TTC Trails of Evidence How Forensic Science Works
TTC Trails of Evidence How Forensic Science Works
Crime is as old as human society. So is the use of evidence, witnesses, and reason to solve
crimes. The desire to identify lawbreakers and bring them to justice is so great that it has
inspired countless stories, novels, plays, movies, and television series. But how accurate are the
fictional portrayals of crime investigations? What happens behind the scenes when forensic
scientists crack a case? The actual details are far more than a lesson in how detective dramas
often get it wrong. Knowing how real forensic investigators approach real cases will help you
• serve as a better juror in a criminal trial or civil lawsuit;
• be a more effective witness if you ever see a crime take place or are a victim of one;
• sharpen your analysis of the endless array of crime reports that fill the news;
• think more critically in assessing the value of different types of evidence;
• learn about a wide range of technical fields that all come to bear in the investigation of
crime.
What's more, an introduction to the principles of forensic science and a look at some case
studies will give you a new appreciation for law enforcement, which in recent decades has seen
a revolution in its ability to determine who committed a crime, how it was done, and often, why.
Taught by veteran forensic scientist and Professor Elizabeth A. Murray of the College of Mount
St. Joseph, Trails of Evidence: How Forensic Science Works takes you from the crime scene
to the lab to the courtroom in 36 riveting half-hour lectures that reveal the personality and
passions of an investigative mind.
Forensic Science from the Inside
One of the nation's foremost experts in forensic anthropology, Professor Murray has
participated in hundreds of investigations, involving homicides, missing persons, and mass
disasters. In Trails of Evidence, she draws on this extensive experience to show how forensic
science works from the inside with discussions of cases such as these:
• American Eagle Flight 4184: After a commuter plane went down in rural Indiana in
1994, Professor Murray was called to assist with identification of the victims, a daunting
task that sheds light on how authorities mobilize to deal with the catastrophic loss of life.
• The cold case of a missing teen: Four decades after police gave up trying to identify a
young woman found dead in a cornfield, Professor Murray examined the evidence and
reached new conclusions that helped give a name to a teenager who met a tragic fate.
• The forgetful killer: A murder suspect agreed to take police to the spot where he
buried one of his victims nearly two years earlier—except he couldn't find it. Given only a
rough idea of where to search, Professor Murray used a few simple principles to locate
the grave.
You also learn about landmark forensic cases that are classics in the history of crime solving,
including these:
• Lindbergh kidnapping: The abduction and killing of Charles Lindbergh's infant son left
a host of puzzling clues, including a homemade ladder. When a suspect was arrested, tool
marks and other distinguishing features on the ladder were crucial in establishing his
guilt.
• First use of DNA fingerprinting:The death of two teenage girls in central England in
the 1980s led investigators to a strong suspect. However, a newly developed DNA
technology developed at a local university exonerated an innocent man and led to the
real killer.
• Ted Bundy: This notorious serial killer perfected a modus operandi that allowed him to
escape police for years. A master at hiding his tracks, he was finally convicted based
largely on testimony by a forensic odontologist, who matched bite marks on a victim to
Bundy's teeth.
Learn to Read the Evidence
Unlike what's shown on TV, forensic scientists do not chase down leads and question suspects.
Instead, they leave the legwork to the police and use the tools of science—chemistry, biology,
physics, and psychology—to uncover the story that carefully collected and analyzed evidence
has to tell.
But first they have to know what to look for at a crime scene. Professor Murray begins the
course by introducing Locard's exchange principle. Proposed a century ago by the French
forensic scientist Edmond Locard, this important idea holds that no one can commit a crime
without leaving something behind or altering the surroundings, however imperceptibly.
Armed with the assumption that clues are scattered everywhere, forensic investigators learn
how to approach and evaluate an unfamiliar setting. For example, Professor Murray recounts
how a police officer told her how to tell the difference between a ransacked house and a messy
housekeeper just by looking in the kitchen sink.
In the first section of the course, you explore protocols for investigating a scene, and you probe
some classic types of evidence:
• Fingerprints: Learn the finer points of this venerable tool of identification, including
how a common household product, Super Glue, is used to uncover latent prints.
• Shoeprints:Footprints are more commonly left behind at crime scenes than fingerprints.
Criminals can't avoid walking on a surface, even when they're careful not to touch
anything with their hands.
• Fibers:Microscopic fibers transferred to or from a crime scene have incriminated many
criminals, including Wayne Williams, convicted of the Atlanta child murders in 1982.
• Blood: TV dramas get it wrong when they show dramatic blood spatters revealed by
high-tech chemistry or lighting. What real forensic scientists see is a smear, made by a
perpetrator's attempt to clean up evidence.
• Handwriting:Signs of hesitation, such as jerky starts and stops, can indicate that
someone was trying to duplicate another person's handwriting by looking at a copy of it.
You also hear what goes into investigating a scene that has been nearly obliterated, whether by
arson, bombing, or structural collapse. And you learn how the aftermath of an auto accident
may hold all the clues needed to determine the sequence of events and who was probably at
fault.
In the second part of Trails of Evidence, you focus on Professor Murray's specialty—analysis
of human remains—discovering how the time of death is estimated, whether the body is
discovered hours or years after the fatal event. She explains the difference between a coroner
and a medical examiner. And using some powerful case histories, she describes the roles of
various forensic scientists in establishing the cause and manner of death and how unknown
persons are identified.
Professor Murray also delves into the psychology behind law enforcement, explaining that
effective interrogation strategies are seldom as confrontational as depicted on TV. You will also
hear about forensic profiling, the unreliability of eyewitness testimony, and the criminal mind.
Then she takes you into the courtroom to see how evidence is presented to the final arbiters of
its value: the judge and jury.