Scribd
Upload
12 views1 page

Research Defense Rubric

The document outlines the research rubrics for title defense at Luis A. Ferrer National High School, detailing evaluation criteria across three main sections: Introduction, Literature Review and Conceptual Framework, and Research Design and Method. Each section includes indicators for assessment, allowing evaluators to score the research output from 1 to 5. The document concludes with a space for overall remarks and panel signatures.

Uploaded by

Mark Lorenz Sambalilo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
12 views1 page

Research Defense Rubric

The document outlines the research rubrics for title defense at Luis A. Ferrer National High School, detailing evaluation criteria across three main sections: Introduction, Literature Review and Conceptual Framework, and Research Design and Method. Each section includes indicators for assessment, allowing evaluators to score the research output from 1 to 5. The document concludes with a space for overall remarks and panel signatures.

Uploaded by

Mark Lorenz Sambalilo
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
REGION IV-A CALABARZON
DIVISION OF GENERAL TRIAS CITY

LUIS A. FERRER NATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL – GFMINHS ANNEX


RESEARCH RUBRICS FOR TITLE DEFENSE
Title of the Study: _________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Researchers: ___________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
Research Adviser: __________________________________________________________________
Date of Defense: _________________________
Directions: Analyze the research output based on the following criteria below. Check the appropriate
column (5 as the highest and 1 as the lowest) indicating your evaluation.
INTRODUCTION
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1 Remarks
1. The introduction consists of an adequate introductory discussion of the problem
2. Factors that led to the problem are well-discussed
3. The gap of knowledge of the study is clearly and specifically stated to convince the
readers of the need to conduct such study
4. The aims/ purposes or objectives were thoroughly presented.
5. In general, the manuscript is scholarly written and has impact in educational
context as a whole.
LITERATURE REVIEW AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1 Remarks
1. Cited literature and studies are adequate and relevant to the research problem.
2. Related literature and studies are recent (ten years ago to present year of the
study)
3. Foreign literature, studies, literature and local studies are present
4. The in-text citations are properly and clearly presented in the literature review.
5. The Literature Review is comprehensively done by the researchers and they only
stated researches relevant to their study
6. The sources of the cited literatures and studies are appropriately acknowledged
and or credited.
7. Synthesis of the reviewed literature and studies is well-organized, concise (not too
long nor too short) and is based on the researchers’ logical analysis of the cited
materials.
8. Conceptual framework adequately supports the main problem or the title of the
study
9. The researchers were able to determine the construct and variable of their study
from the theory presented.
10. The research paradigm is able to provide the direction and skeletal framework of
the study.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHOD
Indicators 5 4 3 2 1 Remarks
1. The research design is well-described and is suitable or fitting to the research
problem.
2. The participants of the study are well-described in terms of the sample profile,
sample size and sampling technique and or procedure.
3. The procedure and or techniques of gathering data are explained in complete
detail beginning from the time the researches sought permission to conduct the
study
OVER-ALL TOTAL: ___________________
Remarks: ______ Passed ______ Failed
_____ without revision
_____ with minor revision
_____ with major revision
_____ rejected
Panel Name and Signature: _____________________________________

You might also like