1.

Find the mean, median, mode, standard deviation, interquartile range, and coefficient of variation for the following scores.
2. Construct a frequency distribution and draw a histogram.

Scores Scores Q1 7.75

6 Q3 18.75
7 Mean 13.48275862069
10 Standard Error 1.3294881137005 IQR 11
13 Median 13
12 Mode 13 CV 0.531012
16 Standard Deviation 7.1595126014035
17 Sample Variance 51.258620689655
23 Kurtosis -0.961960322659
21 Skewness -0.21928462122
8
22 Range 24
2 Minimum 1 7
1 Maximum 25 6
3 Sum 391
5
13 Count 29
13 4
20 3
22 min 1
24 max 25 2
25 1
13
0
12 5
11
4
5
2
10
19
17
18
16
ariation for the following scores.

Score Bin Frequency Percentage

1-5 5 6 20.00
6-10 10 4 13.33
10-15 15 7 23.33
15-20 20 7 23.33
20-25 25 6 20.00
TOTAL 30 100.00

Histogram
8

0
5 10 15 20 25
Use an appropriate statistical tool to answer the following statement of the problem.
1. What is the profile of the respondents when classified according to major?
2. Is there a significant difference in the pretest scores of the control group and the treatment group?
3. Is there a significant difference in the pretest and posttest scores of the treatment group?
4. Is there a significant difference in the midterm grades of the students when grouped according to year level?

Group Year level Major Pretest Posttest Final Grade

TreatmentSophomor Comp Sci 8 14 78
TreatmentJunior Comp Sci 9 15 79
TreatmentJunior Mathemati 11 17 89
TreatmentSenior Physics 10 18 90
TreatmentSophomor Statistics 9 19 92
TreatmentJunior Statistics 8 18 93
TreatmentSenior Comp Sci 9 19 89
Control Sophomor Mathemati 12 19 87
Control Sophomor Physics 12 17 79
Control Sophomor Physics 9 18 80
Control Junior Physics 10 20 83
TreatmentSenior Mathemati 8 19 81
TreatmentJunior Mathemati 9 20 87
TreatmentSophomor Statistics 9 18 91
TreatmentSenior Statistics 11 19 92
TreatmentJunior Comp Sci 11 19 99
Control Senior Comp Sci 12 18 96
Control Sophomor Mathemati 10 19 95
Control Junior Statistics 12 18 78
Control Sophomor Statistics 9 20 76
Control Sophomor Statistics 12 11 75
Control Junior Statistics 11 18 79
TreatmentJunior Physics 11 20 80
TreatmentSenior Physics 3 18 87
Control Senior Comp Sci 12 20 81
Control Senior Mathemati 11 18 87
Control Sophomor Comp Sci 10 18 91
TreatmentSophomor Comp Sci 10 19 92
Control Junior Physics 9 18 99
Control Junior Mathemati 9 17 96
Control Senior Statistics 11 17 81
Control Sophomor Mathemati 12 16 87
Control Sophomor Statistics 12 11 84
Control Junior Statistics 11 18 78
TreatmentJunior Physics 11 20 99
TreatmentSenior Physics 3 18 96
Control Senior Comp Sci 12 20 78
Control Senior Mathemati 11 18 79
Control Sophomor Comp Sci 10 18 80
TreatmentSophomor Comp Sci 10 19 90
g to year level?
1. What is the profile of the respondents when classified according to major?
2. Is there a significant difference in the pretest scores of the control group and the treatment group?
3. Is there a significant difference in the pretest and posttest scores of the treatment group?
4. Is there a significant difference in the midterm grades of the students when grouped according to year level?

ANSWER FOR NO. 1

MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR MAJOR
Comp Sci Mathematics Physics Statistics
Comp Sci Mathematics Physics Statistics MAJOR
Comp Sci Mathematics Physics Statistics COMP SCI
Comp Sci Mathematics Physics Statistics MATH
Comp Sci Mathematics Physics Statistics PHYSICS
Comp Sci Mathematics Physics Statistics STATISTICS
Comp Sci Mathematics Physics Statistics TOTAL
Comp Sci Mathematics Physics Statistics
Comp Sci Mathematics Physics Statistics
Comp Sci Statistics
Comp Sci Statistics

ANSWER FOR NO. 2

GROUP PRETEST GROUP PRETEST t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances
Treatment 8 Control 12
Treatment 9 Control 12 PRETEST
Treatment 11 Control 9 Mean
Treatment 10 Control 10 Variance
Treatment 9 Control 12 Observations
Treatment 8 Control 10 Hypothesized Mean Difference
Treatment 9 Control 12 df
Treatment 8 Control 9 t Stat
Treatment 9 Control 12 P(T<=t) one-tail
Treatment 9 Control 11 t Critical one-tail
Treatment 11 Control 12 P(T<=t) two-tail
Treatment 11 Control 11 t Critical two-tail
Treatment 11 Control 10
Treatment 3 Control 9
Treatment 10 Control 9
Treatment 11 Control 11
Treatment 3 Control 12
Treatment 10 Control 12
Control 11
Control 12
Control 11
Control 10
 ANSWER FOR NO. 3
GROUP PRETEST POSTTEST t-Test: Paired Two Sample for Means
Treatment 8 14
Treatment 9 15 TREATMENT
Treatment 11 17 Mean
Treatment 10 18 Variance
Treatment 9 19 Observations
Treatment 8 18 Pearson Correlation
Treatment 9 19 Hypothesized Mean Difference
Treatment 8 19 df
Treatment 9 20 t Stat
Treatment 9 18 P(T<=t) one-tail
Treatment 11 19 t Critical one-tail
Treatment 11 19 P(T<=t) two-tail
Treatment 11 20 t Critical two-tail
Treatment 3 18
Treatment 10 19
Treatment 11 20
Treatment 3 18
Treatment 10 19

ANSWER FOR NO. 4

Junior Senior sophomor
79 90 78 Anova: Single Factor
89 89 92
93 81 87 SUMMARY
83 92 79 Groups Count
87 96 80 JUNIORS 13
99 87 91 SENIORS 12
78 81 95 SOPHOMORE 15
79 87 76
80 81 75
99 96 91 ANOVA
96 78 92 Source of Variation SS
78 79 87 Between Groups 43.0480769230762
99 84 Within Groups 1971.72692307692
80
90 Total 2014.775
ment group?

ccording to year level?

FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
11 27.5 1. Profile of the respondents when
9
9
22.5
22.5
classified according to major
11 27.5
40 100.0

suming Unequal Variances

CONTROL TREARMENT
10.86363636 8.888888889
1.361471861 5.751633987 2. Is there a significant difference in the pretest scores of the
22 18 control group and the treatment group?
0
24
3.197493439
REJECT, THERE IS SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN THE
0.00193203 PRETEST SCORES OF THE CONTROL GROUP AND THE
1.71088208 TREATMENT GROUP
0.003864061
2.063898562
mple for Means

PRETEST POSTTEST
8.888888889 18.27777778
5.751633987 2.565359477
3. Is there a significant difference in the pretest and posttest scores
18 18
0.238213774
of the treatment group?
0
17 REJECT, THERE IS SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN THE
-15.63978973 PRETEST AND POSTTEST SCORES OF THE TREATMENT
7.964702E-12 GROUP.
1.739606726
1.59294E-11
2.109815578

F-Test Two-Sample for Variances

JUNIOR SENIOR
Sum Average Variance Mean 87.61538 86.41666667
1139 87.61538462 75.25641 Variance 75.25641 40.81060606
1037 86.41666667 40.81061 Observatio 13 12
1277 85.13333333 44.26667 df 12 11
F 1.84404
P(F<=f) one0.160151
F Critical o 2.787569
df MS F P-value F crit
2 21.52403846 0.403905 0.670616 3.251924
37 53.28991684
4. Is there a significant difference in the midterm
39 grouped according to year level?

ACCEPT, THERE IS SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN th

students when grouped according to year level.
test scores of the

ERENCE IN THE
GROUP AND THE
est and posttest scores

RENCE IN THE
THE TREATMENT

F-Test Two-Sample for Variances F-Test Two-Sample for Variances

SENIOR SOPHOMORE JUNIOR SOPHOMORE

Mean 86.41667 85.133333333 Mean 87.61538 85.133333333
Variance 40.81061 44.266666667 Variance 75.25641 44.266666667
Observatio 12 15 Observatio 13 15
df 11 14 df 12 14
F 0.921926 F 1.70007
P(F<=f) one0.453612 P(F<=f) one0.170799
F Critical o 0.365144 F Critical o 2.534243

ant difference in the midterm grades of the students when

o year level?

GNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN the midterm grades of the

ped according to year level.
1. Draw a Scatter Plot for Weight and Height.
2. Is there a significant realationship between weight and height?
3. Find the equation of the best fit line.
X Y
Weight (kg) Height (cm)
56 154
Weight and Height R
65 162
72 167 200
83 173
180
85 175
67 160 160
76 165
56 152 140
48 134
55 154 120
66 162
100
71 155
82 173 80
87 177
65 162 60
73 165
55 151 40
49 132
20
56 154
48 132 0
55 156 45 50 55 60 65
66 161
71 156
82 172 Anova: Single Factor
87 180
71 155 SUMMARY
82 173 Groups Count Sum Average Variance
87 177 weight 30 2054 68.46667 154.1885
65 162 height 30 4816 160.5333 157.4299
73 165

ANOVA
Source of Variati SS df MS F
Between Groups 127144.1 1 127144.1 816.0242
Within Groups 9036.933 58 155.8092

Total 136181 59

SUMMARY OUTPUT

Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.918842
R Square 0.844271
Adjusted R Squar 0.838709
Standard Error 4.9869
Observations 30

ANOVA
df SS MS F
Regression 1 3775.13 3775.13 151.7996
Residual 28 696.3369 24.86918
Total 29 4471.467

CoefficientStandard Et Stat P-value

Intercept -77.51173 11.88316 -6.522822 4.536E-07
X Variable 1 0.909334 0.073805 12.3207 7.976E-13
 Weight and Height Relationship

60 65 70 75 80 85 90

2. Is there a significant realationship between

weight and height?

Yes, there is a significant relationship between

weight and height. Base on the data and scatter
plot presentation there is positive realationship
P-value F crit
7.378764051251E-36 4.00687288633
between weight and height, because as the heigh
increases there is also increase in weight.
 Interpretation:
The result shows the
value of 84.4% reve
variable explained 8
Significance F
7.975942324662E-13 outcome variable. T
positively Predicted

Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%

-101.853270454597 -53.170180963 -101.853270455 -53.17018096
0.758150341807084 1.06051733729 0.75815034181 1.0605173373
 90

ationship between

elationship between
the data and scatter
ositive realationship
, because as the height
ease in weight.
Interpretation:
The result shows the impact of X on Y. the R2
value of 84.4% revealed that the predictor
variable explained 84.4% variance in the
outcome variable. The finding revealed that X
positively Predicted Y(B=0.91, p=7.97).