Hypothesis H01: There is significant difference in occupational stress and job satis

Hypothesis H02: There is significant difference in coping mechanisms in the Emplo

Hypothesis H03: There is significant difference between work stressors (interperso
mechanisms of employees of different organizations and different work environm
 cupational stress and job satisfaction in the Employees.
ping mechanisms in the Employees.
ween work stressors (interpersonal conflict, workload, organizational constraints, and organizational injustice) and coping
s and different work environments.
and coping
Sr No Name Of Participant Name Of Org

1 Ms Monika Private Bank

2 Mr S Gera Samsung Call Centre
3 Ms A Narang BSNL Call Centre
4 Mr B Nehra
5 Mr A Saini
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
 85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
List of Orgs

Private Bank
Call Centres
 Organisation Average Score Stress OS-12
Fields
Sr No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Average Score Job Satisfaction JS 5 Average Score Coping Average Score Activity
Fields Strategies Scales
OS1 Role Overload OS 1
OS2 Role Ambiguity Sr No OSS FIELD
OS3 Role Conflict 1
Unreasonable group &
pol pressure
OS4 2
OS5 Responsibility of perosns 3
OS6 Under Participation 4
OS7 Powerlessness 5
OS8 Poor Peer Relations
Intrinsic Impoverishment
OS9
OS10 Low Status
Strenous Working
Conditions
OS11 OS 2
OS12 Unprofitability Sr No OSS FIELD
1
2
3
4
5
 ANOVA
CALCULATIONS

Avg Score Organization

Avg Score Organization

ANOVA MAJOR
FINDING

EQUAL NOT EQUAL

JSS FIELD 1
Sr No JSS FIELD Avg Score
1
2
3
4
5

JSS FIELD 2
Sr No JSS FIELD Avg Score
1
2
3
4
5
 ANOVA ANOVA MAJOR
CALCULATIONS FINDING

EQUAL NOT EQUAL

Organization

Organization
 CopingStrategy FIELD Avg Score
Sr No
1
2
3
4
5
 ANOVA ANOVA
CALCULATIONS MAJOR
FINDING

EQUAL NOT EQUAL

Organization
InterPersonalConflict Org Activities Avg Score
1
2
3
4
5

B Org Activities Avg Score

1
 ANOVA ANOVA
CALCULATIONS MAJOR
FINDING

EQUAL NOT EQUAL

Organization

Organization
Sr No Organisation OSS Hypo
1
2
3
4
5
 ANOVA ANOVA
CALCULATIONS MAJOR
FINDING

EQUAL
JSS Hypo CS Hypo LifeStyle Hypo
NOT EQUAL
Sample Calculations
30 cases from each Type
230 54 264
30 cases Organizational
from each environment LOW
Type FAVOURABLE Xa

H01 OSI JSS H02 OSI WOS H03 ORG - WOS

OSI JSS WOS Sr No

Sr No
1 185 36 145 31
2 183 40 185 32
3 200 44 143 33
4 179 42 155 34
5 177 40 144 35
6 169 47 142 36
7 171 50 132 37
8 170 50 143 38
9 150 49 177 39
10 155 49 179 40
11 145 48 155 41
12 180 43 180 42
13 172 43 190 43
14 174 46 185 44
15 145 48 175 45
16 164 33 176 46
17 165 33 170 47
18 177 38 165 48
19 188 35 170 49
20 199 44 144 50
21 200 35 117 51
22 202 35 197 52
23 135 50 132 53
24 149 47 178 54
25 155 47 177 55
26 144 42 173 56
27 143 43 172 57
28 123 41 189 58
29 142 42 179 59
30 149 39 190 60
Organizational Organizational
environment environment HIGH
MEDIUM FAVOURABLE Xc
FAVOURABLE Xb

OSI JSS WOS OSI JSS

137 47 220 61 150 47

130 42 225 62 160 40
125 41 230 63 170 41
129 46 235 64 180 46
120 44 196 65 164 44
119 45 221 66 144 45
140 42 225 67 155 40
145 39 220 68 160 45
139 38 198 69 165 38
136 42 221 70 157 42
138 43 225 71 159 43
139 46 222 72 169 46
141 45 211 73 170 45
121 44 233 74 155 44
118 44 199 75 166 44
119 41 215 76 166 41
120 42 235 77 168 42
135 40 231 78 180 40
133 40 222 79 154 40
143 42 221 80 143 42
136 43 229 81 134 43
112 45 226 82 123 45
119 49 209 83 155 49
149 48 227 84 165 48
146 35 206 85 175 41
111 34 216 86 200 41
127 36 211 87 201 40
127 36 210 88 203 40
121 37 109 89 190 40
137 38 200 90 180 40
WOS

220
235
223
229
221
229
275
270
211
229
229
230
233
233
231
232
240
245
225
250
255
234
200
200
200
200
222
221
226
226
Sample Calculations
30 cases from each Type
230 54 264
30 cases Organizational
from each environment LOW
Type FAVOURABLE Xa

H01 OSI JSS H02 OSI WOS H03 ORG - WOS

OSI JSS WOS Sr No

Sr No
1 185 36 145 31
2 183 40 185 32
3 200 44 143 33
4 179 42 155 34
5 177 40 144 35
6 169 47 142 36
7 171 50 132 37
8 170 50 143 38
9 150 49 177 39
10 155 49 179 40
11 145 48 155 41
12 180 43 180 42
13 172 43 190 43
14 174 46 185 44
15 145 48 175 45
16 164 33 176 46
17 165 33 170 47
18 177 38 165 48
19 188 35 170 49
20 199 44 144 50
21 200 35 117 51
22 202 35 197 52
23 135 50 132 53
24 149 47 178 54
25 155 47 177 55
26 144 42 173 56
27 143 43 172 57
28 123 41 189 58
29 142 42 179 59
30 149 39 190 60
Organizational Organizational
environment environment HIGH
MEDIUM FAVOURABLE Xc
FAVOURABLE Xb

OSI JSS WOS OSI JSS

137 47 220 61 150 47

130 42 225 62 160 40
125 41 230 63 170 41
129 46 235 64 180 46
120 44 196 65 164 44
119 45 221 66 144 45
140 42 225 67 155 40
145 39 220 68 160 45
139 38 198 69 165 38
136 42 221 70 157 42
138 43 225 71 159 43
139 46 222 72 169 46
141 45 211 73 170 45
121 44 233 74 155 44
118 44 199 75 166 44
119 41 215 76 166 41
120 42 235 77 168 42
135 40 231 78 180 40
133 40 222 79 154 40
143 42 221 80 143 42
136 43 229 81 134 43
112 45 226 82 123 45
119 49 209 83 155 49
149 48 227 84 165 48
146 35 206 85 175 41
111 34 216 86 200 41
127 36 211 87 201 40
127 36 210 88 203 40
121 37 109 89 190 40
137 38 200 90 180 40
WOS

220
235
223
229
221
229
275
270
211
229
229
230
233
233
231
232
240
245
225
250
255
234
200
200
200
200
222
221
226
226
Sample Calculations
30 cases from Each of Three Org Environment Situations as Low/Medium/High Favour
230 54
30 cases Organizational
from each environment Low
Type Fovour Xa

H01 OSI JSS H02 OSI WOS

Sr No OSI JSS

1 185 34225 36 1296

2 183 33489 40 1600
3 200 40000 44 1936
4 179 32041 42 1764
5 177 31329 40 1600
6 169 28561 47 2209
7 171 29241 50 2500
8 170 28900 50 2500
9 150 22500 49 2401
10 155 24025 49 2401
11 145 21025 48 2304
12 180 32400 43 1849
13 172 29584 43 1849
14 174 30276 46 2116
15 145 21025 48 2304
16 164 26896 33 1089
17 165 27225 33 1089
18 177 31329 38 1444
19 188 35344 35 1225
20 199 39601 44 1936
21 200 40000 35 1225
22 202 40804 35 1225
23 135 18225 50 2500
24 149 22201 47 2209
25 155 24025 47 2209
26 144 20736 42 1764
27 143 20449 43 1849
28 123 15129 41 1681
29 142 20164 42 1764
30 149 22201 39 1521
∑ Values 4990 842950 1279 55359
∑X1 ∑X1^2 ∑Y1 ∑Y1^2
MEAN 166.333333333333 42.6333333333

Sx 13863
 Correction
Term
Cx 2135364.1
SSt 51234.8999999999
830003.333333333 510124.8 820384.033333
SSa 25148.0666666664

SSw 26086.8333333335

MeanSSa 12574.0333333332
MeanSSw 299.848659003833 SDw 17.3161386863
SEDM SDw * Ö
4.46 (1/N1+1/N2)
F Ratio
(Calculated)
41.9345991911622

Source of SS MSS
Variance
F RATIO
Among Group 41.9345991912
2 25148.0666666664 12574.033333
Within Group
87 26086.8333333335 299.848659
Total 89
F Ratio
(Critical)
@α0.05
FROM TABLE 3.098
We are 95 %
confident that
OSI is
statistacally
not equal for
Three Org Env
Levels.

Fcalc>>Fc With 95% confidence , we cannot say that there is a N significant effect of Org
ritical Factors on OSI Values.

We are 95 % confident that WOC (Coping Strategies) is statistically not equal for Three Types of Org

Therefore the "Hypothesis WOC: There is significant difference between work stressors (interperso
mechanisms of employees of different organizations and different work environments. " is accepted

Same has been tested for OSI and JSS.

Comparison of the means of the various pairs of groups.

Comparison of the means of the various pairs of groups.

13.9818417639

t (X1 X2)

t (X1 X3) 0.37613488975

1.09649122807

t (Y1 Y2)

t (Y1 Y3) -0.1315789474

-13.165340407

t (Z1 Z2)

t (Z1 Z3) -16.931918656

 264
Organizational
environment
Medium Favour
Xb

H03 ORG - WOS

WOS Sr No OSI JSS

145 21025 31 137 18769 47

185 34225 32 130 16900 42
143 20449 33 125 15625 41
155 24025 34 129 16641 46
144 20736 35 120 14400 44
142 20164 36 119 14161 45
132 17424 37 140 19600 42
143 20449 38 145 21025 39
177 31329 39 139 19321 38
179 32041 40 136 18496 42
155 24025 41 138 19044 43
180 32400 42 139 19321 46
190 36100 43 141 19881 45
185 34225 44 121 14641 44
175 30625 45 118 13924 44
176 30976 46 119 14161 41
170 28900 47 120 14400 42
165 27225 48 135 18225 40
170 28900 49 133 17689 40
144 20736 50 143 20449 42
117 13689 51 136 18496 43
197 38809 52 112 12544 45
132 17424 53 119 14161 49
178 31684 54 149 22201 48
177 31329 55 146 21316 35
173 29929 56 111 12321 34
172 29584 57 127 16129 36
189 35721 58 127 16129 36
179 32041 59 121 14641 37
190 36100 60 137 18769 38
4959 832289 3912 513380 1254
∑Z1 ∑Z1^2 ∑X2 ∑X2^2 ∑Y2
165.3 130.4 41.8

Sy 3815
 Correction Term
Cy 161713.611111
SSt 1517.38888889
54528.0333333 52417.2 54784.133333
SSb 15.7555555555

SSw2 1501.63333333

MeanSSb 7.87777777777
MeanSSw2 17.2601532567 SDw2 4.1545340601
SEDM
0.76
F Ratio
(Calculated)
0.45641412684

Source of SSb MSS2

Variance
F RATIO
Among Group 0.4564141268
2 15.7555555555 7.877777778
Within Group
87 1501.63333333 17.26015326
Total 89
F Ratio (Critical)
@α0.05
FROM TABLE 3.098
We are 95 %
confident that JSS
is statistacally not
equal for Three
Org Env Levels

Fcalc>>Fcritical With 95% confidence , we cannot say that there is a N significant effect of Org
Factors on JSS Values.

t equal for Three Types of Org Env Levels as Low Favour/ Medium Favour/ High Favour.

en work stressors (interpersonal conflict, workload, organizational constraints, and organizational injustice) and coping
rk environments. " is accepted.
t at .05 level for Interpretation of
87df the Results
1.984 (Significant In comparison
at .05 level for to Cat1 and
87 df). Cat3, Cat 2 is
found to have
more Stress.

(Inignificant Cat 1 and Cat 3

at .05 level for are found to
87 df). have approx
equal values of
stress.
1.984

1.984 (Inignificant Cat 1 and Cat 2

at .05 level for are found to
87 df). have approx
equal values of
JSS.

(Inignificant Cat 1 and Cat 3

at .05 level for are found to
87 df). have approx
equal values of
JSS.
1.984

1.984 (Significant In comparison

at .05 level for to Cat1 and
87 df). Cat3, Cat 3 is
found to have
more CS.

(Significant In comparison
at .05 level for to Cat1 and
87 df). Cat3, Cat 2 is
found to have
less CS.
1.984
 Organizational
environment High
Favour Xc

WOS OSI JSS

2209 220 48400 61 150 22500 47

1764 225 50625 62 160 25600 40
1681 230 52900 63 170 28900 41
2116 235 55225 64 180 32400 46
1936 196 38416 65 164 26896 44
2025 221 48841 66 144 20736 45
1764 225 50625 67 155 24025 40
1521 220 48400 68 160 25600 45
1444 198 39204 69 165 27225 38
1764 221 48841 70 157 24649 42
1849 225 50625 71 159 25281 43
2116 222 49284 72 169 28561 46
2025 211 44521 73 170 28900 45
1936 233 54289 74 155 24025 44
1936 199 39601 75 166 27556 44
1681 215 46225 76 166 27556 41
1764 235 55225 77 168 28224 42
1600 231 53361 78 180 32400 40
1600 222 49284 79 154 23716 40
1764 221 48841 80 143 20449 42
1849 229 52441 81 134 17956 43
2025 226 51076 82 123 15129 45
2401 209 43681 83 155 24025 49
2304 227 51529 84 165 27225 48
1225 206 42436 85 175 30625 41
1156 216 46656 86 200 40000 41
1296 211 44521 87 201 40401 40
1296 210 44100 88 203 41209 40
1369 109 11881 89 190 36100 40
1444 200 40000 90 180 32400 40
52860 6448 1401054 4961 830269 1282
∑Y2^2 ∑Z2 ∑Z2^2 ∑X3 ∑X3^2 ∑Y3
214.93333333 165.366666666667 42.7333333333

Sz 18281
 Correction
Term
Cz 3713277.34444444
SSt 104541.655555556
819722.7 1385890.1333 1575062.53333
SSc 67398.0222222218

SSw3 37143.6333333338

MeanSSc 33699.0111111109
MeanSSw3 426.93831417625 SDw3 20.6639783198
SEDM
3.77
F Ratio
(Calculated)
78.9318034764131

Source of SSc MSS2

Variance
F RATIO
Among Group 78.9318034764
2 67398.0222222218 33699.011111
Within Group
87 37143.6333333338 426.93831418
Total 89
F Ratio
(Critical)
@α0.05
FROM TABLE 3.098
We are 95 %
confident that
WOC is
statistacally
not equal for
Three Org Env
Levels .

Fcalc>>>Fcritic With 95% confidence , we cannot say that there is a N significant effect of Org
al Factors on WOC Values.

tice) and coping

 WOS
CODE 1
2209 220 48400
1600 235 55225
1681 223 49729
2116 229 52441
1936 221 48841
2025 229 52441
1600 275 75625
2025 270 72900
1444 211 44521
1764 229 52441
1849 229 52441
2116 230 52900
2025 233 54289
1936 233 54289
1936 231 53361
1681 232 53824
1764 240 57600
1600 245 60025
1600 225 50625
1764 250 62500
1849 255 65025
2025 234 54756
2401 200 40000
2304 200 40000
1681 200 40000
1681 200 40000
1600 222 49284
1600 221 48841
1600 226 51076
1600 226 51076
55012 6874 1584476
∑Y3^2 ∑Z3 ∑Z3^2
229.133333333
Sample Calculations
X-Y
230 54 264
All 90 X Y Z
Cases

H01 OSI JSS H02 OSI WOS H03 ORG - WOS -

NOT USED
OSI JSS WOS

Sr No
1 185 36 145 149
2 183 40 185 143
3 200 44 143 156
4 179 42 155 137
5 177 40 144 137
6 169 47 142 122
7 171 50 132 121
8 170 50 143 120
9 150 49 177 101
10 155 49 179 106
11 145 48 155 97
12 180 43 180 137
13 172 43 190 129
14 174 46 185 128
15 145 48 175 97
16 164 33 176 131
17 165 33 170 132
18 177 38 165 139
19 188 35 170 153
20 199 44 144 155
21 200 35 117 165
22 202 35 197 167
23 135 50 132 85
24 149 47 178 102
25 155 47 177 108
26 144 42 173 102
27 143 43 172 100
28 123 41 189 82
29 142 42 179 100
30 149 39 190 110
31 137 47 220 90
32 130 42 225 88
33 125 41 230 84
34 129 46 235 83
35 120 44 196 76
36 119 45 221 74
37 140 42 225 98
38 145 39 220 106
39 139 38 198 101
40 136 42 221 94
41 138 43 225 95
42 139 46 222 93
43 141 45 211 96
44 121 44 233 77
45 118 44 199 74
46 119 41 215 78
47 120 42 235 78
48 135 40 231 95
49 133 40 222 93
50 143 42 221 101
51 136 43 229 93
52 112 45 226 67
53 119 49 209 70
54 149 48 227 101
55 146 35 206 111
56 111 34 216 77
57 127 36 211 91
58 127 36 210 91
59 121 37 109 84
60 137 38 200 99
61 150 47 220 103
62 160 40 235 120
63 170 41 223 129
64 180 46 229 134
65 164 44 221 120
66 144 45 229 99
67 155 40 275 115
68 160 45 270 115
69 165 38 211 127
70 157 42 229 115
71 159 43 229 116
72 169 46 230 123
73 170 45 233 125
74 155 44 233 111
 75 166 44 231 122
76 166 41 232 125
77 168 42 240 126
78 180 40 245 140
79 154 40 225 114
80 143 42 250 101
81 134 43 255 91
82 123 45 234 78
83 155 49 200 106
84 165 48 200 117
85 175 41 200 134
86 200 41 200 159
87 201 40 222 161
88 203 40 221 163
89 190 40 226 150
90 180 40 226 140
10048

∑D/N (∑D)^2/N
111.64444444444 1121803.37778
N(N-1) 8010 2.62691870837

t value
calculated
42.5001520179

df=89 t value critical α=0.05 1.664

α=0.01 2.374
tcalculated >> ttabulated => Reject Ho and conclude that there is a statistically significant
difference between the mean of sample and population mean, and this difference is unlikely
due to chance.

Therefore the "Hypothesis H01: There is significant difference in occupational stress and job
satisfaction in the Employees." , is accepted.
(X-Y)^2 X-Z (X-Z)^2

Hypothesis H01:
There is significant
difference in
occupational stress
and job satisfaction
in the Employees.

22201 40 1600
20449 -2 4
24336 57 3249
18769 24 576
18769 33 1089
14884 27 729
14641 39 1521
14400 27 729
10201 -27 729
11236 -24 576
9409 -10 100
18769 0 0
16641 -18 324
16384 -11 121
9409 -30 900
17161 -12 144
17424 -5 25
19321 12 144
23409 18 324
24025 55 3025
27225 83 6889
27889 5 25
7225 3 9
10404 -29 841
11664 -22 484
10404 -29 841
10000 -29 841
6724 -66 4356
10000 -37 1369
12100 -41 1681
8100 -83 6889
7744 -95 9025
7056 -105 11025
6889 -106 11236
5776 -76 5776
5476 -102 10404
9604 -85 7225
11236 -75 5625
10201 -59 3481
8836 -85 7225
9025 -87 7569
8649 -83 6889
9216 -70 4900
5929 -112 12544
5476 -81 6561
6084 -96 9216
6084 -115 13225
9025 -96 9216
8649 -89 7921
10201 -78 6084
8649 -93 8649
4489 -114 12996
4900 -90 8100
10201 -78 6084
12321 -60 3600
5929 -105 11025
8281 -84 7056
8281 -83 6889
7056 12 144
9801 -63 3969
10609 -70 4900
14400 -75 5625
16641 -53 2809
17956 -49 2401
14400 -57 3249
9801 -85 7225
13225 -120 14400
13225 -110 12100
16129 -46 2116
13225 -72 5184
13456 -70 4900
15129 -61 3721
15625 -63 3969
12321 -78 6084
 14884 -65 4225
15625 -66 4356
15876 -72 5184
19600 -65 4225
12996 -71 5041
10201 -107 11449
8281 -121 14641
6084 -111 12321
11236 -45 2025
13689 -35 1225
17956 -25 625
25281 0 0
25921 -21 441
26569 -18 324
22500 -36 1296
19600 -46 2116
1177078 -4418 411970

(∑D)^2 - (∑D)^2/N ∑D/N (∑D)^2/N

55274.6222222222 -49.0888888888889 216874.711111
N(N-1) 8010 4.93522699875

t value
calculated
-9.9466324247

t value
critical
df=89 α=0.05 1.664
α=0.01 2.374
tically significant tcalculated > ttabulated => Reject Ho and conclude that there is a statistically signific
difference is unlikely difference between the mean of sample and population mean, and this difference is
due to chance.

tional stress and job Therefor the "Hypothesis H02: There is significant difference in coping mechanisms i
Employees." is accepted.
 (∑D)^2 - (∑D)^2/N
195095.2888889

t there is a statistically significant

n mean, and this difference is unlikely

rence in coping mechanisms in the

Sample Calculations pearson Corelation

230
All 90 X
Cases
H01 OSI JSS

OSI X X-X'

Sr No
1 185 31 961
2 183 29 841
3 200 46 2116
4 179 25 625
5 177 23 529
6 169 15 225
7 171 17 289
8 170 16 256
9 150 -4 16
10 155 1 1
11 145 -9 81
12 180 26 676
13 172 18 324
14 174 20 400
15 145 -9 81
16 164 10 100
17 165 11 121
18 177 23 529
19 188 34 1156
20 199 45 2025
21 200 46 2116
22 202 48 2304
23 135 -19 361
24 149 -5 25
25 155 1 1
26 144 -10 100
27 143 -11 121
28 123 -31 961
29 142 -12 144
30 149 -5 25
31 137 -17 289
32 130 -24 576
33 125 -29 841
34 129 -25 625
35 120 -34 1156
36 119 -35 1225
37 140 -14 196
38 145 -9 81
39 139 -15 225
40 136 -18 324
41 138 -16 256
42 139 -15 225
43 141 -13 169
44 121 -33 1089
45 118 -36 1296
46 119 -35 1225
47 120 -34 1156
48 135 -19 361
49 133 -21 441
50 143 -11 121
51 136 -18 324
52 112 -42 1764
53 119 -35 1225
54 149 -5 25
55 146 -8 64
56 111 -43 1849
57 127 -27 729
58 127 -27 729
59 121 -33 1089
60 137 -17 289
61 150 -4 16
62 160 6 36
63 170 16 256
64 180 26 676
65 164 10 100
66 144 -10 100
67 155 1 1
68 160 6 36
69 165 11 121
70 157 3 9
71 159 5 25
72 169 15 225
73 170 16 256
74 155 1 1
75 166 12 144
76 166 12 144
77 168 14 196
78 180 26 676
79 154 0 0
80 143 -11 121
 81 134 -20 400
82 123 -31 961
83 155 1 1
84 165 11 121
85 175 21 441
86 200 46 2116
87 201 47 2209
88 203 49 2401
89 190 36 1296
90 180 26 676
∑X/90 ∑(X-X')^2
Mean 154.033333333333 51235

Sx = Ö(∑(X-X')^2) / N 23.8595426984211

Sy = Ö(∑(Y-Y')^2) / N 4.1060781504713

Sz = Ö(∑(Z-Z')^2) / N 34.0820904418859

r=∑(X-X')(Y-Y')/
rXY N*Sx*Sy -0.143034827143566
0.97954103822401
r=∑(X-X')(Z-Z')/
rXZ N*Sx*SZ -0.244047813427778
0.94044066476112
r=∑(Y-Y')(Z-Z')/
rYZ N*Sy*SZ -0.004548653731903
0.999979309749227
rCRITICAL for df n-2 i.e. 88 0.205 at 0.05 SL 2
tailed

As the correlation coefficient moves nearer to + 1 or – 1, the strength of relationship between the two variables
increases.

Note on Correlation and Causality:-

The correlation does not necessarily imply causality. But, if the correlation between two variables is high then it m
indicate the causality. If X and Y are correlated, then there are three different ways in which the relationship betw
two variables can be understood in terms of causality.
1) X is a cause of Y.
2) Y is cause of X.
3) Both, X and Y are caused by another variable Z.
However, causality can be inferred from the correlations.
Regression analysis, path analysis, structural equation modeling, are some examples
where correlations are employed in order to understand causality.
where correlations are employed in order to understand causality.
 54 264
Y Z

H02 OSI WOS H03 ORG - WOS -

NOT USED
JSS Y Y-Y' WOS Z Z-Z'

36 -6.39 40.8321 145 -58 3364

40 -2.39 5.7121 185 -18 324
44 1.61 2.5921 143 -60 3600
42 -0.39 0.1521 155 -48 2304
40 -2.39 5.7121 144 -59 3481
47 4.61 21.2521 142 -61 3721
50 7.61 57.9121 132 -71 5041
50 7.61 57.9121 143 -60 3600
49 6.61 43.6921 177 -26 676
49 6.61 43.6921 179 -24 576
48 5.61 31.4721 155 -48 2304
43 0.61 0.3721 180 -23 529
43 0.61 0.3721 190 -13 169
46 3.61 13.0321 185 -18 324
48 5.61 31.4721 175 -28 784
33 -9.39 88.1721 176 -27 729
33 -9.39 88.1721 170 -33 1089
38 -4.39 19.2721 165 -38 1444
35 -7.39 54.6121 170 -33 1089
44 1.61 2.5921 144 -59 3481
35 -7.39 54.6121 117 -86 7396
35 -7.39 54.6121 197 -6 36
50 7.61 57.9121 132 -71 5041
47 4.61 21.2521 178 -25 625
47 4.61 21.2521 177 -26 676
42 -0.39 0.1521 173 -30 900
43 0.61 0.3721 172 -31 961
41 -1.39 1.9321 189 -14 196
42 -0.39 0.1521 179 -24 576
39 -3.39 11.4921 190 -13 169
47 4.61 21.2521 220 17 289
42 -0.39 0.1521 225 22 484
41 -1.39 1.9321 230 27 729
46 3.61 13.0321 235 32 1024
44 1.61 2.5921 196 -7 49
45 2.61 6.8121 221 18 324
42 -0.39 0.1521 225 22 484
39 -3.39 11.4921 220 17 289
38 -4.39 19.2721 198 -5 25
42 -0.39 0.1521 221 18 324
43 0.61 0.3721 225 22 484
46 3.61 13.0321 222 19 361
45 2.61 6.8121 211 8 64
44 1.61 2.5921 233 30 900
44 1.61 2.5921 199 -4 16
41 -1.39 1.9321 215 12 144
42 -0.39 0.1521 235 32 1024
40 -2.39 5.7121 231 28 784
40 -2.39 5.7121 222 19 361
42 -0.39 0.1521 221 18 324
43 0.61 0.3721 229 26 676
45 2.61 6.8121 226 23 529
49 6.61 43.6921 209 6 36
48 5.61 31.4721 227 24 576
35 -7.39 54.6121 206 3 9
34 -8.39 70.3921 216 13 169
36 -6.39 40.8321 211 8 64
36 -6.39 40.8321 210 7 49
37 -5.39 29.0521 109 -94 8836
38 -4.39 19.2721 200 -3 9
47 4.61 21.2521 220 17 289
40 -2.39 5.7121 235 32 1024
41 -1.39 1.9321 223 20 400
46 3.61 13.0321 229 26 676
44 1.61 2.5921 221 18 324
45 2.61 6.8121 229 26 676
40 -2.39 5.7121 275 72 5184
45 2.61 6.8121 270 67 4489
38 -4.39 19.2721 211 8 64
42 -0.39 0.1521 229 26 676
43 0.61 0.3721 229 26 676
46 3.61 13.0321 230 27 729
45 2.61 6.8121 233 30 900
44 1.61 2.5921 233 30 900
44 1.61 2.5921 231 28 784
41 -1.39 1.9321 232 29 841
42 -0.39 0.1521 240 37 1369
40 -2.39 5.7121 245 42 1764
40 -2.39 5.7121 225 22 484
42 -0.39 0.1521 250 47 2209
 43 0.61 0.3721 255 52 2704
45 2.61 6.8121 234 31 961
49 6.61 43.6921 200 -3 9
48 5.61 31.4721 200 -3 9
41 -1.39 1.9321 200 -3 9
41 -1.39 1.9321 200 -3 9
40 -2.39 5.7121 222 19 361
40 -2.39 5.7121 221 18 324
40 -2.39 5.7121 226 23 529
40 -2.39 5.7121 226 23 529
∑Y/90 ∑(Y-Y')^2 ∑Z/90 ∑(Z-Z')^2
42.3888888889 1517.389 203.12222222222 104543

N-1/N-2 1.01136363636

radj 0.09658060682
0.99067218639
Because the obtained (i.e., calculated) correlation value of -0.143 is > than c
0.22107127697 there is no correlation between OSI and JSS in the population.
0.9511274905

r adjusted = unbiased estimate of population correlation coefficient for XY =

Err:502 r adjusted = unbiased estimate of population correlation coefficient for XZ -
1.011342711

tionship between the two variables

Analyse:- The null Hypothesis is rejected. Therefore the "Hypothesis H01: Th

etween two variables is high then it might difference in occupational stress and job satisfaction in the Employees." , is a
t ways in which the relationship between
The null Hypothesis is accepted. "Hypothesis H02: There is significant differ
mechanisms in the Employees." is rejected.

xamples
(X-X')(Y-Y') (X-X')(Z-Z') (Y-Y')(Z-Z')

-198.09 -1798 370.62

-69.31 -522 43.02
74.06 -2760 -96.6
-9.75 -1200 18.72
-54.97 -1357 141.01
69.15 -915 -281.21
129.37 -1207 -540.31
121.76 -960 -456.6
-26.44 104 -171.86
6.61 -24 -158.64
-50.49 432 -269.28
15.86 -598 -14.03
10.98 -234 -7.93
72.2 -360 -64.98
-50.49 252 -157.08
-93.9 -270 253.53
-103.29 -363 309.87
-100.97 -874 166.82
-251.26 -1122 243.87
72.45 -2655 -94.99
-339.94 -3956 635.54
-354.72 -288 44.34
-144.59 1349 -540.31
-23.05 125 -115.25
4.61 -26 -119.86
3.90000000000001 300 11.7
-6.71 341 -18.91
43.09 434 19.46
4.68000000000001 288 9.36
16.95 65 44.07
-78.37 -289 78.37
9.36000000000001 -528 -8.58
40.31 -783 -37.53
-90.25 -800 115.52
-54.74 238 -11.27
 -91.35 -630 46.98
5.46000000000001 -308 -8.58
30.51 -153 -57.63
65.85 75 21.95
7.02000000000001 -324 -7.02
-9.76 -352 13.42
-54.15 -285 68.59
-33.93 -104 20.88
-53.13 -990 48.3
-57.96 144 -6.44
48.65 -420 -16.68
13.26 -1088 -12.48
45.41 -532 -66.92
50.19 -399 -45.41
4.29000000000001 -198 -7.02
-10.98 -468 15.86
-109.62 -966 60.03
-231.35 -210 39.66
-28.05 -120 134.64
59.12 -24 -22.17
360.77 -559 -109.07
172.53 -216 -51.12
172.53 -189 -44.73
177.87 3102 506.66
74.63 51 13.17
-18.44 -68 78.37
-14.34 192 -76.48
-22.24 320 -27.8
93.86 676 93.86
16.1 180 28.98
-26.1 -260 67.86
-2.39 72 -172.08
15.66 402 174.87
-48.29 88 -35.12
-1.17 78 -10.14
3.05 130 15.86
54.15 405 97.47
41.76 480 78.3
1.61 30 48.3
19.32 336 45.08
-16.68 348 -40.31
-5.46 518 -14.43
-62.14 1092 -100.38
0 0 -52.58
4.29000000000001 -517 -18.33
 -12.2 -1040 31.72
-80.91 -961 80.91
6.61 -3 -19.83
61.71 -33 -16.83
-29.19 -63 4.17
-63.94 -138 4.17
-112.33 893 -45.41
-117.11 882 -43.02
-86.04 828 -54.97
-62.14 598 -54.97
∑(X-X')(Y-Y') ∑(X-X')(Z-Z') ∑(Y-Y')(Z-Z')
-1261.17 -17861 -57.29

rrelation value of -0.143 is > than critical (i.e., tabled) value, we reject the null hypothesis that
SS in the population.

tion correlation coefficient for XY = 0.096

tion correlation coefficient for XZ - 0.22

Therefore the "Hypothesis H01: There is significant

satisfaction in the Employees." , is accepted.

esis H02: There is significant difference in coping

d.
 1-90
FINDING RANK
RANK OPTIONS

Sr No OSI X Rank X
1 185 80 34225
2 183 79 33489
3 200 85 40000
4 179 74 32041
5 177 72.5 31329
6 169 62.5 28561
7 171 68 29241
8 170 65 28900
9 150 40.5 22500
10 155 47 24025
11 145 34 21025
12 180 76.5 32400
13 172 69 29584
14 174 70 30276
15 145 34 21025
16 164 54.5 26896
17 165 57 27225
18 177 72.5 31329
19 188 81 35344
20 199 83 39601
21 200 85 40000
22 202 88 40804
23 135 19.5 18225
24 149 38 22201
25 155 47 24025
26 144 31.5 20736
27 143 29 20449
28 123 11.5 15129
29 142 27 20164
30 149 38 22201
31 137 23.5 18769
32 130 17 16900
33 125 13 15625

34 129 16 16641
35 120 7.5 14400
36 119 5 14161
37 140 25 19600
38 145 34 21025
39 139 23.5 19321
40 136 21.5 18496
41 138 22 19044
42 139 23.5 19321
43 141 25 19881
44 121 9.5 14641
45 118 3 13924
46 119 5 14161
47 120 7.5 14400
48 135 19.5 18225
49 133 17 17689
50 143 29 20449
51 136 21.5 18496
52 112 2 12544
53 119 5 14161
54 149 38 22201
55 146 36 21316
56 111 1 12321
57 127 14.5 16129
58 127 14.5 16129
59 121 9.5 14641
60 137 23.5 18769
61 150 40.5 22500
62 160 52.5 25600
63 170 65 28900
64 180 76.5 32400
65 164 54.5 26896
66 144 31.5 20736
67 155 47 24025
68 160 52.5 25600
69 165 57 27225
70 157 50 24649
71 159 51 25281
72 169 62.5 28561
73 170 65 28900
74 155 47 24025
75 166 59.5 27556
76 166 59.5 27556
77 168 61 28224
78 180 76.5 32400
79 154 42 23716
80 143 29 20449
81 134 18 17956
82 123 11.5 15129
83 155 47 24025
84 165 57 27225
85 175 71 30625
86 200 85 40000
87 201 87 40401
88 203 89 41209
89 190 82 36100
90 180 76.5 32400
13863 2186599
JSS Y Rank Y D=Rx-Ry D^2
36 83 1296 -3 9 6660
40 68.5 1600 10.5 110.25 7320
44 32.5 1936 52.5 2756.25 8800
42 50 1764 24 576 7518
40 68.5 1600 4 16 7080
47 14 2209 48.5 2352.25 7943
50 2 2500 66 4356 8550
50 2 2500 63 3969 8500
49 5.5 2401 35 1225 7350
49 5.5 2401 41.5 1722.25 7595
48 10 2304 24 576 6960
43 40 1849 36.5 1332.25 7740
43 4 1849 65 4225 7396
46 19 2116 51 2601 8004
48 10 2304 24 576 6960
33 90 1089 -35.5 1260.25 5412
33 90 1089 -33 1089 5445
38 78.5 1444 -6 36 6726
35 86.5 1225 -5.5 30.25 6580
44 32.5 1936 50.5 2550.25 8756
35 86.5 1225 -1.5 2.25 7000
35 86.5 1225 1.5 2.25 7070
50 2 2500 17.5 306.25 6750
47 14 2209 24 576 7003
47 14 2209 33 1089 7285
42 50 1764 -18.5 342.25 6048
43 40 1849 -11 121 6149
41 59 1681 -47.5 2256.25 5043
42 50 1764 -23 529 5964
39 75.5 1521 -37.5 1406.25 5811
47 14 2209 9.5 90.25 6439
42 50 1764 -33 1089 5460
41 59 1681
-46 2116 5125
46 19 2116 -3 9 5934
44 32.5 1936 -25 625 5280
45 25 2025 -20 400 5355
42 50 1764 -25 625 5880
39 75.5 1521 -41.5 1722.25 5655
38 78.5 1444 -55 3025 5282
42 50 1764 -28.5 812.25 5712
43 40 1849 -18 324 5934
46 19 2116 4.5 20.25 6394
45 25 2025 0 0 6345
44 32.5 1936 -23 529 5324
44 32.5 1936 -29.5 870.25 5192
41 59 1681 -54 2916 4879
42 50 1764 -42.5 1806.25 5040
40 68.5 1600 -49 2401 5400
40 68.5 1600 -51.5 2652.25 5320
42 50 1764 -21 441 6006
43 40 1849 -18.5 342.25 5848
45 25 2025 -23 529 5040
49 5.5 2401 -0.5 0.25 5831
48 10 2304 28 784 7152
35 86.5 1225 -50.5 2550.25 5110
34 89 1156 -88 7744 3774
36 83 1296 -68.5 4692.25 4572
36 83 1296 -68.5 4692.25 4572
37 81 1369 -71.5 5112.25 4477
38 78.5 1444 -55 3025 5206
47 14 2209 26.5 702.25 7050
40 68.5 1600 -16 256 6400
41 59 1681 6 36 6970
46 19 2116 57.5 3306.25 8280
44 32.5 1936 22 484 7216
45 25 2025 6.5 42.25 6480
40 68.5 1600 -21.5 462.25 6200
45 25 2025 27.5 756.25 7200
38 78.5 1444 -21.5 462.25 6270
42 50 1764 0 0 6594
43 40 1849 11 121 6837
46 19 2116 43.5 1892.25 7774
45 25 2025 40 1600 7650
44 32.5 1936 14.5 210.25 6820
44 32.5 1936 27 729 7304
41 59 1681 0.5 0.25 6806
42 50 1764 11 121 7056
40 68.5 1600 8 64 7200
40 68.5 1600 -26.5 702.25 6160
42 50 1764 -21 441 6006
43 40 1849 -22 484 5762
45 25 2025 -13.5 182.25 5535
49 5.5 2401 41.5 1722.25 7595
48 8.5 2304 48.5 2352.25 7920
41 59 1681 12 144 7175
41 59 1681 26 676 8200
40 68.5 1600 18.5 342.25 8040
40 68.5 1600 20.5 420.25 8120
40 68.5 1600 13.5 182.25 7600
40 68.5 1600 8 64 7200
3815 163231 108901.8 586376
rs is VERY near to zero, then there is low
stregnth or weak relationship between X and
Y.

Spearman’s rho. ∑D^2 108901.8 653410.5 728910

1-(6*∑D^2/n(n^2-1) 0.896421
0.103578631106721

Spearman’s rho.
0.103578631106721

∑X 13863
∑Y 3815
∑X^2 2186599
∑Y^2 163231
∑XY 586376

{N*∑XY}-{∑Y^2*∑Y}/ {(N*∑X^2 )-∑Y^2} beta 1

{∑Y*∑X^2- ∑X*∑XY} / N*∑X^2-∑Y^2 beta 0

212944697
196630679

-569952425
196630679

beta 1 -2.898594
beta 0 1.082968

REGRESSION EQUATION
Y= 1.08X-2.90
JSS = 1.08 * OS -2.90 + e1

Having X Predicting Y
e = error in prediction of the scores on Y
variable, or residual
Comments