0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views10 pages

222 03 Basic Definitions Conventions

A group G with respect to a binary operation ∗ must satisfy four properties: closure, associativity, the existence of an identity element, and the existence of inverses for all elements. The document also discusses specific examples of groups, such as integers under addition and rational numbers excluding 1 under a specific operation, and defines finite and infinite groups. Additionally, it introduces the concept of commutative (abelian) groups and the Cayley table as a tool for analyzing group operations.

Uploaded by

kaan.eroglu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views10 pages

222 03 Basic Definitions Conventions

A group G with respect to a binary operation ∗ must satisfy four properties: closure, associativity, the existence of an identity element, and the existence of inverses for all elements. The document also discusses specific examples of groups, such as integers under addition and rational numbers excluding 1 under a specific operation, and defines finite and infinite groups. Additionally, it introduces the concept of commutative (abelian) groups and the Cayley table as a tool for analyzing group operations.

Uploaded by

kaan.eroglu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Definition. Let G be a nonempty set and let ∗ be a binary operation on G.

We
say that G is a group with respect to ∗ or that G is a group under ∗ or that (G, ∗)
is a group provided the following hold.

(i) For any pair a, b of elements in G, a ∗ b is a uniquely determined element of


G.

(ii) For all a, b, c ∈ G, we have

(a ∗ b) ∗ c = a ∗ (b ∗ c).

(iii) There is an element e in G such that, for all a ∈ G:

a ∗ e = a, e ∗ a = a.
(iv) For all a ∈ G, there is an x ∈ G such that

a ∗ x = e, x ∗ a = e.

(i) For any pair a, b of elements in G, a ∗ b is a uniquely determined element of


G.
This is called the closure axiom. We say that G is closed with respect to ∗
or G is closed under ∗.

(ii) For all a, b, c ∈ G, we have

(a ∗ b) ∗ c = a ∗ (b ∗ c).

∗ is said to be associative in case the above equation holds for all a, b, c ∈ G.

(iii) Notice the order of the quantifiers: ∃∀.

∃e∀a(a ∗ e = a ∧ e ∗ a = a).

Such an e is called an identity element of G.

(iv) Notice the order of the quantifiers: ∀∃.

∀a∃x(a ∗ x = e ∧ x ∗ a = e).

Such an x is called an inverse of a. Here x depends on a.

1 Lemma. Let G be a group with respect to ∗, let e be an identity element of G.


e is the unique identity element of G.
Every element has a unique inverse.

1
Proof: Suppose that e and f are identities of G. Then e ∗ f = e and e ∗ f = f ,
so e = e ∗ f = f .
Let a ∈ G. Suppose that x, y ∈ G are inverses of a. Then

(x ∗ a) ∗ y = x ∗ (a ∗ y)
e∗y =x∗e
y = x.

Definition. Let G be a group with respect to ∗.


The unique element e of G that satifies

for all a ∈ G: a∗e=a e∗a=a

is called the identity element of G.


Let a be an element of G; the unique element x of G that satifies

a ∗ x = e, x∗a=e

is called the inverse of a, denoted by a−1 .

Remember this page?


(i) For any bijections f : A −→ A and g : A −→ A, their composition g ◦ f is a
bijection from A to A.
(ii) For any bijections f : A −→ A and g : A −→ A and h : A −→ A, we have

(h ◦ g) ◦ f = h ◦ (g ◦ f ).

(iii) The identity function idA is a bijection from A to A and

f ◦ idA = f, idA ◦ f = f for all bijections f from A to A.

(iv) For every bijection f from A to A, there is a bijection f −1 : A −→ A such


that
f ◦ f −1 = idA , f −1 ◦ f = idA .

Let A be any nonempty set. Let SA denote the set of all bijections from A onto
A. Then SA is a group with respect to the composition ◦ of functions.
Do you remember this page?
Let n be a positive integer.
(i) For any a, b in Zn , their sum a + b is an element of Zn .
(ii) For all elements a, b, c in Zn , we have

(a + b) + c = a + (b + c).

2
(iii) There is an element 0̄ in Zn , and for every a in Zn , we have
a + 0̄ = a, 0̄ + a = a.

(iv) For every a in Zn , there is an element −a ∈ Zn such that


a + −a = 0̄, −a + a = 0̄.

Thus Zn is a group under addition.

(i) For any a, b in Z, their sum a + b is an element of Z.


(ii) For all elements a, b, c in Z, we have
(a + b) + c = a + (b + c).

(iii) There is an element 0 in Z, and for every a in Z, we have


a + 0 = a, 0 + a = a.

(iv) For every a in Z, there is an element −a ∈ Z such that


a + (−a) = 0, (−a) + a = 0.

Z is a group with respect to addition.


Q is a group with respect to addition.
R is a group with respect to addition.
C is a group with respect to addition.

C \ {0} is a group with respect to multiplication.


R \ {0} is a group with respect to multiplication.
Q \ {0} is a group with respect to multiplication.

Z \ {0} is not a group with respect to multiplication.


For elements a, b ∈ Z, we write a ∗ b = a + b + 2. Is Z a group with respect to
∗?
(i) For any integers a, b ∈ Z, the element a + b + 2 = a ∗ b is an integer, so Z is
closed with respect to ∗.

(ii) Let’s check associativity. For all a, b, c ∈ Z, we have


(a ∗ b) ∗ c = (a + b + 2) ∗ c
= (a + b + 2) + c + 2
= a + (b + 2 + c) + 2
= a + (b + c + 2) + 2
= a + (b ∗ c) + 2
= a ∗ (b ∗ c),
so ∗ is an associative operation on Z.

3
(iii) Is there an identity element? Is there an e ∈ Z such that a ∗ e = a and
e ∗ a = a for all a ∈ Z? If there exists such an integer e, then e must satisfy

a+e+2=a

and e must be equal to −2.

Let’s check whether −2 is an identity element. First we notice that −2 ∈ Z.


For all a ∈ Z, we have

a ∗ (−2) = a + (−2) + 2 = a;
(−2) ∗ a = (−2) + a + 2 = a

and therefore −2 is an identity element.

(iv) Does every integer a have an inverse in Z? Let a be an element of Z. If a


has an inverse x, then x must satisfy

a ∗ x = −2, a + x + 2 = −2, x = −4 − a.

Let’s check whether −4 − a is an inverse of a. We notice that −4 − a ∈ Z. Also

a ∗ (−4 − a) = a + (−4 − a) + 2 = −2,


(−4 − a) ∗ a = (−4 − a) + a + 2 = −2,

and −4 − a is indeed an inverse of a. Thus every element of Z has an inverse in


Z. Therefore Z is a group with respect to ∗.
For elements a, b ∈ Q \ {1}, we write a ◦ b = ab − a − b + 2. Is Q \ {1} a group
with respect to ◦?

(i) For any rational numbers a, b ∈ Q \ {1}, the element ab − a − b + 2 = a ◦ b


is a rational number. Does it belong to Q \ {1}? Is it different from 1? Can
it be equal to 1?

If a ◦ b = 1, then

ab − a − b + 2 = 1
ab − a − b + 1 = 0
(a − 1)(b − 1) = 0
a = 1 or b = 1,

contrary to a ∈ Q \ {1} and b ∈ Q \ {1}.


Thus for every a, b ∈ Q \ {1}, we have a ◦ b ∈ Q \ {1}.
In other words, Q \ {1} is closed with respect to ◦.

4
(ii) Is ◦ associative? For all a, b, c ∈ Q \ {1}, we have

(a ◦ b) ◦ c = (a ◦ b)c − (a ◦ b) − c + 2
= (ab − a − b + 2)c
− (ab − a − b + 2) − c + 2
= abc − ac − bc + 2c
− ab + a + b − 2 − c + 2
= abc − ab − ac − bc + a + b + c (1)

and

a◦(b ◦ c) = a(b ◦ c) − a − (b ◦ c) + 2
= a(bc − b − c + 2)
− a − (bc − b − c + 2) + 2
= abc − ab − ac + 2a
− a − bc + b + c − 2 + 2
= abc − ab − ac − bc + a + b + c. (2)

By the equality of (1) and (2), we conclude that ◦ is associative.

(iii) Is there an identity element in Q \ {1}? Is there an e ∈ Q \ {1} such that


a ◦ e = a and e ◦ a = a for all a ∈ Q \ {1}?

If such an e exists, then a ◦ e = a must hold, i.e.,

ae − a − e + 2 = a
ae − 2a − e + 2 = 0
a(e − 2) − (e − 2) = 0
(a − 1)(e − 2) = 0
e=2

must hold. Let’s check whether 2 is an identity in Q \ {1}.

First we note that 2 ∈ Q \ {1}.


Also for any a ∈ Q \ {1}, we have

a ◦ 2 = a2 − a − 2 + 2 = a,
2 ◦ a = 2a − 2 − a + 2 = a.

Thus 2 is indeed an identity element.

(iv) Does every element a ∈ Q \ {1} have an inverse?

5
If there exists an inverse of a ∈ Q \ {1} and if we call it x, then x must satisfy
a ◦ x = 2, so

ax − a − x + 2 = 2
ax − a − x = 0
ax − a − x + 1 = 1
(a − 1)(x − 1) = 1
1
x−1=
a−1
1 a
x=1+ =
a−1 a−1
must hold.
a a
Let’s see whether a−1 is an inverse of a. We observe that a−1 is a rational
number and that a−1 6= 1, so a−1
a a
∈ Q \ {1}.
For all a ∈ Q \ {1}, we have
a a a
a◦ =a −a− +2
a−1 a−1 a−1
a2 a2 − a a
= − − +2
a−1 a−1 a−1
a2 − a2 + a − a
= +2
a−1
= 2,

a a a
◦a= a− −a+2
a−1 a−1 a−1
a2 a a2 − a
= − − +2
a−1 a−1 a−1
a2 − a − a2 + a
= +2
a−1
= 2,
a
so a−1is an inverse of a.
Hence Q \ {1} is a group with respect to ◦.

Definition. Let G be a group with respect to ◦.

If the number of elements of G is finite and equal to n ∈ N, then (G, ◦) is said


to be a group of finite order or a finite group and n is called the order of (G, ◦).
The order of (G, ◦) is denoted by |G|.

If the number of elements of G is not finite, then (G, ◦) is said to be a group


of infinite order or an infinite group. In this case we write |G| = ∞.

6
We will not distinguish between countably infinite sets and uncountable sets.

Definition. A group (G, ∗) is called a commutative group or an abelian group, if,


in addition to the group axioms (i)-(iv), a fifth axiom

(v) a ∗ b = b ∗ a for all a, b ∈ G.

holds.

An operation ∗ which satisfies (v) is called a commutative operation.

Cayley table
A convenient device for investigating groups.
Let G be a group with respect to ◦, of small order n.
Make a table of n rows and n columns, label the rows and columns by the
elements of G.
In the cell where the row of a ∈ G and the column of b ∈ G meet, we write
a ◦ b.
This square is known as the Cayley table or the operation table (multiplication
or addition table) of the group (G, ◦).

◦ b

a a◦b

Addition table of the group (Z4 , +)

+ 0̄ 1̄ 2̄ 3̄
0̄ 0̄ 1̄ 2̄ 3̄
1̄ 1̄ 2̄ 3̄ 0̄
2̄ 2̄ 3̄ 0̄ 1̄
3̄ 3̄ 0̄ 1̄ 2̄

2 Lemma. Let G be a group with respect to ◦ and let a, b ∈ G.


(1) There is one and only one x ∈ G such that a ◦ x = b.
(2) There is one and only one y ∈ G such that y ◦ a = b.

Proof: (1) Existence of x. Put x = a−1 ◦b. Then x ∈ G and a◦x = a◦(a−1 ◦b) =
(a ◦ a−1 ) ◦ b = e ◦ b = b.

7
Uniqueness of x. Suppose that x1 and x2 are elements of G with a ◦ x1 = b
and a ◦ x2 = b. Then

a ◦ x1 = b = a ◦ x2
a−1 ◦ (a ◦ x1 ) = a−1 ◦ (a ◦ x2 )
(a−1 ◦ a) ◦ x1 = (a−1 ◦ a) ◦ x2
e ◦ x1 = e ◦ x2
x1 = x2 .

Thus x is unique.
This completes the proof of (1). □

3 Lemma. Let G be a group with respect to ◦ and let a, b ∈ G.


(1) There is one and only one x ∈ G such that a ◦ x = b.
(2) There is one and only one y ∈ G such that y ◦ a = b.
For every a ∈ G, the functions
G −→ G x 7−→ a ◦ x,
G −→ G y 7−→ y ◦ a

are bijections from G to G.

The previous lemma has a simple interpretation with Cayley tables.

Part (1) states: in the row labelled by a, every element b of the group does
appear, and appears exactly once.

◦ x ◦ a

a b y b

Part (2) states: in the column labelled by a, every element b of the group does
appear, and appears exactly once.

Each row and each column is a complete list of the elements of the group,
without repetitions.

A group of order 3.
G = {e, a, b}, ◦.

◦ e a b
e e a b
a a b e
b b e a

8
(a ◦ a) ◦ a = a ◦ (a ◦ a)
(a ◦ a) ◦ b = a ◦ (a ◦ b)
(a ◦ b) ◦ a = a ◦ (b ◦ a)
(a ◦ b) ◦ b = a ◦ (b ◦ b)

(b ◦ a) ◦ a = b ◦ (a ◦ a)
(b ◦ a) ◦ b = b ◦ (a ◦ b)
(b ◦ b) ◦ a = b ◦ (b ◦ a)
(b ◦ b) ◦ b = b ◦ (b ◦ b)

4 Lemma. Let G be a group and let a1 , a2 , . . . , am , b be elements of G. If


ai b = bai for all i ∈ {1, 2, . . . , m}, then

(a1 a2 . . . am )b = b(a1 a2 . . . am ).

Proof: We make induction on m. The case m = 1 is included in the hypothesis.


Suppose now m ⩾ 1. Inductively suppose that the claim is true for m − 1.
We have

(a1 . . . am−1 am )b = (a1 . . . am−1 )(am b)


= (a1 . . . am−1 )(bam )
= ((a1 . . . am−1 )b)am
= (b(a1 . . . am−1 ))am
= b((a1 . . . am−1 )am )
= b(a1 . . . am−1 am ).


Let G be a group and let a, b, c be elements of G. Suppose that ab = ba,
ac = ca, bc = cb.

a(cb) = a(bc) = (bc)a = b(ca) = b(ac)


= (ba)c = c(ba) = c(ab) (1)

Therefore:

(ab)c = a(bc)
b(ac) = b(ca)
c(ab) = c(ba)

and abc = acb = bac = bca = cab = cba.

9
5 Lemma. Let G be a group.
For all n ∈ N, n ⩾ 2,
for all a1 , a2 , . . . , an ∈ G such that ai aj = aj ai whenever i, j ∈ {1, 2, . . . , n},
for all arrangements k1 , k2 , . . . , kn of 1, 2, . . . , n,
we have
ak1 ak2 . . . akn = a1 a2 . . . an .

Proof: We will make induction on the number of factors.


Case n = 2. We have a1 a2 = a2 a1 by hypothesis.
The assertion has been verified in the case n = 3.
Suppose that n ⩾ 4 and that the the claim is true for n − 1 or less number of
factors of pairwise commuting elements and for all arrangements of them.
Let a1 , a2 , . . . , an be pairwise commuting elements of G and let k1 , k2 , . . . ,
kn be an arrangement of 1, 2, . . . , n.
Then n is equal to one of the numbers k1 , k2 , . . . , kn , say n = kj .
Then k1 , . . . , kj−1 , kj+1 , . . . , kn is an arrangement of 1, 2, . . . , n − 1. We
have

ak1 ak2 . . . akn = (ak1 ak2 . . . akj−1 )(akj (akj+1 . . . akn ))


= (ak1 ak2 . . . akj−1 )((akj+1 . . . akn )akj )
= (ak1 ak2 . . . akj−1 akj+1 . . . akn )akj
= (a1 a2 . . . an−1 )akj
= (a1 a2 . . . an−1 )an
= a1 a2 . . . an−1 an .

multiplicative notation additive notation


a · b, ab a+b
am ma
(a−1 )n = (an )−1 n(−a) = −(na)
a−n = (a−1 )n (−n)a = n(−a)
am an = am+n ma + na = (m + n)a
(am )n = amn n(ma) = (mn)a
(ab)n = an bn (if ab = ba) n(a + b) = na + nb
(if a + b = b + a).

10

You might also like