Vol. 12, No. 4 (2023) : 979 - 987 DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jtep-l.v12i4.

979-987

Design Development and Performance Evaluation of Two-Row Corn

Seed Planter
Ansar Ansar1, Nazaruddin2, Atri Dewi Azis3
1
Program Studi Teknik Pertanian Fakultas Teknologi Pangan dan Agroindustri, Universitas Mataram, Mataram, INDONESIA
2
Program Studi Ilmu dan Teknologi Pangan Fakultas Teknologi Pangan dan Agroindustri, Universitas Mataram, Mataram,
INDONESIA
3
Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan,Universitas Mataram, Mataram,
INDONESIA

Article History : ABSTRACT

Received : 24 April 2023
Received in revised form : 26 July 2023
Accepted : 26 July 2023 One of the main requirements for small-scale cultivators is that
they can be used in small plots of land and have simple design
and technology. However, many planting tools on the market
Keywords : today are not suitable for narrow land conditions. Therefore, this
Distance between seeds,
Efficiency, study aims to design and develop a corn seed planter that can be
Empty hole, operated in narrow areas and can improve seed planting
Land productivity, efficiency and accurate seed placement. The research
Planting hole
parameters observed were the distance between plants, the
depth of the planting holes, the number of seeds per planting
hole, and the efficiency of using the tool. The results of the
research show that the planting tools that have been designed
and developed are very easy and practical to operate by farmers
on narrow land. The distance between plants varies between
21.3 – 24.2 cm. The depth of the planting hole ranges from 5.4 –
7.1 cm. The distribution of the number of holes filled with 0 seeds
was 3.00%, filled with 1 seed was 90.38%, and filled with 2 seeds
was 6.62%. Planter efficiency data is 85.61%. This data shows

Corresponding Author: that this cultivator meets the minimum standards for the
[email protected] manually operated cultivator category.

1. INTRODUCTION

Farmers in Indonesia generally use a planting stick to plant corn seeds (Tokora, 2021). This
tool is made of wood which is used to make planting holes (Budiman, 2016). Corn kernels
are inserted into the hole manually (Adetola & Akinmade, 2020). The distance between
plants is only estimated by farmers (Djoyowasito et al., 2017). This method is less efficient
because it requires a lot of time and labor (Iskandar et al., 2017).
Planting corn seeds can be done better by using equipment that suits land conditions
(Ansar et al., 2020). Corn seed planting equipment can be designed based on farmer needs
and land conditions (Hajad et al., 2021). Indicators of success in designing a corn seed
planting tool are the farmer's comfort in using the tool, the tool's ability to increase
efficiency and reduce labor (Ghaderpour et al., 2018).

979
 Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung Vol 12, No. 4 (2023) : 979-987

Planting corn seeds is generally done by inserting the seeds into the planting hole at
a certain depth (Gill et al., 2014). If done manually, the planting holes are sometimes
filled with unequal numbers of seeds, and the distance between plants is irregular
(Alhassan et al., 2018). As a result, the distance between plants is not the same (Zhang
et al., 2019).
Various types of planting tool designs have been developed by previous researchers
and have advantages and disadvantages when operated. Brune et al. (2018) have
designed a corn seed planter with 94% efficiency, but it cannot be used on narrow
land. Yang et al. (2015) have developed a seed planting device with 73.4% efficiency
and three times faster than manual planting methods. Kumar et al. (2013) have
developed a planter with an average field capacity of between 0.28 to 0.31 ha/h at an
average speed of 2.27 km/h.
Currently, there are many research results that discuss corn seed planting tools
designed to make it easier for farmers when planting corn seeds (Oduma et al., 2014).
However, the planter still has a field working capacity that does not match its actual
capacity. Apart from that, the filling of seeds in each hole is not the same and the
distance between plants is irregular (Ansar et al., 2021).
The planting method using manual planting sticks can result in decreased land
productivity because the distance between plants is irregular (Syafa'at & Subantoro,
2017). Land productivity can be increased by optimally arranging the distance between
plants (Djiemon et al., 2019). However, too many plant populations can also interfere
with the interception of sunlight for photosynthesis (Yuliana et al., 2020). Thus, it is
necessary to design a corn seed planting tool that can regulate the distance between
plants. Based on this argument, this research aims to design and develop a corn seed
planting tool to be operated manually in narrow areas.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Materials and Tools

The materials used to make a two-row corn seed planter were cast iron, steel plate,
bolts and nuts of various sizes, chains, gears and acrylic. The design of the equipment
should be simple so that it is easy to produce with the existing local technology. The
supporting materials needed were welding wire, putty, sandpaper, and paint. The test
samples were corn seeds of the Bisi variety with a harvest age of ±125 days which had
been shelled in dry condition. The production equipment included an electric cutting
machine, electric welding machine, drilling machine, hacksaw machine, wrench,
compass, and protractor. Meanwhile, the research measuring equipment is a digital
tachometer, digital scales, stopwatch, measuring tape, and roll meter.

2.2. Design Stages

The research was carried out in several stages. First, identify the performance of the
tool before development, formulate design ideas based on the identification results,
analyze the components of the tool to be developed, create design drawings for the
planting tool, assemble the tool, and test the performance of each component of the
planter tool that has been developed.
The construction design of a prototype of a two-row corn seed planter was
presented in Figure 1. The furrow opener was made of durable V-shaped steel to
increase the accuracy of seed placement. The planter hopper was designed with a seed
capacity of 2.5 kg and was made of light and durable acrylic. Seed metering devices

980
Ansar et al. : Design Development and Performance Evaluation ...

were designed with a variety of seed size that can be changed in a very short time.
Panter handles were made from galvanized cylindrical pipes which can be adjusted to
suit the worker's body size. The drive wheels were made of plastic polyvinylchloride
(PVC) and were both coupled to the drive shaft.

Figure 1. Design of a two-row corn seed planter

2.3. Observation Procedure

Testing of the two-row corn seed planter was carried out in a rice field measuring 550 x
350 cm. The land is dry and only cultivated using a hoe. Tool testing was carried out 5
times in different plots. The performance parameters measured were the distance
between plants, the depth of the planting hole, the number of seeds per planting hole,
and the efficiency of the tool. Actual field capacity (KLA), theoretical field capacity
(KLT), and equipment efficiency (EA) are calculated using the following equation
(Hermawan, 2011):

(1)

(2)

(3)

where AFC = actual field capacity (ha/h), TFC = theoretical field capacity (ha/h), Ll =
planted area (ha), Wt = total time used for planting (h), V = equipment forward speed
(m/s), jt = planting space (cm), 36 = conversion factor (cm²/sec = 0.36 ha/h), and Eff =
equipment efficiency (%).

2.4. Data Analysis

The required data included the planting space, depth of planting holes, number of
seeds per hole, number of empty and uncovered holes, theoretical and actual field
capacity, and equipment efficiency. Data was presented in the form of tables and
graphs to determine the relationship between design parameters and the tool
performance (Ansar et al., 2020).

981
 Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung Vol 12, No. 4 (2023) : 979-987

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

3.1. Performance Test

Testing the performance of the corn seed planter is presented in Figure 2a. The figure
shows that the process of operating the designed planter is very easy and practical.
When pushed, the lever is able to open the seed allocation valve, so that the seeds can
fall into the planting hole based on the recommended distance between plants, namely
20 x 35 cm. This distance between plants is considered optimal for increasing land
productivity based on the results of previous research (Ansar et al., 2020). Wirawan et
al. (2018) also argue that spacing between plants is one of the factors for optimizing
land use productivity.
The results of observations of actual field capacity are presented in Figure 2b. The
results of observations show that actual field capacity varies between 0.241 - 0.275 ha/
h. This is thought to be because the operator's thrust speed is not constant. The
smallest actual field capacity is 0.241 ha/h and the largest is 0.275 ha/h. The average
field capacity was found to be 0.258 ha/h.

Figure 2. (a) Performance testing of the designed two-row corn seed planter in field;
(b) Field capacity (ha/h) of the equipment

3.2. Plant Space

The results of measuring the distance between plants are presented in Figure 3b. In
this picture it can be seen that the lowest distance between plants is 21.3 cm and the
highest is 24.2 cm. The results of these measurements show that the distance between
plants varies. This happens because the ground surface is uneven, so it always changes
as the wheel rotates. This variation in planting distance is still in accordance with the
planting distance recommended by previous researchers (Oduma et al., 2014).
Several factors influence land productivity, one of which is the distance between
plants. In general, low land productivity is caused by non-optimal spacing between
plants. Distances between plants that are too close together can result in the leaves of
other plants shading each other, resulting in stunted plant growth. Apart from that,
competition between plants for nutrients is also very large.
The growth of corn plants can be maximized by adjusting the distance between
plants. Setting the distance between plants can minimize intra- and inter-species
competition in populations. An excessive number of plants on limited land can reduce
competition for plant growth factors, such as nutrients, water, solar radiation and
growth space (Prastyo et al., 2017).

982
Ansar et al. : Design Development and Performance Evaluation ...

Figure 3. Results of performance testing of the designed two-row corn seed planter:
(a) Plant spacing (cm), (b) Planting depth

Spacing between plants that is too wide can improve the growth of individual plant
roots, but provides an opportunity for weeds to grow in the plant gaps. Corn plants
accompanied by weed growth can be detrimental because there is competition in the
use of nutrients, water, light and growing space. Spacing between plants, apart from
reducing the number of plant populations, also reduces the use of sunlight and plant
nutrients, because some of the solar radiation only falls on the soil surface and
nutrients can be lost as a result of evaporation. Nariratih et al. (2013) also reported
that spacing plants that are too close together can disrupt growth, but if they are too
far apart can reduce the number of plants per unit area.

3.3. Planting Depth

The results of measuring the depth of the planting hole are presented in Figure 3b. This
image shows that there are deep planting holes, but there are also shallow ones. This
varying depth of planting holes is caused by the uneven texture and condition of the
land because the soil processing process was not carried out perfectly. The planting
process occurs after the planting hole is formed and then the corn seeds fall directly
into the planting hole. The depth of the planting holes produced in this study ranged
from 5.4 – 7.1 cm.
The ideal depth of the planting hole according to research results (Sitorus, 2015) is 3
- 5 cm because it can produce perfect seed growth capacity. Planting seeds that are too
deep can cause poor growth. The depth of the planting hole resulting from this
research exceeds the standard ideal depth of planting holes. This is caused by the
spout of the planter being too tapered and sharp, resulting in a hole that is too deep.
Improving this planting tool can be done by designing a slightly blunt punch snout.
The research results of Lanya et al. (2020) also reported that the shallow depth of
the planting hole can cause the seeds to not be firmly planted because the roots are
not deep enough. The heavy load because the seed coat is lifted to the surface of the
soil can cause the seeds to fall easily when exposed to water.
The depth of the seed planting hole affects the growth and development of plant
roots. It is very important to pay attention to the depth of seed planting so that the
germination process, which is the beginning of seed growth and development, can take
place well. In addition, planting seeds too deep can cause the seeds to work harder to
reach the soil surface and will use up energy to produce leaves and stems (Amalia et
al., 2020).

983
 Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung Vol 12, No. 4 (2023) : 979-987

3.4. Distribution of the Number of Seeds per Planting Hole

The results of observations of the distribution of the number of seeds per planting hole
are presented in Table 1. In this table it can be seen that the distribution of the number
of seeds per hole varies. The distribution of the number of holes filled with 0 seeds was
3.00%, 90.38% filled with 1 seed, and 6.62% filled with 2 seeds. The number of seeds
expected per planting hole is only 1 seed. In fact, the seed rationing disc has been
designed by shifting the rotor casing to adjust the diameter of the corn kernels, but
sometimes the seed rationing process is not as desired. This variation in the number of
seeds per planting hole is thought to be caused by the non-uniform shape and
diameter of the corn seeds. Another factor is that there is no agitator implement, so
there is a buildup of seeds on the metering device which is influenced by the weight of
the seeds and the earth's gravitational force.

Table 1. Distribution of the number of seeds per planting hole

Distribution of number of seeds per hole (%)
Number of seed Average
1 2 3 4 5
0 2.86 2.62 3.57 4.05 1.90 3.00
1 89.05 89.76 90.95 89.76 92.38 90.38
2 8.10 7.62 5.48 6.19 5.71 6.62

The seed allocation component is the most important part of this planting tool
because it functions as a divider for the seeds to fall regularly into the planting hole.
This component is driven by the rotational power of the wheel by rotating the planting
unit's axis, so that the seeds can fall based on the earth's gravitational force. The
performance of the seed removal tool has worked well because it is able to place seeds
in the soil with an average of one seed per hole, although there are still holes with two
seeds. More than one seed in one hole can cause competition for sunlight. On the
other hand, if many planting holes are empty, then the plant population is not optimal
so that production per area will be low. Likewise, the number of seeds in each planting
hole must also be considered when cultivating corn. An excessive number of seeds per
planting hole cannot provide optimal results. In order for the growth and development
of corn plants to be optimal with high production, the number of hollow seeds must be
properly regulated to maintain the balance of food nutrients in the soil. The greater the
number of seeds in the planting hole, the nutritional requirements also increase.

3.5. Field Efficiency

The results of testing in the field obtained data on actual field capacity (AFC),
theoretical field capacity (TFC), and efficiency (Eff) as shown in Table 2. The average
AFC value was 0.27 ha/hour, while the average TFC value was the average is 0.31 ha/
hour, so that the efficiency of the planting equipment is obtained on average at
85.61%. This data shows that the efficiency of this planter has met the minimum
standards for the manually operated planter category, as previously reported by
researchers. The efficiency value obtained from this research is higher when compared
with the results of research (Djoyowasito et al., 2017) regarding performance tests and
design of a single-tube system corn seed planting machine which only produced an
efficiency of 82%.

984
Ansar et al. : Design Development and Performance Evaluation ...

Table 2. Data on the efficiency of using a two-row corn seed planter

Plot AFC (ha/jam) TFC (ha/ jam) Efficiency (%)
1 0,27 0,31 87,10
2 0,26 0,31 83,87
3 0,27 0,32 84,38
4 0,28 0,33 84,85
5 0,29 0,33 87,88
Average 0,27 0,32 85,61
Deviation Standard 0,010 0,009 1,580

Based on the data in Table 2, it can be seen that the efficiency value of using the
two-row corn seed planting tool is greatly influenced by the pushing speed and soil
texture. The higher the pushing speed, the higher the efficiency of tool use. A similar
thing has been reported by (Yazgi, 2016) that short planting times can provide higher
efficiency. The maximum recommended forward speed limit for this tool is 2.33 km/h
based on previous research. If it's too fast, sometimes the corn seeds won't embed
properly.
The land area used to test the capacity of the tool is 550 x 350 cm. The distance
between plants has been determined based on the results of preliminary research,
namely 20 x 35 cm. To obtain accurate and precise test results, field tests are carried
out in rice fields to produce more accurate data. The location for this field test was a
rainfed rice field which was dry at the time the test was carried out. The testing
process starts from placing corn seeds in the seed storage tank to observing the
number of seeds that come out and are embedded in the hole.
Field test results show that when the tool crosses hard and rocky soil textures, the
planting mouth cannot open a soil groove that matches the desired hole depth. This
happens because the weight of the tool is less than optimal and the groove opening tip
is not sharp enough. Even though the land conditions used to test this planting tool
were uneven, planting holes were still formed. The same thing has been reported by
(Sianipar & Fatoni, 2019) that the hard soil texture conditions sometimes make it
difficult to form planting holes, so that the distance between plants is sometimes not
the desired distance. Furthermore (Cay et al., 2018) said that the distance between
plants in each plot can vary due to the influence of the uneven ground surface. Thus,
as far as possible, till the soil as thoroughly as possible before planting.

4. CONCLUSION

The components of the two-row corn seed planter that have been designed can be
used to plant corn seeds, although there are still several shortcomings and limitations.
These shortcomings can be taken into consideration for the development of
subsequent tools. The lowest distance between plants is 21.3 cm and the highest is
24.2 cm. The depth of the planting hole ranges from 3.0 – 7.1 cm. The distribution of
the number of holes filled with 0 seeds was 3.00%, 90.38% filled with 1 seed, and
6.62% filled with 2 seeds. The average efficiency of planting equipment is 85.61%. The
efficiency value of tool use depends on the worker's pushing speed. High thrust speeds
can also result in high tool usage efficiency. The efficiency value can increase if this
planting tool is used on land with a soft soil texture and a flat surface. Fast planting and
less tiring work are important benefits for farmers from using this tool.

985
 Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung Vol 12, No. 4 (2023) : 979-987

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Thank and appreciation are expressed to the Director of Research, Technology and
Community Service, Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education of the
Republic of Indonesia for the Applied Research Grant funds for Fiscal Year 2023.

REFERENCES

Adetola, O. & Akinmade, V. (2020). Development and performance evaluation of a

maize planter. International Journal of Engineering Science and Application, 4(4),
157-164.
Alhassan, E. A., Adewumi, A. D., & Okpodjah, B. (2018). Development of a self-
propelled multi-crop two rows precision planter: A new design concept for the
metering mechanism. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and
Technology, 9(10), 349-358.
Amalia, A. F., Rahayu, S. P., & Muhctar. (2020). Performance comparison of corn seed
planter and tugal in dry land Sigi District Central Sulawesi. Jurnal Agritechno, 13(2),
97-104. https://doi.org/10.20956/at.v13i2.356
Ansar, Murad, Putra, G. D., & Hartuti, H. (2020). Pemetaan lahan pertanian di
Kabupaten Lombok Timur menggunakan Sistem Informasi Geografis (SIG). Jurnal
Teknik Pertanian Lampung, 9(2), 140-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jtep-
l.v9i2.140-148
Ansar, A., Sukmawaty, S., Sabani, R., & Murad, M. (2020). Penerapan alat tanam biji
jagung sistem dorong di Desa Gumantar Kabupaten Lombok Utara-NTB. Jurnal
Ilmiah Abdi Mas TPB, 2(2), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.29303/amtpb.v2i2.52
Ansar, A., Murad, M., Sukmawaty, S., Khalil, R., & Ulumuddin, A. (2021). Desain dan uji
kinerja alat tanam biji jagung sistem dorong baris ganda di lahan tanpa olah tanah.
Jurnal Rekayasa Pertanian dan Biosistem, 9(1), 48-56. https://doi.org/10.29303/
jrpb.v9i1.214
Brune, P.F., Ryan, B.J., Technow, F., & Myers, D.B. (2018). Relating planter downforce
and soil strength. Soil and Tillage Research, 184, 243–252. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2018.08.003.
Cay, A., Kocabiyik, H., & May, S. (2018). Development of an electro-mechanic control
system for seed-metering unit of single seed corn planters Part I: Design and
laboratory simulation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 144, 71-79.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.11.035
Djiemon, A., Gasser, M.O., & Galli, J. (2019). Random forests to detect subsoiling and
subsurface drainage effects on corn plant height and water table depth. Soil and
Tillage Research, 192, 240-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.01.007.
Djoyowasito, G., Sutan, S.M., Hendrawan, Y., & Hilmi, M. (2017). Uji performansi
rancang bangun mesin penanam benih jagung (Zea mays L.) sistem tugal. Jurnal
Keteknikan Pertanian Tropis dan Biosistem, 5(1), 49-55.
Ghaderpour, O., Rafiee, S., Sharifi, M., & Mousavi-Avval, S.H. (2018). Quantifying the
environmental impacts of alfalfa production in different farming systems.
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 27, 109-118. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2018.04.002.
Gill, A.N., Ghafoor, A., Munir, A., & Iqbal, M. (2014). Design modification and field
performance of two row maize planter. International Journal of Development
Research, 4(7), 1336-1340.
Hajad, M., Radi, R., & Purwantana, B. (2021). Pengembangan alat tanam jagung tipe

986
Ansar et al. : Design Development and Performance Evaluation ...

tugal dalam untuk lahan kritis. Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung, 10(2), 129-138.
https://doi.org/10.23960/jtep-l.v10i2.129-138.
Hermawan, W. (2011). Perbaikan desain mesin penanam dan pemupuk jagung
bertenega traktor tangan. Jurnal Keteknikan Pertanian, 25(1), 9-18.
Iskandar, M., Syafriandi, & Mustaqimah. (2017). Desain dan Pengujian Alat Tanam
Benih Jagung. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa (JIM) Pertanian, 2(1), 314-319.
Kumar, S., Singh, M., & Singh, B.R. (2013). Feasibility and economic viability of raised
bed planter in western plane zone of Uttar Pradesh, India. Soil and Tillage
Research, 128, 37-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2012.10.008.
Lanya, B., Laksono, P.A., & Ridwan, W.A. (2020). Rancang bangun sistem fertigasi
dengan menggunakan venturimeter. Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung, 9(2), 122-
130. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jtep-l.v9i2.122-130
Zhang, L., Maki, H., Ma, D., Sánchez-Gallego, J.A., Mickelbart, M.V., Wang, L., Rehman,
T.U., & Jin, J. (2019). Optimized angles of the swing hyperspectral imaging system
for single corn plant. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 156, 349-359.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.11.030
Nariratih, I., Damanik, B., Majid, M., & Sitanggang, G. (2013). Ketersediaan nitrogen
pada tiga jenis tanah akibat pemberian tiga bahan organik dan serapannya pada
tanaman jagung. Jurnal Agroekoteknologi, 1(3), 479-488.
Oduma, O., Edeh, J.C., & Onu, O.O. (2014). Performance evaluation of a locally
developed three-row maize planter. International Journal of Agricultural Science
and Bioresource Engineering Research, 3(4), 67-76.
Prastyo, H.A., Tamrin, & Oktafri. (2017). Uji kinerja alat pemecah benih kelapa sawit.
Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung, 6(2), 115-124.
Sianipar, T. O., & Fatoni, Z. (2019). Perancangan alat penanam benih jagung dan
penyiraman. Turbulen: Jurnal Teknik Mesin, 2(1), 25-32. http://
dx.doi.org/10.36767%2Fturbulen.v2i1.523
Sitorus, A. (2015). Pengembangan mesin penanam dan pemupuk jagung terintegrasi
dengan pengolahan tanah alur. Jurnal Keteknikan Pertanian, 81-88.
Syafa’at, I., & Subantoro. (2017). Perancangan alat penanam benih jagung multifungsi
bagi masyarakat Singorojo, Kendal. Abdimas Unwahas, 2(2), 40-44.
Tokora, E.L. (2021). Desain alat penanam jagung manual di Kampung Kali Semen Distrik
Nabire Barat Kabupaten Nabire. Jurnal Teknologi dan Rekayasa, 6(2), 40-49.
Wirawan, D.A. (2016) Pengujian dan evaluasi alat tanam jagung model HPCP-01 tipe
dorong sistem injeksi pada lahan sempit. Prosiding Seminar Nasional
Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian, Politeknik Negeri Lampung 08 September
2016, 272-280.
Wirawan, D.A., Haryono, G., & Susilowati, Y.E. (2018). Pengaruh jumlah tanaman per
lubang dan jarak tanam terhadap hasil tanaman kacang tanah (Arachis hypogea,
L.) var. kancil. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Tropika dan Subtropika, 3(1), 5-8.
Yang, L; He, X. T; Cui, T; Zhang, D. X; Shi, S; Zhang, R; & Wang, M. (2015). Development
of mechatronic driving system for seed meters equipped on conventional
precision corn planter. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological
Engineering (IJABE), 8(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3965/j.ijabe.20150804.1717.
Yazgi , A. (2016). Effect of seed tubes on corn planter performance. Applied
Engineering in Agriculture, 32(6), 783-790. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.11274
Yuliana, E., Widyawati, N., & Sutrisno, A.J. (2020). Pengaruh komposisi media tanam
terhadap pertumbuhan dan hasil tanaman bunga gladiol (Gladiolus hybridus L.).
Jurnal Teknik Pertanian Lampung, 9(4), 353-360. http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jtep-
l.v9i4.353-360

987