0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views15 pages

CH 5

This document discusses the concept of generalized inverses, specifically γ-inverses, in the context of k-idempotent fuzzy matrices. It explores the properties and characterizations of these inverses, including the existence of least square and minimum norm γ-inverses, and presents various theorems and examples related to idempotent zκ matrices. The findings highlight the significance of these inverses in applications such as control theory and signal processing.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views15 pages

CH 5

This document discusses the concept of generalized inverses, specifically γ-inverses, in the context of k-idempotent fuzzy matrices. It explores the properties and characterizations of these inverses, including the existence of least square and minimum norm γ-inverses, and presents various theorems and examples related to idempotent zκ matrices. The findings highlight the significance of these inverses in applications such as control theory and signal processing.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15

5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent

Fuzzy Matrices

In matrix Algebra, the concept of generalized inverse presents a very inter-


esting area of research. The generalized inverse (g−inverse or γ−inverse)is a
generalization of the inverse of matrix for either singular or a non-square matrix.
The γ−inverse has innumerable applications in control theory, robotics, singnal
processing and associative memories. Generalized inverses of a m × n matrix A
over a field F is a n×m matrix G over F such that GB is a solution of the system
AX = B of linear equations whenever B is such that this system is consistent.
Conventionally, a γ−inverse of A is denoted by A− .

However this fails for a fuzzy matrix, that is, for A ∈ Fmn under the max-
min fuzzy operations, the matrix equation AXA = A need not have a solution
X. If A has a generalized inverse (γ−inverse), then A is said to be regular.

This chapter is a detailed discussion of various γ−inverses assoiciated


with a regular matrix and obtain characterization of the set of all γ−inverses for
idempotent zκ matrices. It is found that the square of an idempotent zκ matrix
behaves as a inverse for various inverses. Also, it has been discussed that some
of the inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix is also κ− idempotent.

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 55


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

5.1 Generalized inverse of idempotent zκ Matrices

In this section, a γ−inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix A is found. Moreover,


Some fundamental results are derived and some basic properties using idempo-
tent zκ matrix have been obtained.

Definition 5.1.1 For A ∈ Fnk , A− −


k is said to be a γ−inverse of A if AAk A = A

for all A−
k ∈ A{1}.

 
1 0.5
Example 5.1.2 Let A = ∈ Fn2 and the γ−inverse is given by
0.5 1
 
− 0.5 1
Ak = such that
1 0
   
− 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5
AAk A =
0.5 1 1 0 0.5 1
 
1 0.5
= = A.
0.5 1

Theorem 5.1.3 If A− k 2
k is a γ−inverse of A ∈ Fn , then γ−inverse of A is

KA−
k K.

Proof A2 (KA− 2 2 −
k K)A = A KAk KA
2

= KAA−
k AK

= KAK

= A2 .

Therefore, KA− 2
k K ∈ A {1}.

Proposition 5.1.4 If A− k −
k is a γ−inverse of A ∈ Fn , then Ak K = KA and

KA−
k = AK.

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 56


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

Proof KA[A− −
k K]KA = KAAk A

= KA

AK[KA− −
k ]AK = AAk AK

= AK.

Proposition 5.1.5 If A− k 3 − −
k is a γ−inverse of A ∈ Fn , then A = AAk = Ak A.

Proof A3 (AA− 3 3 −
k )A = A AAk AA
2

= A3 AA2

= (A3 )2

= A3 .

Lemma 5.1.6 If A ∈ Fnk , then A2 ∈ A{1}.

Proof AA2 A = A4

that is AA2 A = A.

Thus A2 is the γ−inverse of A.

Theorem 5.1.7 Let A ∈ Fnk and X ∈ A{1}, then AX and XA are idempotent
zκ matrices.

Proof Consider, K(AX)2 K = K(AX)(AX)K

= K(AXA)XK

= KAKX

= A2 X

= AX.

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 57


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

Also, K(XA)2 K = K(XA)(XA)K

= KX(AXA)K

= XKAK

= XA2

= XA.

Hence, AX and XA are idempotent zκ matrices.

   
1 0 1 1
Example 5.1.8 If A = then there exists a X = ∈ A{1} such
0 0 1 0
that AXA = A.
   
1 1 1 0
Here AX = and XA =
0 0 1 0
    
2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
Also K(AX) K =
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
 
1 1
= = AX
0 0
    
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1
and K(XA)2 K =
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
 
1 0
= = XA
1 0
therefore, AX and XA are κ−idempotent.

Definition 5.1.9 For a subspace W of Vn , if (Vn )X = W where X is the idem-


potent zκ matrix then W is retract of Vn .

Lemma 5.1.10 For A ∈ Fn , A is regular fuzzy matrix if, and only if there exists
an idempotent zκ matrix H such that R(H) = R(A).

Lemma 5.1.11 For A ∈ Fn , there exists an idempotent zκ matrix H such that


ρ(H) = ρ(A) if, and only if A is a regular fuzzy matrix.

Theorem 5.1.12 R(A) is a retract of Vn if, and only if A is regular.

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 58


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

Proof Consider R(A) = (Vn )X.

We have X is κ− idempotent.

By Lemma 5.1.10, A is regular.

Conversely, Consider A as regular.

Then there exists an κ−idempotent X.

Therefore R(X) = R(A) with KX 2 K = X.

Hence R(A) = (Vn )X.

Definition 5.1.13 For A ∈ Fn , there exists a semi γ−inverse X for A such


that AXA = A and XAX = X for all X ∈ A{1, 2}.

Theorem 5.1.14 If A ∈ Fnk , then A2 is both γ−inverse and semi γ−inverse


of A.

Proof By Lemma 5.1.6, A2 ∈ A{1}.

Now, A2 AA2 = A5

=A

Therefore A2 ∈ A{1, 2}.

5.2 µ−Penrose inverse of idemotent zκ matrices

In this section, with the existence of least square γ−inverse and minimum norm
γ−inverse, µ− penrose inverse for idempotent zκ matrix are found. A nec-
essary condition for the µ−Penrose inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix to be
k−idempotent is also derived.

Definition 5.2.1 For an idempotent zκ matrix A, a matrix G is called least


square γ−inverse of A if AGA = A and (AG)T = AG for all X ∈ A{1, 3}.

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 59


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

Definition 5.2.2 For an idempotent zκ matrix A, a matrix G is called mini-


mum norm γ−inverse of A if AGA = A and (GA)T = GA for all X ∈ A{1, 4}.

By Theorem 5.1.3, we will get the following results obviously.

(1,3)
Theorem 5.2.3 If Ak is a {1, 3}−inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix A,
(1,3) (1,3)
then [A2 ]k = KAk K.

(1,4)
Theorem 5.2.4 If Ak is a {1, 4}−inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix A,
(1,4) (1,4)
then [A2 ]k = KAk K.

Definition 5.2.5 For an idempotent zκ matrix A, if the fuzzy matrix P is both


{1, 3}−inverse and {1, 4}−inverse , then P is called µ− Penrose inverse of A
which is denoted as A+
k.

By combining the Theorems 5.1.3, 5.2.3 and 5.2.4, we easily prove the
following theorem.

Theorem 5.2.6 If A+
k is a µ− Penrose inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix A,

then the µ− Penrose inverse of A2 is KA+


k K.

Theorem 5.2.7 If A ∈ Fnk , then (A3 )+


k commutes with the κ−permuted matrix

K.

Proof If A is an idempotent zκ matrix, then KA = AK

KA3 = A3 K

(KA3 )+ 3 +
k = (A K)k

Kk+ (A3 )+ 3 + +
k = (A )k Kk

K(A3 )+ 3 +
k = (A )k K .

Theorem 5.2.8 If A ∈ Fnk , then A+ k


k ∈ Fn also.

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 60


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

Proof We have

A2 (A+ 2 2 + +
k ) A = (AA)(Ak Ak )(AA)

= (AAA+ +
k )(Ak AA)

= AA+ +
k A.AAk A

= AA
= A. (5.1)

and (A+ 2 2 + 2 + + + +
k ) A (Ak ) = (Ak Ak )(AA)(Ak Ak )

= (A+ + + +
k Ak A)(AAk Ak )

= (A+ + + +
k AAk )(Ak AAk )

= A+ +
k Ak

= (A+ 2
k) . (5.2)

From equation 5.1 and 5.2, we have

(A2 )+ + 2
k = (Ak )

Now A+ 2 +
k = (KA K)k

= K(A2 )+
kK

= K(A+ 2
k ) K.

Hence A+
k is idempotent zκ matrix.

By Definition 5.2.5, we directly observe the following theorem.

Theorem 5.2.9 If A ∈ Fnk and A+ T


k exists, then A ∈ A{1}

Theorem 5.2.10 If every α−section of A ∈ Fnk has µ−Penrose inverse, then


AT is a µ−Penrose inverse of A.

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 61


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

Proof Let Aα be the α−section of A, then µ− Penrose inverse exists for all
α−sections.

Therefore A+ T
α = Aα

Now, AT = ( αAα )T
L
α∈φ
/ A

αATα )
L
=(
α∈φ
/ A

αA+
L
= α
α∈φ
/ A

= A+ .

Thus AT is the µ− Penrose inverse of A.

Definition 5.2.11 An idempotent zκ matrix A is said to be range κ−symmetric


if, and only if R(A) = R(AT ).
 
1 1
Example 5.2.12 1. Consider the fuzzy matrix A =
1 1
Here KA2 K = A and R(A) = R(AT ).

Therefore, A is range κ−symmetric.


 
1 0
2. Now let us take another fuzzy matrix A = .
1 0
Here KA2 K = A but R(A) 6= R(AT ).

Hence A is not range κ−symmetric.

Theorem 5.2.13 If A is a range κ−symmetric and K the κ−permuted matrix,


then R(KA) = R(AK).

Proof Since A is range κ−symmetric, AK = KA

it follows that R(KA) = R(AK).

Theorem 5.2.14 Let A ∈ Fnk be a range κ−symmetric and ρ(A) = r, then


ρ(A) = ρ(AT ).

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 62


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

Proof Since A is range κ−symmetric, R(A) = R(AT ).

By taking ρ(A) = r, it is obvious that

ρ(A) = R(AT ) and ρ(AT ) = R(A).

Hence ρ(A) = ρ(AT ).

Theorem 5.2.15 Let E be symmetric idempotent zκ matrix and A ∈ Fnk such


that R(A) = R(E). Then the following are equivalent.

1. A is range κ−symmetric.

2. A+
k exists and range κ−symmetric.

3. AE = EA.

Proof (1) ⇒ (2) :

Since A is range κ− symmetric,

R(A) = R(AT ) = ρ(A).

Since both column space and row space are equal, A+


k exists such that

A+ T
k = A .

Since R(A) = R(AT ) ⇒ R[(A)]T = R(AT )T

⇒ R[A+ T T
k ] = R[(A ) ]

Thus A+
k is range κ−symmetric.

(2) ⇒ (3) :

Since A+ + T +
k exists, Ak = A and E = Ak A is symmetric idempotent zκ

fuzzy matrix.

AE = AAT A = A ⇒ R(E) ⊇ R(A) and

A+
k A = E ⇒ R(A) ⊇ R(E).

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 63


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

Hence R(A) = R(E).

Since A+ T
k is range κ−symmetric, R(A ) = R(A) = R(E)

Since E is symmetric κ−idempotent, AT = AT E

(AT )T = (AT E)T

A = ET A

= EA.

Thus E = A+
k and AE = EA with R(A) = R(E).

(3) ⇒ (1) :

Since AE = EA = A,

EAT = AT E = AT
AT E = AT ⇒ R(AT ) ⊆ R(E) = R(A) (5.3)

and AT E = EAT ⇒ R(E) ⊇ R(EAT ) = R(A)


⇒ R(A) ⊇ R(AT ). (5.4)

From 5.3 and 5.4, ⇒ R(A) = R(AT ).

Thus, A is range κ−symmetric.

5.3 Spectral inverses on κ−idempotent fuzzy


matrices

In this section, the existence of #− inverse and δ− inverse for idempotent zκ


matrix have been discussed. The relation between the δ− inverse and #− inverse
of a square fuzzy matrix are determined ultimately.

Definition 5.3.1 For a κ−idempotent fuzzy matrix A, the #− inverse of A,


denoted as A# #
k is a commuting semi γ−inverse of A, that is AAk A = A,

A# # # # #
k AAk = Ak and AAk = Ak A.

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 64


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

Theorem 5.3.2 If A#
k is a #− inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix A, then the

#− inverse of A2 is KA#
k K.

Proof A2 (KA# 2 2 #
k K)A = A KAk KA
2

= KAA#
k AK

= KAK

= A2 .

In the similar manner, we will prove

(KA# # #
k K)A(KAk K) = KAk K

Next, by the definition, A = A2 A# # 2


k = Ak A

Multiplying K 2 on both sides,

K 2 (A# 2 # 2
k A ) = (Ak A )K
2

that is, (KA# 2 2 #


k K)A = A (KAk K).

Hence KA# 2
k K is the group inverse of A .

Lemma 5.3.3 If A#
k is the #− inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix A, then

A2 = A#
k.

Proof By theorem 5.1.14, A2 ∈ A{1, 2} for the idempotent zκ matrix A,

we have AA# # # # # #
k A = A, Ak AAk = Ak and AAk = Ak A.

Now A = A3 = AA2 = A2 A.

Hence, A# 2
k = A .

 
0.1 0.1 0.1
Example 5.3.4 Let A = 0.2 0.4 0.2 .
0.7 0.6 0.8

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 65


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

    
0 0 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0 1
2
We have KA K = 0 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0 1 0
1 0 0 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 1 0 0
 
0.1 0.1 0.1
= 0.2 0.4 0.2
0.7 0.6 0.8
A is κ−idempotent.

Hence A# #
k exists and Ak = A.

Here AAT A 6= A ⇒ AT is not a γ−inverse of A.

Thus A+
k does not exists.

Hence for an idempotent fuzzy matrix A, if A# +


k exists then Ak need not

exists.

Theorem 5.3.5 If A# k #
k is the #− inverse of A ∈ Fn , then (KA)k = KA and

(AK)#
k = AK.

By Lemma 5.3.3, proof follows immediately.

Theorem 5.3.6 If A ∈ Fn and An ∈ Fnk , then (An )# n


k = A for all n > 1.

Proof By using AA# #


k = Ak A,

we easily verify that A(An )# n #


k = (A )k A.

Hence #− inverse of An is (An )#


k , n > 1.

Converse of the above theorem is not true, which is illustrated in the


following example.

 
0 1
Example 5.3.7 Consider A = and for any positive integer n > 1,
1 1
 
1 1
An = is an κ−idempotent matrix.
1 1

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 66


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

Here (An )# n
k = A for all n > 1.

However, A#
k does not exists.

Theorem 5.3.8 If A ∈ Fnk has a #− inverse A# n # # n


k , then (A )k = (Ak ) .

Proof By Theorem 5.3.2, (A2 )# #


k = KAk K

= (A# 2
k) .

By induction, we get (An )# # n


k = (Ak ) .

Definition 5.3.9 An idempotent zκ matrix A is said to be −matrix if, and


#
only if A+
k = Ak

Theorem 5.3.10 If A ∈ Fnk is −matrix, then KA and AK are also −matrix.

#
Proof If A is −matrix, then A+
k = Ak

A+
k = A
2

A+
k = KAK

A+
k K = KA

#
(KA)+
k = (KA)k .

#
In the similar way, we prove (AK)+
k = (AK)k .

Hence KA and AK are −matrix.

Definition 5.3.11 For an idempotent zκ matrix A, the δ− inverse of A denoted


as Adk is the solution of the following equations :

(i) For some positive integer m, Am = Am+1 .X

(ii) X = X 2A

(iii) AX = XA

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 67


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

The smallest positive integer m for which the above condition is satisfied is called
the κ−index of A.

Theorem 5.3.12 If Adk is the δ− inverse of idempotent zκ matrix A,


then Adk = A2 .

Proof We have A = A4 = A2 .A2 . Hence m = 1

A2 = A5 = (A2 )2 .A and

AA2 = A3 = A2 .A.

Hence Adk = A2 .

Theorem 5.3.13 If Adk is the κ−commuting δ− inverse of idempotent zκ


matrix A, then (i) (KA)dk = KA and (ii) (AK)dk = AK

Proof Since KA commutes with itself and it is a tripotent matrix, we have

KA = KA.KA.KA

= (KA)2 .KA with m = 1.

It follows that (KA)dk = KA.

The proof of (ii) is similar to (i).

Theorem 5.3.14 For an idempotent zκ matrix A, if G is the δ−inverse of A


with κ−index P, then for any s ≥ p, As has #− inverse and Gs is the #−inverse
of As .

Proof Suppose A ∈ Fnk has δ− inverse G of index p, then by definition,

Ap+1 G = Ap , G2 = G and AG = GA.

We claim that Gp is the #− inverse.

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 68


5 Some Inverses on k−Idempotent Fuzzy Matrices

Now, Ap Gp Ap = Ap Gp−2 (G2 A)Ap−1 = Ap Gp−1 Ap−1

= . . . = Ap GA = Ap+1 G = Ap

Also, (Gp )Ap (Gp ) = (Gp )2 Ap = (G2 )p = Gp .

Thus, Gp is the #− inverse of Ap .

Hence by using Theorem 5.3.6, we get for any s ≥ p, As has #− inverse


and Gs is the #− inverse of Ap .

A study on k−idempotent fuzzy matrices 69

You might also like