdown point or affect a timely go-around which resulted in the aircraft overrun
m and the proper rate of descent during a forced landing/autorotation resulting in an in-flight collision with terrain. Contrib
for wind conditions while on short final landing approach. A factor was the unfavorable wind condition.
al approach which resulted in a hard landing. A contributing factor was wind shear.
ance/altitude during an emergency landing. Factors were: inadequate preflight, failure to refuel, fuel exhaustion, operating
edure by the pilot and his failure to abort the takeoff. Factors were the high grass on the runway, the pilots disregard for th
craft during takeoff for undetermined reasons. A factor associated with the accident was the soft terrain, which the airplan
mined reasons. Factors were conditions favorable for the formation of carburetor ice.
tial climb for undetermined reasons.
h the initiating event undetermined.
ng/decision by which he conducted visual flight into instrument meteorological conditions and his failure to maintain contro
ted in a hard landing and separation of the nose landing gear.
ng and preparation, that resulted in exceeding the designed weight and balance of the airplane. Factors were the pilot's us
piston failure. Factors in the accident were an out-of-rig flight control system, an inadvertent stall, and no suitable terrain
manufacturers instructions for correction of a illuminated main rotor gearbox oil pressure warning light resulting in the hel
plane to correctly set a new transponder code and an anomaly in ATC software that precluded the controller from manuall
nal control. Factors include soft terrain adjacent to the runway.
d his attempted takeoff while the helicopter's right skid was entangled with vines, which resulted in inadvertent dynamic r
stem due to the pilot's improper use of braking in downwind, downhill conditions, resulting in overheated brakes, and subs
e with a guy wire while maneuvering during an aerial application flight.
easons, the pilot not attaining proper runway alignment, and the misjudged flare by the pilot. A factor was the runway ligh
to operate close behind a large airplane at the same altitude, which resulted in a wake turbulence encounter.
he takeoff and his failure to utilize the propeller's reverse pitch function.
Page 298
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
arance with the power lines, while maneuvering during an aerial application flight.
ightcrew had during the stall recovery maneuver and the flight instructor's inadequate supervision. A factor was the inten
anks visually during the preflight inspection. A factor in the accident was the dark night.
e induction air hose, resulting in a restriction of airflow to the engine and subsequent loss of engine power. A factor was th
and his failure to recover from the bounced landing.
y the pilot and the deer on the runway. A factor was the dark night.
maintain a proper visual lookout and ensure adequate clearance, which resulted in a collision with N11938. A factor in the
g landing rollout, to see and avoid N49713, who was turning off the runway after landing from the opposite direction, resul
when it became questionable as to whether the aircraft would be able to clear an object just off the departure end of the r
to abort the glide toward the airport. A factor was the pilot's failure to comply with the published best glide speed.
bird during cruise flight that resulted in substantial damage to the airplane.
d on final approach resulting in the aircraft settling fast, touching down hard, and colliding with an embankment on the side
maintain a proper visual lookout and ensure adequate clearance, which resulted in a collision with N11938. A factor in the
g landing rollout, to see and avoid N49713, who was turning off the runway after landing from the opposite direction, resul
g updraft at the end of the runway that induced an increase in the wing's angle of attack to the critical point, which resulte
by the fracturing of the fuel pump switches during a turbulence encounter.
able terrain due to fuel starvation from a fuel strainer blocked with sealant particles.
earance from the fence. A factors was fence.
e pilot. Factors were the presence of the skydiver on the runway, and the pilot's selection of a closed runway.
mp bolt and carburetor heat not available to the pilot. Factors were the low altitude, the carburetor icing conditions, the fen
ng takeoff/initial climb, which resulted in an inadvertent stall/mush, an uncontrolled descent, and an impact with the groun
ric panel during preflight inspection resulting in the panel separating from the aircraft during climb after takeoff, passing th
e failure of the engine manufacturer's repair station personnel to install a circlip during engine overhaul, which resulted in
eded the airplane's climb performance capability during landing approach and resulted in the runway overrun during an at
which resulted in the fuel drain remaining partially open. Factors to the accident were the loss of engine power due to fuel
h both a pusher propeller blade and the rudder during an unknown phase of operation resulting in a loss of control and unc
upon experiencing directional control difficulties. Factors included the pilot's failure or inability to maintain directional con
h resulted in an inadvertent stall.
ation and attempted VFR flight into IMC, which resulted in the in-flight collision with mountainous terrain.
he unsuitable terrain the pilot encountered during the forced landing. Factors were the carburetor icing conditions and the
ng that resulted in fuel starvation and a loss of engine power, and his failure to engage the fuel boost pump in accordance
te airspeed resulting in an inadvertent stall and collision with terrain.
slope and localizer alignment during the precision instrument approach, the pilot continuing flight below the decision heigh
from his previous training in a different type of airplane, that precipitated his improper use of the elevator control during a
t during initial/takeoff climb. Contributing factors were the night conditions, low ceilings, and the pilot's lack of flight expe
unway alignment on departure and his failure to maintain clearance from the trees. The pilot's attempted flight into know
e brakes and the flight instructor's inadequate supervision which resulted in a loss of directional control and a subsequent g
ed reasons.
c system due to ice.
mined reasons, and the pilot's subsequent failure to maintain control of the airplane during the ensuing forced landing.
ng/preparation, and inadequate evaluation of weather conditions. Factors in the accident were a tailwind, and a short run
an alternate airport for fuel after encountering strong headwinds, resulting in fuel exhaustion. Factors contributing to the a
rmined reasons.
ectional control during landing with a quartering tail wind, resulting in the aircraft nosing over and coming to rest inverted.
for a bounced landing, and failure to maintain directional control of the airplane. A factor in the accident was flat lighting c
ernal engine oil leak that started an internal engine fire and the pilot's inadequate autorotation which resulted in a hard la
/directives and lower the landing gear for landing. Contributing factors were the damaged propellers making it impossible
nt approach procedures and execute a missed approach when the runway environment was not in sight at decision height.
Page 299
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
e pilot. Factors were the runway lights not on, the dark night, and the plowed field.
e, and his inadequate preflight planning/preparation. A factor associated with the accident was the pilot's selection of an u
s and directives contained in the information manual. Contributing to the accident was the flight instructor examiner/passe
ilot's improper use of the carburetor heat control. Factors were the fence and fence post.
ssembly by the pilot which resulted in shimmy of the tailwheel assembly during landing due to a worn bearing caused by d
d while maneuvering, which resulted in an inadvertent stall. A contributing factor was the pilot's use of impairing medicatio
n the airplane's minimum controllable airspeed during a single-engine go-around, which resulted in his loss of control of th
materials, and inadequate quality control of the tail rotor blades during the manufacturing process, which resulted in fatigue
esign stress limits of the aircraft. Factors were the pilot's lack of experience in aircraft make and model and improper reco
ained by the pilot which resulted in the proper touchdown point not being obtained during the approach. A factor to the ac
ide path during the final approach resulting in an undershoot of the runway. Factors were the lack of runway lights and nig
he available fuel onboard, which result in fuel starvation, and a loss of engine power.
lot's failure to maintain proper approach speed and landing touch down point.
ankshaft idler gear's loose lower retaining screw, which resulted in the fatigue failure of the crankshaft idler gear's upper r
airplane and his failure to verify the fuel supply on board, which resulted in fuel exhaustion. Factors associated with the a
medial action and his failure to ensure that the aircraft touched down at the proper location. Factors include a dark night, an
uring the approach, which lead to an overrun during the landing roll and subsequent collision with trees. A factor was the
e's fuel tank selector position, which resulted in a loss of engine power.
on system points to open.
nal control during landing.
he dual student and the dual student's loss of directional control during landing.
rol during the final turn, and the pilot's improper decision to fly the tight pattern to the closer runway. Factors relating to t
nal control during landing, resulting in a sideward skid, a collapsed main landing gear strut, and wing strike.
g due to the pilot's failure to execute a proper flare and recovery from the resultant bounced landing, causing the airplane
airplane's fuel system. This lead to the pilot inadvertently switching the fuel selector handle to the "OFF" position and sub
ce from the terrain. Factors include a dark night, densely forested, hilly terrain near the planned route of flight, and low cei
ot's continued use of the fuel selector valve that was not seating in the detents properly.
frame structural failure. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's inadvertant visual flight into instrument meteorologica
ately preflight the airplane, which resulted in the loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion. A contributing factor was th
ermined reasons.
ain for landing. A factor in the accident was the presence of weak ice.
bounced landing.
d distance to the runway while performing a forced landing after an engine failure. Factors related to the accident were th
d improper recovery from the bounced landing resulting in the overload failure of the nose gear and the airplane nosing ov
verse weather conditions during cruise flight. Factors in the accident were the low ceiling, dark night, and the pilot's failure
ntain adequate airspeed with an asymmetric thrust condition, resulting in a loss of aircraft control. A factor was an asymm
mined reasons. Factors were the bright night light condition, and the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
ching the airstrip and his failure to maintain airspeed resulted in the glider's collision with trees.
y the pilot during the emergency landing. Factors to the accident were the loss of engine power due to the failure of the cr
on unsuitable terrain. Factors include snow covered terrain.
g cruise flight due to an improper maintenance adjustment to the float valve retractor clip of the carburetor. Factors were
of the airplane while maneuvering at low altitude, and his physical impairment due to alcohol and drugs. A contributing fac
arture or en route weather briefing, which led to fuel exhaustion, after his destination and alternate airports were covered b
the collective, and the instructor pilot's inadequate remedial action.
ce of wires near the remote landing site during the high reconnaissance, and his misjudgement of the clearance from the g
strut during the landing roll. A contributing factor was the 6-foot high snow bank that the airplane impacted when it left th
control during the takeoff phase of the flight.
Page 300
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
e brakes during landing roll. Factors associated with the accident were water on the runway, low tire pressure, a sheared
flare and level off, which resulted in a heel first touchdown and subsequent hard landing during a practice autorotation. A
uate terrain clearance altitude while performing aerobatic maneuvers, which resulted in the in-flight collision with terrain.
way with vehicle traffic and obstacles and his failure to maintain proper clearance from the obstacles.
aircraft control on the ground. Factors relating to this accident were the student pilot's improper abort procedures, the sig
of the aircraft during landing.
and F-16 accident pilot to maintain an adequate visual lookout while maneuvering. Factors contributing to the accident w
st pilot. The student pilot's improper flare while landing was a factor.
dual student to begin the water takeoff with adequate clearance from the lake shore for the dual student to complete the t
remanufactured engine. A factor was the congested obstacles in the forced landing area.
clearance while maneuvering, which resulted in an in-flight collision with objects. Contributing factors were the dark nigh
sulting in an in-flight separation of the blade tip. A contributing factor was the improper maintenance procedure.
strut resulting in the left wing folding upward during the initial climb.
alignment during touchdown and rollout. Factors in the accident were the pilot's inadequate crosswind compensation, and
lock from the control column before takeoff, and his failure to abort the takeoff.
nal control on landing rollout.
is undetermined. Factors in the accident included the fence and the localizer antennas.
y and contacted the airplane. Factors associated with the accident were the night light conditions and the light snow that
causal in the accident was the under-inflated tire that flattened and locked during landing, and collapsed the nose landing
h resulted in a hard landing. Factors were lack of familiarity with the aircraft and lack of total experience.
n aircraft control on the ground. Factors relating to the accident were the high winds, the slush-covered taxiway, the snow
ate for the wind conditions and the subsequent failure to maintain control of the airplane. Factors associated with the acc
crankcase breather hose so that it was pinched when the cowling was installed. This pressurized the crankcase displacing
due to a loss of engine power as a result of carburetor icing. Factors were insufficient weather information regarding carb
ntamination resulting in fuel starvation, a forced landing and the subsequent in-flight collision with a wire.
carburetor ice. Contributing factors were the weather conditions conducive to carburetor icing and the lack of suitable terr
touchdown point.
mber 5 cylinder connecting rod separating at the rod cap, resulting in a forced landing and subsequent impact with rough u
maneuvers at a low altitude and his failure to maintain aircraft control. A contributing factor was the pilot's lack of aerobati
improper construction by the builder/pilot which rendered the aircraft uncontrollable. A factor was failure by the builder pi
flight manual regarding the use of an induction system deflector kit (snow baffles) while operating in snow, and the ingestio
clearance from terrain while performing an instrument approach. Contributing factors were the low ceiling, dark night ligh
pilot to make an evasive maneuver forcing him to the side of the runway and striking the marker lights.
le fuel supply, which resulted in a loss of engine power due to fuel starvation.
emblies by maintenance personnel, which resulted in the inadvertent feathering of both propellers after takeoff. Factors i
directional control. Factors were the service road and the nose gear collapse.
ouchdown point while landing. Factors were the pilot's improper weather evaluation, rain, a low ceiling, and a tailwind.
m carburetor icing conditions.
visual lookout during cruise flight. A contributory factor was the sun glare, which obscured the Cessna 150 pilot's visual loo
ne while maneuvering. Factors included low ceilings and the pilot's lack of instrument flight experience.
xhaustion after the pilot became lost during cruise flight. A contributing factor was the dark night condition.
per splicing of the TIT thermocouple leads by unknown persons, which led to over temperature operation of the engine du
isual lookout during cruise flight. A contributory factor was sun glare, which obscured the Cessna 150 pilot's visual lookou
being obtained/maintained by the pilot. Factors to the accident were the trees and the contamination of the pitot/static sy
Page 301
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
/clearance during the instrument approach. Factors were the low ceilings, the pilot's failure to maintain proper alignment
perly install engine cowling fasteners, which allowed the engine cowling to separate in flight.
ed in fuel starvation.
ain aircraft control during an aborted takeoff. A factor in the accident was a partial loss of engine power.
procedures published in the approved flight manual(AFM). Factors were his failure to follow the fuel management procedu
maneuvers at a low altitude and his failure to maintain terrain clearance.
anding/taxi area. A factor associated with the accident was weak ice.
-flight weather conditions, his inadequate compensation for winds, and his failure to maintain sufficient altitude and cleara
for the existing crosswind condition, which resulted in a loss of directional control and subsequent ground loop.
sulted in a hard landing. A factor related to the accident was the downdraft wind conditions.
a visual look out while transitioning from the active runway to a taxiway resulting in an on-ground collision with a taxiway
improper recovery from a bounced landing. A factor in the accident was the morning sun, which momentarily restricted t
to attempt a landing on an unlit runway at night, and his failure to maintain the proper glide path and clearance from obsta
fully extend due to a bent extension rod.
learance while maneuvering in a narrow canyon. Contributing factors were the down slope winds in excess of 50 knots an
ng that resulted in a hard landing and the subsequent overload failure of the nose gear assembly.
control during a left turning step taxi to takeoff, resulting in a wing contacting the water during the step turn.
e flight due to the fatigue fracture of the compressor coupling adapter. A contributing factor was the high sea condition ex
rol yoke from the control column.
not performed by the pilot-in-command. Trees and a fence were factors.
of the airplane, and subsequent collision with trees.
to an inadequate fuel supply. Contributing factors were the pilot's improper preflight planning, his misjudged altitude whi
ervision of the flight, the flightcrew not maintaining control of the airplane, and the flight instructor's delayed remedial acti
due to carburetor ice. A factor was unsuitable terrain.
on, and his failure to maintain terrain clearance while operating over unlighted terrain at night. Factors were the isolated a
failure to maintain control of the helicopter during a practice autorotation. A contributing factor was the student's imprope
control during the landing roll. Factors include a higher than normal approach speed.
pilot's inadequate preflight inspection.
ain wheel brakes. Factors include the pilot's failure to maintain directional control and his inadequate remedial action durin
lookout during a swath run resulting in an in-flight collision with known wires along the swath run, and a loss of directional
after hitting a soft spot (sand) in the runway resulting in the airplane going off the end of the runway and colliding with tre
cruise, which resulted in his loss of control of the airplane due to spatial disorientation. Contributing factors were the clou
otor blade, while maneuvering.
oach into a remote pinnacle landing site, dragging a skid across a rock resulting in a hard landing.
d landing. Contributing factors were the total loss of engine power due to the failure of the pilot to adjust the manual prop
control while maneuvering. Contributing factors were the pilot's failure to obtain a preflight weather briefing, his VFR flight
airplane which resulted in fuel exhaustion. Factors associated with the accident were the loose fuel cap and the snow cov
on to allow his student to land in close proximity to a hovering helicopter.
ry from a bounced landing.
e speed brakes on landing resulting in the glider colliding with trees short of the runway.
al climb due to the binding rudder, which restricted the pilot's control of the aircraft.
ensate for wind conditions.
rd of an FAA weather forecast stating VFR flight not recommended resulting in VFR flight into known instrument flight cond
ment approach procedure and his continued descent below the prescribed minimum descent altitude (MDA). Contributory f
ng and weather evaluation that resulted in the inadvertant entry into instrument meteorological conditions while conducti
ndetermined reasons.
Page 302
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
starvation resulting from the separation of the mixture control cable from the carburetor. Factors were cows, rough and une
ctive during a run-on landing, which resulted in a runway overrun. A factor was the muddy terrain.
ervision of the dual student, which resulted in a hard landing. Contributing factors were the dual student flaring the airplane
contamination (water), and failure of the pilot to have the airplane completely refueled. A factor was unsuitable terrain on
e control due to spatial disorientation while maneuvering in instrument meteorological conditions resulting in the airplane e
s while maneuvering, which resulted in an inverted flat spin, an uncontrolled descent, and an impact with terrain/water. A
upervision of the second pilot and delay taking control of the aircraft and implementing remedial action. A factor in the acc
directional control during landing roll. A contributing factor was the snow bank next to the runway.
MC, which resulted in a collision with mountainous terrain. Contributing factors were the blowing snow, turbulence, dark n
he throttle linkage was secure. A factor in the accident was the pilot's failure to take remedial action during an emergency
meteorological conditions, and his subsequent failure to maintain terrain clearance, which resulted in an in-flight collision w
epath on the instrument approach. The pilot's decision not to fly to an alternate airport and his decision to continue the ap
decision and failure to follow the prelanding checklist, resulting in the landing gear not being lowered in sufficient time to b
ilure to maintain directional control of the airplane during landing. A contributing factor was the gusty wind condition.
d landing. A factor was a total power loss due to a connecting rod failure.
anding approach due to the pilot's inadequate preflight of the airplane and contamination (water) in the carburetor.
lot/instructor of another airplane during landing. Factors in the accident were the failure of the pilot of another airplane to
r undetermined reasons.
ervision of his student and his failure to maintain control of the helicopter. Factors were the student pilot allowing the airsp
g the pre-buy inspection, the pilot's incapacitation due to carbon monoxide, and the fractured muffler.
al action during the landing roll, and subsequent on-ground collision with another airplane. Factors in the accident were th
otor gearbox, which resulted in the seizure of the duplex ball bearing and a fixed pitch setting of the tail rotor. Also causa
touchdown point. Factors included the loss of electrical power, the dark night, and the pilot's lack of night experience.
ain directional control during the practice hydraulic off run-on landing. Contributing factors were the gusty wind conditions,
ned/maintained by the pilot. Factors were the snow covered runway, the ice contaminated windshield, and the airport sno
the airplane during takeoff and he discontinued an aborted takeoff once initiated. Factors associated with the accident we
er is undetermined. A factor was the rough terrain.
ding while making a landing following a reported momentary partial loss of engine power for undetermined reasons and his
ontrol during the landing roll. A factor was the snowbank.
VFR flight into instrument meteorological conditions. Factors associated with the accident are high winds, turbulence, and
ned reasons during an extended downwind leg in the landing pattern.
esign stress limits of the aircraft.
ector valve and subsequent fuel starvation. Factors included a short emergency landing area, a wet landing surface, and a
ntain sufficient altitude while maneuvering to land, which resulted in a collision with terrain. Factors in the accident were t
e clearance during takeoff, which resulted in an inflight collision with a fence and substantial damage to the aircraft.
d from nausea during the final approach to landing. The pilot collapsed on the cyclic, which precipitated inadvertent conta
ear actuator.
ut, which resulted in a tail rotor blade strike. Factors were the CFI's delay in taking remedial action and the student pilot's l
ng, fuel management, and inadequate remedial actions, which resulted in a total loss of engine power due to fuel starvatio
e, which resulted in an on-ground collision with a parked aircraft.
ned reasons.
trol rod due to construction procedures/directives not being followed by the builder.
ane resulting from restricted forward visibility. Factors were the pilot's continued flight into known adverse weather condi
reparation, which resulted in fuel exhaustion. A factor relating to this accident was the plowed field.
edures for a straight-in autorotation with power recovery that resulted in their improper use of collective resulting in a hard
re to refuel the airplane.
craft control about the aircraft's lateral axis during landing rollout, and the resultant nose over.
h a pothole during taxi, after landing.
Page 303
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
he pistons for the landing gear actuators failed which resulted in the landing gear collapsing during landing. On ground col
n object was not maintained. A tree was a factor.
ectional control.
technique and inadequate airspeed during performance of an intentional soft field takeoff.
student pilot and the inadequate remedial action and inadequate supervision by the certified flight instructor. Factors were
cessive airspeed, excessive flare, and improper recovery from a bounced landing.
by the pilot. A factor to the accident was the deep snow.
Page 304
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
barricade.
election of an improper touchdown point. Factors were the low ceiling weather conditions and the snow covered runway.
ally disoriented, and subsequent in-flight collision with water. Contributing to the accident was the dark night with no visibl
included the dark night, icing conditions, flight into known adverse weather, and conditions conducive to pilot fatigue.
nd a non-iluminated electrical transmission wire strung across the highway upon which the pilot was attempting to make a
crews securing the oil pressure screen housing, which resulted in the loss of lubricating oil, and the subsequent seizure of t
s of the runway. Factors were the dark night conditions, and the lack of runway side lights.
s containing snow, high gusting winds, low temperatures, and a total loss of power for non mechanical reasons due to indu
rectional control and the airplane exiting the runway and colliding with a runway light.
quent in-flight collision with trees and terrain.
d in an inadvertent in-flight loss of control (stall/spin), and subsequent in-flight collision with a swamp. Contributing to the a
pproach point.
were the fence, trees, and pilot's maneuver to avoid these objects.
owing the crankshaft counterweight to contact the crankshaft resulting in a total power loss of engine power.
meteorological conditions. A factor in the accident was the pilot's failure to obtain a full weather briefing before departure
Page 305
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
with the guy wire. Factors were the failure of the air traffic controller to verify the approach he cleared the pilot to conduct
on, his lack of recent experience in type of operation, his inadvertent encounter with instrument meteorological conditions
ailure of the landing gear indication system and the pilot's diverted attention.
g in the pilot losing directional control and nosing over in soft terrain. A factor in the accident was the pilot of the other airc
buting factors to the accident were both pilot's lack of total experience in the make and model of the accident airplane and
the pilot-in-command (CFI).
high vegetation.
nsumption calculations performed by the pilot resulting in the total loss of engine power due to fuel exhaustion.
the airplane, which resulted in fuel exhaustion and subsequent collision with the ground.
ng to an alternate airport and resulted in fuel exhaustion. The pilot's failure to obtain either a preflight weather briefing or
nadequate compensation for the winds conditions, his inadequate recovery from a bounced landing, wet grass along the si
ubstantial damage to the airplane. A finding in the investigation was that all four fuel tanks had been filled before the pilot
nance personnel.
a collision with the ground during the landing flare. Contributing to the accident was the conditions conducive to carbureto
pilot's intentional shut down of the left engine, the right crosswind, the icy runway, and the snow berms on the edge of the
he airplane prematurely and failing to maintain directional control, and the flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the
g directional control, the student not maintaining proper centerline alignment, and the snowbank.
the loss of engine power and collision with trees during the subsequent emergency descent.
fence and utility pole.
Page 306
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ht into instrument meteorological conditions while attempting to maintain VFR conditions on top. The subsequent accumu
ot's inability to fly the ILS approach.
sion. A contributing factor was the failure of the arriving aircraft to comply with air traffic control requests by not issuing a
Page 307
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ally ensuring that the snap rings were fully seated in their grooves. This led to the complete separation of the No. 2 leading
sion. A contributing factor was the failure of the arriving aircraft to comply with air traffic control requests by not issuing a
wake turbulence. A factor was the air traffic controllers clearance procedure.
o cushion the touchdown, which resulted in a hard landing, and subsequent roll over.
sors, the lack of suitable terrain in the area of the forced landing, and a fence alongside the dirt upon which the pilot attem
the 20-knot tailwind and the snow-covered runway.
0 to 150 feet above sea level, the helicopter began an uncommanded right turn, followed by an uncontrollable right spin.
ident were the tailwind, low altitude maneuvering, the snow covered terrain, and the pilot's inability to successfully perform
he wire's conspicuity.
tor. Contributing factors were the crosswind and the snow bank.
MC to the point where remedial action was not possible. Factors were the weather conditions that included snow, low ceili
attempt the approach in weather conditions below the approach/landing minimums, the weather, the pilot's lack of multie
t by the pilot, which resulted in fuel exhaustion. An additional factor to the accident was the inadvertent stall/mush.
r icing, weather conditions conducive to carburetor ice, and lack of suitable terrain for landing.
y and variable crosswind conditions, which resulted in a stall/mush and a hard landing.
a contributing factor.
ower and a forced landing in the trees and damage to the aircraft. Contributing to the accident were the student's continue
on of the main landing gear, and subsequent nose over. Contributing to the accident was carburetor icing conditions.
lot/owner's failure to follow the published emergency procedure, his inadequate fuel management, and his intentional fligh
factor was the closed fuel pumps at the departure airport.
Page 308
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
cy gear extension. A factor in the accident was the undetermined failure of the electrical system.
worthy, the shift in the number two main bearing left half, and the fractured crankshaft. A factor was the rough/uneven ter
ch to make a forced landing.
d in the main rotor blades colliding with and separating the tail boom assembly while maneuvering, and the helicopters su
s (LTE) during an out-of-ground effect hover, the pilot's inadequate weather evaluation, and his failure to follow proper proc
ttention during the base turn, dark night conditions, and the tree.
ions and the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
and the pilot's failure to maintain adequate main rotor speed for an autorotative landing.
n the runway, resulting in a collision during takeoff. Contributing to the accident was the failure of the pilot and pilot-rated p
n the runway, resulting in a collision during takeoff. Contributing to the accident was the failure of the pilot and pilot-rated p
o lean the mixture in accordance with the POH, and lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
proper glidepath during the approach. Factors associated with the accident were the icing weather conditions and the rou
s include a variable, shifting wind that changed from a quartering headwind to a quartering tailwind just prior to the aircra
the airplane.
control stick. The control stick movement was restricted by the rear seat cushion which was not secured to the seat/airfra
wind. Factors were the pilot's inadvertent deactivation of the anti-skid protection, the ice contaminated runway, and the sn
ere the tree and sharply rising terrain. A factor contributing to the severity of the accident was a post-crash fuel fire.
limb performance.
nt were: 1) inadequate approach/departure control service by ATC approach/departure personnel, and the failure of the rad
Page 309
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
nt were: 1) inadequate approach/departure control service by ATC approach/departure personnel, and the failure of the rad
rosswinds that resulting in the student pilot not maintaining control and nosing the aircraft over.
ht landings).
ermined reasons, resulting in the helicopter landing hard and rolling over.
ounced landing until the aircraft impacted the runway, bounced, landed hard, and broke the main landing gear.
g conditions, and improper in-flight planning by the pilot.
A factor in the accident was that radio communication was not possible because the Piper was not so equipped, and the Be
r in the accident.
A factor in the accident was that radio communication was not possible because the Piper was not so equipped, and the Be
d landing into trees. A factor in the accident was the erratic operation of the right fuel tank quantity indicating system.
e pilot's failure to follow procedures by not feathering the right propeller, the rough terrain, and the high vegetation.
estricted forward visibility during the landing due to the tailwheel configuration. An additional factor was the pilot of N5193
pted takeoff from unsuitable terrain.
ding attempt. Factors were wind gusts, and the pilot failing to reconfigure the airplane (resetting the elevator trim and rai
er flying her residence.
Page 310
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
estricted forward visibility during the landing due to the tailwheel configuration. An additional factor was the pilot of N5193
in fuel starvation. A factor associated with the accident was the rough terrain on which the forced landing was made.
ccident were the pilot's failure to attain a proper touchdown point during the landing, the trees which were contacted, and
ent was the gusting wind conditions.
ollision with water. A factor was the dark night lighting conditions.
uting to the accident was the pilot's physical stature and strength, and the inadequate and incomplete emergency training
reign object damage.
re to maintain terrain clearance. Contributing factors were the fog, drizzle, and low ceilings.
or in this accident was the CFI's lack of total experience as a flight instructor.
dent was the in-flight loss of engine power and rotor rpm.
f the airplane.
verall lack of total (flight and tail wheel) experience.
d the capability of the airplane to maintain flight. A factor was the icing conditions.
was the rough terrain on which the forced landing was conducted.
the control stick jammed and the rough terrain which the airplane contacted.
sulting in seizure of the right brake. A factor was that directional control was not possible.
the runway.
n flight decision to continue the simulated engine failure to too low of an altitude.
rs were trees and the unavailability of suitable terrain for a forced landing.
d lack of a radio. Additional factors were the runway maintenance performed by the driver of the golf cart and the NOTAM
sive oil within the clutch assembly, the subsequent slipping of the clutch, and ultimately the disengagement of the rotor dr
ilot and inadvertent stall. Findings in the investigation were 1) in-flight collision with the tops of trees and 2) the pilot's op
e weather conditions, and the pilot's disregard for the forecasted adverse weather.
t suitable landing terrain was not available.
dent were, the barbwire fence and the clump of high vegetation encountered by the airplane.
rong airport, flat lighting conditions, and his delay in initiating a go-around.
Page 311
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
mferential score mark. A factor was the fence that the pilot flared to avoid, resulting in a hard landing.
fuel system due to an inadequate checkout by a flight instructor, and the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
roll. Factors were inaccurate in flight planning by landing with a tail wind component and lack of total pilot experience.
tors not being activated, discharge of the aircraft battery and consequent total electrical failure during flight with associate
ot recover. A factor in the accident was the pilot's lack of experience in the aircraft.
ay, resulting in an encounter with vortex turbulence from a preceding heavy aircraft landing on a parallel runway and subs
ed in the aircraft's rudder deflecting to the right, the pilot losing directional control, and the aircraft running off the runway
ctor was the pilot's diverted attention with the loss of engine power from his inadvertent activation of the auxiliary fuel pum
ident was the icing conditions.
s accident were the improper use of carburetor heat, the soft field landing attempt, and the snow covered field.
ere the pilot's failure to adhere to the balked landing checklist (FLAPS to 20) resulting in degraded climb performance, and
Page 312
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
cluded the pilot's lack of instrument time under actual conditions, and his lack of recent instrument flight experience.
l airplanes.
ailure of the threaded studs and dowel pins, the failure of the flight control system, helicopter control not being possible af
ent were the low ceilings and visibility, the pilot became disoriented after inadvertently flying into IMC, and the pilot was n
engine failure, the plowed farm field, and the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
s and failure to perform a missed approach, which resulted in a collision with the ground.
n were factors.
s accident were, the pilot's inadequate planned approach in trail of two heavier helicopters, a crosswind landing which plac
pilot's inability to utilize the engine anti-ice system. Contributing factors were the icing conditions and the lack of suitable
follow the published checklist and use the rudder assist system, and the decision not to abort the takeoff.
ain control of the airplane.
ng currency.
ce. Factors include the pilot's improper decision to attempt a landing on a runway with known directional control hazards,
he accident were the failure of the vacuum pump and the pilot's lack of recent instrument time.
Page 313
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
of the time interval from fatigue crack initiation to failure, and, the manufacturer's subsequent specification of an inadequ
during a turn to reverse direction. A contributing factor was the pilot's lack of total experience in mountain flying operatio
the high density altitude and the pilot's lack of experience and training in high density altitude operations. The pilot's deci
tail rotor control disconnection and the pilot's inability to maintain aircraft control.
al disorientation. Factors in the accident were weather conditions consisting of low ceilings, fog, a whiteout, and the pilot'
runway surface in soft sand. A factor in the accident was an earlier improper repair, which weakened the landing gear stru
e airplane contacted.
Page 314
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
arby yacht, the rough water conditions, and the pilot's loss of visual contact with the wave during the rollout.
an area of significant sink after departing his planned route of flight. Factors include downdrafts, terrain that contained no
actors in the accident were the tailwind and the stuck windsock.
ed, an inadvertent stall, and an inflight loss of control, which resulted in damage to the aircraft during landing.
ubstantial damage to the helicopter.
describes as inflight flutter of the tail section, which resulted in damage to the aft empennage area.
ne veering off the runway and the subsequent collision with a culvert.
Factors were the high vegetation that entangled the skids, resulting in the abrupt stop and nose down movement of the he
uel starvation.
Page 315
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
uctor's lack of verification that the fuel selector was in the proper position during the emergency procedure checklist. A fac
g in the shearing of the hollow pump fuel shaft, and subsequent forced landing to none suitable terrain.
ilure to achieve the proper touchdown point during a forced landing. This resulted in the pilot forcing the airplane onto the
nt collapse of the left main landing gear after the airplane departed the runway.
uitable terrain.
sequent collision with terrain.
dent was the hilly terrain condition.
wind, along with the runway light, windsock, garden, and swimming pool that the airplane contacted.
quent collision with the ground during the final landing approach.
t and the airplane drifting into a nearby tree.
wer on both engines for unknown reasons and the terrain induced turbulence.
ted in a hard landing. Factors included a restricted fuel supply due to a design flaw in the header tank/fuel valve/supply lin
power which resulted in a hard landing. Factors in the accident were weather conditions conducive to formation of carbure
ring a checkout flight resulting in an uncontrolled descent and collision with trees. A factor in the accident is the inadequat
when either on position was selected causing the engine to flood during the practice engine out approach.
nt was the pilot's excessive use of the airplane brakes.
cautionary landing with it open. Factors include the pilot's failure to follow all items on the checklist, his failure to fully secu
nfirm that the aircraft's canopy was secured prior to takeoff and impaired vision.
Page 316
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
-767 moving on the taxiway. A factor for the B-767 was the Cessna standing in the runup area. A factor for both aircraft w
ent glider.
with known deficiencies.
an unapproved rotor blade by company maintenance personnel, and the subsequent collision with trees during an emerge
the accident is the pilot's unfamiliarity with the cockpit spoiler control's location and operation.
nous terrain.
ctional control on the ground, and the crop.
per in-flight planning/decision by the pilot. Contributing factors were the weather below approach/landing minimums, nigh
ting formation aerobatics and the subsequent loss of control of both aircraft resulting in an uncontrolled descent and collis
w pass with 30-degree of flaps extended instead of the POH recommended 20-degrees. A factor in the accident was the fai
) after takeoff, and the intentional stalling of the airplane by the pilot-in-command for his attempting to bank while flying c
e partial loss of engine power due to fuel starvation and the incorrect reading of the left fuel gauge.
ting formation aerobatics and the subsequent loss of control of both aircraft resulting in an uncontrolled descent and collis
ged in commercial flight training maneuvers.
uld clear the surrounding terrain under the ambient conditions, his failure to adhere to the accepted procedure of leaning t
ect the water. The pilot's failure to perform an engine run-up before takeoff is also causal. Additional causes are the pilot's
del of the accident aircraft.
plugs and the lack of suitable terrain for the precautionary landing.
nal control of the aircraft during the landing roll were factors.
Page 317
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
vegetation (sagebrush).
uncontrolled descent. Also, inadequate supervision by the CFI for her failure to note the position of the fuel selector valve
in this accident were the flight instructor allowed the student to get too fast and high on the approach.
rom heavy tobacco use, and the loss of an undetermined amount of cabin pressurization. A factor in the loss of pressurizat
ain for the forced landing.
on final approach. Contributing factors were the pilot's premature gear extension and the berm.
er prior to descending to a low hover. This resulted in an excessive engine power requirement and the student improperly
Page 318
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
were the operator not performing the recommended overhaul of the engine, and a lack of suitable terrain for the forced la
ck of experience in the type of operation being conducted, and trees in the area where the helicopter settled.
pilot's inability to restart the engine in flight was the empty fuel tank in the left wing and the fuel gauge indication. The co
dequate pre-flight planning and takeoff with inadequate fuel for the flight.
racture of the crankshaft due to fatigue, excessive main bearing wear, and the swampy terrain condition.
l blockage of the pitot line. Factors include a quartering tailwind, a wet runway, and the pilot's decision not to lower the fla
sswind conditions, from a direction and velocity that equaled the aircraft's maximum demonstrated crosswind capability, w
re fuel exhaustion, the excessive fuel flow, and the airport perimeter fence.
rced landing.
rplane's hydraulic brake system.
and inadvertent entry into a power settling condition.
ound loop/swerve.
ving instruction allowing the airplane to approach low and slow, and failure of the instructor to maintain adequate supervis
the pilot's improper weather evaluation.
e end of the airstrip. Factors associated with the accident were the trees at the approach end of the airstrip, the pilot initia
s the ditch.
ting factor.
A factor was the pilot's improper preflight inspection when he refueled the airplane.
Page 319
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
t were the tailwind, low airspeed, low rotor rpm, and the pilot's lack of overall experience in helicopters.
al action to correct the event. Factors in the accident were crew resource management coordination concerning flight con
ht instructor, which resulted in a collision with a runway light, overload failure of the wheel axle, and the airplane nosing ov
actors include trees near the area where the pilot was attempting to land.
nd conditions, which lead to a wind shear encounter and a stall/spin. A contributing factor in the accident was the pilot's di
g which resulted in a take-off with the inadequate amount of fuel for the flight.
equent stall/spin. A contributing factor was the pilot's intentional design change/addition of a rudder to the aircraft.
ch disguised an embankment.
ilot's loss of aircraft control and the pilot's inadequate preflight inspection of the airplane. Contributing factors to the accid
ke and model.
orced landing.
y winds, downdrafts, terrain-induced turbulence, and rough/uneven terrain where the pilot elected to make the precautiona
ed the helicopter, the slope capability was exceeded, the helicopter encountered dynamic rollover, and rolled over on its ri
and the airplane's subsequent collision with the ground adjacent to the runway.
uel exhaustion and a subsequent hard landing during the emergency descent.
allowed hot gases to impinge on magneto wiring and resulted in loss of engine power. A factor was the soft terrain at the
ice. Contributing to the severity of the accident was the pilots lack of experience in the airplane which led to an inadverten
ncluded tailwind conditions, trees at the end of the runway, terrain-induced turbulence, and crops near the airstrip.
Page 320
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
t was the short grass runway with a 100-foot obstruction at the end.
high density altitude, a tailwind, and the blast fence.
total experience.
passenger not detecting the remedial action needed to correct the aircraft's nose up attitude during the approach.
actor associated with the accident was the wet field in which the forced landing was made.
overload. A factor was the complete electrical system failure during cruise flight.
hat would assure adequate obstacle clearance. Factors were high density altitude and trees.
and lack of instrument certification by the pilot.
e of the airstrip.
the trees and gusty wind conditions which resulted in turbulence on takeoff.
ling of the airplane, the crosswind condition, and the soft terrain on which the airplane touched down.
r undetermined reasons, which resulted in the proper touchdown point not being attained, an off airport landing being affe
Page 321
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ngine power and subsequent damage to the airplane during the forced landing.
r night landings.
arshaft resulting in a total loss of engine power. Factors included foreign material/substance in the engine oil, a blocked o
ot, which resulted in worn elastomeric bearings being continued in service, resulting in failure of the tail rotor assembly, a
ith a wire. A factor in the accident was the pilot's fatigue after having worked everyday for the previous 3 weeks.
gine oil, failure of the engine due to oil starvation, and a collision with trees while making a forced landing on unsuitable ter
oss of engine power due to a reduction gear failure.
r horn, restricted rudder movement, the pilot's lack of total experience in the type of operation, and no stall warning system
scending, impacting a tree, and crashing to the ground.
to the left, colliding with brush, and spinning around coming to rest in the brush.
n for the forced landing and the pilot's intentional ground loop in an attempt to avoid a ditch.
mpacting the terrain. Factors include hilly terrain near the edge of the field he was spraying.
of control while maneuvering to return to a landing area during an emergency, resulting in an uncontrolled descent and co
Page 322
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
medial action performed by the flight instructor. A factor to the accident was the runway edge light that was struck during
Factors included the pilot's failure to attain the proper glidepath on the approach, a short landing runway, and vegetation
olts, and the failure of the operator to change the u-bolt in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.
the runway edge and collision of the wingtip with the terrain.
craft which resulted in loss of turbocharger air overboard and loss of engine power and damage to the aircraft during a forc
ff. A contributing factor was the pilot's failure to ensure the door was properly closed prior to takeoff.
ure to use the brakes, and the lack of brakes on the right side for the flight instructor.
roll, resulting in the airplane departing the runway and colliding with a sign.
nd model of airplane.
m by maintenance personnel. Factors were the inadequate aircraft preflight by the second pilot who was receiving a recurr
to its climb performance being exceeded. A contributing factors was the high, rapidly rising, mountainous terrain.
ccident was the pilot disregarding the federal aviation regulations concerning the minimum altitudes required for aerobatic
actor in the accident was the pilot's diverted attention, when he inadvertently knocked the spectacles off his face while adj
which the engine failure occurred, and the landing gear overload.
Page 323
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
of tailrotor effectiveness.
e intentional low pass, a tree located in a shadow generated by the sun's low position at dusk, hilly terrain, and the 'pilot's
runway, and trees at the departure end of the runway.
of engine power due a blocked fuel line resulting in fuel starvation.
e landing gear.
n intermediate position, restricting the fuel supply to the engine, which subsequently lead to a loss of engine power.
for the forced landing.
the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
o achieve less than expected climb performance. Factors were noncompliance of a service bulletin, unsuitable terrain on w
Page 324
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
as the tailwind.
he accident were the tailwind condition and the crop that the airplane contacted.
was the crops.
was made.
anding was made.
nding. A factor in the accident was the pilot's premature rotation during the takeoff roll.
ention being diverted, flying into a known blind canyon, high temperature, and high density altitude.
mum helicopter performance, and which would leave no viable alternate actions in the event of difficulties.
weather condition, and a partial loss of power on one engine due to a burned exhaust valve.
A factor in the accident is the FAA's failure to require of the manufacturer and the manufacturer's failure to make availabl
pin entry by the student, and the pilot-in-command's failure to utilize adequate altitude for a stall demonstration.
took place, and the pilot's intentional initiation of a ground loop in order to miss the pipes of the irrigation system.
maintain adequate altitude and/or clearance above a power line on the approach path. Factors included crosswind conditio
Page 325
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
of the aircraft.
vertemperature, the pilot's lack of familiarity with the aircraft, and the trees.
etermined reasons.
ch was too high. Factors associated with the accident were the tailwind condition, the improper glidepath, and the intentio
pilot's improper loading of the airplane, outside the weight and balance limitations.
Page 326
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ttempt. Factors relating to the accident were the pilot's improper in-flight planning and decision to turn back toward the r
nadvertent stall/mush. Factors in this accident were the airplane's high gross weight and the short grass surface runway.
cent flying experience.
tors were low clouds, fog and a tree.
k of experience in this kind of aircraft.
suitable terrain conditions, the ground terrain condition, and the impacted fence.
mpt to recover were improper. A factor associated with the accident was the pilot became disoriented during the maneuv
mitations. Factors to the accident were the improper loading of the airplane, taking off from a short, up sloping runway an
der movement.
accident was that the pilot did not obtain the proper touchdown point upon landing and landed long.
ble terrain. A factor in the accident was the soybean crop in the forced landing site.
n and cylinder, the soft terrain, and the main landing gear overload and subsequent collapse.
grass, the quartering tailwind, and the trees.
an injury sustained during the initial ground impact and the high wind condition.
pilot's incorrect positioning of the fuel selector valve, and the soft terrain on which the forced landing was made.
drainage ditch that the airplane contacted.
wner did not verify that the airplane was balanced before the flight, and he did not perform any weight or balance checks.
Page 327
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
to follow the BEFORE TAKEOFF checklist, trees beyond the upwind end of the runway, and the pilot's self-induced pressure
d's inadequate preflight inspection.
loss of engine power during takeoff.
ion, insufficient information about the landing strip from company personnel, inadequate oversight of the flight by compan
rted landing.
ther conditions that existed at the time of takeoff. Factors in this accident were extremely high temperatures, which resul
ccident was the upsloping runway and nature of the terrain around the runway, which presented an optical illusion and lead
he ground.
ntainous/hilly terrain, tall trees, a high density altitude, and the pilot's diverted attention as he attempted to keep a herd o
he pilot's improper fuel management, which resulted in the rear engine failure.
s inadequate preflight inspection, improper decision, and maintenance.
Page 328
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
r on landing.
s ignition in turbulence, and the pilot's failure to follow the procedures for an airstart. Factors included the thunderstorms,
mpting to return to the airport after takeoff resulting in the airplane stalling and descending uncontrolled until impact with t
personnel, and the intentional engine shutdown during the precautionary landing by the pilot.
eflight planning/preparation, the pilot operating over the airplane's certified maximum gross weight, and the pilot selectin
with terrain.
and failure to initiate a go-around in sufficient time to avoid and in-flight collision with trees, water, and subsequent nose
-flight planning and decision resulting in the long touchdown, and the fence.
on of carburetor ice. Factors include the presence of carburetor icing conditions and an expanse of water (Columbia River)
nd subsequent in-flight collision with power lines, fence, and terrain. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's ostentatio
r. The inoperative attitude indicator and night conditions were contributing factors.
A factor in the severity of the accident was the impact with the airport marker lights.
equent failure to maintain a visual lookout during a forced landing resulting in an in-flight collision with a tree. Contributing
e power with no suitable forced landing site.
Page 329
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
g the aborted landing attempt, which lead to a loss of lift and a hard landing followed by a ground loop.
rrain during dark night conditions. Contributing factors were the rain, thuderstorm, and dust storm weather conditions, wh
anding and substantial damage to the aircraft during the emergency landing.
ft weather condition.
ane was one of two airplanes transporting lodge guests. The beach was located along an area of coast on the south side o
the CFI's failure to adequately supervise the flight.
as found contaminated with metal. Contributing factors were the pilot's decision to fly the aircraft with a non-operating lan
ubrication to the number 6 connecting rod bearing. Contributing to the pilot's injuries was his reduced visibility during the
ibuting to the accident was the pilots failure to maintain airspeed during climb after banner pickup resulting in the aircraft
n with the runway that resulted in substantial damage to the airplane.
rcraft exiting the runway and incurring substantial damage when it collided with a dirt bank.
ions. Factors were the night conditions, low clouds and fog.
nation with adequate fuel reserves, which resulted in fuel exhaustion, subsequent engine failure, and a forced landing duri
Page 330
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
irectional control.
ated by the pilot, the fractured piston, and the cracked cylinder.
s relating to this accident were the power lines, the roadway, and the ditch.
n. Sideward movement during the ensuing emergency landing resulted in a dynamic rollover.
ue a Safety Advisory.
mproper inflight decision to attempt a landing with a 14-knot tailwind, and his use of an unapproved pain medication.
an air traffic control clearance prior to departure into instrument meteorological conditions, the pilot becoming spatially dis
wind conditions and the pilot's failure to maintain aircraft control during landing.
ustion and damage to the aircraft during the subsequent forced landing.
ol roll to the right. A factor in the accident was the pilot's failure to maintain a proper glide path to his intended touchdow
of the nose landing gear.
re after landing.
Factors were the failure of the hydraulic system's motor, normal and emergency gear extension not available to the pilot,
reparation by the pilot, the high-density altitude, and the high weight of the aircraft at the time of the accident.
with the accident was the airplane stopped on the edge of the airstrip.
an IFR procedure without clearance, and the pilot's improper in-flight decision to attempt an IFR approach without clearanc
uld have allowed him to clear the trees. Factors include the pilot's failure to maintain a proper glidepath, trees off the appr
Page 331
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
rological conditions. Factors included the instrument meteorological conditions, a sheared coupling on the vacuum pump,
ng maintenance inspections.
n which to land that resulted in a ground loop.
ced landing.
ng a 70-75 degree angle of bank turning base to final while circling to land, and inadvertent stall/mush of the airplane by th
or icing following a delayed takeoff in conditions that were conducive to carburetor icing. A factor was the nonsuitable ter
uvering at a low altitude, and the pilot's inattentive visual lookout.
Page 332
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
rain condition.
g the landing roll. Factors associated with the accident were the partial power loss for undetermined reasons and the trees
e weather condition.
he local controller declined receiving a formal brief before relieving the controller on duty. The controller who was relieved
pilot. Factors in the accident were the pilot's inadequate visual lookout, the failure of the TRACON controller to notice an
he stabilizer trim system, which resulted in reduced aircraft control, an inadvertent stall by the pilot, and a large set of moo
the refueling area, and a congested/confined taxiway.
the refueling area, and a congested/confined taxiway.
low air pressure of the air intake system and the excessive fuel flow to the manifold.
the gust of wind.
the landing gear door during the extension cycle.
are in a forced landing attempt, resulting in a stall and touchdown/impact on the nose gear.
hydramine.
Page 333
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
quent inadvertent stall, and the student's failure to maintain directional control during landing roll.
the hydroplaning conditions, wet runway, the tailwind, the trees, and the ravine.
command and the wind gusts.
o ensure that the fuel tank cover was replaced properly, fuel contamination of the windscreen, and the sun angle that obsc
s the failure of the operator to perform the recommended wing attachment fitting inspection.
ailure to raise the flaps during the go around.
m the bounced landing and his failure to go-around.
population.
ti-ice equipment installed. A factor was snow conditions.
ent was the grass covered, down slope in the terrain.
ontrol and the left main landing gear separated when it struck a rock.
diately adjacent to the taxiway.
conditions, the pilot's lack of total instrument flight time, and the pilot's self-induced pressure to complete the flight.
landing roll.
ng on start.
. Factors associated with the accident were the crosswind, the ditch, the student's lack of experience, and the poor in-fligh
ock on the runway..
ush alongside the runway.
properly monitor the student pilot's rate of descent on final approach, and the flight instructor's lack of recent experience
Page 334
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
he corn crop.
e of the brake system, a tailwind, and a parked aircraft.
nt meteorological conditions. A factor in the accident was the pilot's lack of experience in nighttime operations.
d the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
a worn seal.
ilure to obtain a weather briefing, the weather conditions which included clouds and obscuration, the residence and the tre
n clearance, which resulted in a collision with terrain. Factors were a dark night, clouds, fog, mountainous terrain, and lack
ed landing.
A factor in the accident was the pilot's failure to maintain airspeed while maneuvering for a field.
opter. Factors were the fog and the pilot's lack of instrument flight experience.
uent nose over. Factors were the pilot's lack of certification and the runway light.
ation maneuver. A factor was the underlying soft dirt terrain, which promoted the rollover event.
ure to ensure that the propeller was overhauled at the manufacturer's recommended interval.
cloud ceiling.
tion alternate not performed, and the discontinued planned approach to the initially selected runway. Contributing factors
was unsuitable terrain for a forced landing.
abin door during flight and allowing a plastic garment bag to blow out and strike the tail rotor.
g a critical phase of flight. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for a forced landing and the presence of utility lines at t
Page 335
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Contributing to the accident was a reported loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
the pilot's improper positioning of the fuel selectors.
accident was the pilot's failure to feather the engine.
tor was the unsuitable terrain for a forced landing.
oom. A factor in the accident was the failure of the manufacturer's quality control system to detect the inadequate thickn
akeoff initial climb. The loss of power was probably due to the pilot's failure to ensure that an adequate fuel supply existed
uel exhaustion, operating with an inoperative fuel gauge, and failure to attain a proper glide path during approach.
the pilots disregard for the runway conditions, his lack of total experience in the aircraft, the trees, and the pilots failure to
errain, which the airplane encountered during the aborted takeoff.
ailure to maintain control of the airplane. Contributing factors were low ceiling, spatial disorientation and lack of instrume
actors were the pilot's use of inappropriate medications and the collision with trees.
and no suitable terrain for a forced landing.
light resulting in the helicopter being dispatched on a ferry flight with a failed main rotor gearbox oil pump, failure of the m
controller from manually overriding the resulting inhibition of displayed data. Factors in the accident were impaired funct
Page 336
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
e power. A factor was the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
N11938. A factor in the accident was the failure of each pilot to communicate with the other.
opposite direction, resulting in the 2 aircraft colliding on the runway.
he departure end of the runway, and the pilot's failure to maintain clearance from the object as he attempted to continue th
best glide speed.
ed runway.
r icing conditions, the fence and the security gate.
n impact with the ground. Factors in the accident were the pilot's improper preflightplanning/preparation and failure to ve
b after takeoff, passing through the propeller and damaging wing flap fabric, loss of engine power due to wing flap fabric w
rhaul, which resulted in the turbine assembly aft support bearing becoming dislodged and seized on the shaft. A factor in
way overrun during an attempted go-around.
ngine power due to fuel starvation, the partially open fuel drain, the unsuitable terrain for landing encountered by the pilo
a loss of control and uncontrolled descent to terrain.
maintain directional control, and a taxiway sign.
below the decision height, the pilot not performing a missed approach, and the pilot not maintaining altitude/clearance fro
elevator control during a go-around.
pilot's lack of flight experience in actual instrument meteorological conditions at night.
tempted flight into known adverse weather, his lack of instrument experience, the fog, and the trees were contributing fac
ntrol and a subsequent ground swerve during which the aircraft exited the runway and collided with a runway sign.
Page 337
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
worn bearing caused by dirt infiltration which resulted in the pilot being unable to control the airplane and the airplane grou
se of impairing medications.
n his loss of control of the airplane. Contributory factors were the engine fire, the pilot's failure to follow the emergency ch
which resulted in fatigue failure of the blade.
model and improper recovery from a bounced landing.
roach. A factor to the accident was the rising embankment.
of runway lights and night lighting condition.
way. Factors relating to the accident were the pilot's inadequate distance/altitude in the traffic pattern and the stall.
ng, causing the airplane to depart the runway, enter the uneven grass infield, and sustain a nose over.
e "OFF" position and subsequently to a loss of engine power due to fuel starvation.
oute of flight, and low ceilings in the area of the accident.
d to the accident were the pilot's inadequate rebuilding procedures and maintenance inspection, which resulted in contam
nd the airplane nosing over.
ht, and the pilot's failure to obtain in-flight weather advisories.
A factor was an asymmetric engine thrust condition, which was present for undetermined reasons.
e forced landing.
ue to the failure of the crankshaft, the pilot misjudging the descent glide path, and the presence of the highway embankme
arburetor. Factors were the lack of suitable terrain for a forced landing and high vegetation.
drugs. A contributing factor was the downdraft.
e airports were covered by fog. A factor was the fog.
the clearance from the ground during the attempted hovering turn to avoid the wire obstacle. Factors were the dark night
impacted when it left the runway.
Page 338
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ire pressure, a sheared tire valve stem, and a fractured landing gear axle.
practice autorotation. Also causal was the instructor pilot's inadequate supervision of the student.
ht collision with terrain.
buting to the accident were: the F-16 flight lead pilot’s decision to discontinue radar traffic advisory service, the F-16 fligh
tudent to complete the takeoff and the failure of the instructor pilot to recognize in a timely manner during the takeoff tha
overed taxiway, the snowbank, inadequate preflight planning by the flight instructor, and the instructor pilot's failure to ta
associated with the accident were the crosswind, the runway light, and the tree.
the crankcase displacing the oil seal and forcing oil out of the engine. A factor was the unsuitable terrain encountered dur
ormation regarding carburetor icing in the pilot's operating handbook for the aircraft and delay by the pilot in applying carb
s after takeoff. Factors included a lack of rigging experience in airplane make and model by maintenance personnel, uncle
condition.
eration of the engine due to inaccurate TIT gauge readings. Contributing factors were the manufacturer's stamp on the to
150 pilot's visual lookout.
tion of the pitot/static system.
Page 339
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
intain proper alignment and glidepath during the approach, his lack of recent instrument experience, and his failure to per
in excess of 50 knots and the pilot's improper decision to enter the canyon given the wind conditions.
e step turn.
he high sea condition existing for the forced landing.
s misjudged altitude while performing the emergency landing, and his lack of certificate qualification and recent flight expe
r's delayed remedial action which resulted in the inadvertent spin. Factors to the accident were the inadvertent spin and t
adjust the manual propeller pitch to permit the engine to achieve sufficient rpm for sustained flight, and the subsequent f
er briefing, his VFR flight into IMC, lack of instrument certification, spatial disorientation, low ceiling, and snow.
uel cap and the snow covered terrain.
wn instrument flight conditions, loss of aircraft control due to spatial disorientation, and subsequent in-flight descent and in
de (MDA). Contributory factors were the pilot's physical impairment from drugs, the low ceiling, fog, and dark night light co
onditions while conducting visual flight. A factor was fog and the night visual conditions.
Page 340
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
snow, turbulence, dark night light conditions, and pilot fatigue due to the long flight day.
on during an emergency landing and overrun.
in an in-flight collision with terrain. Contributing factors were the pilot's failure to obtain a weather briefing, low ceilings, s
cision to continue the approach in weather conditions below the published minimums were contributing factors.
ed in sufficient time to be verified down and locked, which resulted in a wheels up landing and substantial damage to the a
usty wind condition.
n the carburetor.
ot of another airplane to maintain directional control, and the lack of available brakes to the pilot/instructor of another airp
nt pilot allowing the airspeed and main rotor RPM to get too low during the simulated emergency.
s in the accident were the student pilot's failure to maintain directional control of the airplane, and the lack of brake pedals
he tail rotor. Also causal, was the pilot's loss of control, which was the result of a relative low speed/high power combinati
of night experience.
e gusty wind conditions, and the non-breakaway runway edge light.
hield, and the airport snow removal performed by the driver of the vehicle.
ted with the accident were the inaccurate elevator trim indicator, the pilot's failure to verify the trim setting, rotation was r
ermined reasons and his decision to make a go-around from the approach resulting in a landing in a field and collapse of th
n adverse weather conditions, the icing conditions, and the iced windshield.
Page 341
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
uctor's decision to send the student pilot on a solo flight in known adverse weather conditions. Factors to the accident we
instructor. Factors were the snow and ice covered runway and the snowbank.
Page 342
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
rical generator.
mp. Contributing to the accident was the pilot's impairment due to marihuana.
gine power.
riefing before departure which accurately forecast the conditions encountered.
Page 343
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ared the pilot to conduct was in service, and the clouds which restricted the visibility of the communications antenna.
he accident airplane and the loss of right engine power for an undetermined reason.
l exhaustion.
Page 344
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
at takeoff); the pilot's failure to follow the emergency checklist, and not jettisoning the external load.
the pilot-in-command.
e pilot's disregard for the wind direction resulting in a 12 knot tailwind on departure.
forced landing.
The subsequent accumulation of structural icing required an emergency descent into conditions of low cloud ceilings and o
Page 345
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ation of the No. 2 leading counterweight and the partial separation of the No. 3 trailing weight from the crankshaft and a re
equests by not issuing a position report.
ncontrollable right spin. The helicopter spun several times then impacted the water. The two right landing gear legs collap
included snow, low ceiling, and obscuration, a dark night, impairment of the pilot's judgement by the use of a contraindica
the pilot's lack of multiengine instrument experience, and spatial disorientation by the pilot.
vertent stall/mush.
e the student's continued flight with known engine problems and his not performing a precautionary landing.
or icing conditions.
, and his intentional flight with known deficiencies which included an inoperative fuel quantity system.
Page 346
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
was the rough/uneven terrain and the ferry permit's procedures not followed by the pilot in command.
he pilot and pilot-rated passenger on board N79960 to ensure that the runway was clear of traffic before taxiing onto the r
he pilot and pilot-rated passenger on board N79960 to ensure that the runway was clear of traffic before taxiing onto the r
r conditions and the rough terrain that the airplane encountered during the undershoot landing.
nd just prior to the aircraft touching down on the runway, and soft, wet terrain just off the edge of the runway surface.
takeoff. Also causal was the pilot's failure to maintain an adequate airspeed while attempting to clear a power line during
ecured to the seat/airframe. A factor associated with the accident was the trees which the airplane contacted.
ated runway, and the snow covered terrain beyond the runway.
and the failure of the radar approach controller to advise the local tower controller of the change in approach procedure fo
Page 347
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
and the failure of the radar approach controller to advise the local tower controller of the change in approach procedure fo
landing gear.
ty indicating system.
e high vegetation.
or was the pilot of N51933 entered the traffic pattern on base leg and flew a short final approach which reduced his ability
Page 348
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
or was the pilot of N51933 entered the traffic pattern on base leg and flew a short final approach which reduced his ability
d landing was made.
ch were contacted, and the pilot's lack of familiarity with this specific airplane.
Page 349
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
uring flight with associated disabling of normal landing gear extension capability), and his subsequent failure to properly pe
anding abort. Also causal was the pilot's failure to retract the flaps to the go around/aborted landing position.
parallel runway and subsequent loss of aircraft control. Factors included the pilot's lack of total flying experience, and cros
covered field.
climb performance, and the power lines in his flight path.
ce of improper installation.
Page 350
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
t flight experience.
trol not being possible after the flight control failure, and the inadequate maintenance procedures by the company mainten
swind landing which placed the accident aircraft downwind of the rotor wash of the two heavier helicopters, and the pilot's
and the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
ectional control hazards, and long grass present on the runway surface.
Page 351
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
rations. The pilot's decision to takeoff downwind, while reasonable given the nature of the obstacles and terrain on the ot
d by the pilot.
on of aircraft control.
Page 352
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
the rollout.
errain that contained no suitable landing sites, and trees at the location where the pilot found it necessary to execute a for
ring landing.
ng factors were the non-installation of an anti-rotation bracket to secure the elbow fitting, the kit manufacturer's failure to
own movement of the helicopter, and the training pilot's inappropriate response to the nose pitch down.
tarvation. A contributing factor was the blocked fuel ejector pump in the aft fuel tank and an inadequate maintenance leve
o review the instrument approach procedure and the copilot failed to provide accurate information regarding terrain cleara
nce limitations.
Page 353
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
rocedure checklist. A factor was the worn fuel selector "off" detent that allowed inadvertent movement of the fuel selector
ng the airplane onto the ground hard, and subsequent separation of the landing gear.
tank/fuel valve/supply line combination, and the pilot's lack of experience in airplane make and model.
e to formation of carburetor icing, and the uphill slope of the field chosen for the forced landing.
t, his failure to fully secure the canopy/door prior to takeoff, the movement of the pilot's seat pan while in flight, the restric
e undershoot.
Page 354
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
/landing minimums, night conditions, the pilot's lack of total instrument time and fatigue.
rolled descent and collision of both aircraft with the terrain. A factor in the accident was the faulty design of the belly-to-be
the accident was the failure of the student to retract the flaps from 40 degrees to 20 degrees during the go-around from a
ng to bank while flying close to stall airspeed.
rolled descent and collision of both aircraft with the terrain. A factor in the accident was the faulty design of the belly-to-be
ed procedure of leaning the fuel mixture for high-altitude takeoff, high density altitude, downdrafts, mountainous terrain, a
nal causes are the pilot's failure to maintain an adequate airspeed margin for the bank angle he initiated during the attemp
Page 355
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
of the fuel selector valve and her failure to maintain control of the airplane. Factors in the accident were the flight crews l
-command to turn toward mountainous terrain (where a turn toward lower and level terrain was a viable option), mountain
al experience.
diverted attention due to smoke in the cockpit, and the tailwind weather condition.
ecute a forced landing, and a high rate of descent at the moment the aircraft touched down.
d the student improperly coordinated the use of the collective and anti-torque controls.
Page 356
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ter settled.
ata not being calculated, the correct procedures/directives for a short field takeoff with obstacles not being followed by the
e airstrip, the pilot initially landed long, the grass airstrip was wet, and the fence post which the airplane contacted.
Page 357
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ccident was the pilot's diverted attention due to looking at antelope on the ground, and, his decision to attempt the steep t
er to the aircraft.
mergency turn back to the airfield, resulting in a stall. Factors included: an unapproved fuel tank installation; the pilot's la
uting factors to the accident were the obstructed induction air ducting, the weather condition that was conducive for carbu
Page 358
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ng the approach.
irport landing being affected, and substantial damage to the aircraft during the emergency landing.
Page 359
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
e in the airplane's ability, and his impairment from an over-the-counter cold/allergy drug.
e engine oil, a blocked oil delivery tube oil jet, and oil starvation in the area of the spur adapter gearshaft.
he tail rotor assembly, and damage to the helicopter during a hard landing.
evious 3 weeks.
anding on unsuitable terrain.
ontrolled descent and collision with a residence, and the ground. Factors contributing to the accident were an improper flap
Page 360
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ommendations.
the aircraft during a forced landing. Contributing to the accident was inadequate inspection requirements for the inter-coo
ho was receiving a recurrency check ride, and the inadequate supervision, of the second pilot who was performing the prefl
ntainous terrain.
es required for aerobatic operations.
Page 361
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
system failure, which resulted the loss of control during taxi, departure from the taxiway, and collision with a building.
s of engine power.
Page 362
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
hard landing. Contributing to the accident was the total loss of engine power due to fuel starvation, and inadequate preflig
failure to make available in the performance section of the aircraft POH, specific adjustments to the, "Takeoff Distance wit
emonstration.
rigation system.
uded crosswind conditions, terrain-induced turbulence, and the power line.
d carburetor bowl and the stall the pilot encountered during his turn in the direction of the airport.
Page 363
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
tion were 1) the mechanic who installed the right propeller used un-calibrated torque wrenches, and 2) the mechanic who
depath, and the intentional ground loop/swerve, and the fence at the end of the runway.
ht Instructor.
Page 364
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
o turn back toward the runway during the forced landing attempt, the airport fence, and the corn crop.
ng was made.
Page 365
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
t of the flight by company personnel, and high vegetation at the landing strip.
flight planning.
remaining closed during a power input via the throttle control linkage during the approach to landing phase.
Page 366
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ht, and the pilot selecting the wrong runway which resulted in a downwind takeoff.
with a tree. Contributing to the accident was a reported partial loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
mmanded roll, the high crosswind, the pilot's recovery from the bounced landing, and his inadequate preflight planning in
ance data, trees off the departure end of the runway, a high density altitude environment, and wet, swampy/marshy terrain
Page 367
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
m weather conditions, which likely reduced visibility in the area at the time of the accident.
coast on the south side of low mountains. The pilots of the two airplanes discussed several routes of travel to the lodge, lo
with a non-operating landing gear system, which resulted in a forced landing, and the lack of suitable terrain for the forced
ced visibility during the forced landing, resulting from a heavy concentration of smoke in the cockpit.
resulting in the aircraft entered the early stages of a stall, and the pilots failure to recognize the early stages of a stall and
and a forced landing during, which the aircraft incurred substantial damage.
Page 368
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
d pain medication.
o his intended touchdown point, which resulted in a single engine go-around attempt.
ot available to the pilot, and the wheels up landing performed by the pilot.
the accident.
pproach without clearance. Factors were the local weather being below published minimums, the trees, and the dark nigh
epath, trees off the approach end of the runway, and a downdraft in the vicinity of the approach path.
aneuvering.
Page 369
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ng on the vacuum pump, the pilot/owner's failure to ensure the coupling was changed per the manufacturer's recommenda
ision to fly into rising terrain, the rising terrain, the blind canyon, and the tree.
Page 370
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
troller who was relieved failed to ensure proper briefing of local traffic.
troller who was relieved failed to ensure proper briefing of local traffic.
N controller to notice an aircraft as a heavy jet, and insufficiently defined TRACON procedures used to facilitate prearrange
ot, and a large set of moose antlers attached to the left float, which disrupted the airflow over the stabilizer.
separation of the mixture control cable resulting in the mixture control arm moving to the idle cutoff position.
Page 371
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
rs include the pilot's failure to use a checklist, fuel starvation, and an inadequate fuel valve location.
ne blades. A factor associated with the accident was the manufacturer's inadequate design of the flight stop switch, which
oseness of the cylinder; and the subsequent vibration and fatigue separation of the fuel injector line. An additional factor w
nce, and the poor in-flight planning decision to land on a runway with a direct crosswind.
Page 372
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
me operations.
ay. Contributing factors were the fuel system not understood by the pilot. The tree was additional factor.
Page 373
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
No. 3 exhaust valve for undetermined reasons, and the pilot's lack of total experience in the R22 and recent experience in
during approach.
and the pilots failure to maintain clearance from the trees.
oil pump, failure of the main rotor gearbox combining gearbox gears due to oil starvation, loss of main rotor RPM, and the
ent were impaired function of the collision avoidance system in the airplane due to structural masking of the other airplan
Page 374
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
attempted to continue the departure. Factors include operating with a known engine deficiency, and a power line strung ju
paration and failure to verify takeoff performance prior to executing a takeoff upslope on a rough/uneven runway.
due to wing flap fabric wrapping around the propeller, and damage to the aircraft during a forced landing into trees.
on the shaft. A factor in the accident was the rough and uneven nature of the landing site terrain.
encountered by the pilot during the forced landing, and the corn crop.
ng altitude/clearance from the trees and terrain. Contributing factors to the accident were the air traffic controller not issu
Page 375
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
follow the emergency checklist and feather the propeller, and the partial failure of the landing gear indicating system, whi
ctors were the dark night and the incorrect information provided by the ground crew.
Page 376
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ry service, the F-16 flight lead pilot’s failure to identify a position error in his aircraft’s navigational system, the F-16 pilots
er during the takeoff that there was not adequate clearance from the lake shore to complete the takeoff and abort the take
enance personnel, unclear maintenance manual information, and unsuitable terrain for the forced landing.
cturer's stamp on the top of the piston, which created a stress riser leading to fatigue cracking of the piston, and the lack o
Page 377
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ole. A contributing factor was his failure to divert to an airport with constant runway lighting.
n-flight collision.
ht in an over weight condition.
ht, and the subsequent fouling of the spark plugs due to the over rich fuel condition.
g, and snow.
Page 378
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
that the aircraft's weight and center of gravity limitations had not been exceeded.
ration of the collective flight control.
er briefing, low ceilings, snow, high winds, and dark night light conditions.
buting factors.
bstantial damage to the airplane.
m setting, rotation was restricted, directional control was not maintained, and the berm which the airplane contacted.
a field and collapse of the nose landing gear following a reported total loss of engine power for undetermined reasons.
in on a dark night, which discouraged the pilot from attempting to land at the first signs of discomfort.
Page 379
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ctors to the accident were the snow showers, the student pilot becoming lost, the student pilot not using the pitot heat, th
Page 380
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
unications antenna.
ne contacted.
Page 381
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 382
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
m the crankshaft and a resulting internal catastrophic engine failure. A factor in the accident was the lack of definitive proc
landing gear legs collapsed and the helicopter rolled onto its right side and sank. The pilot and observer both exited with
ary landing.
Page 383
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
before taxiing onto the runway. Also contributing to the accident was the failure of air traffic control guidance and procedu
before taxiing onto the runway. Also contributing to the accident was the failure of air traffic control guidance and procedu
he runway surface.
clear a power line during the ensuing forced landing, which resulted in an inadvertent stall.
e contacted.
n approach procedure for N51ML; 2) the excessive and extraneous radio communications by the local controller which prev
Page 384
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
n approach procedure for N51ML; 2) the excessive and extraneous radio communications by the local controller which prev
Page 385
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
taining clearance from the electric fences which were also hidden objects against the grass landing surface.
Page 386
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ent failure to properly perform a manual landing gear extension resulting in a landing with the gear not down-and-locked.
ng position.
Page 387
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
elicopters, and the pilot's lack of total experience in this make and model helicopter.
Page 388
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
les and terrain on the other runways, set up a situation where decreased safety margins existed and is considered a factor
Page 389
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
manufacturer's failure to issue a notice of the bracket design to previous aircraft owners, and the pilot's not establishing/ma
Page 390
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
while in flight, the restriction of the control stick movement by the displaced seat pan, and the pilot/builders failure to adeq
Page 391
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
design of the belly-to-belly maneuver that required the wingman to discontinue continuous observation of the lead aircraf
design of the belly-to-belly maneuver that required the wingman to discontinue continuous observation of the lead aircraf
Page 392
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
nt were the flight crews lack of experience in the accident airplane, improper painting of the arrow on the fuel selector han
viable option), mountainous terrain, and insufficient altitude available for stall recovery.
Page 393
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
not being followed by the pilot, the trees, and the encountered stall.
irplane contacted.
Page 394
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
nstallation; the pilot's lack of recurrent flight training; the pilot's lack of recent experience; and the aircraft's low altitude a
was conducive for carburetor icing, the low altitude maneuver attempted by the pilot, the encountered stall/spin and the t
Page 395
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
nt were an improper flap setting, and the aircraft's gross weight being exceeded.
Page 396
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ements for the inter-cooler system and inadequate inspection of the inter-cooler system by the mechanic during the last in
Page 397
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 398
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
n, and inadequate preflight planning preparation by the CFI for her failure to review the airplane systems with the pilot rate
he, "Takeoff Distance with Dispersal Equipment" chart for conditions other than sea level, standard atmospheric conditions
Page 399
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
nd 2) the mechanic who installed the right propeller used an outdated Service Manual.
Page 400
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ing phase.
Page 401
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ined reasons.
ate preflight planning in preparing for the wind conditions at the airport.
, swampy/marshy terrain in the area where the pilot found it necessary to execute a precautionary/emergency landing.
Page 402
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
of travel to the lodge, located on the north side of the mountains. All of the routes necessitated traversing mountain pass
Page 403
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 404
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ufacturer's recommendations, a lack of regulatory requirement to ensure compliance with the manufacturer's recommend
Page 405
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
off position.
Page 406
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
flight stop switch, which has insufficient safeguards to preclude inadvertent activation.
e. An additional factor was the pilot's operation of the rotorcraft outside the height/velocity parameters for a successful au
Page 407
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 408
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
main rotor RPM, and the helicopter colliding with trees and the ground during an uncontrolled descent.
king of the other airplane's transponder antenna, an intermittent failure of the approach controller's communication radio
Page 409
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
nd a power line strung just off the departure end of the runway.
uneven runway.
anding into trees.
traffic controller not issuing the current weather conditions to the pilot prior to the approach clearance, the weather condit
Page 410
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 411
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
l system, the F-16 pilots subsequent inadvertent entry into class C airspace without establishing and maintaining required
akeoff and abort the takeoff, resulting in the airplane colliding with the terrain near the lake shore and coming to rest in a fi
the piston, and the lack of suitable terrain for the forced landing.
Page 412
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 413
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
airplane contacted.
ndetermined reasons.
Page 414
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
t using the pitot heat, the snow covered terrain, the precautionary landing performed by the student pilot, and the student
Page 415
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
he lack of definitive procedural guidance in any of the engine manufacturer's reference material, available at the time, on
bserver both exited without any difficulties and were rescued by the ship's crewmembers. The pilot reported that he hadn
Page 416
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ol guidance and procedures to incorporate redundant methods of verifying aircraft position for both controllers and pilots.
ol guidance and procedures to incorporate redundant methods of verifying aircraft position for both controllers and pilots.
ocal controller which prevented both pilots from providing timely position information during the critical period prior to the
Page 417
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ocal controller which prevented both pilots from providing timely position information during the critical period prior to the
Page 418
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 419
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ar not down-and-locked. Factors included: the pilot's lack of experience in type, steps not listed in the manufacturer's Airpl
Page 420
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
nd is considered a factor.
Page 421
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 422
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 423
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
pin. Factors in the accident include the pilot's failure to detect the power deficiency early in the takeoff roll due to his dive
Page 424
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
on the fuel selector handle by an unknown person, and the improper placement of the fuel selector handle to the off posit
Page 425
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 426
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 427
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
stems with the pilot rated student. Also, inattention by the pilot rated student for his failure to reposition the fuel selector
Page 428
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
y/emergency landing.
Page 429
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
aversing mountain passes of varying elevations. A scattered layer of low clouds partially obscured several mountain tops.
Page 430
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
nufacturer's recommendations, and a lack of regulatory requirement to ensure installation of a suitable backup system.
Page 431
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 432
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
's communication radio transmitter which interfered with his ability to communicate traffic information to the pilots, the fa
Page 433
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ance, the weather conditions being below the instrument approach landing minimums, the pilot's lack of recent experience
Page 434
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
nd maintaining required communications with air traffic control (ATC); and ATC’s lack of awareness that there was more th
and coming to rest in a field about 900 feet inland from the lake shore.
Page 435
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 436
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ot reported that he hadn't noted any unusual noises or vibrations prior to the accident. The helicopter mechanic witnessed
Page 437
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 438
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 439
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
the manufacturer's Airplane Flight Manual (AFM) GENERATOR INOPERATIVE procedure, conditions not listed in the manufac
Page 440
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
akeoff roll due to his diverted attention by a nonpertinent personal conversation with the local controller, and, the lack of s
Page 441
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 442
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 443
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
d several mountain tops. The two pilots verbally agreed to head toward a pass that would require a longer flight, but would
Page 444
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 445
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ation to the pilots, the failure of both the approach controller and the tower controller to issue safety alerts when the traffic
Page 446
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ack of recent experience in instrument flight rules (IFR) operations and the pilot disregarding federal regulations regarding
Page 447
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
s that there was more than one F-16 aircraft in the formation flight, which reduced the ATC controllers ability to detect and
Page 448
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
pter mechanic witnessed the accident from the ship's deck. He saw the helicopter takeoff and begin spinning to the right.
Page 449
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
not listed in the manufacturer's AFM MANUAL LANDING GEAR EXTENSION procedure; and the FAA's inadequate approval o
Page 450
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
troller, and, the lack of suitable forced landing sites in the takeoff flight path.
Page 451
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
a longer flight, but would traverse lower terrain. After the two airplanes departed the beach, the pilot of the second airplan
Page 452
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ty alerts when the traffic conflict became apparent, and the failure of the flight crew to maintain an adequate visual lookou
Page 453
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 454
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
llers ability to detect and resolve the conflict that resulted in the collision.
Page 455
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
gin spinning to the right. He didn't note any unusual noises or see any components separate from the helicopter.
Page 456
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 457
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ilot of the second airplane was initially leading the flight of two airplanes. After departure, the pilot of the first airplane rep
Page 458
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 459
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
the helicopter.
Page 460
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ot of the first airplane reported that the most direct route through the mountains appeared to be open, and he elected to p
Page 461
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
pen, and he elected to proceed toward the pass. The pilot of the second airplane then followed the first airplane by about
Page 462
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
e first airplane by about 1/3 mile, and remained in radio contact with the first pilot. The two airplanes climbed to 3,000 fee
Page 463
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
nes climbed to 3,000 feet msl, heading for the mountain pass. The second pilot said that 3,000 feet msl was the minimum
Page 464
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
et msl was the minimum altitude that he and the first pilot normally utilized to cross the pass. As the two airplanes procee
Page 465
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
the two airplanes proceeded northbound toward the pass, the pilot of the second airplane observed a solid layer of low clo
Page 466
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
d a solid layer of low clouds obscuring the pass, and he began to lose sight of the first airplane in clouds. He then lost sigh
Page 467
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
clouds. He then lost sight of the first airplane, and began making a 180 degree turn to proceed toward lower terrain. The
Page 468
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
ward lower terrain. The pilot of the first airplane radioed to the second pilot that he might want to turn around. The second
Page 469
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
turn around. The second pilot was already in a turn, and he asked the first pilot if he was turning around. The first pilot re
Page 470
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
around. The first pilot replied by stating, 'well, I'm kind of committed now.' That was the last radio contact with the pilot o
Page 471
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
o contact with the pilot of the first airplane. The second pilot proceeded over lower terrain to the lodge. The first airplane w
Page 472
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
dge. The first airplane was not there. The second pilot departed the lodge, searching for the first airplane. Near the mou
Page 473
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
airplane. Near the mountains, the ceilings were about 900 feet overcast. The second pilot said he could hear an ELT signa
Page 474
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
could hear an ELT signal near the mouth of a creek drainage. He could only get within about 5 miles of the pass. The acc
Page 475
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
iles of the pass. The accident airplane was reported overdue, but because of low clouds, a search helicopter was unable to
Page 476
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
helicopter was unable to reach the area of the mountain pass. The wreckage was spotted the following day, and two pass
Page 477
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
owing day, and two passengers in the rear seats were transported to medical facilities, but one passenger died before reac
Page 478
2000_GA_Annual_Review_Data
Page 479