CH 5
CH 5
Fuzzy Matrices
However this fails for a fuzzy matrix, that is, for A ∈ Fmn under the max-
min fuzzy operations, the matrix equation AXA = A need not have a solution
X. If A has a generalized inverse (γ−inverse), then A is said to be regular.
for all A−
k ∈ A{1}.
1 0.5
Example 5.1.2 Let A = ∈ Fn2 and the γ−inverse is given by
0.5 1
− 0.5 1
Ak = such that
1 0
− 1 0.5 0.5 1 1 0.5
AAk A =
0.5 1 1 0 0.5 1
1 0.5
= = A.
0.5 1
Theorem 5.1.3 If A− k 2
k is a γ−inverse of A ∈ Fn , then γ−inverse of A is
KA−
k K.
Proof A2 (KA− 2 2 −
k K)A = A KAk KA
2
= KAA−
k AK
= KAK
= A2 .
Therefore, KA− 2
k K ∈ A {1}.
Proposition 5.1.4 If A− k −
k is a γ−inverse of A ∈ Fn , then Ak K = KA and
KA−
k = AK.
Proof KA[A− −
k K]KA = KAAk A
= KA
AK[KA− −
k ]AK = AAk AK
= AK.
Proposition 5.1.5 If A− k 3 − −
k is a γ−inverse of A ∈ Fn , then A = AAk = Ak A.
Proof A3 (AA− 3 3 −
k )A = A AAk AA
2
= A3 AA2
= (A3 )2
= A3 .
Proof AA2 A = A4
that is AA2 A = A.
Theorem 5.1.7 Let A ∈ Fnk and X ∈ A{1}, then AX and XA are idempotent
zκ matrices.
= K(AXA)XK
= KAKX
= A2 X
= AX.
= KX(AXA)K
= XKAK
= XA2
= XA.
1 0 1 1
Example 5.1.8 If A = then there exists a X = ∈ A{1} such
0 0 1 0
that AXA = A.
1 1 1 0
Here AX = and XA =
0 0 1 0
2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 1
Also K(AX) K =
1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0
1 1
= = AX
0 0
0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1
and K(XA)2 K =
1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0
1 0
= = XA
1 0
therefore, AX and XA are κ−idempotent.
Lemma 5.1.10 For A ∈ Fn , A is regular fuzzy matrix if, and only if there exists
an idempotent zκ matrix H such that R(H) = R(A).
We have X is κ− idempotent.
Now, A2 AA2 = A5
=A
In this section, with the existence of least square γ−inverse and minimum norm
γ−inverse, µ− penrose inverse for idempotent zκ matrix are found. A nec-
essary condition for the µ−Penrose inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix to be
k−idempotent is also derived.
(1,3)
Theorem 5.2.3 If Ak is a {1, 3}−inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix A,
(1,3) (1,3)
then [A2 ]k = KAk K.
(1,4)
Theorem 5.2.4 If Ak is a {1, 4}−inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix A,
(1,4) (1,4)
then [A2 ]k = KAk K.
By combining the Theorems 5.1.3, 5.2.3 and 5.2.4, we easily prove the
following theorem.
Theorem 5.2.6 If A+
k is a µ− Penrose inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix A,
K.
KA3 = A3 K
(KA3 )+ 3 +
k = (A K)k
Kk+ (A3 )+ 3 + +
k = (A )k Kk
K(A3 )+ 3 +
k = (A )k K .
Proof We have
A2 (A+ 2 2 + +
k ) A = (AA)(Ak Ak )(AA)
= (AAA+ +
k )(Ak AA)
= AA+ +
k A.AAk A
= AA
= A. (5.1)
and (A+ 2 2 + 2 + + + +
k ) A (Ak ) = (Ak Ak )(AA)(Ak Ak )
= (A+ + + +
k Ak A)(AAk Ak )
= (A+ + + +
k AAk )(Ak AAk )
= A+ +
k Ak
= (A+ 2
k) . (5.2)
(A2 )+ + 2
k = (Ak )
Now A+ 2 +
k = (KA K)k
= K(A2 )+
kK
= K(A+ 2
k ) K.
Hence A+
k is idempotent zκ matrix.
Proof Let Aα be the α−section of A, then µ− Penrose inverse exists for all
α−sections.
Therefore A+ T
α = Aα
Now, AT = ( αAα )T
L
α∈φ
/ A
αATα )
L
=(
α∈φ
/ A
αA+
L
= α
α∈φ
/ A
= A+ .
1. A is range κ−symmetric.
2. A+
k exists and range κ−symmetric.
3. AE = EA.
A+ T
k = A .
⇒ R[A+ T T
k ] = R[(A ) ]
Thus A+
k is range κ−symmetric.
(2) ⇒ (3) :
Since A+ + T +
k exists, Ak = A and E = Ak A is symmetric idempotent zκ
fuzzy matrix.
A+
k A = E ⇒ R(A) ⊇ R(E).
Since A+ T
k is range κ−symmetric, R(A ) = R(A) = R(E)
A = ET A
= EA.
Thus E = A+
k and AE = EA with R(A) = R(E).
(3) ⇒ (1) :
Since AE = EA = A,
EAT = AT E = AT
AT E = AT ⇒ R(AT ) ⊆ R(E) = R(A) (5.3)
A# # # # #
k AAk = Ak and AAk = Ak A.
Theorem 5.3.2 If A#
k is a #− inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix A, then the
#− inverse of A2 is KA#
k K.
Proof A2 (KA# 2 2 #
k K)A = A KAk KA
2
= KAA#
k AK
= KAK
= A2 .
(KA# # #
k K)A(KAk K) = KAk K
K 2 (A# 2 # 2
k A ) = (Ak A )K
2
Hence KA# 2
k K is the group inverse of A .
Lemma 5.3.3 If A#
k is the #− inverse of an idempotent zκ matrix A, then
A2 = A#
k.
we have AA# # # # # #
k A = A, Ak AAk = Ak and AAk = Ak A.
Now A = A3 = AA2 = A2 A.
Hence, A# 2
k = A .
0.1 0.1 0.1
Example 5.3.4 Let A = 0.2 0.4 0.2 .
0.7 0.6 0.8
0 0 1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0 1
2
We have KA K = 0 1 0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.2 0 1 0
1 0 0 0.7 0.6 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.8 1 0 0
0.1 0.1 0.1
= 0.2 0.4 0.2
0.7 0.6 0.8
A is κ−idempotent.
Hence A# #
k exists and Ak = A.
Thus A+
k does not exists.
exists.
Theorem 5.3.5 If A# k #
k is the #− inverse of A ∈ Fn , then (KA)k = KA and
(AK)#
k = AK.
0 1
Example 5.3.7 Consider A = and for any positive integer n > 1,
1 1
1 1
An = is an κ−idempotent matrix.
1 1
Here (An )# n
k = A for all n > 1.
However, A#
k does not exists.
= (A# 2
k) .
#
Proof If A is −matrix, then A+
k = Ak
A+
k = A
2
A+
k = KAK
A+
k K = KA
#
(KA)+
k = (KA)k .
#
In the similar way, we prove (AK)+
k = (AK)k .
(ii) X = X 2A
(iii) AX = XA
The smallest positive integer m for which the above condition is satisfied is called
the κ−index of A.
A2 = A5 = (A2 )2 .A and
AA2 = A3 = A2 .A.
Hence Adk = A2 .
KA = KA.KA.KA
= . . . = Ap GA = Ap+1 G = Ap