Module2 Reading
Module2 Reading
The
purpose
of
this
module
is
to
educate
the
participant
about
ethics
in
relation
to
the
nursing
profession
and
to
teach
important
aspects
of
ethical
decision
making
involving
patient
care.
This
module
also
provides
examination
and
discussion
of
concepts
related
to
ethical
theories
and
guidelines
for
the
practicing
nurse
in
today’s
healthcare
environment.
Ethics
and
Ethical
Dilemmas
Ethics
is
a
generic
term
that
covers
several
different
ways
of
understanding
and
examining
the
moral
life
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Bioethics
is
the
study
of
moral
and
social
implications
of
developments
in
the
biological
sciences
and
related
technology
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Bioethics
first
emerged
as
an
academic
interdisciplinary
field
in
the
1960’s
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Beauchamp
and
Childress
published
the
first
American
textbook
of
bioethics
titled
Principles
of
Biomedical
Ethics
in
1977.
Bioethics
addresses
a
broad
range
of
human
inquiry,
ranging
from
debates
over
the
boundaries
of
life,
surrogacy,
to
the
allocation
of
limited
healthcare
resources
(e.g.,
healthcare
rationing,
organ
donations)
to
the
right
to
refuse
medical
care
for
religious
or
cultural
reasons
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Morality
describes
the
norms
of
right
and
wrong
human
conduct
that
are
so
widely
shared
they
form
a
stable
social
agreement
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Morality
encompasses
many
standards
of
conduct,
moral
principles,
rules,
ideals,
rights,
and
virtues
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
One
learns
about
morality
while
growing
up,
and
the
universal
norms
may
differ
for
different
groups
such
as
physicians,
nurses,
lawyers,
teachers,
or
public
health
officials
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Common
morality
refers
to
the
set
of
norms
shared
by
all
persons
committed
to
morality
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Examples
of
the
norms
include
to
tell
the
truth,
prevent
evil
or
harm
from
occurring,
do
not
cause
pain
or
suffering,
keep
your
promises,
and
many
more
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Common
morality
also
includes
traits
such
as
integrity,
nonmalevolence,
kindness,
and
fidelity,
to
name
a
few
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
If
a
person
lacks
these
personality
traits,
it
is
believed
that
he
or
she
lacks
moral
character
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Approaches
to
ethics
are
classified
as
either
normative
or
non-‐normative
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
• Normative
ethics
describes
values,
behaviors,
and
ways
of
being
that
are
considered
right
or
wrong
when
deciding
what
to
do
in
a
specific
situation
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
Examples
include
the
actions
of
being
honest,
lying,
or
stealing.
Ethical
principles
are
theories
that
are
commonly
used
in
an
attempt
to
identify
and
justify
these
norms
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
• Practical
(Applied)
ethics
falls
under
the
normative
category.
It
applies
general
concepts
to
address
particular
problems
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
It
is
the
use
of
norms
and
other
moral
resources
in
deliberating
about
problems,
practices,
and
policies
in
professions,
institutions,
and
public
policy
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Although
there
is
no
straightforward
movement
from
general
norms
and
principles
to
particular
judgments,
they
1
Module
2.
Ethics
and
the
Role
of
Nurse
as
Advocate
serve
as
a
starting
point
for
the
development
of
norms
of
conduct
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Descriptive
ethics
and
meta-‐ethics
are
two
types
of
non-‐normative
ethics
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
• Descriptive
ethics
is
the
factual
investigation
of
moral
beliefs
and
conduct
that
uses
scientific
techniques
(anthropology,
sociology,
psychology
e.g.)
to
study
how
people
reason
and
act
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Descriptive
ethics
studies
the
phenomena
of
surrogate
decision-‐making
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
• Meta-‐ethics
involves
an
analysis
of
the
language,
concepts,
and
methods
of
reasoning
in
normative
ethics
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
This
includes
addressing
the
meaning
of
terms
such
as
right,
virtue,
obligation,
morality,
justification,
and
responsibility
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Meta-‐ethics
is
also
concerned
with
moral
epistemology
(the
theory
of
moral
knowledge),
the
logic
and
patterns
of
moral
reasoning
and
justification,
and
the
possibility
and
nature
of
moral
truth
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Important
questions
in
meta-‐ethics
are
whether
morality
is
objective
or
subjective,
relative
or
nonrelative,
and
rational
or
non-‐rational
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
An
ethical
dilemma
is
a
situation
in
which
an
individual
feels
compelled
to
choose
between
two
actions
that
will
affect
the
welfare
of
a
sentient
being,
and
both
actions
are
reasonably
justified
as
being
good,
neither
action
is
readily
justified
as
being
good,
or
the
goodness
of
the
actions
is
uncertain
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
Since
one
action
must
be
chosen,
the
decision
making
process
often
burdens
the
person
or
group
who
must
decide
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
Quite
often
when
a
person
is
facing
an
ethical
dilemma,
both
choices
may
feel
wrong
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
Leadership
Roles
In
the
past,
the
nursing
profession
focused
on
female
traits
(Garesche,
1944;
Denesford,
1946;
&
Way,
1962)
that
included
respect
for
authority
figures,
being
faithful
to
duty,
being
tactful,
cultivating
a
meek
and
mild
disposition,
loyalty,
and
cleanliness
(as
cited
in
Begley,
2010).
Begley
(2010)
now
credits
modern
day
codes
of
ethics
and
standards
of
conduct
for
creating
a
shift
in
the
traditional
understanding
and
characteristics
expected
of
a
nurse.
Modern
codes
rely
on
the
expectation
that
nurses
will
possess
the
intellectual
capacity
to
practice
effectively
and
to
advance
the
knowledge
base
of
the
discipline
(Begley,
2010).
Baley
(1986)
states
that
Florence
Nightingale,
English
nursing
pioneer
and
reformer,
believed
that
to
be
a
good
nurse,
one
must
first
be
a
good
person
(as
cited
in
Begley,
2010).
According
to
Beauchamp
(1995),
being
a
good
person
does
not
mean
simply
following
the
rules
but
instead
considering
what
sort
of
person
one
ought
to
be
rather
than
what
one
ought
to
do
(as
cited
in
Begley,
2010).
Codes
of
ethics
are
more
virtue-‐based
and
focus
more
on
the
characteristics
of
a
good
practice
and
the
character
of
the
agents
than
on
simple
rules
and
statements
(Begley,
2010).
2
Module
2.
Ethics
and
the
Role
of
Nurse
as
Advocate
The
International
Council
of
Nurses
(ICN)
Code
of
Ethics
(2013)
for
nurses
was
first
adopted
in
1953
and
revised
in
2012.
Its
purpose
is
to
serve
as
a
standard
for
nurses
worldwide
by
making
clear
that
inherent
in
nursing
is
respect
for
human
rights,
including
the
rights
to
life,
to
dignity,
and
to
be
treated
with
respect
(ICN,
2013).
The
Code
of
Ethics
is
reviewed
regularly
and
revised
in
response
to
the
realities
of
nursing
and
health
care
in
a
changing
society
(ICN,
2013).
The
ICN
Code
of
Ethics
reflects
a
shift
in
nursing
responsibility
from
a
focus
on
obedience
to
physicians
to
a
focus
on
patient
needs
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
It
is
used
to
guide
nurses
every
day
in
their
choices,
and
it
supports
their
refusal
to
participate
in
activities
that
conflict
with
caring
and
healing
(ICN,
2013).
The
International
Council
of
Nurses
Code
of
Ethics
is
based
on
four
responsibilities
of
the
nurse:
to
promote
health,
prevent
illness,
restore
health,
and
alleviate
(Chism,
2013).
The
International
Council
of
Nurses
(ICN)
Code
of
Ethics
is
composed
of
four
principle
elements
that
outline
the
standards
of
ethical
conduct.
These
elements
are
1)
Nurses
and
people,
2)
Nurses
and
practice,
3)
Nurse
and
the
profession,
and
4)
Nurses
and
co-‐workers
(ICN,
2013).
• Element
1-‐
Nurses
and
People:
The
nurse’s
primary
professional
responsibility
is
to
the
people
requiring
nursing
care
(ICN,
2013).
When
providing
care,
the
nurse
should
promote
an
environment
in
which
human
rights,
values,
customs,
and
spiritual
beliefs
of
the
individual,
family,
and
community
are
respected
(ICN,
2013).
The
nurse
ensures
that
individuals
receive
accurate,
sufficient,
and
timely
information
in
a
culturally
appropriate
manner
on
which
to
base
their
consent
for
care
and
related
treatment
(ICN,
2013).
The
nurse
should
hold
in
confidence
personal
information
and
use
judgment
in
sharing
this
information
(ICN,
2013).
Nurses
share
with
society
the
responsibility
for
initiating
and
supporting
action
to
meet
the
social
and
health
needs
of
the
public,
especially
those
of
vulnerable
populations
(ICN,
2013).
Nurses
should
serve
as
advocates
for
equity
and
social
justice
in
resource
allocation,
access
to
health
care,
and
other
social
and
economic
services
(ICN,
2013).
Lastly,
the
nurse
demonstrates
professional
values
such
as
respectfulness,
responsiveness,
compassion,
trustworthiness,
and
integrity
(ICN,
2013).
• Element
2-‐
Nurses
and
Practice:
The
nurse
carries
personal
responsibility
and
accountability
for
nursing
practice,
and
for
maintaining
competence
by
continual
learning
(ICN,
2013).
The
nurse
should
also
maintain
a
standard
of
personal
health
so
that
the
ability
to
provide
care
is
not
compromised
(ICN,
2013).
Judgment
should
always
be
used
by
the
nurse
regarding
individual
competence
when
accepting
and
delegating
responsibilities
(ICN,
2013).
At
all
times,
the
nurse
is
to
maintain
a
standard
of
personal
conduct
that
reflects
well
on
the
profession
and
enhances
its
image
and
public
confidence
(ICN,
2013).
The
nurse,
in
providing
care,
ensures
that
the
use
of
scientific
advances
and
technology
are
compatible
with
the
safety,
dignity,
and
rights
of
the
people
(ICN,
2013).
Nurses
should
strive
to
foster
and
maintain
a
practice
culture
promoting
ethical
behavior
and
open
dialogue
(ICN,
2013).
• Element
3-‐
Nurses
and
the
Profession:
Nurses
assume
the
major
role
in
determining
and
3
Module
2.
Ethics
and
the
Role
of
Nurse
as
Advocate
implementing
acceptable
standards
of
clinical
nursing
practice,
management,
research,
and
education
(ICN,
2013).
The
nurse
should
be
active
in
developing
a
core
of
research-‐based
professional
knowledge
that
supports
evidence-‐based
practice.
Nurses
should
similarly
be
active
in
developing
and
sustaining
a
core
of
professional
values
(ICN,
203).
Also,
the
nurse,
acting
through
the
professional
organization,
participates
in
creating
positive
practice
environments
and
maintains
safe,
equitable
social
and
economic
working
conditions
in
nursing
(ICN,
2013).
Nurses
practice
to
sustain
and
protect
the
natural
environment
and
are
aware
of
its
consequences
on
health
(ICN,
2013).
The
nurse
is
to
contribute
to
an
ethical
organizational
environment
and
be
willing
to
challenge
unethical
practices
and
settings
(ICN,
2013).
• Element
4-‐
Nurses
and
Coworkers:
The
nurse
should
sustain
a
collaborative
and
respectful
relationship
with
co-‐workers
in
nursing
and
other
fields
(ICN,
2013).
The
nurse
should
take
appropriate
action
to
safeguard
individuals,
families,
and
communities
when
their
health
is
endangered
by
a
co-‐worker
or
any
other
person
(ICN,
2013).
Appropriate
action
should
be
taken
by
the
nurse
to
support
and
guide
co-‐workers
to
advance
ethical
conduct
(ICN,
2013).
The
International
Council
of
Nurses
Code
of
Ethics
for
Nurses
(2006)
as
well
as
the
American
Nurses
Association
(ANA,
2001)
focus
on
the
importance
of
compassionate
patient
care
aimed
at
alleviating
suffering
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
Nurses
should
support
patients’
self-‐determination
and
protect
the
moral
space
where
patients
receive
care
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
Principles
of
Ethical
Reasoning
Ethical
principles
are
based
on
the
concepts,
theories,
literature,
and
techniques
of
moral
philosophy
and
are
central
to
bioethics
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
The
four
categories
of
ethical
principles
are
respect
for:
1.
Autonomy,
2.
Nonmaleficence,
3.
Beneficience,
4.
Justice
• Autonomy
is
the
respect
for
individuals
to
make
their
own
decisions
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Respecting
one’s
autonomy
includes
obtained
informed
consent
for
treatment;
facilitating
and
supporting
patients’
choices
regarding
treatment
options;
allowing
patients
to
refuse
treatments;
disclosing
comprehensive
and
truthful
information,
diagnoses,
and
treatment
options
to
patients;
and
maintaining
privacy
and
confidentiality
(Butt
&
Rich,
2013).
A
surrogate
decision
maker
must
determine
the
highest
net
benefit
among
the
available
options,
assigning
different
weights
to
interests
the
patient
has
in
each
option
and
discounting
or
subtracting
inherent
risks
of
costs
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
• Nonmaleficence
imposes
the
obligation
not
to
inflict
evil
or
harm
on
others
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
In
medical
ethics,
this
concept
is
phrased
as
“first,
do
no
harm”
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Issues
that
may
arise
when
studying
nonmaleficence
Nonmaleficence
include
negligence
and
standards
of
care,
withholding
and
withdrawing
treatment,
ordinary
and
extraordinary
treatment,
killing
and
allowing
to
die,
and
quality
of
life
considerations
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Nonmaleficence
supports
moral
rules
such
as
do
not
kill,
do
not
cause
pain
or
suffering,
do
not
incapacitate,
do
not
cause
offense,
4
Module
2.
Ethics
and
the
Role
of
Nurse
as
Advocate
and
do
not
deprive
others
of
the
goods
of
life
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
The
goal
of
the
ethical
principle
of
nonmaleficence
is
that
we
should
avoid
causing
harm
to
people
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
The
Rule
of
Double
Effect
distinguishes
between
intended
effects
and
merely
foreseen
effects
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Four
conditions
must
be
met
for
an
act
with
a
double
effect
to
be
justified:
1.
The
nature
of
the
act
must
be
good.
1. The
agent’s
intent
must
be
good,
the
bad
effect
can
be
foreseen
but
not
intended.
2. The
distinction
between
means
and
effects,
meaning
the
bad
effect
must
not
be
a
means
to
the
good
effect.
3. The
proportionality
between
the
good
effect
and
the
bad
effect,
meaning
the
good
effect
must
outweigh
the
bad
effect
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Looks
at
the
relationship
between
optional
treatments
and
obligatory
treatments.
There
are
several
conditions
for
overriding
the
obligation
to
treat,
such
as
whatever
1. Physicians
or
providers
cannot
perform;
2. Will
not
produce
physiological
effect;
3. Is
highly
unlikely
to
be
efficacious;
4. Probably
will
produce
only
low
grade,
insignificant
outcomes;
5. Is
highly
likely
to
be
more
burdensome
than
beneficial;
6. Is
completely
speculative
because
it
is
untried;
7. In
balancing
the
effectiveness,
potential
benefit,
and
potential
burden,
warrants
withdrawing
or
withholding
treatment
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Justification
for
overriding
treatment
is
usually
granted
when
the
burden
of
treatment
outweighs
the
benefits
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
• Beneficence,
in
terms
of
bioethics,
refers
to
the
moral
obligation
to
act
for
the
benefit
of
others
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
The
rules
of
obligation
for
the
ethical
principles
of
beneficence
are
to:
1. Protect
and
defend
the
rights
of
others
2. Prevent
harm
from
occurring
to
others
3. Remove
conditions
that
will
cause
harm
to
others
4. Help
persons
with
disabilities
5. Rescue
persons
in
danger
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Beneficence
demands
more
than
maleficence
because
it
requires
that
we
take
positive
steps
to
help
others,
provide
benefits
to
others,
and
rescue
others
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Benefits
are
measured
by
cost
effectiveness
analysis
(CEA),
cost
benefit
analysis
(CBA),
and
the
value
of
the
quality-‐adjusted
life
years
(QALY)
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
5
Module
2.
Ethics
and
the
Role
of
Nurse
as
Advocate
• Justice
describes
fairness,
what
is
deserved
and
entitled
(Beauchamp,
2009).
Distributive
justice
refers
to
fair,
equitable,
and
appropriate
distribution
of
benefits
or
burdens
justified
by
norms
that
structure
the
terms
of
social
cooperation
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Justices
states
people
are
entitled
to
an
equal
share
according
to:
1. Their
need
2. Their
effort
3. Their
contribution
4. Their
merit
5. Free
market
exchanges
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Fair
opportunity
rule
states
that
individuals
should
not
receive
social
benefits
on
the
basis
of
undeserved
advantageous
properties
and
should
not
be
denied
social
benefits
on
the
basis
of
undeserved
disadvantageous
properties,
because
they
are
not
responsible
for
the
properties
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
These
properties
include:
racial,
ethnic
and
gender
disparities,
and
vulnerable
and
exploited
populations
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
One
must
also
consider
issues
of
justice,
such
as
looking
at
peoples’
access
to
care,
enrolling
economically
disadvantaged
individuals
in
research,
the
moral
right
to
government–funded
healthcare,
the
right
to
a
decent
minimum
of
healthcare,
the
right
to
forfeit
their
right
to
healthcare,
the
right
to
health,
and
the
issue
of
rationing
and
setting
priorities
when
it
comes
to
resources
(Beauchamp
&
Childress,
2009).
Ethics
and
the
Nursing
Process
An
important
part
of
clinical
reasoning
is
the
ability
to
work
up
the
ethical
aspects
of
a
case
(Georgetown
University
Center
for
Child
and
Human
Development,
n.d.).
The
ethics
workup
emphasizes
a
sensible
progression
from
the
facts
of
the
case
to
a
morally
sound
decision,
using
a
five-‐step
process
to
guide
the
thought
process
behind
morally
troubling
cases
as
follows
(Georgetown
University
Center
for
Clinical
Bioethics).
• Step
1:
What
are
the
facts?
This
stage
stresses
the
need
to
clarify
the
facts
of
the
case
in
order
to
make
a
decision.
It
asks
questions
of
the
‘who’
(persons
involved),
‘what’
(prognosis,
preferences,
therapeutic
options),
‘when’
(time
constraints
or
chronology
of
events),
‘where’
(medical
setting),
and
‘why’
(reasons
supporting
the
claims,
goals
of
current
care.
• Step
2:
What
is
the
issue?
Evaluates
whether
the
conflict
is
personal,
interpersonal,
institutional,
or
at
a
societal
level.
Asks
if
there
is
a
question
at
the
level
of
thought
or
feeling
(Georgetown
University
Center
for
Clinical
Bioethics).
Interprets
whether
the
question
has
a
moral
or
ethical
component.
• Step
3:
Frame
the
Issue?
Frames
the
ethical
issue
at
stake
in
terms
of
areas
of
concern:
6
Module
2.
Ethics
and
the
Role
of
Nurse
as
Advocate
1. Identify
appropriate
decision
makers
(which
option
is
most
likely
to
benefit
and
not
harm
the
patient?),
2. Apply
criteria
to
be
used
in
reaching
clinical
decisions
(biomedical
good
of
the
patient
and
goods
and
interests
of
other
parties),
and
3. Establish
healthcare
professional’s
moral
and
professional
obligations.
• Step
4:
Identify
and
weigh
alternative
courses
of
action
and
then
decide.
Realize
that
a
decision
must
be
made
and
that
there
is
no
simple
formula.
This
step
requires
clinical
judgment
for
doing
so,
practical
wisdom,
and
moral
argument.
Sources
of
justification
include:
1. Internal
morality
of
the
profession:
the
nature
of
healthcare
professional-‐
patient
relationship;
compatibility
of
recommended
course
of
actions
with
aims
of
profession
2. Approaches
to
ethical
inquiry
3. Grounding
and
source
of
ethics
4. Ethically
relevant
considerations
The
ethically
relevant
considerations
include
balancing
benefits
and
harms,
disclosure,
informed
consent
and
shared
decision
making,
norms
of
family
life,
relationship
between
clinicians
and
patients,
professional
integrity
of
clinicians,
cost
effectiveness
of
allocations,
issues
of
cultural
and
religious
variations,
and
considerations
of
power.
• Step
5:
The
critique.
The
fifth
step
of
the
Ethics
Workup
considers
the
major
objections
and
the
ability
to
respond
adequately
or
change
your
decision.
It
stresses
the
importance
of
seeking
input
of
ethics
of
doing
an
analysis
to
better
prepare
for
next
time
(Georgetown
University
Center
for
Clinical
Bioethics).
Essentials
of
Professionalism
in
the
Workplace
Ethics
committees
are
formal
teams
composed
of
preselected
members
that
come
together
regularly
to
discuss
ethical
issues
within
an
organization.
The
members
often
include
physicians,
nurses,
an
on-‐staff
chaplain,
social
worker,
and
facility
administrative
staff
member,
and
sometimes
include
legal
representatives
as
well
as
local
community
representatives.
Times
may
arise
when
nurses
do
not
agree
with
physician,
family
member,
or
surrogate
decisions
regarding
treatment.
When
this
occurs,
nurses
often
seek
an
ethics
consultation.
This
act
is
part
of
the
nurse’s
role
as
a
patient
advocate.
The
role
of
the
professional
nurse
has
evolved,
as
there
has
been
a
shift
from
etiquette
to
ethics,
from
obedience
to
moral
autonomy,
assertiveness,
accountability,
and
advocacy
(Begley,
2010).
The
professional
nurse
is
also
an
autonomous
moral
practitioner
who
collaborates,
is
assertive,
operates
in
partnership
with
patients,
and
acts
as
an
advocate
when
patients
are
unable
to
speak
up
for
themselves
(Begley,
2010).
7
Module
2.
Ethics
and
the
Role
of
Nurse
as
Advocate
The
ideal
ethical
nurse
should
possess
qualities
such
as
moral
integrity
and
concern,
and
should
provide
culturally
sensitive
care
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
Moral
integrity
suggests
that
a
person
is
often
described
as
being
honest,
truthful,
trustworthy,
courageous,
benevolent,
and
wise
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
Moral
integrity
appears
to
represent
the
quality
of
one’s
character
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
Nurses
can
show
concern
by
serving
as
patient
advocates
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
Nurses
who
provide
culturally
sensitive
care
provide
care
that
acknowledges
and
respects
the
beliefs,
values,
and
customs
of
the
person
receiving
the
care
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
In
conclusion,
nurses
should
strive
to
uphold
the
moral
agreement
they
make
with
patients
and
communities
when
they
joined
the
nursing
profession
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
Nursing
care
includes
actions
such
as
promoting
health
and
preventing
illness,
but
the
most
important
responsibility
of
nursing
care
involves
caring
for
patients
who
are
experiencing
varying
degrees
of
physical,
psychological,
and
spiritual
suffering
(Butts
&
Rich,
2013).
8